key indicator-1.4 feedback system€¦ · 3. the relation of curriculum to real life was rated very...

KEY INDICATOR-1.4 FEEDBACK SYSTEM

1.4.1 Structured feedback received for design and review of syllabus yearwise from-

1.Students-

FEEDBACK ON CURRICULUM (SCIENCE UNDERGRADUATE, 2014-15)

1. Quality of the curriculum was considered very good by 31.25%, Good by 42.42% and satisfactory by

24.24%.

2. All most all the students consider that curriculum is sufficient.

3. The relation of curriculum to real life was rated very good by 15.15%, good by 45.45% and satisfactory

by 33.3%.

4. Curriculum was considered valuable by all the students.

5. Availability of resources regarding curriculum in library was considered good by 18.18% of the

student’s only 36.36% students are satisfied and about 36.36% are not satisfied.

6. Curriculum was considered beneficial by 87% and not beneficial by 12.12%

7. Curriculum was found easy by 24.24%, moderate by 54.54%, Tough by 18.18% and very tough by

3.03%.

8. 21.21% students marked that 80-100% syllabus was completed 54.54% students marked that at least

70-80% syllabus was completed. According to 18.18% students, 55.70% syllabus was completed and

9.09% students marked it as below 55%.

9. Library and other facility was rated not sufficient by 48.48% students, sufficient by 30.30% and

21.21% of students are not satisfied.\

SUGGESTION

1. Library resources to be strengthen.

2. Syllabus completion shall be monitored.

ACTION TAKEN

1. Enhancement in number of books in departmental library.

2. Frequent review by head of the departments.

Feedback on Curriculum (2015-16)

(Under Graduate)

Quality of curriculum was considered very good by 32% of the students, good by 39%,

satisfactory by 26% and only 3% students are not satisfied.

70% of the students rated sufficient by the students. 30% have rated satisfactory.

54% students have marked that curriculum is related to real life and has application part 46%

students have marked satisfactory.

Curriculum is considered valuable by almost all the students.

Availability of resources related to curriculum was rated good by 38% of the students, 28%

students rated satisfactory and 13% students are not satisfied with the resource availability.

Curriculum was found beneficial by 72% of the students.

Curriculum was considered easy by 18% of the students, moderate by 54%, tough by 6% of

the students and 22% considered it very tough.

Only 12% of the students marked that 80-100% syllabus was completed, 36% marked 70-

80%, 23% marked 55-70% and 29% marked that less than 55% syllabus was completed.

Library resources was found sufficient by 43% of the students, not sufficient by 34%, very

less by 23% of the students.

Suggestions

Library need to strengthen.

Course completion should be monitored.

Contents should be generalize.

Actions taken

Expansion of reading room, issue two books, open access, number of books enhanced.


(Undergraduate Science)

Quality of curriculum was considered very good by 35% and good by 34%, satisfactory by

26% and not satisfactory by 5%.

Curriculum was considered sufficient by 57% of the students good by 28%, satisfactory by

11% and not satisfactory by 4%.

Relation of syllabus with real life was rated very good by 42%, Good by 42% satisfactory by

14% and not satisfactory 2%.

Curriculum was considered valuable by 84% of the students and 16% of the students are not

satisfied.

Availability of other resources was rated very good by 85% of the students.

Curriculum was considered beneficial by 84% of the students, 16% of the students are not

satisfied.

Curriculum was considered easy by 28%, moderate by 42%, tough by 28% and very tough

by 2%.

According to 14% of the students 80-100% syllabus was completed, 70-80% was marked by

71% of the students, 55-70% was marked by 14% and less than 55% by 1% of the students.

Library resources regarding curriculum was rated sufficient by 85% of the students,

insufficient by 16%.

Suggestions

Content should be made easy by teachers by having their explanation skills.

Action Taken

Teachers are encouraged for refresher and short term causes.


(Undergraduate Science)

The clarity and relatedness of the materials regarding curriculum was considered very good

by 57% of the students & good by 42% of the students.

Efforts done as per the need of students was considered good by 57% and satisfactory by

42% of students.

Availability of required resources for learning was easily obtained by 42% of the student's,

with difficulty by 57% of the students.

