laser fundamentals - users.ntua.gr: ntua personal home...

83
Laser Fundamentals Electro-Optics & Applications Prof. Elias N. Glytsis School of Electrical & Computer Engineering National Technical University of Athens 23/01/2019

Upload: others

Post on 08-Apr-2020

13 views

Category:

Documents


4 download

TRANSCRIPT

Laser Fundamentals

Electro-Optics & Applications Prof. Elias N. Glytsis

School of Electrical & Computer Engineering National Technical University of Athens

23/01/2019

E1

E2

N1

N2

hν = E2 ‒ E1

E1

E2

N1

N2

hν = E2 ‒ E1

E1

E2

N1

N2

hν = E2 ‒ E1

Radiative Processes

Spontaneous Emission

Absorption

Stimulated Emission

2 Prof. Elias N. Glytsis, School of ECE, NTUA

For Blackbody Radiation:

Prof. Elias N. Glytsis, School of ECE, NTUA 3

L ight A mplification S timulated E mission R adiation

Radiative Processes of Stimulated Emission Basic Principle of laser Operation

http://www.laserfest.org/lasers/images/nero1.jpg

Prof. Elias N. Glytsis, School of ECE, NTUA 4

E1

E2

N1

N2

hν = E2 ‒ E1

Absorption

Spontaneous Emission

Stimulated Emission

Radiative Processes Relations Between Einstein’s Coefficients

Thermodynamic Equilibrium Boltzmann Statistics Einstein’s Coefficients

Prof. Elias N. Glytsis, School of ECE, NTUA 5

Lineshape Function

E1

E2

N1

N2 hν = E2 ‒ E1

Lineshape Function, g(ν) = Probability g(ν)dν for a photon to be - Spontaneously Emitted between ν and ν+dν - Absorbed between ν and ν+dν - Spontaneously Emitted between ν and ν+dν

Prof. Elias N. Glytsis, School of ECE, NTUA 6

Damped Oscillation

E1

E2

N1

N2 hν = E2 ‒ E1

Prof. Elias N. Glytsis, School of ECE, NTUA 7

Damped Oscillation (He-Ne laser transition λ0 = 0.6328μm)

Prof. Elias N. Glytsis, School of ECE, NTUA 8

Lineshape Function Spontaneous Emission Lifetime

Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle

E1

E2

N1

N2

hν = E2 ‒ E1 hν

E1 + x

E1 + x + hν

Prof. Elias N. Glytsis, School of ECE, NTUA 9

E1

E2

N1

N2

hν = E2 ‒ E1 hν

E1 + x

E1 + x + hν

Lineshape Function Spontaneous Emission Lifetime

Prof. Elias N. Glytsis, School of ECE, NTUA 10

Damped Oscillation with Elastic Collisions

Prof. Elias N. Glytsis, School of ECE, NTUA 11

Damped Oscillation with Elastic Collisions

Average over 1000 random events

Prof. Elias N. Glytsis, School of ECE, NTUA 12

Damped Oscillation with Elastic Collisions

Average over 1000 random events Average over 10000 random events

Prof. Elias N. Glytsis, School of ECE, NTUA 13

Damped Oscillation with Elastic Collisions

Prof. Elias N. Glytsis, School of ECE, NTUA 14

Damped Oscillation with Elastic Collisions

Average over 1000 random events

Prof. Elias N. Glytsis, School of ECE, NTUA 15

Homogeneous Spectrum Broadening

Characteristics of Homogeneous Broadening • Each atom in the system has a common emitting spectrum width Δv. • g(v) describes the response of any of the atoms (indistinguishable) • Finite interaction lifetime of the absorbing and emitting atoms Mechanisms of Homogeneous Broadening • The spontaneous lifetime of the excited state • Elastic collisions of an atom with other atoms or with the crystal (phonons) • Pressure broadening of atoms in a gas

Homogeneous Broadening can be described with a Lorentzian Lineshape

Prof. Elias N. Glytsis, School of ECE, NTUA 16

Inhomogeneous Spectrum Broadening

Features of Inhomogeneous Broadening • Individual atoms are distinguishable, each having a slightly different

frequency due to “seeing” slightly different environment • The observed spectrum of spontaneous emission reflects the spread in the

individual transition frequencies (not only the broadening due to the finite lifetime of the excited state)

