lacan key terms, basic concepts
TRANSCRIPT
8/3/2019 Lacan Key Terms, Basic Concepts
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lacan-key-terms-basic-concepts 1/10
( '. y /)
LACAN: Key Terms, basic concepts .
. . h a way as to reveal the constructed nature
"Lacan rewrites Freud's pro~ect Ins~c oststructuralists Lacan attac~s what heof a certain historical self. like mo~ p sed to know, the subject of .
enerally cans the subject, t~e subject s~ppo f science etc. Often this reads as If~ertainty, the Cartesia~ subject, the ~UbJ:~!~I, but this is not so. All these ~efertohe is attacking the notion of the self Ing t ti n In order to reveal the baSically
a historically institutio~al~ze~ s~lf-r~pre~n '~-il~~ge, Lacan has to show that al.1unhealthy nature of this tnStltut~onaIZ~ se the immediate self-presence that It .
subjectivity is con~tructed an9 ISnot%'r:'PZust show how it is constructed, th~t IS,naturally thinks of Itself as being. An ~. k' d of presence. Their presence ISa
out of signs: ~igr:'Sof coufrsear~ a P~~~:~~r~~ce' in fact their presence iskind of precipitanon ou~0 a sys em tl' a being that is constitutedessentially bound up with absence ~onsequ~n y. This kind of revelation,through signs has the same kind of essence as sign,s. b' t m st reject at allLacan and others would hold, is just what the Cartesian ~u ~ec u. .costs because if it is true, then this self cannot be what It thinks of .'tself a~:etng.
And ~ince a whole host of actions in the world derive fro~ the.self-,,:nage, en awhole host of actions can suddenly not be what they had obviously been
before." (Tony Jackson, PHIL-LIt Discussio~ ~is.t,23 May 199~) 1: Language1.1. Lacan questions the symmetry and equilibrtum between ~lg~lfier and
signified in Saussure; he reverses the relationship signifierl signified to SIs,Signifier over signified. The bar separating the two stresses the cleavage .,
between them. The signified slips beneath the signifier, resists attempts to pm Itdown. Signifiers refer not to objects but to the chain of language, that is, to other
signifiers -- Lacan uses the metaphor of the signifying chain, the chain of speechcomprising the rings of a necklace that is a ring in another necklace made of
rings. The characteristic sense of being a person or having a personality comesfrom the self-perpetuating imperative that propels the signifying chain. Lacan
posits, then, the primacy to the signifier -- an active, colonizing power over the
signified.
1.2. the signifier is paradigmatic -- selected from and having value in relation to
other signifiers, and, hence, commutable (able to be replaced by another
signifier); the signified is sytagmatic, or contextual, having meaning in relation to
other signifieds (as in, 'meaning is only cultural')
1.3. the signifier represents a conceptualized reality, not reality itself ;1.4.
essentially, anything that means in a subject's world -- or to put it another way,
any thing that for the subject is the world -- is a signifier (a signifier is not just
language) however all of our signifiers are mediated by language. [KS, approx.]
TJ has this lengthier explanation: For the most part we "naturally" tend to assume
that signifiers ultimately refer to a signified that is itself and only itself, apart from
signs. The signified seems naturally the real thing, and the signifier simply stands
in for that real thing which in itself seems to need no sign in order to exist. But in
fact the real thing is just what you cannot have once you have signs. Once you
have signs, you can have, for human consciousness, "only" re-presentation. No
self-identical presence apart from signs can be discovered once you have signs
8/3/2019 Lacan Key Terms, Basic Concepts
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lacan-key-terms-basic-concepts 2/10
at all, because as Saussure argued (and the Saussurean turn to difference is
indispensable for all this), meaning is a function of a systematized difference
between signs. The real thing is constantty deferred, constantly getting away
precisely as we turn our (inevitably linguistic) attention to it. Think again of what itmeans that we should ever need signs. Try to imagine something existing for a
human consciousness apart from meaning which is always a function of signs.
