last lecture_china’s miraculous growth_winter2009

Upload: kaahl

Post on 08-Apr-2018

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/6/2019 Last Lecture_Chinas miraculous growth_winter2009

    1/16

    Chinas miraculous growth:

    or is it?

    Last Lecturehuhu!

    Part I

  • 8/6/2019 Last Lecture_Chinas miraculous growth_winter2009

    2/16

    Why unexpected?

    China exhibits a remarkable combinationof high-speed growth and deeply flawedinstitutions (Loren Brandt and TomRawski)

  • 8/6/2019 Last Lecture_Chinas miraculous growth_winter2009

    3/16

    Chinas per capita GDP (at PPP)

    in the last one thousand years

    0

    100

    0

    2000

    3

    000

    4000

    1850 19781000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000

  • 8/6/2019 Last Lecture_Chinas miraculous growth_winter2009

    4/16

    The worlds average per capita

    GDP (at PPP)

    0

    2000

    40

    00

    6000

    1850 1978

    1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000

    China World

  • 8/6/2019 Last Lecture_Chinas miraculous growth_winter2009

    5/16

    100

    200

    300

    400

    500

    1978 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000year

    China (1978-2001, +1.5% each year)

    South Korea (1978-2001)

    China (1978-2001)

    Taiwan, China (1978-2001)

    Japan (1978-2001)

    Chinas growth seems to be thefastest: GDP per head at PPP, semi-

    log

    Source: Angus Maddison (2003)

  • 8/6/2019 Last Lecture_Chinas miraculous growth_winter2009

    6/16

    Is Chinas growth unusual Realigning the starting points

    Japan: 1950

    Taiwan, China: 1958

    South Korea: 1962

    China: 1978

  • 8/6/2019 Last Lecture_Chinas miraculous growth_winter2009

    7/16

    China is similar to East Asianeconomies: GDP per head at PPP,

    semi-log

    100

    200

    300

    400

    500

    600

    800

    1000

    1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29year

    Japan (1950-1973)

    Taiwan, China (1958-1987)

    South Korea (1962-1990)

    China (1978-2001)

    China (1978-2001, +1.5% each year)

    Source: Angus Maddison (2003)

  • 8/6/2019 Last Lecture_Chinas miraculous growth_winter2009

    8/16

    The rule of law index

    Note: From 0 to 100, the higher the score, the better the rule of law.Source: Kaufmann, Kraay and Mastruzzi (2005), Governance Matters IV: Governance Indicators for 1996-2004.

    Country/Region 2004 2002 2000 1998 1996

    Singapore 95.7 92.3 98.9 99.5 99.4

    Hong Kong 90.3 84.7 90.4 90.8 90.4

    Japan 89.9 88.3 90.9 90.3 88.0

    Hungary 78.7 77.6 78.6 76.2 75.3

    South Korea 68.6 76.5 73.8 76.8 81.9

    Malaysia 64.7 67.9 71.1 76.8 82.5

    Turkey 54.6 53.1 59.9 65.9 58.4

    Thailand 51.7 60.2 69.0 69.2 71.1

    India 50.7 55.6 62.0 67.0 56.6

    Romania 48.3 52.0 51.9 49.7 44.0

    Brazil 46.9 45.9 53.5 56.8 46.4

    Mexico 45.9 47.4 46.0 40.0 54.2

    China 40.6 48.5 48.7 52.4 37.3

    Peru 31.9 36.7 38.5 37.3 40.4

    Russia 29.5 21.4 18.7 22.7 19.9

    Ukraine 23.2 21.4 26.2 23.2 28.3

  • 8/6/2019 Last Lecture_Chinas miraculous growth_winter2009

    9/16

    The regulatory quality indexCountry/Region 2004 2002 2000 1998 1996

    Hong Kong 99.5 89.3 98.4 98.4 98.9

    Singapore 99.0 99.0 100.0 100.0 99.4

    Hungary 86.7 84.2 88.2 88.0 74.6Japan 83.7 78.1 81.8 69.0 82.3

    South Korea 71.9 75.5 69.5 58.2 78.5

    Mexico 68.0 66.8 76.5 75.5 74.0

    Malaysia 64.5 69.4 64.2 70.1 82.9

    Brazil 58.1 63.3 64.7 57.1 60.2

    Peru 57.1 62.2 73.3 81.5 76.2

    Thailand 51.2 64.8 77.5 56.0 69.6

    Romania 49.8 55.1 35.8 58.2 30.4

    Turkey 48.8 55.6 55.1 80.4 71.3

    China 35.0 37.8 36.9 42.9 47.0

    Ukraine 33.5 27.0 11.2 17.9 23.8

    Russia 30.5 43.4 5.3 31.5 31.5

    India 26.6 43.4 38.5 41.8 44.2

    Note: From 0 to 100, the higher the score, the better the regulatory quality.Source: Kaufmann , Kraay and Mastruzzi (2005), Governance Matters IV: Governance Indicators for 1996-2004.

  • 8/6/2019 Last Lecture_Chinas miraculous growth_winter2009

    10/16

    Corruption perception index

    Country/Region 2004 Rank 2004 Score

    Finland 1 9.7

    Singapore 5 9.3

    Hong Kong 16 8.0

    United States 17 7.5Mexico 64 3.6

    Thailand 64 3.6

    Peru 67 3.5

    China 71 3.4

    Turkey 77 3.2Romania 87 2.9

    Russia 90 2.8

    India 90 2.8

    Ukraine 122 2.2

    Source: Transparency International.

  • 8/6/2019 Last Lecture_Chinas miraculous growth_winter2009

    11/16

  • 8/6/2019 Last Lecture_Chinas miraculous growth_winter2009

    12/16

    Are Chinas institutions deeplyflawed

    But the measured quality of its institutionscorresponds to its level of development(per capita GDP)

  • 8/6/2019 Last Lecture_Chinas miraculous growth_winter2009

    13/16

    39676

    29251

    25047

    20499

    13296

    9902 8833 8195

    5896 3609 31391670 1140

    0

    1 0

    , 0 0 0

    2 0

    , 0 0 0 3 0

    , 0 0 0

    4 0

    , 0 0 0

    U . S .

    J a p a n

    S p a

    i n

    K o r e a

    A r g e n

    t i n a

    R u s s

    i a n

    W o r l

    d

    B r a z

    i l

    C h i n

    a

    I n d

    o n e s

    i a

    I n d i a

    B a n g

    l a d

    es

    h

    K e n y a

    Source: UN Human Development Report 2006.

    China is still below the worldsaverage in per capita GDP at PPP

    (US$, 2004)

  • 8/6/2019 Last Lecture_Chinas miraculous growth_winter2009

    14/16

  • 8/6/2019 Last Lecture_Chinas miraculous growth_winter2009

    15/16

    Corruption perception and per capitaGDP

    0

    .5

    1

    1

    .5

    2

    2.5

    lnCPIby

    Transparency

    Interna

    tiona

    l

    1/64 1/32 1/16 1/8 1/4 1/2 1

    GDP per capita at international price (U.S.=1) by PWT (2000)

    ln(CPI) Fitted values

    CHN

  • 8/6/2019 Last Lecture_Chinas miraculous growth_winter2009

    16/16

    Take away message

    Chinas growth IS miraculous But, it is just one of many East Asian miracles

    Biggest part of the miracle is that it matters

    to the Rest of the World because China is so big

    it is still Communist/Totalitarian

    It is China reasserting itself

    It is happening with flawed institutions But, all countries at Chinas levels of

    development have flawed institutions [sothat is not anything really special]