Teachers preparation for the clays was considered very good by 16% of the students,

satisfactory by 28%, not satisfactory by 56% of the students.

15% students consider that teachers are always effective in explaining the concept, rated

sometimes by 14%, moderate by 70% of the students.

71% students marked that teachers always encourage them to attend class, sometimes by

28% of the students.

57% of the students marked that group discussion method was used and 42% students

considered questioning skill.

Teachers are considered very effective in counseling by 50% of the students, sometime

effective by 16%, moderate by 33% and marked never by 16%.

Teachers behaviour was considered cordial by 65%, sometimes get angry by 7%.

Internal evaluation was considered always fair by 75%, sometimes unfair by 14%, always

unfair by 1% and sometimes fair by 10% of the students.

Suggestions

Learning resources to be made assessable to students.

participatory method of learning should be adopted.

EDUCATION

B.Ed (15-16)

Curriculum is considered sufficient by 44.44% only.

Only 41.11% of students confident that Curriculum is related to day to day life.

Availability of other resources related to Curriculum is found satisfactory by 21.11% only.

Curriculum is found sufficient by 76.67% of the students.

71.11% students consider Curriculum as interesting.

About 70% of the Curriculum was completed in the session.

Availability of resources related to Curriculum is not sufficient in the library.

SUGGESTION-

-Library to be enriched, availability of e- books in the library is to be ensured.

-Curriculum should be updated.

PG (M.Ed) CURRICULUM

Only 27.78% student consider curriculum as related to daily life. Only 44.44% students consider that

curriculum is sufficient. Availability of other resources was not found satisfactory by students. About

88.89% students are not satisfied with the resources available. Curriculum was completed less than 55%

(72.72% students are not satisfied) 50% of the students consider curriculum as tough, only 61.11% students

consider curriculum as beneficial.

Non availability of books as per new syllabus.

SUGGESTIONS

At least two days in a week should be allotted for book issue .

Two books should be issued.

Number of books to be enhanced in central and departmental libraries.

ARTS CURRICULUM (UG LEVEL)

Content of the curriculum was rated good by 61% of the students.

About 51% to 75% of the students consider curriculum as sufficient.

About 45% of the student consider curriculum that it is related to day to day life.

Curriculum is beneficial for the student 76% students are satisfied.

Curriculum was consider easy by only 52% of the students.

Curriculum was not completed fully, only 47% of the students consider that curriculum is covered 70-

80%.

SUGGESTION

Library need to be enriched with resources related to curriculum.

Emphasis should be given on cause completion.

Application part to be added in curriculum.

Quality enhancement in the content of syllabus.

Adoption of student centric method for clearing the concepts.

ACTION TAKEN

Syllabus was updated at PG level.

SCIENCE (M.SC) POST GRADUATE

YEAR 2014-2015

CURRICULUM- SCIENCE

About 60% of post graduate students consider that curriculum is related to real life and is valuable.

80% of the students are satisfied with the availability of other resources related to curriculum.

About 70% of the students consider curriculum as interesting.

Curriculum is found beneficial by 60% of the students only 5% are not satisfied.

About 10% students consider curriculum easy to understand only 70% consider it tough other 10%

consider it very tough.

About 60% of the student consider that about 80 to 100% syllabus was completed and 40% consider that

about 70-80% syllabus was covered.

Library resources was found sufficient by 70% of the students 30% students are not satisfied.

SUGGESTIONS

Efforts should be made for 100% syllabus completion during the session.

Library resources to be enriched.

Application contents should be more.

ACTION TAKEN

Books have been added in central and PG departmental libraries.

Teachers are motivated for syllabus completion and are regularly monitored by heads of the department.

Teachers were asked to ensure participation of students in classroom teaching.

CURRICULUM

2015-2016PG (SCIENCE)

Quality of syllabus was found excellent by 64% of the students.

About 84% students are satisfied with the syllabus completion.

About 60% students feels that curriculum is related to real life or having application in day to day life and

32% consider it excellent. 8% student are satisfied.

Additional sources regarding curriculum was found satisfactory by 95% of the students.

92% students consider curriculum as beneficial.

Curriculum was considered easy by 88% of the students.