1.5. we can have agreement on what words mean because there are points de
capiton, upholstery studs, that keep the signifier from shifting completely out of
our control.
1.6. like Heidegger Lacan believes it is impossible to step outside of language; in
a revision of Heidegger's empty and full speech, Lacan sees speech that carries
the illusion of the intact ego as empty, in the Imaginary register: the subject does
not speak but is spoken. Full speech follows the acceptance of the self as
existing in the domain of inter-subjectivity: one ceases to speak of oneself as an
object. [MS}1.7. analysts listen to what is not in the speech of the analysand, what s/he is not
saying -. listen to the patient's Other. [MS1
1.8. all speech is an effect; there is a difference between what a speaker meansand what the speakers words mean. (they mean more, Other, what is lacking,
etc.) [MS]
1.9. speech is the dimension by which the subject's desires are expressed and
articulated [MS]
1.10. however, language is of the Other, its meanings can never be fully
controlled, its prefabricated structures are inadequate to the expression of one's
desire [MSk]
1.11. the law that the father introduces is in particular the law of the languagesystem. [MS]
1.12. a reservation: that Lacan in locating the self and reality only in language,
thus effectively writing out visual and physical experience; this appears to
deracinate us from biology, history. [MSk] Lacan and other theorists (beginning
with Pierce) might reply that however 'real' biology and history (as existence in a
concrete universe) are, they are only experienced as real though our signifying
systems.
2. Metaphor and metonymy
2.1. following Jakobson; the function of selection, based on similarity, is seen as
metaphoric; Lacan as associates this with Freud's conception of condensation (in
The Interpretation of Dreams); the combinative function, based on contiguity, isseen as metonymic; Lacan associates this with displacement. (each has a tint of
the other). The metaphoric is associated with the concept of symptom, the
metonymic with the Origin of de sire. l.acan's preference is for metaphor -- the
ability of language to signify something other than what it says. All words are
metaphoric, mean much more than they mean -- are extensions in various ways:
see "The Insistence of the Letter ...". Metaphor is a system of implying and
imputing value. Metaphor implies choice, choice implies value judgment. [MS}
3. Language and absence
3.1. a signifier is always not its signified; language assures/creates the absence
8/3/2019 Lacan Key Terms, Basic Concepts
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lacan-key-terms-basic-concepts 3/10
of the object;
3.2. the subject as constituted in language is not itself -- the enunciating 'I' and
the enunciated T are different; the illusion of unity as all that is given -- as
language creates the illusion of the unity and stability of objects and the world.
3.3. "Language is empty because it is just an endless process of difference and
absence: instead of being able to possess anything in its fullness, the child will
now simply move from one signifier to another, along a linguistic chain which is
potentially infinite. Along this metonymic chain of signifiers, meanings, or
signifies, will be produced; but not object or person can ever be fully present in
this chain, because as we have seen with Derrida its effect is to divide and
differentiate all identities." [E]
3.4. "This potentially endless movement from one signifier to another is what
Lacan means by desire. All desire springs from a lack, which it strives continually
to fill. Human language works by such a lack: the absence of the real objects
which signs designate, the fact that words have meaning only be virtue of theabsence and exclusion of others." To enter language, then, is to become a prey
to desire: language, Lacan remarks, is what hollows being into desire. [E]
4. Unary and binary signifiers
4.1. The unary signifier is as it were the initial signifying break, the trace of
repression suffered by the drives -- as the mark of the subject's rupture with its
being. The drives have represented the last, already partially mediated contact of
the subject with its being; the unary signifier attests to the permanent
disappearance of that being ....The unconsciousness is the area where these se/f-
losses as well as future ones are inscribed. [KS]
4.2. The lack of referent or order opens up a world of play, of differences, in
which the binary signifiers make their structures: the non-meaning of the unarysignifier initiates the process of endless displacements and substitutions which
comprise Signification within the Lacanian scheme. [KS]
4.3. At the same time, by deracinating the subject from contact with itself, and
opening it up to the structure of binary signifiers, the unary signifier deprives the
subject of any autonomy, is henceforth wholly subordinated to the field of social
meaning and desire. [KS1
4.4. the binary signifier is the construction of signification in terms of difference
and relation, and this forms a closed signifying system -- e.g. father and mother
form each the meaning of the other, neither is complete without the other. This is
the creation of paradigmatic and syntagmatic relationships.
