lecture 06 - corporate strategy.pptx

Upload: regan-dsilva

Post on 03-Apr-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/28/2019 Lecture 06 - Corporate Strategy.pptx

    1/13

    Lecture Session

    6

    Corporate Strategy

    Dr K. SankaranDirector

    Justice KS Hegde Management Institute

    Nitte, Karnataka

  • 7/28/2019 Lecture 06 - Corporate Strategy.pptx

    2/13

    Multi-Business Organization

    But what about Corporate Strategy?

    (Johnson, Scholes and Whittington, 2008)

  • 7/28/2019 Lecture 06 - Corporate Strategy.pptx

    3/13

    Rationale for the Portfolio

    What businesses to be in and their characteristics?Portfolio Rationalization (Matrix / Core Competency)

    Growth - M&As, Greenfield - Means of getting there

    Managing the Businesses - Parenting

    Corporate Strategy Issues

  • 7/28/2019 Lecture 06 - Corporate Strategy.pptx

    4/13

    CORPORATE STRATEGYPARENTING

    Applies to Multi-businesses consists of several businesses with a parent corporate consisting of its own

    hierarchy line and staff functions. Eg. Tata Industries is a corporate parents for many Tata organizations

    Corporate Strategy guides corporate level decisions and addresses two basic questions:

    1)Investments in what buz. (through ownership, minority holdings, joint ventures or alliances?)

    2)What is the nature of influence exerted by the corporate on the individual businesses

    Four Generic types of Corporate Control(Source: Corporate Strategy: Creating Value in theMulti-business Company Goold, M. Campbell, A. and Alexander, M. Pub: Wiley)

    I. StandAlone Influence II. Linkage Influence

    III. Central Functions and Services I. Corporate Development

  • 7/28/2019 Lecture 06 - Corporate Strategy.pptx

    5/13

    Stand Alone Influence

    Corporates will be involved in agreeing and monitoring performance, approving major corporate

    expenditure and in selection and replacement of business-unit chiefs/ MDs. Some may exercise greater

    Influence in product-market strategies, pricing decisions, overall HRD policies etc. The downside:pressing for wrong targets, starving businesses of resources for worthwhile projects, wasteful

    investments, appointing wrong managers etc.

    Example 1: Dover Corporation

    Size: $ 2.5 bil $ company, 50 different businesses such as elevators, pumps, valves and heat exchangers

    Profile of businesses: Small to medium tech. Niche manufacturing businesses, industrial businesses.

    Key Corporate Function: Managing through heads of the 50 businesses, appointment of the head a veryserious matter, attracts entrepreneurial managers; very supportive corporate office (nearly hand-holding

    Initially). High sense of accountability later.

    Corporate Growth Strategy: Natural business growth of businesses and diversification by takeovers.

    Usually attracts entrepreneurs who wish to exit businesses after having built them up initially.

    Example 2: BTR

    Size: US $ 12 billion UK company involved in aerospace, transmission towers, electric motors, material

    handling, diesel engines, control systems, construction, packaging equipment,Key Corporate Function: Intensive profit planning (not budgeting), close monitoring thru BTR profit

    planning process and periodic stretching of targets, imposes high personal responsibility for performance

    and high motivation to deliver

    Corporate Strategy: Skills in Identifying and integrating acquisitions

  • 7/28/2019 Lecture 06 - Corporate Strategy.pptx

    6/13

  • 7/28/2019 Lecture 06 - Corporate Strategy.pptx

    7/13

    Functional and Services Influence

    The parent provides functional (or services) leadership and cost effective services for business units.

    Generally it is found that this is more a stepping stone to either towards Stand-alone Influence or

    Linkage Influence with respect to functions of marketing, finance etc. But you would find some other

    functions such as R&D may be centralised while certain specialist functions such as Projects aredeployed on a time bound basis to specific businesses.

    Example 1:3M

    Size: $ 14 billion sales from 41 product divisionsMainly to automotive and office products and metals

    working sectors.

    Key Business Philosophy: Innovative new products and whole new businesses can be created by

    effective parenting of the innovation and technical function and thereby internal development of the

    new businesses. A culture of cooperation, internal promotion, long tenure and innovative spirit.

    Technical function is the first among equals

    Corporate Influence through: Facilitation of high quality laboratory and innovation management. For

    example, 3M has a large number of high tech. laboratories that are subject to assessment by the

    corporate through a lab audit process that involves evaluation by other lab directors.

    Example 2: Cooper

    Restructuring: Until recently performing in a lack lustre fashion, Cooper was on the rebound byconsolidating five North American production centres to two.

    Key Function: Manufacturing, concentrates on mature industrial businesses of spark plug, ignition

    systems and other automotive and aircraft components.