Example Mechanisms of Inhomogeneous Broadening • The energy levels of impurity in a host crystal • Random strain • Crystal imperfections • Doppler effect in gases

Prof. Elias N. Glytsis, School of ECE, NTUA 17

Maxwell-Boltzmann Velocity Distribution

Prof. Elias N. Glytsis, School of ECE, NTUA 18

Maxwell-Boltzmann Velocity Distribution

Velocity Distributions along x-axis (laser light propagation)

Doppler Effect

Prof. Elias N. Glytsis, School of ECE, NTUA 19

Inhomogeneous Spectrum Broadening

Maxwell-Boltzmann velocity distribution

Lorentzian Lineshape for each velocity group

Velocity Distributions along x-axis (laser light propagation)

Prof. Elias N. Glytsis, School of ECE, NTUA 20

Inhomogeneous Spectrum Broadening

Average Lineshape Function

Voigt Lineshape Function

F. Schreir, “Optimized implementations of rational approximations for the Voigt and complex error function”, Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy & Radiative Transfer 112 (2011) 1010–1025

Prof. Elias N. Glytsis, School of ECE, NTUA 21

Inhomogeneous Spectrum Broadening

If Lorentzian Lineshape much narrower than Maxwell-Boltzmann then

Prof. Elias N. Glytsis, School of ECE, NTUA 22

Inhomogeneous Spectrum Broadening

Average Lineshape Function Comparison

ΔνG

ΔνL

Prof. Elias N. Glytsis, School of ECE, NTUA 23

Inhomogeneous Spectrum Broadening

Average Lineshape Function Comparison

ΔνG

ΔνL

ΔνV

Prof. Elias N. Glytsis, School of ECE, NTUA 24

Inhomogeneous Spectrum Broadening

Average Lineshape Function Comparison

Prof. Elias N. Glytsis, School of ECE, NTUA 25

Stimulated Emission Cross-Section and Induced Rate

E1

E2

N1

N2

hν = E2 ‒ E1

Absorption

Spontaneous Emission

Stimulated Emission

Prof. Elias N. Glytsis, School of ECE, NTUA 26

Gain Definition

E1

E2

N1

N2

hν = E2 ‒ E1

Absorption

Spontaneous Emission

Stimulated Emission

Active Medium

Prof. Elias N. Glytsis, School of ECE, NTUA 27

hν = E2 ‒ E1

E2, τ2

E0

N1

N2

N0

R1

R2

E1, τ1 1/τ20

1/τ1

abs

sp.em. st.em.

Gain Saturation

Rate Equations

Mass Conservation

Prof. Elias N. Glytsis, School of ECE, NTUA 28

Gain Saturation

Steady-State Solution

Prof. Elias N. Glytsis, School of ECE, NTUA 29

Gain Saturation

Below Threshold, Iν � 0

τ2/τ1 = 2 τ2/τ1 = 0.5

Prof. Elias N. Glytsis, School of ECE, NTUA 30

Gain Saturation Above Threshold, Iν ≠ 0, R1 = 0, τ1=0

τ2/τ1 = 2∙10+6 τ2/τ1 = 0.5

Prof. Elias N. Glytsis, School of ECE, NTUA 31

Gain Saturation

Above Threshold, Iν ≠ 0

τ2/τ1 = 200

Prof. Elias N. Glytsis, School of ECE, NTUA 32

Gain Saturation

Above Threshold, Iν ≠ 0

Nd-YAG Laser: τ1 = 30ns, τ2 = 255μs, τ2/τ1 = 8500

Prof. Elias N. Glytsis, School of ECE, NTUA 33

Gain Saturation Homogeneous Broadening

Prof. Elias N. Glytsis, School of ECE, NTUA 34

Gain Saturation Homogeneous Broadening

Example: A21 = 3.39 × 106 1/s, ΔN = 1015 cm-3, ΔνH = 17MHz, λ0 = 0.6328μm

Prof. Elias N. Glytsis, School of ECE, NTUA 35

Gain Saturation Inhomogeneous Broadening

Doppler Broadening

Prof. Elias N. Glytsis, School of ECE, NTUA 36

Gain Saturation Inhomogeneous Broadening

Limiting Cases

Prof. Elias N. Glytsis, School of ECE, NTUA 37

Gain Saturation Inhomogeneous Broadening

Example: A21 = 3.39 × 106 1/s, ΔN = 1015 cm-3, ΔνH = 17MHz, ΔνG = 1.5GHz λ0 = 0.6328μm