4.5. Lacan attributes to the binary signifier a number of momentous and closelyconnected events: the creation of meaning; the exclusion of the drives; the
formation of the unconscious; the emergence of the subject into the symbolic
order, otherwise known as the field of the Other; and the inauguration of desire.5.
the Mirror Stage
5.1. At the mirror stage the infant is able to imagine itself as a coherent and self-
governing entity; there is a sense of difference from the Other - the burden of
identity is to be not whole; the Other warrants the existence of the child; this is an
armor of alienating identity, the child moves from insufficiency to anticipation.
[MS]
8/3/2019 Lacan Key Terms, Basic Concepts
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lacan-key-terms-basic-concepts 4/10
5.2. identity does not equal identification; the subject will never be truly himself or
herself; when the fragmented body gives way to the armor of the subject, the
ego is formed.
5.3. the ego is the enemy, constituted by alienating identifications [MS]5.4. human subjects continue through life to look for an imaginary wholeness and
unity [MS15.5. the subject is comprised of lack, the lack of being that results from the
subject's dependence on the Other. The Other is the place where the subject is
born. [MS]
5.6. the narcissistic process whereby by identifying with images we bolster up a
fictive sense of unitary selfhood. [E]
5.7. "The mirror event in Lacan's terms is the opening, so to speak, of the ego.
The child must go through some initial form of recognizing itself as a separate
object in the world. In order to identify itself as a self, it must see itself as a self
among selves. But this if you think about it is an odd moment. How can youidentify yourself unless you are some how apart from yourself precisely in order
to recognize yourself? This is true implicitly in the very notion of self-
identification. You must be a split self in order to think of yourself as a self at all,
and in fact in order to be a self as we take that word. The concept of self-
identification requires both sameness and difference to make sense, though
typically the difference is misrecognized by the infant." (TJ Jun. 1/95»)
6. the subject
6.1. the subject and the self are socially produced [MS]; the subject is constituted
by the symbolic, by the intersubjective system of language and culture into which
the subject is born [MSk]
6.2. the subject is not a person but a position, an 'I' dehinged relationally, by hisor her difference from the 'you' he or she addresses [MSk]
7. the Imaginary
7.1. a condition in which we lack any defined center of self, in which what self we
have seems to pass into objects and objects into it, in a ceaseless closed
exchange [E J
7.2. the Imaginary surely drives from the experience of the image -- and of the
imago --and we are meant to retain its spatial and visual connotations. [J]
7.3. The Imaginary may thus be described as a peculiar spatial configuration,
whose bodies primarily entertain relationships of inside/outside with one another,
which is them traversed and reorganized by that primordial rivalry and
transitivistic substitution of imagoes, that indistinction of primary narcissism andaggressivity, from which our conceptions of good and evil derive.[J]
7.4. "That order of the subject's experience which is dominated by identification
and duality ... not only precedes the symbolic order, which introduces the subject
to language and Oedipal triangulation, but continues to coexist with it afterward.
