laser pulse width - california institute of technologyveverka/files/report_07-04-04.pdf · — adi...
TRANSCRIPT
Laser Pulse WidthLaser Pulse Width
Progress Report
J. VeverkaCaltech CMS Group Meeting
April 4, 2007
2
APD/PNAPD/PN--WidthWidth Linear FitLinear Fitss
• Linear fit of the APD/PN-width dependence for each channel of each SM
• Normalize APD/PN by the fit value at width = 30 ns
• Distributions and crystal maps for the slope, intercept, chi2, etc. of the linear fits for the normalizedAPD/PN values
error bars blown up by a factor of 10
normalization value
Example
3
Slope ValuesSlope Values
• Fit results for all channels of SM 4, 13, 17, 19, 20 and 22 (6 x 1700 = 10200 channels).
• The top plot shows the distribution of the linear-fit slopes.
• The bottom plot shows what fraction of crystals has a slope that fits in a given range around the mean value.
• Note that some 75% of the 10200 channels have a slope in the range (-2.372 +- 0.5) ‰/ns
4
Slope ValuesSlope Values
• Fit results for all channels of SM 4, 13, 17, 19, 20 and 22 (6 x 1700 = 10200 channels).
• The top plot shows the distribution of the linear-fit slopes.
• The bottom plot shows what fraction of crystals has a slope that fits in a given range around the mean value.
• Note that some 75% of the 10200 channels have a slope in the range (-2.372 +- 0.5) ‰/ns
75%
5
LM / TT FeaturesLM / TT FeaturesSM04
SM17
6
LM / TT FeaturesLM / TT FeaturesSM04
SM17
Crystal 353 Crystal 935
Crystal 558 Crystal 758
7
LM/TT FeaturesLM/TT Features
• Sometimes bad data, e.g. top plot
• Sometimes inherent property of the data, e.g. bottom plot
Crystal 558
Crystal 758
8
DQMDQM
APD/PN
9
APD/PN StabilityAPD/PN Stability
Plot sigmaof the fit
APD/PN
10
SM17SM17
11
SM17SM17
12
Run 20755Run 20755
13
Run 20755Run 20755
Disturbing tail
14
Run 20755Run 20755
Crystal 81
15
Run 20755Run 20755
Crystal 82
16
Run 2075Run 207566
Crystals 81, 82
17
APD/PN, SM17APD/PN, SM17Crystal 81 Crystal 82
Run
20755
Run
20756
18
PlanPlan
• Plot APD/PN Gaussian fit chi2’s • Plot crystal misfits run by run • Plot crystal pulls run by run• Devise DQM cuts
Backup SlidesBackup Slides
ReviewReview
Laser Monitoring Issues
21
Laser Monitoring Laser Monitoring
• Purpose: measure the ECAL crystal transparency change due to irradiation during the LHC running
• Goal: ~1 ‰ APD/PN stability• Need: understand systematic correlation between
APD/PN laser pulse– Width– Timing– Amplitude
• Here: concentrate on the width issues
22
APD/PNAPD/PN--Width DependenceWidth Dependence
• Simulated as a convolution of the laser pulse shape and electronics response:“The dependence observed in data can be reproduced based on the properties of the pulses alone.”
— Adi Bornheim, TB meeting, 20 Sep 2005“Slope (normalized APD/PN vs. width) : 2 ‰/ns”
— Adi Bornheim, TB meeting, 3 Nov 2005• Measured for a few channels of the 2004 SM10 data to be
linear with a slope of around 2.5 ‰/ns. For details, see talk by Adi Bornheim, TB meeting, 3 Nov 2005.
• Expected long-term width stability ~1-2 ns• Implication: The effect is larger than required precision, a
correction is needed. • Here: Measure the effect for the 2006 TB data on a larger
scale
Review: WidthReview: Width
Review of APD/PN and Laser Pulse Width Correlation
24
Pulse Shape ConvolutionPulse Shape Convolution
Time [ns]20 40 60 80 100 120 140
Pu
lse H
eig
ht
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
APD Pulses - Simulated
Laser Pulse Width 20 ns
Laser Pulse Width 25 ns
Laser Pulse Width 30 ns
Laser Pulse Width 35 ns
Laser Pulse Width 40 ns
Time [ns]400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200
PN
Pu
lse H
eig
ht
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
0.4
Time [ns]780 785 790 795 800 805 810 815 820
PN
Pu
lse
He
igh
t
0.4079
0.40795
0.408
0.40805
0.4081
Time [ns]20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180
AP
D P
uls
e H
eig
ht
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
Laser Shape
Convoluted Shapes
Reminder :Pulse shape is a convolution of the electronic shape and the ‘line shape’ of the light. In case of a laser pulse, essentially a gaussianwith FWHM of 20 – 40 ns.Details : See talk on 20 Sep. 2005.
Remaining issue :The pulse width dependency extract from simulated shapes depends strongly on the a priori unknown electronic shape. This makes it difficult to predict the actual pulse width dependency.Solution :Tune the convoluted shape such that it matches the shape in data.
25
Pulse Width Correction on SM10Pulse Width Correction on SM10 in in 20042004
Uncorrected
Corrected
ECAL APD/PN, Single Channel Monitoring History
Laser Pulse Height
Laser Pulse Width
450 Hours
Fast Monitor Data
Data analysed : Part of Period 1 (not all the data was re-reprocessed to fix PN data) and Period 3. Period 2 is problematic -and thus not used.
