lattice calculation of the gluino condensate in n=1 super yang-mills theory with overlap fermions
DESCRIPTION
Lattice calculation of the gluino condensate in N=1 super Yang-Mills theory with overlap fermions. Jun Nishimura (KEK, SOKENDAI) JLQCD Collaboration: with Sang-Woo Kim, Hidenori Fukaya, Shoji Hashimoto, Hideo Matsufuru, Tetsuya Onogi. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Lattice calculation of the gluino condensate in N=1 super Yang-Mills theory with overlap fermions
Jun Nishimura (KEK, SOKENDAI)
JLQCD Collaboration:with Sang-Woo Kim, Hidenori Fukaya, Shoji Hashimoto, Hideo Matsufuru, Tetsuya OnogiRef.) arXiv:1111.2180 [hep-lat] talk given by S.-W.Kim at LAT2011
Plan of the talk
1. Introduction2. N=1 super Yang-Mills theory3. Results4. Summary
Motivation for N=1 SUSY
•Low energy effective theories of superstring theory that are phenomenologically viable
•A natural solution to hierarchy problem is
available if SUSY breaking occurs at O(TeV)
•Natural candidates for the dark matter,Better unification of 3 forces at the GUT scale,…
(model dependent, though)
supersymmetric QCD (or SQCD)
gluon gluino (adjoint Majorana fermion)
quark squark (fundamental, scalar boson)
QCD
gluon (adjoint , vector boson)
quark (fundamental, Dirac fermion)
N=1 SUSY
superpartners
SUSY algebra includes translational symmetry
broken by the lattice regularization
SUSY on the lattice
Restore SUSY in the continuum limit by fine-tuning parameters in the lattice action
(# of param. to be fine-tuned) = (# of SUSY breaking relevant ops.)
And so is SUSY !
Developments in “lattice SUSY”
lattice actions with various symmetries, which prohibit SUSY breaking relevant ops. e.g.) preserving 1 supercharge using topological twist # of parameters to be fine-tuned can be reduced
non-lattice simulations of SYM with 16 supercharges 1d gauge theory (gauge-fixed, momentum space sim.) extension to higher dimensions using the idea of large N reduction
In this work, we preserve chiral symmetryby using overlap fermion
no fine-tuning
4d N=1 super Yang-Mills theory
SUSY tr.
•Witten index is nonzero
• (anomalous)
•Gluino condensate
Known facts about 4d N=1 SYM
SSB of
SUSY is NOT spontaneously broken
Rem.) no Nambu-Goldstone bosons !
may trigger SSB of SUSY in extended models with matters.
4d N=1 SYM on the lattice•SUSY can be restored in the continuum limit by fine-tuning parameters in the lattice action # of param. to be fine-tuned = # of SUSY breaking relevant
operators
• In the case of 4d N=1 SYM, the only SUSY breaking relevant operator is the gluino mass term, which can be
prohibited by imposing chiral symmetry.
(Curci-Veneziano ’87)perturbative studies with Wilson fermions
Previous studies
The crucial problem : chiral extrapolation difficult to do reliably
We use the overlap fermion for gluino, for the first time !
How to calculate gluino condensate
•The naïve defintion
•Following previous works in QCD, we use Banks-Casher relation (’80)
suffers from UV divergence, which should be subtracted appropriately
free from UV divergence
(DeGrand-Schaefer ’05, Fukaya et al. (JLQCD) ’07)
Numerical setup• Iwasaki gauge action with SU(2) gauge group• •Restricted to zero topological charge sector
•28 low-modes of Dirac op. obtained by Lanczos method•BlueGene/L at KEK and SR16000 at YITP
Sommer scale
Low-lying spectrum of Dirac op.
non-zerogluino condensatesuggested
m = 0:2
(there are finite V effects, though)
A trick to get rid of finite V effects
•Chiral Random Matrix Theory (Verbaarschot ’94)
Universal description ofthe low-lying eigenvalue distribution of the Dirac op.at finite V and m
corresponding to the symmetry of Dirac op. for adjoint fermions
chGSE (chiral Gaussian Symplectic Ensemble)
Lowest eigenvalue distribution in RMT
written in terms of dimensionless parameters
(Damgaard-Nishigaki ’01)
eigenvalue
Lowest eigenvalue distribution
Results for gluino condensate
Sommer scale
•Lattice calculation of the gluino condensate
overlap fermion killed the problems of chiral extrapolation Banks-Casher rel. killed the UV div. RMT-based analysis killed finite V effects
Summary
•Comparison with previous DWF study (Giedt ’09)