The two registers complement each other, the symbolic establishing the
differences which are such and essential part of cultural existence, and the
imaginary making it possible to discover correspondences and homologies. The
imaginary order is most classically exemplified by the mirror stage." [KS]
8. The Real: history itself [J] ; That which is in the world but beyond signification.
4
8/3/2019 Lacan Key Terms, Basic Concepts
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lacan-key-terms-basic-concepts 5/10
9. The Ego
9.1. identity does not equal identification; the subject will never be truly himself or
herself; when the fragmented body gives way to the armor of the subject the ego
is formed.9.2. the ego is the enemy, constituted by alienating identifications [MS]
9.3. human subjects continue through life to look for an imaginary wholeness and
unity [MS]
9.4. the subject is comprised of lack, the lack of being that results from the
subject's dependence on the Other. The Other is the place where the subject is
born. [MS]
9.5. the ego is a function or effect of a subject which is always dispersed, never
identical with itself, strung out along a the chains of the discourses which
constitute it. [E)
9.6. the imaginary unity of the enunciated and enunciating I [E]
9.7. the pronoun I stands in for the ever-elusive subject, which will always slipthrough the nets of any particular piece of language; and this is equivalent to
saying that I cannot mean and-be simultaneously. I am not which I think, I think
where I am not, wrote Lacan. [E]
9.8 "To be ever so brief, the ego, to Lacan, is what is formed as the human
organism is absorbed into signs or symbols and in the process squeezed out of
what Lacan calls the real. Now while there is always an ego, the nature of any
particular ego can vary depending first on both the sign systems through which it
is constituted and its particular processing through those signs. So though an
analyst always confronts a personal history and an individual voice, he also
confronts generic voices that are speaking the person, so to speak." (Tony
Jackson Phil-Lit post April 95)9.9 'When Lacan speaks of the unconscious as being structured like a language
he means that its nature and interpretation are analogous to language as
described by Saussure and those who have come after him. Confronted with the
self, we have the speaking voice, the "conscious" self, the one who is called into
a kind of presence through a name. But this self, like any piece of language
cannot occur in a vacuum. Its total meaning/being cannot be present just in it
self, as total meaning/being is fundamentally not present in language. A given
piece of language takes on meaning because of its structured difference from
other pieces of language. What we have before us is the one piece of language,
but when we search out its meanings, we turn to systematically related pieces of
language that are at once indispensably "present" and entirely absent, that isunconscious. In a sense unspoken rules of discourse operate to repress, to filter
out all but a particular set of meanings, though as literary types know especially
well, the filter can be ever so changeable. The manifest self, similarly, must arise
from a systematic and unconscious repression of the difference by which it is
constituted. We are getting structured, so to speak, by and as signs in the most
fundamental way before we can think or reflect upon meaning, value etc. We
have as adults a given sense of self, but that given or manifest self is inhabited or
constituted by a system of signs that are not readily available to consciousness
precisely because the consciousness in question is given its nature by the
8/3/2019 Lacan Key Terms, Basic Concepts
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lacan-key-terms-basic-concepts 6/10
system of signs and much of the specificity of that system was set in place before
all but the most rudimentary thinking was possible. An observer can, however,
from studying the actual signsllanguage of the self in question, the way the self
speaks, make inferences about the constitutive signification (unconscious) of thatself." (TJ 31 Mar 1995)
10. Unconscious
10.1. for Lacan what is important about Freud's ideas of the unconscious is not
that the unconscious exists but that it has a structure [MS]
10.2. the rhetoric of the unconscious is its deep structures which create meaning
through certain patterns of repetition and exchange.
