JUDGES TEMPORARY REFERRAL POLICY

December 22, 2010

At its November 2010 meeting, the AKC Board passed the Judges Temporary Referral Policy. Effective January 1, 2011, the Judges Temporary Referral Policy will apply to all AKC judges, including Companion Events, Conformation, and Performance Events. In conjunction with the policy, all judges’ applications effective January 1, 2011, will include additional certification language as listed in this announcement. Should you have any questions or concerns please contact the Judging Operations Department.

Judges Temporary Referral PolicyThe Board reviewed a staff proposed policy to permit AKC to place a hold on an AKC approved judge’s eligibility to judge or to accept assignments in abeyance on a temporary basis, pending the outcome of certain criminal charges. The AKC Board VOTED (unanimously) to approve a Judges’ Temporary Referral policy, effective January 1, 2011. The new policy follows:

When an AKC-approved judge is charged by a government entity with cruelty, inhumane treatment of animals, or similar offense involving inhumane or cruel treatment of dogs, or charged by a government entity with any crime involving moral turpitude, especially as it concerns dog related activities, AKC may temporarily place the judge on referral, which would have the effect of temporarily holding the judge’s approval to judge or accept assignments in abeyance. The purpose of this procedure is to prevent the judge from judging or from accepting assignments to judge while the charges are pending. If and when the charges are resolved and AKC’s inquiry into the matter determines that no action will be taken by the AKC to cause a suspension of judging privileges, the temporary judging referral will be removed.

In conjunction with the policy, beginning January 1, 2011, all judges’ applications will contain the following certification:

I certify that I understand and acknowledge that if I am charged with cruelty, inhumane treatment of animals, or similar offense involving inhumane or cruel treatment of dogs, or charged with any crime involving moral turpitude, especially as it concerns dog-related activities, the AKC may temporarily place my judging privileges on referral while the charges are pending. Further, after receiving notification of the referral, I am prevented from judging or from accepting assignments to judge. When the charges are resolved and AKC’s inquiry into the matter determines that no action will be taken by the AKC to cause a suspension of my judging privileges, the temporary judging referral will be removed.

– John P. Wade D irector, Judging Operations

Judging Operations Department8051 Arco Corporate DriveRaleigh, NC 27617-2010(919) 816-3880judgingops@kc.org

Winter 2011Volume 12

Number 47

TH

E A

KC

NE

WS

LE

TT

ER

FO

R C

ON

FO

RM

AT

ION

JU

DG

ES

The new questionnaires will be available for all judges applying for approval beginning on April 1, 2011. These new questionnaires contain the language for the judge’s temporary referral policy that goes into effect on January 1, 2011.

THE STANDARD2

The Judging Operations

Department is aware of the

increasing demand for use of

available technology through cell

phones, I-Pads, Kindles and other

reading devices as a reference tool.

We are reviewing the current policy

found within the Rules, Policies and

Guidelines for Conformation Dog

Show Judges that states, “Cell Phones

and other electronic devices must be

turned off while judging. Telephone

calls should never be made or received

by either the judge or the ring

steward while in the ring.” Judging

Operations will notify the judging

community at the point in time that

any change in policy has been made.

Judges should adhere to the current

policy until further notice.

THE USE OFAvailable

TECHNOLOGYIN THIS ISSUE~

Temporary Referral Policy .................... Front Cover

The Use of Available Technology .......................... 2

Executive Field Representative BiosSue Vroom… ........................................................ 3

Tommy Glassford ................................................. 5

Parent Club - Breed StandardEnglish Cocker Spaniel Club of America .............. 4

Redbone Coonhound Association of America ........................................................ 5

Akita Club of America .......................................... 6

Lowchen Club of America .................................... 6

Bearded Collie Club of America ............................ 9

From the Field Reps“ What to do if you Need to Cancel or Delay Arrival” ................................... 3

As I See It ........................................................... 10

“Improprieties and Perceptions” ......................... 12

Don’t MissAdjunct Announcement ....................................... 4

When to Measure ................................................. 8

AKC Political Action Committee ..........................11

A Letter from an Exhibitor .................................. 12

Upcoming Seminars and Institutes ........ Back Cover

Contents

3THE STANDARD

Since attending her first dog show at the age of four, the Orange Empire Dog Club in San Bernardino, California, Sue has been an active member of the dog community. Her background encompasses a wide variety of exposures on different levels.

At age 18, she purchased a promising young English Springer Spaniel from the successful breeding kennel Whitney’s Ranch on the advice of professional handler, Ray McGinnis. This led to not only a long-standing mentoring relationship with Ray to begin her handling career, but later in time, a position as kennel manager at Whitney’s, overseeing the breeding program and assisting in the dogs’ show careers. In 1981, Sue married Corky; a partnership that included the successful career piloting of many nationwide winners in all seven groups. Over the years, she has very much enjoyed show-chairing conformation events for the Southern Bouvier Club, the Southern California Tibetan Terrier Association as well as judging special events and presenting handling and grooming seminars in three different countries.

In addition to being a professional handler, Sue has been the breeder and/or owner of champions in five different Groups. Three of those breeds turned out to be Group, Best in Show and National Specialty winners.

Since she and her husband’s retirement in February 2005, Sue has enjoyed employment as an Executive Field Representative in Texas.

Sue’s son, Aaron, resides in California and is a Senior Vice-President in Secondary Banking for Bank of America.

Susan Vroom

What to do if you need to cancel or delay arrival for an assignment?• Contact the Show Chairperson as soon as possible. The longer you delay calling the Show Chairperson the harder it

becomes to find a replacement judge, especially in the remote rural areas.

• If the Show Chairperson is not available, try to contact the Superintendent, Show Secretary, or Judging Operations at AKC.

• Always make sure you leave a phone number where you can be contacted.

