kassner case presentation (ms)
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Kassner Case Presentation (ms)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081207/58ab1c7a1a28abb5278b4ca7/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Residuary Trust A U/W/O Kassner v. Dir., Div. of Taxation, App. Div:
An Overview of the Residuary Trust Landscape
Presented By:
Michael L. Salad
![Page 2: Kassner Case Presentation (ms)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081207/58ab1c7a1a28abb5278b4ca7/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Facts
• Fred E. Kassner, a New Jersey resident and domiciliary, died in 1998
• His will created a resident testamentary trust (Trust A)
• Trustee was a New York resident and administered Trust A outside of New Jersey
• Trust A owned S-Corporation stock
![Page 3: Kassner Case Presentation (ms)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081207/58ab1c7a1a28abb5278b4ca7/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Facts
• Trust A filed a 2006 Form NJ-1041
• Trust A paid tax on:
– The net pro rata share of S-Corporation income allocated to New Jersey
• No distribution made to beneficiaries in 2006
![Page 4: Kassner Case Presentation (ms)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081207/58ab1c7a1a28abb5278b4ca7/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Facts
• N.J. audit assessed a deficiency in tax liability
• The New Jersey Division of Taxation determined 100% of undistributed income was taxable, including income outside of New Jersey
![Page 5: Kassner Case Presentation (ms)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081207/58ab1c7a1a28abb5278b4ca7/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Issues:
• May N.J. properly tax undistributed income derived from a testamentary trust?
• Does ownership of stock in a N.J. S-Corp constitute ownership of N.J. assets?
![Page 6: Kassner Case Presentation (ms)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081207/58ab1c7a1a28abb5278b4ca7/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Applicable N.J. Laws
• The Act imposes taxes on the New Jersey gross income of all individuals, estates or trusts. N.J.S.A. 54A:2–1.
• N.J.S.A. 54A:5–1(h) includes in New Jersey gross income the “net gains or income derived through estates or trusts.”
• N.J.S.A. 54A:5–3 taxes “income or gains of the estate or trust ... which has not been distributed or credited to its beneficiaries.”
![Page 7: Kassner Case Presentation (ms)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081207/58ab1c7a1a28abb5278b4ca7/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Argument #1
• Director contended that 100% of the undistributed income of Trust A was taxable pursuant to the New Jersey Gross Income Tax Act
• Director cited District of Columbia v. Chase Manhattan Bank and Chase Manhattan Bank v. Gavin
![Page 8: Kassner Case Presentation (ms)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081207/58ab1c7a1a28abb5278b4ca7/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Ruling 1
• Tax court cited Potter v. Taxation Div. Dir. And Pennoyer v. Dir. Div. Taxation
• New Jersey is barred from jurisdiction when there is a lack of sufficient contacts in the state
• Trust was not administered in N.J.
![Page 9: Kassner Case Presentation (ms)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081207/58ab1c7a1a28abb5278b4ca7/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Argument #2
• Director believes that Trust A must report New Jersey pro rata share of S Corporation income as New Jersey income
• Director cited N.J.S.A. 54A:5-10 and N.J.A.C. 18:35-1.5(d)(5)(i) through (ii)
![Page 10: Kassner Case Presentation (ms)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081207/58ab1c7a1a28abb5278b4ca7/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Ruling
• Tax court cited 26 U.S.C.A.§1361(a)(1) and the Pennoyer ruling
• Final ruling held that the Director incorrectly conflated taxation with ownership of assets
![Page 11: Kassner Case Presentation (ms)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081207/58ab1c7a1a28abb5278b4ca7/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Ruling
• An S-Corporation elects to pass its income through to its shareholders who are subject to taxation thereon
• No mention of transfer of ownership of assets from the corporation to the shareholder
• The owner of the stock in an S-Corporation does not own or hold title to the assets
![Page 12: Kassner Case Presentation (ms)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081207/58ab1c7a1a28abb5278b4ca7/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Appellate Ruling
• Affirmed the ruling by the Tax Court
• Cited Division’s Official Guidance
• Refused to hear new arguments
![Page 13: Kassner Case Presentation (ms)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022081207/58ab1c7a1a28abb5278b4ca7/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Planning Techniques
• Unconstitutional to tax a trust based solely on the settlor’s residency
• Increasingly more common for trustees, beneficiaries and assets to be mobile
• Importance in considering new or additional state income tax rulings and changes in residency of trustees, beneficiaries, and location of assets