jon jensen, kent bolton, dick simons...powerpoint presentation author: duncan, camille created date:...
TRANSCRIPT
Changes in system
inertia with high
renewable
implementation
1/15/2020
Jon Jensen, Kent
Bolton, Dick Simons
▪ This study was performed through the
System Inertia Task Force (SITF). A group of
stakeholders and subject matter experts.
2
SITF
▪ Assess impact on reliability of Bulk Electric System (BES) in the Western Interconnection (WI) as inertia decreases from retirement of coal resources and addition of Inverter Based Resources (IBR) by assessing the following:
• Frequency response
• Reliability impact
• Transient voltage stability
• Impact of IBR with/without frequency response capability
• Crucial contingency changes
• Transmission path loading change
• Short circuit fault duty
• Resource adequacy
• Capital cost of added IBR
3
Purpose
▪ 2028 Anchor Data Set (ADS) Phase 2 V2.0
▪ Retire 100% of coal resources
▪ Add Wind/Solar/Battery to replace coal
resources
▪ Select hours of PCM to study in PowerFlow
▪ Dynamic and contingency analysis
▪ Capital cost
▪ Fault current analysis
4
Assessment Approach
▪ Alberta
5
Resource conversions
Unit Name Capacity, MW
Sheerness_2_2 408
Sheerness1-1 408
Genesee_2_2 422
Genesee1-1 422
Genesee_3_3 527
Keephills3_1 498
Total: 2,685
6
Resource retirements
Total of 18,976 MW coal retirements, 21,661 MW including Alberta resource conversions
15
Inertia
• SITF case has about 62% of the Inertia as the Phase 1 case.• Note MVA on plot does not include IBR MVA, synchronous only.
16
Inertia
• We see decreased inertia where coal was removed
• Other differences due to dispatch/load differences between cases
▪ Levelized Cost of Energy (LCOE) represents the energy price
output needed to recuperate the cost of the plant over its
estimated lifetime. CCGT has an LCOE of about $48/MWh
20
LCOE-Energy Price $/MWh
▪ Plot shows decreasing
fault current only
▪ IBR vs Synch machine
fault current
▪ Difference in 28HS1 vs
SITF (Dispatch difference)
▪ Reliability concerns
▪ Geographic information
system (GIS) data for
about half of the busses
21
Fault Current
The Standard Disturbances include:
▪ Chief Joe Brake insertion
• Insertion for 30 cycles and then removal of the large braking resistor in the Northwest
▪ Double Palo Verde Outage
• Simultaneous tripping of two Palo Verde generation units
▪ Colorado River Red Bluff Outage
• 3 phase fault with tripping of two transmission lines in Southern California
▪ Gates – Midway and Diablo-Midway Outage
• 3 phase fault with tripping of three transmission lines in Northern California
▪ Brownlee – Hells Canyon Outage
• 3 phase fault with tripping of one large transmission line in Idaho. This includes the approximation of an associated Remedial Action Scheme (RAS).
▪ Daniel Park – Comanche Outage
• 3 phase fault and then tripping of two large transmission lines in Colorado
▪ Pacific DC Intertie (PDCI) Block
• Simulates a block (removal of the lines from service) of the DC line from Celilo (in the Northwest) to Sylmar (in Southern California)
22
Dynamics
Dynamics double PV outage (units 1 & 2)
23
f nadir f delt response RoCoF
ADS 59.86461 0.136112 2018.335 -0.027
SITF 59.77664 0.223797 1168.739 -0.13564
F nadir is in Hz, fdelt is in Hz, f response is in MW/.1 Hz and RoCoF is in Hz/s.
▪ Six times as much IBR generation capacity
needed to replace the coal capacity due to
capacity factor differences.
▪ …
24
Observations
▪ Updating all Short Circuit Model busses with GIS data to more fully represent system on map plot;
▪ Completing additional Short Circuit analysis in CAPE/Aspen where one case has all coal removed and the other one includes coal to include Zero and Negative sequence;
▪ Completing autumn Power Flow and dynamics analyses;
▪ Studying dynamics where frequency response and voltage regulation capability is turned on for all IBR;
▪ Evaluating differences in Path flow loading and run contingencies on related loaded paths;
▪ Analyzing in greater depth the impact on reliability from the addition of energy storage (Batteries/CAES);
▪ Evaluating possible mitigation techniques for path overloads; and
▪ Optimizing the system for the best mix of energy storage and renewables.
25
Recommendations