Only 24% of the students consider that 80.10% of the syllabus was covered and about 40% of the students

feels that 70-80% syllabus was covered. According to 36% students 55-70% of syllabus was completed.

About 72% of the students rated availability of books in library as good.

SUGGESTIONS

Efforts should be made for 100%, completion of syllabus.

Library should be more enriched as per the syllabus.

ACTION TAKEN

More book added in central and per library.

Extra classes taken by staff for syllabus completion.

CURRICULUM

PG (SCIENCE) 2016-2017

Quality of the curriculum was considered good by 100% of the students.

83% of the students rated syllabus as sufficient.

Only 50% of the students found that curriculum is related to life and is applicable in day to day life.

Availability of other resources was rated very good and good by 66% and 33% respectively.

Syllabus was found to be interesting and very good by 83% of the students.

Syllabus was considered beneficial by 66% of the students.

82% students found syllabus interesting. Syllabus was considered completed by about 80-100%, by 33%

students only. 50% of students have marked that 70-80% of the syllabus was completed and 55-70% by

17% of the students.

83% students have marked availability of books in the library as good. 16% students are not satisfied with

the library resources.

SUGGESTION

Library resources to be enriched. Availability of e-resources in the library to be ensured.

Application part of the curriculum should be given more emphasis by the teacher.

Students should be made aware about the benefits of the syllabus.

ACTION TAKEN

Library automation is in process.

FEEDBACK ON CURRICULUM (B.Lib)

1. The quality of curriculum was considered very good by 28.57% and good by 21.42% and satisfactory

by 50% of the students.

2. Curriculum was considered sufficient by 70% of the students 30% students are satisfied.

3. Curriculum relation with real life was rated very good by 7.14% students, good by 71.42%, satisfactory

by 7.14% and 14.28% students are not satisfied.

4. Value of Curriculum is rated very good by 35.715, good by 42.85% and satisfactory by 21.42% of the

students.

5. Availability of addition resources in library was rated very good by 7.14%, good by 42.85% and

satisfactory by 21.42% and 28.57 are not satisfied.

6. Curriculum is considered beneficial by 100% of the students.

7. Curriculum was found easy by 7.14%, moderate by 71.42% and tough by 21.42%.

8. 64.28% students considered that less than 55% of the curriculum content was taught in the class.

According to 28.57% students, 55 to 77% syllabus was completed and only 7.14% rate syllabus

completion up to 80-100%.

SUGGESTION

1. Emphasis should be given on syllabus completion.

2. Library resources to be enhanced.

3. The content should be simplified by the teachers by adopting student’s centric methods.

4. Application part of the syllabus should be dealt in the class.

ACTION TAKEN

1. Teachers are instructed for syllabus completion.

2. Availability of e-books in library.

FEEDBACK ON CURRICULUM (COMMERCE)

1. Quality of curriculum was rated very good by 67% of the students and good by 17% and satisfactory

by 16% of the students.

2. Curriculum was considered sufficient by almost all the students.

3. The relation of the curriculum with real life was rated very good by 33% students, good by 33% and

34% students are satisfied with it.

4. Curriculum was considered valuable by almost all the students.

5. Availability of resources related to curriculum was rated very good by 67% and good by 33% of the

students.

KALYAN P.G. COLLEGE SECTOR-7, BHILAI NAGAR (C.G.)

PARENT’S FEEDBACK ON CURRICULUM

2012-13

S.N. QUESTIONS OPINION TOTAL

Yes No

1. Did the syllabus

intellectually stimulate your

child.

42 12 54

2. Do you think that the

curriculum took your child’s

academic and professional

needs in to account .

48 06 54

3. Are you satisfied with the

leaning outcomes of the

objectives.

42 12 54

4. Do you satisfied with the

knowledge level of your

child.

35 19 54

5. Do you think syllabus is as

per modern trends.

47 07 54

6. Did the syllabus encourage

your child to go beyond it, to

consult other people/ other

resources.

45 09 54

7. Do you think syllabus need

revision.

28 26 54

8. Have you discussed the

relevance of the syllabus with

teachers .

15 39 54

9. Do you think syllabus is

making your child

technologically skilled.

