jpkenny subsea system model that worked 240310

8/2/2019 JPKenny Subsea System Model That Worked 240310

1/19

A Model That Worked

Brian TaylorSnr Subsea Systems Engineer, J P Kenny


2/19

What is a System?

Definition

An (assembly or) combination of interrelated elements (orparts) working together toward a common objective.

rgo, ystem ng neer ng s

The (design and) implementation of (production) systems

that require the integration of diverse and complex tasks.


3/19

Project Drivers

Project

Development

System

Engineering

Process

Development

Phasing

Life Cycle

TheSystem

Design Basis

Team

Life CycleIntegration


4/19

System Definition

DesignIntent

System Drivers

Flow Assurance

Materials

DesignPhilosophies

Detailed Design

ontro Construction/Installation

Commissioning

Operations

IMR

Inspection

Maintenance

Repair


5/19


6/19

System Engineering Management

O erations &

The Traditional Approach

Requirements

Analysis

Concept

System Design

FEED

qu pmen

Engineering

Detail Design

es

Integration

Manufacture /Test &

Integration

ns a a on

Commissioning

Commissioning& Operation

Time


7/19

Breaking with Tradition...

RISER

QUICK CO NNECT /DISCONNECTTURRETSOFEC

INSTALL ATION ACTIVITIESCS O

SHUTTLE TANKERPETRO-CANADA

OFFL OADING

SBR /PCL

125,000bopd PROCESSSBR /PCL

SWIVELSOFEC STEEL VESSEL

SBR /SHIPYARD

TRANSOCE ANE XPLORERDRILL RIG

TERRA NOVA

RESE RVOIR E NGINEE RINGPC /HES

DOWN HOL E-WORKHES

XMAS TREE SF MC

'HOST'TE MPL ATE /MANIFOL DKOS

OPEN 'GL ORY HOLE 'CS O

MOORINGSSOFEC

PIL E D ANCHORS

FLEXIBLE FLOWLINESCS O

PC - PE TRO-CANADA

C SO - COFL EX IP STE NA OFFSHORE

SB R - SHAWMONT BROWN & ROOT

H E S - HAL L IBURTON ENER GY SE RVIC ES

PC L - P C L C O N ST R UC T O R S

F MC - FMC (SOFE C, K OS)

DC - DORIS CONPRO


8/19

The Jordan Wheel

Subsystems

Equipment Vendor Engineer

Lead Engineers:

Materials Controls

Commissioning Operations Communications Flow Assurance

Interface Engineers

Technical Integrity Group


9/19

What is the TIG?


10/19

Questions......


11/19

Workshop

Its discussion time........

We will spend the next 30 mins or so split into 2 groups

Grou 1 Grou 2

Suggested key words:- Responsibilities

Ownership

Deliverables (e.g. P&ID,

Philosophies, Design Basis etc) Input & Influence [on project

processes]

Gate / Peer Reviews

Suggested key words:- Integrated Team

System Manager

Current project s [examples of

use] Opportunity [to adopt as

industry approach]

Scaled [down for a smallproject]


12/19

Conclusions

We will record any outcomes from today's workshop

and present them to the SUT for their use

Thank you for your time and participation


13/19

Society for Underwater

Technology

13

Output fromWorkshop


14/19

Group 1

Frame how the systems engineers responsibilities progress through the projectlifecycle.

PHASE 1:

Definition of project design basis.

Engineering concept definition / functionality.

Take reservoir characteristics and provide to FA engineer FA design basis.

14

System manager frames the opportunity.

Develop a high level concept to prove commerciality of project.

Feed into overall value of project (NPV, R01, etc).


15/19

Group 1

PHASE 2:

Generate alternative layouts for subsea architecture.

Enhance project design basis, philosophies, P&IDs and strategies. Develop Subsea design and Pipeline design.

Constraints on project contracting strategy, scheduling drivers andgovernment issues etc.

ec n ca qua ca on program.

Screen options, both internally and externally. Select preferred option andprovide recommendation.

Conduct Pre-FEED surveys.

Define technical specifications that need to be developed in Phase 3(FEED ITT package).

System engineer ensures integrity of design.

15


16/19

Group 1

PHASE 3:

FEED

Driver to attain scope definition. Develop a schedule.

Integration of all disciplines:

Functional engineer.

O erations.

Flow assurance. Precommission / IMR.

Project Execution Plan Role &Responsibilities.

Prequals verification and assurance program.

ITT procurement packages.

Subsea Equipment Vendors, Umbilical Vendors, etc. Long Lead Items based on schedule constraints.

Class III established.

Final Investment Decision [FID].

16


17/19

Group 1

PHASE 4:

Execution.

Award and manage packages. Interface management.

Ensure project support is in place and processes are clearly defined.

System verification activities:

Design reviews.

Monitoring and assessing Fit for Purpose

SIT

Constructability and installability.

17


18/19

Group 2

Current Projects and how the system is managed:

Pluto

Systems manager Process and FA

Materials / integrity

Operations

Commissioning

I/F management

Gorgon

Engineering management

Standard guidelines

WEL SSF Integrity Team (TIAs) Centralise TIAs by project at the project base

Integrated team.

18


19/19

Group 3

Does the TIG work?

There appear to be lots of chiefs is this extra responsibility over there normaldiscipline role?

There has to be a facilitator for the TIG. But with what level of responsibility?

The process needs to be well defined before project kick-off

Lessons learnt from various projects (see group 2) should be compiled to see if it

Pros of TIG type & of Traditional type Cons of TIG type & of Traditional type

Communication is key to the TIG

Project management systems must be coordinated across the differentdisciplines/contracts

Interfaces have to be filtered, meaningful and given prioritised accordingly

Empowerment people in the TIG must be given the authority to make a decisionand follow it through

Scaling does not appear to be an issue and the TIG would seem lend itselfparticularly well to projects with smaller client team

19

jpkenny subsea system model that worked 240310

Documents