learjet 45xr vs. citation xls+ - premier jet...

VS. PHENOM 300

2013

LEARJET HAS VISION

Bombardier is in a stronger

financial situation than Cessna:

Learjet 70: Spacious seating for 6

provides enhanced comfort

Faster and burns comparable fuel to the

much smaller Phenom 300

Despite flying faster, the Learjet 70 has

a longer range than the P300

Save over $100,000 in operating costs

alone in 5 years

Part 25 certification ensures the

following:

LEARJET EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Learjet 70 Phenom 300

Jam proof

flight controls Not jam proof

Bird-strike

tested Not tested

Stringent

icing tests

Less stringent

icing

requirements

Fiscal year 2012

Note: Excludes very light jets, ACJs, BBJs and Embraer Lineage 1000 Source: Manufacturer disclosures and Bombardier estimates

BOMBARDIER CAPTURED MORE ORDERS

THAN THE REST OF THE INDUSTRY COMBINED

2012 Industry Net Orders

+329

-10 14

58 62 70

343

TRUSTED LEARJET NAME

Gov’t Montenegro Gov’t Pakistan

COCKPIT

• Bombardier signature Vision* Flight Deck

• Brand new Garmin G5000 state-of-the-art avionics suite

BOMBARDIER VISION FLIGHT DECK ON A LEARJET AIRCRAFT

* Trademark(s) of Bombardier Inc. or its subsidiaries.

The LEARJET 70 features a standard synthetic vision system.

Provides the pilots with VFR-like visibility even in IFR conditions

SYNTHETIC VISION

NEW GRAPHICAL FLIGHT PLANNING FEATURES CONTROLLED

BY A UNIQUE TOUCH SCREEN

• Unique glass touch screen controller

Infrared grid technology

• Graphical flight planning

Reduced Pilot Workload

GARMIN WINS TOP HONORS ON AVIONICS PRODUCT SUPPORT

• In the cockpit avionics sector,

Garmin takes top honors for how it

looks after its customers.

• Garmin 1st for 8 years.

THE MOST COMFORTABLE

CABIN IN ITS CLASS

LEARJET 70 INTERIOR FEATURES

• Spacious, individual seating for 6 passengers

o Can seat 7 with the standard belted lavatory

• Flat floor throughout the entire cabin provides

enhanced comfort

The LEARJET 70 provides comfortable seating for 6 passengers

FLOOR PLAN

*Finished cabin dimensions measured from actual drawings of cross sections

PHENOM 300

• No sink available

• Optional lavatory sink

• 1 extra belted

lavatory seat

• Extended lavatory

with standard sink

and belted seat

The LEARJET 70 provides 3” more cabin height,

more head and shoulder space, and a flat floor

CROSS-SECTION

4’10”

(1.47m)

5’ (1.52m)

3’2” (0.96m)


PHENOM 300

The PHENOM 300 stepped aisle provides uncomfortable seating

and increases the risk of tripping

OBSERVATIONS ON THE PHENOM 300


• The dropped aisle is steep and narrow

o Movement is more difficult around the cabin, especially in the vicinity of

the lavatory

THE FASTEST AIRCRAFT IS

ALSO THE MOST EFFICIENT

LEARJET 70: THE FAST AND THE EFFICIENT

While the LEARJET 70 is the fastest aircraft in its class,

it is also the one with the best fuel economy

*Speeds based on mid-cruise weight (BOW + 4 pax+ ½ full fuel). Mission based on 4 pax, zero wind, 436 kts for both aircraft and NBAA IFR 100 nm fuel reserves

+12%

Phenom 300

424 kts

385 kts

458 kts

430 kts

High speed cruise

Long range cruise

Learjet’s long range

cruise is the

competitor’s high

speed cruise

3,674 lbs

-5%

Phenom 300

3,886 lbs

Block fuel

4 pax

1,500 nm still air

similar speed (436 kts)