46 08 54

10. Do you think syllabus would

provide job opportunities to

you child.

38 16 54

11. Do you think syllabus

inculcates human values in

your child .

52 02 54

OBSERVATION-

77.77% consider that syllabus intellectualy stimulates the child and 22.22% consider it’s not. 88.88 % feels

that curriculum is need based and fulfilled their academic and professional demand only 11.11% negate

this. 77.77 %parents are satisfied with the learning outcome and 22.22 % deny. 83.16% consider it as

according to modern trend and 13.33% consider it follows old pattern. 83.33 % marked that curriculum

encouraged their child to opt for other resources and only 16.66 % consider it needs improvement.58.33%

parents feel that curriculum doesnot require revision but 42 % demand syllabus revision. Only 27.77%

parents interacted with teachers on syllabus and 72.22 % doesn’t approach. 85.18 % are satisfied that their

children are getting technologically skilled. 70.37 % are assured that syllabus will provide job opportunity

and only 29 % are not sure.96 % parents think that syllabus inculcates human values and only 4 % deny it.

RECOMMENDATION-

1.Contents to be added in syllabus which intellectualy stimulates students.Standard of topics of projects

can be raised.

2.Frequent PTA meetings can be organized to enhance interaction of parents with teachers.

3.Parents should be acquainted with the program outcomes and learning outcomes.

4.Syllabus should be made more needful for students by inculcating modern trends.

ACTION TAKEN-

Syllabus revision was carried out at PG level in some programmes and at UG level unified syllabus is

followed.Dissertation,project work etc enhanced.



2013-14

S.N. QUESTINS OPINION TOTAL

Yes No

1. Did the syllabus


child.

32 13 45





36 09 45



objectives.

32 13 45



child.

35 10 45


per modern trends.

37 08 45




resources.

33 12 45


revision.

15 30 45



teachers .

10 35 45


making your child


36 09 45



you child.

30 15 45



your child .

40 05 45

OBSERVATION-

Syllabus intellectualy stimulates was observed by 71.11% and 28.88% denied.80% of the parents fond that

curriculum is need based. Educational objectives are not cleared to more than 28% of the parents.71.11%

fully understand and satisfied with the learning objectives.77.77% parents are satisfied with the knowledge

level of their children and 22.22% are not satisfied.Inculcation of modern trends in curriculum was

considered satisfactory by 82.22% of the parents.73.33% appreciated that their children search for other

resources.Most of the parents felt that syllabus should be revised.Only 22.22% parents interacted with

teachers.80% parents marked that curriculum helped their children in learning technology.Employability of

the syllabus was considerd satisfactory by 66.66% of the parents and 33.335 felt improvement

needed.88.88% parents feel that curriculum inculcates human values.

RECOMMENDATIONS-

1.Employability aspect should be more in syllabus.

2.Educational objectives should be made clear to parents in PTA.

ACTION TAKEN-

Short term skill based courses like Financial management and Communicative English offered.



2014-15


Yes No

1. Did the syllabus


child.

50 12 62





40 22 62



objectives.

52 10 62



child.

55 07 62


per modern trends.

45 17 62




resources.

42 20 62


revision.

52 10 62



teachers .

15 47 62


making your child


35 47 62



you child.

40 22 62



your child .

56 06 62

OBSERVATION-

80.64 % consider that syllabus intellectualy stimulates the child.Curriculum is considered need based and

fulfilled their academic and professional demand by 64.51% and 35.48%.parents are not satisfied. Learning

objectives was marked satisfactory by 83.87% of the parents.Parents are satisfied with the knowledge level

of their child.27.41% parents are not satisfied with the inclusion of modern trends in the curriculum.

Students approach towards other sources related to syllabus was considered satisfactory by 67.74%

parents and 32.25% felt that students should be more encouraged.Only 56.45% observed that students are

getting technicaly skilled and 43.54% parents are not satisfied. Syllabus is considered relevant for job by

the parents.90.32% parents felt that syllabus inculcates human values among students.

RECOMMENDATIONS-

1.Students should be made technicaly more skilled.

2.More course to be added to fulfill their needs.

ACTION TAKEN-

1.Tutorial for computer training.Power point presentation for PG students.ICT infrastructure provided.WIFI

campus,computer labs etc.