He-Ne Laser

Prof. Elias N. Glytsis, School of ECE, NTUA 38

Gain Saturation Inhomogeneous Broadening

Example: A21 = 3.39 × 106 1/s, ΔN = 1015 cm-3, ΔνH = 17MHz, ΔνG = 1.5GHz λ0 = 0.6328μm

He-Ne Laser

Prof. Elias N. Glytsis, School of ECE, NTUA 39

Gain Saturation Inhomogeneous Broadening

Example: A21 = 3.39 × 106 1/s, ΔN = 1015 cm-3, ΔνH = 17MHz, ΔνG = 1.5GHz λ0 = 0.6328μm

He-Ne Laser

Prof. Elias N. Glytsis, School of ECE, NTUA 40

Gain Saturation Homogeneous & and Inhomogeneous Broadening

From J. T. Verdeyen, “Laser Electronics” 3rd Ed. Prentice Hall, 1995

Homogeneous Broadening

Inhomogeneous Broadening

Prof. Elias N. Glytsis, School of ECE, NTUA 41

Electron Motion Equation

Classical Electron Oscillator Model

+

- - -

-

-

- -

-

-

+

E = 0 E � 0 z

E s(t) p

Simple Atom Model

External Electric Field

Prof. Elias N. Glytsis, School of ECE, NTUA 42

Classical Electron Oscillator Model Fourier Transform Pairs Electron Motion Equation

Electric Dipole Moment

Macroscopic Polarization

Prof. Elias N. Glytsis, School of ECE, NTUA 43

Classical Electron Oscillator Model

Macroscopic Polarization

He-Ne laser Example (inversion of N = 1010 cm-3 )

Prof. Elias N. Glytsis, School of ECE, NTUA 44

Stimulated Emission

Prof. Elias N. Glytsis, School of ECE, NTUA 45

(a) Parallel plane cavity: Highest mode volume and highest diffraction loss. Difficult to align. (b) The spherical cavity : Represents the functional "opposite" of the plane parallel cavity (a). It is easiest to align, has the lowest diffraction loss, and has the smallest mode volume. CW dye lasers are equipped with this type of cavity because a focused beam is necessary to cause efficient stimulated emission of these lasers. The spherical cavity is not commonly used with any other type of laser. (c) The long radius cavity: Improves on the mode volume, but does so at the expense of a more difficult alignment and a slightly greater diffraction loss than that of the confocal cavity. This type of cavity is suitable for any CW laser application, but few commercial units incorporate the long radius cavity. (d) The confocal cavity: A compromise between the plane parallel and the spherical cavities. The confocal cavity combines the ease of alignment and low diffraction loss of the spherical cavity with the increased mode volume of the plane parallel. Confocal cavities can be utilized with almost any CW laser, but are not in common use. (e) The hemispherical cavity : Actually is one half of the spherical cavity, and the characteristics of the two are similar. The advantage of this type of cavity over the spherical cavity is the cost of the mirrors. The hemispherical cavity is used with most low power He-Ne lasers because of low diffraction loss, ease of alignment, and reduced cost. (f) The long-radius-hemispherical cavity : Combines the cost advantage of the hemispherical cavity with the improved mode volume of the long-radius cavity. Most CW lasers (except low-power He-Ne lasers) employ this type of cavity. In most cases, r1 > 2L. (g) The concave-convex cavity : Normally is used only with high power CW CO2 lasers. In practice, the diameter of the convex mirror is smaller than that of the beam. The output beam is formed by the part of the beam that passes around the mirror and, consequently, has a "doughnut" configuration. The beam must pass around the mirror because mirrors that will transmit the intense beams of these high-power lasers cannot be constructed.

