kristen k. tiscione june 2014 the history of rhetoric

34
KRISTEN K. TISCIONE JUNE 2014 The History of Rhetoric

Upload: abigayle-mosley

Post on 11-Jan-2016

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

KRISTEN K. TISCIONEJUNE 2014

The History of Rhetoric

Rhetoric is the art of “discovering in the particular case what are the available means of persuasion.”

— Aristotle, RHETORIC (c. 333 BCE)

Logic Rhetoric

the invention and arrangement of ideas that lead to truth

(the philosopher)

the invention, arrangement, and expression of ideas that lead to probable truth

(the politician, lawyer)

The Trivium

Grammar LogicRhetoric

The art of inventing The art of The art of and combining symbols thinking communication to communicate

Ramism

Logic – invention arrangement

Rhetoric – invention arrangement expression beauty

style

Rhetoric disappears as a school subject

Writing (English)

Literature – (how to read)

Composition (how to write)

Speaking (Speech)

Rhetorical criticism

(how to evaluate speech)

Speech(how to speak)

Impact on legal education

Doctrinal – inventionCourses arrangement

true principles of law

Legal – expression Writing Courses

+inventionarrangement

(theory)

(practice)

scientific case method

Invention in Legal Writing

• the holding of a case

• synthesized legal rules

• analogies

No “true” law

Q: What is negligence?

A: It depends . . . on the jurisdiction, the case law, the lawyer who interprets it, and the judge who applies it.

What does this all mean for us?

Ramus was wrong: theory and practice are inseparable –

Ideas and knowledge cannot exist in society outside their expression

Aristotle was wrong: all knowledge is probable and a product of the rhetorical process

Rhetoric uses logic and grammar to produce knowledge

Law is the product of rhetoric

AdministratorsLegislatorsRegulators LAWConstituencies Judges AdvocatesPartiesScholars

1nventionarrangement +expression

Teaching law as rhetoric

If law is a function of rhetoric, rhetorical theory helps us understand

the lawmaking processhow to persuade and participate in the

processhow to teach the process, and how to teach it better

KIRSTEN K. DAVISJUNE 2014

Using Rhetorical Theory and Method to Study Legal

Communication

Rhetoric: Kirsten’s Definition

The ability to use or understand how others use symbols to

reason from shared assumptions, increase identification between “speaker” and

“audience,” and inspire an audience to take action or change

attitudes.

More definitions: http://www.americanrhetoric.com/rhetoricdefinitions.htm

Rhetorical Theory and Method

Rhetorical Theory: A body of thought about human symbol use.

Rhetorical Method: Using rhetorical theory to ask questions about “how communication constructs a specific understanding of the world.”

Applying rhetorical theory is humanistic inquiry.

Seeks to explain: Agency of speakers Roles of symbols in the human

world Power of audience to co-construct

realityHumanistic, not scientific:

Not looking for objective truth—reality is not a distinct object to be “discovered”

Looking to understanding the meaning humans assign—reality is a product of humans interactively creating knowledge in context.

Or Is It?

Rhetorical theory is a lens for looking at legal communication

as a rhetorical situation.

Click icon to add pictureA speaker uses symbols of the law to persuade an audience to take action. The action of the audience is constrained. All of this takes place in a context.

[Legal] Context

and Constraints

Speaker

Symbol (of Law)

Audience

Res

pond

ing

to N

eed Inducing A

ction

Need

Production (Instructive)

Reception (Instructive, Critical)

Construct messages more consciously.

Write better.Speak better.Teach better.

Receive messages more consciously.

As a lawyer: read/listen better.

As a scholar/ “special citizen”: critically assess legal messages.

Two Main Areas for Using Rhetorical Theory and Method to Analyze Legal Communication

Why Rhetorical Theory for Legal Communication?

Improve teaching and develop expertise. production and reception of legal communication. understanding of how legal language works by

standing “outside” the law to make better sense of law as language.

Examine ethics of legal communication as well as effectiveness.

Create

The legal community we want by theorizing the practice of law.

Applying Rhetorical Theory: The Researcher’s Choices

What will be the focus of study? The speaker, audience, patterns, strategies?

What is the perspective (method) the scholar will take?

What is the judgment the scholar wishes to make (descriptive, interpretive, evaluative)?

What kind of insight will be gained from the study?

Rhetorical Theory Is Applied Through Methodological Perspectives

NeoaristotelianMetaphorNarrativeFantasy ThemeDramatisticGenre

IdeographicIdeologicalGenerativeFeministSociologicalSocial Movement

Generally Method

Looking for how symbols “hang together”

“What goes with what”

Key symbols Frequency Intensity

Associational Clusters Proximity Cause/effect Connectedness Opposing terms

Dramatism: Cluster Analysis

Action is motivated. Language is symbolic action. Symbol choices reveal motivation.

The idea The Pentad

Symbolic structures have five interacting elements.

Meaning changes depending on the relationship between those elements.

Pentad allows systematic exam of the “strategic moments” in symbol use.

Act

Attitude

Agent

Agency

Scene

Purpose

Dramatism: Pentadic Analysis

Scene Determines Act Act Defines Agent

At a little after the restaurant’s closing time, Ms. Jones found herself alone in an unlit alley. That was when Mr. Smith rushed toward Ms. Jones from an area obscured by empty liquor crates.

While walking home after a late dinner at a local restaurant, Mr. Smith saw Ms. Jones, a tenant in his apartment building, and he attempted to escort her home.

Pentadic Ratios

Generally Metaphor Parts

The way in which we know our reality through language.

An argument for a particular view of the world.

The “vehicle” frames the “tenor.”

Metaphor Analysis

Tenor: AbortionVehicle: Terrorism

http://flowtv.org/2013/01/what%E2%80%99s-in-a-metaphor-abortion-rhetoric/

Law is Rhetoric

Julie A. OseidUniversity of St. Thomas School of LawMinneapolis, [email protected]

My knowledge about rhetoric

Abraham Lincoln - brevity

Kristen Tiscione

Thomas Jefferson - metaphor

Aristotle

Michael Smith and Linda Berger

James Madison - rigor

Ulysses Grant - clarity

Kirsten Davis

Teddy Roosevelt - zeal

Judges

The FourJames Boyd White

Rhetoric and Teaching

I (and maybe you, too?) was a rhetoric scholar and teacher and didn’t really realize it . . .