2.Special and elective papers added at PG level.



2015-16

S.N. QUESTINS OPINION TOTAL

Yes No

1. Did the syllabus


child.

40 12 52


curriculum took year child’s



42 10 52



objectives.

38 14 52



child.

46 06 52


per modern trends.

36 16 52




resources.

45 07 52


revision.

20 32 52



teachers .

12 40 52


making your child


36 16 52



you child.

48 04 52



your child .

44 08 52

OBSERVATION-

Syllabus intellectualy stimulates the child,76.92% parents have given consent on this and 23.07% were of

opinion that contents to be added to stimulate the students.Most of the parents agree that curriculum is

need based and as per demand.73.07% parents are satisfied with the learning out comes of the objectives

and 26.92% are not clear with the objectives.Almost 88.46% parents are satisfied with the knowledge of

their children.69.23% parents think syllabus is as per modern trends and 30.76% negate it.Parents are

satisfied that their children are approaching other people and resources for their content.Parents need to

consult teachers regarding curriculum. Good percentage of parents think that their children are

technologicaly skilled.92.30% parents marked that curriculum is relevant for job and inculcates human

values.

RECOMMENDATIONS-

1.To achieve the learning outcomes more programmes,short term courses should be offered.

2.Parents should be frequently interacted to get their suggestions.

ACTION TAKEN-

1.Many programmes has been organized like Digital literacy,Career counseling,personality

development,Disaster management etc.

2.Parents are often consultated regarding academic problem of their children,any disciplinary case,medical

cases etc.



2016-17


Yes No

1. Did the syllabus


child.

40 20 60





35 25 60



objectives.

38 22 60



child.

50 10 60


per modern trends.

52 08 60




resources.

55 05 60


revision.

13 47 60



teachers .

20 40 60


making your child


52 08 60



you child.

54 06 60



your child .

57 03 60

OBSERVATIONS-

Approximately 66.66% teachers observed that syllabus intellectualy stimulates their children and it is need

based.About 63.63% parents are satisfied with the learning outcome and 36.66% are not clear about the

objectives. More that 83% parents are satisfied with the knowledge level of their children.86.66% parents

think that curriculum is as per modern trends and 91.66% are satisfied with the way students approach

other resources for their content.21.66% marked that syllabus should be revised. Most of the parents

have discussed the relevance of the curriculum with teachers.More than 86% parents think yhat syllabus is

making their children technically skilled.95% parents marked that syllabus inculcates human values.

RECOMMENDATIONS-

1.Changes to be inculcated in syllabus as per modern trends and to intellectualy stimulate child.

ACTION-

1.Syllabus revision done in most of the courses at PG level.In some programmes new syllabus adopted as

per change.


ALUMNI FEEDBACK ON CURRICULUM

2012-13

S.No. QUESTIONS OPINION TOTAL

YES

NO

1. Was the content easy to

understand .

72 12 84

2. Was the syllabus

enhanced your knowledge

84 --- 84

3. Does the syllabus created

any interest to pursue post

graduation/ Research.

76 08 84

4. Does the contents

involved application part?

65 19 84

5. Were the subjects

applicable in your

practical daily life

70 14 84

6. Were the subjects relevant

to your job and your

future aspiration.

60 24 84

7. Does the course help in

developing your

personality .

70 14 84

8. Easy access to prescribed

/ reference books

75 09 84

9. Educational objectives

were clear to you.

72 12 84

10. Was the syllabus skilled

based?

62 22 84

OBSERVATION-

More than 85% of the respondent sagreed that the current syllabi is easy to understand and

14.28% consider it tough.It gave them a clear picture of the purpose of the course,and the

syllabi also fulfilled their objectives after the completion of the course.They also felt that the

content of the syllabi had developed knowledge and interest in them. They also found that

the curriculum was useful at workplace.About 71.42% responded positively they felt it was

pleasantly challenging,and about 89.28% said that they had easy access to

prescribed/refrence books.Where as 73.80% respondent opined that the curriculum was

skilled based. About 83.33% marked that curriculum helped in the development of

personality.

RECOMMENDATIONS-

1.Application part in the syllabus should be increased.

