keeping title i, part d, true to its purpose: planning and funding based on needs and outcomes john...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Keeping Title I, Part D, True to Its Purpose: Planning and Funding Based on Needs and Outcomes John McLaughlin, U.S. Department of Education and Nicholas](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022032605/56649e755503460f94b75b67/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Keeping Title I, Part D, True to Its Purpose: Planning and Funding Based on Needs and Outcomes
John McLaughlin, U.S. Department of Education and Nicholas Read, NDTAC
![Page 2: Keeping Title I, Part D, True to Its Purpose: Planning and Funding Based on Needs and Outcomes John McLaughlin, U.S. Department of Education and Nicholas](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022032605/56649e755503460f94b75b67/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Participants will better understand:
• The important differences between Subparts 1 and 2
• The differences between generating and allocating Part D funds
• The necessity of utilizing needs assessments and formal agreements
• Their roles as training and technical assistance (TA) providers, collaborators, and relationship builders 2
Objectives
![Page 3: Keeping Title I, Part D, True to Its Purpose: Planning and Funding Based on Needs and Outcomes John McLaughlin, U.S. Department of Education and Nicholas](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022032605/56649e755503460f94b75b67/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
• Subpart 1 is quite straightforward.
– State Plan
– “Supplement not supplant”
– Transition reservation
• Subpart 2 is far more open.
– Different/more complicated counting process
– No “supplement not supplant” clause
– Part A reservation3
Subpart 1 vs. Subpart 2
![Page 4: Keeping Title I, Part D, True to Its Purpose: Planning and Funding Based on Needs and Outcomes John McLaughlin, U.S. Department of Education and Nicholas](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022032605/56649e755503460f94b75b67/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
• Different eligibility requirements
• Different reporting requirements and timeframes
– Annual Child Count
– Consolidated State Performance Report (CSPR)
• The youth themselves are different.
4
Generating vs. Administering Funds
![Page 5: Keeping Title I, Part D, True to Its Purpose: Planning and Funding Based on Needs and Outcomes John McLaughlin, U.S. Department of Education and Nicholas](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022032605/56649e755503460f94b75b67/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Generating Funds
Getting Part D Dollars
![Page 6: Keeping Title I, Part D, True to Its Purpose: Planning and Funding Based on Needs and Outcomes John McLaughlin, U.S. Department of Education and Nicholas](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022032605/56649e755503460f94b75b67/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
• To ensure your State’s full share of Part D(and Part A, neglect) funds
– The pie has been baked, but they haven’t cut your slice yet.
• To increase your knowledge of populations and their needs
– Take note of large/unusual increases or decreases.
– Track where (locality) numbers are increasing/decreasing.
– Note changes in program (neglected, delinquent, or at-risk) populations.
• To pass Federal audit6
Why Get the Count Right?
![Page 7: Keeping Title I, Part D, True to Its Purpose: Planning and Funding Based on Needs and Outcomes John McLaughlin, U.S. Department of Education and Nicholas](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022032605/56649e755503460f94b75b67/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
• Translator
• Data reviewer and verifier
• Fund recipient
• Contractor
• Innovator
7
Your Roles in the Generating Process
![Page 8: Keeping Title I, Part D, True to Its Purpose: Planning and Funding Based on Needs and Outcomes John McLaughlin, U.S. Department of Education and Nicholas](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022032605/56649e755503460f94b75b67/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
• Use/adapt the Federal survey.
• Ensure agency, facility, and student eligibility.
– Note important differences between S1 and S2.
– Work through the “gray areas.”
• Get complete and accurate counts.
– Combat the reluctance of agencies/facilities.
– Provide ongoing training and TA.
