l&e law and finance 2012

Upload: deepak-gaur

Post on 06-Apr-2018

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/3/2019 L&E Law and Finance 2012

    1/8

    1

    School of Economics, Finance and Management

    MSc Law and Economics (ECONM2027)

    Brief Notes on Law and Finance

    1. Quick background on Legal Families

    The two big legal families are:

    Civil Law Common Law

    Primary features of civil law are:

    Origin based on Roman Law and CodeNapoleon

    Historically concerned with preventingdisorderextensive regulation to control it byensuring judges follow the states objectives

    Developed in continental Europe Based on general abstract principles regardless

    of case

    Codified with detailed definitions

  • 8/3/2019 L&E Law and Finance 2012

    2/8

    2

    Each rule sets out lengthy enumerations ofspecific applications or exceptions

    There are three sub families of civil law(French, German and Scandinavian)

    Primary features of common law are:

    Origin based on traditional English Law Developed to control the power of the state(as represented initially by monarchy) Evolved in current form from 11th century

    onwards

    Doctrine of stare decisis (translation - stickto decisions, i.e., essentially precedent

    based) Based on reasoning from case to case Process of distinguishing (judges do not

    have to apply precedent if alleged precedent

    is significantly different from current case)

    Judge based law

    English Common Law and French and German

    Civil Law have been exported throughout the

    world.

    See Annex 1

  • 8/3/2019 L&E Law and Finance 2012

    3/8

    3

    2. Is the distinction between the legal families

    significant and permanent?

    Balas, La Porta, Lopez-de-Silanes and Shleifer

    (2008 paper: The divergence of legal procedures)

    suggest that it is.

    See Annex 2, 3 and 4

    (taken from their paper).

    They look at two examples:

    Bounced cheque Eviction of tenant.

    Uses seven measures to create an index of

    formalism they show that civil law has more

    formalism than common law.

    Their evidence (from 1950 onwards) shows no

    convergence if anything there appears to bedivergence.

  • 8/3/2019 L&E Law and Finance 2012

    4/8

    4

    3. Legal origin theory

    Annex 5 gives La Porta, Lopez-de-Silanes, and

    Shleifers view of the relationship between legalorigin and outcomes.

    Common law appears to give greater protection to

    outside investors and creditors relative to civil

    common law.

    If true, what might be reasons?

    One strand goes back to strength of thestate versus individual

    Another suggests that common law isbetter able to change to meet new

    situations

    So what follows if it is true?

    Better protection leads to better developedfinancial markets. See Annex 6, 7 8 and 9.

    Less well documented but growing view thatdeveloped financial markets are good for

    growth. See Annex 10.

  • 8/3/2019 L&E Law and Finance 2012

    5/8

    5

    Ownership concentration is response to thesedifferences in investor protection (the

    concentration of ownership is highest in civil

    law countries).

    4. All the above is hotly disputed.

    Specific criticisms include:

    Poor data Reverse causality Omitted variables Not what is written but the implementation of

    it

    See Annex 11

  • 8/3/2019 L&E Law and Finance 2012

    6/8

    6

    5. Two Alternative views

    5a Endowments Theory

    There are arguments that it is the fundamental

    initial endowments that matter, e.g., Beck,

    Demirguc-Kunt, and Levine (2003) argue (using

    settler mortality and latitude as a proxy for initial

    endowments) that it is initial endowments that

    matter.

    See Annex 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16.

    5b. Trust

    Franks et al (2008) disagree with underlying thesis

    about legal origin and claim that there is little

    evidence once one looks in detail.

    They claim dispersion came first (formalinvestor protection only emerged in the secondhalf of the century), claiming 1948 was the

    key date and that there was little protection in

    UK at all until end of 1920s - yet there was

    significant dispersion of ownership at this time

    and one could argue that the biggest changes

    came before 1950.

  • 8/3/2019 L&E Law and Finance 2012

    7/8

    7

    See Annex 17

    They also claim protection came throughstatute not through common law.

    They claim the key issue is trust (arguing thatlocal stock exchanges and shareholders

    distance from the company matter in creating

    trust).

    See Annex 18 and 19

  • 8/3/2019 L&E Law and Finance 2012

    8/8

    8

    References:

    (In each case you will probably need to press ctrl when you click)

    1. The Economic Consequences of Legal Origins Rafael La Porta,

    Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes, and Andrei Shleifer Journal of Economic

    Literature 2008, 46:2, 285332

    http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1028081

    Contains Annex 1, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10.

    2. Law, endowments, and finance Thorsten Beck, Asli Demirguc-Kunt, and Ross Levine. Journal of Financial Economics Volume 70,

    Issue 2, November 2003, Pages 137-181

    http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=321355

    (click on NBER subscribers download)

    Contains Annex 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16.

    3. Ownership: Evolution and Regulation, Julian Franks, Colin Mayer,and Stefano Rossi, inReview of Financial Studies (2008).

    http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=354381

    Contains Annex 17, 18 and 19.

    http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1028081http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1028081http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/0304405Xhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=PublicationURL&_tockey=%23TOC%235938%232003%23999299997%23466522%23FLA%23&_cdi=5938&_pubType=J&view=c&_auth=y&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=10a8515c9b360c1d2840c8e9ef0df4cahttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=PublicationURL&_tockey=%23TOC%235938%232003%23999299997%23466522%23FLA%23&_cdi=5938&_pubType=J&view=c&_auth=y&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=10a8515c9b360c1d2840c8e9ef0df4cahttp://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=321355http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=321355http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=354381http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=354381http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=354381http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=321355http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=PublicationURL&_tockey=%23TOC%235938%232003%23999299997%23466522%23FLA%23&_cdi=5938&_pubType=J&view=c&_auth=y&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=10a8515c9b360c1d2840c8e9ef0df4cahttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=PublicationURL&_tockey=%23TOC%235938%232003%23999299997%23466522%23FLA%23&_cdi=5938&_pubType=J&view=c&_auth=y&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=10a8515c9b360c1d2840c8e9ef0df4cahttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/0304405Xhttp://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1028081