2.Modern trends in the curriculum should be adopted which will aid in skill development.

3.Management courses started.



2013-14


YES

NO


understand .

50 15 65

2. Was the syllabus


58 07 65




54 11 65



60 05 65


applicable in your

practical daily life.

52 13 65



future aspiration.

62 03 65


developing your

personality .

58 07 65


/ reference books

40 25 65


were clear to you.

45 20 65


based?

48 17 65

OBSERVATION-

About 76.92% consider that syllabus was easy to understand and 23.07% found it

tough.More than 89% gained knowledge which is helpful to them.92.30% were satisfied

with the applied aspect of the syllabus.It was considered interesting to pusue post-

graduation/Research.Relevancy of the content for jobs was confirmed by 95.38% of the

students.89.23% marked that syllabus helped in developing personality.Only 61.53% feels

that it was easy to access refrence books and about 38.46% faced problem.Educational

objectives were clear to only 69.23% and 30.76 were not clear about the learning/educational

objectives.About 73.84% consider that syllabus is skilled based and 26.15% negates it.

RECOMMENDATIONS-

1.Educational objectives should be made clear to students.Teachers in their classrooms

should start the lecture by stating objectives and apprising students about the outcome.

2.Curriculum should be skilled based, more short term courses can be offered.

ACTION TAKEN-

1.Certain skilled based activities like computer literacy,Dissertatio,internship etc were added.

2.Three month course on Financial management and Communicative English was offered.



(2014-15)


YES

NO


understand .

52 20 72

2. Was the syllabus


66 06 72




65 07 72



57 15 72


applicable in your


58 14 72



future aspiration.

60 12 72


developing your

personality .

64 08 72


/ reference books

50 22 72


were clear to your.

55 17 72


based?

59 13 72

OBSERVATION-

Contents was considered easy by 72.22% and tough by 27.77% Syllabus was consider

knowledgeable by more than 91% About 90.27% considered that syllabus created

interest.79.16% were satisfied with the application part of the curriculum and 80.55%

marked that curriculum was applicable in their daily life.curriculum helped in the

development of the personality.Only 69.44% experienced that books were easily accessed

and 30.55% found difficulty.76.38% have clear understanding of educational objectives and

about 81.94% feels that curriculum is skill based.

RECOMMENDATION-

1.Library facility should be improved.Latest books should be added and should be accessible

to students.

2.Contents should be explained in simpler form.

ACTION TAKEN-

1.More books ,journals etc added in library.

2.Teachers were asked to give presentation in simpler forms by giving examples from day to

day life.



(2015-16)


YES

NO


understand .

42 13 55

2. Was the syllabus


50 09 55




42 13 55



44 11 55


applicable in your


46 09 55



future aspiration.

48 07 55


developing your

personality .

43 12 55


/ reference books

32 23 55


were clear to you.

39 16 55


based?

35 20 55

OBSERVATION-

About 90.90% found curriculum knowledgeable and easy to understand. More than 72%

consider that syllabus created interest in pursuing higher studies.80% were satisfied with the

application part and is applicable to practical life. Subjects taught were considered relevant

to job and future aspiration by87.27% More than 78% said that syllabus helped in

developing personality and 21.81% denied. Educational objectives were clear and syllabus

was considered skilled based by 63.63% only and 36. 36% said it need improvement.

RECOMMENDATION-

1. Students should be encouraged to pursue higher studies by making the contents interesting

and explain its relevance to employability.

2.Emphasis on skill based education.

ACTION TAKEN-

1.Many seminars,workshops,short term courses like self defence,Digital literacy,career

guidance etc.offered.

2. Two special paper added in Msc zoology.



2016-17


YES

NO


understand .

45 17 62

2. Was the syllabus


50 12 62




52 10 62



58 04 62


applicable in your

practical daily life

50 12 62



future aspiration.

47 15 62


developing your

personality .

56 06 62


/ reference books

42 20 62


were clear to you.

54 08 62


based?