• If your flight is delayed make sure the Show Chairperson knows, because in some situations a replacement judge can do your assignment until you arrive, or it might be delayed until you arrive. Keeping those people picking you up at the airport updated on travel information during your travel day is important. Let them know if your flight is delayed or cancelled.

• If you are delayed and are sharing transportation with other judges on the panel let them know so they can make other plans.

• Keep all club correspondence with phone numbers on your person while traveling. NEVER place this information inside checked luggage.

• Dog Show Judges are very resilient, but if you become ill consider your health and safety before making a trip to the dog show. Not feeling well can make one grouchy and complain about everything….exhibitors deserve a well rested, feeling well and happy judge EVERY TIME……

– Anne Katona & Allen Odom Judge/AKC Executive Field Representative

The judging of a provisional Low Entry breed in a group will count as an assignment.

The current “Low Entry” breed list determines which breeds are eligible for consideration.

Provisional judges are responsible to keep track of groups they judge where these breeds have actually competed and include that experience with their request for regular status. Please be advised the request for regular status form

has been revised, to include group judging only for those “Low Entry Breeds”.

Judging the Group or Best In Show could be counted as an assignment on low entry breeds, if they occurred on different dates other than the breed assignment. (Judging the breed and Group/Best in Show on the

same day for “Low Entry Breeds” does not count as two (2) assignments.)

Provisional Assignments – Low Entry Breeds

THE STANDARD4

The Breed Education Committee and breeder-judges of English Cocker Spaniels have noticed an increase in the number of questions regarding acceptable color and markings. In order to provide information on color and markings in accordance with the Breed Standard, this clarification was drafted by the Committee.

The English Cocker Spaniel standard states under Color – “Various.”; then goes on to list the acceptable colors and markings in the breed.

The AKC guidelines (1994, amended 2006) for writing breed standards states: “In breeds where multiple colors or color combinations are acceptable, but not all colors are permitted, the complete list of all acceptable colors and color combinations must be included in the standard. In such cases,

any color or color combinations not mentioned are unacceptable, and judges are to pass judgment on this basis.”

Please keep in mind when judging this breed, that color patterns occurring in breeds outside the Sporting group, such as brindle or sable, etc., are not described in the English Cocker Spaniel Breed Standard as they are neither parti-color (ticked, roaned, or open marked, with or without tan points) nor solid color (with or without tan points).

Issued by the E.C.S.C.A. Breed Education Committee and approved by the Board of Directors of the English Cocker Spaniel Club of America, Inc.

Issue Date: October 12, 2010

The following breeds will be eligible for competition in regular breed classes on June 30, 2011. The American English Coonhounds will be accepted into the Hound Group, Cesky Terriers will be accepted into the Terrier Group and the Finnish Lapphunds into the Herding Group.

All Breed, Hound, Terrier and Herding Group judges will receive automatic approval to judge these breeds at shows held after June 30, 2011. Passing grades on these exams is expected, two or more missed questions will need to be reviewed with Executive Field Staff. Additional breed applications submitted

for the balance of the Hound, Terrier and Herding Groups received prior to June 29, 2011 will automatically include these breeds providing applicants pass the breed standard tests.

Individuals wishing to apply using the Adjunct Method must submit an application and a processing fee. Judging Operations will start accepting applications between January 10, 2011 and June 29, 2011. Those who miss the deadline must apply under the current system. Applications are available on the website or by contacting Judging Operations.

Clarification of English Cocker Spaniel Colors From the English Cocker Spaniel Club of America

American English Coonhounds, Cesky Terriers and Finnish Lapphunds

APPLY UNDER THE ADJUNCT SYSTEM

AKC approved judges who can demonstrate significant background in the breed may apply to judge under the Adjunct System. Examples of “significant background” would be:

• Experience in owning, breeding, exhibiting and handling the breed.

• Background in judging multiple events with a significant number of entries.

First time applicants must have 10-12 years breeding experience, take and pass the Procedural and Anatomy Exams, have judged at AKC or Non-AKC events at least six times and stewarded at least 6 times at AKC® member or licensed events. (Procedural and Anatomy Exams must be requested through Judging Operations and submitted with application).

Applicants who meet these requirements may apply by requesting an application from Judging Operations in North Carolina at 919-816-3588 or judgingops@akc.org. Application may also be downloaded from www.akc.org/judges/conformation/.

THE STANDARD 5

From the Redbone Coonhound Asssociation of AmericaTM

With the Redbone Coonhounds being recognized and actively showing for a year now, the RCAA would like to thank all the judges in helping to make this a prosperous year for our hounds.

As the New Year begins, the Parent Club would like to highlight some of the important parts of our Breed’s Standard. Redbones are a working hound. We wish to ensure that they do not lose the ability to perform their duties now that they are able to show in the conformation world of AKC.

Redbones are a medium sized hound with medium bone and should always be in proportion. Awards should not be solely based on size. We have witnessed the larger dog prevail even though they are not the most square and proportioned in the ring. Please remember, larger does not mean better. A larger hound is less likely to withstand a hard night of hunting rather than the mid-size hound, which is why the standard calls for Mid-Range preferred. The standard reads 22-27 males and 21-26 females, mid-range preferred. They should be 50% body to 50% leg. They should be equal in length and height resulting in a square hound. Chest deep and reaching to at least the elbow allowing ample lung capacity is a must. Top line level with a slight arch in the loin. The top line should not be sloping, as in some sporting breeds, or taller in the rear than the shoulder. To perform their duties they must have the correct gear and size to last through a night in the woods.

The Redbone should always be red in color, as the approved standard states, “flashy red coat”. It seems media would want us to believe they are to always have a black muzzle. The black muzzle is permitted, not preferred. Snippy, pointy muzzles should be avoided. Ears to be long, set moderately low and should be firmly attached to the

skull and not to appear like loose skin.

