john r. baldwin, ph.d. school of communication illinois state university [email protected] november...

26
John R. Baldwin, Ph.D. School of Communication Illinois State University [email protected] November 9, 2005

Upload: grace-boyd

Post on 27-Dec-2015

220 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: John R. Baldwin, Ph.D. School of Communication Illinois State University jrbaldw@ilstu.edu November 9, 2005

John R. Baldwin, Ph.D.School of Communication

Illinois State [email protected]

November 9, 2005

Page 2: John R. Baldwin, Ph.D. School of Communication Illinois State University jrbaldw@ilstu.edu November 9, 2005

So….What do we mean by “difference”?

Overlapping bell curves Diversity among

difference Changing (co-)cultures Race & Gender: Who is

“more different”? The haunting question:

Are differences between groups greater than the differences within groups?

Page 3: John R. Baldwin, Ph.D. School of Communication Illinois State University jrbaldw@ilstu.edu November 9, 2005

Top Challenges for Women & Men (Barbara Annis & Associates)

Challenges for Women

Challenges for Men

•Dismissed because of communication style•Ignored, interrupted•Tested•Third Sex (identity)•Excluded, avoided•Tokens

•Confused•Careful (eggshells!)•“Reverse Discrimination”•Difficult supporting women•Communication

(http://baainc.com/baarticle1.htm)

Page 4: John R. Baldwin, Ph.D. School of Communication Illinois State University jrbaldw@ilstu.edu November 9, 2005

Deborah Tannen’s Approach

Women

Rapport

Collaboration

Men

• Report

• Competition

Page 5: John R. Baldwin, Ph.D. School of Communication Illinois State University jrbaldw@ilstu.edu November 9, 2005

Deborah Tannen (cont’d)Women Men

• Interruptions

• Telling stories

• Nonverbal feedback (mm hmm)

• Posture & NV communication

Page 6: John R. Baldwin, Ph.D. School of Communication Illinois State University jrbaldw@ilstu.edu November 9, 2005

Another way to see the same thing

http://www.genderwork.com/services/organizationaldev.html

Page 7: John R. Baldwin, Ph.D. School of Communication Illinois State University jrbaldw@ilstu.edu November 9, 2005

Gender Linked Language Effect

Page 8: John R. Baldwin, Ph.D. School of Communication Illinois State University jrbaldw@ilstu.edu November 9, 2005

Male Leadership—Female Leadership

[Natalle, 1996]

Competitive Organizes

hierarchically Transactional Objective: to win High control Reason & analysis Low emotional

involvement “Sports team” models Command/control

leader

Bottom line: cooperation

Organizes in teams Interactive Objective: quality

output Shared control High performance

standards Empathy & Support Collaborative

interaction Democratic

See also: http://www.womentodaymagazine.com/career/differences.html

Page 9: John R. Baldwin, Ph.D. School of Communication Illinois State University jrbaldw@ilstu.edu November 9, 2005

When Women and Men Communicate

Women Men•Forced to choose “womb” or “brain”—can’t use both•If feminine, incompetent; if competent, not feminine•As men age, they gain wisdom & power; as women age, they gain wrinkles & irrelevance

•Men can’t show emotions & be masculine at the same time•Men aren’t allowed to play “traditional” career roles & be seen as successful•Men who support women’s advances are not “masculine.” Those who don’t are “chauvinist”

Double Binds

Page 10: John R. Baldwin, Ph.D. School of Communication Illinois State University jrbaldw@ilstu.edu November 9, 2005

Changing Gender Generalizations

The changing womanFeminism

○ Liberal○ Radical

Women in sportsWomen reclaiming

identity

The changing manMetrosexualsUbersexualshttp://seattletimes.nwsource.com/cgi-bin/PrintStory.pl?

document_id=2001999488&zsection_id=268448455&slug=kleiman08&date=20040808; http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/businesstechnology/2001999488_kleiman08.html; http://www.philly.com/mld/dailynews/12879530.htm

Page 11: John R. Baldwin, Ph.D. School of Communication Illinois State University jrbaldw@ilstu.edu November 9, 2005

Stereotypes of Women (Wood, 1999)

Stereotyping is the “major reason behind the gender gap in leadership”

--Ilene H. Lang, President, Catalyst

www.aribella.com/genderbias.htm, in Washingtonpost.com (10/30/05)

[See also http://www.intekworld.com/Newsletters/February2002/gender_comm.htm ]

Sex object:Pleasing appearance

Mother“not serious

professionals” Iron Maiden Child

Page 12: John R. Baldwin, Ph.D. School of Communication Illinois State University jrbaldw@ilstu.edu November 9, 2005

Stereotypes of Men (Wood,

1999)

Who stereotypes women in the workplace?

“In other words, men run the organization and women support them. That just the way most of us think, right?...But why, after all this time. . . Are we still putting women in their stereotypical places?”

--Amy Joyce, Washingtonpost.com, 10/30/05

Sturdy Oak:Self-containedNot weak or reliant

FighterNo room for “wimpy”

commitmentAggressiveConflicting

BreadwinnerSuccess objects

Page 13: John R. Baldwin, Ph.D. School of Communication Illinois State University jrbaldw@ilstu.edu November 9, 2005

Communication and Power…

Separation Accommodation Assimilation

Nonassertive •Avoiding•Maintaining interpersonal barriers

•Increasing visibility•Dispelling stereotypes

•Emphasizing commonalities•Averting controversy

Assertive •Intragroup networking•Exemplifying strengths

•Using liaisons•Educating others

•Extensive preparation•Overcompensating

Aggressive •Attacking•Sabotaging

•Confronting•Gaining advantage

•Mirroring•Strategic Distancing

From M. P. Orbe, M. P. (1998) Constructing co-cultural theory: An explication of culture, power, and communication. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Page 14: John R. Baldwin, Ph.D. School of Communication Illinois State University jrbaldw@ilstu.edu November 9, 2005

What is a “Co-Culture”?

