PAKISTANPAKISTANWATER AND POWER DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYWATER AND POWER DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

PRESENTATION ENGR. MUHAMMAD SAMEER AZHAR

ENGR. MUHAMMAD FAROOQENGR. MOHSIN MASOOD KHAN

PRESENTATION ENGR. MUHAMMAD SAMEER AZHAR

ENGR. MUHAMMAD FAROOQENGR. MOHSIN MASOOD KHAN

JINNAH HYDRO POWER PROJECT

February, 2010February, 2010

HISTORY

• The joint agreement between government of Pakistan through WAPDA and federal republic of Germany was carried out on 13th Oct 1982 to implement the Programme for development of hydro power at barrages and Canal falls in the Indus plains.

HISTORY Continue……..• After extensive study 10 sites were

selected and Jinnah scheme was ranked as the 3rd under barrages.

• The feasibility study was started in Feb 1988 by Binnie and partners in association with ODA (overseas Development Administration),UK. and submitted to WAPDA on Jan 31st 1988.

HISTORY Continue……..

• The study envisaged construction of a project having installed capacity of 96 MW with 8 units & the design head of 4.7 meters with discharge rate 350 m3/s for each unit and energy out put of 688 GWH per annum on the basis of revised sediment model studies conducted at irrigation institute Nandipur.

LOCATION• Jinnah Hydro Power Project is proposed

on the right side of existing Jinnah Barrage as a by pass arrangement.

• It is located on the Indus River about 5 KM D/S of the town of Kalabagh in the District of Mianwali and 234 Km away from Islamabad.

LOCATION OF PROJECT

JINNAH BARRAGE

VIEW OF JINNAH BARRAGE

WHAT DOES LOW HEAD HYDEL MEANS?

• Lowland Plants

• Low Head Plants

• Hilly Area Plants

• Medium Head Plants

• Mountainous Region Plants

• High Head Plants

• Low head potential in Pakistan means, the potential available at barrages and canal falls in the plains of Punjab, Sind, NWFP and Baluchistan

Location of Dams, Barrages and Headworks

15

COUNTRYPOPULATION

(MILLION)HYDEL GENERATION

(MW)%AGE OF TOTAL

GENERATION

AUSTRIA 8 11853 58.3

BRAZIL 187 83752 76.6

CANADA 33 72660 59

EGYPT 75 2793 12.5

FRANCE 61 25200 11.1

GERMANY 82 4525 4.4

INDIA 1100 37000 17.1

INDONESIA 226 4519 15

IRAN 70 7442 9

ITALY 59 17459 12.3

MORROCO 32 1500 6.8

NORWAY 5 29040 99

POLAND 38 839 1.3

SWITZERLAND 8 13356 55.2

TURKEY 74 13608 25.4

USA 250 78200 7

PAKISTAN 166 6464 33.4

HYDROPOWER GENERATIONIN VARIOUS COUNTRIES OF THE WORLD

Reference: The International Journal on Hydropower & Dams, 2008.

16

PRESENT INSTALLED CAPACITY IN PAKISTAN

Thermal (GENCOs), 6590,

33. 4%

Thermal ( I PPs), 6155, 31. 3% WAPDA Hydro, 6464, 32. 9%

Nuclear, 462, 2%

WAPDA Hydro

Thermal (GENCOs)

Thermal (IPPs)

Nuclear

17

44903

35413

22353

17328

72169

101478

0

20000

40000

60000

80000

100000

120000

2007 2010 2013 2016 2019 2022 2025 2028

MW

PAKISTAN’S ELECTRIC POWER DEMAND (2007-2030)

YEAR

MW

18

239428

943

1292

1928

1634

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1800

2000

MW

1950-60 1960-70 1970-80 1980-90 1990-2000

2000-07

HYDEL POWER CAPACITY ADDITION IN LAST 6 DECADES

YEAR

19

WAPDA HYDEL STATIONS

IN OPERATION

* Under Rehabilitation

Sr. No.

ProjectInstalled Capacity

(MW)

Energy Generation

(GWh)

Commercial Operation Date

1 Tarbela 3478 15801 1977-93

2 Mangla 1000 5443 1967-94

3 Warsak 243 1009 1960-81

4 Ghazi Barotha 1450 7037 2003-04

5 Chashma Low Head 184 959 2001

6 Rasul 22 63 1952

7 Dargai 20 162 1952

8 Jabban* 20 155 1938-52

9 Nandipur 14 32 1963

10 Chichoki Mallian 13.2 23 1959

11 Shadiwal 13.5 38 1961

12 Others 6 29 1925-82

TOTAL 6464 30751

20

PAKISTAN’S HYDROPOWER POTENTIAL

(RIVERWISE SUMMARY)Sr. No.

River/ Tributary Power (MW)

1. Indus River 37780

2. Tributaries of Indus (Northern Areas) & NWFP 6006

Sub Total (1+2) 44746

3. Jhelum River 3143

4, Kunhar River 1435

5. Neelum River & its Tributaries 1844

6. Poonch River 397

Sub Total (3+4+5+6) 6819

7. Swat River & its Tributaries 2371

8. Chitral River & its Tributaries 2282

Sub Total (7+8) 4653

9. Schemes below 50 MW on Tributaries 1055

10. Schemes below 50 MW on Canals 408

Sub Total (9+10) 1463

TOTAL 57681

21

Identified Low Head Hydro Power Potential Sites

Potential Sites at Dams & Barrages

Hydro Potential of Individual Canal Falls

Development More Than 5 M

Hydro Potential of Combined Canal Falls

Development More Than 5 M

Sites Taken up by Private Sector

Advantages of LHHPCloser to the load centers.Short gestation periodAvailability of infrastructureRequired civil works are fully or at least

partially developedAttractive to Private SectorsLess Capital Required

LOW RISKS INVOLVEDLow Hydro-logical RiskNo Socio-economic or Environmental

RiskLess Technological RiskLess Construction Completion Risk

SALIENT FEATURES

• Installed Capacity  96 MW

• Gross Head 4.88 m

• Mean Annual Energy   688 GWh

• Design Discharge 2800 cumecs

• No. of Units 8

• Turn Key Cost $128 Million

• Implementation Period 4 - Yrs

. BARRAGE

Design Flood at flow rate 312000 cumecs

No: of gates are 56 Catchments area at

barrage is 286000 Km2

SALIENT FEATURES

Continue….

