law: right to information act, 2005

45
Janmey Patel (202) Nikhil Arora (206) Shashank Mohore (228) Aniket Gupta (229) Parandeep Singh Chawla (231)

Upload: parandeep-chawla

Post on 08-May-2015

1.544 views

Category:

Business


6 download

DESCRIPTION

Right to Information Act, 2005

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Law: Right to Information Act, 2005

Janmey Patel (202)Nikhil Arora (206)Shashank Mohore (228)Aniket Gupta (229)Parandeep Singh Chawla (231)

Page 2: Law: Right to Information Act, 2005
Page 3: Law: Right to Information Act, 2005

The Real ‘Swaraj’ will come not by the acquisition of authority by a few but by the acquisition of capacity by all to resist authority when abused.

–Mahatma Gandhi

Page 4: Law: Right to Information Act, 2005

"I believe that the passage of this Bill will see the dawn of a new era in our processes of governance, an era of performance and efficiency, an era which will ensure that benefits of growth flow to all sections of our people, an era which will eliminate the scourge of corruption, an era which will bring the common man's concern to the heart of all processes of governance, an era which will truly fulfill the hopes of the founding fathers of our Republic”◦ Speech in Parliament on May 11, 2005- Dr.

Manmohan Singh Prime Minister of India

Page 5: Law: Right to Information Act, 2005

What is Right to Information?What is Right to Information?

• Asking for and being given information as a matter of right is called “Right to InformationRight to Information”

• The Right to Information is a fundamental right under the Constitution of IndiaConstitution of India

• Information is necessary to form and express opinions, dissent or support on any matter. It is therefore a part of Article 19 (1)(a)Article 19 (1)(a)

• Information is necessary for protection of the right to life and liberty. It is therefore a part of Article 21Article 21

Page 6: Law: Right to Information Act, 2005

The Indian Bureaucracy has inherited administrative culture of secrecy as a colonial and feudal legacy. Secrecy has been the most common culture of bureaucratic culture.

• The official Secrets Act, 1923• Section 123 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872,

provides that the head of the department can refuse to part with an information.

• Rule 11 of the Central Services(Conduct) Rules, 1964 prohibits a government servant to part with any official document.

• Rule 9 of the All India Services(Conduct) Rules, 1968 prohibits any communication of Information

Page 7: Law: Right to Information Act, 2005

Global Scenario Sweden –1776 UN Assembly Resolution, 1948

People’s right to have access to official information ––Freedom of Information as Fundamental Human Right

USA Act, 1966 -amended after ‘Watergate’ 56 Countries have already enacted the

Right to Information (North America, Most of Europe, Australia,

Columbia, Peru, Japan)

Page 8: Law: Right to Information Act, 2005

Initiative of Mazdoor Kisan Shakti Sangthan

• Assertion of RTI by asking for copies of bills, vouchers and names persons shown in the muster rolls.

• Purpose of preventing misappropriation of funds.

• MKSS succeeded in getting photocopies of relevant documents revealing misappropriation of funds.

• MKSS organized Jan Sunwai, first ever in history of Rajasthan, during 1994-95.

• Similar exercise by Lok Satta, an NGO in Andhra Pradesh.

• DoPT set a Working Group on RTI and Promotion of Open and Transparent Govt. in Jan, 1997 under Shri H. D. Shourie.

• Submitted draft bill of Freedom of Information in May, 1997.

• Government of India enacted Freedom of Information Bill, 2000.

• Freedom of Information Act passed in 2002.

• Freedom of Information Act repealed in 2005 and substituted by RTI Act, 2005.

Page 9: Law: Right to Information Act, 2005

Union of India v. Association for Democratic Reforms (2002) 5 SCC 294- “the court recognized the citizen’s fundamental

right to information and even went to the extend saying that such a right should be recognized and fully effectuated”

Page 10: Law: Right to Information Act, 2005

Onkar Lal Bajaj v. Union of India(2003) 2 SCC 673- “ Articles 21 & 14-right to information-allotment of

retail outlets, distributorships and dealerships of petroleum products-political patronage for allotment was alleged by the press-Under such circumstances, the public in general has a right to know under what basis their elected representatives got such allotments.”

