laboratory 2 steel copy

Upload: dropped95si

Post on 03-Jun-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/12/2019 Laboratory 2 Steel Copy

    1/8

    Laboratory 2: Properties of an Unknown Type of Steel

    ME 3034-001

    2/17/13

    Abstract

  • 8/12/2019 Laboratory 2 Steel Copy

    2/8

    Unknown Type of Steel was tested to determine its material properties. The

    tensile test was conducted on eleven steel samples, which were unknown type of

    steel. From the data the average values for Modulus of Elasticity, Ultimate Tensile

    Strength (UTS) and Yield Stress for each sample were obtained. The average values

    are Modulus of Elasticity = 24.72 *10^6 [psi], UTS = 45640 [psi] and Yield Strength =

    25181 [psi]. The finding of this experiment allowed to make an educated guess on

    the type of steel that was tested which is either Cast Iron Grey Class 60 or nodular

    (ductile Iron).

    Introduction

    The objective of the experiment is to determine the type of steel by testing

    the material properties of each sample. The tensile testing was conducted using

    Instron Tensile Testing Machine on eleven samples to obtain material properties.

    Material properties are Modulus of Elasticity, Ultimate Tensile Strength (UTS) and

    Yield Strength. Samples of steel are of an unknown type and from the tensile testing

    the conclusion on the type of the steel is made.

    Modulus of elasticity is obtained from the graph of Stress vs. Strain, Modulus of

    Elasticity, which is the slope of the elastic region of the Stress vs. Strain curve. The

    UTS can be obtained from the maximum stress value on the graph, and the yield

    strength can be obtained using 0.0022 % method offset on the graph.

    Modulus of elasticity was then determined from the collected data.

    Modulus of Elasticity or Youngs Modulus (E) is defined by Hookes Law:

    Hooks Law:

    E =

    (1)

    Where:

    Stress [psi]

    = Strain [in./in.]

    =

  • 8/12/2019 Laboratory 2 Steel Copy

    3/8

    Stress:

    (2)

    Where:

    Stress[psi]

    F = Force (lb)

    A = Cross Sectional Area (in.2)

    Strain:

    =l lo

    lo (3)

    Where:

    Strain

    l= Length after force is applied

    lo= Gauge length

    Experimental Methods

    The experiment was conducted using Instron Tensile Testing Machine, Figure 1, and

    Merlin tensile test program.

    Figure 1. Instron Tensile Test Machine

    =F

    A

    =

    lb

    in.2

    (in.

    in.)

    (in.)

    (in.)

  • 8/12/2019 Laboratory 2 Steel Copy

    4/8

    Wear safety goggles and making sure the machine is safely closed for operation. The

    steps of this experiment: Clamp down the top part of the sample into the jaws of the

    Instron Machine. Connect extensometer and set the gauge length to 1 inch. Clamp

    down the bottom part of the sample into the Instron Tensile Test Machine; Balance

    the load in the Merlin program, and input length and width of the sample. Then run

    the Test. The output is then the elongation and the load applied of the samples.

    Testing Method: Tensile Test

    Equipment used: Calipers, Instron Tensile Test Machine, Merlin Tensile Test

    program.

    Materials used: Eleven samples of an unknown type of steel

    Analysis/Results

    Modulus of Elasticity, Ultimate Tensile Strength (UTS), and Yield Stress was

    determined from this experiment by tensile testing eleven samples of an unknown

    type of steel. The results are shown in Table 1 for each sample, and the average

    values were computed.

    Table 1. Material Properties of Steel Samples

    Sample # Modulus [10^6 psi] Yield Strength UTS [psi]1 24.3 22500 41550

    2 25.3 22000 44544

    3 19.6 21500 41980

    4 27.2 21500 42279

    5 31.9 23500 45825

    6 26.5 26500 52974

    7 26.7 27500 53794

    8 26.3 24500 46095

    9 20.2 20500 43075

    10 19.6 23000 43312

    11 24.3 22000 42622

    Average 24.72 25181 45640

    The average values of the samples can be compared to standards (i.e. MatWeb.com).

    Then determine the type of steel that was used, which either Cast Iron Grey Class 60

    or nodular (ductile Iron). The comparison was done using the average values and a

  • 8/12/2019 Laboratory 2 Steel Copy

    5/8

    reference. Figure 2 shows stress vs. strain curve for all eleven samples of unknown

    type of steel.

    Figure 2. Stress vs. Strain curve

    From Table 1 and Figure 2, the average values are Modulus of Elasticity = 24.72

    *10^6 [psi], UTS = 45640 [psi] and Yield Strength = 25181 [psi]. From this and the

    average modulus of elasticity of the samples that was compared to the standard. The

    samples was determined to be Cast Iron Grey Class 60, or nodular (ductile Iron).

    From this Experiment mechanical properties of the steel samples were determined.

    All of the samples behaved in a similar way, however there were some fluctuations.

    The average value was used to compare to the standards.

    Discussion/Conclusion

    y = 17.6E+06x

    0

    10,000

    20,000

    30,000

    40,000

    50,000

    60,000

    0.000 0.100 0.200 0.300 0.400 0.500 0.600

    S

    tress[lb/in.2

    ]

    Strain [ in./in.]

    Sample # 1 Sample 2

    Sample 3 Sample 4

    Sample 5 SAmple 6

    Sample 7 Sample 8

    Sample 9 Sample 10

    Sample 11 Linear (E)

  • 8/12/2019 Laboratory 2 Steel Copy

    6/8

    The findings of this experiment confirm that the unknown type of steel is either Cast

    Iron Grey Class 60 or nodular (ductile Iron). If a material has certain mechanical

    properties than that material can be determined just by comparing the mechanical

    properties of the standards or to known values for known type of material.

    This test could have been done to almost any type of metal or material.

    Some of the data points had to be discarded, either due to negative values or

    slippage of the Instron Tensile Testing Machine. Negative values and slippage values

    were discarded so that the accurate Modulus of Elasticity could be computed.

    Some of the error sources are from not clamping down the jaws of the Instron

    Machine tight enough, getting incorrect data, extensometer could be off, therefore

    the measurement could have been a little off.

  • 8/12/2019 Laboratory 2 Steel Copy

    7/8

    Table of Contents

    Page Number

    Abstract 1

    Introduction 1

    Experimental Methods 2

    Analysis/Results 3

    Discussion/Conclusion 5

    References 7

  • 8/12/2019 Laboratory 2 Steel Copy

    8/8

    References

    Callister, William D. Material Science and Engineering An Introduction. New York:

    John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2010

    http://www.alliance.seas.upenn.edu

    http://www.engineersedge.com/manufacturing_spec/properties_of_metals_strengt

    h.htm

    https://alliance.seas.upenn.edu/~medesign/wiki/index.php/Courses/MEAM247-11C-P2P1https://alliance.seas.upenn.edu/~medesign/wiki/index.php/Courses/MEAM247-11C-P2P1https://alliance.seas.upenn.edu/~medesign/wiki/index.php/Courses/MEAM247-11C-P2P1