layout planning of chemical industrial parks 11/02/2014 page 1 raghu babu nukala deutsche...
TRANSCRIPT
1
Page 111/02/2014
Raghu Babu NukalaDeutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH
Layout Planning of
Chemical Industrial Parks
Page 2
Layout Planning of Chemical Industrial Parks: Some Core Issues
11/02/2014
» Improper siting of chemical industrial parks
» Unplanned development and haphazard land use changes
around Industrial Parks
» Disaster management aspects not integrated into Layout/Site
Master Plans of Industrial Parks
» Lack of guidelines, criteria etc. for planning of industrial parks
» Lack of capacities for proper layout/site master planning of
industrial parks
2
Page 311/02/2014
Si te
Site Selection
Site Master Plan
Contents of the Presentation:
Layout/Site Master Planning• Existing standards/criteria/
guidelines for planning• Case examples• Some criteria for planning
Siting aspects• Industrialisation trends• Siting approaches• Siting criteria
Recommendations
Page 411/02/2014
Layout/Site Master Planning of Chemical Industrial Parks
S i t e
Site Selection
Site Master Plan
3
Page 511/02/2014
Industrial Park Level:
» Indian Green Building Council (IGBC) - Green
SEZ Rating System, Green Townships (India),
Green Landscape
» UN indicators for sustainable development
(UNDESA 2007)
» OECD Green Economy Indicators
» Chinese Eco-Industrial Park Standard
» Chinese ISC Guide for Low Carbon Industrial
Zones
» Indicators of Kaiserslautern University of
Technology
» Indian Green Building Council (IGBC): Green
SEZ Rating System
» DGNB (German Sustainable Building Council)
Some Reference Criteria
» Guidelines for Planning Mega
Project, Punjab
» Guidelines for Planning Industrial
Estates, 2011, Gujarat
» Industrial Policy 2007, Tamil Nadu
» Industrial Policy 2011, Haryana
» Master Plan for Delhi – 2021
Industry/Building Level:
» Green Star Rating (Green Building Council of
Australia)
» Energy Conservation Building Code (Ministry
of Power, India)
» Indian Green Building Council (IGBC): Green
Homes, Green Existing Buildings, Green
Factory Building, High-performance
commercial buildings (India)
» LEED (Leadership in Energy and
Environmental Design) Rating System, USA
Page 611/02/2014
» Site selection: site preservation & restoration
» Site planning & design: innovation & design, adaptability & future-
proof
» Resource efficiency (energy, water, materials) - renewable energy;
recycle/reuse of water, materials, energy etc.
» Minimise environmental impacts: wastes, waste water,
ecosystem
» Social infrastructure
» Improved business performance, staff productivity and well-being
» Buildings – materials used, energy efficiency etc.
» Quality site management and administration
Summary of Reference Criteria
Disaster aspects are not reflected in the available Industrial Park criteria/rating systems
4
Page 711/02/2014
Green SEZ Rating System for Industrial Estates - IGBC
» Site preservation and restoration
» Reduced use of fossil fuels
» Energy efficiency
» Water efficiency
» Handling of solid waste
» Materials & Resources
» Innovation & Design Process
Page 811/02/2014
» Site Selection and Planning
» Water Conservation
» Energy Conservation
» Material Conservation
» Indoor Environment Quality and
Occupational Health
» Innovation & Design Process
Green Factory Buildings (IGBC)
5
Page 911/02/2014
» Environmental quality (effects on the global and local environment;
resource use; waste generation)
» Process quality (participatory planning, detailed and integrated
planning, planning process)
» Socio-cultural and functional quality (social quality; health, comfort
and user satisfaction; functionality; design quality
» Technical quality (technical infrastructure – energy, wastes, etc.;
technical quality – transportation system etc.)
» Economic quality (life-cycle costs of buildings, site development/plan
efficiency etc.)
DGNB Germany Criteria for Industrial Estate Sustainability Certification
Page 1011/02/2014
Disaster Management Provisions for Chemical Industrial Park Planning (Germany’s Major Accidents Ordinance
to Industrial Estates)
» “Closed” Industrial Estate: Industrial Estate with common fences,
shared emergency management and shared infrastructure
» Coordinated emergency response and integrated emergency
management
» Joint security service
» Joint emergency management for the whole Park
» Joint fire brigade organised by infrastructure operator
» Fence at the perimeter of the whole Park
» High risk/vulnerability areas may need additional security
Source; Guidance Application of the Major Accidents Ordinance to Industrial Estates (SFK-
GS-44), German Federal Ministry for Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety
6
Page 11
Case Example: Hoechst Chemical/Industrial Park (Germany)
» Infrastructure company (owned by major operators) responsible
for emergency management and fire brigade
» Joint Disaster Management Plan for the Park
» Joint command centre
» 24hrs/7 days service of “Emergency Managers” and medical
centre
» Senior managers from Park users act as Emergency Director in
case of major incidents
» Internal command with Park Fire Chief and Emergency Director.
