lecture 5 power system operation, transmission lines professor tom overbye department of electrical...
TRANSCRIPT
Lecture 5 Power System Operation, Transmission Lines
Professor Tom OverbyeDepartment of Electrical and
Computer Engineering
ECE 476
POWER SYSTEM ANALYSIS
2
Reading and Homework
• 1st Exam moved to Oct 11 (in class)• For lectures 4 through 6 please be reading Chapter 4
– we will not be covering sections 4.7, 4.11, and 4.12 in detail though you should still at least skim those sections.
• HW 1 is 2.9, 22, 28, 32, 48; due Thursday 9/8• For Problem 2.32 you need to use the PowerWorld Software. You can
download the software and cases at the below link; get version 15.http://www.powerworld.com/gloversarma.asp
Direct PowerWorld download page is
http://www.powerworld.com/DemoSoftware/GloverSarmaSimdwnldv15.asp
3
Substation Bus
4
Power Transactions
Power transactions are contracts between areas to do power transactions.
Contracts can be for any amount of time at any price for any amount of power.
Scheduled power transactions are implemented by modifying the area ACE:
ACE = Pactual,tie-flow - Psched
5
100 MW Transaction
Bus 2 Bus 1
Bus 3Home Area
Scheduled Transactions
225 MW
113 MVR
150 MW
291 MW 8 MVR
138 MVR
113 MW 56 MVR
1.00 PU
8 MW -2 MVR
-8 MW 2 MVR
-84 MW 27 MVR
85 MW-23 MVR
93 MW-25 MVR
-92 MW
30 MVR
1.00 PU
1.00 PU
0 MW 32 MVR
100 MWAGC ONAVR ON
AGC ONAVR ON
100.0 MW
Scheduled100 MWTransaction from Left to Right
Net tie-lineflow is now100 MW
6
Security Constrained ED
Transmission constraints often limit system economics.
Such limits required a constrained dispatch in order to maintain system security.
In three bus case the generation at bus 3 must be constrained to avoid overloading the line from bus 2 to bus 3.
7
Security Constrained Dispatch
Bus 2 Bus 1
Bus 3Home Area
Scheduled Transactions
357 MW
179 MVR
194 MW
448 MW 19 MVR
232 MVR
179 MW 89 MVR
1.00 PU
-22 MW 4 MVR
22 MW -4 MVR
-142 MW 49 MVR
145 MW-37 MVR
124 MW-33 MVR
-122 MW
41 MVR
1.00 PU
1.00 PU
0 MW 37 MVR100%
100%
100 MWOFF AGCAVR ON
AGC ONAVR ON
100.0 MW
Dispatch is no longer optimal due to need to keep line from bus 2 to bus 3 from overloading
8
Multi-Area Operation
If Areas have direct interconnections, then they may directly transact up to the capacity of their tie-lines.
Actual power flows through the entire network according to the impedance of the transmission lines.
Flow through other areas is known as “parallel path” or “loop flows.”
9
Seven Bus Case: One-line
Top Area Cost
Left Area Cost Right Area Cost
1
2
3 4
5
6 7
106 MW
168 MW
200 MW 201 MW
110 MW 40 MVR
80 MW 30 MVR
130 MW 40 MVR
40 MW 20 MVR
1.00 PU
1.01 PU
1.04 PU1.04 PU
1.04 PU
0.99 PU1.05 PU
62 MW
-61 MW
44 MW -42 MW -31 MW 31 MW
38 MW
-37 MW
79 MW -77 MW
-32 MW
32 MW-14 MW
-39 MW
40 MW-20 MW 20 MW
40 MW
-40 MW
94 MW
200 MW 0 MVR
200 MW 0 MVR
20 MW -20 MW
AGC ON
AGC ON
AGC ON
AGC ON
AGC ON
8029 $/MWH
4715 $/MWH 4189 $/MWH
Case Hourly Cost 16933 $/MWH
System hasthree areas
Area lefthas onebus
Area right has onebus
Area tophas fivebuses
10
Seven Bus Case: Area View
System has40 MW of“Loop Flow”
Actualflowbetweenareas
Loop flow can result in higher losses
Area Losses
Area Losses Area Losses
Top
Left Right
-40.1 MW
0.0 MW
0.0 MW
0.0 MW
40.1 MW
40.1 MW
7.09 MW
0.33 MW 0.65 MW
Scheduledflow
11
Seven Bus - Loop Flow?