Pulse width correction :APD/PN_cor = APD/PN+c·PW_Laser
26
Monitoring Stability Monitoring Stability vsvs Pulse Width Pulse Width CorrectionCorrection
Mon
itorin
g St
abili
ty [‰
]
Slope [1/ns]
With a linear correction we can vary the slope to study the sensitivity :
From SM10 data it appears that we don’t have to know the slope with great precision.
Review: AmplitudeReview: Amplitude
APD/PN and Laser Pulse Amplitude Correlation
28
APD [ADC Counts] APD [ADC Counts] vsvs APD/PN for SM22APD/PN for SM22
• For the SM22 PW scan, the intensity changes between 2000 and 4000 ADC counts. For that the APD/PN changes ~3.0 %
• From the linearity scan with the laser above we see that the nonlinearity as a function of the pulse intensity is of the order of ~0.1 %.
PrePreview: Timingview: Timing
APD/PN and Laser Pulse Timing Correlation
30
Amplitude, Timing and Width vs Pump Current
• At 25 A : -1.7 ns/A width / -46 ns/A timing
• At 22 A : ~ -4 ns/A width / -62.5 ns/A timing
• The timing changes ’10 times as fast’ as the width – in units of ns.
• The ageing should follow the same curves with respect to each other, otherwise the feedback does not work.
31
Timing and Width Timing and Width vsvs TimeTime
Shown is the drift of the pulse width (left) and the pulse timing (right) for the period corresponding to SM22 on the TB. While the timing drifts by about 2 ns between 9900 h and 10000 h the width drifts about 1.5 ns. That is clearly in contradiction to the behaviour on the previous slide.
New ResultsNew Results
APD/PN and Laser Pulse Width Correlation Measurements
33
Used DataUsed Data
• APD/PN data– Pulse width scans for 7 SMs: 2, 4, 13, 17, 19, 20, 22
(1700 channels each)– Total of ~90 useful laser runs (600 events each)– Standard online laser code used for reconstruction– Gaussian fit for each channel of each run:
• APD/PN value = mean of the fit• APD/PN value error = (sigma of the fit) / √600
• Laser pulse width data– Fast Monitor in the laser barracks used – All 2006 laser runs reconstructed and matched – Gaussian fit for each run:
• Width value and its error = same as for the APD/PN
34
Slope Distribution Example Slope Distribution Example -- SM17SM17
Max. single-value correction error ~ (0.18 ‰/ns)×(2 ns) = 0.36 ‰ < 1 ‰
For more plots like this one, see http://ultralight.caltech.edu/hepwiki/PulseWidthSystematics
Sigma / |Mean| = 6.9(1)%
35
Slope Crystal Map Example Slope Crystal Map Example -- SM17SM17
• Noticeable LM structures– Their scale is small compared to the slope values– They are a general feature of the APD/PN-width dependence for more or
less all studied SMs– Interesting but not yet thoroughly investigated
• For more plots like this one, see http://ultralight.caltech.edu/hepwiki/PulseWidthSystematics
36
SM04SM04
37
SM04SM04
38
SM13SM13
39
SM13SM13
40
SM19SM19
41
SM19SM19
42
SM20SM20
43
SM20SM20
44
SM22SM22
45
SM22SM22
46
SM02 SM02 –– Low IntensityLow Intensity
47
SM02 SM02 –– Low IntensityLow Intensity
48
SM17 SM17 –– Low GainLow Gain
49
SM17 SM17 –– Low GainLow Gain
50
ResultsResults
SM # Runs Run Numbers* Stand Slope (err) [‰/ns]04 15 25067-81 H4 cosmic -2.01(16)13 14 19811-24 H4 cosmic -2.91(12)17 5 20753-57 H4 cosmic -2.58(18)19 15 21683-99 H4 cosmic -2.28(11)20 9 23254-63 H4 cosmic -2.39(13)22 13 13582-96 H4 test beam -2.04(41)
• Legend:– Slope = mean of a Gaussian fit to a distribution of 1700 values as in slide #9– Err = sigma of the Gaussian fit
• Note that the slope values are compatible across the different SMs• Two SMs measured incidentally with improper intensity settings – results not listed
here since the slope values are not usable.• Assuming single-value correction for all SMs, it’s maximum error would be roughly
(0.5 ‰/ns) × (2 ns) = 1 ‰ → might/might not be good enough, evaluation needed
*Some run numbers in the range might be excluded
51
SummarySummary
• Correlation of APD/PN and laser pulse width measured for all channels of 7 super modules – linear dependence observed
• Results are consistent with expectations based on laser-pulse-shape and electronics convolution simulation
• Some LM systematic structures observed
52
OutlookOutlook
• Fit quality monitoring– plot APD/PN stability distributions and crystal
maps – plot fits for single crystals (groups by TT's) – make misfit crystal maps run by run – make pull crystal maps run by run
• Apply width-based correction to TB data• Significant APD/PN stability improvement
expected• Stay tuned for new results
53
Chi2 and Log10(Chi2) for SM17Chi2 and Log10(Chi2) for SM17
54
Chi2 and Log10(Chi2) for SM17Chi2 and Log10(Chi2) for SM17