– Institute verification processes.8
Annual Child Count
![Page 9: Keeping Title I, Part D, True to Its Purpose: Planning and Funding Based on Needs and Outcomes John McLaughlin, U.S. Department of Education and Nicholas](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022032605/56649e755503460f94b75b67/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Administering Funds
Allocating and Managing Part D Dollars
![Page 10: Keeping Title I, Part D, True to Its Purpose: Planning and Funding Based on Needs and Outcomes John McLaughlin, U.S. Department of Education and Nicholas](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022032605/56649e755503460f94b75b67/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
• To be more effective
– Foster better outcomes for youth.
– Meet Federal, State, and local requirements.
– Meet program, agency, and facility goals and mandates.
– Ensure future Federal program funding.
• To be more efficient
– Do more with less in times of financial struggle.
– Effectively administer Part D along with other responsibilities.
10
Why Plan Your Funding?
![Page 11: Keeping Title I, Part D, True to Its Purpose: Planning and Funding Based on Needs and Outcomes John McLaughlin, U.S. Department of Education and Nicholas](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022032605/56649e755503460f94b75b67/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
• Manager/coach
• Training and TA provider
• Monitor
• Data collector and analyzer
• Program improvement leader
11
Your Roles in the Funding Process
![Page 12: Keeping Title I, Part D, True to Its Purpose: Planning and Funding Based on Needs and Outcomes John McLaughlin, U.S. Department of Education and Nicholas](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022032605/56649e755503460f94b75b67/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
1. State Plans
2. Application development
a. Needs sensing
b. Formal agreements
3. Application review
a. “Use of funds” proposals
4. Fund allocation and TA
12
Fund Allocation Steps
![Page 13: Keeping Title I, Part D, True to Its Purpose: Planning and Funding Based on Needs and Outcomes John McLaughlin, U.S. Department of Education and Nicholas](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022032605/56649e755503460f94b75b67/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
• Read your State Plan! It is…
– The foundation of your Part D program
– An agreement with the USED
• Know when to change it, when these occur:
– New understandings of Part D
– Changes in populations and/or needs
– Reauthorization
13
Step 1: Know Your State Plan
![Page 14: Keeping Title I, Part D, True to Its Purpose: Planning and Funding Based on Needs and Outcomes John McLaughlin, U.S. Department of Education and Nicholas](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022032605/56649e755503460f94b75b67/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
The Part D application is like an RFP; the application:
• Provides the chance to shape State and local programs through:
– Meeting Federal requirements
– Providing additional guidelines and/or regulations
– Setting funding/serving priorities
• Offers the opportunity to provide more guidance now for fewer difficulties later, through:
– Asking for more in program narratives and budgets14
Step 2: Use the Application as a Tool
![Page 15: Keeping Title I, Part D, True to Its Purpose: Planning and Funding Based on Needs and Outcomes John McLaughlin, U.S. Department of Education and Nicholas](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022032605/56649e755503460f94b75b67/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Needs sensing and/or assessments:
• Can be conducted at the State, agency, and facility/program levels
• Can focus on a single interest area or a whole system or program
• Can be completed by:
1. Defining the purpose and scope
2. Establishing a planning team
3. Developing an agency/facility/program profile
4. Identifying desired data, availability, usability, and collection methods
5. Analyzing data, identifying needs, and setting priorities15
Step 2a: Focus Applications on Needs
![Page 16: Keeping Title I, Part D, True to Its Purpose: Planning and Funding Based on Needs and Outcomes John McLaughlin, U.S. Department of Education and Nicholas](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022032605/56649e755503460f94b75b67/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
• Educational offerings within facilities and programs
• Additional available services and supports
• Students’ demographics and their unique needs
• Academic and vocational outcomes
• Transitional/post-release outcomes
• Professional development offerings and needs
• Relationships and their quality
Where we are now. Where we need/want to be. How we can get there.
16
What a Needs Assessment Tells You
![Page 17: Keeping Title I, Part D, True to Its Purpose: Planning and Funding Based on Needs and Outcomes John McLaughlin, U.S. Department of Education and Nicholas](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022032605/56649e755503460f94b75b67/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
A formal agreement is:
• A contract between funder and provider.