Page 11: Law: Right to Information Act, 2005

Provides a legal framework of citizens’ democratic right to access to information under the control of public authorities;

To promote transparency and accountability in the functioning of every public authority

Page 12: Law: Right to Information Act, 2005

Long Title of the Act

An Act to provide for setting out the practical

regime of right to information for citizens to secure access to information under the control of public authorities, in order to promote transparency and accountability in the working of every public authority, the constitution of a Central Information Commission and State Information Commissions and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto.

Page 13: Law: Right to Information Act, 2005

Preamble to the Act

What does it say ?

● Informed citizenry and transparency of information are vital to the functioning of our democratic republic

● to contain corruption● to hold Government and their

instrumentalities accountable to the governed.

Page 14: Law: Right to Information Act, 2005

Covers all of India except Jammu and Covers all of India except Jammu and KashmirKashmir..

Covers central, state and local governments, andall bodies owned, controlled or substantially financed;non-government organisation substantially financed,

directly or indirectly by funds provided by the appropriate Government (2(h))

Covers executive, judiciary and legislature (2(e) Includes information relating to private body

which can be accessed by under any other law for the time being in force (2(f))

Page 15: Law: Right to Information Act, 2005

Because it helps to:

◦ Promote openness, transparency and accountability in the working of every public authority.

◦ Reduce Corruption ◦ Prevent administrative arbitrariness◦ Bride the gap between providers and recipient of

public services◦ Make citizens part of decision making◦ Make administrative responsive◦ Strengthen the foundations of democracy

Page 16: Law: Right to Information Act, 2005

Definition of Right to Information [Section 2(j)]

Right to information accessible under the RTI Act which is held by or under the control of any public authority and includes the right to -

i) Inspection of work, documents, records

ii) Taking notes, extracts or certified copies of documents of records;

iii) Taking certified samples of material;

iv) Obtaining information in the form of diskettes, floppies, tapes, video cassettes or in any other electronic mode or through printouts where such information is stored in a computer or in any other device.

Page 17: Law: Right to Information Act, 2005

Definition of Information [Section 2 (f)]Any material in any form, including

-• Records,• Documents,• Memos,• E-mails,• Opinions,• Advices,• Press Releases,• Circulars,• Orders,• Logbooks,• Contracts,• Reports,• Papers,• Samples,• Models,• Data material held in any electronic form and • Information relating to any private body which can be accessed by a public authority under any other law for the time being in force.

Page 18: Law: Right to Information Act, 2005

“Public Authority” means any authority or body or institution established or constituted

By or under the constitution;By any other law made by Parliament;By any other law made by State Legislature;By notification issued or order made by the appropriate Government and includes any

i) body owned, controlled or substantially financed, ii) non - Government organization substantially

financed directly or indirectly by funds provided by the appropriate Government;

Page 19: Law: Right to Information Act, 2005

Application Process

Apply in person or electronically

(Reasons for seeking information shall not be asked)

Time limit for giving information

If information concerns life and liberty of a person

If information is given by third party then invite objections if any

No action on application for 30 days

request in English or local official language

deemed refusal

add 10 extra days

must be given within 48 hrs

30 days

[Sec. 6 & 7]

Page 20: Law: Right to Information Act, 2005

DISPOSAL OF REQUESTS: TIME-FRAME

In 30 days if direct to PIOIn 35 days if through APIOIn 48 hours if life & liberty at stakeIf redirected, in 5 daysIf not given in time, deemed refusedIf further fees required, period between dispatch of

request and deposit of fees will not count

Page 21: Law: Right to Information Act, 2005

PIO provides information to anyone requesting for it

APIO receives applications and forwards them to PIO

Page 22: Law: Right to Information Act, 2005

Functions of PIO

Deal with requests for information

Offer reasonable assistance to applicant

Provide access-enabling assistance to sensorily disabled

Seek assistance from any other officer as considered necessary

For the purpose of contravention of this act, such other officer will be treated as PIO.