Authority may take over in case of outside impact.
» Costs are shared according to risks
Page 1212
Case Example: Bayer Chemical Park, Leverkusen (Germany)
Compact; Well laid out road network; Well defined industrial
blocks/zones, Entry/exit points, Separate provisions for trucks and
passenger cars
7
Page 13
Case Example: Shanghai Chemical Industrial Park (SCIP) (China)
11/02/2014
» Emergency Response Centre
» Fire fighting station
» Centralised Industrial Gases: CO2, H2, O2, N2,
Plant air, Instrumentation air
» Centralised Co-generation Plant: Electricity-
600,000kw; Steam:660t/h
» Centralised Incineration facility for hazardous
wastes
» Jetty ,Tank Form and Pipe Racks – for distribution
of chemicals etc.
Page 1411/02/2014
» Information collection and transmission
» Local safety monitoring
» Accident prevention, command and management.
» Public safety/security
» First aid
» Fire Fighting
» etc.
Case Example: Shanghai Chemical Industrial Park (SCIP), Shanghai, China
SCIP Emergency Response Center
8
Page 15
1
Medium hazard industry
High hazard industry
Low hazardindustry
Low hazard activity at periphery
Green belt/buffer
Green belt/buffer
Green belt/buffer
Green belt/buffer
Green belt/buffer
Emergency exit
Emergency exit
Emergency exit Emergency
exit
Emergency exit
Fire station
Container terminal
Disaster management facility
Truck parking
Case Example: APSEZ Visakhapatnam
Page 16
Layout/Site Master Plans Provisions for Disaster Risk Management
11/02/2014
» Zoning of industries as per disaster risks
» Adequate entry/exits, emergency exits
» Proper road network (IRC standards) and circulation system, Access
controls
» Separate provisions for passenger and goods traffic, hierarchy of parking
– overnight stay, temporary parking, loading/unloading
» Buffer zones, green belts – industrial park level, zone level, plant level
» Fencing for the whole Park and for sub-zones (as per requt.)
» Emergency Response Centre
» Fire station
» Common infrastructure – tank forms, pipe racks, waste incinerator,
cogeneration plant etc.
9
Page 1711/02/2014
� Specify “disaster management” requirements for
Industrial Parks
� Develop Guidelines for integration of “disaster
management” aspects into Industrial Park Planning
� Develop criteria on “disaster management” for
integration into Industrial Park “Rating Systems”
� Undertake capacity building (organisational and
individual) on planning of industrial parks
Suggestions:
Page 1811/02/2014
Understanding
The Industrialisation Trends
S i t e
Site SelectionSite Master Plan
10
Page 1919
IndustrialClusters
(textiles, electroplating, tanneries etc.)
Special Investment
Regions (SIRs)
(> 100 sq.km)
PCPIRs (Petroleum,
Chemicals & Petrochemical
Investment Regions)
( ≈ 250 sq.km)
National
Investment and
Manufacturing
Zones INIMZs)
(≈ 5,000 Ha)
Industrial Corridors
(e.g., DMIC; BMIC etc.)
