jila - center for science and technology policy...
TRANSCRIPT
JILA
UCCS
Past Science Advisors
Early Science AdvisorsEd David
NixonJay Keyworth
Reagan
Allan BromleyGHW Bush
Jack GibbonsClinton
Jack MarburgerGW Bush
Frank PressCarter
NealClinton
Threats to the future of U.S. Science Threats to the future of U.S. Science and Technologyand Technology
The University of ColoradoThe University of ColoradoBoulder, COBoulder, CO
October 5, 2005October 5, 2005Neal LaneNeal Lane
James A. Baker III Institute for Public PolicyJames A. Baker III Institute for Public PolicyDepartment of Physics and AstronomyDepartment of Physics and Astronomy
Rice UniversityRice University
OUTLINE
• A personal journey• How the White House works• Four “threats” to science and technology
and what a Science Advisor can do!
OUTLINE
• A personal journey• How the White House works• Four “threats” to science and technology
and what a Science Advisor can do!
Neal’s parking place
President’s parking place
Oval Office Oval Office
““Neal, Neal, howhow much did you say we need to spend on nanotechnology?”much did you say we need to spend on nanotechnology?”
It’s a team effort !
NationalAeronautic and Space
Administration
EnvironmentalProtection
Agency
Smithsonian Institution
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Other agencies
Commerce
Science Advisor
Other boards, councils, etc.
U.S. President
Independent Agencies
Major Departments
Science AdvisorOffice of Science and
Technology Policy
Office of Managementand Budget
Agriculture Health and Human Services
Interior Transportation Defense Energy
NSF-36
The Executive Branch
NIH USGSNOAANIST
Homeland Security
DARPA, ONR,AFOSR
NSTC
NNSA
with R&D agencies
Science and Technology in the U.S. GovernmentScience and Technology in the U.S. Government
NationalAeronautic and Space
Administration
EnvironmentalProtection
Agency
Smithsonian Institution
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Other agencies
Commerce
Science Advisor
Other boards, councils, etc.
U.S. President
Independent Agencies
Major Departments
Science AdvisorOffice of Science and
Technology Policy
Office of Managementand Budget
Agriculture Health and Human Services
Interior Transportation Defense Energy
NSF-36
NIH USGSNOAANIST
Homeland Security
DARPA, ONR,AFOSR
NSTC
NNSA
Science and Technologyare important to most Federal
Agencies The Executive Branch
with R&D agencies
Examples of Public Policy Issues that Relate Examples of Public Policy Issues that Relate to Science and Technologyto Science and Technology
Advances in science, engineering, and technology (Advances in science, engineering, and technology (R&D budgetR&D budget))Emerging technologies Emerging technologies -- National National NanotechnologNanotechnology Initiativey InitiativeEnergyEnergy production and consumptionproduction and consumptionNational and Homeland National and Homeland securitysecurity and counterand counter--terrorismterrorismEnvironmentEnvironment –– air/water, climate change, cleanair/water, climate change, clean--upupStorage of spent Storage of spent nuclearnuclear fuel and high level radioactive wastefuel and high level radioactive wasteInformation technologyInformation technology, computing, internet , computing, internet HealthHealth –– Human genome, proteomics, cloning, stem cells, AIDSHuman genome, proteomics, cloning, stem cells, AIDSInternational cooperationInternational cooperation in S&T (e,g, Carnegie Gin S&T (e,g, Carnegie G--8 meetings)8 meetings)EducationEducation and the technical workforceand the technical workforceSpaceSpace programprogramFoodFood safety, plant biotechnology (safety, plant biotechnology (GMO’sGMO’s))Policy onPolicy on research misconductresearch misconductSurprises !Surprises !
NationalAeronautic and Space
Administration
EnvironmentalProtection
Agency
Smithsonian Institution
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Other agencies
Commerce
Science Advisor
Other boards, councils, etc.