10.3. the subject [the self] is comprised of lack, the lack of being that results from
the subject s dependence on the Other. The Other is the place where the subject
is born. [MS]
10.4. the unconscious comes to being only in language [MSk]
10.5. the unconscious is Other -- the human subject is divided; the unconscious
has a linguistic structure; the subject is inhabited by the Other; [MS]
10.6. the unconscious always attains its goal, even if by deferral. the
unconscious is the discourse of the Other because the Subject does not know
that he desires what the Other desires. That Other is, in Lacan, the Oedipal
drama (the father is the real Other) [parents are Object grande A ); but it is also
that part of the self which the Subject always fails to recognize (or misrecognizes,
as Lacan says) because he does not know it is a part of himself; his ownunconscious. [FM]
10.7. the separation from the mother under the pressure of the law -- the desire
for the mother is driven underground; it is only when the child acknowledges the
taboo or prohibition which the father symbolizes that it represses its guilty desire,
and that desire just is what is called the unconscious [E]10.8. the unconscious is just a continual movement and activity of signifiers,
whose signifieds are often inaccessible to us because they are repressed. [E]
10.9. The unconsciousness is the area where the self-losses of Signification, of
the unary signifier cutting the subject off from its last vestige of contact with itself,
the already partially-mediated drives, are inscribed. [KS]
10.10. the unconscious is the discourse of the Other because the Subject does
not know that he desires what the Other desires. That Other is in Lacan the
Oedipal drama (the father of the real Other); but it is also that part of himself
which the Subject always fails to recognize (or misrecognizes, as Lacan says)
because he does not know it is a part of himself; his own unconscious. [FM]
10.11. the unconscious is not some seething, tumultuous, private region insideus, but an effect of our relations with one another. The unconscious is, so to
speak, outside rather than within us -- or rather it exists between us , as our
relationships do. I t is elusive not so much because it is buried deep within our
minds, but because it is a kind of vast, tangled network which surrounds us and
weaves itself through us, and which can therefore never be pinned down. [E]
11. The Law of the Father
11.1. refers in the first place to the social taboo on incest, but in a sense more
importantly, it is a recognition of the larger familial and social structure of which-6
8/3/2019 Lacan Key Terms, Basic Concepts
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lacan-key-terms-basic-concepts 7/10
the self is (only a) part in a role which is already there for it, laid down for it bythe pra9!£§ of the soc~ty into which it h~isbeen born. -_ --.,,-------
11.2. tne law that the father introduces in particular is the I~w of the language
system.11.3. the appearance of the Father drives the child from its mother's body and in
doing so drives the desire for union underground into the unconscious (creates-- ... -~the unconscious). The Law and the unconscious appear at the same moment.
11.4. The mirror stage initiates a process which CUlminates in the Oedipus
process or-paternal metaphor. The child submits to the Law of the Father. The
paternal figure serves to !i~arate the child rromanalf-encompassing relation
with the mother. The Father represents the Law, embodies the power of the~ . - - - - - - - -~ --~-."--'------~nd the threat of castration. Accepting his authority and phallic status is
the precondition of the child s ha\7lngaQlace within the socio-~y_,!!!!olJ.c~Q_rd~r,
name and a speaking position .... The Phallus subjects_Roth sexest() !be
Symbolic.] ------- --------- -~1'1.5.the separation oJfrom the mother under the p~essure of the law -- thedesire for tlieillOTher ISdriven underground; it is only when the child
acknowledges the taboo or prphibition which the father symbolizes that it
represses its gUiltyoestre, and1hafaesire just is what is called th_e_J!!1cQ!}~cious------~'-.-~=~.-.~-.~ --, .._-
11.6. the IJn£~s is the discourse of the Other because the Subject does not
know that he desires what theOtherdesires. That Other is in Lacan the Q~diR~
dr(i_~!lJthe father of the real Other); but it is also ~~a~rt o ! _ ~ J ! ! : 1 ~ ~ l fwhich theSubject always fails to recognize (or misrecognizes, as Lacan says) because he
does not know it is-a-part of hImself; his own unconscious.