Types of Industrial Parks
Page 20
» DMIC: 1,483 km long, 300 km
wide
» Area under Influence: 14% &
Population: 17% of the country
» Total Population: 173.4 Million
» Total Workers: 68.36 Million
» Total 82 Districts of Six States
within the Influence Area
(excluding MP)
» 24 industrial nodes have been
proposed along the DMIC
Example: Delhi-Mumbai Industrial Corridor (DMIC)
Haryana
Rajasthan
Gujarat
Maharashtra
Madhya Pradesh
Uttar
Pradesh
Uttaranchal
Arabian Sea
Dadri
J.N.Port
End Terminals
DFC Alignment
11
Page 21
AP PCPIRNational Highway 5Rail Network
SEZ
ONGC Refinery & Petrochemical Unit (1,200 acres)
Gangavaram Port
Visakhapatnam Port
Pharma City
(2120 acres)
Logistics Corridor
Coastal Pipeline Corridor
NTPC Thermal Power Plant
Visakhapatnam Airport
Hetro Drugs- USFDA Chemical Zone (400 acres)
SEZ
HPCL – Phase I & II
HPCL NapthaCracker & Aromatic Complex (3500 acres)
Example: Andhra Pradesh Petroleum, Chemicals and Petro Chemical Investment Region APPCPIR)
Page 22
Kutch
Jamnagar
Porbandar
JunagadhAmreli
Bhavnagar
Rajkot
Surendranagar
Banaskantha
Patan
MehsanaHimmatnagar
Kheda Panchmahal
Dahod
Vadodara
BharuchNarmada
Surat
Navsari
Valsad
Anand
Gandhinagar
Ahmedabad
Knowledge corridor
Chemicals, petrochem. pharma, textiles and engineering
Industrial corridor(DMIC)
Gujarat International Finance-Tec City
Bio-Tech cluster
Soda ash and salt-based industries, cement and steel pipes
182 industrial estates across Gujarat
Soda ash and salt based
Engineering and ceramics
18 Captive Ports along 1600 km coastline across Gujarat
Special Investment Region (SIR)
Petroleum and brass parts
Savli Biotech Park
60 special economic zones (SEZs) across Gujarat
Example: Industrial Areas in Gujarat
12
Page 2311.02.2014Example: Industrial Areas in Gujarat in DMIC
Page 2411/02/2014
� New industrial areas need land use planning (Site Master Plans,
Development Plans/Regional Plans) integrating “disaster
management” aspects
� Existing industrial areas too need retrofitting integrating
“disaster management” aspects
(over 2,000 industrial estates exist in the country)
Suggestions:
13
Page 2511/02/2014
S i t e
Site SelectionSite Master Plan
Understanding
Siting Aspects
Page 26
Human habitat
Ecosystem service areas: Forests
Ground water
Surface water bodies
Public water supply areas
Eco sensitive zones –national parks, wildlife sanctuaries etc.
Monuments, historic places
Scenic areas, nature conservation areas
Atmospheric emissions
Water pollution
Solid/haz. wastes
Disaster risks
Resource consumption
Source Receiver
Energy consumption
Impact
Potential
Agri. Lands
Proper site selection is important to minimise disaster risks
14
Page 2711/02/2014
Associated Activities/Land Uses with Industrial Parks and Investment Zones
Industrial
Industrial
Industrial
Industrial
Industrial
Industrial
There is need for planning and regulating land uses around industrial areas for minimising disaster risks
Page 28
Land Use Planning of Industrial Areas
11/02/2014
The state / local level authorities such as:
» industrial Development Corporations
» infrastructure Development Boards
are identifying locations for:
» industrial estates,
» investment zones / regions, and
» industrial corridors, and
preparing development / master plans. (e.g.
Dholera Special Investment region of DMIC by
the Gujarat Infrastructure Development Board)
15
Page 29
Example: Dholera SIR (Gujarat)
Source; Presentation on “Industrial Park Development In the State of Gujarat”, by Gujarat Infrastructure
Development Board, Oct 2013
Total Area
(including 22
villages)
90,370 ha
Total Jobs 827,000
Industrial, Tourism &
other Jobs
343,000
Support Jobs 484,000
Supported population 2.5 million
Population living in
DSIR2.0 million
Page 3011/02/2014
» There are 1,666 MAH units in India.
» Out** of 602 districts in India, 263 districts have MAH units.
» 170 districts have clusters of more than 5 MAH units
(hazardous/industrial pockets).
** Source: Dr. Anil K. Gupta, Associate Professor, Sreeja S. Nair, Assistant Professor, NIDM, New Delhi;
Presentation on “Siting of Industries in a Multi-hazard Environment- Risk Mapping and Knowledge
Management’”,
Declare Major Hazard Vulnerable Areas and set timeframe for preparation of Land Use Plans by state agencies� Areas with “Major Accident Hazard” industries � Areas with major accident hazard activities, other than industries: include areas
with gas/chemical pipelines, ports/harbours, storages of chemicals etc.� Areas prone to natural disasters
16
Page 31
� All forests
� National parks,
Sanctuaries and other
critically ecologically
sensitive areas
� Monuments
� Tourist sites
� High land capability areas
� High physiography areas
� Organised bathing places
� Flood prone areas etc.
Site Selection Approach: Example of Zoning Atlas of CPCB
Step 1: Elimination approach - Mapping of areas to be avoided
Page 3211.02.2014
LegendLowHighMedium
Land Use Sensitivity
High
Medium
Low
Dispersion Sensitivity
L e
Disp.