A group that has little or no say in creating the dominant structure of society

E.G. Ethnic or religious minorities, homosexuals, the disabled, etc…

Page 15: John R. Baldwin, Ph.D. School of Communication Illinois State University jrbaldw@ilstu.edu November 9, 2005

Why learn about co-cultural communication?

“Identification and explication of the communication practices of co-cultural groups are valuable and important for understanding how persons, marginalized in a dominant society, communicate with those who have direct access to institutional power.”

FOR MORE INFO...

--Orbe, 1998 (p. 86)

Page 16: John R. Baldwin, Ph.D. School of Communication Illinois State University jrbaldw@ilstu.edu November 9, 2005

Background to CCT

Standpoint (feminist) theoryEach group has partial knowledgeSome partial knowledges are more

complete than others: Subordinate group knows dominant more than dominant knows subordinate (why?)

It is important to learn perspectives of subordinate groups (why?)

Page 17: John R. Baldwin, Ph.D. School of Communication Illinois State University jrbaldw@ilstu.edu November 9, 2005

Background to CCT Muted Group (feminist) theory

Dominant group shapes the language of a society

Co-cultures must create their own language to make sense of their reality

Yet, dominant culture privileges one speech code (dominant) over the other (co-cultural), often through ridicule, marginalization, and (perhaps unintentional) dominance in modes of language creation and propagation

Page 18: John R. Baldwin, Ph.D. School of Communication Illinois State University jrbaldw@ilstu.edu November 9, 2005

Six Universal Influences1. Preferred Outcomes—“What

communication behavior will lead to the effect that I desire?”

2. Field of Experience– “What past interactions have I had with dominant group members that will influence my current behavior?

3. Abilities– “What are my physical and psychological limitations in communicating with the dominant culture?”

Continued…

Page 19: John R. Baldwin, Ph.D. School of Communication Illinois State University jrbaldw@ilstu.edu November 9, 2005

4. Situational Context– “In what situation am I communicating with the dominant culture?”

5. Perceived Costs and Rewards— “What do I stand to gain and lose from an interaction with a member of the dominant culture?”

6. Communication Approach– “Which of the three approaches will I employ to achieve my preferred outcome?”

Page 20: John R. Baldwin, Ph.D. School of Communication Illinois State University jrbaldw@ilstu.edu November 9, 2005

1. Assimilation – trying to get rid of all cultural differences in an attempt of fit into the dominant culture.

2. Accommodation – insisting that the dominant culture reinvent or change the rules of society so it can incorporate the life experiences of each co-culture group.

3. Separation – rejecting the notion of forming a common bond with dominant group and seeking to maintain separate group identities outside the dominant structure.

Page 21: John R. Baldwin, Ph.D. School of Communication Illinois State University jrbaldw@ilstu.edu November 9, 2005

1. Nonassertive – behaviors in which individuals are seemingly inhibited and non-confrontational; putting the needs of others before one’s own.

2. Assertive – communication practices that encompass self-enhancing expressive behavior that takes into account the needs of others and one’s self.

3. Aggressive – communication practices that can be perceived as hurtfully expressive and self-promoting. Aggressive practices assume control over the choices of others.

Page 22: John R. Baldwin, Ph.D. School of Communication Illinois State University jrbaldw@ilstu.edu November 9, 2005

Female Managers with Male Employees

1. Don’t take it personally if some men don’t particularly like working with or for a female. (It’s just a job; you don’t have to be liked).

2. Be direct, concise, and to the point in conversation. Don’t assume he will pick up subtle cues or ask for information.

3. Don’t offer help apologetically. Just give suggestions directly.

4. Lighten up a little. (you can have a sense of humor and gain credibility also).

--Judith Tingley: Suggestions for Genderflexing

Page 23: John R. Baldwin, Ph.D. School of Communication Illinois State University jrbaldw@ilstu.edu November 9, 2005

Male Managers with Female Employees1. Listen and talk, rather than tell.2. Treat your female subordinate equally.

(same opportunities to deal with tough tasks, interesting projects, hard or physical work)

3. Recognize the need for difference in how you communicate(e.g., jokes, military or sports metaphors)

4. Give more positive feedback about performance than you think might be necessary in managing men (women may need more approval—on performance, not appearance)

--Judith Tingley: Suggestions for Genderflexing

Page 24: John R. Baldwin, Ph.D. School of Communication Illinois State University jrbaldw@ilstu.edu November 9, 2005

Solutions… “Cultural” differences Describe, don’t evaluate Recognize value differences Be aware of attribution Be aware of stereotypes (yours &

theirs!) Be aware of different meanings Know yourself! Look for similarities (too) Don’t confuse people with cultures Talk through differences

Page 25: John R. Baldwin, Ph.D. School of Communication Illinois State University jrbaldw@ilstu.edu November 9, 2005

Solutions…Prejudice & Stereotypes Be a situational leader Win respect Step out of your comfort zone Led go of the need to be liked Practice leadership and accountability Learn to laugh [Terri Mrosko, www.aribella.com/genderbias.htm]

Is that all there is?

Page 26: John R. Baldwin, Ph.D. School of Communication Illinois State University jrbaldw@ilstu.edu November 9, 2005

Solutions…and Questions

What solutions and strategies have worked for you?

What questions do you have?

To contact speaker: [email protected]