Common Resonators Types

http://www.repairfaq.org/sam/laserioi.htm#ioiresc

Prof. Elias N. Glytsis, School of ECE, NTUA 46

Laser Operation Basics

http://ehs.oregonstate.edu/laser/training/how-laser-works

Prof. Elias N. Glytsis, School of ECE, NTUA 47

Fabry-Perot Laser

E1

E2

N1

N2

hν = E2 ‒ E1

Absorption

Spontaneous Emission

Stimulated Emission

Pump

Prof. Elias N. Glytsis, School of ECE, NTUA 48

Fabry-Perot Laser

Resonance Conditions

Threshold Gain

Prof. Elias N. Glytsis, School of ECE, NTUA 49

Fabry-Perot Laser Frequency Pulling

2kℓ [ 1 + χ’/2n2 ]

2πm

2πm

2πm Frequency pulling

Frequency pulling

ν ν0

χ’ 2kℓ

νm νm

(νm-ν0) (Δν1/2/Δν)

-(νm-ν0) (Δν1/2/Δν)

Prof. Elias N. Glytsis, School of ECE, NTUA 50

Fabry-Perot with Gain

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Etalon-2.svg

Ii

It

Ir

G = 1 (no gain)

Prof. Elias N. Glytsis, School of ECE, NTUA 51

Fabry-Perot with Gain Gmax = 1.031147

Prof. Elias N. Glytsis, School of ECE, NTUA 52

3-Level and 4-Level Lasers

E2, τ2 E1, τ1

E2, τ2

E1

E3

E3

E0

hν = E2 ‒ E1

hν = E2 ‒ E1

Pumping

Pumping

Fast Decay

Fast Decay

Fast Decay

Ground State Ground State

Pump Level

Pump Level

3-Level System 4-Level System

Prof. Elias N. Glytsis, School of ECE, NTUA 53

hν = E2 ‒ E1

E2, τ2

E0

N1

N2

N0

R1

R2

E1, τ1

1/τ1

abs

sp.em. st.em.

Absorption zone

Laser Power Considerations

Prof. Elias N. Glytsis, School of ECE, NTUA 54

Laser Power Considerations

Below Threshold

Above Threshold

Steady-State

Prof. Elias N. Glytsis, School of ECE, NTUA 55

Laser Power Considerations

Power due to Stimulated Emission

Prof. Elias N. Glytsis, School of ECE, NTUA 56

Optimum Outcoupling (small losses, small gain, high Q)

A. Yariv and P. Yeh, Photonics, 6th Ed., Oxford University Press (2007)

Prof. Elias N. Glytsis, School of ECE, NTUA 57

Laser Oscillation for Homogeneous Broadening

From J. T. Verdeyen, “Laser Electronics” 3rd Ed. Prentice Hall, 1995

Prof. Elias N. Glytsis, School of ECE, NTUA 58

Laser Oscillation for Inhomogeneous Broadening

Prof. Elias N. Glytsis, School of ECE, NTUA 59

Laser Oscillation for Inhomogeneous Broadening

From J. T. Verdeyen, “Laser Electronics” 3rd Ed. Prentice Hall, 1995

Prof. Elias N. Glytsis, School of ECE, NTUA 60

Below Threshold

Above Threshold

Coldren and Corzine, Diode Lasers & Photonic Integrated Circuits, J. Wiley (1995)

Prof. Elias N. Glytsis, School of ECE, NTUA 61

From B.E.A. Saleh & M. C. Teich, “Fundamentals of Photonics” 2nd Ed. J. Wiley & Sons,2007.