Land Use
High Med Low
High High High High
Medium High Med Med
Low High Med LowL e g en d
L o wHi g hM e d iu mS en s i t i v e Zo n e s
Air Pollution Sensitivity
Risks due siting of air polluting industries
Overlay Matrix
Step 2: Risk assessment
17
Page 3311.02.2014
Leg end
All a ir po llu ting indu stries
Me dium air po lluting in du stries
Se ns it ive zo ne s
All w ater p ollu ting indu strie s
All w ater a nd a ir po llutin g ind ustries
All w ater p ollu ting a nd m ediu m air p o llu tin g ind ustrie s
Me dium wa ter po llutin g indu stries
All a ir and me dium w ater po llu ting indu strie s
Me dium air and w ater pollu tin g ind ustrie s
Mo derate w ater p ollu ting ind ustrie s
All a ir po llu ting and m ode rate w ate r po llu ting in dustries
Mo detate w a te r and m e dium air pollu ting in dustries
Step 3: Site suitability assessment for industries
Page 3411/02/2014
Step 1: Exclusion Analysis: Conservation areas; Historical and
archeological sites; Wetlands; Landslide prone areas; Federal lands; Natural reserves; Soils of agricultural significance; Coastal barriers; Schools etc.
Step 2: Inclusion Analysis: Flat land (<21% slope), Process water supply -
less than 3 miles; Proximity to major Highway Network – less than 3 miles; Accessibility to a 115KV or 230kv sub-station for power production – less than 2 km; Proximity to sanitary sewer line – less than 3 miles; Wastewater treatment plant –less than 3 miles etc.
Step 3: Suitability Analysis (weightage)
Step 4: Comparative Assessment of Sites
Step 5: Site selection
Site Selection Approach: Example of Renewable Power Generation and Resources
Recovery Facility, Puerto Rico
18
Page 352/11/2014
Source: Presentation on “SITING OF INDUSTRIES IN A MULTI-HAZARD ENVIRONMENT- Risk Mapping and Knowledge
Management’”, Dr. Anil K. Gupta, Associate Professor, Sreeja S. Nair, Assistant Professor, NIDM, New Delhi
Site Selection Approach: Methodology from NIDM, New Delhi
Page 36
Hazard IdentificationAll hazards have to be identified comprehensively and systematically ...
• eg. „classical“ EHS-hazards, loss of production, ... Operation
hazards
Network
hazards
Environmental
hazards
• eg. failure of utilities, supplies, transportation ...
• eg. natural hazards, adjacent plants and traffic ways, ...
• eg. densely populated areas/buildings, natural reserves, ...Environmental
vulnerability
• eg. plant vulnerability, neighbourhood/environment sensitivity, company image, ...
Terrorist threats
36Source: Presentation on “European Best Practice for industrial Disaster Risk Management (iDRM)”, Dr. Christian
Jochum, InWEnt Senior Advisor (www.inwent.org), Director of Centre, European Process Safety Centre ,
Chairman, German Commission on Process Safety
19
Page 37
DGNB Germany Criteria for Industrial Locations
11/02/2014
» Life Cycle Assessment (resource consumption and emissions)
» Water and Soil Protection
» Changing Urban Microclimate
» Biodiversity
» Environmental Risks [Indicators: earthquake; avalanches; storm; flood;
landslide, soil subsidence]
» Land Use [Indicators: proportion of fallow land; area integration; area
pollution]
» Total Primary Energy Demand
» Resource-efficient infrastructure
» Drinking Water Demand and Waste Water Volume
Page 38
Safety distances –
mandated in line with
Germany’s major
accidents law under
Federal Pollution
Control Acts
(based on long term
operating experience
and analysis of major
accidents)
www.kas-bmu.de
Safety DistancesCommission on Process Safety (German Federal Ministry for Environment
- BMU)
20
Page 3911/02/2014
1. Undertake district-wise risk assessments and identify areas to
be avoided for MAH Units.
2. Develop siting criteria for MAH Industries and other
installations.
3. Notify Safety Distances.
4. Identify “Major Hazard Vulnerable Areas” and direct state
agencies to prepare Land Use Plans (development
plans/regional plans/master plans).
5. Specify “disaster management” requirements for integration
into Industrial Parks.
Recommendations:
Page 4011/02/2014
Recommendations:
5. Develop Guidelines for integration of “disaster management”
aspects into Industrial Park Layout/Site Master Planning.
6. Develop Criteria on “disaster management” for integrating into
Industrial Park rating systems.
7. Apply for all new industrial areas and investment regions,
8. Retrofit existing/old industrial areas.
9. Undertake capacity building (organisational and individual) on
planning of industrial parks.
21
Page 41
Thank You
11/02/2014
Raghu Babu Nukala
Indo German Environment Partnership (IGEP) Programme
Senior Technical Advisor & Programme Coordinator
Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH
3rd Floor, B5/2 Safdarjung Enclave
New Delhi 110 029T +91 11 49495353, Ext: 2358
F +91 11 49495391
I: www.giz.de; www.ecoindustrialparks.net
Page 4211/02/2014
Ongoing Site Master Planning Activities with GIZ Support
Women entrepreneurs
industrial park (AP)
APSEZ (AP)
Green Industrial park AP)
Multi-product
SEZ (AP)