katigraha kc002 kop
DESCRIPTION
A Clinical evaluation of Kativasthi and Nirgundi Erandadi Kashaya in the management of Katigraha , Sarat .K. Babu, PG Studies in Kayachikitsa, A.L.N. Rao Memorial Ayurvedic Medical College and P. G. Centre, Koppa.TRANSCRIPT
BY Dr. SARAT. K. BABU
B.A.M.S. (R.G.U.H.S, Bangalore)
Dissertation submitted to
Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, Karnataka, Bangalore in partial fulfillment
of the requirements for the degree of “Ayurveda Vachaspati” [M.D.]
in
KAYACHIKITSA
GUIDE CO-GUIDE Dr. Taranikanta Mohanta M.D, Ph.D (Ayu) Jamnagar Prof. Dept. of Kayachikitsa A.L.N.R.M.A.M.C. Koppa
DEPARTMENT OF POST GRADUATE STUDIES IN KAYA CHIKITSA A.L.N.RAO MEMORIAL AYURVEDIC MEDICAL COLLEGE, KOPPA -
577126 CHIKMAGALUR DISTRICT, KARNATAKA, INDIA
MARCH - 2006
Dr. Rashmi Rekha Mishra M.D(Ayu), (U.U) Prof. Dept. of Kayachikitsa A.L.N.R.M.A.M.C. Koppa
A.L.N.Rao Memorial Ayurvedic Medical College, Koppa – 577126 Dist: Chikmagalur
Department of Post Graduate Studies in KAYA CHIKITSA
Declaration
I here by declare that this dissertation entitled “A Clinical evaluation of
Kativasthi and Nirgundi Erandadi Kashaya in the management of Katigraha”, is a
bonafide and genuine research work carried out by me under the guidance of
Dr.Tarani Kanta Mohanta Department of Post Graduate Studies in Kaya Chikitsa,
A.L.N. Rao Memorial Ayurvedic Medical College and P. G. Centre, Koppa.
Date:
Place: Koppa
Dr.Sarat .K. Babu P.G.Scholar,
Dept. of Kaya Chikitsa A.L.N. Rao Memorial Ayurvedic Medical College, Koppa – 577 126
A.L.N.Rao Memorial Ayurvedic Medical College, Koppa – 577126 Dist: Chikmagalur
Department of Post Graduate Studies in KAYA CHIKITSA
Certificate
This is to certify that the dissertation entitled “A Clinical evaluation of
Kativasthi and Nirgundi Erandadi Kashaya in the management of Katigraha” is a
bonafide research work done by Dr. Sarat .K. Babu in partial fulfillment of the
requirement for the degree of Ayurveda Vachaspati (M.D.) in Kaya Chikitsa, under
Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, Bangalore, Karnataka.
Date:
Place: Koppa
Guide:Dr. Tarani Kanta Mohanta
M.D. Ph. D (Ayu) Jamnagar Professor, P.G. Studies in Kaya Chikitsa A.L.N. Rao Memorial Ayurvedic Medical College, Koppa – 577 126
A.L.N.Rao Memorial Ayurvedic Medical College, Koppa – 577126 Dist: Chikmagalur
Department of Post Graduate Studies in KAYA CHIKITSA
Certificate
This is to certify that the dissertation entitled “A Clinical evaluation of
Kativasthi and Nirgundi Erandadi Kashaya in the management of Katigraha”is a
bonafide research work done by Dr. Sarat .K. Babu in partial fulfillment of the
requirement for the degree of Ayurveda Vachaspati (M.D.) in Kaya Chikitsa under
Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, Bangalore, Karnataka.
Date:
Place: Koppa
Co-Guide:Dr. Rashmi Rekha Mishra
M.D (Ayu), U.U Professor, P.G. Studies in Kaya Chikitsa A.L.N. Rao Memorial Ayurvedic Medical College, Koppa – 577 126
A.L.N.Rao Memorial Ayurvedic Medical College, Koppa – 577126 Dist: Chikmagalur
Department of Post Graduate Studies in KAYA CHIKITSA
Endorsement
This is to certify that the dissertation entitled “A Clinical evaluation of
Kativasthi and Nirgundi Erandadi Kashaya in the management of Katigraha” is a
bonafide research work done by Dr. Sarat .K. Babu under the guidance of Dr. Taranikanta Mohanta, Department of Post Graduate Studies in Kaya Chikitsa,
A.L.N. Rao Memorial Ayurvedic Medical College and P.G. Centre, Koppa.
Date:
Place: Koppa
Dr.Jagadeesh Kunjal M.D. (Ayu)
Principal, A.L.N.Rao Memorial Ayurvedic Medical College, Koppa –577126, Dist: Chikmagalur
COPYRIGHT
I here by declare that the Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences,
Karnataka shall have the rights to preserve, use and disseminate this
dissertation in print or electronic format for academic/research purpose.
Date:
Place: Koppa
Dr. Sarat .K. Babu
P.G.Scholar, Dept. of Kaya Chikitsa A.L.N. Rao Memorial Ayurvedic Medical College, Koppa – 577 126
© Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, Karnataka
INDEX Titles Page No.
INTRODUCTION 1-6
Chapter - I OBJECTIVES 7
Chapter - II REVIEW OF LITERATURE 8-95
A) Disease review 8-85
Historical review 8-19
Vyutpathi 20
Rachana 21-32
Nidana 33-44
Samprapti 45-51
Poorvaroopa 52
Roopa 53-67
Upashaya, Anupashaya, Sadhyaasadyata 68
Chikitsa 69-82
Pathya apathya 83-85
B) Drug Review 86-95
Chapter - III METHODOLOGY 96-116
A) Materials and Methods 96-103
B) Observations 104-116
Chapter - IV RESULTS 117-134
Chapter - V DISCUSSION 135-156
Chapter - VI CONCLUSION 157-158
SUMMARY 159-160
REFERENCES
BIBLIOGRAPHY
ANNEXURES
Tables
Sl.No: List of Tables Page
No:
1 Hetu of vatavyadhi and katigraha 36 - 42
2 Samprapti Ghatakas of Katigraha 51
3 Pathya - Apathya 83
4 Greenough and Fraser scoring method of pain 102-
103
5 Age wise distribution of 50 patients of Katigraha 104
6 Sex wise distribution of 50 patients of Katigraha 105
7 Religion wise distribution of 50 patients of Katigraha 106
8 Occupation wise distribution of 50 patients of Katigraha 107
9 Distribution of 50 patients of Katigraha according to nature of
occupation 108
10 Marital status wise distribution of 50 patients of Katigraha 109
11 Socioeconomic status wise distribution of 50 patients of
Katigraha
110
12 Dietary pattern of 50 patients of Katigraha 111
13 Family history of 50 patients of Katigraha 112
14 Distribution of 50 patients of Katigraha according to weight 113
15 General nidana observed in 50 patients of katigraha 114
16 Main symptoms observed in 50 patients of katigraha 115
17 Associated symptom observed in 50 patients of katigraha 116
18 Effect of trial drug combination on objective parameters
after treatment of 25 Katigraha patients
117
19 Effect of trial drug combination on objective parameters
after follow up of 25 katigraha patients
118
20 Effect of control drug on objective parameters after
treatment of 25 katigraha patients
120
21 Effect of control drug on objective parameters after follow
up of 25 katigraha patients
121
22 Effect of trial drug combination on subjective parameters
after treatment of 25 katigraha patients
123
23 Effect of Trial drug combination on subjective parameters after Follow up of 25 katigraha patients
124
24 Effect of control drug on subjective parameters after
treatment of 25 katigraha patients
125
25 Effect of control drug on subjective parameters after follow
up of 25 katigraha patients
126
26 Over all efficacy of Trial drug therapy after treatment on 25
Katigraha patients
127
27 Over all efficacy of Trial drug therapy after follow up on 25
Katigraha patients
127
28 Over all efficacy of control drug therapy after treatment on
25 Katigraha patients
128
29 Over all efficacy of control drug therapy after follow up on
25 Katigraha patients
128
30 Comparative effects of therapies on objective parameters
after treatment
129
31 Comparative effects of therapies on objective parameters
after follow up
130
32 Comparative effect of therapies on subjective parameters after treatment
131
33 Comparative effects of therapies on subjective parameters
after follow up
132
34 Comparative effect of over all therapies after treatment 133
35 Comparative effects of over all therapies after follow up 134
Charts and Graphs
Sl.No: List of Charts Page
No:
1 Schematic Representation of samprapti of Katigraha. 50
List of Graphs
1. Age wise distribution of 50 patients of Katigraha. 104
2. Sex wise distribution of 50 patients of Katigraha 105
3. Religion wise distribution of 50 patients of Katigraha 106
4. Occupation wise distribution of 50 patients of Katigraha 107
5. Distribution of 50 patients of Katigraha according to nature of
occupation 108
6. Marital status wise distribution of 50 patients of Katigraha 109
7. Socioeconomic status wise distribution of 50 patients of
Katigraha
110
8. Dietary pattern of 50 patients of Katigraha 111
9. Family history of 50 patients of Katigraha 112
10. Distribution of 50 patients of katigraha according to weight 113
11. General nidana observed in 50 patients of katigraha 114
12. Main symptoms observed in 50 patients of katigraha 115
13. Associated symptom observed in 50 patients of katigraha 116
14. Comparative effects of therapies on objective parameters after treatment
129
15. Comparative effect of therapies on objective parameters
after follow up
130
16. Comparative effects of therapies on subjective parameters after treatment
131
17. Comparative effects of therapies on subjective parameters
after follow up
133
18. Comparative effect of over all therapies after treatment 133
19. Comparative effects of over all therapies after follow up 134
ABBREVIATIONS
A.H.Chi. Ashtanga Hridaya Chikitsasthana.
A.H.Ni. Ashtanga Hridaya Nidanasthana.
A.H.Su Ashtanga Hridaya Suthrasthana.
Amar. Amarakosha.
A.S.Su. Ashtanga Sangraha Sutrasthana.
A.S.Chi. Ashtanga Sangraha Chikitsasthana.
BP Back Pain Reasons and Remedies
BR Bhaishajya Ratnavali
B.P.N. Bhava prakasha Nigantu
Ca.Sa.Chi. Charaka Samhita Chikitsasthana.
Ca.Sa.Ni. Charaka Samhita Nidanasthana.
Ca.Sa.Su. Charaka Samhita Suthrasthana.
Ca.Sa.Si Charaka Siddhi.
Ca.Sa. Vi Charaka samhita vimanasthana
Chau. Ana. Chaurasia Anatomy.
Dalh. Dalhana
Das. Sur. Clinical Surgery by S Das
G. N. Gadanigraha
H. Sa. Hareeta Samhita
Harrison’s. Harisson,s principle of Internal Medicine.
L.B.P.H.P Low back pain hand book
Med. Pharm. Essentials of medical pharmacology.
N.S. Nibandha Sangraha.
P V S. P.V.Sharma.Dravya guna vijnana
S.E.D. Sanskrit English Dictionary.
S.K.D. Sanskrit Kannada Dictionary.
S.E.D.M.W M Sanskrit English Dictionary Monier William.
Sha. Sa. Pra Sharangadhara samhita prathama khanda
Su.Sa.Chi. Sushruta Samhita Nidanasthana.
Su.Sa. Chi. Sushruta Samhita Chikisthana.
Su.Sa. Su. Sushruta Samhita Suthrasthana.
Su.Sa. Sh. Sushruta Samhita Shareerasthana.
Su.Sa. Ka Sushruta Samhita Uttaratantra.
Vg. S. Vangasena Samhita
Vach. Vachaspati
. Y.R Yoga Ratnakara
.
ABSTRACT
Locomotion is one of the prime necessities of every human being. Katigraha is
one of the vatavyadhi, which affects the normal function of the lower limb. Even
though this disease, not being a life threatening one, it hampers daily activity of the
person. It is a neurological as well as musculo-skeletal disorder, cardinal features
being restricted movements of the spine and pain in low back region.
OBJECTIVES
The objectives of the present study are-
To evaluate the therapeutic effect of combined application of Nirgundi
Erandadi kashaya and Kativasthi in bringing symptomatic relief in patients of
Katigraha.
To study the role of Nirgundi Erandadi kashaya and Kativasthi in obtaining
complete relief in patients of Katigraha and its comparison with effect of oral
administration of Diclofenac sodium tablets.
Detailed study of the action of drugs of both groups individually and in
combination.
Detailed study of the disease covering classical and modern literature.
Methodology:
Total 50 patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were randomly selected
for the study. The patients were grouped in to two.
* Trial group –
Number of patients – 25
Kativasthi – Katigrahantaka Taila
Duration – 21 days
Oral medicine – Nirgundi erandadi kashaya
Dose – 50 ml B.D. after food
Duration – 21 days
Control group –
Number of patients – 25
Oral medicine – Diclofenac sodium
Dose – 50 mg B.D. after food
Duration – 21 days
Interpretation and results:
At the end of treatment schedule of 21 days, the results were collected and
statistically analyzed. It was found that control group gave highly significant relief
(p<0.001) in the management of symptoms especially pain and tenderness and
signs based on various objective and subjective parameters when compared to trail
group. Further analysis was done after 21 days of follow up. Here the trial group
showed highly significant results (p<0.001) than the control group where even
recurrence of the condition was seen.
Conclusion:
The trial drug combination of Katibasti and Nirgundi Erandadi kashaya
showed high significance in decreasing pain, stiffness and tenderness, which
was noted completely after follow up.
Control drug therapy showed significant result in reducing pain and tenderness
soon after the treatment but recurrence of the condition was seen after the
follow up period. It had a mild result in decreasing the stiffness. Moreover, the
control drug Diclofenac sodium was reported to give various side effects like
gastric irritation on the course of the treatment.
On comparison of both groups after the follow up period, it is found that the
trial drug therapy was more efficient in relieving the signs and symptoms of
katigraha.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I am obliged to my beloved parents and family members for their constant efforts, encouragements
and inspirations through out the work.
On the completion of this thesis work, I extend my sincere gratitude to my revered Guide Dr.
Tarani Kanta Mohanta, M.D, PhD (Ayu), who was the vital and kinetic force of this thesis; with
out his initiation this piece of work would not have been accomplished in stipulated time.
I owe my sincere regards and boundless gratitude to Dr. Rashmi Rekha Mishra M.D (Ayu) my Co-
guide for her constant encouragement and valuable suggestions that inspired me and her vast
treasure of knowledge, which always fascinated me.
I am grateful to Sri. Aroor Ramesh Rao, President, A.L.N. Rao Memorial Ayurvedic Medical
College, Koppa for giving me an opportunity to do my post-graduate studies.
My immense thanks to Dr. Jagadish Kunjal, M.D (Ayu), Principal, A.L.N Rao Memorial
Ayurvedic Medical College, Koppa, for his help and support in completing this work
I am obliged to Dr. Lucas M.D (Ayu), FRAS (Lon), Dept. of Dravya guna for his motivational
inspiration and support.
My sincere gratitude to all my respected teachers in the Dept. of Kaya chikitsa; HOD Prof. P.K
Mishra, MD(Ayu), Dr. Narayana Sharma, M.D(Ayu) and Dr. C.B Singh, M.D(Ayu).
I owe a deep debt of gratitude to my uncle Dr K.B. Sudhikumar and my aunt Dr. Mini
Sudhikumar for their guidance, valuable suggestions and moral support, which kindled my inner
enthusiasm and lead me through out the study.
My special thanks to Padmashree Dr. K. Rajagopal D.A.M, M.B.B.S for his valuable piece of
suggestion, which became the base for my study.
I remain grateful forever to Dr.Shyamalan PhD and my senior Dr.Christy J.T for their complete
guidance in the statistical work.
I am obliged to the respected teachers of Dept. of Rasa shastra and Bhaishajya kalpana; Dr. D.K
Mishra, M.D (Ayu) and Dr. Galib, M.D (Ayu) for their guidance.
My earnest gratitude to the respected teachers of the faculty of Dravya guna; Dr. Sanjaya K.S,
M.D (Ayu) and Dr. Sreedhar, M.D (Ayu) for their extensive help in the study along with Dr. H.R
Pradeep, M.D (Ayu) and Dr. Sathish Sringeri, M.D (Ayu).
I am glad to express my sincere thanks to Dr. Banamali Das, Dept. of Kayachikitsa and Dr.
Rajesh Kumar, M.D (Ayu) from the Dept. of Shalakya.
I will always treasure the guidance and support given by Dr. Rammohan, Dr.Ramesh N.V, Dr.
Lalitha Bhasker, Dr. Sreenivas and Dr. Abhinetri Hegde; Consultant Physicians of Ayurvedic
college hospital for their support during various stages of my work.
No words can explain the gratitude to my friend Shwetha, for her continuous motivation, patient
hearing of my queries and valuable suggestions through out the course of my work.
I will be failing in my duties if I do not express my immense gratitude to my classmates Dr.
Vijayendra, Dr. Prathibha Hullur, Dr. Binu A, Dr.Prashanth B.K, Dr. Roshy, Dr.Vishwanath,
Dr. Krishnakishore, Dr. Sanjeev, Dr. Suja, Dr. Kavitha, and Dr.Pankaj.
It will be reprehensible if I do not extend my gratitude to my seniors Dr. Purushotham K.G, Dr.
Pradeep K.V, Dr. Anil P Varkey, Dr. Clarence, and Dr. Leeladhar for their support.
With immense pleasure, I extend my heart full thanks to my good friends Dr. Ratheesh, Dr. Guru
Prasad, Dr. Dayanand R.D, Dr. Harvin George, with out whose support this thesis work would
not have been complete.
My heart full thanks to my friend Dr. Prabeesh. K, Prabhakara Ayurveda Pharmacy, Kozhikode
for preparing and providing me the medicine for the study.
With amicable gratitude, I thank my friends Dr S. Sooraj, Dr Sreejith Sreekumar, Dr. Vivek
Sanker, and Dr. Saji Sridhar for being my pillars of support through out my study.
My thanks to Dr. Sachin, Dr. Harihara Prasad, Dr. Raghuram, Dr. Susheel Shetty for their
valuable suggestions and moral support.
My special thanks to all PG juniors, House surgeons and others for their constant support.
I would like to express my gratitude to Miss.Amrutha, and Mrs.Jyothsna for their sincere support
in lab investigations.
My sincere thanks to Mrs.Triveni, Miss.Manjula (Librarians), Mrs. Jyothi and other office staffs
and hospital staffs for all kinds of support.
I am grateful to all the patients who became a part of my study.
Finally, I thank all those who helped me directly or indirectly to complete this work and last but
not the least I will always cherish the love and consideration extended by my dear roommates and
colleagues Ravi,, James, Partha, Pradeep, Sandesh for being with me through out.
Date :
Place : Koppa Dr. Sarat .K. Babu
Introduction
INTRODUCTION
Ayurveda the science of life is the natural healing system of India, its tradition going
back to ancient times. Memorized by Brahma, this science was developed and put
forth in action by the great seers and sages who are indeed the gemstones of the great
Indian culture.
The day man appeared in this universe, ailment also emerged along with him. As he
tried to explore the nature, knowingly or unknowingly found something fruitful to his
body and mind from the core of land. Then he tried to analyze it and named it as
knowledge for life. However, this knowledge took long time to develop into a science,
as it had to escape from the fetters of mysticism imposed upon it by long held
fallacious notions on life and its various intricacies. That knowledge is named
Ayurveda; science of life as a whole and medical science in particular, gathered the
cognizance and flourished in centuries. Ayurveda originated as a part of Vedic
science that provides a comprehensive understanding of the entire universe of matter,
mind and consciousness. It reflects healing wisdom of the ancient Saraswati culture
that was one of the cradles of the world civilization. This exquisite piece of wisdom
was inscribed by our great visionaries gifting us the greatest chattels of this
everlasting science of healing- our classics. So it can be considered as a healing gift to
us from the enlightened vedic culture.
As new observations were added to total body of scientific knowledge, theories were
modified and fortified in the light of logical reasoning and based on these
observations it grew. This dynamic aspect of science is perhaps the most outstanding
attribute all science especially to a science of living.
Page:
1
Introduction
Acharya Caraka says,
“Pareekshaam abhiprashamsanti kushalaah” 1
A constant re-examination or re-evaluation of every theory or fact is therefore, the
very essence of science.
Vata, one among the tripod of human living being is said to be superior most
in all aspects; for every action or movement, strongest in its ability to produce
diseases and worst mortality. Diseases related to Vata are innumerable and
presentation of it is in the whole body. Even though a large number of symptoms
suggest the abnormality of Vata the cardinal symptom of vitiation of this Dosha is
pain which is known as Shula in Sanskrit. This pain is universally understood as a
marker of the disease and it is the most common symptom that makes a person to seek
the physician’s advice.
In a normal daily life, living without ambulation is almost impossible
for any human being, from the time immemorial to ultramodern life. The quote ‘A
man is as strong as his back’ clearly indicates the importance of back and of course it
is the most neglected part in the body. The most common disorder, which affects the
movement of leg particularly in most productive period of life, is low back pain.
Katigraha is one such condition caused by vitiated vayu characterized by pain and
stiffness in the katipradesha. Even though it is not mentioned as a separate disease in
bruhatrayees ample references are found in other texts like Gada Nigraha by Acharya
shodhala and Sharangadhara Samhita. Sharangadhara has included it under the vataja
nanatmaja vyadhis marking its importance.
This problem, that evidently has a favorable natural history even then it can be
remarkably disabling, has challenged health care providers. While, a small percentage
of patients with low back pain accounts for a disproportionate amount of medical and
Page:
2
Introduction
economic expenses, the medical system (both conventional as well as complimentary)
often is unable to identify them early. Indeed, patients at high risk for becoming
disabled often receive more diagnostic tests and less focus in medical management
leading to surgical condition as they persist in making complaints. Because such
problems, affects not only the social and economic position of the individual and his
family but also leads to draining of national resource due to work hours lost, resulting
into diminished production.
The importance of back pain in world is underscored by the following:
1) The annual societal cost of back pain in the United States is estimated to be
between $20 and $50 billion.
2) Back symptoms are the most common cause of disability in patients under 45
years of age.
3) 50% of working adults, in one survey, admitted to having a back injury each year
and
4) Approximately 1% of the U.S. population is chronically disabled because of back
pain.2
According to a survey, low back pain is extraordinarily common, and second
only to the common cold with a lifetime prevalence of 60 to 90% and an annual
incidence of 5%.3
As the medical science recognized the severity, a medicament that relieves the pain,
improves the functional ability, restore from functional disability and controls the
condition with cost effectiveness is the need of the century.
Sequential administration of the Snehana, Svedana, Basti, are lines of treatment of
vatavyadhi as expounded in the Ayurvedic literature.4 Apart from these procedures,
the Shamana line of treatment that includes oral administration of medicine is of
Page:
3
Introduction
utmost importance as the administration is very easy and also effective. Only few of
research works have been carried out in relation to the Shamana treatment. Other than
the therapies mentioned in the classics various other techniques have been developed
by experts later. Kativasthi is one such treatment prescribed for vatavyadhis especially
katigraha, which shows its excellent result in relieving pain and stiffness by its
simultaneous generation of Snehana and Swedana property. Many herbal
combinations are described in Ayurveda and their therapeutic effect in katigraha is yet
to be explored. The oil used, Katigrahantaka Taila, is one such product from the
expert traditional Ayurvedic practioners having an excellent vatahara property owing
to the qualities of the ingredients present. The oral medicine Nirgundi Erandadi
kashaya mentioned in Sahsrayoga too serves the above purpose.
By looking at the individual herbal constituents, it appears that this combination
should be very proficient in combating the Katigraha. However, the proof of the
pudding is in its eating. Therefore, the present research work is planned to evaluate
the relative merit of the trial drug therapy (Kativasthi with Katigrahantaka Taila and
oral administration of Nirgundi Erandadi kashaya) in comparison to Control drug
(Diclofenac Sodium), which is prescribed in regular practice, in the present day. In
this comparative clinical study, patients were selected, placed randomly under two
groups. One group received treatment with Trial drug combination and another with
Control drug.
Page:
4
Introduction
The present dissertation work entitled - “A Clinical Evaluation of Kativasthi and
Nirgundi Erandadi Kashaya in the Management of Katigraha”consists of following
parts -
* Review of literature
* Clinical study
* Discussion
* Conclusion and Summary
Review of literature comprises of two separate chapters.
. The first chapter is named disease review. The first part of it, where brief description
of the historical aspect of the illness from Vedic era to the present time is being
explored is entitled as Historical review.
The second part of it elaborates the general description of disease
Katigraha. The etymological derivation, etiology, anatomy, clinical manifestations,
pathogenesis, prognosis and general principle of treatment Katigraha/Lowback ache
are discussed here.
The composition of the drug compounds Katigrahantaka Taila and
Nirgundi Erandadi Kashaya is detailed in the second chapter entitled Drug review.
The properties of the individual herbs used in the preparation of the medicinal
compound in brief are also given here.
Clinical study is the topic of second part of the dissertation. The
materials and methods of the present work with complete description of the
assessment criteria are given here. The descriptive statistical analysis of the sample
taken for the study is methodically elaborated. The observations, results and their
statistical analysis are presented in order with tables and graphs.
Page:
5
Introduction
In the chapter entitled Discussion, the results obtained are critically
analyzed to unravel the truth of efficacy of the combination taken for the study. The
Conclusions drawn from the present clinical research work are detailed in the chapter
Summary and Conclusion.
This clinical study is a sincere effort to add newer combinations of Shamana
treatment with proved efficacy to the list already present. The treatment adopted here
may have some edge over the other combinations prescribed in routine practice, with
this hope; the present work is carried out. It is also hoped that this work will pave new
avenues for enthusiastic research workers to further advance in this field and find a
better cure for this lingering malady. With this noble intention, this work is presented.
Page:
6
Objectives
OBJECTIVES
The objectives of the present study are-
To evaluate the therapeutic effect of combined application of Nirgundi
Erandadi kashaya and Kativasthi in bringing symptomatic relief in patients of
Katigraha.
To study the role of Nirgundi Erandadi kashaya and Kativasthi in obtaining
complete relief in patients of Katigraha and its comparison with effect of oral
administration of Diclofenac sodium tablets.
Detailed study of the action of drugs of both groups individually and in
combination.
Detailed study of the disease covering classical and modern literature.
Hypothesis:
1. Null hypothesis - The combination of Kativasthi and Nirgundi Erandadi
Kashaya does not have any action in the treatment of katigraha.
2. Alternate hypothesis - The combination of Kativasthi and Nirgundi
Erandadi Kashaya have good results in the management of katigraha.
Page: 7
Disease Review
DISEASE REVIEW
HISTORICAL REVIEW:
The knowledge of historical background of any particular disease is essential for
tracking the origin and progressive development of that disease. Information
regarding the disease can be considered complete with the knowledge of its historical
background. Hence, an attempt has been made to trace the references regarding
Vatavyadhi in general and Katigraha in particular beginning right from the Vedic
Period. For the total coverage of historical aspect, it has been divided in to:
I. Vedic period
II. Upanishad and Purana period
III. Samhita period
IV. Sangraha period and others
I. Vedic period
The disorders, which impair the movement of hip and legs, are as old as the
existence of human being as walking is an inevitable function since the existence of
man on the earth to search for the food. Many disorders leading to impairment of
movements of legs are known since Vedic period.
In Vedas, Katigraha is not mentioned in any form. While in Atharva Veda the
word, ‘Vatakrita’ is mentioned. Here ‘Vatakrita’ word denotes Vatavyadhi.
Anukam, Anukyam are the words used in many occasions to denote spine or
back. The word Prushtha has been mentioned in many places in Rig Veda5 and Yajur
Veda6. In Atharva Veda, Vata is addressed not to leave the body but bear the limbs
until the old age7. Prayers saying “keep Ojus in Ooru spread in Jaghana and Prushtha,
which is having the capacity to straight and erect the foot and responsible for
unimpaired organs of the entire body” is also been found in Atharva Veda8.
