learning objects network
DESCRIPTION
Learning Objects Network. Learning Objects Network. U.S. Dept. of Defense Cooperative Research and Development Agreement (CRADA) Association of American Publishers 40 colleges and universities Training companies Corporations. Learning Objects. Who is using them and why? What are they? - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Slide 1
Learning Objects Network
2
Learning Objects Network
U.S. Dept. of Defense Cooperative Research and Development Agreement (CRADA)
Association of American Publishers
40 colleges and universities
Training companies
Corporations
3
Learning Objects
Who is using them and why?
What are they?
Is there a market? Is there a channel?
What does this have to do with DOI?
What is the schedule and who are the participants?
4
Learning Object Communities
SingaporeIMS Asia
PROMETEUS
CEN/ISSS
IMS Australia
ISO/IEC JTC1 SC36
5
Building the FrameworkBuilding the Framework
For the For the
Digital Knowledge EnvironmentDigital Knowledge Environment
Building the FrameworkBuilding the Framework
For the For the
Digital Knowledge EnvironmentDigital Knowledge Environment
SCORM
CourseStructureFormat -
Derived fromAICC
Meta-datadictionaryFrom IEEE
Meta-dataXML BindingBest Practice
From IMS
Content toLMS API
From AICC
Content toLMS data
modelFrom AICC
CONTENT AGGREGATION MODEL
RUN-TIMEENVIRONMENT
7
Multi-Billion Dollar Problem
Each battleship contains 44 tons of paper documentation about which two things are known. . .
It is out of date The right person has never
read it
8
Multi-Billion Dollar Problem
A single plane will hold 1 million plus parts
A helicopter can have a hundred configurations, thousands of sub-contractors, million of parts with weekly updates and over $10 million per year in FedX bills.
9
Who Is Using Learning Objects?
Universities
Corporate training
U.S. Dept. of Defense and NATO
U.S. Federal Agencies (compliance under review)
Corporations— Boeing, Microsoft Cisco Sun Microsystems IBM
10
Why Are Learning Objects Used?
Reduced time in training and course creation (30%)
Reduced costs (30 to 40%)
Interoperable for other purposes (supplies, medical treatment)
Improved understanding and retention
Adapted From: Bloom, B.S. The Two-Sigma Problem: The Search for Methods of Group Instruction as Effective as One-to-One Tutoring. Educational Researcher. 13,4-16 (1984)
# S
tude
nts
Learning Improvements
2
1
ClassroomStudents
ClassroomStudents
CurrentTechnolog
y
CurrentTechnolog
y
Next-Generation Technology
Next-Generation Technology
Average tutored student’s achievement is better than 98% of classroom students
The Learning Technology PotentialThe Learning Technology Potential
12
SCORM Learning ObjectsSharable, Reusable, Interoperable, Locatable, PurchasableSCORM Learning ObjectsSharable, Reusable, Interoperable, Locatable, Purchasable
For reuse of component pieces to be possible, they must be built to a common “object” model
Components that share a common model can be reassembled and reused
AssetWAV
AssetHTML
Fragment
AssetGIF
AssetXML Doc
AssetJavaScriptFunctions
Tagged Asset
AssetFlash Object
AssetJPEG
Raw MediaMeta -Data
AssetWholeWeb Page
Asset
Content Package
“Raw” Assets
Assets are authored and tagged with meta-data – the created assets are first level IP
Learning Objects—From Raw Assets to Something Bigger
14
SCORM/IMS – ONIX Metadata MappingSCORM meta-data element Cardinality M/O/R Value domain Description / comments ONIX element(s) whose content may map directly to
content of this SCORM element
NOTE - The SCORM meta-data elements are identical to those defined in the IMS Learning Resource Meta-data XML Binding Version 1.2, unless otherwise indicated
lom 1..1 M Top-level element containing all others.
general 1..1 M General information about the
resource identifier 0..1 O string Unique global identifier.
Corresponds to DC.Identifier. Scheme to be determined
(possibly DOI?)
DOI?, ProductIdentifier.IDValue?
title 1..1 M Title of the resource. Corresponds to DC.Title
langstring 1.. M string, max 1000 chars
Text string with optional 'xml:lang' attribute. If this
element occurs more than once in its parent, the
xml:lang attribute is required on all occurrences and the
language code values (ISO 639) must be distinct.