Learjet’s fuel burn

advantageously

compares to the much

smaller Phenom 300

Bett

er

Sp

eed

Bett

er

Fu

el

Flight time (1,900 nm)

LEARJET 70 4:38

PHENOM 300 5:02

On a typical trans-European flight,

the LEARJET 70 saves 30 minutes over the PHENOM 300

SAVE TIME

SAVE OVER 20 MINUTES

ON THE

Assumptions 4 passengers, 2 crew (200lbs each) 3% airways allowance ISA conditions en route NBAA IFR (100 NM) fuel reserves Standard Configuration BOW

MORE RANGE, FASTER SPEED

Assumptions 3% airway allowance 6 passengers (at 200 lbs), 2 crew 85% Boeing annual winds ISA conditions en route L70: 432 kts cruise speed P300: 417 kts cruise speed NBAA IFR (100 NM) fuel reserves Optimum climb, cruise and descent Level hard surface, dry paved runway Specific departure requirements not considered

Phenom 300

MORE RANGE, FASTER SPEED

Phenom 300


THE MORE RANGE, FASTER SPEED

Phenom 300


LARGER AIRCRAFT FOR SIMILAR FUEL

AND MAINTENANCE COSTS

Cost Assumptions (5 Year Average):

• Fuel flow (takeoff to touchdown)

based on 600 nm mission, standard

configuration, similar cruise speeds and

NBAA IFR (100 nm) R fuel reserves.

• Learjet 70 parts based on Smart Parts and

labor based on scheduled inspections.

• Phenom 300 parts and labor based on

Embraer EEC Enhanced program,

estimated in USD. Engines costs based on

manufacturer program.

• Actual costs may vary. All costs in USD.

$288

Airframe

Engines

Phenom 300

$1,083 $1,001

-3%

$1,641

$352

Fuel

$1,599

$170

$346

Save over $ 100, 000 in operating costs alone over 5 years

LEARJET 70: SUPERIOR BRAKES

16,865 lbs.

+2,335 lbs.

Phenom 300

19,200 lbs. 2,660 ft.

Phenom 300

2,681 ft.

-1%

Heavier landing weight… …Similar landing distances

The superior carbon brakes of the Learjet 70 combined with brake-by-wire

technology enable it to land in a similar distance to the Phenom 300

LEARJET 70: HIGHER CERTIFICATION STANDARDS

LEARJET 70 Phenom 300 CJ3 CJ4 XLS+

• Trailing link design

o Smoother taxiing and landings

• Independent Anti-Skid Systems on each

wheel

• Dual Tires & Wheels

o Redundancy

o Dual Carbon Brakes

o Designed to stop a 36,000 lb. aircraft

o “Brake-by-wire” technology

Aircraft fitted with dual wheel assembly

CLICK TO EDIT MASTER

TITLE STYLE THE TECHNOLOGY BEHIND A

PART 25 AIRCRAFT

THE LEARJET 70 ADHERES TO STRINGENT

CERTIFICATION STANDARDS

Examples of the demanding standard the Learjet 70 aircraft meets:

• 16G seat certification

o improves seat attachment and restraint system loading

• Higher bird strike tolerances

o demand the ability to continue safe flight following impact events

• Flight control redundancy

o ensures control of the aircraft in the event of system failure or jamming

• Degradation applied in takeoff performance

o more accurately depicts rejected takeoff performance

• More stringent ice testing requirements

First business jet certified to both FAA and JAA standards

• Certified to FAA, 14CFR Part 25, amendment 1 to 77

o HIGHER THAN AIRBUS 330/340

• Certified to JAA, JAR 25 change 13

o SAME AS BOEING 777

The LEARJET 70 certification levels testify to the technological benchmark

the aircraft represents and the safety and reliability its operators can expect

The LEARJET 70 certification levels testify to the technological benchmark

the aircraft represents and the safety and reliability its operators can expect

THE LEARJET 70 ADHERES TO STRINGENT

CERTIFICATION STANDARDS

Bird strike standards for a 4 lb. bird

on the windshield and wing leading edges

16 G dynamic

seat certification

Bird strike standards

for a 8 lb. bird

on the empennage

leading edges

Stringent ice testing

Degradation applied in takeoff

and landing performance

in accordance with FAR 25

Amendment 92

Redundancy in systems:

