joe wenderoth elliott sidewater · cl pt mugu sea slice nwdc slide (with lm mods) fbe-j...
TRANSCRIPT
173rd MORS
Author Request (To be completed by applicant) - The following author(s) request authority to disclose the following presentation in the MORSS Final Report, for inclusion on the MORSS CD and/or posting on the MORS web site.
Name of Principal Author and all other author(s):
Principal Author’s Organization and address:Phone: (410) 682-1366Fax: (410) 682-1742Email: [email protected]
Original title on 712 A/B: Shipboard Organic UAV Operation
Revised title: Shipboard Organic UAV Operations
Presented in (input and Bold one): (WG10, 11, 13, & 33 CG___, Special Session ___, Poster, Demo, or Tutorial):
This presentation is believed to be:UNCLASSIFIED AND APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
73rd MORSS CD Cover PageUNCLASSIFIED DISCLOSURE FORM CD Presentation
Please complete this form 712CD as your cover page to your electronic briefing submission to the MORSS CD. Do not fax to the MORS office.
21-23 June 2005, at US Military Academy, West Point, NY
712CDFor office use only 41205
Joe Wenderoth
Elliott Sidewater
Joe Wenderoth M/S E2
Lockheed Martin MS2 Baltimore
2323 Eastern Blvd Baltimore, MD 21220-4207
Report Documentation Page Form ApprovedOMB No. 0704-0188
Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering andmaintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information,including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, ArlingtonVA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to a penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if itdoes not display a currently valid OMB control number.
1. REPORT DATE 23 JUN 2005
2. REPORT TYPE N/A
3. DATES COVERED -
4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE Shipboard Organic UAV Operations
5a. CONTRACT NUMBER
5b. GRANT NUMBER
5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER
6. AUTHOR(S) 5d. PROJECT NUMBER
5e. TASK NUMBER
5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER
7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) Lockheed Martin MS2 Baltimore 2323 Eastern Blvd Baltimore, MD 21220-4207
8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATIONREPORT NUMBER
9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR’S ACRONYM(S)
11. SPONSOR/MONITOR’S REPORT NUMBER(S)
12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Approved for public release, distribution unlimited
13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES See also ADM201946, Military Operations Research Society Symposium (73rd) Held in West Point, NY on21-23 June 2005., The original document contains color images.
14. ABSTRACT
15. SUBJECT TERMS
16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT
UU
18. NUMBEROF PAGES
40
19a. NAME OFRESPONSIBLE PERSON
a. REPORT unclassified
b. ABSTRACT unclassified
c. THIS PAGE unclassified
Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8-98) Prescribed by ANSI Std Z39-18
273rd MORS
Shipboard Organic UAV Operations
Presented to Military Operations Research Society Symposium
21-23 June 2005
Joe Wenderoth(410) 682-1366
Balancing Risk for an Uncertain Future
373rd MORS
• Littoral Initiatives in Fleet Battle Experiment Juliet
• Industry Led Collaborative Execution
• Evolution of Shipboard Organic UAV Concepts
• Organic UAV Development Initiatives
• Shipboard Implementation
• Shipboard Operation
• Conclusions / Recommendations
Background
UAV
Integration
UAV Ops
Results
1
2
3
Topics
473rd MORS
1. FBE-J Experiment Background
• Navy Littoral Initiatives Assigned (July-Aug 2002)
– Demonstrate Reconfigurable Littoral Platform
– Demonstrate Netfires CONOPS in the Littoral
• Led Industry Collaborative Development– Organize as Sea Slice Team– Start Littoral Design with a Clean Sheet– “Be a Littoral Combatant” was Prime Requirement– Derive All Other Requirements
573rd MORS
Unique, Fast, Stable Platform with Fortuitous Proportions
Origin: Experimentation Platform Sea Slice
673rd MORS
100 Ft.
200 Ft.
300 Ft.
Sea SLICEHSV
105’ x 55’203.8 tonnes
“Joint Venture”(HSV XI)
313’ x 85’1250 tonnes
0
Skjold HSV144’ x 42’260 tons
Sea SLICE Provides The Speed and Seakeeping Performance of a Ship 3-5x times its Size