Page 23: Law: Right to Information Act, 2005

REQUESTS FOR INFORMATION

Will be made to PIOTo be in writing/ electronic means (if it can’t be in

writing, PIO will assist to reduce oral request to writing)

In Hindi, English, Official language of the areaAccompanied by prescribed feeNo reason required No personal details required except for contactingTo be transferred to another public authority if

pertains to them (in 5 days) applicant to be informed

Page 24: Law: Right to Information Act, 2005

Fees payable

Application fees prescribed by appropriate Govt. (Rs.50/-)

Cost of giving information may be charged on the requestor

Requestor may seek review of the fees from the Appellate Authority if it is unreasonable

If information is not given within time limit it must be given free of cost

(Details of fees and how the figure was arrived at must be given in writing)

Time between date of dispatch of intimation about fees and actual payment excluded while calculating 30 day time limit

[Sec. 6, 7]

Rs. 2/- per page; Rs. 50/- per floppy, others and samples - actual

cost; inspection – 1st hour free, Rs. 5/ - every subsequent 15min

Must be reasonable. No fees for Below Poverty Line applicant

Page 25: Law: Right to Information Act, 2005

(a) National security(b) Contempt of court(c) Parliamentary privilege(d) Trade secrecy(e) Fiduciary relationship(f) Foreign government(g) Safety of informer in law enforcement(h) Investigation(i) Cabinet papers(j) Privacy(K) Copyright - disclosure which would involve an infringement

of copyright subsisting in a person other than the State may be rejected. [Section 9]

Page 26: Law: Right to Information Act, 2005

Who is not covered? [Sec. 24(1) and Schedule 2]

• IB & RAW

• Directorate of Revenue Intelligence

• Central Economic Intelligence Bureau

• Directorate of Enforcement

• Narcotics Control Bureau

• Aviation Research Centre

• Special Frontier Force

• CRPF, ITBP, CISF, NSG• Special Service Bureau

• Assam Rifles

• Special Branch (CID) Andaman and Nicobar

• Crime Branch (CID) Dadra and Nagar Haveli• Special Branch Lakshadweep Police

Matters relating to corruption and human rights violations covered by law must be given

Information can be given only if concerned IC approves Time limit – 45 days

and any other intelligence or security organisation established by State govts.

Page 27: Law: Right to Information Act, 2005

Central Information Commission 1 Chief Information Commissioner (5 yr term) and max. 1 Chief Information Commissioner (5 yr term) and max.

10 10 InformationInformation Commissioners (ICs) ( one 5 yr term) Commissioners (ICs) ( one 5 yr term)

Chief Information Commissioner to be in Delhi but ICs Chief Information Commissioner to be in Delhi but ICs could be based in other partscould be based in other parts

Commission will be independent of Govt. controlCommission will be independent of Govt. control

CIC and ICs to be appointed by President with immediate CIC and ICs to be appointed by President with immediate effecteffect

Names recommended by committee - PM (Chair), Leader Names recommended by committee - PM (Chair), Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha and 1 Cabinet Minister of Opposition in the Lok Sabha and 1 Cabinet Minister nominated by PMnominated by PM

Central Information Central Information CommissionCommission to be based in Delhi to be based in Delhi

Page 28: Law: Right to Information Act, 2005

State Information Commission

1 State Chief Information Commissioner (5 yr term) and max. 10 State Information Commissioners (SICs) (one 5 yr term)

Commission will be independent of State Govt. control

SCIC and SICs to be appointed by Governor with SCIC and SICs to be appointed by Governor with immediate effectimmediate effect

Names recommended by committee - CM (Chair), Leader of Opposition in the Vidhan Sabha and 1 Cabinet Minister nominated by CM

State Information Commission could be in any part of the State – to be decided by the States

Similar powers and functions as Central Information Commission

Page 29: Law: Right to Information Act, 2005

Appellate Authority (AA)Appellate Authority (AA)

First AppealFirst Appeal(Internal)(Internal)

The officer senior in rank to the PIO The officer senior in rank to the PIO in the concerned public authorityin the concerned public authority

(Within 30 days from the date of refusal letter but delay may be condoned if sufficient cause is shown)

[Sec. 12-19][Sec. 12-19]

Time limit = 30 daysTime limit = 30 days

Page 30: Law: Right to Information Act, 2005

Appellate Authority (AA)Appellate Authority (AA)

Second appealSecond appeal (External)(External)

to Central/State Information Commissionto Central/State Information Commission

(within 90 days from the date of decision of first AA but delay may be condoned if sufficient cause is shown)