56 06 62

OBSERVATION-

More than 80% considered that curriculum motivated them to pursue higher studies and

72.58% found the syllabus easy and knowledgeable.About 93.54% marked that curriculum

has applied part which is useful in day today life.75.80% were satisfied with the relevancy of

the curriculum and 24.19% indicated improvement to be made.Curriculum helped in the

development of personality.Library was not found accessible by 32.25% and accessible by

67.74% Educational objectives were clear to 87% and syllabus was considered skilled based

by 90.32%

RECOMMENDATION-

1.Library should be made more accessible to the students.

2.Contents should be made easy to students.

ACTION TAKEN-

1.Digitilization of the library in process.e books,journals will be made available.

2.ICT enabled teaching which helps in better presentation of the contents.

Teachers Feedback on Curriculum

Year 2013-2014

S.No Name of Teachers Obtain Total Grade Remarks

Environment

1. Dr. Ranjana Sharma 46 85 Good

Library (B.Lib)

2. Mrs. Manjula Shukla 68 85 Excellent

3. Mrs. Alka Verma 68 85 Excellent

Zoology

4. Dr. Shipra Sinha 75 85 Excellent

5. Mrs. Akhila Satish 75 85 Excellent

Commerce

6. Dr. N.S. Baghel 80 85 Excellent

7. Dr. Salim Aquil 58 85 Very Good

8. Dr. Ravish Soni 67 85 Excellent

9. Dr. H.K. Kashyap 67 85 Excellent

10. Dr. Kalpana Trivedi 41 85 Poor

11. Amit Agrawal 58 85 Very Good

12. Mr. Shivanand Chaubey 54 85 Very Good

13. Yogesh Ramteke 64 85 Excellent

Botany

14. J.K. Tiwari 66 85 Excellent

15. Dr. Gunwant Chandrol 68 85 Excellent

Physics

16. Y.P. Patel 78 85 Excellent

17. Nitesh Gupta 51 85 Very Good

B.ed.

18. Dr. S. Purkar 77 85 Excellent

19. Dr. Shipra Babbar 70 85 Excellent

20. Dr. Rama Yadav 71 85 Excellent

21. Dr. Shabana 59 85 Very Good

22. Dr. K. Nagmani 40 85 Poor

23. Smt. Banita Sinha 75 85 Excellent

24. Anirban Choudhary 80 85 Excellent

Mathematics

25. Dr. G. K. Goswami 77 85 Excellent

Computer Science

26. Mr. Vijay Verma

69 85 Excellent

Bio-Chemistry

27. Dr. D.N. Sharma 50 85 Good

English

28. Anurag Panday 49 85 Good

29. Ekta Bisht 56 85 Very Good

Economics

30. Dr. Lakhan choudhary 73 85 Excellent

Political Science

31. Dr.rajendra thakur 73 85 Excellent

Sociology

32. J.L.Sonbhadra 74 85 Excellent

33. Dr.K.N.Dinesh 64 85 Excellent

History

34. Dr.N.S.Patel 76 85 Excellent

Hindi

35. Dr.Anjan 50 85 Good

36. Ashok Tiwari 54 85 Very Good


Year 2014-2015


Environment


Library Science



Zoology



Commerce


7. Dr. Salim Aquil 74 85 Excellent


9. Dr. H.K. Kashyap 44 85 Good

10. Dr. Kalpana Trivedi 44 85 Good

11. Amit Agrawal 64 85 Excellent



Botany



16. Priyanka Sahu 70 85 Excellent

17. Bhavana 62 85 Very Good

18. Manmita Singh Rajput 68 85 Excellent

Physics


20. Neelam Shukla 81 85 Excellent


B.ed.