Page: 8
Disease Review
Another hymn says, “Keep the thigh of the body 100 years, keep the prushtha
healthy for 100 years.9” In addition, the diseases are named involving spine etc. quote
from Atharva Veda says- “I have removed the distressful disease reached through
your legs, knees, pelvis and yoni to the spine from your Ushniha Nadi.10” Spine and
dorso-lumbar spine are named separately by the words Kikasa and Anukam
respectively.11
“Yakshma” a disease condition described in detail in Vedas said to
involve any part of the body including Prushtha, Ooru, Shroni, Asthi, and Majja12,
13,14. In Atharva Veda15 also the association of weakness of Majja and pain legs is
described.
Based on above Vedic descriptions it appears that many varieties of Vata
disorders were prevalent during Vedic period, which impaired the normal bodily
movements, especially those of spine.
II. Upanishad and Puraana period
Upanishads used the term Anukam for spine as similar to that of Vedas. There
are elaborate description of the functions and types of Vata, its locations, qualities etc.
•In Kenopanishad the description given for Vayu as one which is always in
motion and continuing efforts. 16
•Eeshopanishad also described it in a similar fashion.
•Candokyopanishad highlighted the Chala property of Vayu and described its
association with body and movements.17, 18
•Kathopanishad named the word Sushumna for spinal cord, which comes out
piercing the skull.19
Page: 9
Disease Review
•In Prashnopanishad the anatomy of the spinal cord and its functions are depicted.
According to it, Sushumna is one of the 101 Nadis going upwards. With the help
of this naadi the Udana Vayu moves to and fro from foot and legs to head. 20
Brahmasootra reveals the importance of Vyana Vata as the one that resides in
the joints and responsible for the movements of the joint. The circulation is
considered as the function of Samana.21
In Garuda Purana, health related subjects are described in details. A separate
chapter is available as Vatavyadhi Nidana.22
Paanini has mentioned Vata Kopa as well as Vata Shamana. He has given the
term Vaatiki for disorders of Vata. Sushumna has been described in Harsha
Charita. Sushumna comes out through the lower orifice of Mastishka according to
‘Shankara’ on ‘Taitareeya’.
III. Samhita Period
Caraka Samhita:
Caraka Samhita is the first and foremost treatise that elaborates Vata,
Vatavyadhi at full length. The role of Vata Dosha in health and disease is described in
the first chapter itself. He allotted major part of 12th chapter entitled Vatakalakaleeya
for the description of Vata, its normal functions and both intrinsic and extrinsic
factors for its aggravation. In 17th chapter Kiyantashiraseeya, the two modes of
morbidity of Vata i.e., Chaya and Prakopa as well as different courses of Doshas in
the pathogenesis of disease are described. He has mentioned shula as a symptom of
provoked vata.
In Maharogadhyaaya, the 20th chapter in Sootrasthana, where he enlists nanatmaja
vata vyadhi, though Kati graha has not been mentioned, other symptoms of spinal
disease like Prushtha graha, Trikagraha, pada shula , supti, , etc. are found.
Page: 10
Disease Review
As he has not given place for Vatavyadhi in Nidana Sthana, he stressed the
importance of Vata in 28th chapter of Chikitsa Sthana. He further described five
varieties of Vata and etiology of its morbidity along with its clinical features. The
description of morbidity of Vata included the different clinical manifestation
according to the site of involvement. The unique pathogenesis of vata vitiation due to
the obstruction to its passage or functioning is elucidated in full detail.
In addition, the elaborate description of treatment of imbalance of Vata in general,
and at specific sites and when the passage is obstructed in particular is also made in
the same context.
This chapter also includes the complete description of certain common Vatavyadhis in
regards its etiology, pathogenesis, general principles of treatment as well as treatment
in particular.
Different references related to Katigraha in charaka samhita :
Ø Prushtha graha, Trika graha is explained as nanatmaja vata vyaadhi23
Ø Kati sangraha as one of the swedya vyaadhi 24
Ø Prushtha, Kati graha as symptom of vrukkaja vidhradhi25
Ø Kati shula as a symptom in Gridhrasi26
Ø Vata vikara of Prushtha due to excess use of Katu rasa27
Ø Different types of pain in Kati and Prushtha in Vataja jwara28
Ø Jangha ooru sadana as Swedana atiyoga29
Ø Trika, Prushtha rogas as a lakshana of Gudagatha Vata30
Page: 11
Disease Review
Ø TrikaVedana as a lakshana of Pakvashayagata Vata31
Ø Kati Shula, Trika & Prushtha Shula lakshanas of Vataja Arshas32
Sushruta Samhita:
Anatomy was much advanced during Sushruta’s period. He has counted 300
bones and 24 prakaaras of joints in relation to the spine. In Sharira Sthana, Sushruta
has described the structure of Prushtha, Pada and its joints.. He clearly mentioned in
Marma Sharira that trauma on Kukundara Marma leads to sensory and motor loss of
lower limbs and leads to disability (Vaikalyata). In Siravyadha Sharira he described
the position, place and method of Siravyadhana in Vatavyadhi cases.
Sushruta has given much importance by allotting the first chapter of Nidana
Sthana itself for Vatavyadhis. He portrayed some allied conditions like Gridhrasi,
Khanja, Pangu, Kalayakhanja etc. but references for Katigraha are not found. In
Bhagna Nidana chapter he made many original observations pertaining to
Sandhimukta (dislocation or herniation) Kandabhagna (fracture). His description
pertaining to classification, clinical features, prognosis etc, of Sandhimukta suits for
lumbar disc prolapse which is responsible for majority of Low back ache and sciatica
cases.
Sushruta allotted two chapters in Chikitsa Sthaana for treatment for
Vatavyadhis. General therapies of Vata are in Vatavyadhi Adhyaya and the
subsequent chapter, which is named Mahavatavyadhi Chikitsa, is filled with specific
therapeutic measures to be adopted in Gridhrasi, Vatarakta, Pakshaghata etc. In
Chikitsa Sthaana, also he kept the Vata Vyadhi Chikitsa chapter subsequent to
Bhagna Chikitsa chapter, which reflects its relations. The therapies described in
Bhagna Chikitsa also useful in Katigraha cases especially of Abhighataja origin. He
Page: 12
Disease Review
described traction, manipulation etc, briefly to restore the dislocations which suits to
Katigraha cases also.
He described identical treatment for Gridhrasi, Khanja, Pangu, Vatakantaka,
Padadaha, Padaharsha, Dhamaneegata Vataroga etc, which is Siravyadha along with
general measures of Vataroga. He has mentioned the use of some oral drugs like
Shatdharana yoga, Lavana, Svedana, Nasya, external measures and suitable
environment etc. All these can be adopted in Katigraha also since it is a condition
produced by vitiated vata dosha. Nevertheless, no direct reference for this is found in
Sushruta Samhita.
However, unlike Caraka, Sushruta has not mentioned Kati shula as a symptom of
gridhrasi.
Different references related to Katigraha in Sushruta samhita:
Ø In Pakwashaya gata vata Acharya has included Trika Vedana as a symptom33
Ø Kati Shula is observed as a symptom in Vataja arshas34, vankshanotha vidhradhi35,
bhagna, and in seventh stage of Sarpavisha akshepa36.
Bhela Samhita:
Acharya Bhela has described 45 kasherukas in the Prushtha (back) and 15 in Greeva
(neck). Probably he has counted the discs along with the vertebrae. The description of
Vata its normal and morbid states in Bhela Samhita are almost analogous to Caraka
Samhita in many respects. He has classified Vata vyaadhi into two groups- Sarvanga
and Ekanga vata, all the pain dominating diseases of Kati and Prushtha being enlisted
in Ekanga vata roga. Bhela mentions two types of Prushtha diseases Upakshari and
Kshari.
Page: 13
Disease Review
Kati shula is observed as a complication of many diseases like vataja kasa. Mandagni
and impeded movement of vata are the main cause of Kati shula. While describing the
Yapana basti he has mentioned it will relieve the pain at Kati.
However, the description of Heenaanga (degeneration?) and Adhikaanga
(osteophytes?) with Vata Rogas is found interesting since they are the causes for Low
back ache.
In 24th chapter of Chikitsa Sthana some general and special measures of Vata hara
chikitsa along with Vatahara Tailas are discussed
Hareeta Samhita:
Hareeta described the etiological factors of Vata Prakopa very elaborately. He
has illustrated the Vata disorders classifying according to five varieties of Vata with
mentioning about 16 diseases for each type. He allotted separate chapters for
Aamavata and Gridhrasi Vata. He cited Prushthastambha and Oorusthambha also as
disorders of Vyana Vata
Kashyapa Samhita:
In Kashyapa Samhita there is no specific chapter for Vata Vyadhi Chikitsa.
However, the general aspects of Vata and its aetiopathogenesis are discussed in
Sutrasthana in similar lines as that of Charaka. Kashyapa observed Asthi and Majja as
sites of Vata which indicate the Prushtha as Vata Sthana the involvement of which
may lead to Katigraha.
According to him, Kati shula is one of the complication occuring due to dushprajata.
He has advised swedana as a treatment for it.
He elaborated the use of Sneha, Sveda, and Vasti. He described the use of Lashuna
elaborately indicating the use in Vatarogas in particular for both prevention and cure
allotting a separate chapter in Kalpa Sthana.
Page: 14
Disease Review
His description of therapies of Phakka Roga may be useful at the treatment of
severe Katigraha where the movements of limbs are hampered, particularly the
adaptation of Citraradha etc, in alleviating Vata and restoring the walk with the use of
Citraradha.
IV. Sangraha period and others
Ashtanga Sangraha and Hridaya:
Vruddha Vaagbhata illustrated Vata, its physiological and pathological states
correlating the views of both Caraka and Sushruta incorporating his original
observations in his work Ashtanga Sangraha.
He has specifically mentioned that the site of Vata at the lower part of the
body. He has made fundamental observations pertaining to the role of Sheeta and
Ushna Gunas in the etiopathogenesis of Vata resulting in to Chaya, Prakopa and
Prashama.
Vruddha Vagbhata has described the five varieties of Vata more elaborate to
facilitate their application in clinical purposes in Doshabhedeeya chapter of
Sutrasthana and Vata Vyadhi Nidana.
Vruddha Vagbhata has given place for Vata Vyadhis in both Nidana Sthana and
Chikitsa Sthana similar to Sushruta. In Nidana Sthana he detailed individual
etiological factors for vitiation and their clinical features for all the five varieties of
Vata in Vatarakta Nidana chapter.
Even though it is not mentioned specifically, the impaired functions in Katigraha like
Gati, Prasarana, Aakunchana, can be attributed to those by Vyana Vata as per the
citations of Vruddha Vagbhata. Apana Vata also moves in Shroni and Ooru as
connoted by him.
Page: 15
Disease Review
Both these texts have mentioned about Kati shula in the disease of provoked vata,
seated in pakwaasaya. 37
Kati toda and Kati bheda are mentioned as a poorva roopa of vata rakta.38 Sarvadhatu
avruta vata produces pain in Prushtha and shroni.
Arunadutta:
Arunadutta in his Sarvanga Sundari commentary on Ashtanga Hridaya defines
clearly that due to Vata in Kandara the pain is produced at the time of raising leg
straight and it restricts the movement of thigh. This is an important clinical test now a
day for the diagnosis of sciatica and low back ache known as Straight Leg Raising
Test.
Madhava Nidana:
Madhavakara described Vata Vyadhis in 4 chapters i.e., Vata Vyadhis,
Vatarakta, Oorusthambha and Aamavata, a pattern which had been adopted by many
of his subsequent authors.
He had described Vatavyadhis more elaborately incorporating all the symptoms
described by Charaka, Sushruta and Vagbhata.
He has given detailed description of shula. Vayu is said to be responsible for all types
of pain. Prushtha shula and trika shula are mentioned in the symptoms of vataja
shula. . Prushtha shula has been mentioned as the disease of vata kaphaja
predominance.
The symptom Kati shula manifests in the following diseases-
* Sangraha grahani39
* Vataja arsa40
* Vatanubandhi raktaarsa41
Page: 16
Disease Review
* Aamavata42
* Aanaha43
Gadanigraha:
Vaidya Shodhala had mentioned at the introduction of Vata Rogadhikara that
Vatavyadhis leads to all other disorders.
This is the only work where Katigraha is explained as a separate disease condition
along with the vatavyadhis. Vaidya Shodhala described Vatavyadhis in four separate
chapters i.e., Vatavyadhi, Vatarakta, Oorusthambha and Aamavata.
A clear description regarding the samprapti, lakshana of Katigraha is explained by the
author in the Kayachikitsa khanda, Vataroga adhikara.44 How ever, it is to be noted
that he has mentioned details of the disease only in the chikitsa adhyaya of
vatarogadhikara along with the treatment of all other vatavyadhis, details of which he
has mentioned in the nidana adhyaya.
In this text treatment part of Katigraha or Katisthambha has been explained at two
places
a) 2nd chapter Prayoga Khanda
b) 19th chapter of Kayachikitsa Khanda
He has described various formulations for Katishula and has specifically indicated
Trayodashanga guggulu for Katigraha.
In the Prayoga Khanda Tailadhikara he has mentioned:
• Chathurtha prasarani tailam and Molaka Tailam for Katisthambha45
• Trutheeya maha masha tailam for various ailments of Kati, Jangha and Janu.46
In addition, he has pointed out the necessity of Raktadushtihara therapies in Vatarogas
when the usual measures have failed to achieve the desired results.
Page: 17
Disease Review
Sharangdhara Samhita:
This is another treatise where Katigraha is mentioned as a vyadhi. The author has
mentioned Kati graha among the Nanatmaja vata Vyadhis in its Pradhama khanda 7th
chapter.47 Adhamalla in his commentary says that it is a Vedana vishesha (specific
type of pain) due to Sthambha (stiffness).
In addition, the author has mentioned various treatments for katigraha and Katishula
in detail. He has indicated Rasna Sapthakam Kashayam especially for Katigraha
and Eranda Sapthakam kashayam for various ailments of katipradesha.
He has also indicated Ajamodadyam choornam for Ruja in katipradesha.
Bhava Prakasha
In this book, Trika shula has been mentioned as a separate disease. He has
explained trika as a joining place of 2 bones and Prushtha vamsha. Pain in trika is
called trika shulam. In addition, various treatments like valukasweda, agnisweda and
trayodashanga guggulu have been advised in this.
Rasa Ratna Samuchaya
In this treatise of Vagbhata, Kati shula has been mentioned as an invariable symptom
in the context of Aamavata.
Yogaratnakara:
The author has introduced various terms to denote backache like Kati shula,
Kati vata and Kati pida in the asheeti vataroga chikitsa. In addition, he has advised
Erandataila prayoga, and preparations like eranda beeja payasa, Modaka with Taila,
ghruta, ardraka rasa etc. for such conditions.
Page: 18
Disease Review
Sahasrayogam:
It is compiled by an unknown author or authors containing description of
numerous preparations particularly used traditionally in Kerala. Abundant yogas for
Vata disorders, Gridhrasi and allied conditions can be found in this text. Prominent
among them are:
Sahacaradi Kashayam, Nirgundierandadi kashayam, Ashtavargam Kashayam,
Rasonadi Kashayam, Rasnairandadi Kashayam, Dhanvantaram Tailam, Avartita
Ksheerabala Tailam, Dhanyaamla Avagaha Svedam, Prabhanjanavimardanam
Tailam, Karpasasthyadi Tailam, Panchasneham, Narasimha Choornam etc.
Page: 19
Disease Review
VYUTPATHI
The word katigraha as it indicates is constituted by two words ‘kati’ and ‘graha’. The
word ‘kati’ is derived from the dhatu “kat + in” and it is considered as a ‘sharira
avayava vishesha’, a bodily part where the dress is tightened.48
The term ‘graha’ is derived from the dhatus ‘Adant-Churam-Atmam-Saka-Set’. The
term is explained as ‘Graho Grahanam’, by Durga das, which means to catch.
Kavikalpadruma has explained it as ‘aadane’, which means to collect or to catch.49
So from these two references it can be derived that the term Katigraha collectively
indicates a condition charecterised by a catch or stiffness in Katipradesha.
PARIBHASHA
The term katigraha is explained by acharya shodhala as a condition characterised by the
vitiated vayu either shuddha or with ama, taking ashraya in the katipradesha causing ruja and
stiffness in the area.
Sharangadhara has explained it as ‘katisthambhena vedana vishesha’ a condition marked by
pain and stiffness in the kati pradesha.50
PARYAAYA
The paryaayas of kati includes:
‘Shroni’ and
‘Kakudbha’, which are indicative if the waist or the pelvis.
Another paatanthara paryaaya is ‘Kankali’.51
Page: 20
Disease Review
RACHANA SHAREERA
In Katigraham the vitiated Vata get lodges at Katipradesha. Therefore, before going to
the disease aspects, the anatomy and physiology of Kati are to be under stood
properly. In classics we have scattered reference of anatomical and physiological
consideration of Kati. Here an attempt is made to enumerate those structures, which
are helpful in maintaining the stability of the joints.
In Ayurveda, Sandhis are mainly classified into two types; 52
1) Sthira Sandhi
2) Chala Sandhi
Again they are sub classified into eight types.53
1) Kora 5) Tunnasevani
2) Udookala 6) Vayasa tunda
3) Samudga 7) Mandala
4) Pratara 8) Shankhavarta
Acarya Sushruta- father of Surgery considered sandhi in kati under Chala Sandhi
and sub classified under Tunnasevini54.
Other factors, which are to be highlighted in understanding the Sandhi are-
Shleshaka Kapha
Among five variety of Kapha, Shleshaka Kapha resides in joints. It keeps the
joints firmly united, protects their articulation opposes their separation and
disunion55.
Page: 21
Disease Review
Shleshmadhara Kala
It is the fourth Kala, which is situated in all joints of living beings. As wheel
moves on well by lubricating the axis, joints also function properly if supported with
Kapha. This helps in lubrication of joints56.
Vyana Vata
Vata governs every movement in the body. Vyana Vata is one among the five
varieties of Vata, which resides at Hridaya and controls most of the motor functions.
The Gati or physical movement is also one of its functions.
Gayadasa commenting on Sushruta has quoted the wordings of an unknown
author as though the Vyana Vata is functioning all over the body it resides in the
Sandhi57.
Ahcarya Vagbhata states that Vata is located in the Asthi with relation to
'Ashrayashrayi Sambandha'. Generally, augmentation or diminution of Doshas would
be given similar effect on their respective Dhatus but in case of Vata it is opposite;
with increase in Vata, Asthi Kshaya occurs58.
Sushruta in Sharirasthana explains different structures of the human body.
Among them, structures coming under Katipradesha are listed below.
Snayu
Among nine hundred Snayus, sixty are present in Kati. It may be of Pratana
variety, which is found in all Sandhis.
Importance – As a boat consisting of planks becomes capable of carrying load of
passengers in river after it is tied properly with bundle of ropes, all joints in the body
are tied with many ligaments by which persons are capable of bearing load59.
Page: 22
Disease Review
Peshi
Those fleshy masses demarcated from each other are known as Peshi. They
are strong structures that help to maintain alignment of the joint60.
Sanghata
Assemblages of bones are fourteen. If trika is considered as shronikaanda
bhaga (lumbosacral joint and sacroiliac joint) one sanghata is being mentioned.61
ANATOMY OF LOW BACK
In this recent period, the allopathic science has developed rapidly. A better
understanding of diseases especially conditions like lumbar disc prolapse, lumbar
spondylosis, lumbar canal stenosis which are now considered commonest causes of
low back ache have been made.
However, in olden days the physician knew the pathology of sciatica. Sciatica has
been recorded since antiquity and is mentioned by Shakespeare. Its association with
backache and spinal deformity was well described by the second half of the 19th
century.
Physicians interested in backache are not inclined to read essay on anatomy, they are
more interested in the bottom line- how do I Treat? However Physicians need an
understanding of anatomy to get to light to appreciate to which element lumbar spine
can be injured and thus become painful to prescribe treatment on rational basis.
1) LUMBAR VERTEBRAE 62
Each lumbar vertebra is divided in to three sets of functional elements.
1) Anterior element - consisting vertebral body
2) The middle elements - consisting of pedicles
Page: 23
Disease Review
3) Posterior elements - laminae, articular process, spinous process, accessory
process, transverse process, mamillary process.
a) ANTERIOR ELEMENT
These are the essential components of vertebral column endowing it with bulk and
height. They sustain compression loads applied to the vertebral column, including not
only body weight, but also the compression loads imparted by contraction of back
muscles.
b. THE MIDDLE ELEMENTS/ PEDICLES
They are the only connection between the posterior and anterior elements. It transfers
the controlling forces in the posterior to anterior elements.
c. POSTERIOR ELEMENT
Regulates the passive and active forces applied to the vertebral column and
there by control its movements.
i) Articular process provides a locking mechanism that resists forward sliding, and
twisting of the vertebral bodies. The spinous processes, transverse processes,
mamillary processes, and accessory processes provides areas for muscle attachments
and constitute lever that enhances the action of the attached muscles.
ii) The lamina transmits the forces from spinous process and the inferior articular
processes to the pedicles. Thus they are susceptible to injuries such as pars intra
articular fractures.
2) JOINTS
When any two lumbar vertebrae are articulated they form a three joint complex
Page: 24
Disease Review
called the motion segment. An intra vertebral disc forms the principle between two
vertebral bodies. The other 2 joints are formed by the articulation of superior articular
processes of the vertebra and inferior articular process of the vertebra above. These
are known as zygophyseal/ Apophyseal/ Facet joints.
3) INTRA VERTEBRAL DISCS
Each intra vertebral disc consists of three components.
i) Central gelatinous nucleus pulposus
ii) Surrounding annulus fibrosis
iii) Pair of vertebral end plates
i) CENTRAL GELATINOUS NUCLEUS PULPOSUS
Nucleus consists of a matrix of proteoglycans that bind considerable amount water.
ii) SURROUNDING ANNULUS FIBROSIS
It consists concentric laminae of collagen fibers. In each laminae the fibers are
parallel and oriented 65 degree from the vertical, but the direction of inclination
alternates in successive laminae. The inner fibers of the annular fibrosus envelop the
nucleus pulposus and are attached to the margins of the vertebral end plates. The outer
fibers are attached to the margins of the vertebral bodies and constitute the
ligamentous portion of the annulus fibrosus.
iii) VERTEBRAL END PLATES
These are the cartilaginous substance which covers the superior and inferior surface of
each vertebral body within the area encircled by the ring apophysis. The two end
plates of each disc cover the nucleus pulposus as well as the inner 2/3rd of the annular
fibrosus.
The foremost function of disc is to separate the vertebral bodies so that movements
may occur between the vertebral bodies. The disc must be sufficiently compliant to
Page: 25
Disease Review
allow movement but sufficiently strong to with stand compression. Compression
between vertebral bodies is fundamentally resisted passively by the sheer bulk of the
annulus fibrosus. The role of nucleus pulposus is to brace the annulus pulposus and
there by braced it is able to with stand the compression loads, and an impairment of
nucleus function compromises the ability of annulus to withstand compression loads
causing it to fail by buckling.
4. ZYGOPHYSEAL JOINTS
These are the typical synovial joints endowed with cartilage, capsule and synovial
membrane. The articular facets exhibit variations in both the shape of their articular
surface and general direction in which they face. Such variations determine the extent
to which joints can prevent forward sheer translations between vertebral bodies and
axial rotations of the inter-body joint. These movements are resulted by the impaction
of interior articular process of the vertebra below. The only movement permitted by
the lumbar zygophyseal joints sliding movement in a vertical direction, which is
executed during flexion and extension of the vertebral column.
5. LIGAMENTS
The role of ligaments of the lumbar spine has been over emphasized. In effect, no
ligaments can stabilize the lumbar spine.
Major ligaments are:
1) Anterior longitudinal ligament
2) Posterior longitudinal ligament
3) Ligamentum flavum
4) Supraspinatum ligament
5) Inter spinous ligament
6) Inter transverse ligament
Page: 26
Disease Review
7) Ilio lumbar ligament
1) Anterior longitudinal ligament
These are broad, strong fibrous band attached to the anterior surface of all vertebrae.
It decreases in width at the level of disc. It consists of tendons from crus of
diaphragm.
2) Posterior longitudinal ligament
It runs posterior to the body of vertebrae separating it from dural sac. It is loosely
attached and has inter- woven connection with disc. It has only a nominal role in
resisting separation of posterior ends of vertebral bodies during flexion.
3) Ligamentum flavum
It connects laminae and extends laterally to the articular facet. It is thickest in lumbar
region. It assists in restoring the column to correct attitude after flexion position and
may protect disc from injury.
4) Supraspinatum ligament
It joins the tips of the spinous processes of the vertebrae with aid of intra spinous
ligament.
5) Inter spinous ligament
It connects the adjoining spinous processes from their tips to roots.
6) Inter transverse ligament
These are essentially membranes that extend between adjacent transverse processes.
They constitute part of facial system that separates the muscles of the ventral
compartment from the posterior compartment.
7) Ilio lumbar ligament
Page: 27
Disease Review
Binds Transverse process of L5 to the Ileum. It resists forward sliding, lateral bending
and axial rotation of L5 on sacrum.
6. MUSCLES
Muscles directly control the movement of vertebral column. In relaxed standing
posture almost all muscles are relaxed except slight activity in psoas and abdominus.
a. The psoas major:
It arises from the antero-lateral aspect of the lumbar spine and inserts into the lesser
trochanter of the femur. It is a flexor of the hip. Its fibers run too close to lumbar spine
to exert significant lumbar movement of lumbar vertebra. There fore it cannot flex the
lumbar spine. However, upon contraction as in the exercise of the sit-ups the psoas
exerts immense pressure on the vertebral disc.
b. Quadratus lumborum;
It is wide rectangular muscle that consist a complex aggregation of various oblique
and longitudinally running fibers that connects the lumbar transverse process; the
ileum and the 12th rib. Its main action is fixation of 12th rib during respiration. It has
a weak action to flex the lumbar spine laterally.
While bending forward first 60 degree of movement occurs at lumbar spine and
followed by additional movement, 25 degree at hips and pelvis. Glutei and hamstrings
lock the initial flexion of the pelvis. At the end of flexion, all spinal muscles are
relaxed and the humans are at maximum strain at the movement. Extension of the
back with loads shows increased activity in back muscles.
Intertransversarii Laterales- Connects consecutive transverse process and are
presumed to act synergistically with Quadratus lumborum in lateral flexion of Lumbar
Page: 28
Disease Review
spine. Lumbar back muscles – Lie behind and cover the posterior elements of
Lumbar vertebrae.
a) Inter transversarii mediales – small muscles that connect the accessory process and
mamillary process of one vertebra to other. They serve as large proprioceptor
transducers.
b) Interspinales – Short muscles that connect the spinous process of adjacent lumbar
vertebrae. They also probably serve a proprioceptive function.
c. Multifidus
The multifidus is para median muscle fascicles that stem from each of the lumbar
spinous process and radiate to caudal insertion on mamillary process and the ileum
and the sacrum. The main action of this muscle is to extend the lumbar spine or
control its flexion, but it also opposes the flexion effect of the abdominal muscles
where they contract to produce rotation of the lumbar spine.
7) NERVE SUPPLY
Vertebral bodies receive the supply from Gray rami communicantes and ventral rami
in the form of anterior and posterior longitudinal (sinu vertebral nerves) plexuses. The
I.V. Disc innervation is provided by rami communicantes anterolaterally and sinu
vertebral nerves posteriorly. The structures posterior to the intervertebral foramen are
supplied by branches of dorsal rami.