No time limit for CIC/SIC to decide on appealsNo time limit for CIC/SIC to decide on appeals

Burden of proof lies on PIO Burden of proof lies on PIO for justifying denial of for justifying denial of informationinformation

Appeal against IC’s decision can be filed in High Appeal against IC’s decision can be filed in High Courts/Supreme Court, not lower courtsCourts/Supreme Court, not lower courts

Decision of CIC/SIC Decision of CIC/SIC is bindingis binding

[Sec. 12-19][Sec. 12-19]

Page 31: Law: Right to Information Act, 2005

Penalty Provisions

IC can penalise PIO Rs. 250/- per day up to a maximum of Rs. 25,000/- for -

• Refusal to receive application

[Sec. 20-21]

• Not furnishing information within time limit

• Malafidely denying information

• Knowingly giving incorrect, incomplete, misleading information

• Destroying information which was the subject of request

• Obstructing furnishing of information in any manner

Without reasonable

cause

For persistent violation of the law IC can recommend disciplinary action

Page 32: Law: Right to Information Act, 2005

1 Greater Transparency: With a view to ensuring maximum disclosure of information regarding government rules, regulations and decisions, every public authority is mandated to maintain all its records. This has increased the interaction between the public authorities and the society.

32

Page 33: Law: Right to Information Act, 2005

2. Citizen-Centric Approach to Development:

Now Govt. has shifted to citizen centric approach of development. Now the Government is aware of this fact that the citizens can ask for any type of information and now the approach is concerned with the development of the country.

33

Page 34: Law: Right to Information Act, 2005

3. Democratization of information and knowledge:

Information and knowledge regarding the activities of the government is easily available now. The Govt. is easily assessable.

34

Page 35: Law: Right to Information Act, 2005

4. Reduction in Corruption: Lack of transparency and accountability encourage the government officials

to indulge in corrupt practices, which result in lower investments due to mis-use or diversion of funds for private purposes. But RTI Act has reduced corruption to a great deal because Govt. is aware of the fact that now it can be asked for any type of information so it needs to be cautious.

35

Page 36: Law: Right to Information Act, 2005

5. Greater Accountability: It means that the Govt. is required or expected to

justify actions or decisions which it is taking. If anyone isn’t getting the benefits which come under the Govt. policies then he/she can make use of RTI Act.

36

Page 37: Law: Right to Information Act, 2005

CASES/LIVE LIVE EXAMPLES……EXAMPLES……

37

Page 38: Law: Right to Information Act, 2005
Page 39: Law: Right to Information Act, 2005

1. In Ghara Katara village of Shankar Garh block in Allahabad, daily wagers had a tough time arranging a proper meal as they were not receiving rations on their cards. On December 19, 2006, some 21 villagers prepared RTI applications and questioned the administration. The very next day all the ration card holders got their rations.

Page 40: Law: Right to Information Act, 2005

2.The Act is influencing people to come forward and question the progress on various welfare schemes, creating a positive change in the most backward areas like Eastern UP, Bihar, Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh , Karnataka , Assam and in Maharashtra. For e.g. Laborer employment programs initiated in UP and Bihar.

Page 41: Law: Right to Information Act, 2005

3.Even the most backward sections of rural societies are seeking information related to Prime Minister's Employment Scheme, Indira Awaas Yojna, ration card, midday meal, uniform distribution in the schools and the conditions of village roads.

Page 42: Law: Right to Information Act, 2005

Adarsh Society Scam Public Distribution Scam in Assam Appropriation of Relief Funds IIM’s Admission Criteria

Page 43: Law: Right to Information Act, 2005

The largest democratic nation, India has survived all vicissitudes, turbulences of all kinds over the last half century and more.

In that context, the bringing into being of the RTI has been an important milestone. The Act that came into being last year assures every citizen the right to know what the citizen should, and throws open the system of governance to total transparency and therefore inescapable accountability.

Dr. APJ Abdul Kalam

Inaugural Address at the National Convention on RTI

13-10-2006: New Delhi

Page 44: Law: Right to Information Act, 2005

http://rti.gov.in/ www.icar.org.in http://blogs.wsj.com/indiarealtime/2011/10/14/a-lo

ok-at-some-rti-success-stories/

Page 45: Law: Right to Information Act, 2005