language and social class

39
Language Variation Language and Social Class

Upload: hulbert45

Post on 24-Apr-2015

9.738 views

Category:

Education


8 download

DESCRIPTION

A quick overview of some of the key theories that look at whether our language use is influenced by our social class.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Language and social class

Language Variation

Language and Social Class

Page 2: Language and social class

The Royle Family

Page 3: Language and social class

Keeping up appearances

Page 4: Language and social class

So what is social class?

Page 5: Language and social class

Basil Bernstein

British sociologist Person / position oriented

families The deficit hypothesis Restricted and elaborated

speech codes

Page 6: Language and social class

Position-oriented families

Also called closed families (The Royle Family) Working class Personal (close physical contact) Context bound (shared surroundings) Likely to share common assumptions Inclined to imply rather than spell out meanings

Page 7: Language and social class

Person-oriented families

Also called open families Middle class More impersonal Context free (less dependent on

surroundings) Less likely to assume shared attitudes

Page 8: Language and social class

Task

Write a brief story using the following four pictures as your source.

Page 9: Language and social class

Picture 1

Page 10: Language and social class

Picture 2

Page 11: Language and social class

Picture 3

Page 12: Language and social class

Picture 4

Page 13: Language and social class

A possible story

Comments?

They're playing football and he kicks it and it goes through there and it breaks it and

they're looking at it and he comes out and shouts at them and they run off.

Page 14: Language and social class

A second version

Three boys are playing football and one boy kicks the ball and it goes through the window. The ball breaks the window and the boys are looking at it. A man comes out and shouts at them because they've broken the window so they run away.

Page 15: Language and social class

The Restricted Code

Characteristic of working class speech Short, simple sentences Limited vocabulary Frequent use of ‘you know’, etc Teachers speak in an elaborated code and

this accounts for the poor performance of the working class in education.

Page 16: Language and social class

The Elaborated Code

Characteristic of middle class speech Complex sentences, including subordination Extended vocabulary Use of the first person ‘I’ Teachers use of the elaborated code means that middle class

children do well in education

Page 17: Language and social class

Bernstein’s Influence

Caused enormous political outcry in the 1960s

Language enrichment and remedial programmes set up for working class children to overcome ‘deficiency’

Page 18: Language and social class

A Criticism of Bernstein

Everyone uses both the elaborated and restricted code

Everyone experiences position and person oriented family situations.

Language is not as fixed as implied. Language is on a linguistic and social

continuum.

Page 19: Language and social class

William Labov (1966)

American sociolinguist Challenged Bernstein’s deficit

model Studied the vernacular of Black

American youths (Language and the Inner City: 1966)

Page 20: Language and social class

Is there a God?

You know, like some people say if you’re good an’ shit, your spirit goin’ to heaven, n if you bad, your spirit goin’ to hell. Well bullshit! Your spirit goin’ to hell anyway, good or bad. ‘Cause, you see, doesn’t nobody really know that it’s a God, y’know, ‘cause I mean I’ve seen black gods, pink gods, white gods, all colour gods, and don’t nobody know it’s really a God. An’ when they be sayin’ if you good, you goin’ to heaven, that’s bullshit, ‘cause you ain’t goin’ to heaven, ‘cause it ain’t no heaven for you to go to.

Recorded in New York 1969

Page 21: Language and social class

Malcolm Petyt (1985)

Based in Bradford Study of the phonological variable /h/ in word

initial position Concluded that the omission of /h/ was a

major characteristic of West Yorkshire speech and that class was a significant factor in usage.

Conclusions…..

Page 22: Language and social class

Petyt’s study

Bradford

Page 23: Language and social class

Petyt’s findings…

Socio-economic

grouph-dropping

UMC 12%

LMC 28%

UWC 67%

MWC 89%

LWC 93%

Page 24: Language and social class

Line chart of Petyt’s findings

Page 25: Language and social class

Peter Trudgill (1974)

British sociolinguist Study of social class and regional dialect Research into both phonological and grammatical

variables in Norwich Used five social class divisions:

– LWC (Lower Working Class)– MWC (Middle Working Class)– UWC (Upper Working Class)– LMC (Lower Middle Class)– MMC (Middle Middle Class)

Page 26: Language and social class

Trudgill’s study

Norwich

Page 27: Language and social class

Trudgill’s findings for /ng/

Page 28: Language and social class

Phonological Variables

Study of the realisation of:– Word final /ng/ as in RP singing– Word medial /t/ as in RP bottle– Word initial /h/ as in the RP heart

Related findings to gender Related findings to careful and casual usage

Page 29: Language and social class

Trudgill’s findings…

The lower the social class the more frequent the regional pronunciation

Women tended to be closer to RP than regional pronunciation (insecurity?)

In casual speech MMC men preferred the regional forms (macho connotations?)

In careful speech MMC men preferred RP forms

Page 30: Language and social class

New York Department Stores Study

Labov explored link between incidence of /r/ producing and social class

/r/ production = prestige (in NY) Visited:

– Sacks (upper class)– Macy’s (middle class)– S. Klein (lower class)

Studied casual and emphatic use of post vocalic ‘r’ in the response, ‘The fourth floor.’

Page 31: Language and social class

Labov’s Findings…

32%

30%

31%

20%17%

4%

Sacks

Macy’s

S.Klein

All ‘r’ producing Some ‘r’ producing

Page 32: Language and social class

Task

– Determine social class by asking about family occupation and link to A, B, C1, C2, D and E

– Ask questions that will test:– Initial ‘h’ dropping in words like ‘hat’ and ‘house’– Word final realisation of ‘ng’ in words like ‘swimming’– Use of medial glottals in words like ‘butter’ and ‘batter’

– Write a conclusion that links your findings to those of Labov (commenting on methodology)

Now conduct your own version of Labov’s study:

Page 33: Language and social class

Cheshire’s study

Reading

Page 34: Language and social class

Peer Groups in Reading (1982)

Studying the relationship between grammatical variables and peer group culture

Long term participant observation Based around adventure playground in Reading Based on Cheshire’s own definition of social

class Disapproval (group A) / approval (group B) of

minor criminal activity, swearing and fighting

Page 35: Language and social class

Grammatical variables

They calls me names You has to do what teachers say You was with me I ain’t got no pedigree or nothing I never went to school today. Are you the ones what hit him? I come down here yesterday. You ain’t no boss.

Page 36: Language and social class

Cheshire’s findings…

Page 37: Language and social class

Lesley & James Milroy(1978, 1980, 1987)

Studied the language of working class communities in Belfast– Ballymacarrett (Protestant, low male

unemployment)– The Hammer (Protestant, substantial male

unemployment)– The Clonard (Catholic, substantial male

unemployment) Also studied gender and social networks

Page 38: Language and social class

The Milroys’ findings…

The stronger the social network the greater the use of vernacular forms

In Protestant Ballymacarrett, women used fewer vernacular forms than men and preferred prestige forms (c.f. Trudgill)

In the Hammer & Clonard, younger women preferred non-prestige forms as a way of showing social solidarity with their unemployed men

Page 39: Language and social class

Their conclusions…

Social networks within a class influence people’s language use.

Apparent norms, such as hypercorrection, can be reversed by the

need to express something more important.