8) BLOOD SUPPLY
From Pairs of Lumbar arteries, the upper four of which arise from the descending
aorta, whereas the fifth one arises from median sacral artery.
Vein – the venous drainage of vertebral bodies starts as a subchondral post capillary
plexus beneath each vertebral end plate.
Page: 29
Disease Review
BIOMECHANICS OF LUMBAR SPINE
The cardinal movements of the lumbar spine are Flexion, Extension, Axial rotation
and lateral Flexion.
*Flexion and Extension
Flexion and Extension involve the combination of sagittal rotation and translation.
During flexion of the lumbar spine, each vertebra rotates and translates anteriorly; a
reciprocal combination occurs in extension. The range of rotation is about 6- 100 per
segment, and the range of translation is about 2mm. Translation is resisted primarily
by zygapophyseal joints and secondarily by annulus fibrosis of vertebral joints.
Rotation is resisted annulus fibrosis, capsules of zygapophyseal joints, ligaments of
IV joints, and most importantly by active or passive tension of back muscles
supplemented by passive tension in the thoracolumbar fascia.
Extension is limited primarily by bony impaction. Either the spinous process impact
against each other or the inferior articular process impacts against the laminae below.
*Axial rotation
Because there are no primary rotators of the lumbar spine, axial rotation is a
movement imposed secondarily on the lumbar vertebrae and their joints.
Rotation is achieved by the oblique abdominal muscles acting on the thorax, the
movements of which impose a screwing effect on the lumbar spine from L1 to the
sacrum.
The motion is resisted by impaction of zygapophyseal joints and by tension developed
in the annulus fibrosus; resistance limits the range of rotation at each lumbar segment
to <30.
*Lateral flexion- Little is known about the lateral flexion of the lumbar spine, which
involves a complex and variable combination of lateral bending and rotatory
Page: 30
Disease Review
movements of the inter body movements and diverse movements of the
zygapophyseal joints.
MECHANICAL INJURIES
Flexion
Flexion movements of the lumbar spine are not hazardous if the movements remain
strictly in the sagittal plane. The discs and zygapophyseal joints are well designed to
withstand this movement. More over biomechanical studies have failed to
demonstrate injury to the intervertebral disc simply with flexion.
Because the back muscles are the major contributors to controlling or resisting
flexion, in principle, they are foremost liable to injuries during flexion. Acute muscle
tears may occur during forceful flexion or extension; otherwise, however lumbar
spine is intrinsically resistant to injury under these circumstances.
Extension
Several types of injuries may befall the lumbar spine during forceful extension
movements. During forceful extension, movement is initially arrested by the inferior
articular processes against the lamina. This impaction may cause a chiseling effect on
the lamina, resulting in pars inter articular fracture. Otherwise, if lamina resists the
impaction, the continuous extension force is dissipated as posterior rotation of contra
lateral zygapophyseal joint, which may result in disruption of joint capsule.
Flexion and torsion
The lumbar spine is practically vulnerable to injury during flexion movements
combined with torsion. The flexion movements prestress the annulus fibrosis, thereby
reducing its capacity to withstand subsequent axial rotation. Mean while, because the
zygapophyseal joints are subluxated, smaller portions of their surfaces are in contact
to resist rotation.
Page: 31
Disease Review
Usually axial rotation occurs around an axis through the vertebral body, but the
contralateral zygapophyseal joint soon becomes compressed. Continued torsion
results in rotation about an axis through the compressed joint. The contra lateral joint
moves backwards and the intervertebral disc shears side ways.
The resultant injuries are several. Subchondral fractures may occur on the
compression side as well as overt fractures of the articular process and fractures of
pars inter artiularis.
Compression
Compression injuries of the intervertebral disc may result from excessive axial
loading by gravity or muscle action. Gravitational injuries occur in instances such as a
fall on the buttocks. Muscular injuries may result from severe exertion or pulling.
The critical feature of a compression injury is fracture of the end plate. This does not
hurt and may heal but initiate the process known as internal disc disruption. The
homeostasis of the nucleus pulposus is interfered by an inflammatory response or by
an elusive autoimmune mechanism. The matrix of nucleus pulposus undergoes a
biochemical and biophysical degeneration. It decreases its water binding capacity and
its bracing effect on annulus fibrosus. This leads to subluxation of vertebrae and loss
of disc height resulting in the condition called isolated disc resorption.
Disc resorption becomes painful by chemicals or other mechanical means.
Inflammatory chemicals from the nucleus pulposus may stimulate the endings of
nerve fibers in the outer annulus fibrosus. As fewer and fewer laminae remains to
sustain the normal everyday process applied to the annulus fibrosus, the remaining
intact fibers have to bear an increasingly greater load. The increasing stress on theses
fibers constitutes a mechanical bais of pain from annulus fibrosus.
Page: 32
Disease Review
NIDANA
The word Nidana is used in Ayurvedic classics in a broad sense. This word is derived
from the Sanskrit Dhaatu ‘Ni’ that carries the meaning—to determine. (Ni—Niscaya deeyate
jnaanam). This word refers to etiopathogenesis of the disease either in general or to the
etiology of illness in particular. From the perspective of treatment, Nidana has utmost
importance as the avoidance of etiological factor forms the first and foremost line of
treatment. This is followed by specific treatment as per etiopathogenesis of the disease.
Nidana in general may be categorized into three groups:
•Asatmendriyaartha samyoga
•Prajnaparadha
•Parinama
In addition, to obtain a vague picture of the factors involved Nidana can be divided
into Samanya & Vishesha Nidana.
The description of Nidana for all the disorders is not uniform in Ayurvedic literature.
In certain diseases, we can find description of both Saamaanya as well as Vishesha Nidana,
but it is restricted to Saamanya Nidana with regard to many other diseases.
Though the etiologies of all the Vatavyadhis are similar, the samprapti & clinical
presentation is unique for each Vatavyadhi, distinguishing them from one another.63
Charaka64 & Bhavaprakasha65 clearly mentions the causative factors of Vatavyadhi;
but in Sushruta samhita, Ashtanga Sangraha & Ashtanga Hrudaya etc. the causes of
vatavyadhi have not been clearly described. However, in these texts the causative factors of
provoked vatadosha are available.66, 67,68,69,70
In Gadanigraha written by Shodhala we can get a clear reference of Katigraha as a
disease along with other vatavyadhis.
Even though Katigraha is not projected as a separate disease in Bruhatrayees, from a
reference by Cakrapani while commenting on Caraka Nidana 8/40, it may be diagnosed as a
separate disease. He says that ‘any symptom may manifest as a separate disease also’.
Page: 33
Disease Review
However, in these references also an exclusive Nidana for Katigraha cannot be found.
From the Adhishtana and lakshana of Katigraha we can make out that the condition is
precipitated by vatadosha. So the Nidana factors for Vatavyaadhi in general can be considered
as the Nidana of Katigraha. Moreover, Asthi being the dhaatu involved in the pathogenesis,
Nidana for Asthivaha and Purishavaha srotodushti may act as Nidanas for Katigraha.
In addition to these Caraka and Vagbhata has mentioned Dhatukshaya and
Margavarodha to be the root cause of all the Vatavyadhis.71, 72, 73
Therefore, all the etiological factors of Vatavyadhi as well as Vata Prakopa are taken
as Nidana of Katigraha and the same is elaborated in the following subtitles.
A) Aaharaja (dietetic factors)
B) Viharaja (behavior factors)
C) Aagantuja (external factors) and
D) Anya Hetuja (miscellaneous factors)
A) Aaharaja: The causative dietetic factors included under this group have been again
subdivided into the following 8 groups.
i. Dravyatah: In this group, all the dietetic articles responsible for Vata Prakopa have
been included.
ii. Gunatah: This group include the quality of dietetic articles like Rooksha, Sheeta etc.
which lead to the Prakopa of Vata
iii. Rasatah: The various tastes of the dietetic articles, the excessive use of which lead to
the Prakopa of Vata have been included in this group.
iv. Karmatah: Excessive use of Visht’hambhi article may lead to the Prakopa of Vata and
it has been included under this heading.
v. Veeryatah: For instance, the Sheeta Veerya articles cause the Prakopa of Vata.
vi. Matratah: Less eating or fasting comes under this heading.
Page: 34
Disease Review
vii. Kalatah: The Vata Prakopa occurs at the end of digestion. Eating before digestion of
the previous meal also leads to Vata Prakopa. In addition, it has been observed that
the backache is precipitated by cold exposure.
viii. Mithyopayogatah : The violation of the rules like not to drink water when hungry or
not to eat when thirsty also lead to Vata Prakopa.
ix. Desha swaroopa:
Jangala desha is also an etiological factor for backache. Most of the etiological
factors said above are the etiological factors of vataja shula. Pakwashaya is the main
seat of vata. The purisadhara kala also serves the function of asthidhara kala. Hence,
the factors of purisa vaha sroto duśti are worth mentioning here. The purisha
vegarodha, ati bhojana, ajirna and durbala agni are the causes for purisa vaha sroto
duśti.
B) Viharaja: The causative factors related to the habit and regimen of the patient has been
subdivided into two groups’ viz. I. Karmatah, II. Kalatah.
I. Karmatah: Such habits of (a) Kayatah (somatic) and (b) Manah (psychic) which lead to
the Prakopa of Vayu have been included under this heading.
a) Kayatah: The etiological factors of Vata related with the body have been further
subdivided into the following sub-groups.
(1) Mithyaprayogatah: The faulty habits of the body or improper use of body which
may lead to the Prakopa of Vaayu have been included under this heading.
(2) Atiyogatah: The excessive uses of the Karmendriyas or the parts of the body,
which cause Prakopa of the Vayu, have been included under this heading.
b) Manah: The psychic factors responsible for Vata Prakopa have been included under this
heading.
II. Kalatah: The periodic factors responsible for Vata Prakopa have been included under this
heading.
Page: 35
Disease Review
C) Aagantuja:
External factors like trauma leading to Vata Prakopa have been under this heading.
D) Anya Hetuja:
All other causatives factors of the Prakopa of Vata, which could not be included in
any of above classification, have been presented under this heading. The details of the
causative factors are enlisted in table no.1.
In general, by the activity of the etiological factors the addition of the qualities similar to the
one present in the Vata Dosha causes its morbidity. As per this principle it is clear that the
factors mentioned in the above list cause imbalance of Vata Dosha. So also these factors may
cause the illness Katigraha, as this diseases is regarded as one of the Vatavyadhi.
• Hetu (Etiological factors) of Vata Prakopa and
Vata Vyadhi so also Katigraha
Table No. 1:
Causes Ca. Su. A.S. A.H. B.P
(A) AAHARAJA (Dietetic causes)
I. Dravyatah (Substantial)
Aadhaki (Cajanus cajan) - + - - -
Bisa (Nelumbuo nucifera) - + + - -
Chanaka (Cicer arietinum) - - + - -
Chirbhata (Cuccumus melo) - - + - -
Harenu (Pisum sativum) - + - - -
Jaambava (Eugenia jambolena) - - + - -
Kalaya (Lathyrus sativus) - + + - -
Page: 36
Disease Review
Kalinga (Holarrhena antidysenterica) - - + - -
Kariya (Capparis decidua) - - + - -
Koradusha (Paspalum scrobiculatum) - + - - -
Masoora (Lens culinaris) - + - - -
Mudga (Phaseolus mungo) - + - - -
Nishpaava (Dolichos lablab) - + - - -
Neevara (Hygroryza aristata) - + - - -
Shaluka (Nelumbium speciosum) - - + - -
Shushkashaaka (Dry vegetable) + - - -
Shyaamaka (Setaria italica) - + - - -
Tinduka (Diospyros tomentosa) - - + - -
Trunadhaanya (Grassy grain) - - + - -
Tumba (Lagenaria valgaris) - - + - -
Uddalaka (A variety of Paspalum
scrobiculatum) - + - - -
Varaka (Carthamus tinctorius) - + - - -
Viroodhaka (Germinated Seed) - - + - -
II. Gunatah
Rukshanna (ununctous diet) + + + + +
Laghvanna (light diet) - + + - +
Gurvanna (heavy diet) - - + + -
Sheetaanna (cold diet) + - + - -
Page: 37
Disease Review
III. Rasatah
Kashaayaanna (astringent taste) - + + + +
Katvanna (acrid taste) - + + + +
Tiktaanna (Bitter taste) - + + + +
IV. Karmatah
Vishthambhi (constipative diet) - - + - -
V. Veeryatah
Sheeta (cold) - - - - -
VI. Maatratah
Abhojana (fasting) + + - - +
Alpaashana (dieting) + - + + -
Vishmaashana (Taking unequal food) - + - - -
VII. Kaalatah
Adhyashana (eating before digestion of
previous meal) - + - - -
Jeernanta (After digestion) - + + + +
Pramitashana (Taking food in improper time) - - + + +
(B) VIHAARAJA (Behaviour)
I. Karmatah
1. Mithyayogatah
Ashmabhramana (Whirling stone) - - + - -
Ashmachalana (Shaking of stone) - - + - -
Ashmavikshepa (Throwing of stone) - - + - -
Ashmotkshepa (pulling down stone) - - + - -
Page: 38
Disease Review
Balavat vigraha (wrestling with superior
healthy one) - + + - -
Damyagaja nigraha (subduing untameable
elephant) cow and horse - - + - -
Divaasvapna (day sleep) + + - - -
Dukhaasana (uncomfortable sitting) + - - - -
Dukhashayya (uncomfortable sleeping) + - - - -
Ghadhotsadana (strong rubbing) - - + - -
Kashtabhramana (whirling of wood) - - + - -
Kashtachalana (shaking of wood) - - + - -
Kashta vikshepa (throwing of wood) - - + - -
Kashtotkshepa (pulling down wood) - - + - -
Lohabhramana (whirling of metal) - - + - -
Lohachalana (Shaking of metal) - - + - -
Lohavikshepa (Throwing of metal) - - + - -
Lohotkshepa (Pulling down metal) - - + - -
Paragatana (Strike with others) - - + - -
Shilabhramana (Whirling of rock) - - + - -
Shilachalana (Shaking of rock) - - + - -
Shilavikshepa (Throwing of rock) - - + - -
Shilotkshepa(Pulling down rock) - - + - -
Bhaaraharana (Head loading) - + + - -
Vegadharana (Voluntary suppression of
natural urges) + + + + +
Page: 39
Disease Review
Vegodeerana (Forceful drive of natural urges) - - + + -
Vishamopachara (Abnormal gestures) + - - - -
2. Atiyogatah
Atigamana (excessive walking) + - + - -
Atihaasya (Loud laughing) - + + + -
Atijrumbha (Loud yawning) - + - - -
Atikharacapakarshana (Violent stretching
of the bow) - - + + -
Atilanghana (Leaping over ditch) + + + - -
Atiplavana (Excessive bounding) + + - - -
Atiprabhaashana (Continuous talking) - - + + -
Atipradhaavana (Excessive running) + + - - -
Atiprajaagarana (Excessive awakening) + + + + +
Atiprapatana (Leaping from height) - + - - -
Atiprapeedana (Violent pressing blow) - + - - -
Atipratarana (Excessive swimming) - + + - -
Atiraktamokshana (Excessive Blood letting) - - - - +
Atisrama (over exertion) - - - - +
Atisthaana (standing for a long period) - + - - -
Ativyaayaama (Violent exercise) + + + + +
Ativyavaaya (excessive sexual intercourse) + + + + +
Atiadhyayana (excessive study) - + + - -
Adyaasana (sitting for a long period) - + - - -
Atyuccabhaashana (speaking loudly) - - - + -
Gajaaticarya (excessive riding on elephant) - - + + -
Page: 40
Disease Review
Kriyaatiyoga (excessive purification therapy) - - + + +
Paadaaticarya (walking long distances) - + - - -
Rathaticarya (excessive riding on chariot) - + - - -
Turan’gaaticarya (excessive riding on horse) - + - - -
II. Manah
Bhaya (fear) + - + + +
Chinta (worry) + - + - -
Krodha (Anger) + - - - -
Mada (Intoxication) - - - - +
Shoka (Grief) + - + + +
Utkantha (Anxiety) - - + - -
III. Kalatah
Abhra (cloudy season) - + - - -
Aparaahnna (evening) - + + + +
Apararatra (the end of the night) - - + + -
Greeshma (summer season) - - + + -
Pravata (windy day) - + + - -
Shishira (winter) - - - - +
Sheetakaala (early winter) - + - - +
Varsha (rainy season) - + + - +
(C) AAGANTUJA
Abhighata (trauma) + - - - -
Gaja, Ushtra, Ashvasrnghrayanapatamsana
(Falling from speedy, running elephant,
camel and horse) + - - - -
Page: 41
Disease Review
(D) ANYA HETUJA
Aama (undigested article) + - - - +
Asruk kshaya (loss of blood) + + + - -
Dhaatukshaya (loss of body elements) + - - - -
Doshakshaya (depletion of dosha) + - - - -
Rogaatikarshana (emaciation due to disease) + - - - -
Gadakruta mamskshaya (wasting due to
disease) - - - - +
Page: 42
Disease Review
CAUSES OF LOW BACK ACHE The causes of lowback ache can be classified in following way:
A) Reasons in the Back
B) Reasons other than Back
A) In the back
Congenital causes – Spina Bifida, Spondylolisthesis, Hemivertebra, Split vertebra,
Abnormality in the articular process, Sacralisation of the transverse process of the 5th
lumbar vertebra.
Traumatic causes – Lumbosacral strain, injuries to intervertebral joints, ligaments
and muscles, spondylolisthesis, compression fracture, vertebral process fracture and
ruptured disc.
Functional defects – Anteroposterior imbalance (pregnancy, potbelly, fixed flexion
deformity of the hip joints) and lateral imbalance (scoliosis, leg length discrepancy).
Inflammatory causes – Pyogenic osteomyelitis, Tuberculosis, Rheumatoid arthritis,
brucellosis, ankylosing spondylitis, Myositis, fibrositis.
Degenerative causes – Osteo arthritis(Spondylosis), Senile osteoporosis,
Degenerative disc disease.
Neoplastic causes
Primary tumours e.g. multiple myeloma, eosinophilic granuloma, haemangioma,
Osteoid osteoma.
Metastatic tumours from breast, bronchus, kidney, supra renal, prostate, thyroid,
gastro intestinal tract.
Page: 43
Disease Review
C) Reasons other than Back
Abdominal Disorders e.g. pancreatitis, cholecystitis, biliary calculus, peptic
ulcer, hiatus hernia.
Pelvic Disorders e.g. inflammatory condition of the ovaries and tubes, any intra
pelvic tumour.
Genito urinary causes e.g. renal infection, renal or ureteric calculus, prostatitis,
prostatic carcinoma, seminal vesiculitis.
Vascular disorders e.g. ischemic pain from occlusion of the aorta or iliac arteries
and aneurismal dilatation of the aorta may cause backache.
Page: 44
Disease Review
SAMPRAPTI
The manner of dosha vitiation right from the contact with the Nidanas & the course
they follow, culminating in the development of specific clinical manifestation is
known by the name Samprapti.
Every factor connected with the process of disease at various stages is considered in
detail in Samprapti. It gives a clear idea of the disease process helping in the proper
management of the condition.
Gadanigrahakara considers katigraha to be one among the vata vyadhis. It clearly
projects Vata dosha as the major factor behind the whole pathogenesis involved in
Katigraha. He explains that the vitiated shudha or sama vayu takes its ashraya in the
katipradesha causing pain and stiffness. In the dominance of Vata dosha, Shula is the
main presenting symptom. It is already mentioned that all the Nidanas of Vatavyadhi
& vata prakopa can be regarded as Nidana of Katigraha.
Acharya Caraka explained – due to the intake of Vatakara Ahara Vihara Vata vitiation
take place. This vitiated Vata lodges in Rikta Srotas i.e. Srotas in where Shunyata of
Snehadi Guna is present. Vata after settling in Rikta Srotas produce disease related to
that Srotas74.
Acarya Vagbhata frames the Samprapti of Vata Vyadhi like – Dhatukshaya
aggravates Vata and the same is also responsible to produce Riktata of Srotas. Thus
the vitiated Vata travels through out the body and settles in the Rikta Srotas and
further vitiates the Srotas leading to the manifestation of Vata Vyadhi 75.
Here an attempt has been made to explain how this Srotoriktata occurs due to
Nidanasevana.
The chief properties of Parthiva Dravya are Guru, Sthula, Sthira, Gandha Guna in
excess. These are the properties, which are necessary for Sthairya and Upacaya of the
Page: 45
Disease Review
body. Excessive intake of Dravyas having Laghu, Ruksha, Sukshma, Khara properties
lead to Guru and Sneha Guna Abhava due to their opposite quality. Thus it leads to
Dhatukshaya in the body. Akasha is the Mahabhuta that produces Sushirata and
Laghuta in the body. Vayu Mahabuta fills up this Sushirata. So due to Dhatukshaya
Akasha Mahabhuta increases in the body producing Sushirata and Laghuta
simultaneously Vayu fills it up.
From this description it can be stated that the meaning of word ‘Riktata’ is Sushirata
i.e. increase in Akasha and Vayu Mahabhuta. While commenting on word ‘Riktata’
Cakrapani says that ‘Riktata’ means lack of Snehadiguna.
DhatuKshaya as a reason for Katigraha
Due to various Nidanas and old age vata will take its domination in the body. This
will lead to Kapha Abhava. In addition, Jataragni and Dhatvagni get impaired, by
which Dhatus formed will not be of good quality. Degeneration of body elements
takes place due to predominance of Vata in its Ruksha, Khara, etc. Guna and loss of
Kapha in quality and quantity.
As the Shleshma Bhava decreases in the body, the Kapha Bheda i.e. Shleshaka Kapha
in the joints also decreases in quality and quantity. Reduction of Kapha in Sandhis
makes Sandhi Bandhana Shithilata. Ashrayashrayi Sambandha also leads Asthidhatu
Kshaya. Asthi being the main participant of the joint its Kshaya leads Khavaigunya in
the joints.
In this condition if Nidana Sevana done further produces Vata Prakopa. If Vata
Prakopa is not corrected by appropriate means and simultaneously if the person
indulges in Asthivaha and Majjavaha Sroto Dushtikara Nidana, the Prakupita Vata
spreads all over the body through these Srotas. In the meantime, Sthanasamshraya of
Page: 46
Disease Review
Prakupita Vata take place in the Khavaigunyayukta Sandhi in Katipradesha. This
localized Vayu due to its Ruksha, Laghu, Kharadi Guna over power and undo all
properties of Sleshaka Kapha producing stiffness and pain in the katipradesha
ultimately resulting in the disease Katigraham.
Samprapti of katigraha can be explained and understood based on Shat kriya kalas –
Sanchaya, Prakopa, Prasara, Sthanasamshraya, Vyaktha & Bhedavasthas.
1) Sanchaya Avastha
This stage represents the inceptive phase of the disease when the dosha is stated to
have accumulated and stagnated in its own sthaanas. Chayavastha is characterized by
vague and ill-defined symptomatology though however, some symptoms
characteristic of dosha involved may be noted. Those include dullness, sense of
fullness in the abdomen by vata and heaviness of limbs, laziness due to kapha.
There will be aversion towards the similar and attraction towards the contraries. In
this context, the person may feel an aversion towards those factors responsible for the
chaya of vata. If this stage is neglected or if proper treatment measures are not
adopted it enters the second phase of prakopa.
2) Prakopa avastha
Vilayana roopa vrudhi or increased quantity of swollen and excited
aggravated dosha, which is confined to its own location, constitutes the prakopa
avastha. If the person continues contact with particular Nidanas even after chaya
lakhanas are seen it ultimately results in this stage.
In the present context the vatakara Nidanas like balavadvigraha, ativyayaama etc.
leads to further aggravation and excitation of vata dosha providing perfect base for
manifestation of a vata vyadhi.
Page: 47
Disease Review
This stage may give rise to symptoms characteristic of doshas like abdominal pain,
thirst, burning sensation, disinclination for food, nausea etc.
Neglecting this stage results in the third stage of prasara.
3) Prasara Avastha
The term prasara means to spread. In this stage, the excited and swollen dosha is
stated to spread over and extend to other parts, organs and structures of the body.
It is to be noted that vayu which possess the power of locomotion or extreme mobility
is responsible for this expansion. The prakupita dosha sometimes singly or in two or
all three of them together, with rakta, expand and swarms the body in all directions.
As they move in different directions it causes various disorders and dysfunctions, the
nature and location of which depends on the direction the doshas move.
In the present context when the excited vata spreads to the marga of shleshaka kapha
present in the joints of katipradesha it causes anga saada.
So we can conclude the first three stages of kriya kala that a vague and varied
presentation of symptoms are manifested which does not give enough ground to
diagnose it as katigraha. If the disease is detected in this stage, it becomes easy to
arrest the progression of the disease with timely interventions like adoption of proper
ahara and vihara.
4) Sthana Samshraya Avastha
The vitiated doshas relocate themselves in sites of other doshas vitiating the dushyas
present there and marks the beginning of specific diseases pertaining to the site.
Obviously, this stage represents the prodromal phase or the stage of poorvaroopa and
the disease is yet to manifest fully.
This dosha dushya sammurchana is due to srotovaigunya or the pathological
involvement of related srotas. In this context, various vatakara Nidanas especially
Page: 48
Disease Review
those giving undue strain to the katipradesha produces srotovigunata in the channels
present there. The vitiated dosha (vyana, apana) undergoes localization at the site of
khavaigunya. Here the dosha vitiates the dushya (asthi, snayu, peshi, majja) by
confining itself to the katipradesha and does the shoshana of shleshaka kapha present
in the joints resulting in katigraha. The resultant symptoms of pain and stiffness are
found in a mild form distinctive of poorvaroopa of vata vyadhis.
5) Vyaktha Avastha
The disease manifests completely with its symptoms fully developed and
unambiguous in form in this stage.
This stage is marked by the presence of pain due to the vitiated vata and stiffness due
to shoshana of the shleshaka kapha in the joints of katipradesha. The normal
movements at the katipradesha are hampered due to the stiff joints.
6) Bhedavastha
The disease when neglected in vyakthavastha it attains bhedavastha. This stage can
make the condition worse by manifestation of degenerative changes in the dooshyaas
(asthi) which are irreversible. The disease proceeds into more severe forms due to
extensive dhatukshaya. It finally attains asadhyata in this stage.
Page: 49
Disease Review
Chart No : 1
Samprapthi of Katigraham
UKTA NIDANA SEVANA VARDHAKYA
DHATUKSHAYA
VATA PRAKOPA KSHAYA OF KAPHA BHAVA IN THE BODY
CIRCULATION THROUGH SHLESHAKA KAPHA KSHAYA RASAYANI IN SANDHI OF KATI
KHAVAIGUNYA IN SANDHI OF KATI
STHANASAMSHRAYA IN KATI
KATIGRAHAM
Page: 50
Disease Review
Table No: 2
Samprapti Ghatakas of Katigraha
Vāta Vyana
Apana
(Vrudhi)
•Dosha
Kapha Śleshaka
(Kshaya)
Dhaatu Asthi
•Dushya
Upadhaatu Snayu
•Udbhava sthaana Pakwaashaya
•Vyakta sthaana Kati
•Sancharasthana Ardha sharira
•Srotas Asthivaha, Purishavaha
•Mārga Madhyama roga marga
Page: 51
Disease Review
POORVAROOPA
Poorvaroopa are indications of impending diseases. They occur prior to
complete manifestation of disease and may suggest the forthcoming illness.76 During
the course of the Samprapti of an illness, the morbid Doshas circulating ubiquitously
in the body tend to localize in an area and produces some of the unique symptoms
and is referred by the name Poorvaroopa. Diagnosis at this stage of the illness gains
paramount importance, as the effective treatment at this stage definitely reduces the
possible organic damage as well as degree of morbidity.