Questions concerning the tail-set and carriage are frequent. Tail set should be mid-croup and never appear to be set on the back. Tails may be carried from level to upright, never carried over the back reaching the point of entry or curled. The saber-like tail references the shape of the tail, not how it is to be carried.

When evaluating movement, be aware of incorrect tendencies such as elbowing or crossing over. You may find an entry of excellent side movement less than desirable in the front and rear, as a result lacking the desired running gear.

Lastly, the Redbones are to possess a laid-back, gentle temperament unless hunting and should present themselves accordingly in the ring. A lack of animation and weariness of strangers is to be expected, but should not appear scared. Excessive shyness is not desirable and should be excused.

The direction of our breed is in your hands. We advise the withholding of ribbons to those entries lacking of merit. We prefer our breed to remain consistent with our standard; medium hound, square in numerous aspects, with a strikingly beautiful red coat and easy going attitude.

Upcoming seminars as well as the Judge’s Guide can be found on our website, www.redbonecaa.com. The JEC would be happy to answer any questions or offer to mentor anyone interested.

Redbone Seminar: March 20th in conjunction with the Louisville, KY cluster event.

Tom was born into dogs. His father was a breeder of Irish Setters and an early client of Tom Crowe, who Tom eventually apprenticed under, following his time as a junior handler.

He received an AKC license to handle dogs in 1958, and was a four-time Quaker Oats winner. He had Best In Show or Specialty Best In Show wins in over fifty breeds and Group One wins in over ninety. Prior to retirement from the ring, he and his wife, Andrea, averaged approximately 150 Group Ones each year. As breeder/owners, they have bred or owned BIS, Group, or Specialty BIS winners in Pointers, Irish Setters, German Shorthaired Pointers, Elkhounds, Greyhounds, Afghans, Poodles, English Cockers, Australian Cattle Dogs, and English Springer Spaniels.

He is a former director of the Dog Handler’s Guild and a charter member of the Certified Professional Handler Association. In his spare time he has also bred and trained several stakes-winning Thoroughbred horses. He continues to enjoy his work with the horses when he has time at home.

Tom was instrumental in the formation of the AKC Registered Handlers Program and has coordinated countless RHP Juniors Clinics since 2003.

Tom Glassford

THE STANDARD6

It has been brought to the attention of the Lowchen Club of America Board of Directors and Judges Education Chair of the discussion regarding the Lion Clip and whether it is acceptable to extend or shorten the clipped area at the rib.

The Lowchen Club of America and its members have described in detail the Lion Clip and felt that it was important enough to make it the breed’s only disqualification.

The standard states very clearly that the clipped area should be “From the last rib”. It does not give a variance of any amount.

It also states: “Any clip other than specified or any shaping or scissoring of the long coat are disqualifications”.

With the understanding that everyone’s grooming skills are not equal, a wiggly puppy or a new comer to the breed, there should not be a large variance between each dogs clip. So to

answer your question, if an exhibitor has modified the clip and in so doing, attempted to disguise a fault of the individual dog, or scissored the unclipped areas, the dog should be disqualified.

Thank you for bringing this to our attention. We applaud you for wanting a better understanding of and judging to the standard. Should you have further concerns or questions, please feel free to contact our board at any time.

Respectfully,

– Lowchen Club of America Board of Directors and Susa Williams, Chair of Judges Education

It does when you’re dealing with breed standards that have a size disqualification. Here’s a case in point. Does a 6-month old puppy need to be the size stated in the breed standard? Absolutely if you are talking about Akitas and the Akita breed standard! Every Akita that is being shown, regardless of class must be the minimum height stated in the Standard. It really isn’t a question about whether or not you want to use the puppy. It’s really about applying the Standard. A judge is thus obligated to measure the Akita if he/she thinks it might be under sized. If after you call for the wicket and measure the puppy, it does not reach the minimum height, then, it must be disqualified. The Akita standard lists only five reasons for disqualifying an exhibit. Included in those is a minimum height which is 23 inches at the withers for bitches and 25 inches for dogs. The Standard does include an ideal height range, which for dogs are 26-28 inches and 24-26 inches for bitches.

The Akita Club of America’s Judges Education Committee makes it very clear in their seminars that all dogs, regardless of class, must meet the minimum size when being shown. It makes no distinction between puppies and adults. It is not a question of the puppy’s eventual height; it is about judging the puppy on that day and applying the Standard. Likewise, the owner/handler should be just as educated and knowledgeable about the Standard as the judge is and know that a DQ could result if the puppy or adults they show are under the minimum size.

The Akita is a dignified large breed dog with 5 disqualifications in the standard. They are easily remembered by using the word BENTS as a mnemonic:

B = BITE, undershot or overshot

E = EARS, dropped or broken

N = NOSE, partial or total lack of pigmentation on nose surface

T = TAIL, sickle or uncurled, and

S = SIZE, under 23 inches for bitches and under 25 inches for dogs

The Akita standard has changed only once (May 17, 2009) since it was approved in 1973. The change served to clarify language about the disqualifications and other points of the Standard. The disqualifications themselves did not change. Judges should not award points to any dog that is not of the correct size. We ask that you simply apply the Standard, and if in doubt, measure.

– Rebecca Kestle, DVM – Akita Club of America JEC Member

– Sophia Kaluzniacki, DVM – Akita Club of America JEC Member

– Sylvia Thomas, Akita Club of America JEC Chair

Confusion About the AkitA stAndArd

Does size really matter?

To whom it may concern:

THE STANDARD 7

I started in the world of dogs in 1950, with Collies. I showed in breed and obedience. In 1958, I purchased my first Sheltie. She had her first and only litter in 1961. In that litter, she had a 2nd in Futurity winner, who won a major on her 9 month birthday. In 1965, I purchased another bitch that became the dam of 4 Champions. In 1968, a Male Champion was born, in 1974, a bitch Champion was born and these two remained here, and produced a bitch Champion and a male with 12 points. In limited breeding we also had a male with 13 points, a male with 6 points, and one with 4 points. We also had many Reserves (major). In 1960, I was approved to judge Collies, in 1962, Shelties, and Jr. Showmanship. I held a Handler’s license for 5 years before judging. I also taught Novice Obedience for 15 years. I occasionally have a litter of pups. Always looking for the “perfect” dog.

