lect17

40
Monopolistic Monopolistic Competition Competition Chapter 17

Upload: govinda-kumar

Post on 17-Jan-2015

222 views

Category:

Education


2 download

DESCRIPTION

 

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Lect17

Monopolistic Monopolistic CompetitionCompetition

Chapter 17

Page 2: Lect17

The Four Types of Market StructureThe Four Types of Market Structure

Monopoly Oligopoly Monopolistic

Competition

Perfect Competitio

n

• Tap water

• Cable TV

• Tennis balls

• Crude oil

• Novels

• Movies

• Wheat

• Milk

Number of Firms?

Type of Products?

Many firms

One firm Few

firms Differentiated products

Identical products

Page 3: Lect17

Types of Imperfectly Types of Imperfectly Competitive MarketsCompetitive Markets

Monopolistic Competition Many firms selling products that are

similar but not identical. Oligopoly

Only a few sellers, each offering a similar or identical product to the others.

Page 4: Lect17

Monopolistic CompetitionMonopolistic Competition

Markets that have some features of competition and some features of monopoly.

Page 5: Lect17

Attributes of Monopolistic Attributes of Monopolistic CompetitionCompetition

Many sellers Product differentiation Free entry and exit

Page 6: Lect17

Many SellersMany SellersThere are many firms competing for the same group of customers.

Product examples include books, CDs, movies, computer games, restaurants, piano lessons, cookies, furniture, etc.

Page 7: Lect17

Product DifferentiationProduct Differentiation

Each firm produces a product that is at least slightly different from those of other firms.

Rather than being a price taker, each firm faces a downward-sloping demand curve.

Page 8: Lect17

Free Entry or ExitFree Entry or Exit

Firms can enter or exit the market without restriction.

The number of firms in the market adjusts until economic profits are zero.

Page 9: Lect17

Monopolistic Competitors in the Monopolistic Competitors in the Short Run...Short Run...

(a) Firm Makes a Profit

Quantity0

Price

Demand

MR

ATC

Profit

MC

Profit- maximizing

quantity

PriceAverage

total cost

Page 10: Lect17

Monopolistic Competitors in the Monopolistic Competitors in the Short Run...Short Run...

Quantity0

Price

Demand

MR

Losses

(b) Firm Makes LossesMC

ATC

Averagetotal cost

Loss- minimizing

quantity

Price

Page 11: Lect17

Monopolistic Competition in the Monopolistic Competition in the Long RunLong Run

Short-run economic profits encourage new firms to enter the market in the long run. This:

Increases the number of products offered. Reduces demand faced by firms already in

the market. Incumbent firms’ demand curves shift to

the left. Demand for the incumbent firms’ products

fall, and their profits decline.

Page 12: Lect17

Monopolistic Competition in the Monopolistic Competition in the Long RunLong Run

Short-run economic losses encourage firms to exit the market in the long run. This:

Decreases the number of products offered. Increases demand faced by the remaining

firms. Shifts the remaining firms’ demand curves

to the right. Increases the remaining firms’ profits.

Page 13: Lect17

The Long-Run EquilibriumThe Long-Run Equilibrium

Firms will enter and exit until the firms are making exactly zero economic profits.

Page 14: Lect17

A Monopolistic Competitor A Monopolistic Competitor in the Long Run...in the Long Run...

Quantity

Price

0

DemandMR

ATC

MC

Profit-maximizingquantity

P=ATC

Page 15: Lect17

Two Characteristics of Long-Run Two Characteristics of Long-Run EquilibriumEquilibrium

As in a monopoly, price exceeds marginal cost. Profit maximization requires marginal

revenue to equal marginal cost. The downward-sloping demand curve

makes marginal revenue less than price.

Page 16: Lect17

Two Characteristics of Long-Run Two Characteristics of Long-Run EquilibriumEquilibrium

As in a competitive market, price equals average total cost. Free entry and exit drive economic

profit to zero.

Page 17: Lect17

Monopolistic versus Perfect Monopolistic versus Perfect CompetitionCompetition

There are two noteworthy differences between monopolistic and perfect competition—excess capacity and markup.

Page 18: Lect17

Excess CapacityExcess Capacity

There is no excess capacity in perfect competition in the long run.

Free entry results in competitive firms producing at the point where average total cost is minimized, which is the efficient scale of the firm.

Page 19: Lect17

Excess CapacityExcess Capacity

There is excess capacity in monopolistic competition in the long run.

In monopolistic competition, output is less than the efficient scale of perfect competition.

Page 20: Lect17

Excess Capacity...Excess Capacity...

Quantity

(a) Monopolistically Competitive Firm(b) Perfectly Competitive Firm

Quantity

Price

P = MR(deman

d curve)

MCATC

Price

Demand

MCATC

Excess capacity

Quantityproduced

Efficientscale

P = MC

Quantityproduced

= Efficientscale

P

Page 21: Lect17

Markup Over Marginal CostMarkup Over Marginal Cost

For a competitive firm, price equals marginal cost.