In classics, the description regarding the Poorvaroopa of Katigraha is not available.
Even then, few of the general citations in the classics pertaining to the occurrence of
the Poorvaroopa in Vatavyadhi is worth mentioning. Acharya Charaka is of the
opinion that, in general the vague symptoms, or else any few symptoms of the
respective Vatavyadhi in its minimal severity, that too in their initial stage are the
Poorvaroopa.77 This nature of the Poorvaroopa is described as Avyakta Lakshana.
Author of the Madhukos’a commentary emphasize the vague nature of the
Poorvaroopa.
By the consideration of above cited general rule of Poorvaroopa in regards to
Vatavyadhi, Katigraha being a Vatavyadhi, Poorvaroopa of this disease may be
assumed. Vague pain, mild discomfort in the low back and limitation in the spinal
movements in its minimal severity may be considered as Poorvaroopa of katigraha.
The development of these symptoms following excessive exercise straining the back,
or else direct trauma to the back are always corroboratory of Katigraha.
Page: 52
Disease Review
ROOPA
Roopa appears in the Vyaktaavastha i.e., fifth Kriyaakaala of the
disease. This is the unique stage of the illness, where in it is clearly recognizable as all
its characteristic signs and symptoms manifest. Here in this stage, the dosha-dushya
sammoorchana is completed with the manifestation of all the lakshanas of vyadhi
including the pratyatma linga, which are essential for the diagnosis of the disease.
Katigraha being a vatavyadhi is characterized by pain and stiffness at
the katipradesha. These symptoms manifest in a clear and distinguishable form from
its vague and mild form in poorvaroopavastha. The term katigraha itself is self-
explanatory pointing out the characteristic feature of graham or stiffness. The
condition is such that almost all the movements at the katipradesha or the lower back
region are hampered preventing the person from performing his day-to-day activities.
Acharya Charaka has hinted regarding various vatavyadhis, which can occur
according to the Hetu and Sthana vishesha, other than those he has explained in
detail78. Based on this excerpt various disorders can be considered due to vitiated vata
taking ashraya in katipradesha, including katigraha. This progression occurs due to
various Nidanas mentioned earlier including direct injury to the Katipradesha.
Ruja:
Acarya Shodhala while explaining katigraha has mentioned pain as one of the
prime symptom. Ruja is the term used by him to describe the character of pain in
this disease.
‘Ruja Vedana.’79
‘Ruk Satatam Shulam’80
‘Ruk Shulam’81
Page: 53
Disease Review
In a typical case, pain is confined to the katipradesha or the Lumbo sacral and
sacroiliac region only. Pain can arise due to the vitiated vyaana vata, which dries up
the shleshaka kapha in the joints creating friction. If the vitiation is due to any
abhighaata pain can manifest because of injury to the sandhi as well as the
surrounding structures. Radiation of pain towards the lower limb is not seen in a
typical case, but can be found in few low back disorders where there is a defect in the
Inter vertebral discs, which is giving tension to a nerve root passing out.
Graham :
The characteristic feature of katigraha is graha or stiffness at the katipradesha. The
vitiated vata when it takes ashraya in katipradesha it leads to the shoshana of the
shleshaka kapha present in the sandhis there. The shoshana of shleshaka kapha leads
to the hampered functioning of the joints preventing all the movements at the
katipradesha. Thus, the movements at the Lumbo-sacral region like flexion, extension,
lateral flexion and rotation are hampered either completely or partially. The degree of
affection varies depending on the presentation of etiological factors, such as the site of
the structures injured and the extent of injury and duration.
Tenderness - Apart from these two classical symptoms, tenderness can be elicited in
conditions when there is severe pain. It can be elicited by pressing the thumb along
the whole length of the spinal column. Tenderness may be elicited by pressing upon
the side of spinous process in an attempt to rotate the vertebra. This can also be
elicited by giving gentle blows on either side of the spine. It must be remembered that
at times the patient may flinch with pain as soon as the skin is being touched.In such
cases pinch up the skin to differentiate whether the pain is in the skin or in the spine.
Page: 54
Disease Review
BACK-ACHE82
In 1911 Meddlton and teacher in Glusgo reported for the first time a case of rupture of
a disc caused by exertion as opposed to severe trauma. The break through in
understanding spinal degenerative diseases came in the early 1930’s. In 1929 ‘Dandy’
reported two cases where loose disc fragments had been removed surgically from
within the spinal canal.
Types of low back pain:
1) Local pain
2) Pain referred to the spine
3) Pain of spine origin referred to legs and gluteal region
4) Radicular pain
5) Muscular spasm
1) Local pain:
Local pain is caused by processes that compress or irritate sensory nerve endings.
They are usually due to fractures, tears or stretching of pain sensitive structures. The
site of pain is near to the affected part of spine. Local pain does not change according.
to the position suggests spine tumor or infection.
2) Referred pain
It may arise from pelvis or abdomen (this usually occurs from abdomen or pelvis) and
rarely radiates to spine.
3) Pain of spine origin referred to legs and gluteal region
Disease occurring in upper lumbar region may refer pain to the lumbar region, groin
or anterior thighs. Disease affecting lower lumbar spine may produce pain radiation to
buttocks, thighs or rarely calves & feet.
Page: 55
Disease Review
4) Classic radicular pain;-
It is usually sharp and radiates from the spine to within the territory of nerve root.
Coughing, sneezing often produces this pain. Patients observe increase in pain during
postural changes sitting stretches the sciatica nerve (L5&S1roots), because the nerve
passes posterior to the hip. Femoral nerve passes anterior to the hip. Its root from L2,
L3.and it is not stretched during sitting position.
5) Muscular spasm
The pain associated muscle spasm although obscure in origin, is commonly associated
with many spinal disorders. Abnormal postures, taut para spinal muscles, and dull
pain accompany the spasms.
Common related conditions, which generate low back pain and stiffness, include
.1) LUMBO SACRAL STRAIN
This condition develops from mechanical stress and strain, which the lumbo sacral
region renders itself. It occurs in both acute and chronic forms. The acute may be due
to sudden blow forcing the joint position beyond the range of movement. The spinal
muscles yield when they are off guard and ligaments sustain full force of injury.
Clinical features include pain and tenderness localized to lumbar region and
restriction of all movementsof spine. The chronic from occurs in individuals with
poor musculature and an increase in the normal lumbar lordosis. Gradually the pain
becomes constant due to gradual attacks. Sciatic pain may be present in case of root
compression.
Management:
1. Local heating in form of hot water bag or infra red or short wave diathermy.
2. NSAID’S
3. Rest
Page: 56
Disease Review
4. Spinal supportive prescriptions like lumbar belt.
2) LUMBAGO (FIBROSITIS)
Fibrositis causing backache often reveals one or more tender nodules lying
superficially in the erector spine of its attachments. In the lumbar region, it is known
as lumbago. The pain causes suddenly as the patient bends his back. If neurological
symptoms are present, it is probable that disc herniations are present. The nodules
may be that of rheumatic fibrositis or local muscular spasm due to nerve root
irritation.
3) LUMBAR DISC DISEASE
This disorder is a common cause of chronic or recurrent low back & leg pain. This
disease is most likely to occur in L5-S1; L4-L5 region. But upper levels also involved
rarely. Degeneration of nucleus pulposus and the annulus fibroses, which increases
with age, may have been asymptomatic & painful. A sneeze, cough, may cause
nucleus pulposus to prolapse, pushing the frayed annular fibrosis posterior. In severe
disc disease, the nucleus may protrude through annulus fibrosus or become extruded
to lie as a free fragment in the vertebral canal. The symptoms of prolapsed disc
consist of pain, abnormal posture, and limitation to spine movement, particularly
flexion or radicular pain. The pattern of radicular pain may suggest involvement of
several nerve roots, a dermatome pattern of sensory loss or deep tender reflex loss.
Lumbar disc diseases are usually unilateral. But bilateral involvement can be seen in
long central disc herniation, that compresses nerve roots at same level.
Other conditions which generate low back pain are:
I. CONGENITAL ANOMALIES OF SPINE83
1) Spina bifida
2) Meningocele
Page: 57
Disease Review
3) Meningo-myocele
4) Syringo-myocele
5) Myocele
1) SPINABIFIDA This develops due to the failure of fusion of the posterior part of
spine resulting in a defect through which the membranes and even spinal cord may
herniate. Usually it affects one vertebra commonly in the lumbosacral region.
SPINA BIFIDA OCCULTA
Spina bifida occulta is due to failure of the neural arches to unite posterior. There is
no protrusion of the cord membranes is noticed. This is suspected by the presence of a
cicatrial thickening or dimple or tuft of hair or dilated vessel or a fibro fatty tumor or
a naevo lipoma over the bony deficiency. A fibrous band, the membrena reunions
connect the skin to the spinal theca. As soon as the child grows older the theca is
pulled by the membrane reunions and symptoms like back ache, aneuresis, foot drop,
weakness of the lower limbs and even paralysis may appear. A few cases remain
symptom less and diagnosed by X-ray taken for some other purposes.
2) MENINGOCELE
This condition is due to the protrusion of meninges through the defective spine. It
contains C.S.F.
3) MENINGO-MYOCELE
In this, addition to protrusion of the membrane, normal spinal cord and cauda- equina
lies within the sac, may be adherent to posterior aspect of the sac. This condition
is quite common in living children and is differentiated from meningocele by presence
of dark shadows of the cord or nerves or transillumination.
4) SYRINGO-MYOCELE
In this condition the central canal of the spinal cord becomes dilated and lies within
Page: 58
Disease Review
the sac and becomes adherent to the posterior wall.
5) MYOCELE
Myocele is most common. The spinal cord opens out and leakage of C.S.F.
continuously. It is incompatible with life.
II. DEFORMITIES OF THE SPINE83
1) Scoliosis
2) Kyphosis
3) Lordosis
1) SCOLIOSIS
It means deviation of the spine to one side. Slight deviation is expected during
fracture or injury to the spine.
TYPES:
A. Mobile scoliosis
B. Structural scoliosis
A. Mobile scoliosis
It is a transient and the vertebrae are not rotated. Again 3 types are noticed in this.
i. Postural:
This is seen particularly in adolescent girls. The curve in mild and convex to left
diagnosing feature is that when patient bends forward it straightens fully.
ii. Compensatory:
It is seen in patients with unilateral short leg, ocular disorder, torticolis etc. in cases of
short leg, the diagnosis is done by asking the patient to sit. The curvature disappears
during sitting position.
iii. Sciatic scoliosis:
Usually in patients with sciatica and lumbar disc prolapse, the clinical feature of the
Page: 59
Disease Review
underlying cause will manifest.
B. Structural scoliosis
It is always associated with rotation of the vertebrae. The bodies rotate towards the
concavity. Once the deformity is developed, it is liable to be increased when the
growth of the patient stops completely.
The causes for this are-
i. Congenital like hemi vertebrae, fused vertebrae, fused ribs, absent disc
ii. Paralytic scoliosis- it is due to paralysis from poliomyelitis, cerebral palsy, and
muscular dystrophy. About 1/3rd of the patients suffering from neurofibromatosis
develop scoliosis.
2) KYPHOSIS
Excessive posterior convexity of the thoracic spine is defined as kyphosis.
a. Postural kyphosis-
It is associated with defects of flat foot, women after child birth, or obesity.
b. Compensatory kyphosis-
Is seen in lumbar lordosis, congenital dislocation hip or fixed flexion deformity of the
hip.
c. Senile kyphosis-
Senile kyphosis is seen in elderly people. Degeneration of disc produces increasing
stoop characteristic of the aged. The disc space is narrowed and the vertebrae slightly
wedged. There is hardly any pain unless Osteoarthritis is present.
3) LORDOSIS
This is an increased anterior curvature of lumbar spine. It may be postural or
congenital dislocation of hip. Tuberculosis of hip and mal-united fracture of the femur
may lead to this condition. This deformity also develops to correct the centre of
Page: 60
Disease Review
gravity of the body in case of last trimester of pregnancy, large uterine fibroid or fatty
abdomen.
III. ANKYLOSING SPONDILITIS85
It is an autoimmune disease with a definite genetic background. Prostitis probably
plays a part. The pathology is that the intra vertebral disc is first replaced by vascular
connective tissue and then undergoes ossification affecting the periphery of the
annulus fibrosus and the intra vertebral ligaments. The disease often starts around the
sacro iliac joints. Pain and stiffness of lumbar spine and the buttocks are the main
presenting complaint. Occasionally pain may mimic sciatica. The onset is insidious
and only noticed during getting up form the bed. Malaise, fatigue, and loss of weight
are the general symptoms. Usually men are affected more in age group of 15- 35 yrs.
IV. SPONDYLOLISTHESIS86
The anterior slippage of one vertebra on to the next lower vertebra due to
degenerative changes in the facet joints and / or inter vertebral disc at the same level.
i. Epidemiology
a. 10% of women over the age 60 yrs have a first or second degree slip
b. L4-L5 most common followed by L3-L4.
c. 5 times more in women over 40 yrs of age.
ii. Clinical features:
a. Primarily low backache due to facet arthrosis.
b. Progression may lead to symptoms of spinal canal stenosis due to neural
compression at the level of slippage.
c. Leg pain may be primary complaint in 40 % characterized by pseudo claudication.
iii. Treatment
a. Non- surgical exercise programs such as flexion exercise, aerobic conditioning.
Page: 61
Disease Review
b. Bracing- intermittently to control symptoms during exacerbations.
c. Medicines- NSAID’s and analgesics for short duration.
d. Facet joint epidural blocks may give symptomatic relief of unknown long-term
efficacy.
iv. Surgical:
a. Needed approximately 10 -15 %
b. Patients presenting neurology complaints do better than low back ache patients.
V. NEOPLASTIC CONDITIONS OF SPINE87
Metastases lesions are much more common than primary spine tumors in the elderly.
In patients of age over 21 yrs, 70 % of primary spinal neoplasms are malignant.
1) PRIMARY TUMORS:
In this most consistent complaints are back pain and patient tends to be progressive,
unrelenting, unrelated to activity. 40 % of patients present with weakness.
a. Benign tumors:
Is less common in the elderly and hemangioma is the most common type, it occurs in
10% of all people rarely symptomatic. The other primary tumors include-
osteochondroma, osteoblastoma, giant cell tumor and aneurismal bone cyst.
b.Malignant tumors
Multiple myeloma and plasma cytoma are usually seen. The patients of plasma
cytoma may have prolonged survival despite eventual progression. Solitary plasma
cytoma of the spine has approximately 60 % .5 year disease free survival rate and the
treatment for solitary cytoma is irradiation and surgery reserved for only retracting
cases.
c. Chondroma
It is rarely present and usually 50 to 60 age group. The most common sites are sub
Page: 62
Disease Review
occipital and sacro coccygeal regions of spine. Surgical extirpation with wide margins
is the only curative procedure.
2) METASTAIC TUMORS:
Axial skeleton is the 3rd common site after lungs and liver. Lumbar spine is most
common area in the spine. In this most common symptom is backache. The most
common tumor metastasis to spine is breast followed by lung, prostrate, G.I. tract and
the kidney.
Treatment
1. Radiation and chemotherapy
2. Surgery is reserved for specific cases like non-radiosensitive tumor, progressive
neurological deficit while under going radiation, patients with limited life span- to
reduce pain or stabilize the spine.
VI. INFLAMMATORY CONDITIONS88
Pott’s disease
This is the most common disease that affects spine in India. It usually attacks the
children and young adults. In prodromal stage, there are weight losses, evening raise
of temperature, and pain usually being the main complaint. It is slight in the beginning
and dull aching in the night. It becomes worse during walking or movement. Two
common complications are cold abscess and paraplegia. If the disease affects the
lumbar spine, the pain usually is localized in the area, but may be referred to lateral
aspect of thigh. There will be limitations to movements, and the deformity is minimal.
Abscess formation is mainly in the form of ilio psoas abscess, which burrow into the
thigh and the inguinal ligament or the pelvis and the perineum where fistula forms on
bursting. Nervous symptoms are rare as spinal canal is spacious. Pott’s paraplegia is
due the compression soft inflammatory material or by a bony sequestrum.
Page: 63
Disease Review
Treatment
1. Anti tubercular treatment
2. Antibiotics
VII. ACUTE OSTEOMYELITIS OF THE SPINE89
It is very rare and characterized by sudden onset of fever and severe local pain. There
are hardly any collapses of the affected vertebra owing to early recumbence of the
patient. In late cases there will be pyogenic abscess not cold abscess.
VIII. MALLINGERS LOW BACK ACHE90
No organic cause, but that the patient complains of pain, usually due to psychological
disturbances and anxiety states.
IX. SPINAL STENOSIS91
No universally accepted definition is present. Generally it is defined as less than 100
mm3 of area within the dura available in the neural canal. Confirmation is by MRI,
which gives evidence of compression of cauda equina. It usually affects the
population of age more than 65 years.
i) Clinical features:
1. Pseudo claudication or neurogenic claudication provoked by standing or walking.
2. Description of pain, numbness, weakness.
3. Symptoms in bilateral legs, along with back ache.
4. Ankle reflexes are reduced or absent.
5. Knee reflexes are reduced or absent.
6. Muscle weakness
7. Extended posture in lumbar spine exacerbates symptoms.
8. Symptoms may wax and wane in intensity.
Page: 64
Disease Review
ii) Treatment:
a. Lumbar flexion exercises.
b. Epidural cortisone-symptomatic relief.
c. Calcitonin-to reduce symptoms.
iii) Surgical:
Lumbar laminectomy
If it is due to instability concomitant fusion is necessary.
X. PAGET’S DISEASE92
It is a disease characterized by excessive and abnormal remodeling of bone.
Aggressive bone resorption followed by excessive and disorganized bone formation
leading to dense sclerotic but weak bone.
i. Clinical Features:
a. Increased frequency with age
b. Presents local pain & tenderness.
c. May lead to pathological fractures, which results in pain.
d. Neuromuscular complaints are normal- like weakness; paralysis & incontinence
may result from enlargement of involved vertebrae causing spinal stenosis or fracture
of vertebra.
ii. Treatment:
a. Calsitonin 1.5-2 I.U/Kg/day
b. Diphosphonates 20mg/kg/day for 1month.
XI. DISC HERNIATION93:
The incidence of disc herniation is higher in individual of 30-40years old. More than
95% disc herniations occur at L4-L5 or L5-S1 area. In this 75% of disc herniation
resolves spontaneously. There will be recurrent attacks of back pain occur first later
Page: 65
Disease Review
on the frequency increases with greater intensity and duration. Pain and paresthesia
begin radiates to legs, further back pain becomes less severe and leg pain progresses.
These symptoms that are severe back pain and leg pain may occur without
documentation of disc herniation on imaging. Prevalence of disc bulges increases with
age. Approximately 5-10%of patients with sciatica (persistent) require surgery.
Spontaneous recovery occurs in not only leg pain but also strength and sensory signs.
Although invasive treatments may accelerate resolution of and surgery may provide
more rapid pain relief. The majority of surgery is done for patients who have failed
conservative line of management.
XII. CAUDA EQUINA SYNDROME94
Incidence is<1% of patients, with lumbar spine. It usually occurs due to extrinsic
pressure on cauda equina by massive herniated nucleus pulposus.Other causes are
epidural abscess, epidural tumor, epidural haematoma and trauma.
Symptoms and signs:
Lumbar spine pain, B/L motor or sensory changes saddle anesthesia, bowel or bladder
dysfunction.
Management:
Surgical decompression may arrest further neurological progression.
XIII. ARTICULAR DYSFUNCTION OF SACROILIAC JOINT:
In this condition movement abnormality of one pelvic bone on other because of
increase or decrease in joint mobility. The exact patho-physiology is unknown.
Possible factors are
1. Inflammation
2. Capsular or ligamentous strain
Page: 66
Disease Review
3. Compression
4. Trauma
5. Hyper or hypo mobility.
Clinical features
Acute onset of pain while lifting heavy weights, pain refers to buttocks, groin and
lower extremities.
Management:
Medications- NSAID, physiotherapy-traction, bracing-sacro iliac joint belts.
XIV. BERTOLOTTI’S SYNDROME.
Pseudo articulation of L5 transverse process to sacrum, pain is rarely present.
Management:
A. Manual therapy methods processes
B. Analgesics
C. Surgery-resection if medicines fails.
Page: 67
Disease Review
UPASHAYA, ANUPASHAYA AND SADHYAASADHYATA
Upashaya are the medicines, diets and regimens, which bring about happiness
either by acting directly against the cause of the disease or it may produce such effect
on the disease indirectly. Upashaya is rightly called as exploratory therapy.
When identical symptoms having two or more disease are meeting hostilely
(or encountered) in such conditions, disease could be best differentiated by adopting
Upashaya.Upashaya for katigraha has not been mentioned particularly. How ever the
Nidana mentioned for Vatavyadhi, can be considered as Anupashaya.
It is essential to know the Sadhyasaadhyata of a disease before the treatment.
Caraka says, “A physician who can distinguish between curable and incurable
diseases and initiate treatment in time with the full knowledge about the various
aspects of the therapeutics can certainly accomplish his object of curing the disease.95
The Sadhyaasadhyata depends upon the severity of the condition, intensity of
etiological factors, extent of damage and other associated conditions. Though the
prognosis of Katigraha has not been separately mentioned, it can be assessed on
general rule of prognosis of Vatavyadhi. The disorders of Vata have been termed as
MahaGadha and the condition, which are associated with Kunjana, Sandhichuti,
Kubjata, Amsasamshosha, Panguta, and Stambha and if Doshas are deep seated in
Asthi and Majja then they are amendable to intensive appropriate treatment or even
sometimes becomes incurable. It is further stated that when the patient has sufficient
strength and without any complications and if the disease is treated in earlier stage,
then it can be cured96. Sushruta considers the Vatavyadhi as Mahagada due to its
tendency to be fatal or incurable. Vaagbhata calls it as Mahaaroga. Most of the
Aacaaryas has told that Vatavyaadhi, generally are very difficult to cure.97, 98
Page: 68
Disease Review
Sushruta mentions that a patient of Vatavyaadhi, if develops the complications
like Shoona (oedema/inflammation) Suptatvaca (Tactile senselessness), Bhagna
(fracture), Kampa (tremors) Aadhmaana (distension of abdomen with tenderness) and
pain in internal organs, then he does not survive.99
CHIKITSA
Katigraha one of the Vatavyadhi is produced by the vitiated vata stemming out
from the pakvashaya, localizing in the Kati pradesha, afflicts the Asthi Dhaatu, and
vitiates the Snayu and Kandara of the Kati pradesha. The resultant condition is
characterized by pain and stiffness of the Katipradesha. It is difficult to unify an
effective treatment for this, as the involvement of aama cannot be ruled out. In cases
of Katigraha due to Shuddha vata, usually Kshaya in Shleshaka Kapha is found which
leads to the stiffness of the joint. Therefore, the procedures aiming at the rectification
of the imbalances in Vata Dosha as well as Kapha Dosha if associated forms the sheet
anchor of treatment of Katigraha.
The general principles of treatment of Vata Dosha should be adopted in cases
of Katigraha after the assessment of Dooshya, Prakruti, Vaya, Linga, Bala, Satwa,
Satmya. The treatment of Katigraha includes various measures to suit its varied
clinical entities, stages and associated complaints. The treatment also constitutes the
Aahara, Vihara, Shodhana, Samana and surgical measures. The specific Nidanas of
the diseases must be identified and efforts must be made for its Parivarjana. The
etiological factors mentioned previously pertaining to Aahara Vihara etc are to be
avoided with special reference to the identification of the actual cause of the patient’s
present condition. After reviewing the classics, it is ideal to start the management with
general principles of Vatahara therapies.
Page: 69
Disease Review
With the due consideration of this, following principles of treatment can be
advocated.
1. Snehana - Oleation therapy
2. Svedana - Sudation therapy
3. Virecana Karma - Therapeutic purgation.
4. Basti - Therapeutic enema.
5. Vatahara Chikitsa - Elimination of vitiated Vata Dosha.
6. Vedanaashaamaka Chikitsa - To pacify the severity of pain.
7. Yogaasana and various Therapeutic spinal exercises.
Apart from this, various external measures are also advised for subsiding the
vitiated vata.
SNEHANA:
Snehana or oleation therapy can be used externally (Bahya) and internally
(Abhyantara) in case Katigraha . Bahya snehana can be performed in the form of
Snehadhara, Abhyanga, Avagaha, Parisheka, Kativasthi etc. Sushruta states that
Sneha applied externally will reach the Majja Dhatu in 900 Matrakalas100. This proves
the mode of action of bahya snehana in Katigraha.
Snehapana can be adopted in Katigraha except in conditions of Ama, AvritaVata,
Ajeerna, Aruchi etc. In case of associated Ama or Kapha Dosha, Langhana and
Pachana are the first line of treatment preceding Snehapana to facilitate the
Niramaavasta. Both Ghruta paana and Taila paana can be effectively adopted
according to the conditions after attaining Niraamavastha.
SWEDANA:
After achievement of proper Snehana, Swedana karma must be adopted.
Page: 70
Disease Review
Svedana helps in the liquification of the Doshas there by assisting in clearing the
Srotas. Among the different forms of Sweda procedures, Avagaha Sweda, Pizhichil,
Naadi Sweda, Patrapinda Sweda, Pinda Sweda, and Upanaaha Sweda may be
performed efficiently in Katigraha. Swedana may be done in entire body or in affected
part of the body like kati, Prushta etc alone. Swedana is also useful in relieving
stiffness in Prushta and Kati pradesha.
MRIDU SAMSHODHANA
VIRECANA:
Virecana has an important role in Katigraha. The action of Virecana is not only
limited to particular site but has effects on the whole body. In Vatavyadhi most of the
authors mentioned Mridu Virecana.101
VriddhaVagbhata specifies that Virecana must be employed in Vata disorders
that are not subsided by Snehana and Swedana. Oral administration of ‘Eranda Sneha’
along with milk is ideal for the Virecana purpose102. This will help in both Vata
Anulomana as well as smooth excretion of Mala. The Sneha Virecana clears
obstruction in the Srotas and relieves Vata vitiation very quickly103. Thus Sneha
Virecana of Mridu nature helps in controlling Shoola in katigraha..
BASTI:
Basti is said to be the Pradhana Chikitsa for Vata Rogas because it immediately
enters into Pakwashaya and corrects the root of vitiated Vata Dosha dwelling in other
parts of the body. Further Basti Chikitsa has been glorified as ‘Ardha Chikitsa’ or
Poorna Chikitsa of Vata.104
Sushruta stressed that the disorders of Vata either Sarvanga or Ekanga can be
corrected by Basti alone. Basti has various effects on body like increase of strength,
complexion, restoration and equilibrium of Dosha Dhatu and Malas. It is useful in
Page: 71
Disease Review
almost all Vata Rogas and relieves stiffness and contractures. Vangasena advised
sodhana and administration of basti 105. Vangasena in Bastikarmaadhikara has quoted
Vaitarana Basti, which is useful in KatiShula, Uru Shula, Prushta Shula, Shotha, and
other Vataja disorders.
By these facts, Basti is most important among the Pan`cakarma in the treatment
Katigraha. No other Chikitsa has the capacity to pacify and regulate the force of Vata
apart from Basti.106
VEDANASHAMAKA CHIKITSA:
Though this classification is not mentioned in any of the treatises, we can see many
Vedanashamaka combinations prescribed for Katigraha in the recent texts. These
combinations probably contain Kupilu, or Guggulu. As pain is one of the cardinal
symptoms in Katigraha these medications may be effectively prescribed as
Lakshanika Chikitsa.
VATAHARA CHIKITSA:
As mentioned earlier Vatahara Chikitsa is the primary line of treatment in Katigraha.