U.S. President
Independent Agencies
Major Departments
Science AdvisorOffice of Science and
Technology Policy
Office of Managementand Budget
Agriculture Health and Human Services
Interior Transportation Defense Energy
NSF-36
NIH USGSNOAANIST
Homeland Security
DARPA, ONR,AFOSR
NSTC
NNSA
Science and Technologyare important to most Federal
Agencies
One job of the Science Advisoris to coordinate S&T activities
across federal governmentwith R&D agencies
The Executive Branch
NationalAeronautic and Space
Administration
EnvironmentalProtection
Agency
Smithsonian Institution
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Other agencies
Commerce
Science Advisor
Other boards, councils, etc.
U.S. President
Independent Agencies
Major Departments
Science AdvisorOffice of Science and
Technology Policy
Office of Managementand Budget
Agriculture Health and Human Services
Interior Transportation Defense Energy
NSF-36
NIH USGSNOAANIST
Homeland Security
DARPA, ONR,AFOSR
NSTC
NNSA
Science and Technologyare important to most Federal
Agencies
One job of the Science Advisoris to coordinate S&T activities
across federal governmentwith R&D agencies
The Executive Branch
Including the White House
Domestic Policy CouncilNational Economic CouncilNational Security CouncilCouncil on Environmental QualityOffice of Management and BudgetOffice of Vice President
NationalAeronautic and Space
Administration
EnvironmentalProtection
Agency
Smithsonian Institution
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Other agencies
Commerce
Science Advisor
Other boards, councils, etc.
U.S. President
Independent Agencies
Major Departments
Science AdvisorOffice of Science and
Technology Policy
Office of Managementand Budget
Agriculture Health and Human Services
Interior Transportation Defense Energy
NSF-36
NIH USGSNOAANIST
Homeland Security
DARPA, ONR,AFOSR
NSTC
NNSA
with R&D agencies
The Executive Branch
Lobbyists
Industry
SpecialInterests
Consumers
SpecialInterests
Media
Media
Media
Industry
Lobbyists
Lobbyists
Consumers
Industry
SpecialInterests
ConsumersIndustry
Universities
Science Disciplines
Science and EngineeringSocieties
NGOs
NGOs
NGOs
Lots of voices !
OUTLINE
• A personal journey• How the White House works• Four “threats” to science and technology
and what a Science Advisor can do!
FOUR THREATS TO U.S. SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGYFOUR THREATS TO U.S. SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
•MONEY TO FUND SCIENCE
•PEOPLE TO DO SCIENCE
•PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE
•RESPECT FOR THE INTEGRITY OF SCIENCE
FOUR THREATS TO U.S. SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGYFOUR THREATS TO U.S. SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
•MONEY TO FUND SCIENCE
•PEOPLE TO DO SCIENCE
•PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE
•RESPECT FOR THE INTEGRITY OF SCIENCE
Research will get Squeezed in Future BudgetsResearch will get Squeezed in Future Budgets
XXXX
XXXX XX
$ 2. 6 trillion in FY06
$ 57 billion
$ 75 billion
(20% GDP)
(< 0.5 % GDP)
Outyear Outyear budget projections look grim!budget projections look grim!
FOUR THREATS TO U.S. SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGYFOUR THREATS TO U.S. SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
•MONEY TO FUND SCIENCE
•PEOPLE TO DO SCIENCE
•PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE
•RESPECT FOR THE INTEGRITY OF SCIENCE
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Talented students have been comingfrom abroad to study science and engineering- but that trendmay not continue !