For a monopolistically competitive firm, price exceeds marginal cost.

Page 22: Lect17

Markup Over Marginal CostMarkup Over Marginal Cost

Because price exceeds marginal cost, an extra unit sold at the posted price means more profit for the monopolistically competitive firm.

Page 23: Lect17

Markup Over Marginal Markup Over Marginal Cost...Cost...

Quantity

(a) Monopolistically Competitive Firm(b) Perfectly Competitive Firm

Quantity

Price

P = MC P = MR(deman

d curve)

MCATC

Quantityproduced

Price

P

Demand

Marginalcost

MCATC

MR

Markup

Quantityproduced

Page 24: Lect17

Monopolistic versus Perfect Monopolistic versus Perfect Competition...Competition...

Quantity

(a) Monopolistically Competitive Firm(b) Perfectly Competitive Firm

Quantity

Price

P = MR(deman

d curve)

MCATC

Quantityproduced

Efficientscale

Price

P

Demand

MCATC

P = MC

Excess capacity

Marginal cost

Markup

MR

Quantity produced = Efficient scale

Page 25: Lect17

Monopolistic Competition and Monopolistic Competition and the Welfare of Societythe Welfare of Society

Monopolistic competition does not have all the desirable properties of perfect competition.

Page 26: Lect17

Monopolistic Competition and Monopolistic Competition and the Welfare of Societythe Welfare of Society

There is the normal deadweight loss of monopoly pricing in monopolistic competition caused by the markup of price over marginal cost.

However, the administrative burden of regulating the pricing of all firms that produce differentiated products would be overwhelming.

Page 27: Lect17

Monopolistic Competition and Monopolistic Competition and the Welfare of Societythe Welfare of Society

Another way in which monopolistic competition may be socially inefficient is that the number of firms in the market may not be the “ideal” one. There may be too much or too little entry.

Page 28: Lect17

Monopolistic Competition and Monopolistic Competition and the Welfare of Societythe Welfare of Society

Externalities of entry include: product-variety externalities. business-stealing externalities.

Page 29: Lect17

Monopolistic Competition and Monopolistic Competition and the Welfare of Societythe Welfare of Society

The product-variety externality: Because consumers get some consumer surplus from the introduction of a new product, entry of a new firm conveys a positive externality on consumers.

Page 30: Lect17

Monopolistic Competition and Monopolistic Competition and the Welfare of Societythe Welfare of Society

The business-stealing externality: Because other firms lose customers and profits from the entry of a new competitor, entry of a new firm imposes a negative externality on existing firms.

Page 31: Lect17

AdvertisingAdvertising

When firms sell differentiated products and charge prices above marginal cost, each firm has an incentive to advertise in order to attract more buyers to its particular product.

Page 32: Lect17

AdvertisingAdvertising

Firms that sell highly differentiated consumer goods typically spend between 10 and 20 percent of revenue on advertising.

Overall, about 2 percent of total revenue, or over $100 billion a year, is spent on advertising.

Page 33: Lect17

AdvertisingAdvertising

Critics of advertising argue that firms advertise in order to manipulate people’s tastes.

They also argue that it impedes competition by implying that products are more different than they truly are.

Page 34: Lect17

AdvertisingAdvertising

Defenders argue that advertising provides information to consumers

They also argue that advertising increases competition by offering a greater variety of products and prices.

The willingness of a firm to spend advertising dollars can be a signal to consumers about the quality of the product being offered.

Page 35: Lect17

Brand NamesBrand Names

Critics argue that brand names cause consumers to perceive differences that do not really exist.

Page 36: Lect17

Brand NamesBrand Names

Economists have argued that brand names may be a useful way for consumers to ensure that the goods they are buying are of high quality. providing information about quality. giving firms incentive to maintain high

quality.

Page 37: Lect17

SummarySummary

A monopolistically competitive market is characterized by three attributes: many firms, differentiated products, and free entry.

The equilibrium in a monopolistically competitive market differs from perfect competition in that each firm has excess capacity and each firm charges a price above marginal cost.

Page 38: Lect17

SummarySummary

Monopolistic competition does not have all of the desirable properties of perfect competition.

There is a standard deadweight loss of monopoly caused by the markup of price over marginal cost.

The number of firms can be too large or too small.

Page 39: Lect17

SummarySummary

The product differentiation inherent in monopolistic competition leads to the use of advertising and brand names.

Critics of advertising and brand names argue that firms use them to take advantage of consumer irrationality and to reduce competition.

Page 40: Lect17

SummarySummary

Defenders argue that firms use advertising and brand names to inform consumers and to compete more vigorously on price and product quality.