june 29, 2009eurispet1 strength of the lithosphere introduction to mantle rheology from laboratory...

59
June 29, 2009 EURISPET 1 Strength of the lithosphere Introduction to mantle rheology from laboratory approach Shun-ichiro Karato Yale University New Haven, USA

Upload: nathan-tyler

Post on 24-Dec-2015

217 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

June 29, 2009 EURISPET 1

Strength of the lithosphereIntroduction to mantle rheology from

laboratory approachShun-ichiro Karato

Yale UniversityNew Haven, USA

June 29, 2009 EURISPET 2

Yale University

June 29, 2009 EURISPET 3

Outline

• rheology and geological problemsplate tectonics, survival of continents

• fundamentals of non-elastic deformation• oceanic lithosphere• importance of opx

• continental lithosphere• water, pressure effects

June 29, 2009 EURISPET 4

June 29, 2009 EURISPET 5

Plate Tectonics (bending)

Survival of Continents

(strength of the oceanic lithosphere)

(oceanic lithosphere)

(strength of the continental lithosphere)

Geodynamic issues in subduction zones related to rheological properties

June 29, 2009 EURISPET 6

A conventional model of lithosphere strength(Kohlstedt et al., 1995)

This model does not explain major geological features:too strong oceanic lithosphere for plate tectonicstoo weak continents to preserve deep continental roots

oceanic lithosphere continental lithosphere

June 29, 2009 EURISPET 7

ABC of rock deformation

How to construct a strength profile?

Brittle deformation

generation and propagation of a fault

Plastic deformation

permanent strain due to microscopic atomic motion

June 29, 2009 EURISPET 8

Processes controlling the “strength”

brittledeformation

ductiledeformation

June 29, 2009 EURISPET 9

Strength in the brittle regimeByerlee’s law

τ=τc+μfσn=τc+μfP

June 29, 2009 EURISPET 10

Ductile deformation by thermally activated processes

τ~1/n exp (G*/nRT)

G*: material dependent, P dependent (G*=E*+PV*-TS*)The rate depends on defect concentration.

G*

.

June 29, 2009 EURISPET 11

brittle versus plastic deformation

Sensitivity to brittle fracture (regime2 B2) plastic flow (regime2 A1) pressure temperature materials rate of deformation water content stress state1

~linear weak weak weak strong yes

~exponential strong (exponential) strong strong strong weak3

Material dependence (opx versus olivine)P-dependenceWater dependence

June 29, 2009 EURISPET 12

dept

h

dept

h

strength strength

ductile branch

ductile branch

June 29, 2009 EURISPET 13

homogeneous deformation

Rheology (of oceanic lithosphere) and mantle convection

(Tackley, 2000)

plate tectonics

stagnant lid

(Solomatov-Moresi, 1996, 1997)

June 29, 2009 EURISPET 14

Plate tectonics would not occur on Earth for this model.

Δρ⋅g⋅υ η⋅h3=&ε⋅τ⋅h3 τ1(~20MPa)<τ<τ2(~200MPa) : plate tectonics

τ1(~20MPa)>τ : homog. deformation

τ>τ2(~200MPa) : stagnant lid

energy release by subduction

energy dissipation by plate bending ⇔

(Kohlstedt et al., 1995)

plat

e t e

c to n

ics

June 29, 2009 EURISPET 15

How has a continental root survived?

~200 km thick continental lithosphere has survived for ~3Gyrs

June 29, 2009 EURISPET 16

In order to preserve the deep continental root, it must have a high viscosity (>10 -10 higher than the surrounding mantle).

Lenardic and Moresi (1999)

2 3

June 29, 2009 EURISPET 17

A conventional model(Kohlstedt et al., 1995)

Continental roots would be weaker than deep oceanic mantle --> continental roots would not have survived for this model.

June 29, 2009 EURISPET 18

A conventional model of lithosphere strength (Kohlstedt et al.,1995) fails to explain the most important features of geological processes: plate tectonics and long-term stability of continents.

What are wrong with that model ?

Limited experimental conditions (low pressure) Uncertainties in water content in the continental mantle

olivine-based model continental lithosphere was assumed to be “wet” water, P-effects are poorly constrained

June 29, 2009 EURISPET 19

needs for deformation experiments at higher P1. Deformation of minerals that are stable only at high P (opx, wadsleyite,

ringwoodite etc.)