23. Dr. Chhaya Sonpipra 78 85 Excellent

24. Dr.Pushpalata Sharma 75 85 Excellent

25. Dr. Suman Lata Saxena 79 85 Excellent

26. Dr. Anita Shrivastav 74 85 Excellent

27. Dr. Kavita Verma 72 85 Excellent





32. Dr. Shipra Babbar 65 85 Very Good

33. Dr. Rama Yadav 68 85 Very Good

Mathematics


Computer Science

35. Mr. Vijay Verma 74 85 Excellent

Biotechnology

36. Shalini Balakrishnan 48 85 Good

Bio-Chemistry

37. Dr. D.N. Sharma 54 85 Very Good

Chemistry

38. Mrs.Lata jai 73 85 Excellent

English



Economics

41. Dr. Lakhan choudhary 73 85 Excellent

42. Dr. Santosh Jain 75 85 Excellent

Political Science


Sociology



History


47. R.K.Sahu 54 85 Very Good

Hindi

48. Dr.Firoza Jafar Ali 65 85 Excellent

49. Dr.Anjan 54 85 Very Good

50. Dr.Sudhir Sharma 76 85 Excellent



Year 2015-2016


Environment


Library Science



4. Mr. Amit Sahu 52 85 Very Good

Zoology



7. K.P. Paikara 67 85 Excellent

Commerce




11. Dr. Kalpana Trivedi 46 85 Good




15. Jitendra Singh 64 85 Excellent

Botany






Physics


22. Neelam Shukla 80 85 Excellent


Education


25. Dr. Chhaya Sonpipra 78 85 Excellent

26. Dr. Pushpalata Sharma 71 85 Excellent





31. Dr. Shabana 64 85 Excellent


33. Dr. Shipra Babbar 77 85 Excellent


Mathematics


36. Leena Dewangan 77 85 Excellent

Computer Science


38. Arpana Verma 65 85 Excellent

39. Jyoti Sahu 65 85 Excellent

Biotechnology

40. Soumya Khare 68 85 Very Good

41. Shalini Balakrishnan 59 85 Very Good

Biochemistry


English

43. Anurag Panday 49 85 Very Good


45. Kondamma 57 85 Very Good

Economics


47. Dr. Lakhan choudhary 62 85 Very Good

Political Science

48. Dr.Rajendra thakur 73 85 Excellent

Sociology



Chemistry

51. Mrs.Lata jai 74 85 Excellent

52. Aditi Banjare 66 85 Excellent

Histrory


54. R.K.Sahu 71 85 Excellent

Hindi





Year 2016-2017


Environment


Library Science


3. Mr. Amit Sahu 57 85 Very Good


Zoology



Commerce




10. Dr. Kalpana Trivedi 41 85 Poor




14. Jitendra Singh 64 85 Excellent

15. Dr. H.K. Kashyap 67 85 Excellent

Microbiology

16. Hempushpa Urwasha 57 85 Very Good

Botany






Physics


23. Nitesh Gupta 46 85 Good

24. Heena Verma 74 85 Excellent

25. Anubha Verma 70 85 Excellent

26. Ankit Chandrikapure

39 85 Poor

Education


28. Dr. Chhaya Sonpipre 79 85 Excellent

29. Dr. Pushpalata Sharma 72 85 Excellent









Mathematics


39. Leena Dewangan 78 85 Excellent

40. Mrs. Sapna Thakur 74 85 Excellent

41. Gajendra Kumar 72 85 Excellent

Computer Science & IT

42. Mrs. Pranali R. Hatwar 56 85 Very Good


44. Arpana Verma 70 85 Excellent

45. Pooja Sinha 70 85 Excellent

46. Geeteshwari Verma 58 85 Very Good

47. Khushwant Singh 68 85 Excellent

48. Jyoti Sahu 66 85 Excellent

Biotechnology

49. Soumya Khare 68 85 Excellent

50. Shalini Balakrishnan 54 85 Very Good

Biochemistry


English


53. Kondamma 57 85 Very Good

54. Monisha Choudhary 66 85 Excellent


Economics


57. Dr. Lakhan choudhary 61 85 Very Good

Political Science


Sociology



61. Umesh Kumar Vaidya

73 85 Excellent

Chemistry

62. Mrs,Lata jai 79 85 Excellent

63. S.Sree Vaidya 62 85 Very Good

64. Aditi Banjare

66 85 Excellent

Histrory


66. R.K.Sahu 71 85 Excellent

Hindi




70. Dr.Sudhir Sharma 80 85 Excellent

71. Mrs.Lata Markande 84 85 Excellent

72. Mrs.Poonam Sao 75 85 Excellent

73. Chandra Kumar Patel 58 85 Very Good

74. K.P. Paikara 65 85 Excellent

key indicator-1.4 feedback system€¦ · 3. the relation of curriculum to real life was rated very...

Documents