kevin burke apc

14
All content in this presentation is protected © 2008 American Power Conversion Corporation On-Demand Architecture for Network Critical Physical Infrastructure Power Delivery in Today’s Data Center Kevin P. Burke, P.E. Critical Systems Manager Southeast Region [email protected] 704-821-0524

Upload: melanie-brandt

Post on 12-May-2015

304 views

Category:

Business


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Kevin burke apc

All content in this presentation is protected – © 2008 American Power Conversion Corporation

On-Demand Architecture for

Network Critical Physical Infrastructure

Power Delivery in Today’s Data Center

Kevin P. Burke, P.E.

Critical Systems Manager – Southeast Region

[email protected]

704-821-0524

Page 2: Kevin burke apc

APC by Schneider Electric

Agenda

● Present State of Affairs, Glimpse of the Future for

Data Center Power Requirements.

● Efficiency Improvements and Path to Savings

● Higher Voltage Options for Data Center Distribution

Page 3: Kevin burke apc

APC by Schneider Electric

IT Changes and Mechanical/Electrical Load Impacts

Page 4: Kevin burke apc

APC by Schneider Electric

High Density Computing

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

Year

Per

Rac

k P

ow

er D

ensi

ty (

KW

)

Max per-rack IT Load

Data Center rated

rack power capacity

IT Loads are greatly exceeding rated capacity!

Page 5: Kevin burke apc

APC by Schneider Electric

Needs for the Future Now!

● Support for Higher Density Loads.

● High Density Zones

● kW per Rack vs Watts per Ft2

● Higher Overall Building Efficiency.

● Improved Efficiency of Every Aspect of Data Center

Power Consumption.

● Green Solutions.

● Reduced Environmental Impact

● Reduce – Recycle - Reuse

● Rapid Deployment and Relocation.

● Changing Face of Economy

• Mergers & Acquisitions

• Compaction, Consolidation

Page 6: Kevin burke apc

APC by Schneider Electric

A standardized way to specify density

Same 500 kW data center – but different “average

density” depending on how calculated:

120

746 watts/ft2

179 watts/ft2

119 watts/ft2

189 watts/ft2

Ambiguous

• Include access area around

racks?

• Include back-room area?

• Consider total mains power

consumption ?

Specifying

Density

Traditional

way

White paper

Page 7: Kevin burke apc

APC by Schneider Electric

A standardized way to specify density

Same 500 kW data center – but different “average

density” depending on how calculated:

746 watts/ft2

179 watts/ft2

119 watts/ft2

189 watts/ft2

5 kW/rack =

● Eliminates the ambiguities of watts/ft

2

● Allows different densities for different areas

of the data center

Ambiguous

• Include access area around

racks?

• Include back-room area?

• Consider total mains power

consumption ?

120

Total IT power

# of racks

Specifying

Density

A better way

Traditional

way

White paper

Page 8: Kevin burke apc

APC by Schneider Electric

High-density zone

● A “mini data center” with its own cooling

● Contributes no heat to rest of data center

● Works with existing room-based cooling

● Hot/cool air circulation localized within

the zone by short air paths and/or

containment

● Achieves optimal efficiency

1 Spread the load

2 Supplemental cooling

3 High-density zone

4 Whole room

Cooling strategies:

Page 9: Kevin burke apc

APC by Schneider Electric

High Efficiency UPS

● Most UPS Manufacturers

are Striving for Higher

Efficiencies in Standard

Designs Today.

● On-Line UPS modules

available with efficiencies

as high as 96% at 100%

Load.

● Flatter Efficiency Curves At

Lighter Loads.

● More “Right Sized”

Designs.

Page 10: Kevin burke apc

APC by Schneider Electric

Efficiency Savings through Scalability

● Parallel for capacity or

redundancy

● 4000 amps system bus ● 2 X 1600 kW Scalable UPS

● Average load of 40 – 60%

● UPS sized to ~ 80% of load

with an efficiency of around

97% ● At a loading of 1600 kW (50%

system load), each module can be

initially populated to 1000 kW.

● Each module, loaded to 80%, with

an efficiency of 97% will have

system kW losses of 49 kW.

● At a kWh rate of $0.07, 49 kW of

losses translates to $30,047 per

year.

6 points of efficiency improvement saves $66,839 per year in electrical costs

● Parallel for capacity or

redundancy

● 4000 amps system bus

● 4 X 800 kVA/720 kW UPS

● Average load of 40 – 60%

● UPS load at 50-55% has

Efficiency ranges from 91%

to 94% ● At a loading of 55%, a 2880 kW

system (1600 kW load), with an

efficiency of 91% will have kW

losses of 158 kW

● At a kWh rate of $0.07, 158 kW of

losses translates to $96,886 per

year

Page 11: Kevin burke apc

APC by Schneider Electric

UPS Load vs. Capacity

Day 1 Capacity for Day 1 Loads

Day 2 Capacity for Day 2 Loads Day 2 Capacity for Day 1 Loads

Page 12: Kevin burke apc

APC by Schneider Electric

Typical North American Data Center

Power Distribution

Standard Configuration Utilizes

PDUs to Transform UPS voltage to

Server Power Supply Voltages

480 VAC, 3 Phase, 3 W + G to

208Y/120 VAC.

Overall Rating of PDUs Can be 1.5

to 3 Times the System Rating.

Even the Best PDUs Have

Efficiency Losses Associated With

Them.

Weight and Footprint

Considerations in the Data Center

White Space.

Heat Losses Associated with XFMR

208Y/120 VAC. Five Conductors, A,

B, C, N, G, Higher Amperage

Page 13: Kevin burke apc

APC by Schneider Electric

Typical 400 VAC Data Center

Power Distribution

400 VAC Configuration Utilizes no

PDUs to Transform UPS voltage to

Server Power Supply Voltages

400Y/230 VAC, 3 Phase, 4 W + G

to Rack.

Distribution More Closely Sized to

the System Rating.

Single Autotransformer or 400 VAC

UPS System can be used.

Greatly Reduced Weight and

Footprint Considerations in the

Data Center White Space.

No or Reduced XFMR Heat Losses

400Y/230 VAC. Five Conductors, A,

B, C, N, G, Lower Amperage

Page 14: Kevin burke apc

APC by Schneider Electric

Questions?