– Keeps expectations clear and creates lines of accountability for services
• Required for local education agencies (LEAs) and facilities—a good idea for State agencies (SAs) and facilities.
As the SEA, consider including more specificity in the application.
17
Step 2b: Create Meaningful Formal Agreements
![Page 18: Keeping Title I, Part D, True to Its Purpose: Planning and Funding Based on Needs and Outcomes John McLaughlin, U.S. Department of Education and Nicholas](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022032605/56649e755503460f94b75b67/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Formal agreements inform funders…
• How the grantee will use funds—meeting all requirements and student/staff needs
• What students will be served
• What staff (if any) will be funded and their qualifications
• What materials and equipment will be used and their costs
• Any potential for blended/braided funding
• What types and frequency of data will be collected
• How data will be used for program improvement18
Step 2b: Create Meaningful Formal Agreements
![Page 19: Keeping Title I, Part D, True to Its Purpose: Planning and Funding Based on Needs and Outcomes John McLaughlin, U.S. Department of Education and Nicholas](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022032605/56649e755503460f94b75b67/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Formal agreements inform recipients…
• Purpose of the funds
• Application requirements
• Award amount
• Period of agreement and re-applying timelines
• Use of fund requirements and restrictions
• Data collection and reporting requirements
• Monitoring expectations
• Consequences for not complying with agreement19
Step 2b: Create Meaningful Formal Agreements
![Page 20: Keeping Title I, Part D, True to Its Purpose: Planning and Funding Based on Needs and Outcomes John McLaughlin, U.S. Department of Education and Nicholas](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022032605/56649e755503460f94b75b67/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
• Did I receive what I asked for?
– Initially prescriptive vs. open and optimistic
• Does what I received make sense?
– At the facility, agency, and State levels
– How does one program affect the others?
• Is the application focused on improvement?
– Does it take into account past outcomes?
– Does it address current needs?20
Step 3: Conduct Thorough Application Reviews
![Page 21: Keeping Title I, Part D, True to Its Purpose: Planning and Funding Based on Needs and Outcomes John McLaughlin, U.S. Department of Education and Nicholas](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022032605/56649e755503460f94b75b67/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
• Decide on allowable and appropriate uses.
– Use detailed decision rules.
– Start with musts, work through to shoulds.
• Remember Federal, State, and agency/program priorities and goals.
• Be strategic.
• Feel comfortable with the process and confident in your decisions.
21
Step 3a: Evaluate “Use of Funds” Proposals
![Page 22: Keeping Title I, Part D, True to Its Purpose: Planning and Funding Based on Needs and Outcomes John McLaughlin, U.S. Department of Education and Nicholas](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022032605/56649e755503460f94b75b67/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
• Funding can be formulaic or competitive/discretionary.
– Generating does not have to mean receiving.
– Hybrid funding models can be used.
• The SEA, SAs, and LEAs are more than just “pass throughs.” These agencies:
– Facilitate coordination and build relationships.
– Maintain ongoing knowledge of programs.
– Make course corrections along the way.
– Provide ongoing TA to foster better monitoring outcomes.22
Step 4: Allocations and Technical Assistance
![Page 23: Keeping Title I, Part D, True to Its Purpose: Planning and Funding Based on Needs and Outcomes John McLaughlin, U.S. Department of Education and Nicholas](https://reader030.vdocuments.mx/reader030/viewer/2022032605/56649e755503460f94b75b67/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Mini Sessions
• Implementing Institutionwide Projects, Anju Sidana and Greta Colombi
• Facility Accreditation, Dorothy Wodraska
• Coordination and Collaboration, John McLaughlin
Breakout Sessions
• Efficient and Effective Annual Count Processes, Stephanie Lampron and DeAngela Milligan
• Making Sound Use of Funds Decisions, Nicholas Read, Simon Gonsoulin and Jeff Breshears
Neglected or Delinquent Community Session23
Today’s Planning and Funding Sessions