It includes both Shamana and Shodhana procedures. This can be adopted as the
unique principle of treatment in Katigraha.
YOGAASANA:
- The yoga exercises are the most effective and acclaimed as the best suitable
for both prevention and management of low backache.
- Spinal exercises play a vital part in the relief of chronic low back pain and in
the prevention of back injuries.
EXTERNAL MEASURES:
Page: 72
Disease Review
Several types of external measures that are effective in Vatavyadhi are
mentioned in the form of Snehana and Swedana. These measures can relieve the pain
in cases of Katigraha. To relieve the symptoms of affected parts of the body like
Stabdata (rigidity), Graha (stiffness), these external measures are effective.
These external measures include Snehabhyanga, Sweda, Upanaha, Parisheka,
Pradeha, Avagaha, Upavestana, Mardana etc and the measures like Annalepa with
Tailas and other preparations, Dhaara, pindasweda, kayaseka etc.
SNEHAS:
TAILAS:
There is no medicine more superior to Taila in alleviating the Vata. Taila processed
with Vatahara drugs due to its Ushna, Vyavayi, Gurugunas will alleviate the Vata
disorders sited in subtle Srotas.
Tailas in general can be used for Pana, Abhyanga, Nasya and Basti. It is said that the
Bala also is improved by the use of Tailas. Almost all the usual Vatahara Tailas
alleviate Vedana.
Some of the Tailas used are
1. Rasona Taila (Cakradatta)
2. Moolaka Taila
3. Nirgundi Taila
4. Karpasasthyadi Taila
5. Vrushamooladi Taila
6. AnuTaila (Sushruta)
7. Lasuna Taila
8. Narayana Taila (Cakradatta)
9. Mahanarayana Taila
Page: 73
Disease Review
10. Vajigandhadi Taila (Y R)
11. Masha Taila (Cakradatta)
12. Swadanstradi Taila (V S)
13. Kubja prasaarini Taila
14. Vishagarbha Taila (Vaidya Chintamani)
15. Shatavari Taila (Sharangadara Samhita)
16. Nakula Taila (Bhaishajya Ratnavali)
GHRITAS AND OTHER SNEHAS
1. Dashamooladi Ghrita
2. Dashamooladi Majjasneha
3. Triphaladi Chatursneha
4. Vidarigandhadi Ghrita (Sushruta)
5. Bhadradharvadi Sneha (Sushruta)
6. Ashwagandhadi Ghrita (Sushruta)
7. Chagalyadi Ghrita (S S)
8. Panchatikta Ghrita (Y R)
9. Rasnadi Ghrita (R R S)
SAMANA CIKITSA:
Several preparations are enlisted in classical texts. There are different type of
preparations like Choorna, Kwatha, Arishta, Ghrita, Taila, Lepa, Vati, and Guggulu
Kalpas. Some of the examples include Maharasnadi Kwatha, Rasna Saptaka Kwatha,
Sahacharaadi Kwatha, Shephalika Kwatha, Narasimha Choorna, Guggulu Tikta
Ghrita, Bala Taila, Dhanvantari Taila, Yogaraj Guggulu, Amrita Guggulu,
Page: 74
Disease Review
Lasunapaka, Vaatavidhvamsa Rasa, Kubja Vinoda rasa and BrihatVaatachintamani
Rasa.
KATI BASTI
Swedana:
The process wherein Stambha, Gaurava, Seeta are relieved and
which induces Sweda is known as Swedana Karma.107 Generally, Guru, Ushna
Dravyas induce Swedana and the drugs having exactly opposite qualities like Laghu,
Mandha, Tikshna Gunas causes stiffness of the body. 108
Kati Basti:
This procedure is unique, in the sense comprising both Snehana and Swedana
or it may be put like this ‘Snehayukta Sweda’. The Basti, which is performed in the
kati Pradesha, is Kati Basti. Sus’ruta has mentioned the Vistarapramana of Kati has
Astadashaangula i, e 18 Angula. The word Basti is having the meaning of “Vas
Nivase” “Vas Aachhadane” “Vas Surabhikarane”. Here the word “Vas Aachhadane”
holds good for Kati Basti. The word meaning is “to cover” “that which surrounds” or
“Aavaranam”109. Hence, “Dharana” or maintainence of certain substances in the Kati
Pradesha for a stipulated time may be considered as Basti.
The word ‘Vas Nivase’ means “to reside”. Specifically this holds good for
Niruha, Anuvasana, or Uttara Basti. However, in case of Kati Basti when oil is
retained it may also be considered for the definition. So here, Kati Basti where the oil
is retained for stipulated period is not a misinterpretation.
Page: 75
Disease Review
In this procedure, oil is used for the purpose of treatment. Hence, this may be
considered from the point of Drava Sweda.
Types of Swedana according to Sushruta110 and Vagbhata 111
1. Taapa
2. Ushma
3. Upanaaha
4. Drava
In case of Caraka Samhita Sankara , Prastara , Pariseka etc 13
types of Sweda are enlisted112 . Keeping the above said in the mind it may be viewed
that Kati Basti is one among the Drava Sweda. Simultaneously it may also be viewed
from the point of Pariseka and Avagaha because Vridha Vagbhata opines Drava
Sweda is of 2 varities i,e Pariseka and Avagaha 113. However, when they are viewing
about Pariseka they considered sprinkling (Sinchana) of medicaments and for
Avagaha, immersions are considered. In case of the Kati Basti immersion /covering
of the Kati region with oil may be forcing us to consider this variety as Avagaha
Sweda. When the oil is going to be changed during the procedure of Kati Basti little
sprinkling may be observed though it is local. Hence, variety of Pariseka may also be
considered. While dealing with the Drava Sweda Cakradatta mentioned it is useful in
case of Vataja disorders or Pittayukta and Kaphayukta Vataja disorders 114 and in
Bhavaprakasha While dealing with Swedana Taila, Kwatha, Ksheera, Mamsarasa on
to be and for Drava Sweda 115 .
Where stands Kati Basti?
According to different types of classifications, Kati Basti may
be put under following groups:
I According to Agni Bheda it is: Saagni sweda
Page: 76
Disease Review
II. According to Sthaana Bheda : Ekaanga Sweda
III. According to Guna Bheda : Snigdha Sweda
IV. According to Roga And Rogi Bala : Madhyama Sweda
V. According to Taapaadi 4 Bhedas : Drava Sweda
VI. According to Sankaraadi 13 types : Parisheka / Avagaaha
VII. According to Samshamana and Samshodhanaangabhoota Bheda :
Samshamaneeya Sweda.
According to Hareeta , there are 7 types of Sweda 116.
1. Loshta
2. Bashpa
3. Agni
4. Ghata
5. Jala
6. Phala
7. Vaaluka
Kati Basti may be considered under Jala Sweda though literal meaning of Jala is
water because of proximity with liquid nature of Jala Kati Basti may be considered as
Jala Sweda.
According to Kashyapa (8 types) it may be viewed under
Avagaha and Pariseka Sweda.
According to Bhela (8 types) Jala Sweda is the source for Kati
Basti
Utilitarian factor:
Page: 77
Disease Review
While defining Swedana it has been said that Stambha,
Gaurava, Seeta are going to be reduced and it induces Swedana. Kati Basti also does
the same thing off course in reduced intensity.
While dealing with the Samyak Sweda Lakshanas 117 and uses of Swedana certain
things are quoted 118, 119. All of them are not exactly fitting into the context of Kati
Basti. Few of them may be summarized as below.
1. Induces Twak MardaVata and Twak Prasaadana.
2. Restoration of functions of Sandhi by removing Stambha.
3. Reduces Gaurava and Tandra.
4. Reduces Seeta quality locally.
5. Induces Swedana locally.
Among Samyak and Asamyak Sweda Lakshanas following may be attributed to Kati Basti.
Samyak:
Shula Uparama
Seeta Uparama
Stambha Nigraha
Gaurava Nigraha
Mardhava
Sweda Srava
Vyadhiharatwa
Laghutwa
Ati Sweda :
Pitta Prakopa
Ati Sweda
Asamyak:
Page: 78
Disease Review
No Shula Uparama
Feeling of coldness
Stambha
Gaurava
Procedure of Katibasti:
Poorva Karma:
The patient was advised to avoid Vatakara Aahara and Vihara. The
Taila was made into lukewarm indirectly by placing it in a vessel containing water.
Oushadha:
Katigrahantaka Taila
Upakarana:
Table, vessels, spoon, gas stove, wheat floor, cotton, water.
Pradhana Karma:
The procedure was explained in brief to the patient. The patient was
made to lie prone on the table and Kati Pradesha is exposed. Meanwhile sufficient
quantity of wheat floor was taken and made into dough by adding required quantity of
water. The dough was made into a shape of circular ring corresponding to the area of
tenderness in the lumbo-sacral region. The inner and outer walls of the circular ring
were properly sealed over the skin to prevent the leakage of the Taila from the circular
ring. Then the heated Taila was poured in little amount to check the tolerance of heat
by the patient. According to the tolerance of the lukewarm oil, it is slowly poured
inside the circular ring with a help of a spoon. Constant temperature of the oil was
Page: 79
Disease Review
maintained inside the circular ring by rotating the oil with a finger. Once the
temperature of the oil is decreased, it was replaced with lukewarm oil again. The
procedure was continued until the patient attains Samyak Swinna Lakshanas or upto
40 to 50 minutes. The same procedure was repeated for 21 days. Once used oil was
reused for consequent 3 days. On 4th day, the oil was replaced with fresh oil.
Paschat Karma:
After the procedure, oil was completely removed out from the circular
ring with the help of a cotton or spoon. The dough ring was also removed from the
back. Mild massage over the area was done. Then the patient was advised to take
lukewarm water bath after 15 to 20 minutes.
MANAGEMENT OF LOW BACK ACHE120
Radical treatment of the Low back ache is planned with the due
consideration of the etiology of the illness. Relieving the pain and other discomfort by
different measures should not be the sole purpose of the treatment. Key principles
include:
1) Prevention
"Prevention is better than cure," it is told in classics, in this study preventive
measures are very essential things, some different posture are mentioned here.
In sitting posture:
- To maintain the good sitting posture.
- To Avoid a long time sitting posture.
- Change in position for every 15 minutes.
Page: 80
Disease Review
- A seat placed at a height from the ground that is slightly less than the length
of the leg from knee to foot.
- The lumbar spine can be kept in contact with the squab support at the back of
the chair.
In standing posture:
- To avoid asymmetrical standing
- Keep knees relaxed on comfortably straight position.
In lying posture:
- The side lying position is generally a safe and comfortable posture for sleeping
- To maintain the proper position to getting out of bed
- Keep the spine in a neutral position
During work:
- Avoid forward bending while working.
- Do not wear the high heel shoes.
- Use of better techniques while lifting.
Other major points in prevention are weight reduction and avoidance of any unusual
activity that can hurt the back. Correct sitting, standing and sleeping postures, lessen
the intradiscal pressure. Keep trunk muscles in optimal condition by regular exercise
such as brisk walking, swimming etc.
2) Non-operative treatment
Heat and Cold - In the acute patient, the application of therapeutic heat and
cold usually precedes traction or exercise. Modalities include the use of hydro collator
packs, whirlpool, diathermy, ultrasound and phonophoresis.
Page: 81
Disease Review
Traction- the mechanical benefit of traction is to decrease the lordosis of the lumbar
spine. It can be applied in a sustained manner or intermittent manner.
Bed rest and manipulation – It is the centrepiece of non-operative treatment of
Lumbar disc herniation. An adequate period of bed rest is of at least 2 weeks. A firm
resting surface is important. Any comfortable position can be assumed but resting in
prone, because of the associated hyperextension, is discouraged. After the proposed
period the patient is gradually mobilized but should return to bed if the pain
reappears.
3) Drug therapy
more frequently used medications include non steroidal anti inflammatory drugs and
acetaminophen. Muscle relaxants are another class of drugs that are frequently used.
Anti depressants and anti neuralgic agents are useful for patients with radiating painof
a burning quality that typifies neural origin.
4) Surgical interventions
- If not relieved by conservative treatment.
- Quick recurrence of symptom.
- Evidence of large prolapse causing pressure on cauda equina.
- Surgical options include – Laminectomy (removal of lamina), discectomy
(removal of herniated disc), facetectomy (removal of facet joint), (widening of
foramen) foraminostomy.
Selective injection treatment for backache
They are based on principles of regional anesthesia. Lidocaine is the
most widely used agent in the concentration of 0.5 – 2%. Onset of action is 1-5
Page: 82
Disease Review
minutes and duration is 1-2 hrs. Bupivacaine has slower onset of action 5- 20 min but
provides longer pain relief.
Cortico steroids are injected locally to relieve inflammation and pain.
Steroids can be injected to epidural space or into the desired foramen under
fluoroscopy.
PATHYA – APATHYA
The diet and regimen that is congenial to the health both in healthy and
diseased are referred by the name Pathya. Quite opposite to this the food and regimen
that are otherwise is named as Apathya. Pathya and Apathya in regards to the
Vatavyaadhi in general is also considered as Pathya and Apathya of Katigraha as
elaborated in Yogaratnaakara (Y.R) and in Basavarajeeyam.121, 122
Table No: 3 PATHYA:
I. Ahaara Y.R B.R.
Rasa: Lavana -
Shooka Dhanya Varga: Godhooma, Godhooma
Raktashaali Puranadhaanya
Shami Dhanya Varga: Masha Masha
Kulattha Kulattha
Maamsa Varga: Kukkut’a
Tittiri
Barhi (Peacock) -
Chataka
Page: 83
Disease Review
Jaangalamaamsa
Matsya Varga: Shileendhra
Parvata
Nakra -
Gagrara
Khudisha
Jhasha
Shaakha Varga: Patola, Kooshmanda,
Kaaravellaka
Shigru Moolaka, Tikta, Patola
Vaartaaka,
Soorana, Tarkkari
Phala Varga: Dadima
Parooshaka
Badara -
Draksha
Gorasa Varga: Ghruta, Dugdha
Kilaata, Dadhi koorcika -
Sneha Varga: - Taila
Anya Dravya : Lashuna, Bruhati,Vaastuka,
Tamboola Kasamarda,
Dunduka, Mishi, Kataka
Matsyandika, Punarnava
Vatsaka, Mundi, Jeeraka
II. Karma Y.R. B.R.
- -
Abhyanga
APATHYA:
I. Ahara Y.R B.R.
Rasa: Kashaaya, Tikta, Katu -
Anna: Anashana Guru & Abhishayandi
Page: 84
Disease Review
Jala Varga: Tataaka and Tatinijala Sheetaambu
Pradushta (jala) salila
Shookadhanya Varga: - Navadhaanya
Shameedhanya: Mudga, Mudgaka
Nivara, Shyamakacoorna Sarshapa
(Kangani) Kuruvinda Nishapava
Kalaaya
Chanaka
Shakha Varga: - Shakala, Kanda, Trapu
Alaabu, Ervaaru, Bimba
Koshataki Dravya
Kareera Kareera
Anya Dravyas Kshaudra Mrinali, Sharasinimba
Tikta, Nimba
II. Vihara
Chinta, Prajagara Sheeta pavana sevana
Vegavidharana
Shrama, Vyavaya
Chankramana
khatwa (sleeping on cot)
III. Karma
Chardi, Langhana
Page: 85
Drug Review
DRUG REVIEW
Therapeutic effect of any drug combination, to the benefit of the patients, suffering
from Katigraha depends upon its ability to pacify the Vata, placate the cardinal
symptoms and breaking the Sampraapthi. Katigraha is a disease where pain is seen
predominantly along with stiffness of the low back region.
Among the various kashayas mentioned as vata shamaka in sahasrayoga, Nirgundi
Erandaadi Kashaaya is also mentioned. If we go through the properties of the
individual drugs used in this kashaya, we can see that all of them have a specific
action for alleviation of Vata dosha.
In addition to general Shamanaushadhi’s, special attention is necessary to subdue the
presenting clinical features in the form of external measures. Taila is considered
superior to allevate Vaata Dosha due to its Snigdha and Ushna properties. Hence,
Katibasti with Katigrahantaka Taila is adopted in this study. This taila had been in use
by traditional practioners of kerala for katigraha and other vatavyadhis. In the
following lines, the details of the drugs used in Nirgundi Erandadi Kashaya and
Katigrahantaka Taila are given. This will justify the therapeutic utility of the drugs
administered orally and as external measures in patients of Katigraha.
The main objective of the present clinical study is to evaluate the effect of Nirgundi
Erandadi Kashaya and Katibasti with Katigrahantaka Taila in the management of
Katigraha. The properties of these drugs are summarized below.
Page: 86
Drug Review
A) NIRGUNDI ERANDADI KASHAYA123
CONTENTS :
Name of the drug Latin name Quantity
1) Nirgundi Vitex negundo
2) Eranda Ricinus communis
3) Sahachara Barleria prionitis 1 part each
4) Bala Sida Rhombifolia
5) Shunthi Zingiber officinale
6) Water 16 parts
Preparation of Nirgundi Erandadi Kashaya :
The five different drugs mentioned were collected, cleaned and weighed. These were
made into coarse powder and 16 parts of water was added and boiled until 1/8th of the
water remained. This Kashaya was filtered through a clean cloth, bottled and stored.
PROPERTIES OF INDIVIDUAL DRUGS
NIRGUNDI124
Kula - Nirgundi Family - Verbanaceae Botanical name – Vitex Negundo Gana – Caraka – Vishaghna, Krimighna Susruta – Surasadi gana Properties · Rasa – Katu, Tikta · Guna – Laghu, Rooksha · Virya - Usna
Page: 87
Drug Review
· Vipaaka – Katu· . Dosaghnata - Kapha vaata hara
. Karma – Vedanasthapana, Balya, Srotoshodhaka ERANDA125
Kula - Eranda Family - Euphorbiaceae Botanical name – Ricinus Communis Gana – Caraka – Bhedaneeya, Swedopaga, Angamardaprashamana, Maduraskanda. Susruta – Vidaarigandhaadi, Vaatasamshamana Properties · Rasa – Madhura, Katu, Tikta · Guna – Guru, Snigdha, Teekshna, Sookshma · Virya - Usna · Vipaaka – Madhura · Dosaghnata - Kapha vata hara, Pitta vardhaka.
Taila is Pitta Shamaka.
. Karma – Vedanasthapana, Shulahara, Angamarda prashamana, Balya,Deepana.
SAHACARA126
Kula - Vaasa Family - Acanthaceae Botanical name - Barleria prionitis Properties · Rasa - Tikta, madhura
Page: 88
Drug Review
· Guna - Laghu snigdha · Virya - Usna · Vipaaka - Katu · Dosaghnata - Kapha vaata shamaka . Karma – shothahara, vedana sthapaka, naadi bala prada, jwaraghna, vishaghna, Rakta shodhaka, shukra shodhana BALA127
Kula - Kaarpaasa Family - Malvaceae Botanical name – Sida Rhombifolia Gana – Caraka - Balya, Brumhaneeya, Prajaasthaapana, Madhura skanda. Susruta – Vaatasams’amana Properties · Rasa - Madhura · Guna – Guru, Snigdha, Picchila · Virya – Sheeta · Vipaaka - Madhura · Dosaghnata – Vata pitta shamaka . Karma – Balya, Brumhana, Ojovardhaka, Naadi bala prada, Anulomana, Snehana, Rasaayana. The roots are cooling, astringent, stomachic, nervine and cardiac tonic. SHUNTI128
Kula - Ardraka Family - Zingiberaceae
Page: 89
Drug Review
Botanical name – Zingiber officinale Properties · Rasa - Katu · Guna - Laghu snigdha · Virya - Usna · Vipaaka – Madhura · Dosaghnata - Kapha vata hara . Karma – Shothahara, Vedana sthapaka, Vata shamaka, Naadi Uttejaka. B) KATIGRAHANTAKA TAILA Contents : Name of the drug Latin name 1) Nirgundi Vitex negundo 2) Tila taila Sesamum indicum 3) Shunthi Zingiber officinale 4) Pippali Piper longum 5) Maricha Piper nigrum 6) Hingu Ferula narthex 7) Lashuna Allium sativum Quantity Nirgundi patra swarasa – 60 liters
Tila taila – 30 liters
Trikatu, Hingu, Lashuna – 1.5 kilogram each
Page: 90
Drug Review
Method of preparation:
The above-mentioned drugs were taken in appropriate quantity and kalka was
prepared. To the murchita Tila taila above mentioned quantity of swarasa and kalka
were added. The taila was boiled in mandaagni until snehapaka lakshanas were seen.
The prepared katigrahantaka taila was filtered and stored in sterile glass containers.
PROPERTIES OF INDIVIDUAL DRUGS
NIRGUNDI Kula - Nirgundi Family - Verbanaceae Botanical name – Vitex Negundo Gana – Caraka – Vishaghna, Krimighna Susruta – Surasaadi gana Properties · Rasa – Katu, Tikta · Guna – Laghu, Rooksha · Virya - Usna · Vipaaka – Katu· . Dosaghnata - Kapha vata hara
. Karma – Vedanasthapana, Balya, Srotoshodhaka
HINGU129
Kula – Shatapushpa Family - Umbelliferae Botanical name – Ferula narthex Gana – Caraka – Sagnasthaapaka, Deepaniya, Katukaskanda
Page: 91
Drug Review
Susruta – Pippalyaadi gana, Ooshakaadi gana Properties · Rasa – Katu · Guna – Laghu, Snigdha, Teekshna · Virya - Ushna · Vipaaka – Katu· . Dosaghnata - Kapha vata shamaka
. Karma – Vedanasthapana, Shulaprashamana, vatahara, Nadi uttejaka, sagnasthaapana, Akshepahara.
LASHUNA130
Kula - Rasona Family - Lilliaceae Botanical name – Allium sativum Properties · Rasa – Katu pradhana amla varjita pancharasa · Guna – Snigdha, Teekshna, Picchila, Guru, Sara · Virya - Usna · Vipaaka – Katu· . Dosaghnata - Vaata hara
. Karma – Vedanasthapana, shothahara, Paarshva shula hara, Naadi uthejaka SHUNTI Kula - Ardraka Family - Zingiberaceae Botanical name – Zingiber officinale
Page: 92
Drug Review
Properties · Rasa - Katu · Guna - Laghu snigdha · Virya - Usna · Vipaaka – Madhura · Dosaghnata - Kapha vaata hara . Karma – Shothahara, Vedana sthapaka, Vata shamaka, Nadi Uttejaka.
PIPPALI131
Kula - Pippali Family – Piperaceae Botanical name – Piper longum Gana – Caraka – Kasahara, Hikkanigrahana,shirovirechana, vamana, Truptighna, Deepaniya, Shulaprashamana. Susruta – Pippalyaadi gana, Oordhvabhaagahara, Shirovirechana Properties · Rasa – Tikta, Katu · Guna – Laghu, Snigdha, teekshna · Virya – Anushna sheeta · Vipaaka – Madhura · Dosaghnata - Kapha Vaata hara
. Karma – Vatahara, Rakthashodhaka, Rasayana, Balya
MARICHA132
Kula - Pippali Family – Piperaceae
Page: 93
Drug Review
Botanical name – Piper nigrum Gana – Caraka –Shirovirechana, Deepaniya, Shulaprashamana, Krumighna. Susruta – Pippalyadi gana, Trayooshana Properties · Rasa – Katu · Guna – Laghu, Teekshna · Virya – Ushna · Vipaaka – Katu · Dosaghnata - Vaata Kapha hara
. Karma – Vatahara, Srotoshodhaka, Rakthashodhaka, Rasayana, Naadi uthejaka, Balya, Vatanulomana TILA133
Kula - Tila Family - Pedaliaceae Botanical name – Sesamum indicum Properties · Rasa – Madhura . Anurasa – Kashaaya, Tiktha · Guna – Guru, snigdha · Virya - Usna · Vipaaka – Madhura · Dosaghnata - Vaata hara, Kapha Pitta kopaka
Tridosha shamaka on undergoing samskaara. . Karma – Snehana, Vedana sthapaka, Vata shamaka, Nadi Uttejaka, Sandhaneeya, Vrana shodhana, Vrana ropana
Page: 94
Drug Review
By a thorough study of the properties, we can see that most of the drugs in above
formulations are Vatakaphahara in nature. Some drugs like Eranda, Sahachara and
Trikatu act as Vedanashamaka directly according to Karma. Drugs like Bala is said to
be Rasayana hence act as Dhatu Vrudhikara also. Drugs like Eranda have
Vedanasthapana, Balya and Vatanulomana property that is very essential in breaking
the Samprapti.
In a nutshell, the herbs used in the preparation of
1) Nirgundi Erandadi Kashaya and
2) Katigrahantaka Taila
are efficacious in bring out the relief in signs and symptoms, break the
samprapti and balance the Dhatu Dushti in Katigraha.
Page: 95
Methodology
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Research is defined as scientific and diligent study, investigation or experimentation
in order to establish facts and analyze their significance. Research is done for
establishing new facts, discarding the old or modifying them. Many times research is
done to validate old principles with fresh proofs. Always research need not end with
positive results. In research one problem is constructed with suitable experimental
methods and honest observations are made to arrive at a logic conclusion.
Aim of the study:
The study is related to the evaluation of the therapeutic effect of Nirgundi
Erandadi kashaya and Kativasthi in patients suffering from Katigraha and is designed
with the following objectives.
To evaluate the therapeutic effect of combined application of Nirgundi
Erandadi kashaya and Kativasthi in bringing symptomatic relief in patients of
Katigraha.
To study the role of Nirgundi Erandadi kashaaya and Kativasthi in obtaining
complete relief in patients of Katigraha and its comparison with effect of oral
administration of Diclofenac sodium tablets.
Detailed study of the action of drugs of both groups individually and in
combination.
Detailed study of the disease covering classical and modern literature.
Source of data:
Patients of either sex who attended the outpatient and in patient deparments of
A.L.N.Rao Memorial Ayurvedic medical college, Koppa in the period from
December 2004 to august 2005 complaining of low backache and stiffness were
screened. Out of these 50 patients suffering from Katigraha fulfilling the below
Page: 96
Methodology
mentioned inclusion criteria were taken for the study. The complete profile of the
patient was prepared as per the detail proforma consisting of all the relevant data like
symptamatology, physical signs and patient’s constitution along with elaborate
assessment of pain, using standard questionnaires.
Inclusion criteria:
♦ Patients with Pratyaatma lakshanas of Katigraha
♦ Patients of both sex aged between 16-60 years.
Exclusion criteria:
♦ Patients having associated diseases like Tumors, Diabetes, Tuberculosis,
Fractures, Pelvic disorders and other complications.
♦ Patients having marked deformities of spinal column.
♦ Patients with other systemic disorders.
Investigations:
♦ Routine hematological investigations like Hb%, TC, DC, ESR
♦ RBS and serum Cholesterol if necessary.
♦ Routine Urine investigations.
♦ Routine radiological examination of the Lumbo sacral spine in Anteroposterior
and lateral position.
Design:
It is a single blind clinical study with pre-test and post-test design wherein 50
patients of either sex diagnosed as Katigraha were randomly allocated into trial Group
(Kativasthi and Nirgundierandadi kashaya group) and control Group (Diclofenac
sodium group).
Relevant investigations were adopted for diagnosis and to assess the improvement.
Page: 97
Methodology
Intervention:
Trial Group:
Number of patients – 25
Kativasthi – Katigrahantaka Taila
Duration – 21 days
Oral medicine – Nirgundi erandadi kashaya
Dose – 50 ml B.D. after food
Duration – 21 days
Control Group:
Number of patients – 25
Oral medicine – Diclofenac sodium
Dose – 50 mg B.D. after food
Duration – 21 days
Assessment criteria:
The state of the disease katigraha, changes after the intervention, improvement
or otherwise was determined by adopting standard methods of scoring by means of
objective and subjective parameters. Assessment was done initially before the
intervention and there after every week in both the groups till the completion of
proposed period of treatments. This assessment criterion is detailed in the following
pages.