Louella Ericksen

I started in purebred dogs in 1946 at the age of 14 with a Collie. I bred several litters of Collies until 1952 when I purchased my first Shetland Sheepdog. Up until now, I have bred or owned 113 Champions, many Group and Best in Show winners as well. I started judging in 1958 with Collies and Shelties and added several Working and Herding breeds later.

I have judged many Specialties in many breeds including the Sheltie National in 1975, Santa Barbara in the 80’s and Palm Springs as well as shows in Canada and Mexico. I still judge but do not like to be away from my family too often, my wife of 52 years, Bobbie, our two sons, two daughters and our seven grandchildren.

DonCombee

FAQ’s Grand Champion Questions1. Can I ask exhibitors if their Non-Regular class winners are Champions? NO, judges nor ring stewards should ever ask questions

nor make determinations about eligibility. The determination of eligibility is made solely by the AKC. 2. Are judges required to award select awards? YES, judges are expected to actively participate in the Grand Championship program.

It is an official AKC program with awards offered at all conformation dog shows. Judges are to evaluate all eligible winners for dogs deserving of Grand Champion points on that day. The actual awarding of points is solely up to the judge.

3. I am not awarding any select awards; can I leave that section blank in the judge’s book? NO, you must write N/A which denotes that you have judged the dogs present and do not deem any worthy of Grand Champion points on that day.

4. Do Non-Regular classes count in figuring Grand Champion Points? Veteran dogs or any other non-regular class dogs are not counted in determining points. All eligible entrants from non-regular classes can earn Grand Championship points.

5. With National Specialties and Awards of Merit, how does Select fit in? The Select award is governed by the Rules Applying to Dog Shows and results recorded by AKC. The Award of Merit is governed by the host club with the eligibility and number awarded determined by the club. The criteria for Awards of Merit should be printed in the premium list. The order of awards should be Best of Breed, Best of Winners, Best Opposite Sex, Select Dog and Bitch followed by Award of Merit winners. Please ask the host club if they would like the Award of Merit and the Select to be given to the same dog or have the Award of Merit winners start after the Select winners.

Click here to view: Grand Champion – Judges Book Sample, Grand Champion Judging Procedure, Grand Champion Explanation for Exhibitors and Judges, Grand Champion Judging Sequence

R 50 Years of Judging R

THE STANDARD8

Effective Immediately:The Xoloitzcuintli Club of America has approved and requested that their breed be separated in three sizes – Standard, Miniature and Toy. They have approved that the Open Classes be divided as such, since there is a significant difference in each sizes gait. They have also approved that the Toys and Miniatures be examined on the table while the Standard, because of their size and weight continue to be examined on the ground.

– Bobby W. Birdsong Director of AKC Event Operations

A judge may only measure dogs if the standard includes a height disqualification or if there is a class or division with a height specification. Therefore, in order to measure breeds such as the American Eskimo or the Xoloitzcuintli that have size categories, either the class must be divided by size or the dog is suspected of being outside the proper limits for disqualification. Class divisions may occur at specialties or at all breed shows where the club has requested the division and printed it in their Premium List.

For purposes of this article, we will use the Xolo, one of AKC’s newest breeds which will be included in the Non-Sporting Group as of January 1, 2011. Unlike the Beagle and the Poodle, they are not automatically shown and judged as different varieties by height.

The Xolo includes three size categories: Toy at least 10" including 14", Miniature over 14" including 18", Standard over 18" including 23". In order to measure the sizes, there must be official class divisions for each of the 3 sizes. If a dog is measured out of the class in which it is entered, it should be excused, and the judges’ book marked, “measured out, ineligible” and initialed.

As with all breeds whose standards include disqualifications for size, judges may measure for the DQ in any class. The Xolo disqualification is under 10" or over 24". In this case if a dog is measured out, the judges’ book is marked, “measured out, disqualified” and initialed. When a judge is measuring due to a protest by an exhibitor who must be in the ring at the time, these same guidelines apply except that the protest must be made before all the dogs in the ring are individually examined and gaited.

Toy and Miniature Xolo’s are table dogs, Standards are ground/floor breeds. Dogs normally examined on the ground should only be measured on the ground. Dogs normally examined on a table should only be measured on the table. Xolo’s are not examined on a ramp.

Be sure to check the most recent Ramp/Table Breeds list on the AKC website as this list is updated regularly.

It is important to remember that when a standard includes a DQ, the parent club considers size so important that it created the DQ. Therefore, judges have an obligation to verify that dogs in their ring are within that standard.

Occasionally a sweepstakes (or futurity) judge will want to verify height on an entry of a measurable breed, and may do so. That judge may not disqualify in non-regular classes, however, if a dog measures out, the dog should be excused and the book marked, “measured out – ineligible” and initialed. The act of measuring in a non-regular class does not inhibit a regular class judge from measuring the same exhibit at that show.

For additional information on measuring, please refer to “Rules Applying To Dog Shows”, Chapter 14, for information on the wicket please refer to “Rules, Policies and Guidelines for Conformation Dog Show Judges”. Your local AKC Executive Field Representative is available to answer questions at any show.

– Lee Whittier Judge

WHEN TO MEASURE

THE STANDARD 9

The dilemma that faces the JEC of the Bearded Collie Club of America is how to resolve the issue of trimming in our NATURAL breed. The breeders have to rely on judges to adhere to the approved breed standard, which clearly states (three times) that scissoring is a severe fault. Should a judge award the ribbon to a lesser quality Beardie that is not trimmed or award the ribbon to one that has a man-made fault?