100 Ft.
ReferenceUSS Cyclone
170’ x 25’288 tons
FBE-J HSV Size Comparisons
773rd MORS
Integrated Experimental Platform
873rd MORS
Colors Not Representative
Sensors• Silent Sentry• Sea FLIR• Sea SAFIRE
KnuckleBoom Crane
Ku Band SATCOM
Netfires• Self Protect (SIM)• JLWL (Live Fire)• Aft Battery (SIM)• JWCS (Mobile)
Torpedo Launcher
35MM Millennium Gun
ElectroOpticalDirectorMast
Multi-missionModules
Torpedo Launcher
Final FBE-J Sea SLICE Configuration
973rd MORS
• Primary Experiment: Reconfigurability– Modular Mission Capability Implementation
– Swap Out Equipment Every Few Days– Reenter Fray With New Mission Configuration
• Netfires Man-in-the-Loop Naval CONOPS
• Front Line “Node” Enabling Net-Centric Warfare
• Sea SLICE Multi-mission Modules– Command & Control (Supports all other modules)– Netfires (390 Simulated Rounds + One Live Firing)– Torpedo Launchers (Simulated 4 Rounds)– 35 MM Gun Module (Simulated + Live Fire)– Passive Sensor Suite (3 FLIRs, Passive Radar) – Special Missions
– Unmanned Underwater Vehicle – Towed Mapping Sonar– SOF Support (VBSS)
Driving Sea SLICE Concepts for FBE-J
1073rd MORS
• Tasking– Equipment Mounting,
Transport, and Positioning– Rapid Sea SLICE
Reconfiguration– Support for Naval Fires
and Mine Warfare• Accomplishments
– Performed Multiple Concurrent Tasks
– Combined Self Protection Modules and Mission Modules • Lessons Learned
– Human Factors Investigation/Improvements Required– Strong Support for Side Scan Sonar Module– Gun Module Performed Well– Vert Rep Worked Well for STOM Support
Modular Mission Payload
1173rd MORS
Collaboration ofIndustry with Navy
Cost Effective Operation
Industry Resources and Support
Communications Suite
Concept Development and Validation
US Navy Venues and Scenarios
Industry Sea Trial Initiative
Vision for Collaborative Execution
1273rd MORS
• Form IPT and SubIPTs to Execute Integration & Test
• Manage Team at the Platform Level
• Invite Technology Collaborators and Vet Their Products
• Select Fielded Technologies (Intermediate Development Level)
• Form Advisory Group – Control Team Expectations
• Satisfy Navy Experiment Initiative Requirements, but…
• Start with Clean Sheet - “Be a Littoral Combatant”
• Allow for Overlapping Capabilities (Redundancy)
• Develop Agreements among Partners (Terms of Reference)
Team Building is a Social Process
Method for Collaborative Execution
1373rd MORS
Denny BakerM&S SubIPT
410 682-0166
Mark ZimmermanC4I SubIPT410 682-2017
Les BasakWeapons SubIPT
410 682-0608
Pam LatrobeSensors SubIPT
410 682-0929
Phil GreenwaldShip Integration
SubIPT410 682-1206
Roger StreeterShip Ops SubIPT
408 756-8514
Joe WenderothFBE-J IPT
410 682-1366
Tony Mannino(D)Steve MatelliWill KraftTony Mannino Angel MoralesCecil SecrestAlex Boon
as neededJohn Murphy*Mark AlberdingSteve Hanson FLIRMike Lewis Akron
Bob Fitzgerald(D)George GoetzJim PetrieJohn Murphy*
Jon Fleischer(D)Steve Matelli, SliceBob Fitzgerald, LchrWayne Civinskas*Michael DialJohn Stewart M&FCMike Lewis, AkronSteve Hanson FLIRNSWC-DD TorpGary Trimble UUVGary Nelson MMSOrest Ukrainsky CmbtBob Key VF C4IManassas C4I
Dave Sauter (D)David GillHoan NguyenDavid StoverJim PetrieCecil Secrest*JohnMurphy*
Tony Kopera (D)David GillBob Fitzgerald
IPT Manning Draft V6
Sea Slice Capt(USN)Sea Slice Crew
Steering CommitteeJoe Volpe OAJoe Ducas NWDC BDGerry Nifontoff SD BDNeil Zerbe C4I IPTGeorge Root AP IR&DAl Carney M&FC LEAPSShip Ops USNOrest Ukrainsky COMBATSSBrad Zell, FLIRBob Key, VF, UAV Sim
Steve Archbold VFLarry Fox US
Steve Hanson – FLIR
Dennis Freeman– Silent Sentry
Thomas James – COMBATTS
Steve Archbold-TLNN
Neil Zerbe Q70
Doyle Green NSWCMike Lewis Akron
GovernmentGuy Purser NWDCMike Dial BMHKevin Seavey BMH
Lots of Players Complex Communications
Sea Slice Team FBE-J IPT Partners
1473rd MORS
VRC-99ATCDLKuBand SATCOM 1
NP-3B
FBE-J SATCO
MNetwor
k XMbps
USS ComstockLSD-45
USS John Paul Jones
USS Fitzgerald
USS Coronado
USS BoxerLHD-4
VRC-99TSA
802.11
HSV
USS Lake Erie
FCTCPACSan Diego DREN
Cloud
NSWC DahlgrenVDD21
NAWC PaxJSF
NUWC NewportVSSGN
SSC San Diego
U2
F/A -18 ATARS
CDL
JTF CDRSuffolk
JFLCCLejuenn
eJFACCNellis
TeleportFt
Gordon
USA CompNTC
KuBand SATCOM 2
NCTAMS Wahiwa
CLPt Mugu
Sea Slice
NWDC Slide (with LM mods)
FBE-J Communications Architecture
6-9 AugUSN to PortVIP Tours