Page: 98
Methodology
I. Objective criteria
1. Maneuvers conducted are:
a) SLR test
b) Pump handle test
c) Coin test
d) Schober’s Test
i) Flexion
ii) Extension
2. Tenderness
II. Subjective criteria
1. Pain
2. Stiffness
3. Lateral flexion
4. Rotation
METHOD OF GRADING
♦ Straight leg raising test
0 Can lift up to 900
1 Can lift up to 750
2 Can lift up to 500
3 Can lift up to 250
4 Cannot lift
Page: 99
Methodology
♦ Coin test
0 Can bend without difficulty
1 Can bend with difficulty but no support
2 Can bend with difficulty but need support
3 Cannot bend
♦ Pump handle test
0 Can perform the test
1 Can perform the test with difficulty
2 Cannot perform the test
♦ Tenderness
0 No pain
1 Patient says it’s paining
2 Patient winces
3 Patient winces and withdraws the part
4 Patient does not allow to touch the part.
♦ Extension (Schobers test)
0 Extension up to 2.5 cm
1 Extension up to 2 cm
2 Extension up to 1.5 cm
3 Extension < 1 cm
♦ Flexion (Schobers test)
0 Flexion up to 4 cm
1 Flexion up to 3 cm
2 Flexion up to 2 cm
3 Flexion <1 cm
Page: 100
Methodology
♦ Lateral flexion
0 Can do lateral flexion easily
1 Can lateral flex with difficulty
2 Cannot perform lateral flexion.
♦ Rotation
0 Can rotate easily
1 Rotation with difficulty
2 Cannot rotate.
♦ Stiffness
0 None
1 Less than 15 minutes
2 15 to 30 minutes.
4 More than 30 minutes.
♦ Pain 0 No Pain (score 61-66)
1 Mild (score 41-60)
2 Moderate (score 21-40)
3 Severe (score <20)
TOTAL EFFECT
COMPLETE REMISSION – 100% relief in signs and symptoms and movement
by patients without any pain were considered as
complete remission.
Page: 101
Methodology
MARKED IMPROVEMENT – 75 - 99% relief in signs and symptoms were
considered as marked improvement.
MODERATE IMPROVEMENT –50 - 74% relief in signs and symptoms
were considered as moderate improvement.
MILD IMPROVEMENT - 25 – 49% relief in signs and symptoms
Were considered as mild improvement.
UNCHANGED – No reduction in signs and symptoms.
Pain Table no - 4 •Greenough and Fraser scoring method:
Question Answer Points
Never 6
Occasionally 4
Almost every day 2
How often do you have to take pain
killers for your pain?
several times every day 0
Never 6
Rarely 4
1-2 times per month 2
How often do you have consultation
with a doctor?
1-2 times per week 0
full time at regular job 9
full time at a lighter job 6
part time 3 At present, are you working?
not working 0
not at all 6
a little 4
half the day 2
So you need to rest during the day
because of pain?
Over half the day 0
Normally 9
as many as usual, but slowly 6
A few, not as many as usual 3
At present, can you undertake household
chores or additional jobs?
not at all 0
as much as usual 9 At present, can you undertake sports or
active pursuits, such as dancing? almost as much as usual 6
Page: 102
Methodology
Some, much less than usual 3
not at all 0
no effect 3
mildly or moderately affected 2
Difficult 1
How much does back pain affect your
ability to dress?
not possible 0
no effect 3
mildly or moderately affected 2
Difficult 1
How much does back pain affect your
ability to sit?
not possible 0
no effect 3
mildly or moderately affected 2
Difficult 1
How much does back pain affect your
ability to walk?
not possible 0
no effect 3
mildly or moderately affected 2
Difficult 1
How much does back pain affect your
ability to sleep?
not possible 0
no effect 3
mildly or moderately affected 2
Difficult 1
How much does back pain affect your
ability to travel?
not possible 0
no effect 6
mildly or moderately affected 4
Difficult 2
How much does back pain affect your
sex life?
not possible 0
• The higher the score, the better the performance status.
Statistical Analysis:
For assessing the improvement of symptomatic relief and to analyze
statistically the observations were recorded before, after the treatment and after
follow- up. The mean, percentage, S.D, S.E, and t-value (paired t-test) were calculated
from the observation recorded. The total result including the overall effect of therapy
is given in tables for the two groups.
Page: 103
Methodology
OBSERVATIONS:
Table No:5
Age wise distribution of 50 patients of Katigraha :
Age group
in yrs
Trial
group
Control
group
Total Percentage
11 - 20 2 1 3 6
21 - 30 3 4 7 14
31 - 40 9 8 17 34
41 - 50 8 9 17 34
51 - 60 3 3 6 12
Age incidence in this study showed a maximum number of patients in the age group
of 31 – 50 years, i.e. 68%. In the age group of 21 – 30 years 14% of patients were
obtained, and in the age group of 51 – 60 years 12% of patients were recorded.
Minimum numbers of patients were seen from the age group 11 – 20, i.e. 6%.
Graph No: 1
Age wise distribution of 50 patients of Katigraham
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
11 ~ 20 21 - 30 31 - 40 41 - 50 51 - 60
Page: 104
Methodology
Table No:6
Sex wise distribution of 50 patients of Katigraha
Sex Trial
group
Control
group
Total Percentage
Male 16 15 31 62
Female 9 10 19 38
The percentage of males (62%) was seen to be more in this study compared to the
percentage of Females (38%).
Graph No:2
Sex wise distribution of 50 patients of Katigraham
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
MALE FEMALE
Page: 105
Methodology
Table No:7
Religion wise distribution of 50 patients of Katigraha
Religion Trial
group
Control
group
Total Percentage
Hindu 9 10 19 38
Muslim 8 7 15 30
Christian 8 8 16 32
Among the patients selected for the study 38% were Hindus, 30% were Muslims and
32% were Christians.
Graph No:3
Religion wise distribution of 50 patients of Katigraha
05
10152025303540
HINDU CHRISTIAN MUSLIM
Page: 106
Methodology
Table No:8
Occupation wise distribution of 50 patients of Katigraha
Occupation Trial
group
Control group Total percentage
House wife 4 3 7 14
Unemployed 2 3 5 10
Labour 8 7 15 30
Service 4 5 9 18
Business 4 4 8 16
Student 3 3 6 12
More incidence (30%) were seen in patients from the labour category. 18% of patients
were from the service category and16% of patients from the business category.12%
were in student category and 10% were unemployed.
Graph No:4
Occupation wise distribution of 50 patients of Katigraha
0
10
20
30
House wife Unemployed Labour Service Business Student
Page: 107
Methodology
Table No:9
Distribution of 50 patients of Katigraha according to nature of occupation
Occupation Trial
group
Control
group
Total percentage
Standing 8 9 17 34
Sitting 4 3 7 14
Bending 3 2 5 10
Traveling 8 7 15 30
Walking 2 4 6 12
Occupation which involved standing erect for long duration predisposed the patients to strain
of the back. In the present study 34% of the patients had similar occupation. 30% had to travel
in two wheelers etc .as a part of their occupation leading to strain at low back. 14% of patients
had to sit for long duration. 12% had to walk more and 10% had to bend their back more as a
part of their work.
Graph No:5
Distribution of 50 patients of Katgraha according to nature of occupation
05
10
15
20
25
30
35
STANDING SITTING BENDING TRAVEL WALKING
Page: 108
Methodology
Table No:10
Marital status wise distribution of 50 patients of Katigraha
Marital
status
Trial
group
Control
group
Total Percentage
Married 17 16 33 66
Unmarried 7 9 16 32
Widow
and
widower
1 0 1 2
Among the patients 66% were married, 32% were unmarried and 2% of them were
widows.
Graph No:6
Marital state wise distribution of 50 patients of Katigraha
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
MARRIED UNMARRIED WIDOW
Page: 109
Methodology
Table No:11
Socio-economic Status wise distribution of 50 patients of Katigraha
Socio-
economic
status
Trial
group
Control
group
Total Percentage
Lower 13 12 25 50
Middle 8 7 15 30
Upper 4 6 10 20
The study showed more incidences (50%) of the condition in patients hailing from a
lower socio economic conditions owing to the nature of work, condition of living etc.
About 30% of patients were from middle class and only 20% from upper class
suffered from the condition.
Graph No:7
Socio-economic Status wise distribution of 50 patients of Katigraha
0
10
20
30
40
50
UPPER MIDDLE LOWER
Page: 110
Methodology
Table No:12
Dietary pattern of 50 patients of Katigraha
Dietary
pattern
Trial
group
Control
group
Total percentage
Vegetarian 10 11 21 42
Non-Veg 15 14 29 58
Among the patients selected for the study 58% turned out to be non vegetarians and
only 42% of them stuck to vegetarian food.
Graph No:8
Dietary pattern of 50 patients of Katigraha
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
VEGETARIAN NONVEGETARIAN
Page: 111
Methodology
Table No;13
Family history of 50 patients of Katigraha
Family
history
Trial
group
Control
group
Total percentage
Positive 8 9 17 34
Negative 17 16 33 66
Among the patients selected for the study 66% did not had a similar family history.
Only 34% of them had a related family history.
Graph No:9
Family history of 50 patients of Katigraha
010203040506070
POSITIVE NEGATIVE
Page: 112
Methodology
Table No:14
Distribution of 50 patients of Katigraha according to weight
Weight
in kg
Trial
group
Control
group
Total percentage
31 – 40 1 1 2 4
41 - 50 3 3 6 12
51 - 60 4 5 9 18
61 - 70 8 7 15 30
71 - 80 5 6 11 22
81 - 90 2 2 4 8
91- 100 2 1 3 6
The incidence was more (30%) seen in patients having weight in the range of 61 – 70
kg. 22% of patients were from the weight category of 71 – 80 kg and 18% from the 51
– 60 kg range.
Graph no :10
Distribution of 50 patients of Katigraha according to weight
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
31-40 41-50 51-60 61-70 71-80 81-90 91-100
Page: 113
Methodology
Table No:15
General Nidana observed in 50 patients of Katigraha
Nidana Trial
group
Control
group
Total percentage
Vatakara
ahara
9 8 17 34
Vatakara
vihara
14 15 29 58
Manasika 2 2 4 8
Maximum percentage of patients (58%) was seen with a history of indulgence in
Vatakara viharas. Vatakara aharas were observed in 34% of the patients and manasika
nidanas were seen in 8%.
Graph no :11
Distribution of 50 patients of Katigraha on basis of Nidaanas
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
vatakaravihara
vatakaraahara
manasika
Page: 114
Methodology
Table No:16
Main symptoms observed in 50 patients of Katigraha
Main
symptom
Trial
group
Control
group
Total Percentage
Pain 25 25 50 100.00
Stiffness 25 25 50 100.00
The two main symptoms were seen in all the patients.
Graph no :12
Distribution of 50 patients of Katigraha on basis of main symptoms
0
5
10
15
20
25
PAIN STIFFNESS
Page: 115
Methodology
Table No:17
Associated symptom observed in 50 patients of Katigraha
Associated
symptoms
Trial
group
Control
group
Total Percentage
Tenderness 18 14 32 64
About 64% of the patients had tenderness associated with the main complaints.
Graph no :13
Distribution of 50 patients of Katigraha on basis of associated symptoms
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
TENDERNESS
Page: 116
Results
RESULTS
EFFECT OF TRIAL AND CONTROL DRUG THERAPY IN KATIGRAHA
Table no:18
Effect of Trial drug combination on objective parameters after treatment of 25
katigraha patients:
Measures Sl.
No
Objective
Parameter BT AT BT-
AT
% S.D
(+-)
S.E
(+-)
t
value
p value
1
SLR Test
2.35
1.87
0.48
44.00
0.585
0.117
4.095
<0.001
2
Coin Test
2.98
2.62
0.36
36.00
0.489
0.097
3.674
<0.010
3
a)
Schobers
Test
Flexion
2.50
2.02
0.48
40.00
0.653
0.130
3.67
<0.010
b)
Extension
2.62
2.22
0.40
40.00
0.500
0.100
4.00
<0.001
4 Pump
Handle
Test
2.89
2.45
0.44
40.00
0.583
0.116
3.77
<0.001
5
Tenderness
3.01
2.73
0.28
32.00
0.458
0.091
3.055
<0.010
On examination, the effects of Trial drug therapy on various objective parameters
before and after the treatment in 25 patients of katigraha are documented. The
statistical analysis of SLR test in trial group revealed that the mean SLR score of
katigraha that was 2.35 before the treatment was reduced to 1.87 after the treatment.
Page: 117
Results
This change is statistically highly significant (P<0.001) by 44%. Statistical analysis of
coin test revealed a highly significant change (P<0.001) by 36%.
The statistical analysis of Schobers test for flexion showed a moderate significance
(P<0.010) by 40% and for extension showed a high significance (P<0.001) by 40%.
The statistical analysis for pump handle test by trial drug showed a high significance
(P<0.001) by 40%. The statistical analysis of tenderness showed that the trial drug
therapy provided a moderate significance (P<0.010) by 32%.
Table no:19
Effect of Trial drug combination on objective parameters after Follow up of 21
days on 25 katigraha patients:
Measures Sl.
No
Objective
Parameter BT AT BT-
AT
% S.D
(+-)
S.E
(+-)
t
value
p value
1
SLR Test
2.35
1.59
0.76
64.00
0.663
0.132
5.728
<0.001
2
Coin Test
2.98
1.64
0.64
64.00
0.489
0.097
6.531
<0.001
3
a)
Schober’s
Test
Flexion
2.50
1.78
0.72
60.00
0.678
0.135
5.307
<0.001
b)
Extension
2.62
2.02
0.60
60.00
0.50
0.10
6.00
<0.001
4 Pump
Handle
Test
2.89
2.17
0.72
64.00
0.613
0.122
5.865
<0.001
5
Tenderness
3.01
2.33
0.68
64.00
0.556
0.11
6.106
<0.001
Page: 118
Results
On examination, the effects of Trial drug therapy on various objective parameters
after follow up in 25 patients of katigraha are documented. The statistical analysis of
SLR test in trial group revealed that the mean SLR score of katigraha that was 2.35
before the treatment was reduced to 1.59 after the follow up. This change is
statistically highly significant (P<0.001) by 64%. Statistical analysis of coin test
revealed a highly significant change (P<0.001) by 64%.
The statistical analysis of Schobers test for flexion showed a high significance
(P<0.001) by 60% and for extension also showed a high significance (P<0.001) by
60%.
The statistical analysis for pump handle test by trial drug showed a high significance
(P<0.001) by 64%. The statistical analysis of tenderness showed that the trial drug
therapy provided a high significance (P<0.001) by 64%.
Page: 119
Results
Table no:20
Effect of Control drug on objective parameters after treatment of 25 katigraha
patients:
Measures Sl.
No
Objective
Parameter BT AT BT-
AT
% S.D
(+-)
S.E
(+-)
t
value
p value
1
SLR Test
2.33
1.45
0.88
68.00
0.725
0.145
6.062
<0.001
2
Coin Test
2.80
2.28
0.52
48.00
0.585
0.117
4.437
<0.001
3
a)
Schobers
Test
Flexion
2.50
1.94
0.56
56.00
0.506
0.101
5.526
<0.001
b)
Extension
2.11
1.51
0.60
56.00
0.577
0.115
5.196
<0.001
4 Pump
Handle
Test
2.88
2.2
0.68
60.00
0.627
0.125
5.421
<0.001
5
Tenderness
2.90
2.14
0.76
64.00
0.663
0.132
5.728
<0.001
On examination, the effects of control drug therapy on various objective parameters
before and after the treatment in 25 patients of katigraha are documented. The
statistical analysis of SLR test in control group revealed that the mean SLR score of
katigraha that was 2.33 before the treatment was reduced to 1.45 after the treatment.
This change is statistically highly significant (P<0.001) by 68%. Statistical analysis of
coin test revealed a highly significant change (P<0.001) by 48%.
Page: 120
Results
The statistical analysis of Schobers test for flexion showed a high significance
(P<0.001) by 56% and for extension showed a high significance (P<0.001) by 56%.
The statistical analysis for pump handle test by control drug showed a high
significance (P<0.001) by 60%. The statistical analysis of tenderness showed that the
control drug therapy provided a high significance (P<0.001) by 64%.
Table no:21
Effect of Control drug after follow up of 21 days on objective parameters of 25
katigraha patients:
Measures Sl.
No
Objective
Parameter BT AT BT-
AT
% S.D
(+-)
S.E
(+-)
t
value
p value
1
SLR Test
2.33
2.01
0.32
28.00
0.556
0.111
2.873
<0.010
2
Coin Test
2.80
2.44
0.36
28.00
0.637
0.127
2.822
<0.010
3
a)
Schobers
Test
Flexion
2.50
2.26
0.24
24.00
0.435
0.087
2.752
<0.020
b)
Extension
2.11
1.67
0.44
36.00
0.650
0.130
3.38
<0.010
4 Pump
Handle
Test
2.80
2.52
0.28
32.00
0.541
0.108
2.584
<0.020
5
Tenderness
2.90
2.20
0.70
20.00
0.408
0.081
2.449
<0.020
Page: 121
Results
On examination, the effects of control drug therapy on various objective parameters
after follow up in 25 patients of katigraha are documented. The statistical analysis of
SLR test in control group revealed a moderate significance after follow up (P<0.010)
by 28%. Statistical analysis of coin test revealed a moderate significant change
(P<0.010) by 28%.
The statistical analysis of Schobers test for flexion showed a mild significance
(P<0.020) by 24% and for extension showed a moderate significance (P<0.010) by
36%.
The statistical analysis for pump handle test by control drug showed a mild
significance (P<0.010) by 32%. The statistical analysis of tenderness showed that the
control drug therapy provided a mild significance (P<0.020) by 20% after follow up.
Page: 122
Results
Table no:22
Effect of Trial drug combination on subjective parameters after treatment of 25
katigraha patients:
Measures Sl.
No
Subjective
Parameter BT AT BT-
AT
% S.D
(+-)
S.E
(+-)
t
value
p value
1
Pain
3.02
2.74
0.28
28.00
0.458
0.091
3.055
<0.010
2
Stiffness
2.98
2.62
0.36
36.00
0.489
0.097
3.674
<0.010
3
Lateral
Flexion
2.92
2.52
0.40
36.00
0.577
0.115
3.464
<0.010
4
Rotation
3.14
2.82
0.32
28.00
0.556
0.111
2.873
<0.010
In the present work, pain is scored as per Greenough and Fraser method, by following
twelve questions. Each question carries scores with a minimum of 0 to a maximum of
9. Higher the score, better the performance status. Each patient answered all the
questions in every 7 days of interval during the treatment. Hence, after 21 days the
total score was calculated and analyzed as per statistical methods. On examination,
the effects of Trial drug therapy on pain after treatment in 25 patients of katigraha
were documented. The statistical analysis of pain in trial group revealed a moderate
significance (P<0.010) by 28%. Statistical analysis of stiffness revealed a moderate
significance (P<0.010) by 36%.
The statistical analysis of lateral flexion showed a moderate significance (P<0.010) by
36% and for rotation showed a moderate significance (P<0.010) by 28%.
Page: 123
Results
Table no:23
Effect of Trial drug combination on subjective parameters after Follow up of 21
days on 25 katigraha patients:
Measures Sl.
No
Subjective
Parameter BT AT BT-
AT
% S.D
(+-)
S.E
(+-)
t
value
p value
1
Pain
3.02
2.30
0.72
68.00
0.541
0.108
6.646
<0.001
2
Stiffness
2.98
2.34
0.064
64.00
0.489
0.097
6.537
<0.001
3
Lateral
Flexion
2.92
2.16
0.76
64.00
0.663
0.132
5.728
<0.001
4
Rotation
3.14
2.42
0.72
64.00
0.613
0.122
5.865
<0.001
The statistical analysis of pain in trial group after follow up revealed a high
significance (P<0.001) by 68%. Statistical analysis of stiffness also revealed a high
significance (P<0.001) by 64%.
The statistical analysis of lateral flexion showed a high significance (P<0.001) by
64% and for rotation showed a high significance (P<0.001) by 64%.
Page: 124
Results
Table no:24
Effect of control drug on subjective parameters after treatment of 25 katigraha
patients:
Measures Sl.
No
Subjective
Parameter BT AT BT-
AT
% S.D
(+-)
S.E
(+-)
t
value
p value
1
Pain
2.99
2.19
0.80
68.00
0.645
0.125
8.196
<0.001
2
Stiffness
3.00
2.68
0.32
28.00
0.556
0.111
2.873
<0.010
3
Lateral
Flexion
2.84
2.60
0.24
24.00
0.435
0.087
2.752
<0.020
4
Rotation
3.00
2.72
0.28
24.00
0.541
0.108
2.584
<0.020
The statistical analysis of pain in control group after treatment revealed a high
significance (P<0.001) by 68%. Statistical analysis of stiffness revealed a moderate
significance (P<0.010) by 28%.
The statistical analysis of lateral flexion showed a mild significance (P<0.020) by
24% and for rotation also showed a mild significance (P<0.020) by 24%.
Page: 125
Results
Table no:25
Effect of control drug on subjective parameters after Follow up of 21 days on 25
katigraha patients:
Measures Sl.
No
Subjective
Parameter BT AT BT-
AT
% S.D
(+-)
S.E
(+-)
t
value
p value
1
Pain
2.99
2.71
0.28
20.00
0.613
0.122
2.281
<0.050
2
Stiffness
3.00
2.84
0.16
16.00
0.374
0.074
2.138
<0.050
3
Lateral
Flexion
2.84
2.64
0.20
16.00
0.50
0.10
2.00
<0.100
4
Rotation
3.00
2.72
0.28
16.00
0.737
0.147
1.899
<0.100
The statistical analysis of pain in control group after follow up revealed a mild
significance (P<0.050) by 20%. Statistical analysis of stiffness also revealed a mild
significance (P<0.050) by 16%.
The statistical analysis of lateral flexion showed insignificance (P<0.100) by 16% and
for rotation also showed insignificance (P<0.100) by 16%.
Page: 126
Results
TOTAL EFFECT OF THERAPIES
Table no:26
Over all efficacy of Trial drug therapy after treatment on 25 Katigraha patients:
Category No. of patients %
Complete remission 0 0
Marked improvement 2 8
Moderate improvement 8 32
Mild Improvement 11 44
Unchanged 4 16
In this group 32% of patients were assessed under moderate improved category. 44%
patients were assessed under improved category. Only 8% showed marked
improvement. 16% were under unchanged category, where as nobody included under
complete relief.
Table no:27
Over all efficacy of Trial drug therapy after follow up on 25 Katigraha patients:
Category No. of patients %
Complete remission 0 0
Marked improvement 6 24
Moderate improvement 10 40
Mild Improvement 9 36
Unchanged 0 0
After follow up 40% of patients were assessed under moderate improved category.
36% patients were assessed under mildly improved category. 24% showed marked
Page: 127
Results
improvement. Nobody was included in unchanged category and none was included
under complete relief.
Table no:28
Over all efficacy of control drug therapy after treatment on 25 Katigraha
patients:
Category No. of patients %
Complete remission 0 0
Marked improvement 8 32
Moderate improvement 12 48
Mild Improvement 4 16
Unchanged 1 4
In this group, 48% of patients were assessed under moderate improved category. 16%
patients were assessed under improved category. 32% showed marked improvement.
4% were under unchanged category, where as nobody included under complete relief.
Table no:29
Over all efficacy of control drug therapy after follow up on 25 Katigraha
patients:
Category No. of patients %
Complete remission 0 0
Marked improvement 1 4
Moderate improvement 3 12
Mild Improvement 13 52
Unchanged 8 32
Page: 128
Results
After follow up, 12% of patients were assessed under moderately improved category.
52% patients were assessed under mildly improved category. Only 4% showed
marked improvement. 32% were under unchanged category, where as nobody
included under complete relief.
COMPARATIVE EFFECT OF THERAPIES
Table no:30
Comparative effect of therapies on objective parameters after treatment:
Groups SLR CT Flex Ext PHT Tenderness
Trial 44 36 40 40 40 32
Control 68 48 56 56 60 64
Graph no:14
Comparative effect of therapies on objective parameters after treatment:
01020304050607080
SLR CT Flx Ext PHT TND
From the above data, it is seen that the control group got better results after treatment
in all objective parameters.
Page: 129
Results
Table no:31
Comparative effects of therapies on objective parameters after follow up:
Groups SLR CT Flex Ext PHT Tenderness
Trial 64 64 60 60 64 64
Control 28 28 24 36 32 20
Graph no:15
Comparative effects of therapies on objective parameters after follow up:
0
1020
30
40
5060
70
SLR CT Flx Ext PHT TND
The same data after the proposed period of follow up showed an increased relief and
better results in the trial group due to the long-standing effect of the therapy and less
side effects.
Page: 130
Results
Table no:32
Comparative effects of therapies on subjective parameters after treatment:
Groups Pain Stiffness Lat flex Rotation
Trial 28 36 36 28
Control 68 28 24 24
Graph no:16
Comparative effects of therapies on subjective parameters after treatment:
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Pain Stiffness Lat Flex Rotation
From the above data assessed on subjective parameters after treatment, a better relief
in the magnitude of pain was seen in the control group. In case of stiffness, lateral
flexion and rotation a better result was seen in the trial group.
Page: 131
Results
Table no:33
Comparative effects of therapies on subjective parameters after follow up:
Groups Pain Stiffness Lat flex Rotation
Trial 68 64 64 64
Control 20 16 16 16
Graph no:17
Comparative effects of therapies on subjective parameters after follow up:
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Pain Stiffness Lat Flex Rotation
The same data after follow up period showed a prominent relief of pain, stiffness, and
an increase in ability to lateral flex and rotation in the trial group.
Page: 132
Results
OVER ALL COMPARATIVE EFFECTS
Table no: 34
Comparative effect of over all therapies after treatment:
Groups Complete Marked Moderate Mild Unchanged
Trial Group 0 8 32 44 16
Control Group 0 32 48 16 4
Graph no:18
Comparative effect of over all therapies after treatment:
05
101520253035404550
complete marked moderate mild unchanged
From the above data, it is clear that both groups do not provide complete relief. In the
marked improvement category, better results were seen in control group (32%). In the
trial group, marked improvement was seen in 8%.
In the moderately improved category also a high result was seen in control group, i.e.
48% where as 32% result was seen in trial group. In the mildly improved category,
trial group showed the better results i.e. 44% and in unchanged group trial group
showed 16%. The results for control group in above both categories were 16% and
4% respectively.
Page: 133
Results
Table no:35
Comparative effects of over all therapies after follow up:
Groups Complete Marked Moderate Mild Unchanged
Trial Group 0 24 40 36 0
Control Group 0 4 12 52 32
Graph no:19
Comparative effects of over all therapies after follow up:
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
complete marked moderate mild unchanged
From the above data, it is clear that both groups do not provide complete relief after
follow up. In the marked improvement category, better results were seen in trial group
(24%). In the control group, marked improvement reduced to 8%.
In the moderately improved category also a high result was seen in trial group, i.e.
40% where as only 12% result was seen in control group. In the mildly improved
category, control group showed the better results i.e. 52% and trial group had 36%
results. In unchanged group, none remained in trial group where as in control group
32% remained.
Page: 134
Discussion
DISCUSSION
The present dissertation work entitled – “Clinical Evaliuation of Katibasti and
Nirgundierandadi Kashaya in the Management of Katigraha” consist of following parts:
* Review of literature
* Clinical study
* Discussion
* Conclusion and Summary
Discussion about Review of literature:
Review of literature comprises of two separate chapters.