Area Losses
Area Losses Area Losses
Top
Left Right
-4.8 MW
0.0 MW
100.0 MW
0.0 MW
104.8 MW
4.8 MW
9.44 MW
-0.00 MW 4.34 MW
100 MW Transactionbetween Left and Right
Transaction has actually decreasedthe loop flow
Note thatTop’s Losses haveincreasedfrom 7.09MW to9.44 MW
12
Pricing Electricity
Cost to supply electricity to bus is called the locational marginal price (LMP)
Presently some electric makets post LMPs on the web In an ideal electricity market with no transmission
limitations the LMPs are equal Transmission constraints can segment a market, resulting
in differing LMP Determination of LMPs requires the solution on an
Optimal Power Flow (OPF)
13
3 BUS LMPS - OVERLOAD IGNORED
Bus 2 Bus 1
Bus 3
Total Cost
0 MW
0 MW
180 MWMW
10.00 $/MWh
60 MW 60 MW
60 MW
60 MW120 MW
120 MW
10.00 $/MWh
10.00 $/MWh
180 MW120%
120%
0 MWMW
1800 $/hr
Line from Bus 1 to Bus 3 is over-loaded; all buses have same marginal cost
Gen 1’scostis $10per MWh
Gen 2’scostis $12per MWh
14
LINE OVERLOAD ENFORCED
Bus 2 Bus 1
Bus 3
Total Cost
60 MW
0 MW
180 MWMW
12.00 $/MWh
20 MW 20 MW
80 MW
80 MW100 MW
100 MW
10.00 $/MWh
14.01 $/MWh
120 MW 80% 100%
80% 100%
0 MWMW
1921 $/hr
Line from 1 to 3 is no longer overloaded, but nowthe marginal cost of electricity at 3 is $14 / MWh
15
MISO and PJM
MISO and PJM arethe reliabilitycoordinatorscovering theelectric gridin Illinois. ComEd is inPJM, and Ameren is inMISO.
16
MISO LMPs 8/31/11 at 11:05 AM
www.midwestmarket.org
17
Development of Line Models
Goals of this section are
1) develop a simple model for transmission lines
2) gain an intuitive feel for how the geometry of the transmission line affects the model parameters
18
Primary Methods for Power Transfer
The most common methods for transfer of electric power are
1) Overhead ac
2) Underground ac
3) Overhead dc
4) Underground dc
5) other
19 19
345 kV+ Transmission Growth at a Glance
20 20
345 kV+ Transmission Growth at a Glance
21 21
345 kV+ Transmission Growth at a Glance
22 22
345 kV+ Transmission Growth at a Glance
23 23
345 kV+ Transmission Growth at a Glance
24
Magnetics Review
Ampere’s circuital law:
e
F = mmf = magnetomtive force (amp-turns)
= magnetic field intensity (amp-turns/meter)
d = Vector differential path length (meters)
= Line integral about closed path (d is tangent to path)
I =
eF d I
H l
H
l
l
Algebraic sum of current linked by
25
Line Integrals
Line integrals are a generalization of traditional integration
Integration along thex-axis
Integration along ageneral path, whichmay be closed
Ampere’s law is most useful in cases of symmetry, such as with an infinitely long line
26
Magnetic Flux Density
Magnetic fields are usually measured in terms of flux density
0-7
0
= flux density (Tesla [T] or Gauss [G])(1T = 10,000G)
For a linear a linear magnetic material
= where is the called the permeability
=
= permeability of freespace = 4 10
= relative permea
r
r
H m
B
B H
bility 1 for air
27
Magnetic Flux
Total flux passing through a surface A is
=
= vector with direction normal to the surface
If flux density B is uniform and perpendicular to an area A then
=
Ad
d
BA
B a
a
28
Magnetic Fields from Single Wire
Assume we have an infinitely long wire with current of 1000A. How much magnetic flux passes through a 1 meter square, located between 4 and 5 meters from the wire?