FOUR THREATS TO U.S. SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGYFOUR THREATS TO U.S. SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
•MONEY TO FUND SCIENCE
•PEOPLE TO DO SCIENCE
•PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE
•RESPECT FOR THE INTEGRITY OF SCIENCE
What Do the American People Know?What Do the American People Know?(from survey done for NSF’s “SE Indicators” *)(from survey done for NSF’s “SE Indicators” *)
Plants produce oxygenPlants produce oxygenContinents have been moving for millions of yearsContinents have been moving for millions of yearsLight travels faster than soundLight travels faster than soundEarth goes around the sunEarth goes around the sunNot all radioactivity is manmadeNot all radioactivity is manmade
Earliest humans did not live with the dinosaursEarliest humans did not live with the dinosaursEarth takes one year to go around the sunEarth takes one year to go around the sunElectrons are smaller than atomsElectrons are smaller than atomsAntibiotics do not kill virusesAntibiotics do not kill virusesLasers do not work by focusing sound wavesLasers do not work by focusing sound waves
>70%
50%
* From NSF (National Science Board) Science and Engineering Indicators 2002, chapt. 7
What Do the American People Believe?What Do the American People Believe?(from various polls reported in NSF’s “SE Indicators” *)(from various polls reported in NSF’s “SE Indicators” *)
Psychic or spiritual healing Psychic or spiritual healing -- mind over body ( > 50%)mind over body ( > 50%)ESP (50%)ESP (50%)Haunted houses (>40%)Haunted houses (>40%)Ghosts (40%)Ghosts (40%)ET visits ( >30%)ET visits ( >30%)Astrology is scientific or “sort of” (40%)Astrology is scientific or “sort of” (40%)Evolution in schools Evolution in schools
teach only evolution (20%)teach only evolution (20%)teach with creationism (> 45%)teach with creationism (> 45%)do not teach evolution at all (16%)do not teach evolution at all (16%)
* From NSF (National Science Board) Science and Engineering Indicators 2002, chapt. 7
} > 60%> 60%
FOUR THREATS TO U.S. SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGYFOUR THREATS TO U.S. SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
•MONEY TO FUND SCIENCE
•PEOPLE TO DO SCIENCE
•PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE
•RESPECT FOR THE INTEGRITY OF SCIENCE
A Statement – “Restoring Scientific Integrity in Policymaking”, calling attention to misrepresentation and misuse of science bysome in the current Administration, was signed by 62 scientists,including many Nobel Laureates.
“Science, like any field of endeavor, relies on freedom of inquiry; and one of the hallmarks of that freedom is objectivity. Now, more than ever, on issues ranging from climate change to AIDS research to genetic engineering to food additives, government relies on the impartial perspective of science for guidance.”
President George H.W. Bush, April 23, 1990
The integrity of U.S. science has always been non-partisan
RESPECT FOR THE INTEGRITY OF SCIENCE
But something has changed:
FOUR THREATS TO U.S. SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGYFOUR THREATS TO U.S. SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
•MONEY TO FUND SCIENCE
•PEOPLE TO DO SCIENCE
•PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE ?
•RESPECT FOR THE INTEGRITY OF SCIENCE
Especially challenging in a postEspecially challenging in a post--9/11 world9/11 world
Einstein had advice for scientists:Einstein had advice for scientists:
“Concern for man and his fate must always form the chief “Concern for man and his fate must always form the chief interest of all technical endeavors…in order that the interest of all technical endeavors…in order that the creations of our mind shall be a blessing and not a curse creations of our mind shall be a blessing and not a curse to mankind. Never forget this in the midst of your to mankind. Never forget this in the midst of your diagrams and equations.”diagrams and equations.”
(Albert Einstein, speech at Cal Tech, February 1931)(Albert Einstein, speech at Cal Tech, February 1931)
Einstein had advice for all of us:Einstein had advice for all of us:
“Everything that is really great and inspiring is created “Everything that is really great and inspiring is created by the individual who can labor in freedom.”by the individual who can labor in freedom.”
(Albert Einstein , commencement Address to the graduates of (Albert Einstein , commencement Address to the graduates of Swarthmore, 1938 and quoted in Swarthmore, 1938 and quoted in Out of My Later YearsOut of My Later Years , 1950), 1950)
Becomes a citizen of the United States -a true “Patriot Act”
Benjamin Franklin1706-1790
Three American “Civic Scientists”
Albert Einstein1879-1955
Allan Bromley1926-2005
Thank you !