. The first chapter is named disease review. The first part of it, where brief description of
the historical aspect of the illness from Vedic era to the present time is being explored is
entitled as Historical review.
The second part of it elaborates the general description of disease
Katigraha. The etymological derivation, etiology, anatomy, clinical manifestations,
pathogenesis, prognosis and general principle of treatment Katigraha/Lowback ache are
discussed here.
The composition of the drug compounds Katigrahantaka Taila and
Nirgundi Erandadi Kashaya is detailed in the second chapter entitled Drug review. The
properties of the individual herbs used in the preparation of the medicinal compound in
brief are also given here.
The key points coming under these headings are being discussed below.
Vata is a force, which has got two functions; one is to recognize and other is to stimulate
all the activities in the body. Due to its Chala Guna it moves all over the body. The
Page: 135
Discussion
movement or Gati of the motive force Vata, has to be analyzed properly. By virtue of this
property vata has the nature of moving to different parts of the body, localize there and
produce disease pertaining to that structure. Katigraha is not mentioned as a separate
disease condition in any of the Bruhatrayees directly. Even though Acarya caraka has not
mentioned the condition directly, but by his quotation “Hetu sthaana visheshat ca bhavet
roga vishesh krit” he has indirectly mentioned all those conditions which can arise due to
localization of vaata in specific parts of the body.
Katigraha is one such condition in which the vitiated vata is localizing in the
katipradesha and producing stiffness and pain there.
This is a condition in which the gatatva of vata can be considered. In case of
Gatatva the aggravated Vata finds a suitable place for its lodgment. The suitable place
may be such as Dhatu, Upadhatu, Ashaya, and Avayava. Due to consumption of Vata
Vardhaka Ahara and Vihara the aggravated Vata while moving throughout the body
lodges in Khavaigunya Yukta Srotas. After getting lodged at those parts it impairs the
functions of particular structure and produces disease.
Kati is an area where there is a conglomeration of various sandhis, snaayu, and
peshis. Sandhi is a place where two or more structure unites. In the context of Asthi
Sandhi means a junction between two bones. Sandhi is not a single structure rather it is
considered as an organ. There are different structures, which helps in maintaining the
stability of the joint. Snayu or ligament, are those structures which helps in proper
binding of the joint. They unite the bones and help to direct the bone movement and
prevent the excessive and undesirable motion. Muscle tone helps to maintain the
alignment of the joint. Shleshaka Kapha or Synovial fluid, which fills up the cavities,
Page: 136
Discussion
occupies the Synovial joint, bursae and tendon sheaths. It provides the lubricant factors,
nutrient to the cartilage, disc, and helps in keeping the joint firmly united.
Shleshmadharakala situated in the joints supported by Shleshaka Kapha helps in
lubrication. Therefore the vitiation of vata can cause pathologies of these structures in the
kati pradesha leading to there hampered functioning.
The contemporary science explains the pathology of Katigraha in two settings.
One is due to the sub standard biomaterial of the joint (Dhatukshaya). Second is due to
increased applied pressure over the joint (Avarana). In Dhatukshya Janya Katigraham due
to old age and Vatakara Ahara Vihara there will be qualitative change in the joint
material gradually leading to disease manifestation. The other set of Samprapti where in
due to continuous pressure due to various factors like accumulated purisha the joint may
get affected (Due to Avarana) leading to disease manifestation. But here the characteristic
symptom of stiffness may or may not be seen but the referred pain can be obtained. This
demarcation in Samprapti helps in planning the treatment.
As Vata and Asthi are having Ashraya Ashrayi relation between them it
contributes to further worsening of symptoms. In addition to this, if the Marma related to
the low back region is affected, one can predict the prognosis of the condition as poor.
When there are structural changes in the joints the disease can be categorized as
Asadhya. The Cikitsa Sootra of Kati graha is Snehana, Svedana. Since it is a Vata Vikara
and Dhatukshaya is the resultant, Snehana and Svedana would be an ideal line of
treatment. In the contemporary science treatment is mainly aimed at Non–
pharmacological methods and analgesics. Among Non–pharmacological treatment
physical heat therapy is given importance. Katigraham is characterized by joint pain, and
Page: 137
Discussion
stiffness. The heat applied to the joint helps in combating many of the symptoms. In
present clinical study, kati-basti may act both as Svedana and Snehana (as oil is used).
But in any of the allied sciences Snehana as principle line of management is not
mentioned. Since in this disease, as Vata is the Prakupita Dosha and Kshaya of Snehadi
Guna is seen which can result in degeneration, Snehana would be an ideal line of
management. Along with this, the administration of the kwatha will help in correcting the
movement of vaata by the property of anulomana by virtue of the guna and karma of
ingredients present.
Discussion about Kati Basti:
The present study deals with the evaluation of Kati Basti shows following analyzed
factors.
1. About Prakruti
2. About quantity of oil
3. About height of the dough
4. About diameter of the dough
5. About temperature
6. About duration
1. Prakruti:
In the present study, the patients who are having Vaata and kapha predominance showed
tolerance to temperature more than other Prakruti. Such persons were able to tolerate up
to 460 C temperatures. This owes to the quality of Vaata and Kapha wherein Seeta
predominance is observed. These recordings were done with the help of pyrometer. The
persons who were having Pitta predominant Prakruti i,e Pitta Vaata and Pitta Kapha
Page: 138
Discussion
showed minimum tolerance to temperature (410 C). This owes to the Pitta Dosha wherein
tolerance to Uhsna Guna is minimal. Hence it may be viewed that the persons who are
having predominance of Vaata and Kapha Prakruti may tolerate more temperature when
compared to Pitta predominant Prakruti.
2. Quantity of oil:
During the study, it has been observed and standardized that minimum of 250 ml of oil is
required per procedure. Less than 250 ml showed minimum improvement in the pain and
suggests the minimum requirement. More than 250 ml of oil shows the clinical
improvement similar to that of 250 ml. hence it may be opined that more than 250 ml is
also not beneficial.
3. Height of the dough:
After a systematic series of experimentation, it came to a conclusion that the height of the
dough must be 2 cm. if it is less than 2 cm, 250 ml of oil cannot be retained properly. If
the height is more than 2 cm it is also of no use.
4. Diameter:
Different diameters ranging from 6 cm to 15 cm were tried in this study. Ultimately 12
cm of diameter was considered as the ideal diameter as it was able to retain 250 ml of oil
in the stipulated 2 cm of the height. Simultaneously reduction in pain and other faculties
were also observed. Diameter less than 12 cm even though they are having 2 cm of height
could not retain 250 ml of oil.
Page: 139
Discussion
5. Temperature:
In the present study the maximum temperature recorded was 460 C. Minimum of 410 C
was observed as the temperature tolerance. When we viewed the Prakruti it was related
with Kapha Vata and Pitta respectively.
Hence it may be viewed that a fixed temperature cannot be taken as norm.
6. Duration:
During this series, minimum of 30 minutes, maximum of 50 minutes time was observed.
This observation pertaining to minimum duration observed in Pitta predominant Prakruti
whereas maximum duration seen in Vaata Kapha predominance. This observation again
stress on individual Dosha/ Prakruti which is holding key in the decision of Samyak
Swinna Lakshanas. Hence it is not possible to put a maximum or minimum time barrier
for all the patients. A range of minimum of 30 minutes and maximum of 50 minutes may
be considered as standard.
In the above said parameters, parameters like duration, temperature varies in
different individuals. Remaining parameters like quantity of oil, height of dough,
diameter may be viewed as constants.
Clinical study is the topic of second part of dissertation. The materials and methods of the
present work with complete description of the assessment criteria are given here. The
descriptive statistical analysis of the sample taken for the study is methodically
elaborated. The observations, results and their statistical analysis are presented in order
with tables and graphs.
In the chapter entitled discussion, the results obtained are critically analyzed to reveal the
truth of efficacy of the combination taken for the study. The final conclusions drawn
Page: 140
Discussion
from the present clinical research work are detailed in the chapter summary and
conclusion.
Discussion about clinical study:
This clinical study is a sincere effort to add newer combinations of shamana treatment
with proved efficacy to the list already present. The present work is carried out with the
hope that the treatment adopted here may have some edge over the other combinations
prescribed in routine practice. It is also hoped that this work will pave new avenues for
enthusiastic research workers to further advance in this field and find a better cure for this
lingering malady. With this noble intention this work is presented.
PLAN OF STUDY
The present study has been carried out on 50 patients treated in two groups. The criteria
of diagnosis was based upon the classical signs and symptoms of the disease and
confirmed by various clinical tests like SLR, Schobers test, coin test and pumphandle
test. The patients with marked deformities of spinal column and those with associated
systemic disorders were excluded from the study.
25 patients out of the total 50 patients of Katigraha studied underwent Katibasti with
Katigrahantaka taila and administration of Nirgundi erandadi Kashaya internally 50 ml
twice daily after food for 21 days.
25 patients of the second group were given the standard control drug Diclofenac sodium
50mg twice daily after food for 21 days. Follow up was given for 21 days from next day
after the treatment for both groups.
The improvement in the symptoms of the disease and the changes in the clinical tests
after the treatment were the main criteria of assessment. The total effects of the therapies
Page: 141
Discussion
were also assessed in terms of complete remission, marked improvement, moderate
improvement mild improvement and unchanged.
DIAGNOSTIC CRITERIA AND ASSESSMENT CRITERIA:
To diagnose katigraha the main symptoms pain and stiffness was considered. Both
main symptoms of pain and stiffness were present in all patients but the intensity of pain
may defer from patient to patient.
Various movements of the spine were elicited by various objective and subjective criteria
including standard questionnaires. The objective criteria included SLR test, Schobers test,
coin test, pump handle test and grading for tenderness.
The subjective criteria included assessment of pain, stiffness, lateral flexion and rotation.
Pain was assessed by using the standard questionnaire of Greenough and Fraser method.
INVESTIGATION:
Routine hematological investigations like Hb%, TC, DC, ESR and Routine Urine
investigations were done in all cases. RBS and serum Cholesterol were done in some
cases to rule out systemic diseases. Routine radiological examination of the Lumbo sacral
spine in Antero posterior and lateral position was done in selected cases to rule out
various abnormalities.
NIDANATMAKA ASPECTS
Age:
Maximum numbers of patients were obtained in the age group of 31 – 50 years, i.e. 68%.
In the age group of 21 – 30 years 14% of patients were obtained, and in the age group of
51 – 60 years 12% of patients were recorded. Minimum numbers of patients were seen
from the age group 11 – 20, i.e. 6%.
This finding clearly shows that the age group of 31- 50 years are mostly affected.
Page: 142
Discussion
Sex:
Male patients i.e. 62% exceeded the female patients who were 38%.This may be due to
demographic facts.
Religion:
Among the patients selected for the study 38% were Hindus, 30% were Muslims and
32% were Christians. This may be due to demographic facts.
Occupation:
More incidence (30%) were seen in patients from the labor category. 18% of patients
were from the service category and16% of patients from the business category.12% were
in student category and 10% were unemployed.
Maximum number of patients belonged to the categories of hardworking life style.
Nature of occupation:
Occupation which involved standing erect for long duration predisposed the patients to
strain of the back. In the present study 34% of the patients had similar occupation. 30%
had to travel in two wheelers etc .as a part of their occupation leading to strain at low
back. 14% of patients had to sit for long duration. 12% had to walk more and 10% had to
bend their back more as a part of their work.
Marital status:
Among the patients 66% were married, 32% were unmarried and 2% of them were
widows.
Socio-economic Status:
The study showed more incidences (50%) of the condition in patients hailing from a
lower socio economic conditions owing to the nature of work, condition of living etc.
Page: 143
Discussion
About 30% of patients were from middle class and only 20% from upper class suffered
from the condition.
Dietary pattern:
Among the patients selected for the study 58% turned out to be non vegetarians and only
42% of them stuck to vegetarian food.
Family history:
Among the patients selected for the study 66% did not had a similar family history.
Only 34% of them had a related family history. This clearly shows that the disease have
no genetic predisposition.
Weight:
The incidence was more (30%) seen in patients having weight in the range of 61 – 70 kg.
22% of patients were from the weight category of 71 – 80 kg and 18% from the 51 – 60
kg range.
Nidana:
Maximum percentage of patients (58%) was seen with a history of indulgence in
Vaatakara viharas. Vaatakara ahaaras were observed in 34% of the patients and manasika
nidaanas were seen in 8%.
Main symptoms:
The two main symptoms of pain and stiffness were seen in all the patients.
Associated symptom:
About 64% of the patients had tenderness associated with the main complaints.
Page: 144
Discussion
Discussion of Results:
EFFECT OF THERAPIES
The assessment of the results was made by adopting the standard methods of scoring
questionnaires and the signs and symptoms of katigraha. It included assessment for
objective and subjective criteria by means of various tests and standard questionnaires
along with all signs and symptoms as per Ayurvedic classics.
Effect of trial drug therapy on objective criteria after treatment:
On examination, the effects of Trial drug therapy on various objective parameters before
and after the treatment in 25 patients of katigraha are documented. The statistical analysis
of SLR test in trial group revealed that the mean SLR score of katigraha that was 2.35
before the treatment was reduced to 1.87 after the treatment. This change is statistically
highly significant (P<0.001) by 44%.
Statistical analysis of coin test revealed a highly significant change (P<0.001) by 36%.
The statistical analysis of Schobers test for flexion showed a moderate significance
(P<0.010) by 40% and for extension showed a high significance (P<0.001) by 40%.
The statistical analysis for pump handle test by trial drug showed a high significance
(P<0.001) by 40%. The statistical analysis of tenderness showed that the trial drug
therapy provided a moderate significance (P<0.010) by 32%.
Effect of trial drug therapy on objective criteria after follow up:
On examination, the effects of Trial drug therapy on various objective parameters after
follow up in 25 patients of katigraha are documented. The statistical analysis of SLR test
in trial group revealed that the mean SLR score of katigraha that was 2.35 before the
treatment was reduced to 1.59 after the follow up. This change is statistically highly
Page: 145
Discussion
significant (P<0.001) by 64%. Statistical analysis of coin test revealed a highly
significant change (P<0.001) by 64%.
The statistical analysis of Schobers test for flexion showed a high significance (P<0.001)
by 60% and for extension also showed a high significance (P<0.001) by 60%.
The statistical analysis for pump handle test by trial drug showed a high significance
(P<0.001) by 64%. The statistical analysis of tenderness showed that the trial drug
therapy provided a high significance (P<0.001) by 64%.
Effect of control drug therapy on objective criteria after treatment:
On examination, the effects of control drug therapy on various objective parameters
before and after the treatment in 25 patients of katigraha are documented. The statistical
analysis of SLR test in control group revealed that the mean SLR score of katigraha that
was 2.33 before the treatment was reduced to 1.45 after the treatment. This change is
statistically highly significant (P<0.001) by 68%. Statistical analysis of coin test revealed
a highly significant change (P<0.001) by 48%.
The statistical analysis of Schobers test for flexion showed a high significance (P<0.001)
by 56% and for extension showed a high significance (P<0.001) by 56%.
The statistical analysis for pump handle test by control drug showed a high significance
(P<0.001) by 60%. The statistical analysis of tenderness showed that the control drug
therapy provided a high significance (P<0.001) by 64%.
Effect of control drug therapy on objective criteria after follow up:
On examination, the effects of control drug therapy on various objective parameters after
follow up in 25 patients of katigraha are documented. The statistical analysis of SLR test
Page: 146
Discussion
in control group revealed a moderate significance after follow up (P<0.010) by 28%.
Statistical analysis of coin test revealed a moderate significant change (P<0.010) by 28%.
The statistical analysis of Schobers test for flexion showed a mild significance (P<0.020)
by 24% and for extension showed a moderate significance (P<0.010) by 36%.
The statistical analysis for pump handle test by control drug showed a mild significance
(P<0.010) by 32%. The statistical analysis of tenderness showed that the control drug
therapy provided a mild significance (P<0.020) by 20% after follow up.
Effect of Trial drug therapy on subjective parameters after treatment:
In the present work, pain is scored as per Greenough and Fraser method, by following
twelve questions. Each question carries scores with a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 9.
Higher the score, better the performance status. Each patient answered all the questions in
every 7 days of interval during the treatment. Hence, after 21 days the total score was
calculated and analyzed as per statistical methods. On examination, the effects of Trial
drug therapy on pain after treatment in 25 patients of katigraha were documented. The
statistical analysis of pain in trial group revealed a moderate significance (P<0.010) by
28%. Statistical analysis of stiffness revealed a moderate significance (P<0.010) by 36%.
The statistical analysis of lateral flexion showed a moderate significance (P<0.010) by
36% and for rotation showed a moderate significance (P<0.010) by 28%.
Effect of Trial drug therapy on subjective parameters after follow up:
The statistical analysis of pain in trial group after follow up revealed a high significance
(P<0.001) by 68%. Statistical analysis of stiffness also revealed a high significance
(P<0.001) by 64%.
Page: 147
Discussion
The statistical analysis of lateral flexion showed a high significance (P<0.001) by 64%
and for rotation showed a high significance (P<0.001) by 64%.
Effect of control drug therapy on subjective parameters after treatment:
The statistical analysis of pain in control group after treatment revealed a high
significance (P<0.001) by 68%. Statistical analysis of stiffness revealed a moderate
significance (P<0.010) by 28%.
The statistical analysis of lateral flexion showed a mild significance (P<0.020) by 24%
and for rotation also showed a mild significance (P<0.020) by 24%.
Effect of control drug therapy on subjective parameters after follow up:
The statistical analysis of pain in control group after follow up revealed a mild
significance (P<0.050) by 20%. Statistical analysis of stiffness also revealed a mild
significance (P<0.050) by 16%.
The statistical analysis of lateral flexion showed insignificance (P<0.100) by 16% and for
rotation also showed insignificance (P<0.100) by 16%.
Probable mode of action of KatiBasti
It is very difficult to explain and conclude regarding the exact mode of action of Kati
Basti. Here an attempt is made to explain the probable mode of action of Kati-Basti.
Kati-Basti is a Bahya Svedana, Snehana (if oil is used) and more over it is an Sthanika
Shamana Cikitsa.
Acarya Sushruta in Shareerasthana explains – Out of the four Tiryak Dhamanis,
each divides gradually hundred and thousand times and thus become innumerable. These
cover the body like network and their openings are attached to Romakoopa. Through
Page: 148
Discussion
them only Veeryas of Abhyanga, Parisheka, Avagaha, Alepa enter into the body after
under going Paka with Bhrajaka Pitta in skin (Su.Sa.Sh.9/9 & Dal).
One more reference in Sushruta Cikitsasthana explains – Sneha used in Avagaha
produces Shareera Bala by saturating through Siramukha, Romakoopa and Dhamani
(Su.Sa.Ch.24/33).
Sushruta in Sutrasthana explains, Lepa like Bahirparimarjana treatments yield
result by entering to Romakoopa thereby circulating through Svedavaha Srotas
(Su.Sa.Su.18/4).
Vagbhata in Ashtanga Hridaya while explaining the functions of Bhrajaka Pitta
narrated that – Bhrajaka Pitta will be do Pacana of drugs used in Abhyanga, Parisheka,
and Lepa (A.H.12/14 & Aru, A.S.20).
Thus with the above references it can be said that drugs used in KatiBasti
procedure get absorbed through and produce action according to the property of the
medicine.
Kati-Basti procedure is a Bahya Shamana Cikitsa. It is Bahya Svedana and
Snehana (If Sneha is used) therapy. Svedana has the functions of neutralizing Stambha,
Gaurava and Sheetata. In Katigraham joint stiffness is one of the clinical features. Kati-
Basti is considered to have action on this symptom. The Stabdhata of Sandhi is mainly
due to Sheeta property of Vata. This Sheeta Guna is neutralized by Ushna Guna of
retained medicine.
As Sneha Dravya is used as media in case of Katibasti their action further
facilitates in alleviating Vata. Sneha Dravya has Drava, Sara, Snigdha, Picchila, Guru,
Sheeta, Mrudu and Manda Guna predominantly. The Vata Dosha, which is the key factor
Page: 149
Discussion
in the casuation of Katigraha, has almost opposite quality to this. Moreover Sneha
Dravya has similar property to that of Kapha Dosha. In Katigraham Sthanika
Kaphakshaya is due to Agantu Vata Dosha. Thus on one hand Sneha Dravya neutralizes
the Vata Dosha and on the other hand nourishes the Sthanika Kapha Dosha. This helps in
Samprapti Vighatana.
Mode of action of Katigrahantaka Taila
Taila is considered to have the supreme action against vata to pacify it and when it is
processed with efficient vaatahara drugs its action is amplified. The taila used here as
base is Tila taila. Tila is an excellent vata hara drug possessing guru snigdha properties
and ushna veerya. It also has the karma of vedana sthapana thus making it efficient in
alleviating pain.The prescribed taila for katibasti is having the drug Nirgundi as the chief
ingredient. As the taila is prepared with the svarasa of nirgundi the action is enhanced.
Nirgundi is an efficient vatahara drug possessing ushna veerya and is having the
property of sroto shodhana. This property is making it capable to correct the gati of vata.
Apart from this the vedanasthapana property nirgundi owes to pacification of pain and
balya property helps in strengthening of affected part.
Hingu and Lashuna are drugs possessing ushna veerya. This potency of the drugs makes
it capable of subsiding vata making it an efficient vata hara drug.
Shunthi, Pippali and Maricha are also efficient vaata hara drugs and possess teekshna
guna which makes them srotoshodhaka thus helping in proper penetration of the qualities
of oil in to the system. They also possess the vedanasamaka karma helping in subsiding
pain. Moreover they have the rasayana property helping in Dhatu vardhana or proper
nourishment of the affected area.
Page: 150
Discussion
Mode of action of Nirgundi erandadi kashaya
Katgraha is a disease in which vata is the vitiated dosha and while adopting the treatment
measures, correction of gati of vata becomes the prime factor to be noted. The prescribed
kashaya owing to the special properties of the ingredients present is considered to have
this action of rectifying the gati of vata. If we are observing the properties of individual
drugs present in the combination the mode of action can be better understood.
Nirgundi is the drug possessing ushna veerya and it helps in attaining anulaomana of
vata. It is an efficient srotoshodhaka helping in rectifying the gati of vata.
Eranda is considered as efficient vata hara as it possess guru snigdha gunas and ushna
veerya. It is vata anulomaka and is vedanasthapaka helping in pacifying pain.
Sahachara is having ushna veerya helping in subsiding vata. It is vedanasthapaka and
nadibalaprada helping in subsiding pain and strengthening of nerves.
Bala is an efficient rasayana drug having supreme action of pacifying vata by its guru
snigdha gunas. It is also having anulomana property correcting the gati of vata. It is
nadibalaprada and balya helping in strengthening of nerves. The brumhana and rasayana
property makes it efficient in dhatu vardhana.
Sunthi is also an efficient vatahara drug possessing ushna veerya and helps in enhancing
the action of other drugs involved in the combination thus increasing the efficiency of the
medicine. It helps the medicine to get metabolize easily and completely. It also shows its
action in the cellular level (Dhatwagni) and helps the cells to uptake the medicine in
optimum level.
Page: 151
Discussion
Role of media
Amount of heat given to the Taila, Kvatha materials privilege interchange of Gunamsha
of both the media and Dravyas. Both Vayu and Agni among Pancha Maha Bhootas
processes Laghu, Sookshma Gunas predominantly. In the process of Taila and Kvatha,
indirect Agni is given to the material. Ions of media will receive the Ushma and they
trespass into the Dravya, which is already drenched or sunken in the fluid and got
softened. Thus ions of water or oil penetrate into the drug and release entire Gunamsha of
Dravya. When such Kvatha, or Taila is administered either externally or internally it
induces the effects of the Dravya.
Mode of action and adverse effects of control drug Diclofenac Sodium134
It inhibits Prosta glandin synthesis reducing pain and inflammation. It also reduces
neutrophil chemotaxis and superoxide production at the inflammatory site reducing
inflammation. It is well absorbed orally, metabolized and excreted in both urine and bile.
The plasma T1/2 is ~2 hrs. It has good tissue penetrability & concentration in synovial
fluid is maintained for 3times longer period than in plasma, exerting extended therapeutic
action in joints.
Adverse effects of diclofenac sodium include epigastric pain, nausea, headache,
dizziness, rashes. In few cases gastric ulceration and bleeding are seen.
Page: 152
Discussion
ABSORPTION THROUGH SKIN
The skin anatomically consists of three distinct layers.
The epidermis
It consists of keratinocytes, melanocytes, langerhan’s cells and merkel cells. The
terminal point of keratinocytes differentiation is the formation of the stratum corneum.
Formation of this layer is the most important function of the epidermis. It protects the
skin against water loss, prevents the absorption noxious agents, and can be thought of as
consisting of bricks and mortar. Corneocytes forms the bricks and barrier lipids form the
mortar. ‘Granular cells’ which are stratum corneum helps in maintaining skin hydration
and their products serve as ultra violet filters. Lamellar granules also are found within
granular cells. These contain probarrier lipids.
Dermis
It is a thick, highly vascular layer made up of ground substance, fibroblasts and
collagen fibers, together with appendages of skin, sweat glands and pilosebaceous
follicles. It is metabolically active part of the skin.
Subcutaneous Tissue
It is a fibro fatty layer with varying quantities of adipose tissue in different
regions of the body. It provides physical and thermal protection to the deeper structures
of the body.
Drug Delivery
The primary barrier to absorption of exogenous substances through the skin is
stratum corneum. Rate of absorption is directly proportional to concentration of drug in
vehicle, partition co-efficient, diffusion co-efficient and thickness of the stratum
Page: 153
Discussion
corneum. Physiological factors that effect per cutaneous absorption include hydration,
occlusion, age, intact versus disrupted skin, temperature and anatomic site.
Among vehicles greases are anhydrous preparations that are either water insoluble or
fatty. Fatty agents are more occlusive than water-soluble. They restrict transepidermal
water loss and hence preserve hydration of the stratum corneum.
Absorption depends upon lipid solubility of the drug since the epidermis is a lipid
barrier. The dermis however is freely permeable to many solutes. Suspending the drug in
an oily vehicle can enhance absorption through the skin. Because hydrated skin is more
permeable than dry skin.
Application of medicaments, heat and massage definitely helps in eliminating the
number of noxious elements through skin. The application of heat in different forms of
Svedana promotes local circulation and metabolic activities and also opens the pores of
the skin to permit transfer of medicaments and nutrients towards to needed sites. It also
initiates elimination of vitiated Doshas and Malas through skin and perspiration.
PHYSIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF HEAT
Heating the tissues results in increased metabolic activity, increased blood flow
and stimulation of neural receptors in the skin or tissues and many other indirect effects.
• Increased metabolism
The increase in metabolism is greatest in the region where most heat is produced,
which is in the superficial tissues. As a result of the increased metabolism there is an
increased demand for oxygen and foodstuffs, and an increased output of waste products,
including metabolites.
Page: 154
Discussion
• Increased blood supply
As a result of increased metabolism, the output of waste products from the cells is
increased. These include metabolites, which act on the walls of the capillaries and
arterioles causing dilatation of these vessels. In addition, the heat has a direct effect on
the blood vessels, causing vasodilatation, particularly in the superficial tissues where the
heating is greatest. Stimulation of superficial nerve endings can also cause a reflex
dilatation of the arterioles. As a result of vasodilatation there is an increased flow of
blood through the area so that the necessary oxygen and nutritive materials are supplied
and waste products are removed.
• Effects of heating on nerves
Heat appears to produce definite sedative effects. The effect of heat on nerve conduction
has still to be thoroughly investigated. Heat has been applied as a counter irritant, which
is the thermal stimulus, may effect the pain sensation as explained by the gate theory of
Melzack and Wall.