The problem is not only a few trimmed dogs, but is exacerbated when exhibitors who are new to the sport copy the winners assuming that is the only way to win. It is bad enough that we have to deal with teasing and sprays, but now we are seeing dogs sculpted to the degree they no longer resemble the natural dog that the Bearded Collie was meant to be. This is clearly opposed to the standard.

Judges’ may excuse an exhibitor with a teased, artificially parted or sprayed dog in accordance with the breed standard and/or the Rules Applying to Dog Shows.

We ask you to consider the natural dog first and to penalize the dog that is trimmed to the extent of withholding ribbons for artificially changing

the appearance of the dog. This appears to be the only method by which we can halt the sculpting of our breed. If the dog is correct, he/she will not need trimming.

We look the other way for tidying up the feet or else some dogs would be wearing “snow shoes” in the ring. However, it now appears that neatening of the entire Beardie has been taken to the extreme and has progressed to the characteristic beard, ears, tails, underline etc.

It is a hard decision to make, but the onus to uphold our standard is placed on the judges shoulders. Please stop this runaway train before it derails. Please stop this trend before we no longer recognize our breed!

Sincerely,

Judges Education CommitteeBearded Collie Club of America

Correction to the Cane Corso Breed StandardAt the October 2010 meeting of the AKC Board of Directors, the correction to the Disqualification for the Tail Section of the Breed Standard was approved.

The standard will now read:

Disqualification: A natural tail that is atrophied or a natural tail that is knotted and laterally deviated or twisted.

Click here to view the entire Cane Corso Breed Standard

to all Bearded Collie, Herding and BIS Judges:

Icelandic SheepdogThe Icelandic Sheepdog Association of America reminds us that the Icelandic Sheepdog is NOT a table or ramp breed and therefore, MUST be judged on the ground.

Memo to Junior Showmanship JudgesAs per the request of the Basset Hound Club of America, please be advised that it is recommended that the ramp be utilized for the examination of Basset Hounds in Junior Showmanship competition when available. By Board approved policy, Basset Hounds are expected to be judged on the ramp during breed judging

Items to Note

Click here to view the current list of Table and Ramp BreedsPlease note breeds that do not appear on the List of Table and Ramp Breeds, MUST be judged on the ground.

THE STANDARD10

Recently, a conversation with a judge friend of mine sparked an idea. We were commenting on the wealthy resource of

experienced judges we have and how greatly beneficial it would be for newer judges to have the opportunity and advantage of being able to “pick the brain” of those having so much judging experience. Our AKC newsletter reaches the entire AKC judging community and is a natural forum for education, information and the opportunity to mentor and be mentored. Using the format of question and answer, each issue will feature a judge we invite to answer a question in the hopes that it may have educational value to our core of newly approved judges and maybe even those not so new.

With the greatest respect for those with time served wearing the badge, the column is entitled “As I See It,” and I look forward to their answers and opinions.

Mrs. Mildred Bryant of Denton, Texas is the featured columnist this month. Mildred has been involved in dogs and dog shows since childhood and has been judging since 1969. She is approved for the Working, Terrier, Toy, Non-Sporting, Herding Groups and Best in Show. Among the many National Specialties and wonderful assignments she has enjoyed through the years, one of her fondest memories was adjudicating the Terrier Group at the Westminster KC.

When asked, all judges will answer that the primary consideration is to find the “best” specimen in the ring based on breed standard requirement regardless of exhibitor presentation.

Should judges give lenient consideration in restricted classes where an age or exhibitor’s experience level may challenge one’s ability to do that? Should the expectation of finding and awarding breed virtue be the same in a 6-9 month age class as the Best of Breed class? How and when does “on the day” come into consideration?

Given the fact that one has approximately two minutes to make this determination, how much does superior show condition and expert presentation in the ring influence a judge’s decision in finding the best dog?

– Sue VroomAKC Executive Field Representative

As I See It Mrs. Mildred Bryant of Denton, Texas

is the featured columnist this month.

When I started judging in the late sixties, a very respected judge told me he looked for his winners in the open class. Well, that may work for some judges – but I look for my winners in the winner’s class. And that puppy, youngster, bred-by, am bred, open, which ever, has an equal chance for points or breed. I will admit, I like to see nicely conditioned, well presented dogs. However, that is not my deciding factor. Type, to me, comes first. They must look like the breed they represent. Often, in large classes that first go around the ring, several catch my eye. Maybe not exactly how I will line up 1-2-3-4, but I have an idea which ones will be in final consideration.Often my hands tell me a lot while examining the structure of the dog. This examination, plus the down and back tell me whether the dog can do the job he was bred to do; be it retrieving, hunting, guarding, herding, going to ground, or just sitting in a lap.“On the Day” makes a big difference in selecting any award. So often exhibitors think once a judge awards a dog it will be his choice forever. Dogs have good and bad days, just like people. Also the competition changes each show so the entry may be up against better specimens.To sum it up, TYPE and STRUCTURE are most important in my awards and each dog in the ring has an equal chance for points or breed.P.S. I do like HAPPY dogs!

Most sincerely,Mildred K. Bryant

Should judges give lenient consideration in restricted classes where an age or exhibitor’s experience level may challenge one’s ability to do that?

THE STANDARD 11

Over the past two years, the AKC Government Relations Department (AKC GR) has seen a vast increase in the number of bills that would infringe on our right to own, breed, and exhibit dogs.

In 2009- 2010, AKC GR tracked over 2,000 pieces of legislation affecting dog owners. Key concerns include mandatory spay/neuter laws, ownership limits, ear cropping/tail docking bans, warrantless kennel searches and seizures and breed ownership bans — and anti-dog extremists aren’t giving up! More of the same restrictions are being proposed by animal extremists and lawmakers for 2011.