12. The symbolic register12.1. Lacan mapped on to Freud's concept of the oedipal process -- crossing the
frontier out of the Imaginary, the dyadic world of mother and child, tothe Father's
name and his Law; this is the realm of th~§Y!!1bolic. Lacan followed Levi-Strauss
in idea that culture based on incest,-ondifference-and rules: Levi-Strauss use the
model of Linguistics, so too Lacan [a fundamental Structuralist move]. [MS]
12.2. The s...Y_r.!1_l?_~egister of culture and language introduces a mediating thirdterm to the idea of the subject and the missing complement (imaginary and mirror
stages'rapprox.), to strl!c~~_r~subjecti~~round a lack, thereby providing thesubject-access, not to pleasure, but tode~i.re ....A subject can desire only in terms
of the di§ion that occurs through thErsY..r.!l:bolicemre~_~Q!~!!gnf theg~~ired
~t?~ (the object 'a'), which in turn symbQli~~~_th.~_ITlQQ~~Jbi!~ty()L~.Y~[.~I!!.isfyi~gde~ir.~_<:;9_~plete!y-- -
12.3. The symbolic register provides the terms by which cuLtLJr~J~Ilse.ru1ers
subjectivity through its organizations ofunc()O~ciousdesires. As Lacan describes
therfClfiese lerms are quite s~~ill~to _tb~~_P_atr.tar.cltaL<i(p~rf modern western
culture (i.e. the symbolic register is culture~specinc) [CS]
12.4. As Oedipal complex: The Father triangulates the dual relationship of
Mother and Child. Representing the Law of th~..E~the~__(the_~!IJtura!J:~le~),s theprohibition of the Child s desire for the Mother, the phalluunot -- but with
difficulty not -- to be confused with the penis) the~~~!YJthrough symbols)
1
8/3/2019 Lacan Key Terms, Basic Concepts
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lacan-key-terms-basic-concepts 8/10
regulates desire throuqh the threat of castration. Male and Female are
constructed (in the SymooilC}ln·relatlorito the c~stratin_glack symbolized by the
phallus. Male: I have that lack; Female: I am that Lack. Male and Female are
symbolic positions; as such they are va.Iia.bJe.ran be taken up , etc.12.5 The subject o~es between the imaginaiYjlnd the.sympQlic .register --
she does not ;Ieave the imaginary behind when she enters the symbolic, but in
the works of MacCabe, ~:es, we are constantlyir:!1_C!9l!1ingurselves grantin~
some fullll2eanin9 to th~e sQe.aiUthe imaginary register], and constantly
being surprised to find them determined by relations outside our control [thesymbolic register]. ~'" . .------------ --~.
13. Lack, desire
13.1. lack is created by three main moves: the territorialization of the drives, the
mirror stage in which the self realizes distinctiveness and otherness -- limits to
the self -- and signification, at which point the self is inducted into the symbolic
order.13.2. The potentially endless movement from one signifier to another is what
Lacan means by desire. All desire springs from a lack, which it strives continually
to fill. Human language works by such a lack: the absence of the real objects
which signs designate, the fact that words have meaning only be virtue of the
absence and exclusion of others. To enter language, then, is to become a prey to
desire: language, Lacan remarks, is what hollows being into desire. [E]
13.3. Desire commences as soon as the drives are split off from the subject,
consigned forever to a state of non-representation and non-fulfillment. In short, it
begins with the subject's emergence into meaning. [KS]13.4. Desire has its origins not only in the alienation of the subject from its being,
but in the subject s perception of its distinctness from the objects with which itearlier identified. [KS]
13.5. severed from our mother's body, we have to make do instead with
substitute objects, what Lacan calls the 'object little a', with which we try vainly to
plug the gap at the center of our being. We move among substitutes for
substitutes, metaphors for metaphors, never able to recover the pure (if fictive)
self-identity and self-completion which we knew in the imaginary. [14. Analysis
14.1. what the analyst must do is reply to what he/she hears; that reply sends
back to the subject in inverted form what s/he is saying that s/he could never
hear, if s/he did not hear it coming from the analyst. Thus is accomplished the
recognition that is the goal of analysis, the recognition by the subject. The subjectmust come to know his or her own drives, which are insisting, unbeknownst to
him or her, in his or her discourse and actions. The analyst returns to the subject
what the subject was saying so the subject can recognize it and stop saying it.
The analyst encourages the analysand to encounter his or her own Other. [MS]
15. Suture
15.1 in representations of experience (film, narrative) the reader is constantly
faced with occupying subject positions called forth by the text, and hence is
created or at least is positioned by the text. This required insertion of the self into
the text is known as suture, particularly in cinematic versions of Lacanian theory.