    Corporate Philosophy: Many independent businesses serving similar markets can derive synergy

    benefits in manufacturing and distribution, if brought under parental domain.

  • 7/28/2019 Lecture 06 - Corporate Strategy.pptx

    8/13

    Corporate Development

    A pure portfolio approach is adopted. The corporate parent buys and sells (or juggles) businesses like as

    if they are liquid properties. It may, by design, hold businesses for short durations of time, as low as 1-2

    years. With timely acquisitions is the key, this strategy also envisages timely selling of businesses to

    buyers for whom the worth of the properties is more than to the portfolio manager. High focus ontypes of businesses that the company would deal with, astute deal making skills, quick responses, hard-

    nosed short-term cash generation, break-up of assets to fully realise true aset values etc.mark this

    strategy.

    Example 1:Hanson

    Method: First Hanson developed a small highly competent team for identification, screening and deal

    making. It actively sought acquisitions and selected from hundreds about 12 businesses. It developed

    an efficient and speed way to figure out which businesses and managers to keep and managing culture

    change that most acquisitions needed.

    Philosophy: Companies that seek growth from mature businesses tend to destabilise competitive

    conditions, indulge in unnecessary investments and take on excessive costs. This gives opportunity to a

    parent that stresses tight profitability controls. Willingness to sell ny business that is worth more to

    others than we think its worth to us.

    Example: In 1986 Hanson acquired Imperial Group for $ 2.6 billion and within 3 years sold off aportion of the compamy to others for $ 2.3 billion. The company was let with ownership of Imperials

    main tobacco business with an estimated net wroth of 1.3 billion $. Total returns from the deal in three

    years = 1 billion $.

    .

  • 7/28/2019 Lecture 06 - Corporate Strategy.pptx

    9/13

    There could also be combinations of Generic Control

    DuPont*Structure before reorganization

    - DepartmentsFibres Chemicals, Polymers etc.

    - Each independent with the own finance, engineering, HR

    - CorporateSupport function

    - Mainly a Linkage Influence from the corporate towards departments

    - Within each department (which acted like a business), the various products (Lycra) were provided

    Functional or Service support

    DuPontAfter reorganization

    -Move towards the standalone structure with some characteristics oflinkageStrategic Business Unit

    -* based on Streamlining the over-managed company, Carey & von Weiches

    II. Linkage Influence

    III. Central Functions and Services I. Corporate Development

    I. StandAlone Influence

  • 7/28/2019 Lecture 06 - Corporate Strategy.pptx

    10/13

    How did the new structure help?

    Speed:

    - Delayering, closer to the customer

    - Independence of the functional units at the SBU level

    Accountability

    - SBU head has direct responsibility (with of course freedoms too)

    Specificity

    - New Measurement system introduced- Business head in change

    - Blue BookMetrics for each unitrevenue, fixed costs, productivity,

    commitments for the year

    Culture- Step Change eg: Waste Management (Improvements in the Production Process)

    - Measurement bound (Blue book)

    - Targets not to be altered midway through

    - Communication (Fixity of targets, accessibility of CEO, simplicity of communication, rationale for

    acquisitions and divestments

  • 7/28/2019 Lecture 06 - Corporate Strategy.pptx

    11/13

    Blue Ocean Strategy

    Create uncontested markets and make competition irrelevant by:

    Looking Across Alternate Industries: Netjets: Combining Commercial Airlines and

    Aircraft ownership

    Looking Across Strategic Groups within Industries: Champion Pre-fabricated

    homes (Quick installation + Comfort)

    Looking Across Chain of Buyers: Intel (Assemblers to Users)

    Looking Across Complementary Products/ services:Auto companies offering car

    financing

    Looking across industrys functional or emotional orientation: Swatch watches

    (Functional combining with emotional appeal)

    Looking across time:Apples itunes saw the future while observing illegal music

    downloads through Napster, Kazaa, Limewire(Kim and Mauborgne, 2005)

  • 7/28/2019 Lecture 06 - Corporate Strategy.pptx

    12/13

    CapitalLinkages

    Low

    High

    High

    SBUs

    70s-80s

    Conglomerates

    1950-70

    Linkage: Oper/Competence/Customer Need

    Vertically

    Integrated

    Firms

    Core

    Competency

    80s-90s

    (Adapted from Hinterhuber, Long Range Planning, 1994)

    Low

    Idealized Firm

    TowardsInter-

    Organizational

    Systems

    Horz.

    Integrated

    Firms

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    Evolution of Organizational Forms & Strategy Issues

  • 7/28/2019 Lecture 06 - Corporate Strategy.pptx

    13/13

    Thank you