journals performance review
DESCRIPTION
Journals Performance Review. Publications Committee Meeting 6 January 2010. Points of Review. Revenue Key Indicator Update Financials Expense Key Indicator Update Direct and Indirect Expenses Net Margin Looking Forward. Key Indicators: Institutional Subscribers. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Journals Performance Review](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022070405/5681401e550346895dab7481/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Journals Performance Review
Publications Committee Meeting6 January 2010
![Page 2: Journals Performance Review](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022070405/5681401e550346895dab7481/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
Points of Review
• Revenue Key Indicator Update Financials
• Expense Key Indicator Update Direct and Indirect Expenses Net Margin
• Looking Forward
![Page 3: Journals Performance Review](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022070405/5681401e550346895dab7481/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
Key Indicators: Institutional Subscribers
• Institutional subscribers experienced a 5% decrease in FY09.
* Data based on September results.
![Page 4: Journals Performance Review](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022070405/5681401e550346895dab7481/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
Subscription Rates: Institutions
• Since FY07, subscription rates have increased 5-6% each year.
• FY10 Rates:
AIAAJ: $1,640 JA: $900 JGCD: $915 JPP: $990
JSR: $850 JTHT: $720 JACIC: $380
![Page 5: Journals Performance Review](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022070405/5681401e550346895dab7481/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Institutional Subscriber Mix by Revenue Source
5
• Since FY08, the majority of Institutional subscriber revenue has been generated from customers that prefer some or all content delivered in an online format.
![Page 6: Journals Performance Review](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022070405/5681401e550346895dab7481/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
Key Indicators: Member Subscriptions
• After declining the last two years, the number of member subscriptions increased slightly in FY09.
![Page 7: Journals Performance Review](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022070405/5681401e550346895dab7481/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
Subscription Rates: Members
• Subscription rates for members remained at the same levels in FY10.
![Page 8: Journals Performance Review](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022070405/5681401e550346895dab7481/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
Key Indicators: Geographic Breakdown
• In FY09, domestic subscribers accounted for 65% of total subscriptions.
• The percentage of non U.S. subscribers has gradually increased over the past five years.
* Data includes Member and Institutional Subscribers
![Page 9: Journals Performance Review](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022070405/5681401e550346895dab7481/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
Revenue Trends
• Although Journal revenue declined 3% in FY09, Journals revenue has grown 11% since FY05.
• All products experienced a slight decrease in revenue, with the exception of the Journal of Propulsion and Power, which remained flat.
![Page 10: Journals Performance Review](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022070405/5681401e550346895dab7481/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Revenue by Source
10
• Institutions generated 82% of all Journals revenue.• “Other” sales include online transactional sales of Journal articles and reprint sales.
![Page 11: Journals Performance Review](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022070405/5681401e550346895dab7481/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
Key Indicators: Manuscripts Accepted
• The overall number of manuscripts accepted declined 4% in FY09.
• While domestic manuscripts accepted remained flat in FY09, the number of
non U.S. manuscripts accepted declined by 7% in FY09.
![Page 12: Journals Performance Review](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022070405/5681401e550346895dab7481/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
Key Indicators: Pages Published
• In FY09, the total pages published for Journals increased 2%.
• All Journals remained flat or experienced an increase, with the exception of the AIAA Journal, which experienced a 7% decline in number of pages published. .
![Page 13: Journals Performance Review](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022070405/5681401e550346895dab7481/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
Direct Expenses
• Direct expenses include costs for paper, printing, outside production, postage, honoraria, and color printing offset.
• After experiencing two years of shrinking expenses due to lower production costs and higher collections for color printing, direct costs increased 6%, or $54K, in FY09.
• Increases in expenses in FY09 were due primarily to an increase in Honoraria ($27K), paper ($14K) and print production ($13K).
![Page 14: Journals Performance Review](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022070405/5681401e550346895dab7481/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Direct Expense Breakdown
14
• Although printing costs run about 18% of total costs, they are offset by color printing collections.•“Other” costs include committee expenses, consulting fees, office supplies, software, travel, and temporary staff support (designers).
![Page 15: Journals Performance Review](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022070405/5681401e550346895dab7481/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Direct Operating Margin
15
• Direct Operating Margin = Revenue less Direct Expenses• Journals direct margin declined 6% in FY09 due to slight revenue decrease and an increase in direct expenses.
![Page 16: Journals Performance Review](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022070405/5681401e550346895dab7481/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
Indirect Expenses Breakdown
• Indirect expenses include salaries, benefits, general and administrative costs and shared services allocations.
• The comparison of indirect expenses is not consistent year to year due to modifications in financial reporting practices to allocate all indirect costs to all projects.
• Publications Process is an expense account that falls under VP Publications and is then allocated to Books and Journals.
• In FY09, Publications Process consisted of $31K in direct costs that covered staff travel ($13K), committee expenses ($15K) and miscellaneous expenses like postage, society dues, and professional subscriptions. The remaining expenses included Labor & Benefits ($358K), and allocations ($462K).
![Page 17: Journals Performance Review](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022070405/5681401e550346895dab7481/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
17
Putting It All Together…Net Margin
• Journals net margin has declined primarily due to a change in allocation methodology and an increase in indirect costs such as medical and fringe benefits, although direct margin did decline in FY09.
![Page 18: Journals Performance Review](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022070405/5681401e550346895dab7481/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
18
Looking Forward
• Continue to incentivize institutional customers to subscribe to the “complete” collection without requiring a bundled purchase.
• Explore flexible subscription options for non-traditional or developing markets
• Concerted focus on international library consortia• Continue emphasize archives• Monitor the print-online tipping point and timing• Appropriate expense discipline• Proactively plan for public/open access models for federally
funded research content
![Page 19: Journals Performance Review](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022070405/5681401e550346895dab7481/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
19