Indirect effects of heating
o Muscle tissue – Rise in temperature induces muscle relaxation and increases the
efficiency of muscle action, as the increased blood supply ensures the optimum
conditions for muscle contraction.
o General Rise in temperature – As blood passes through the tissues in which the
rise of the temperature has occurred, it becomes heated and carries the heat to
other parts of the body, so that if heating is extensive and prolonged a general rise
in temperature occur.
Page: 155
Discussion
o Fall in blood pressure – If there is generalized vasodilatation the peripheral
resistance is reduced, and this causes a fall in blood pressure. Heat reduces the
viscosity of the blood, and this also tends to reduce the blood pressure.
o Increased activity of sweat glands – There is reflex stimulation of the sweat
glands in the area exposed to the heat, resulting from the effect of the heat on the
sensory nerve endings. As the heated blood circulates throughout the body it
affects the centers concerned with regulation of temperature, and there is
increased activity of the sweat glands throughout the body.
(Ref. The pharmacological basis of therapeutics – Goodman and Gillman, Physiology by
Robert M. Berne, Clayton’s Electro therapy by Angela Forster, Nigel Palastanga, Text
book of Pharmacology by K.D. Tripati)
Page: 156
Conclusion
CONCLUSION
Based on the conceptual analysis and observations made in the clinical study, the
following conclusions can be drawn.
The disease Katigraha is a sthana vishesha vatavyadhi.
Strenuous physical work, old age and direct abhigata are the predisposing
factors in the manifestation of the disease.
Maximum incidence of this disease was seen in the age group of 31-50 years.
Work power decrease with the chronicity of the disease.
The trial drug combination of Katibasti and Nirgundi Erandadi kashaya
showed high significance in decreasing pain, stiffness and tenderness, which
was noted completely after follow up(P<0.001).
Control drug therapy showed significant result in reducing pain and tenderness
soon after the treatment but recurrence of the condition was seen after the
follow up period and the significance decreased(P<0.050). It had a mild result
in decreasing the stiffness. Moreover, the control drug Diclofenac sodium was
reported to give various side effects like gastric irritation on the course of the
treatment.
On comparison of both groups after the follow up period, it is found that the
trial drug therapy was more efficient in relieving the signs and symptoms of
katigraha.
LIMITATIONS
The sizes of sample and time period were small to draw a generalized
conclusion. Therefore, the therapy can be tried in a large sample for
appropriate duration to observe its proper efficacy.
Page: 157
Conclusion
The procedure of katibasti was a long-standing procedure, which needed
admission in hospital and specialized care.
RECOMMENDATION FOR FURTHER STUDY
The study is advised on large samples.
Change in formulations in the capsule forms for better palatability and easy
administration.
Various other vatahara tailas told in classics and those used as folklore
medicines can be used after proper assessment.
Page: 158
Summary
SUMMARY
The present dissertation entitled “A CLINICAL EVALUATION OF KATIVASTHI
AND NIRGUNDI ERANDADI KASHAYA IN THE MANAGEMENT OF KATIGRAHA” has
been carried out to find out the efficacy of the therapeutic combinations of Kativasthi
with Katigrahantaka Taila and Nirgundi erandadi kashaya in comparison with control
drug Diclofenac sodium. This study contains Introduction, Objectives, and Review of
literature, Methodology, Results, Discussion and Conclusion.
Chapter 1 - Objectives of the study is explained.
Chapter 2 - Review of literature has detailed descriptions regarding the disease
Katigraha according to the classics. The description about the most resembling
conditions of Katigraha in modern science and treatment has been dealt in detail. The
ingredients of the trial drugs have been studied and explained in brief.
Chapter 3 – Methodology- Material and methods includes criteria for selection and
grouping of patients, treatment schedule and grading of the disease etc. are explained.
Observation of patients includes distribution of patients according to age, sex;
economical status, diet etc. are represented along with the tables and charts.
Chapter 4 – Results – Results of the therapies after the treatment, after follow-up
along with the statistical analysis are mentioned along with tables and charts.
Chapter 5 – Discussion – Includes elaborate discussion about disease, chikitsa, result
of therapies and probable mode of action of drugs.
Page: 159
Summary
Chapter 6 - Conclusion – It is concluded that the combination of trial drugs
“Kativasthi with Katigrahantaka Taila and Nirgundi erandadi kashaya” has a highly
significant result in providing better relief on the main and associated symptoms of
Katigraha compared to the control drug Diclofenac Sodium.
Page: 160
References
REFERENCES
No. Name of book Reference 1. Ca.Sa. Vi 8/ 18 2. Harrison’s Page 116 3. L.B.P.H.B Page 13 4. Ca. Sa Chi. 28/ 101 5. Rigveda 10/ 163 6. Yajurveda 9/ 21 7. Atharva veda 3/11/6 8. Atharva veda 19/60/2 9. Atharva veda 19/67/45 10. Atharva veda 9/8/21 11. Atharva veda 2/33/2 12. Atharva veda 2/33/2, 5, 6 13. Atharva veda 9/37, 21 14. Rig veda 10/163/2, 4 15. Atharva veda 9/7/7, 18 16. Kenopanishad 3/10 17. Chandogyopanishad 4/16/1 18. Chandogyopanishad 4/3/1 19. Kathopanishad 3/10 20. Prashnopanishad 3/7 21. Brahmasootra 1/5/3 22. Garuda purana 146 & 156 chapters 23. Ca.Sa.Su 20/11 24. Ca.Sa.Su 14/22 25. Ca.Sa.Su 17/101 26. Ca.Sa.Chi 28/56 27. Ca.Sa.Su 26/4 28. Ca.Sa.Ni 1/21 29. Ca.Sa.Su 16/8 30. Ca.Sa.Chi. 28/56 31. Ca.Sa.Chi 28/29 32. Ca.Sa.Chi 14/11 33. Su.Sa.Ni 1/23 34. Su.Sa.Ni 2/10 35. Su Sa.Ni 9/36 36. Su.Sa. Ka 4/37 37. A.H.Ni 15/7 38. A.H.Ni 16/5 39. Madhava Nidana 4/17-2 40. Madhava Nidana 5/12 41. Madhava Nidana 5/28 42. Madhava Nidana 25/8 43. Madhava Nidana 27/18 44. G. N 16/160 45. G. N 2/100
References
46. G. N 2/146 47. Sh. Sa. Pra 7/105 48. Amar 49. Sa. K.D., vol. II Page no. 348,349 50. Sh. Sa 7/110 51. Amar 52. Su.Sa.sh 5/24 53. Su.Sa.sh 5/27 54. Su.Sa.sh 5/27 55. A.H. Su 12/18 56. Su.Sa.sh 4/14, 15 57. Dalh. On Su. Sa. Ni 1/13 58. A. H. Su 11/26-28 59. Su.Sa Sh 5/29-36 60. Su.Sa Sh 5/37-38 61. Su.Sa Sh 5/16 62. L.B.P.H.B 63. A.H.Ni 1/10 64. Ca.Sa.Chi 28/15-17 65. BPN 24/1-2 66. Su.Sa.Su 21/19-20 67. Su.Sa.Ni 1/67,68,79 68. A.S.Ni 15/31,34,41 69. A.H.Ni 1/14,15 70. A.H.Ni 15/29,32,33,47 71. Ca.Sa.Chi 28/59 72. A.S.Ni 15/7,8 73. A.H.Ni 15/5,6 74. Ca.Sa.Chi 28/18-19 75. A.H.Ni 15/5-6 76. Ca.Sa.Ni 1/8 77. Ca.Sa.Chi 28/19 78. Ca.Sa.Chi 28/23 79. A.H.Su (Arunadatta) 12/49 80. A.H.Su(Hemadri) 12/49 81. Su.Sa.Ni(Dalh.) 5/13 82. Harrison’s Page 74 83. Harrison’s Page 74 84. Das. Sur. Page 200 85. Harrison’s Page76 86. L.B.P.H.P Page 87. Harrison’s Page77 88. Das.Sur. Page 201 89. Das.Sur Page 202 90. Das.Sur Page 202 91. Das.Sur. Page 200 92. Das.Sur. Page201 93. Harrison’s Page77
References
94. Harrison’s 95. Ca.Sa.Su 10/7 96. Ca.Sa.Chi 28 97. A.H.Ni 8/30 98. Su.Sa.Su 33/4 99. Su.Sa.Su 33/7 100. Su.Sa.Chi 24/30 101. Ca.Sa.Chi 28/83 102. A.S.Chi 23 103. A.S.Chi 23 104. Ca.Sa.Su 1/40 105. Vg.Sa 574-576 106. Su.Sa.Chi 35/29-30 107. Ca.Sa.Su 22/11 108. Ca.Sa.Su 22/16 109. A.S.Su 26/41 110. Su.sa.chi 32/1 111. A.H.Su 17/1 112. Ca.Sa.Su 14/39-40 113. A.S.Su 27/7 114. Ca.Sa.Chi(Chakrapani) 32 115. BPN sweda vidhi 116. H.Sa 4/1 117. A.S.Su 26/22 118. Su.Sa.Chi 32/22 119. A.S.Su 26/37 120. BP 121. Y.R. vatavyadhi Chikitsa 122. B.R. Vataroga 6 123. Sahasrayoga 124. P.V.S Page no 66 125. P.V.S Page no 58 126. P.V.S Page no 185 127. P.V.S Page no 734 128. P.V.S Page no 331 129. P.V.S Page no 350 130. P.V.S Page no 72 131. P.V.S Page no 275 132. P.V.S Page no 362 133. P.V.S Page no 120 134. Med. Pharm Page no 462
BIBILIOGRAPHY
BIBLIOGRAPHY
• Acharya Agnivesha, Charaka samhita, Chakrapani, Ayurveda Deepika,
Gangadhara Jalpakalpataru, Commentaries of Charaka Samhita, edited by
Kaviraja Shree Narendranathsen Gupta and Kaviraj Shree Balachandra Sen
Gupta, Published by Chowkambha Orientalia, Varanasi, Reprint.1991.
• Acharya Bhavamishra, Bhavaprakash; Vidyotini Hindi Commentry by
Brahmasankara misra & Rupalalji Vaisya, Chaukmbha Sanskrit Sansthan,
Varanasi.
• Acharya Bhavamishra; Bhavaprakash Nighantu, commentary by Dr.K.C
Chunekar, edited by Dr.G.S.Pondey, 1998, Chaukambha Bharati Academy,
Varanasi.
• Acharya Chakrapanidatta, Chakradatta with Vaidayaprabha hindi commentary
by Dr. Indradeva Tripathi, 1997, Chaukambha Sanskrit Sansthan, Varanasi.
• Acharya Madhavakara, Vijayarakshita and Shrikantadatta Shastri Madhukosha
Commentary, Madhava Nidana with Vidyotini Hindi commentary edited by
Brahmanand Tripati, Vol. I, Edition, 1998, Published by Chowkambha
Surabharati Prakashana.
• Acharya Sodhala, Gada Nigraha: (1997), Vidyotini Hindi commentary by Sri
Indradeva Tripathi edited by Sri Ganga Sahaya Pondeya II edition,
Chaukambha Sanskrit Sansthan, Varanasi.
• Acharya Sushruta, Dalhanacharya nibandha sangraha, Nyayachandrika panjika
(Gayadas) commentary of Sushruta Samhita. Edited by yadavaji Trikamji
Acharya published by Chowkambha Orientalia, Varanasi, 1991.
BIBILIOGRAPHY
• Acharya Vagbhata, Arunadatta and Hamadri commentaries of Astanga
Hridayam. Edited by Bhishagacharya Harishastri Paradakar Vaidya Published
by Chowkambha Orientalia, Varanasi 8th Edition, 1998.
• Acharya Vagbhata, Astanga Sangraha with Indu teeka. Edited by Vaidya
Pandit Ramachandra Shastry Kinjwadekar, 2nd Edition, 1990. Srisatguru
Publication, Delhi.
• Acharya Vangasena, Vangasena Samhita, by Shankarlal Harishankar, Khemraj
shrikrishanadas publication, Bombay, 1996.
• Anonymous, Yogaratnakara: Vidyotini Hindi commentary by Vaidya
Laksmipathi Sastri, 7th edtn 1999, Chaukambha Sanskrit Sansthan, Varanasi.
• Ayurvedeeya Panchakarma Vignana by Vaidya Haridas Shridhar Kasture
Published by Shree Baidyanath Ayurveda Bhavana Limited, Great Naga Road,
6th Edition, 1999.
• Basavaraju; Bavasavarajeeyam, Published by V. Ramaswamy Sastrulu and
Sons, Madras, 1951.
• Bhela; Bhela Samhita, with English translation Dr. K.H. Krishnamurthy,
edited by Prof. Priyavat Sharma, 1st edition, 2000, published by Chaukhambha
Vishwabharathi, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh.
• Bruhat Nighantu Ratnakara with hindi teeka by shri Datta rama shri Krishnalal
Mathur published by Khemraj shri Krishna das publication Bombay, 1996.
• Cole & Herring; The Low Back Pain Handbook, Edited by Andrew J.cole, 1st
Edition, Jaypee brothers, New Delhi.
• Cyrix J.; Text Book of Orthopedic Medicine, vol.1, 8th Edition, Baillier tindal,
London.
BIBILIOGRAPHY
• Dasa Govinda; Bhaishajya Ratnavali, redacted by Bhishakratna Shri Brahma
Shankara Mishra with Vidyotini tika by Kaviraj Sri. Ambikadutta Shastri
edited by Sri Rajashwara Dutta Shastri, 13th Edition, 1999, published by
Chaukhambha Sanskrit Samsthan, Varanasi.
• Deva Raja Radhakanta; Shabdakalpadruma, vol.1, Pub:Nag Publishers,Delhi
• Dr.Mahajan B.M Methods in Biostastics, Jaypee Brothers,New Delhi.
• Forster Angela, Palastanga Nigel, Clayton’s Electro Therapy, 9th edtn.
• Goodman and Gilman (2001): The pharmacological basis of therapeutics,
edited by Joel G Hardman and Lee E Limbird, 10th edtn, Mc. Graw Hill Book
Company, Hamberg.
• Haareeta; Haareeta Samhita, Institute of Franceeis D,Indologoc, Pondicherry.
• Harisson's Principles of Internal Medicine, 14th Edition, 1998. International
Edition, Ed - Anthony Fauci S. et al., 1998.
• Human Anatomy by Dr. B.D. Chaurasia, 2nd Edition, Vol.I, Published by CBS
Publishers and Distributors, Delhi 32, 1991.
• Kashyapa; Kashyapa Samhita, edited by P.V. Tivari, Published by
Chaukhambha Orientalia, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh.
• K.D. Tripathi, Essentials of medical pharmacology, 4th edition,1999, edited by
M. Tripathi, Jaypee brother’s medical publications, New delhi.
• M.Monier William A Sanskrit English Dictionary, National Banarasidas
Publishers Pvt. Ltd. New Delhi, 1st edtn. 2002.
• Principles of Anatomy & Physiology by Tortora. Published by John Wiley and
Sons, Inc., New York, 9th Edition, 2000.
BIBILIOGRAPHY
• Principles of Neurology Raymond D. Adams, Maurice Victor and Allan H.
Ropper, 6th International Edition, Libary of Congress Cataloging in
Publication, 1997.
• Raja Radha Kantadeva, Shabda Kalpa Druma Sanskrit Dictionary, Published
by Chowkhambha Sanskrit Series, Varanasi, 3rd Edition, 1967.
• Sahasra Yoga; 1st edition, 1990, Ed: Vaidya Mahendrapala Simha Arya, Delhi:
Vagmaya Anusandaha.
• Sharangadhara; Sharangadhara samhita English translated edition by
Ayurveda Vidwan Prof. K. R. Srikanta Murthy, published by Chaukhambha
Orientalia, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh.
• Sharma Prof P.V.; Dravya Guna Vijnana, 1998, Chaukambha Amarabharati
prakashana, Varanasi.
• Siddhinanadan Mishra, Ayurveda Rasashastra, Chaukamba orientalia,
Varanasi, 8th edtn.1998.
• Suresh Babu, Research methodology for Ayurvedic scholars, Chaukamba
Orientalia, Varanasi, 1st edtn.2001.
• Taranath Bhattacharya Shabda Sthoma Mahanidhi Sanskrit Dictionary
Published by Chowkambha Sanskrit Series, Varanasi, 3rd Edition, 1967.
• Taranath Takravachaspathi, Vachaspatyam Sanskrit Dictionary, Published by
Chowkambha Sanskrit Series, Varanasi, 3rd Edition, 1970.
Clinical Proforma Department of Kayachikitsa
A.L.N. Rao Memorial Ayurvedic Medical College Koppa-577126, Chikmagalur
PROFORMA FOR CLINICAL STUDY ON KATIGRAHA
P.G. Scholar: Dr. Sarat.k.Babu Guide: Dr. T.K.Mohanta Co-guide: Dr Rashmi.R.Mishra
B.A.M.S. M.D(Ay),Ph.D M.D(Ay).
Part A: Examination
Name of the Patient : Case No. :
Age : O.P. No. :
Sex : Male / Female I.P. No. :
Religion H/M/C/O : Ward No. :
Marital Status M/UM/W/D : Bed No. :
Socio-economic class : P/M/UM/UC Date of Commencement :
Education : Un/Pr/Sec/Gr Date of Completion :
Occupation : HW/W/B/S/E
Address : Group :
A) Trial
B) Control
I. Chief Complaint Duration BT AT AFU
a) Pain
b) Stiffness
II. Associated Complaint
a) Tenderness
III. History of Present illness
A) Mode of onset
B) History of injury
C) Part first affected (Order of affection)
D) Pain
i) Mode of Onset – Trauma / Spontaneous
ii) Onset – Acute / Chronic
iii) Duration of pain
iv) Site of pain
v) Character
Intensity of pain – Mild / Moderate / Severe / No
E) Predisposing Factors
a) Movements
b) Increased Intra abdominal pressure
c) Seasonal variation
d) Diurnal variation
IV. History of Past illness
A) History of Trauma
B) History of Anesthesia
C) Did the pain begin after delivery Y N Not Significant
D) Treatment history -
Did the patient undergo treatment for:
a. T.B.Spine Y N
b. Osteo myelitis Y N
c. I.V.D.P Y N
d. Tumor Y N
e. Any other disease Y N
If so details: Medicine
Local application
Surgery / Traction etc.,
V. Family History
VI. Personal History
A) Ahara : Veg / Mixed
Habit: Samasana / Vishamasana / Adhyasana / Anasana
Rasapradhana : M/A/L/K/T/KS/Sarva rasa
B) Agni : Samagni / Mandagni / Vishamagni/Tikshnagni (BT), …….. (AT)….(AFU)
C) Koshta : Mridu / Madhyama / Krura (BT), …….. (AT)….(AFU)
D) Nidra : Sound / Disturbed / Irregular / Ratri jagarana
E) Vyasana : Alcohol / smoking / tobacco chewing / Others
F) Vihara: Exercise - Regular/Irregular/Occasional/Only routine work
G) Malapravrutti : Regular / Irregular / Constipation
Loose / Soft / Hard.
Frequency ……………
H) Mootrapravrutti : Regular / Irregular ……….times / day ……..times / night
Color :
VII. Occupational History
Nature of work: Sedentary/Moderate/Heavy
Time of work: Day / Night / Day and Night
VIII. Social History
Hygienic Condition of residence: Poor / Moderate / Good.
IX. Gynecological/Obstetrics History
Part - B
I. General Examination
BT …. AT….AFU
Pulse -
BP -
Heart rate -
Temperature -
Pallor -
Icterous -
Cyanosis -
Clubbing -
Pedal Edema -
Lymphadenopathy
Posture - Asymmetry of shoulders/iliac crests/trochanteric heights
Gait - Painful/Painless
Asymmetry of movements: Present / absent
Dasha vidha Pareeksha
• Prakruthitha – V/P/K/VP/VK/PK/VPK
• Vikruthitha – P/M/A
• Satwatha – P/M/A
• Satmyatha – P/M/A
• Sarathaha – P/M/A (T/R/M/Me/A/Mj/Sh/S)
• Samhanatha – P/M/A
• Aharatha – Abhyavaharana P/M/A (BT), P/M/A (AT)
– Jaranashaktitha P/M/A (BT), P/M/A (AT)
• Vyayamashaktitha – P/M/A
• Pramanatha – Height ……….. ft..…inches
Weight …….kg.
• Vayatha – Baala / Madhyama / Vruddha
B) Ashtavidha Pareeksha
Nadi
Mootra
Mala
Jiwha
Shabda
Sparsha
Drik
Akruthi
C) Srotho Pareeksha
1. Pranavaha: Prakruta Vaikruta
2.Udakavaha: Prakruta Vaikruta
3.Annavaha: Prakruta Vaikruta
4.Rasavaha: Prakruta Vaikruta
5.Raktavaha: Prakruta Vaikruta
6.Mamsavaha: Prakruta Vaikruta
7.Medovaha: Prakruta Vaikruta
8.Asthivaha: Prakruta Vaikruta
9.Majjavaha: Prakruta Vaikruta
10.Sukravaha: Prakruta Vaikruta
11Artavavaha: Prakruta Vaikruta
12.Swedavaha: Prakruta Vaikruta
13.Mutravaha: Prakruta Vaikruta
14. Purishavaha Prakruta Vaikruta
II. Systemic Examination
a) Gastro Intestinal Tract
b) Respiratory System
c) Cardio Vascular System
d) Central Nervous system
e) Loco motor system
• REFLEXES –
Superficial - Plantar
Deep - Knee jerk
- Ankle jerk
III. Local Examination BT…….AT…..AFU
I. a) Inspection
i) Swelling: Present / absent
ii) Alteration in curvature of spine: Present / absent
iii) Muscular wasting: Present / absent
iv) Discoloration: Present / absent
v) Scar/Bruise: Present / absent
vi) Wasting: Present / absent
b) Palpation BT….AT….AFU
i) Local temperature: Present / absent
ii) Local tenderness: Present / absent
iii) Rigidity : Present / absent
c) Percussion
i) Local tenderness: Present / absent BT….AT….AFU
II. Movements
i) Flexion BT….AT….AFU
ii) Extension BT….AT….AFU
iii) Lateral Flexion BT….AT….AFU
iv) Rotation BT….AT….AFU
- Does any of the movement cause pain Yes / No
-Is there any restriction of movements Yes / No
iii. Tests
a) SLRtest
b) Pump handle test
c) Schober’s Test
d) Coin test
IV. Investigation
1. Hematological Investigation: Hb,TC, DC, E.S.R
R.B.S., Serum cholesterol, RA
Factor if needed
2. Routine Urine Investigation: Alb
Sugar
Micro
3. Radiology : X-ray of Lumbosacral spine: AP,
Lateral (if needed)
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
A) Objective
Signs and Symptoms
Tenderness Coin test
Pump handle test
SLR test
Flexion Extension
BT AT
B) Subjective
Signs and Symptoms
Pain Stiffness Lateral Flexion
Rotation
BT AT
PAIN Parameters BT 7AFU 14AFU 21AFU
Painkillers Consultations Work Rest Household job Sports/dancing Dress wearing Sitting Walking Sleep Travel Sexual life
Symptoms Method BT 7AFU 14AFU 21AFU
Pain Greenough and Fraser scoring method
Scoring Chart
A) OBJECTIVE
i)Tenderness
0 No Pain
1 Patient says it’s paining
2 Patient winces
3 Patient winces and withdraws the part
4 Patient dos not allow to touch the part
ii) Range of Movement
Schobers test ♦ Extension
0 Extension up to 2.5 cm
1 Extension up to 2 cm
2 Extension up to 1.5 cm
0 Extension < 1 cm
♦ Flexion
0 Flexion up to 4 cm
1 Flexion up to 3 cm
2 Flexion up to 2 cm
3 Flexion <1 cm
iii) Other Tests
♦ Straight leg raising test
0 Can lift up to 900
1 Can lift up to 750
2 Can lift up to 500
3 Can lift up to 250
4 Cannot lift
♦ Coin test
0 Can bend without difficulty
1 Can bend with difficulty but no support
2 Can bend with difficulty but need support
3 Cannot bend
♦ Pump handle test
1 Can perform the test
2 Can perform the test with difficulty
3 Cannot perform the test
B) SUBJECTIVE
•Lateral Flexion
0 Can do lateral flexion easily
1 Can lateral flex with difficulty
2 Cannot perform lateral flexion
•Rotations
0 Can rotate easily
1 Rotation with difficulty
2 Cannot rotate
• Stiffness
0 None
1 Less than 15 minutes
2 15 to 30 minutes.
3 More than 30 minutes.
• Pain
0 No Pain (score 61-66)
1 Mild (score 41-60)
2 Moderate (score 21-40)
3 Severe (score <20)
• Pain -Greenough and Fraser scoring method: Question Answer Points
Never 6 Occasionally 4
Almost every day 2 How often do you have to take pain killers for your pain?
several times every day 0 Never 6 Rarely 4
1-2 times per month 2 How often do you have consultation with a doctor?
1-2 times per week 0 full time at regular job 9 full time at a lighter job 6
part time 3 At present, are you working?
not working 0 not at all 6 a little 4
half the day 2 So you need to rest during the day because of pain?
Over half the day 0 Normally 9
as many as usual, but slowly 6 A few, not as many as usual 3
At present, can you undertake household chores or additional jobs?
not at all 0 as much as usual 9 At present, can you undertake sports or
active pursuits, such as dancing? almost as much as usual 6
Some, much less than usual 3 not at all 0 no effect 3
mildly or moderately affected 2 Difficult 1
How much does back pain affect your ability to dress?
not possible 0 no effect 3
mildly or moderately affected 2 Difficult 1
How much does back pain affect your ability to sit?
not possible 0 no effect 3
mildly or moderately affected 2 Difficult 1
How much does back pain affect your ability to walk?
not possible 0 no effect 3
mildly or moderately affected 2 Difficult 1
How much does back pain affect your ability to sleep?
not possible 0 no effect 3
mildly or moderately affected 2 Difficult 1
How much does back pain affect your ability to travel?
not possible 0 no effect 6
mildly or moderately affected 4 Difficult 2
How much does back pain affect your sex life?
not possible 0 • The higher the score, the better the performance status.
V. Provisional Diagnosis:
VI. Final Diagnosis:
Part – C
Treatment Schedule
Trial Group -
Kativasthi – Katigrahantaka Taila
Duration – 21 days
Oral medicine – Nirgundi erandadi kashaya
Dose – 50 ml B.D. after food
Duration – 21 days
Control Group -
Oral medicine – Diclofenac sodium
Dose – 50 mg B.D. after food
Duration – 21 days
Any Complications -
Part D
Pathya / Apathya
Signature of the Researcher Signature of the Guide
POST GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH CENTRE
DEPARTEMENT OF KAYACHIKITSA
A.L.N. RAO MEMORIAL AYURVEDIC MEDICAL COLLEGE
KOPPA-CHICKMAGALUR
PATIENT CONSENT FORM
I __________________________________________ exercising my free power of
choice, hereby give you my complete consent to be included as a subject in the
Clinical trial on “A CLINICAL EVALUATION OF KATIVASTHI AND NIRGUNDI ERANDADI
KASHAYA IN THE MANAGEMENT OF KATIGRAHA”. I have been informed to my
satisfaction by the attending Doctor, the purpose of the Clinical Trial and the nature of
drug treatment, therapeutic procedures, follow-up and probable complications. I am
also ready to undergo necessary Laboratory Investigations to monitor and safeguard
my body functions.
I am also aware of my right to opt out of the trial at any time during the course
of the trial without having to give the reasons for doing so.
Signature of the Doctor Signature of the Patient/Guardian (£Á£ÀÄ N¢/ N¢¹ CxÀð ªÀiÁrPÉÆAqÀÄ
¸À» ºÁQgÀÄvÉÛãÉ.)