2. Characterization of water and pressure effects

June 29, 2009 EURISPET 20

Deformation apparatus

Paterson apparatusP<0.5 GPa, T<1550 K

Rotational Drickamer apparatusP<17 GPa, T<2300 K

Griggs apparatusP<3 GPa, T<1600 K

Oceanic lithosphere: P to 3 GPa, T to 1500 K

Continental lithosphere: P to 10 GPa, T to 1700 K

June 29, 2009 EURISPET 21

Oceanic lithosphere(why plate tectonics on Earth?)

Oceanic lithosphere is (nearly) dry and cold.

brittle fracture + dry olivine (power-law creep) --> too strong

How can one make the lithosphere weak at low T (and dry)?

Plastic deformation is material sensitive.

Lithosphere is made of olivine + opx.

How about opx (orthopyroxene)?

Little previous studies on opx deformation.

Opx is stable only above ~1 GPa (at high T)

A conventional gas-apparatus can be used only below 0.5 GPa.

June 29, 2009 EURISPET 22

Plastic deformation of opx(Ohuchi and Karato, 2009)

Griggs apparatus (1.3 GPa, 973-1273 K)

CsCl pressure medium

Simple shear

With a small amount of water

June 29, 2009 EURISPET 23

(Ohuchi and Karato (2009))

opx

ol

opx

ol

June 29, 2009 EURISPET 24

(Ohuchi and Karato (2009)

strain

stre

ss

opx

June 29, 2009 EURISPET 25

Role of a weak opx on the strength of an oli + opx mixture

June 29, 2009 EURISPET 26

(Ohuchi and Karato (2009))

opx (IWL)-modelol (LBF)-model

June 29, 2009 EURISPET 27

How has a continental root survived?

(Kohlstedt model) Continental roots would be weaker than deep oceanic mantle --> continental roots would not have survived.Rheology of the deep continental roots.

June 29, 2009 EURISPET 28

Temperature difference?

Continent versus ocean: temperature difference

June 29, 2009 EURISPET 29

Causes for a strong continent

Temperature difference is too small.

Water content difference?

• Water enhances deformation.

• Continental upper mantle is “depleted”(large degree of partial melting).

• --> hardening of continental roots by partial melting?

June 29, 2009 EURISPET 30

Water weakening

low-P dataMei and Kohlstedt (2000)

water content -->

Str

ain

rate

June 29, 2009 EURISPET 31

partial melting removes water

“batch melting” CsCs0=kφ+1−φ()k≈1−1−kkφ (CsCm=k,φ: dgρ of m lτing)

“fρacτional m lτing” CsCs0=1−φ()1−kk≈exp−1−kkφ()≈1−1−kkφ

June 29, 2009 EURISPET 32

dept

h

strength

Quantify the water weakening effectQuantify the P-effect on dry rheology

June 29, 2009 EURISPET 33

Water weakeningneed to find a formula for extrapolation to high-pressures

low-P data (<0.45 GPa)Mei and Kohlstedt (2000)

June 29, 2009 EURISPET 34

&wet=A⋅σn⋅fH2OrP,T()⋅exp−E*+PV*RT( )∝η−1()

Data from a broad pressure range are needed to characterize the water effect.

fH2OrP,T() exp−E*+PV*RT( ) Mei-Kohlstedt

Karato-Jung

(Karato, 1989)

June 29, 2009 EURISPET 35

Pressure effects on creep strength of olivine (“wet”)

• Variation in the strength of olivine under “wet” conditions is different from that under “dry” conditions.

• The strength changes with P in a non-monotonic way.

• High-P data show much higher strength than low-P data would predict.

fugacity effect

V* effect

Karato and Jung (2003)

June 29, 2009 EURISPET 36

A two-parameter (r, V*) equationfits nicely to the data.

&wet=A⋅fH2OrP,T()⋅exp−E*+PV*RT( ) Karato and Jung (2003)

June 29, 2009 EURISPET 37

Need to know “dry” rheology to evaluate the effect of de-watering

&≈&wetCW()+&εdry ξ=ηfinal()ηinitial()=&εCWcont()&εCW0()

The degree of hardening due to de-watering depends on &εwetCW,T,P( ) and &εdryT,P().