dual primary flight controls

CERTIFICATION BASIS

“This AC uses terminology similar to AC 25.1309-1A. However, the specific means of

compliance for § 25.1309 of part 25 are defined differently due to the higher level of safety

required for transport category airplanes.” 1

• Per the FAA’s own documentation, a Part 25 or TRANSPORT CATEGORY

AIRPLANES require a higher level of safety:

1. AC 23.1309-1D System safety analysis and assessment for Part 23 airplanes

Part 23 Part 25

NORMAL, UTILITY, ACROBATIC, AND

COMMUTER CATEGORY AIRPLANES

TRANSPORT CATEGORY AIRPLANES

• Phenom 100/300

• CJ1 to CJ4

• Premier 1A

• Learjet 70/75

• All other business jets

Part 23 Part 25

Bird Strike

No bird strike requirements Empennage structure and

aircraft systems must

withstand the impact

of an 8 lb. bird at Vc

Icing

Aircraft must be “controllable”

with icing on unprotected surfaces

1) All handling tests must

be repeated with 3 in. of icing

on unprotected surfaces

2) Aircraft must demonstrate it can

fly with an additional 1.5 in. of icing

on all normally protected surfaces

Takeoff

1) One (1) second recognition time

2) New tires

3) New brakes

1) Three (3) seconds recognition time

2) 50% worn tires

3) 90% worn brakes

The LEARJET 70 Part 25:

More stringent certification requirements

EXAMPLES OF CERTIFICATION DIFFERENCES

BETWEEN PART 23 AND PART 25

EXAMPLE: FLIGHT CONTROL SYSTEM REDUNDANCY

Phenom 300 Learjet 70

Part 23.671 Part 25.671

(A) Each control must operate easily,

smoothly, and positively enough

to allow proper performance

of its functions

(B) Controls must be arranged and

identified to provide for convenience

in operation and to prevent

the possibility of confusion and

subsequent inadvertent operation

…(C) The airplane must be shown

by analysis, tests, or both to be

capable of continued safe flight and

landing after any of the failures or

jamming in the flight control system

and surfaces…

FLIGHT CONTROL SYSTEM REDUNDANCY

Phenom 300 Part 23.671

No redundancy required

Pitch Control System

If either elevator mechanical

control circuit jams, the two circuits

can be disconnected by pulling

the disconnect Tee-handle

ELEV DISC, located at the forward

left side of the center pedestal.

The aircraft can then be controlled

with the unjammed elevator

Roll Control System

If the aileron controls become jammed,

the pilot control wheel can be disconnected

from the aileron control cables and airplanes

roll can be controlled with spoilerons alone.

The copilot control wheel remains connected

to the aileron control system

Learjet 70 Part 25.671

Bombardier is in a stronger

financial situation than Cessna:

Learjet 70: Spacious seating for 6

provides enhanced comfort

Faster and burns comparable fuel to the

much smaller Phenom 300

Despite flying faster, the Learjet 70 has

a longer range than the P300

Save over $100,000 in operating costs

alone in 5 years

Part 25 certification ensures the

following:

LEARJET EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Learjet 70 Phenom 300

Jam proof

flight controls Not jam proof

Bird-strike

tested Not tested

Stringent

icing tests

Less stringent

icing

requirements

Document produced by the Sales Engineering Group, Business Aircraft. All data in the document is based on available or published information and is for discussion purposes only. By this document, Bombardier Inc.

does not intend to make, and is not making, any offer, commitment, representation or warranty of any kind whatsoever. All data are subject to change without prior notice. The final configuration and performance

of the aircraft shall be the specifications that are contractually agreed to.

learjet 45xr vs. citation xls+ - premier jet...

Documents