. HEAD RACE:Length 1300 mBed width 133 mSide slope 1:3Design discharge 2800 cumecs

SALIENT FEATURES

Continue….

POWER HOUSE: Machine Hall width 16.54m Length 62.27 m Height 11.00 m

Service Bay width 21.20 m Length 62.27 m

SALIENT FEATURES

Continue….

TAIL RACELength 500 m

Bed width 133 m

Side slope 1:3

Design Discharge 2800 cumecs

SALIENT FEATURES

Continue….

IMPLEMENTATION OF JHPP

• Amendment on the original contract has been agreed between WAPDA and DEC of china on Nov 23, 2005 on the basis of sovereign guarantee issued by the ministry of finance.

• Mobilization advance of US$ 19.20 million as 15% of the project cost has been received by the contractor.

• Possession of 751 Acres of land has been taken over with total cost of Rs. 84.00 million.

• Separate PC-I for O&M staff colony has been prepared and submitted to Ministry of Water & Power for approval.

• A joint venture comprising of M/s ACE, Nespak and NDC are Project Consultant.

IMPLEMENTATION OF JHPPContinue….

• After series of discussions with Dongfeng Electric Company (DEC) of China, project cost finalized as US$ 128 million on turn key basis. 

• Project commencement date is 18th February 2006.

• Unit No.1 & 2 will come into production in May 2010.

• Scheduled date of project completion is July 2011.           

IMPLEMENTATION OF JHPPContinue….

PROJECT LAY-OUT• Head Race Channel

• Tail Race Channel

• Power House

• Switch Yard

• The head race will off-take from right guide bank about 1300 m u/s of Jinnah Barrage.

• It has curved alignment of 500 m. • It becomes straight for about 800 m u/s of

Jinnah Barrage.

Head Race Channel

• The maximum pond level is 211.50 m.a.s.l and top level of embankment has been fixed at 215.00 m.a.s.l.

• The side slopes of the power channel are 1:3 and the bed level for the head race channel is fixed at 202.50 m.a.s.l.

Head Race Channel continue…

• The tail race having the length of 500 m will join the power house out flows to Indus River.

• The maximum design discharge of the power channel is 2800 Cumecs.

Tail Race Channel

Power House

• The Power house consist of 4 Turbine blocks and 1 service bay. Each turbine block consists of 2 units and service bay is provided on the left side the power house.

• It will be equipped with 8 pit type turbine having its speed 60 rpm.

Pit Type Turbine• For heads lower than 10 m, pit-type

turbines have been applied, with a speed increaser located between the runner and generator.

• Since 1955 over 180 machines have been put into operation all over the world with outputs from 50 kW to nearly 50,000 kW and diameter between 800 mm and 8400 mm.

Trend of Generator Output

Switchyard• An open 132 Kv

switchyard will be constructed on the right side of the power house and will be connected to 132/220 Kv Mari Daud Khel Grid station about 4 KM from the project through 132 Kv overhead transmission line.

PROJECT BENENITS

• Reduction of dependence on thermal power.

• Saving in foreign exchange.

• Employment opportunity during construction and operation.

• Improved standard of living and infrastructure.

• Socio-economic uplift of the area.

ENVIRONMENTAL & SOCIAL IMPACT

• Initial environmental examination shows no major impact except effect on fish migration in case the whole flow is diverted.

• There will be no significant effect on fish population / production.

• The project lies in dry arid climate area of kalabagh in mianwali.

ENVIRONMENTAL & SOCIAL IMPACT

continue….• There will be no loss of forest and wild life.• There will be no any effect on the cultural

and heritage.• Sociological impacts will be balanced by

the project benefit in terms of improved employment, infrastructure and standard of living.

PROGRESS OF PROJECT Physical  86.2 % as on 02.02.2010

PHYSICAL PROGRESSContinue….

POWER HOUSE Cutoff Curtain Completed. Dewatering a.  Drainage Channels Completed . b.  Drilling and Installation of Wells completed. c.  Installation of Pumps Completed.

Excavation  a.  Powerhouse Pit 100% b.  Headrace Channel 93.23% c.  Tailrace Channel 96.46%Headrace Embankment Filling 100% Transition Material 100% Riprap 100% Geo-textile 100%

PHYSICAL PROGRESSContinue….

Tailrace Embankment Filling 100% Transition Material 100% Riprap 100% Geo-textile 100% Switchyard & BM Road 30.12% Concreting  Powerhouse structure 67.34% Tailrace Channel 36.39%

PHYSICAL PROGRESSContinue….

CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES AS ON

FEB. 2009

POWER HOUSE

FOUNDATION WORK IN PROGRESS

FABRICATION WORK

FORMWORK IN PROGRESS

BATCHING PLANT

DEWATERING PROCESS

DEWATERING IN PROGRESS

DEWATERING IN PROGRESS

WORK IN PROGRESS

STONE PITCHING IN PROGRESS

CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES AS ON

FEB. 2010

Thanks For Your Kind

Patience