The AKC’s Government Relations Department is dedicated to supporting the efforts of local clubs and doing all we can to stop bad dog laws from passing, but we can’t do it alone. Contributing to the American Kennel Club Political Action Committee (AKC PAC) is a simple, effective way for you to enhance the efforts of the AKC, AKC state federations, and local clubs who are in the trenches fighting to ensure that we and future generations can continue to enjoy the right to own and exhibit the dogs we love.

What is the AKC PAC?The American Kennel Club Political Action Committee is a fund comprised of donations from individuals who take a stand to support of the rights of responsible dog owners in legislation. One hundred percent of AKC PAC donations go directly to the campaigns of candidates across the United States who share our commitment to preserving and defending these rights.

Decisions about which candidates receive AKC PAC funds are made by the AKC PAC Board, which reviews recommendations from AKC staff, members of the fancy, AKC state federations, and others concerned with canine legislation. Funds may be donated to incumbents who have supported dog owners and breeders, or new candidates who have pledged their commitment to preserving dog owners’ rights.

Political Action Committees are important tools that help organizations provide extra support to political candidates and officeholders who share their views. By supporting political leaders who share our values, the AKC PAC can help ensure that our concerns are heard when canine legislation is being considered. Many organizations (including many animal rights groups) have established PACs to give money to political campaigns. PACs are a tangible way of showing support to candidates and encouraging their continued support for your issues.

For the AKC, a strong, effective PAC sends the powerful message that dog owners will hold their representatives accountable for how they vote on dog issues, and that we stand behind leaders who share our beliefs.

Who Can Contribute?Anyone can contribute to the AKC PAC, so long as they follow specific guidelines set out by the Federal Elections Commission (FEC). The FEC only allows PACs to receive contributions from individual members of AKC clubs, which means that a club or organization cannot write a check directly from their account. There are still many ways, however, for you and your colleagues to contribute to this cause. Here are just a few suggestions:

• Host a club fundraiser for the PAC• Place a check-off box with a suggested PAC donation on

your club’s dues renewal form

Contributions, which are not tax-deductible, may be made online at www.akc.org/PAC or by mail. Downloadable contribution forms are also available at www.akc.org/PAC or by contacting the AKC Government Relations Department.

Although PACs can sound intimidating, they are a great way to ensure that lawmakers hear your voice. AKC GR has a variety of materials available to help you better understand the PAC, explain it to your colleagues, and easily make a contribution. These materials are available through the AKC website or contacting the AKC Government Relations office.

Now is the time for all responsible dog owners, breeders, fanciers, and judges to take a united stand in support of our dogs and our rights to own, breed, and exhibit them. The more dog-friendly legislators that are in office, the more likely it is that these rights are protected. Thanks to the generosity of numerous individuals, AKC PAC was able to contribute to nearly 60 campaigns in the 2010 elections. But the fight is not over! Candidates will begin fundraising again very soon, and it is essential that they know that responsible dog owners will hold their representatives accountable for how they vote on dog issues, and that they stand behind leaders who share our beliefs.

– Jennifer Clark, AKC Government Relations Department

For more information, visit the AKC PAC web site at www.akc.org/pac. You may also contact the AKC Government Relations Department at (919) 816-3720 or akcpac@akc.org.

AKC PAC Helps Fanciers Support Dog-Friendly Legislators

Our rights as responsible dog owners are under attack.

THE STANDARD12

As an AKC judge, it is YOUR responsibility to remain above board and keep your integrity in tact at all times, over the course of attending a dog show. Several situations have been brought to my attention throughout the year which prompted me to comment on them. And, even though, the perception of impropriety may be obvious to most of you, there have been times, where certain poor judgments in behavior have been flagrantly displayed for enough people to bring their concerns to my attention.

The first scenario takes place at a judge’s dinner. This particular instance took place at a public restaurant in close proximity to the dog show grounds. It involved several judges and show committee members as well as the Show Chairman. Allegedly, the judges spoke about their day and in doing so, unfortunately described several dogs that they had judged that day negatively to judges that were possibly judging the same dogs the following day. This conversation was for the entire duration of the dinner. In addition to this unacceptable behavior, the Show Chairman happens to be campaigning a dog this year. Allegedly, she promoted the dog to each and every judge at the table for the duration of the dinner. Allegedly, each and every judge at the table each boasted about what wins they had awarded the Show Chairman’s dog throughout the year. Shocking? In and of itself, yes. The problem beyond the obvious was that since the restaurant was near the show ground, most of the diners were dog show exhibitors, owners, handlers, and I’ll toss in a couple of stewards. How would you perceive this discussion?? What is your perception of the situation?

To quote the Rules, Policies and Guideline Judges Book, “AKC judges possess and project a commitment to integrity and ethical behavior that insures the reputation of AKC dog shows as fair and well judged. With common sense, judges can easily avoid situations which might raise ethical questions.”

The next scenario is similar to the first, in that it too, took place at a public restaurant in close proximity

to the show grounds. Allegedly, two judges were having dinner with two exhibitor/handlers, who had shown to the two judges that same day. And, of course, there were other exhibitor/handlers dining in the same restaurant at the same time. Allegedly, the judge/exhibitor/handler table’s discussion revolved around the various wins that were bestowed on them that same day. Allegedly, the exhibitor/handler’s conversations at the various tables throughout the restaurant were also on the numerous winnings of those at the judge’s tables.

As stated in the Rules, Policies and Guidelines for Conformation Dog Show Judges, “Take care to avoid even the appearance of impropriety with any fancier who might appear in your ring.” It was obvious to all the exhibitor/handler tables that those at the judges’ table did, indeed show to those two judges that same day.