Direction of H is givenby the “Right-hand” Rule
Easiest way to solve the problem is to take advantage of symmetry. For an integration path we’ll choose acircle with a radius of x.
29
Single Line Example, cont’d
0
5 00 4
70
5
4
22
25 5
ln 2 10 ln2 4 4
4.46 10 Wb
2 10 2B T Gauss
x
A
IxH I H
xB H
IH dA dx
xI
I
x
For reference, the earth’smagnetic field is about0.6 Gauss (Central US)
30
Flux linkages and Faraday’s law
N
i=1
Flux linkages are defined from Faraday's law
dV = where V = voltage, = flux linkages
The flux linkages tell how much flux is linking an
N turn coil:
=
If all flux links every coil then
i
dt
N
31
Inductance
For a linear magnetic system, that is one where
B = H
we can define the inductance, L, to be
the constant relating the current and the flux
linkage
= L i
where L has units of Henrys (H)
32
Inductance Example
Calculate the inductance of an N turn coil wound tightly on a torodial iron core that has a radius of R and a cross-sectional area of A. Assume
1) all flux is within the coil
2) all flux links each turn
33
Inductance Example, cont’d
0
0
20
2 (path length is 2 R)
H2
2
H2
e
r
r
r
I d
NI H R
NIB H H
RAB N LI
NINAB NA
R
N AL
R
H l
34
Inductance of a Single Wire
To development models of transmission lines, we first need to determine the inductance of a single, infinitely long wire. To do this we need to determine the wire’s total flux linkage, including
1. flux linkages outside of the wire
2. flux linkages within the wire
We’ll assume that the current density within the wire is uniform and that the wire has a radius of r.
35
Flux Linkages outside of the wire
R0A r
We'll think of the wire as a single loop closed at
infinity. Therefore = since N = 1. The flux linking
the wire out to a distance of R from the wire center is
d length 2Idxx
B a
36
Flux Linkages outside, cont’d
R0A r
R 00r
d length 2
Since length = we'll deal with per unit length values,
assumed to be per meter.
ln2 2
Note, this quantity still goes to infinity as R
Idxx
I Rdx Imeter x r
B a
37
Flux linkages inside of wire
Current inside conductor tends to travel on the outside
of the conductor due to the skin effect. The pentration
of the current into the conductor is approximated using
1the skin depth = where f is
f the frequency in Hz
and is the conductivity in mhos/meter.
0.066 mFor copper skin depth 0.33 inch at 60HZ.
fFor derivation we'll assume a uniform current density.
38
Flux linkages inside, cont’d
Wire cross section
x
r
2
2
2
Current enclosed within distance
x of center I
2 2
e
ex
xI
rI Ix
Hx r
2 30
inside 2 2 40 0
Flux only links part of current
2 82
r r rIx x Ixdx dx I
r r r
39
Line Total Flux & Inductance
0 0
0
0
(per meter) ln2 8
(per meter) ln2 4
L(per meter) ln2 4
Note, this value still goes to infinity as we integrate
R out to infinity
rTotal
rTotal
r
RI I
rR
Ir
Rr
40
Inductance Simplification
0 0 4
0 4
Inductance expression can be simplified using
two exponential identities:
aln(ab)=ln a + ln b ln ln ln ln( )
b
ln ln ln ln2 4 2
ln ln2
r
r
a
r
a b a e
RL R r e
r
L R re
0
4r
ln2 '
Where r' 0.78 for 1r
Rr
r e r