kuwait case study short version
DESCRIPTION
Kuwait Case Study Short VersionTRANSCRIPT
-
Accidental Explosion Case Study
Kuwait National Petroleum Company, Mina Al-Ahmadi Refinery vapor cloud explosion, 26 June 2000
Quentin A. Baker
*
Sequence of EventsJune 26, 2000
TimeEvent03:55Shift leader smelled hydrocarbon while driving by. Called fire departmentObserved ice block 2 x 2m on several pipes; vertical plume emanating from the iceFire department put water on the plume to knock down vaporsAttempts to identify which pipe was leaking and to isolate the pipe~04:57Pipe ruptured; Evacuated the area+5-7 minExplosion; most witness report a single big explosion; no accounts of prolonged delays
*
Release Location
*
North Section of Ruptured PipelineSouth Section of Ruptured Pipeline
*
Rheniformer UnitsFin Fans
*
*
Condensate Composition
Material%Vol%VolC12.281.9C28.6C336.5iC48.8nC425.8iC56.618.1nC57.5C62.6C7+1.1Other0.3
*
Flammable Cloud10 inch pipe450 psig condensateDischarge rate 926 kg/s (2042 lb/s)LFL up to 550 mFlammable mass up to 79,000 lbLFLWind NW @ 11 kn
*
Apparent Direction of Flame TravelIgnition
*
Buildings to East
*
Collapse of Masonry Buildings
*
Typical Blast Damage IndicatorsWindow and Masonry Wall
*
Pressure Contours (0.25, 0.5, 1, 3, 5 psi)1 psi @ 1139 ft
*
Impulse Contours (30, 50, 100, 300, 500 psi-ms)100 psi-ms @ 2500 ft
*
Best EstimateBest estimate is Case 2: 7.39 x 1011 in-lb (83,530 MJ)Equivalent to ~ 6,040 lb (2,740 kg) of condensateEquivalent to ~ 40,800 lb (18,500 kg) TNTAbout 5.2% of the the flammable cloudCurrent Technology Cooperative methodology about 9% higher than Best Estimate
*
Furnace Damage
*
Sway of Equipment Foundation Damage, Secondary Leaks
*
LossesFour fatalities, 50 injuries (low staffing at 5:00 a.m.)Estimated property damage ~$450MMEstimated business interruption ~500MMLoss of 485,000 bpd refining capacity to meet country demands