Mode Selection - Tuning

Prof. Elias N. Glytsis, School of ECE, NTUA 62

Mode Selection - Tuning

From B.E.A. Saleh & M. C. Teich, “Fundamentals of Photonics” 2nd Ed. J. Wiley & Sons, 2007

Prof. Elias N. Glytsis, School of ECE, NTUA 63

Laser Dynamics – Simplified Two-Level System

E2, τ2

Pump

Lasing

E1, τ1

Ground State

N2

IL

Very fast

R1 R2

R3 R4

Pump

Laser Medium

Output IL

ℓg

Prof. Elias N. Glytsis, School of ECE, NTUA 64

Laser Dynamics – Simplified Two-Level System

Normalized Rate Equations

Prof. Elias N. Glytsis, School of ECE, NTUA 65

Laser Dynamics – Simplified Two-Level System Sub-threshold System – gth = 0.64 (S = 0.527292)

Prof. Elias N. Glytsis, School of ECE, NTUA 66

Laser Dynamics – Simplified Two-Level System Above-threshold System – gth = 0.64 (S = 0.527292)

Prof. Elias N. Glytsis, School of ECE, NTUA 67

Laser Dynamics – Simplified Two-Level System Above-threshold System – gth = 0.64 (S = 0.527292)

Prof. Elias N. Glytsis, School of ECE, NTUA 68

Laser Dynamics – Simplified Two-Level System Above-threshold System – gth = 0.64 (S = 0.527292) – Step Change

Prof. Elias N. Glytsis, School of ECE, NTUA 69

Laser Dynamics – Simplified Two-Level System Above-threshold System – gth = 0.64 (S = 0.527292) – Step Change

Prof. Elias N. Glytsis, School of ECE, NTUA 70

Laser Dynamics – Step Change in Excitation

From J. T. Verdeyen, “Laser Electronics” 3rd Ed. Prentice Hall, 1995

Prof. Elias N. Glytsis, School of ECE, NTUA 71 From J. T. Verdeyen, “Laser Electronics” 3rd Ed. Prentice Hall, 1995

Sinusoidal Response – gth = 0.64 (S = 0.527292)

Laser Dynamics – Simplified Two-Level System

Prof. Elias N. Glytsis, School of ECE, NTUA 72

Laser Dynamics – Simplified Two-Level System Sinusoidal Response – gth = 0.64 (S = 0.527292)

Prof. Elias N. Glytsis, School of ECE, NTUA 73

Mode Locking – Time Domain Consideration

From A. Siegman, “Lasers”, Univ. Science Books, 1986

Prof. Elias N. Glytsis, School of ECE, NTUA 74

Mode Locking – Time Domain Consideration

From A.E. Siegman, “Lasers”, Univ. Science Books, 1986

Prof. Elias N. Glytsis, School of ECE, NTUA 75

Mode Locking – Frequency Domain Consideration

From J. T. Verdeyen, “Laser Electronics”, 3rd Ed., Prentice Hall, 1995

Prof. Elias N. Glytsis, School of ECE, NTUA 76

Mode Locking – Frequency Domain Consideration

From J. T. Verdeyen, “Laser Electronics”, 3rd Ed., Prentice Hall, 1995

Prof. Elias N. Glytsis, School of ECE, NTUA 77

Mode Locking – Frequency Domain Consideration

From A. Yariv and P. Yeh, “Photonics”, 6th Ed., Oxford Univ. Press, 2007

Prof. Elias N. Glytsis, School of ECE, NTUA 78

Mode Locking – Frequency Domain Consideration

From A.E. Siegman, “Lasers”, Univ. Science Books, 1986

Prof. Elias N. Glytsis, School of ECE, NTUA 79

Mode Locking – Frequency Domain Consideration

L = 1m, n = 1, λ0 = 1μm, Δν = 1.50e+09Hz

Prof. Elias N. Glytsis, School of ECE, NTUA 80

Mode Locking – Frequency Domain Consideration

L = 2m, n = 1, λ0 = 1μm, Δν = 1.50e+09Hz

Prof. Elias N. Glytsis, School of ECE, NTUA 81

Q-Switching

From J. T. Verdeyen, “Laser Electronics”, 3rd Ed., Prentice Hall, 1995

Prof. Elias N. Glytsis, School of ECE, NTUA 82

A. Yariv and P. Yeh, Photonics, 6th Ed., Oxford University Press (2007)

Q-Switching Example Outputs Extraction Efficiency

Prof. Elias N. Glytsis, School of ECE, NTUA 83

Q-Switching Example Outputs

ni/nth= 1.649 ni/nth= 4.482

ni/nth= 2.718 ni/nth= 7.389

W. G. Wagner and B. A. Lengyel, J. Appl. Phys., vol. 34, Jul. 1963