June 29, 2009 EURISPET 38

High-P deformation

gas-medium apparatusP<0.5 GPa, T<1550 K

Rotational Drickamer apparatusP to 17 GPa, T<2300 K

Griggs apparatusP<3 GPa, T<1600 K

June 29, 2009 EURISPET 39

RDA (rotational Drickamer apparatus)1. High P-T (good support, nearly homogeneous T (P))2. Large strain (torsion tests)3. Relatively large sample size (broad range of grain-size)

June 29, 2009 EURISPET 40

Synchrotron facility at Brookhaven National Lab

June 29, 2009 EURISPET 41

Strain measurements by X-ray imaging

June 29, 2009 EURISPET 42

Incident X-ray

Geometry of X-ray diffraction for the rotational Drickamer apparatus

Diffracted X-ray

2

Observed part

June 29, 2009 EURISPET 43

wadsleyite

June 29, 2009 EURISPET 44

(dry) olivine, deformation

Important to conduct high-P experiments (low-P experiments are not useful even though they are high-resolution).

Kawazoe et al. (2009)

June 29, 2009 EURISPET 45

Hardening due to de-watering (ΔT=0)

ocea

nic,

wed

ge m

antle

cont

inen

tal l

ithos

pher

e

June 29, 2009 EURISPET 46

June 29, 2009 EURISPET 47

Summary-I

In order to obtain critical data on the rheological properties from experimental studies, one needs to conduct deformation experiments beyond ~1 GPa. With a pure olivine lithosphere, plate tectonics is difficult to operate: opx may weaken the lithosphere to allow plate tectonics to operate. The de-watering in the deep upper mantle can increase the viscosity ~10 - 10 times that would stabilize the continental roots.

2 3

June 29, 2009 EURISPET 48

Summary-II(issues to be studied further)

Role of opx in an opx+ol mixture: experimental study on deformation of an opx-ol mixture, study of naturally deformed rocks Is the continental lithosphere really “dry”? Does subduction help growth of continents or destroy them?

June 29, 2009 EURISPET 49

Conditions for the survival of continental roots

June 29, 2009 EURISPET 50

volume fraction of fine-grained region (%)

mod

al fr

actio

n

Peridotite from the shear zone (Italy)

opx ribbon

June 29, 2009 EURISPET 51

water

June 29, 2009 EURISPET 52

Big Mantle Wedge (BMW) model (Zhao et al., 2004)

Big Mantle Wedge

(1) Shallow & deep slab dehydration (Ohtani et al., 2004); (2) Corner flow (convection) in the Big Mantle Wedge; (3) Thinning & fracture of the continental lithosphere; (4) Upwelling of the asthenospheric

materials to form the intraplate volcanoes.

June 29, 2009 EURISPET 53

Topography

Vp tomography at 600 km depth

Huang & Zhao (2006) JGR

Bouguer gravity

North-South gravity lineament

Ma (1989); Xu (2007)

The western edge of the stagnant slab roughly coincides with the surface topographic boundary & NSGL.

The stagnant slab has affected the surface structure and tectonics?

June 29, 2009 EURISPET 54

Zhao (2004)   PEPI 146, 3-34.

Global mantle tomography

June 29, 2009 EURISPET 55

Deformation mechanism map

June 29, 2009 EURISPET 56

Ductile rheology

• Plastic deformation in minerals occurs due to the thermally activated motion of crystalline defects. σ=σ&,T,P:X( )

X= composition (water, Fe/Mg), grain-size σ∝&ε1nexpE*+PV*nRT() ‡ strength in the ductile regime depends on T, P, strain-rate (+ composition (water content), grain-size)

June 29, 2009 EURISPET 57

• Rate of deformation (strain-rate)

(density of defect)*(velocity of defect motion)

(velocity of defect motion) (driving force [stress])*(mobility)

(mobility) exp[-H(σ,C)/RT]: depends on mechanisms

(density of defect): function of T, σ, C: depends on mechanisms

Many mechanisms exist for plastic deformation.

-> “strength” depends on mechanisms.

∝∝

June 29, 2009 EURISPET 58

(Ohuchi and Karato (2009)

June 29, 2009 EURISPET 59

(Ohuchi and Karato (2009)