lec. 9. budgeting guidelines & performance indicators
DESCRIPTION
HETC Project University Development Grants (UDGs) Training Program for Proposal Writers. Lec. 9. Budgeting Guidelines & Performance Indicators. Budgeting (PP. 7-9). KEY ASPECTS. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
KEY ASPECTSKEY ASPECTS
Proposed Budget should be Based on Solid Rationale reflecting an efficient & effective use of proposed investment as well as the existing resources
Should be accompanied by Strong Arguments & Justifications of Needs
Should Consider the Institutional Commitment & Capacity in Proposing the Budget, and NOT Merely Based on Max Grant Size
ROUND 1 – MAX GRANT SIZEROUND 1 – MAX GRANT SIZE
ROUND 1 – MAX GRANT SIZEROUND 1 – MAX GRANT SIZE
DISTRIBUTION AMONG ENTITIESDISTRIBUTION AMONG ENTITIES
Different Entities of the University will Get a Share of the UDG allocated to each university
proposal should indicate the distribution of funds among different entities of the university using Table C
Recommended that the beneficiary population and the needs of the new and/or under developed faculties/units/centres be considered
Table C. Budget Distribution Table C. Budget Distribution among Different Entitiesamong Different Entities (p.12)(p.12)
DISTRIBUTION AMONG ACTIVITIESDISTRIBUTION AMONG ACTIVITIES
Rational Fund Distribution Across 4 eligible Activities should be ensured
Following Thresholds should be adhered to, in preparation of the budget
ELIGIBLE EXPENDITUREELIGIBLE EXPENDITURE
GOODSGOODS
WORKSWORKS
CONSULTANCIESCONSULTANCIES
OTHER SERVICESOTHER SERVICES
GOODSGOODS
Upgrading Laboratories
Modernizing Teaching & Learning Equipment
Procuring New Equipment
EQUIPMENT, FURNITURE, BOOKS, JOURNALS, SOFTWARE etc.
GOODSGOODS
• Procurement of
Teaching Aids
Textbooks & other related Learning Materials (e.g. journals, magazines, software/CDs etc.)
Furniture for classroom, laboratory & student learning purposes
Budget for Budget for GOODS GOODS 60% 60% of Total Budgetof Total Budget
WORKSWORKS
Limited to Renovation or Expansion/ Upgrading of Existing Physical Facilities
Purchase of Land & Construction of New Buildings – NOT eligible
Budget for (GOODS + WORKS) 90% of Total Budget
Budget for WORKSBudget for WORKS 40% 40% of Total Budgetof Total Budget
CONSULTANCIESCONSULTANCIES
International & Domestic Consultancies
to Assist in Planning & Strategy Development
for Curriculum Development
for Other Academic Activities that Directly Benefit the Programs offered by the university
Budget for CONSULTANCIESBudget for CONSULTANCIES 20% 20% of Total Budgetof Total Budget
OTHER SERVICESOTHER SERVICES
Workshops/Seminars/Guest Lectures for Students & Staff
Local Study Tours/Field Visits/Excursions for Students
Health Education/Student Counseling Programs
Cultural/Sports & other Extra Curricular Activities
Staff and Student Exchange Programs
Field Trips
OTHER SERVICESOTHER SERVICES
Long-Term (> 3 months) Staff Development Activities - NOT Eligible
Domestic Short-Term (< 3 months)
Training Activities Directly Relevant to the Sub-Project - Eligible
Budget for OTHER SERVICESBudget for OTHER SERVICES 20% 20% of Total Budgetof Total Budget
MAX FOR COST MAX FOR COST COMPONENTSCOMPONENTS
Table B. Proposed Budget Table B. Proposed Budget (p.12)(p.12)
CLASSIFICATIONCLASSIFICATION
OUPUT/OUPUT/OUTCOMOUTCOM
EE
PROCESSPROCESS
INPUTINPUT
what universities start withStudentsStaffFacilities
what universities do with inputsCurriculaTeaching & LearningStaff WorkloadUse of TechnologyStaff/Student Ratio
achievements & value-added effects on studentsSkillsAttitudesBehaviourEmploymentIncome
Table D. Performance Indicators Table D. Performance Indicators (p.13)(p.13)
Table D. Performance Indicators Table D. Performance Indicators (p.13)(p.13)
English Language SkillsEnglish Language Skills
IT SkillsIT Skills
HETC – OVERALL OUTCOME HETC – OVERALL OUTCOME INDICATORSINDICATORS
HETC – OVERALL OUTCOME HETC – OVERALL OUTCOME INDICATORSINDICATORS
HETC – OVERALL OUTCOME HETC – OVERALL OUTCOME INDICATORSINDICATORS
HETC – OVERALL OUTCOME HETC – OVERALL OUTCOME INDICATORSINDICATORS
HETC – OVERALL OUTCOME HETC – OVERALL OUTCOME INDICATORSINDICATORS
HETC – OVERALL OUTCOME HETC – OVERALL OUTCOME INDICATORSINDICATORS
HETC – OVERALL OUTCOME HETC – OVERALL OUTCOME INDICATORSINDICATORS
HETC – OVERALL OUTCOME HETC – OVERALL OUTCOME INDICATORSINDICATORS
HETC – OVERALL OUTCOME HETC – OVERALL OUTCOME INDICATORSINDICATORS
HETC – OVERALL OUTCOME HETC – OVERALL OUTCOME INDICATORSINDICATORS
END NOTEEND NOTE
PIs which are abstract or based on complex formulae are not easily interpreted. Simplicity is a virtue and PIs should be transparent and have a good face validity
No of PIs should be kept to minimum, otherwise data collection tends to become an end in itself