Similarly, several judges had allegedly invited (impromptu), a group of handlers to their dinner table, again at a public restaurant within the vicinity of the show grounds. Allegedly, it was overheard being said that the handlers declared that they were not showing to the judges the next day. Unfortunately, the handlers accepted the invitation, sat down, enjoyed their dinner (allegedly) and then to the horror of the

diners/exhibitors at the other tables (yes, you know it’s coming), proceeded to show to those same judges the very next day! I wonder how they did? Who cares? The perception of impropriety was already in the negative. And to add salt to the wound, not one of those judges chose the high road and excused the handlers from their ring.

To quote the Rules, Policies and Guidelines Judges Book, under the“Conflict of Interest” section, “A conflict of interest exists when a judge is influenced by any relationship or factor other than the merit of the dogs.” Surely the other exhibitors who witnessed the prior night’s dinner are questioning these judges’ decisions.

In conclusion, be aware of the Rules and Policies. Be aware of the possibility of perceived or obvious improprieties. And, be aware that the exhibitors and handlers that attend the shows and therefore possibly the restaurants in between the shows are quite savvy and are very knowledgeable in the various Rules and Regulations that govern AKC dogs shows. They do know that the three scenarios were wrong and they do hold you accountable for your actions.

– Patricia Proctor AKC Executive Field Representative

Improprieties and Perceptions!

A Letter from an Exhibitor

Dear Judges,

I’m not a letter writer but after years of showing I need to get this off my chest.

When we exhibitors come into your ring, we deserve to be treated with the same

respect you are given. A smile would be nice – maybe even a good morning.

Yes, I know there are some of us that are not courteous but there are way more

judges that treat us like cattle. If it were not for the exhibitor, you would not have

anything to judge!

When you are rude, short and even nasty, it sends a very bad message. When

you dismiss a dog because you don’t like its color or tell some one on the table

”sometimes you win – sometimes you lose,” is just plain wrong and rude!

What gives you that right? You are judging a dog – you are not a god!

I am wondering if your attitude has anything to do with the decline in show entrees?

If you want our respect please start showing us some – and if you hate judging so

much STAY HOME !

– An exhibitor that is fed up with rude Judges — Try practicing a SMILE!!!!

THE STANDARD 13

AKC Advanced Working InstituteThe AKC Advanced Working Institute held in Cleveland, Ohio December 16 – 19, 2010 was a huge success thanks to our Parent Clubs who graciously provided the presenters for each of the Working Dog Breeds. It was a fun and educational event for everyone, and the weather cooperated too!

THE STANDARD14

Mr. William J. Bailey (NC)

Mr. Peter Bauer (WI)

Mr. Richard L. Bauer (FL)

Mrs. Mona S. Kucker Berkowitz (CA)

Mr. Rufus C. Burleson (TX)

Mr. Robert Condon (FL)

Mr. Robert E. Clyde (MD)

Mr. B. Nolan Dale (PA)

Mrs. Marilyn Gitelson (NV)

Mrs. Marieann Gladstone (PA)

Dr. Robert L. Gossweiler (PA)

Mrs. Lorraine M. Groshans (NC)

Mr. D. Roy Holloway (PA)

Mrs. Dorothy O. Hutchinson (CT)

Mrs. Midge L. Hylton (CA)

Mrs. Patricia Ide (CA)

Gilbert S. Kahn (RI)

Mr. Dennis J. Kniola (OH)

Dr. Charles C. Kruger (WA)

Mr. Jack C. Kuster (NC)

Mr. Phillip A. Lanard III (FL)

Mr. James A. Lester (NJ)

Dr. Gerald M. Mager (MA)

Mr. Robert A. Marshall (CA)

Mr. Forrest W. McCoy (FL)

Mrs. Fran T. McNamee (GA)

Mr. Thomas L. McPheron (FL)

Mr. Joseph Mecera (OH)

Mr. Norton Moore (TX)

Mr. Richard S. Orseno (IL)

Mr. George V. Rood (OH)

Mr. Martin H. Runge (WI)

Lt. Col. Charles W. Ruppert (FL)

Mrs. Jean L. Sheehy (NC)

Mrs. Nancy B. Shelton (MO)

Mr. Merlin J. Van de Kinder (CAN)

Mrs. Margaret VanHook Swayze (KY)

Mr. Robert M. VanWinkle (NH)

Mr. Richard F. Whalen (CA)

Mr. Darol L. White (CA)

We give dogs time we can spare, space we can spare and love we can spare. And in return, dogs give us their all. It’s the best deal man has ever made. – M. Acklam

You can say any foolish thing to a dog and the dog will give you a look that says, ‘My God, you’re right! I never would’ve thought of that!’ – Dave Barry

If you think dogs can’t count, try putting three dog biscuits in your pocket and then giving Binky only two of them. – Phil Pastoret

In MemoriamGone from our sight, but never our memories.

Gone from our touch, but never our hearts.The friends we lost in 2010

S S

S S

THE STANDARD 15

       A

ll  W

eath

er  Ja

cket

           

           

           

           

           

           

           

           

           

           

           

           

           

           

           

           

           

           

           

           

           

           

   Buc

ket  

Hat

           M

icro

 line

 fabr

ic  w

ith  zip

pere

d  po

cket

s,      

           

           

           

           

           

           

           

           

           

           

           

           

           

           

           

           

           

           

     Kh

aki  w

ith  N

avy  em

broi

dere

d  AKC

 logo

             n

avy  w

ith  ta

n  trim

 and

 mat

chin

g  em

broi

dere

d  lo

go                                                                                                                                                                                          10

0%  C

otto

n.  O

ne  size  

fits  al

l.                                      

         A

vaila

ble  

in  sizes

 S,  M

,  L,  X

L,  2

XL                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              $

20.0

0  S&

H  includ

ed  

         $

85.0

0  S&

H  includ

ed  

       

                   

                                                                                               

           

           

           

           

           

           

           

           

           

     

   

           

       

 “O

ffic

ial”

 AKC

 Judg

es  B

adge

   

   

                             

   

   

   

                                   