8/3/2019 Lacan Key Terms, Basic Concepts
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lacan-key-terms-basic-concepts 9/10
16. Lacanian literary criticism
In general terms Lacanian theory applied to literature16.1 supports poststructural ideas of the fragmentation of the self and links these
ideas to the idea of intertextuality -- that all textuality is made up of meaningsconstituted by filiation and difference which are broadly cultural in scope, and
which force one to challenge the borders of the text. Insofar as a text has borders
these borders are then diagnostic (they tell us something about the meanings,
the implications, teh connections,of the text), and they link rather than separating.
16.2. has also pointed to the key functions of lack and desire in not only in the
constitution of various texts but in writing itself. It has opened language and
reference to a broad field of potential, and dynamic, meaning and has in creased
awareness of both the ambiguity and the complexity/density of structured
language use.
16.3. ties together the writer and culture, the text and the reader, at the level of
language, which level for Lacan is also both cultural, and an access to what islost, is desired, haunts and escapes us, which losses and desires form the
substance, such as there is one, of our selves.
16.4. draws attention to structures of the text -- repetitions and gaps and closures-- as essential and indeed key parts of the meaning of the text. In this it is dose
to much of what deconstruction does and looks at.
16.5. focuses often not on the text itself (if that could be considered an separate
object) but on the exchange mediated by (or, created or named by) the text; on
structures of the text, but as they are dynamically constituted or realized by the
reader
16.6. Both the author and the reader are positions, not individuals, just as the textis a process-field, not an object.
16.7. As textuality structures language, they both and together engage us in the
processes of desire and bring us closer to the other, and away from the illusory
narcissism of the individual self: we enter in a dynamic and concentrated way the
world of the unconscious which is also the world of the other: the world of
meaning and being which is culturally constructed and so connects us to the
meanings of our culture and to the presence and power of the drives which
create and sustain us of persons in a world of persons.
16.8. as we read, we are in effect analyzed by the text -- positioned, opened to
the nature and reality of our desires and our relations, brought closer to the
reality of our beings which is our unconscious; interpreters, instead of masteringthe text a re mastered by it. [MSk, in reference to Felman s work in particular}.
16.9 builds on Freud's by looking for the unconscious in the text's performative
aspects, in being suspicious of its rhetorical as well as representational strategies
-- as Freud's too often were not. It therefore emphasizes a new dimension of
reading.
16.10. MSk writes that "In an effort to counter reductive analogizing either to a
signified reality (the New Critic's heresy of paraphrase) or the psychology of a
unified author or reader (the intentional or affective fallacies), Lacanian criticism
is in danger of short-circuiting the particularity of this language." -- and goes on to
8/3/2019 Lacan Key Terms, Basic Concepts
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lacan-key-terms-basic-concepts 10/10
cite the dissolving of structure into psychic process and the expansion of
reference to a limitless field of reference chains. Her remark is in a sense a
typical anti-poststructural claim, in that she wants to reinstate the text as a
privileged, separate and internally-controlled object. A Lacanian might read this
desire for wholeness and retrievable identity with some suspicion.
16.11. because subjectivity and the unconscious are created by language and
work like language does, Lacan, in apparently erasing the boundaries between
literature and psychoanalysis, has in fact placed reading and literature in a
privileged position, because: ultimately in his understanding we are (as
meaningful beings, as human) readers whose reading takes us further and
further into the intricacies of the self and culture, and the (self-)deceits of those
who would assert and enforce a reality build on what is known and observable;
[sort of from MSk1
• we are beings who live in the presence of (or, what is the same thing, in
the manifest absence of) what they desire but cannot have, desiring a
completeness and a mastery which, through the very conditions of the
world, they can never have;
• are being is constituted through language, hence all is text, in a sense
different from Oerrida s there is nothing outside of the text.
10