keeping the same rules 2

8
Keeping The Same Rule ! by Mohammed Salem Awad Consultant Date of Issue : 05/03/2014

Upload: mohammed-hadi

Post on 31-Jul-2015

462 views

Category:

Business


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Keeping the same rules 2

Keeping The Same Rule ! by Mohammed Salem Awad

Consultant

Date of Issue : 05/03/2014

Page 2: Keeping the same rules 2

Keeping The Same Rule

By Mohammed Salem Awad

Consultant

One of the main factors for successes is good planning, especially when we plan for futures as to design

objectives and set targets, but the issue when we plan for targets from some raw data, that may have

concurrent results or figures as the case of AMS airport which is shown in the following table. Really to

set a concurrent figures to get the same target is a hard task, then how to solve this dilemma !!!

As in the following table:

+

+

+

Page 3: Keeping the same rules 2

Objective :

So, is it possible to keep the same rule for forecasting

figures? i.e to get target that reflects the long term data

base of 21 years and set that target to reflect the

seasonality models of short term data base – three years

period to get the same forecasting design figure provide

that all the addressed trend and seasonality models

fulfills the required constrains, to be a fair forecasting

for the following passengers data base of AMS airport -

i.e Europe – Intercontinental and O&D - Transfer and

Scheduled – Unscheduled as it reported in their reports.

Models

- Trend for 21 years Data Base ( 21 Data Set) – optimum case

- Seasonality Model for 3 years Data Base ( 36 Data Set) – optimum case

- Two seasonlity models for 3 years Data Base ( 72 Data Set ) – optimum case

Constrains

There many constrains that should be fulfill the analysis

1- R2 is greater than 80%

2- Signal Tracking is in the range of - 4 and + 4

3- The forecast trend of 2014, for 21 years data base is the landmark (targeting forecasting figure)

4- All the seasonality forecasting results, should fulfill the above statement.

5- So for forecast traffic passengers of 2014 – should be equal

Trend Forecast x

Europe

Intercontinental

x O&D

Transfer

x

Scheduled

Unscheduled

x

x 2 1

4 3

Page 4: Keeping the same rules 2

Trend Forecast:

Based on 21 data set (21 years data base from

1992- 2012)

By implement trend approach using the best of

line fit ( Power Function ) the results of fair

fitting are

R2 = 96.5 while Signal Tracking = ± 5.71

The Forecasting of 2014

= 54,203,771 Passengers

Max/Min Signal Tracking Analysis:

The aim of this analysis is to keep most of the

signal tracking values in constrain band ( -4 and +

4 ) maintaining high value of R2 .

The graph shows the residual values by yellow

color are out of the band for 21 set data base, which reached the highest extreme value by ± 5.71.

Mathematical Model:

The mathematical model is power function with

the following equation

Actual Data for 2013 ( 1-10 ) are not included as

the data of 2013 are not available ( Nov. and Dec).

Amsterdam

Airport Schiphol

1

Page 5: Keeping the same rules 2

Seasonality Model ( Short Term ) : Europe + Intercontinental =

Generally speaking the normal method to evaluate short range

data with seasonality impacts is AREMA Model, but in this analysis

we will try use the best of art technique that reflect two

parameters only, they are displacement and Rotational, our

approach is to find the line of fit that passing through

the year of accumulated forecasted figures of 12

months for 2014, and that reflects a minimum errors

and high relation factor ( R2 ) for both series ( Europe &

Intercontinental ) which satisfies the following relation

Europe + Intercontinental =

= 54,203,771 Passengers

2 x

x

Intercontinental Europe 2

Page 6: Keeping the same rules 2

Origin and Destination Transfer

Scheduled Unscheduled

3

4

Page 7: Keeping the same rules 2

Keeping The Same Rule

Final Results:

Forecasting Accuracy Matrix:

Forecasting Accuracy Matrix can be represented by four

regions i.e Fair , Mislead, Poor, and Unrelated, for our

cases :

only one case ( Transfer ) is FAIR as it is satisfied

the pre- request

constrains while most

of the other segments

are Mislead which

actually fairs results

that deny the mislead

issue for the following

reasons :

1

2

3

4

Page 8: Keeping the same rules 2

1- The Signal Tracking values are defined on both sides of the trend line so the issue of

displacement is not exist.

2- By visual inspection, the forecasted model is lay on the actual data.

Conclusions:

The study shows, that there is possibility to design our targets even though to have same

target, off course it hard task but it needs patience and time to deliver a fine results.

The rule of the signal tracking is to refine the final results and positioning the trend line in the

final direction of analysis.

Two methods can be used to get the forecasted figure of 2014 = = 54,203,771 Passengers

either in one step ( analysis ) based on 72 data set – optimum case which is applied.

Or in two steps ( two analysis ) one optimum and the other one is adjusted based on 36 data set

each.

All data segment are reported, and any researcher can compare the forecasted figure by the

actual data to evaluate the forecasting approach.

The study shows high accuracy.

Contact:

Mohammed Salem Awad

Consultant

Tel: 00 967 736255814

Email: [email protected]

www.slideshare.net/wings_of_wisdom