DistinctiveTitle, Title.TitleText
AssetWAV
AssetHTML
Fragment
AssetGIF
AssetXML Doc
AssetJavaScriptFunctions
AssetFlash Object
AssetJPEG
AssetWholeWeb Page
AssetWAV
AssetHTML
Fragment
AssetGIF
AssetXML
Doc
AssetJavaScript
Functions
AssetFlash
Object
AssetJPEG
SCO content.htmApi=getAPI();Var result = api.LMSInitialize(“”);Var val = api.LMSGetValue(cmi.abc.xyz”);
Var result = api.LMSFinish(“”);
Assets are authoredinto a (hopefully) reusable learning experience (a Sharable Content Object) – adding new IP in the process
CSF SCO
SCO
SCO
SCO
SCO
SCO
SCO
Tagged Content Aggregation
AssetWAV
AssetHTML
Fragment
AssetGIF
AssetXML Doc
AssetJavaScriptFunctions
AssetFlash Object
AssetJPEG
AssetWholeWeb Page
AssetWAV
AssetHTML
Fragment
AssetGIF
AssetXML
Doc
AssetJavaScript
Functions
AssetFlash
Object
AssetJPEG
SCO content.htmApi=getAPI();Var result = api.LMSInitialize(“”);Var val = api.LMSGetValue(cmi.abc.xyz”);
Var result = api.LMSFinish(“”);
Meta-data
Meta-data
Meta-data
Meta-data
Meta-data
Content objects are authoredinto a specific learning strategy experience – adding still more IP
17
CSF (Content Aggregation) SCO
SCO
SCO
SCO
SCO
SCO
SCOCourse Meta-data
Content Meta-data
Course Meta-data
Course Meta-data
Course Meta-data
Tagged Content Aggregation
Content Package
DOI
DOI
DOI
18
SCORM: Object-Oriented Solution
19
DoD ADL View Of Repositories
Get/PutServices
Storage
SearchServices
Metering
UserProfiles
BusinessRules
Testbed
IndustrySpecific Work
20
Is There a Channel?
LON’s task is to build a working test bed marketplace infrastructure that is a network of content repositories controlled by content owners, that can be accessed from multiple points for network-wide . . .
Search Retrieval Transactions Authentication/verification Rights and rules
21
Core Services
Security
Messaging
Registries TX and AuditAPIs
Network Services
APIsRepositories
(Artesia)DRM User ProfilesBasic Search
Extended Search
UsersAPIsBasic LMS
Community Access Points
Advanced LMS Authoring Tools Other Tools
Legend
First Phase Later Phase
3rd PARTY LON + Partners ADL / UsersLON LON + Users
High-Level Block Architecture
22
One-to-One Agreements
Content UsersExchangesContent Owners
Defense
Education
Energy
Finance
Government
Healthcare
Legal
Manufacturing
Publishing
Defense
Education
Energy
Finance
Government
Healthcare
Legal
Manufacturing
Publishing
23
Many-to-Many Relationships
Content UsersExchangesContent Owners
LONDOI
Registry and
AuthenticatedInfrastructure
Defense
Education
Energy
Finance
Government
Healthcare
Legal
Manufacturing
Publishing
Defense
Education
Energy
Finance
Government
Healthcare
Legal
Manufacturing
Publishing
Re-purpose, Distribute and Update
24
Is There A Market?
The Role of “Learning Objects” Has Changed Learning communities (k-12, higher education, continuing
education, corporate training, just-in-time instruction) Instruction sources (government agencies, companies,
medical services, etc.) Documentation and specifications Supply management, ordering and shipping Knowledge management systems Reference and research
25
What Is Role of DOI?
Phase 1 Raw assets (text, video, audio, simulations) Learning objects (single courses) Documents Physical objects
Phase 2 Personal ID and Profiles (learning, medical, credit, etc.) Knowledge management Supply and channel management Transactions
26
Core Architecture
Metadata repository and DOIs
Profile repository (trust) and DOIs
Transaction tracking and DOIs
Hard goods metadata repository, DOIs, and order/supply
27
Next Steps
Accelerated Development of Learning Objects and Infrastructure
Commercial transactions now underway
Test repositories installed
Network infrastructure being built out
Research CRADA project selecting content users, providers, processes, legal structure
28
Schedule
Test repositories at co-labs and some publishers in place
Content selection, design, etc. by Nov. 10
Preliminary infrastructure by late November
Operational infrastructure early next year (?)
Evaluations and reports (?)
Dynamic sequencing, wireless, etc.
29
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Developers Guide To SCORM
LON Repository Test Bed
LON Hand Held Delivery2.0 SCORM Architecture
Scope Document
Coordinated Test Bed - CMU & National Guard BureauLON Content Conversion/Repository Test
ADL 2001
SCORM1.1 Release
SCORM1.2 Release
SCORM1.3 Release
SCORM2.0 Release
IMS Content Packaging Test & Evaluation Phase
IMSTB
IMSTB
IMSTB
ADLPlugFest 4
Cont. Pack.
ADLPlugFest 5
Repositories
ADLPlugFest 6
Data ModelsSeq.&Nav
1. Content PackagingApplication Profiles;2. New LOM & Binding
Repository Functional Requirements Repository Query Services
Seq.& Navigation, Skins, Learning Models
SCORM 2.0 Test & Evaluation Phase
2.0 SCORM Advanced Research-Performance Support
-Intelligent Tutoring Systems-Simulations
IMSTB
Query ServicesApplication Profiles
New Data ModelsSeq. & Nav.Skins, etc.
1. Content Model - Meta-data - XML Binding - CSF2. Run-time Environment - API - Data Model
IEEE AICCIEEEIEEE IEEEAICC AICC
Business Rules:
LON and Content Owners
External Services: Consulting, File Conversion, Certification