joint priority project #2: service visions and mapping
DESCRIPTION
DRAFT. Joint Priority Project #2: Service Visions and Mapping. Presentation to PSSDC/PSCIOC Winnipeg, Manitoba, September 28, 2004 By: Industry Canada Ontario Ministry of Consumer and Business Services. Background – What is BTEP?. Business Transformation Enablement Program (BTEP) - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Joint Priority Project #2:Service Visions and Mapping
Presentation to PSSDC/PSCIOCWinnipeg, Manitoba, September 28, 2004By: Industry Canada Ontario Ministry of Consumer and Business Services
DRAFT
DRAFT
Background – What is BTEP?
Business Transformation Enablement Program (BTEP) Business process analysis tool for studying service from the
client perspective Designed to facilitate client-focused service transformation
Seamless access to services across departments, jurisdictions Identify opportunities for bundling, alignment, streamlining and
harmonization Integration focus -- common and shared services
Why use BTEP? Common language: Defines services and provides an
awareness of service delivery from a client perspective Provides the Big Picture: Method for understanding how
services across departments and jurisdictions impact clients Guides operations and policy decisions: Identifies service
overlaps and redundancies within and across jurisdictions Service Transformation: Supports bundling of services and
potential joint delivery of service
DRAFT
Benefits of BTEP
Client Focus Deconstructs service based on the experience of the client
Objectivity Focus on client helps to objectively identify service
overlaps and opportunities for streamlining and harmonization
An objective assessment of government’s impact on clients
Policy Analysis Understanding service overlaps helps to better understand
the policy context for service. Examples:
Regulation (permits and licenses) Social Benefits (seniors)
DRAFT
Background: How does BTEP work?
Four basic tools Government Strategic Reference Model (GSRM)
A shared language for describing service Fields for service deliverers and service receivers 19 generic terms for types of client outputs (interventions, periods of
permission, findings, etc.) Public Sector Business Model (PSBM)
Puts GSRM in context of governance and performance measurement Transformation Framework
Scopes the “as is” and “to be” views of service delivery Helps define the service architecture and provides the map for change
Vision, Opportunities, Business Cases Service visions build on the previous three tools to define the end-state
for service transformation and fuel the identification of opportunities and the development of business cases.
If a picture is worth a thousand words, then a business model is worth a thousand pictures. TBS BTEP Synopsis, 2004
DRAFT
Example: Halton Project
Application of BTEP to starting a restaurant in Halton
Goals Test the BTEP methodology and report on success Lay a foundation for further mapping Identify possible opportunities for horizontal
collaboration Involved federal, provincial, and municipal
representatives Mapped all of the government services that could be
required to start a restaurant in Halton
DRAFT
Halton Project Commitment
Workshops / Time Investment
Workshop 1 = 2.5 days, Oct 21-23, 2003 Purpose: scope work and develop ‘as
is’ model of services (in Ottawa) Workshop 2 = 2 days, Dec 9 &10, 2003
Purpose: alignment exercise leading to catalytic opportunity identification (in Halton)
Workshop 3 = 2 days, Jan. 13 & 14, 2004 Purpose: scope catalytic opportunities;
develop ‘to be’ models and strategy statement (in Toronto)
Considerable investment of time and expert knowledge, involving key staff from all three levels of government
Mapping process is labour intensive – requires up-front commitment and shared goals Information on implementing BTEP is limited, but high degree of expertise is required
DRAFT
Halton Project – Results The BTEP process identified:
Areas of overlap among jurisdictions or service areas Common service outputs by jurisdiction and type
Alignment opportunities included: Alignment of information services at key points Alignment of service delivery in key areas Common client information, registration Common compliance and monitoring
Pros Very powerful suite of tools and procedures Participants found that the BTEP process made sense BTEP brings together disparate programs and services and considers them in a
standardized way Cons
Highly complex process Limited support and resources for applying the methodology Difficult to document and standardize the communication of process outcomes
because of the diversity of tools required.
DRAFT
Ongoing Projects - BizPaL
BizPaL Permits and Licenses Project Has been developed based on service
mapping Has used the BTEP methodology in six
jurisdictions to map permit and license services
Mapping by industry sector – client focus Mapping according to consistent definitions –
industry classification codes Mapping according to common
understandings – shared definitions of service activities
BizPaL will use BTEP in development and the ongoing engagement of new partners
An experiment in BTEP Opportunity to continue advising Joint
Councils of successes in implementation
Bed and Breakfast Permits and LicensesBusiness/Service Process Points
DRAFT
When is BTEP most useful?
Focused assessment of a perceived opportunity Review service delivery in an area where departments or
jurisdictions feel that they can bundle or streamline
Focused assessment of the service outputs to a client segment
Review of client service outputs and delivery systems to a specific client segment (ie: start-up businesses, seniors)
Focused assessment of a shared function Review of client outputs and service delivery in a specific
area of servcie (ie: permits, incorporation, transport)
DRAFT
What environmental factors are needed?
An understanding of the implications and a commitment to the outcomes
Support from champions
Support from a policy agenda and acceptance of policy implications or an operational imperative
Possibility for consensus on change among stakeholders
DRAFT
What could help in the future?
Access to BTEP expertise and knowledge
A common set of tools, including reporting tools
Consensus on such issues as the depth of application required to identify opportunities
A clearinghouse of BTEP information and analyses
DRAFT
Possible Next Steps
Form a working group or sub-committee tasked with exploring shared needs for BTEP resources
Develop a 12 month work plan Identify goals Identify and assemble resources/assets Identify needs Prepare a proposal for implementation for approval
and resource allocation