LM/Customer Days
Sea Slice MissionsDuring FBE-J
23-26 JulMIW-Q Routes Towed Sonar
UAV IPB CoordUUV MIW
31 July –2 AugSea SLICE Live Fire • 35MM vs Small
Boat Target• NetFires BTV Shot
29-30 JulNetfires High Vol
Calls for FireSTOM
JWCS Launcher to Beach
JV HSV Escort
30 JulASW
July 26-28Force ProtectionMIW with UUVs,
30 Jul ASW
Naval Fires Freeplay
Anti-Swarm
4-5 AugTime Sens. Tgt
Naval Fires
1
6
5
8
3
29JulASW
2
3 –5 AugSOF Support
VBSS
7
Planned & Executed
Planned & Not Executed
4
Challenging Schedule Provides Many Opportunities
1673rd MORS
• FBE J Proved Utility of Focused Mission Modules
– Spawned Focused Mission Ship and LCS Solicitations
– Rapid Reconfigurability Can Be Achieved
• Coordinated Small Boat Attacks are a Major Threat
– Need a Surface-to-Surface Weapon with Standoff Range
– Must Rapidly Find, Identify, and Attack Fast Attack Craft
• Anti-Small Boat System Requires:
– Persistent Surveillance with Organic Off Board Platform
– UAV Mission Module Integrated with Weapon System
– Generic Components (Launch, Control, Capture)
“Our” FBE J Conclusions / Recommendations
1773rd MORS
• Evolution of Shipboard Organic UAV Concepts
– Use Systems Orientation with Shipboard Demonstration
– Enable Weapons Engagement with UAV Technology
• Organic UAV Development Initiatives
– Design for Minimal Manning
– Strive for Routine, Persistent UAV Operations
• Shipboard Implementation
– ONR Demonstration Funding via Small Business (STTR)
– Develop Generic Components (Launch, Control, Capture)
– Define Mission Specialist Roles and Procedures
2. UAV Mission Module Integration
1873rd MORS
PilotLocations Flight Control
Computer
Control Module Cable Feed Trough
Control ModulePower Input
GPS antenna
RecoveryDevice & Camera
UAV Launcher
Sea Slice UAV Ops Demo Arrangements
1973rd MORS
Demo Shelters & Mission Mast
2073rd MORS
Shelter Loading On Sea Slice
2173rd MORS
Shelter Universal ISO Mounts
2273rd MORS
GPS UAV Control
Cameras
WX Station
UAVVideo
Mission Mast as Installed
2373rd MORS
Complex EMI/EMC Environment
2473rd MORS
UAV Recovery Path
Wind Direction
SW @ 7 Mph
Ownship Heading
Ownship Burble Direction
Burble Velocity = 20 + 8 = ~ 28 kts Wind Over Deck
Apparent Wind 20 Knots
Consider Wind Over the Deck
Ownship Heading Plan for UAV Recovery
2573rd MORS
Embedded Engineer
Valiant Workstation
Validate Minimal Manning Concepts
ANLAS / GUSS / Valiant Control Station
2673rd MORS
Demonstrate Automation Needs
Pilot with Manual Control
2773rd MORS
UAV Recovery Operations At-Sea
Speed ~15 kts
~28 kts
WP 81
WP 82
WP 83WP 84WP 95WP 96
WP 97
UAV
Awaiting Recovery Orbit(Starboard Side of Ship)
Step 4
Step 5
Sea SLICEStep 3~6 ktsWind
Stern
Starboard
BowPort
UAV Enters Recovery Pattern
Approach Turn
Up Wind Turn
Down Wind Leg
On Final Approach
Down Wind Turn
“Abeam”
Step 2
2873rd MORS
Pilot Position
~40 feet
Pilot View Point: Net or Arresting Line Capture
2973rd MORS
Pre-Launch Checks
3073rd MORS
• Shipboard Operation
– Launch Methods
– Manual and Automated Control
– Recovery Sequence
• Conclusions / Recommendations
– Shipboard Impact
– Mission Module Evaluation
– UAV Operations
3. UAV Ops Results
3173rd MORS
Silver Fox Launch from Sea Slice
3273rd MORS
Recovery System Stowed
3373rd MORS
Deploying Recovery System
3473rd MORS
Patent Pending
Net Recovery of Silver Fox
3573rd MORS
Recovered Sliver Fox
3673rd MORS
Patent Pending
A-SULCRS Developed Tail Hook
3773rd MORS
Tie Wrap on Arresting Line
Patent Pending
Arresting Line Configuration
3873rd MORS
Extended Recovery Cable
Patent Pending
Initial Arresting Line Engagement
3973rd MORS
• Launch:– 8 of 8 Successful UAV Pneumatic Launches with Tail Hook – Hand Launch and Bungee Launches are also Possible
• Control– Remote Operational Control (Mission Control)
• Drop Hook Executed Reliably• Flight Plan Transmit Verified
– Glide Slope Control• Generally Good for Positioning UAV for Recovery
– Auto Recovery Control• Requires Improved UAV Flight Control Accuracy for Success
• Recovery– Net Recoveries
• Promising, Especially with Tail Hook Net Capture• Comments: UAVs Design Tradeoff for Maritime Recovery Operation
– Arresting Line Recoveries• Requires More Testing for Characterization• Comments: Tail Hook and Latch Design Looks Promising
Demonstration Summary
4073rd MORS
Questions?
Sea SLICE Underway