Choo

se  fr

om  Silv

er  o

r  Gol

d  to

ne  fi

nish

es  

   

   

               

   

   

                                                                                                                               Ava

ilabl

e  in

 pin

 bac

k,  m

agne

t  bac

k  or

 poc

ket  h

olde

r                                                

   

     

                                                                                                                                                                                                                             (Please  specify  when  ordering

)  $25

.00  S&

H  includ

ed      

           

           

       

       

           

           

           

           

         

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         

           

Ana

tom

y  Re

view

 for  

Dog

 Judg

es                                                                                                                                                            

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           ~

 Cla

udia

 Wal

ler  Orlan

di,  P

hD  

           

           

           

           

           

           

           

           

           

           

           

           

           

           

           

           

           

           

           

           

           

           

           

     “D

esig

ned  

to  b

e  us

ed  a

s  a  

prim

er  fo

r  ne

w  ju

dges

 and

               a  

review

 of  b

asic  can

ine  

anat

omy  fo

r  ex

perien

ced  

judg

es.”    

           

$25.

00  S&H  includ

ed    

           

           

           

           

           

           

           

           

           

           

           

           

           

           

           

           

           

           

           

           

           

           

           

           

           

                                                                                                                                                                                               

     

                       

           

           

           

           

           

           

           

           

           

           

           

           

           

           

           

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     

             

Bree

d  St

anda

rds  

&  B

inde

r          

           

           

           

           

           

           

           

           

           

           

                                                                                                                                                                               

Beau

tiful

 leat

here

tte  

zipp

ered

 bre

ed    

stan

dard

 bin

der  e

mbo

ssed

 with

   AKC

 logo

 ~  in

clud

es  m

onth

ly  p

lann

er                                                                              

                                                                                                                                                                                                       

$55.

00  S&H  includ

ed                                                                                                                                                                                  

                                         

             

     

 All  

Wea

ther

 Jack

et  ($

85)    

   B

ucke

t  H

at  ($

20)    

 Judg

es  B

adge

 ($25

)    

 Ana

tom

y  Re

view

 for  

Dog

 Judg

es  ($

25)    

 Bre

ed  S

tand

ards

 &  B

inde

r  ($

55)    

         

For  

jack

et  p

leas

e  sp

ecify

 siz

e  (S

),  (M

),  (L

),  (X

-­‐L),

 (2XL

)          

           

           

           

           

           

           

     

For  

nam

e  ba

dge  

plea

se  s

peci

fy  t

he  fo

llow

ing:

       

 Gol

d  to

ne        

 Silv

er  fi

nish

   ~    

 Pin

 bac

k      

 Mag

net  b

ack      

 Poc

ket  h

olde

r        

Nam

e  as

 it  s

houl

d  ap

pear

 on  

badg

e:  

 

   

   

   

   

   

   

   

   

   

   

   

   

             

     Pa

ymen

t  M

etho

d:  C

heck

 #__

____

____

or  C

redi

t  Car

d  __

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

 CV

V__

____

____

EXP_

____

__  

Please  allow  4-­‐6  weeks  fo

r  delivery                        

                   (3

 digit  code  on  ba

ck)  

     Se

nd  to

:  Kat

hy  C

arua

na  

 Judg

ing  

Ope

rati

ons    

PO  B

ox  9

0006

2    

Rale

igh,

 NC  

2767

5-­‐90

62;  9

198

163

862;

 kac

1@ak

c.or

g;  fa

x:  9

198

164

225  

Nam

e __

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

_ A

ddre

ss__

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

___

City

, Sta

te Z

ip__

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

__

Tele

phon

e #_

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

___J

udge

s #

____

____

_

Order  a  Jacket  

and  get  a  

FREE  Badge!  

(a  $25.00  value,  FREE!)  

T

HE

Jud

ge

s st

or

e

John

Sm

ithA

KC

Jud

ge

SENIOR EDITOR

John Wade

EDITORS

Ines MaldonadoTim Thomas

CONTRIBUTORS

John WadeTim ThomasInes MaldonadoPatricia ProctorSue VroomAllen OdomTom GlassfordLee WhittierAnne KatonaMildred K. BryantJennifer ClarkBobby Birdsong

PRODUCTION EDITOR

Kathy Caruana

DESIGNER

Monica Tate

PUBLISHED BY

The American Kennel Club for Approved Conformation and Junior Showmanship Judges

The AKC Institute for Aspiring and Newly Approved Judges

Kentucky Fair & Exposition Center – Louisville, KYIn conjunction with the Kentuckiana Cluster of Dog Shows

March 19, 2011

Harrah’s Rincon Casino and Resort – Valley Center, CAIn conjunction with the Mt. Palomar Kennel Club Show

May 21, 2011

Clark Country Fairgrounds – Ridgefield, WAIn conjunction with the Vancouver Kennel Club Show

October 29, 2011

The Trade Center at the Courtyard by Marriott – Fitchburg, MAIn conjunction with the Framingham District Kennel Club Dog Shows

November 12, 2011

AKC/DJAA Advanced Herding Dog InstituteIn conjunction with the World Series of Dog Shows

Houston, Texas • 4-Day Seminar • July 21-24, 2011

AKC Advanced Hound InstituteIn conjunction with the Keystone Cluster Show

Harrisburg, Pennsylvania • 4-Day Seminar • August 11-14, 2011

AKC Advanced Toy Group & Featured Miscellaneous Breeds Institute

In conjunction with the AKC/Eukanuba National ChampionshipOrlando, Florida • 4-Day Seminar • December 15-18, 2011

ADVANCED INSTITUTES

For additional information including registration, contactKathy Caruana at kac1@akc.org or (919) 816-3862.

Please note: As of January 2011, seminar listings will no longer appear in the AKC Gazette. Seminar announcements will however, continue

to be available on our website.

To view the complete listing of seminars and to download registration forms, click here.