jihad and the wolfowitzes of the world

8/15/2019 Jihad and the Wolfowitzes of the World

1/4

Jihad and the Wolfowitzes of the World

Jihad Abu Az Zamman

without tanks, without cruise missiles, withoutsatellites, without a navy. They win without

airplanes and without the support of a superpower.All they have at their disposal is merely a belief...

So, how did it really happen? How could a tiny paramilitary group such as Hezbollah manage toshake the almighty, American-supported Jewish state; something that the Arab states haverelentlessly failed at doing for almost six decades?

In fact a similar question may be raised in reference to Iraqi insurgency. While it is rather evidentthat Saddams army was defeated by the overwhelming Anglo-American destructive power,

Islamic resistance is winning the battle on the ground both in Iraq and Afghanistan. Neither America nor Britain seem able to come up with a reasonable excuse for the growing number of deadly attacks against their invasion forces.

Though the armies of Arab states are occasionally defeated in the battlefield, though too manyArab statesmen happen to follow the path drawn by Washington with resolute determination,Islamic resistance, which is not recognised in any national form, is there to fight back. Moreover,Islamic defiance is unbeatable. The Israelis have been watching the growing wall of Muslimresistance for over two decades. In Palestine it is the Hamas and in Lebanon it is the Hezbollah. Inthis theatre, Islamic militants deliver one blow after the other to Israel. Similarly, the Americanarmy is chased on a daily basis by insurgency both in Iraq and Afghanistan. As much as the far

more powerful Soviets failed in Afghanistan, neither Israel, nor America nor Britain have thecapability of responding effectively to the emerging Islamic guerrilla warfare.

Once and for all we better face it. Arabs are far from being at their very best if they are operatingin the format of a national state. The Arab soldier may lack the necessary will to die for an idioticflag. Both in the case of Saddams Iraq or Nassers Egypt, once within a conflict, a growing gapreveals itself between the charismatic, assertive, far over the top demagogue leader and someserious malfunctioning performance in the battlefield. Unlike the American, British, French, andIsraeli soldiers who have proved throughout history to have some real tendency towards collectivesuicide for some empty promises shaped as ideology, the Arab platoon is slightly behind in

1


2/4

exhibiting this kind of idiotic national patriotic militant zeal. He may as well be just too clever for those kind of deadly games.

Should it be a big surprise? Not at all. Nationalism is a European concept, it has very little to dowith the Arab mentality, history and general affairs. National patriotism has never made seriousheadway into the Arab psyche. The division of Arabia and the Middle East into small nationalstates with borders and flags has never been a natural evolvement of the indigenous Arab people

themselves. Instead it was the outcome of some international political manoeuvring imposed uponArabs by the superpowers. The slicing of the near east into small national states was intended toserve the interests of Western imperial forces. In practice it was Britain and France who drew upthe borders of the Middle East already in 1916 (The Sykes-Picot Agreement) and it was Americawho joined in later just to reshape those borders to guarantee Israels safety as well as a constantoil supply.

With the lack of crude nationalist zeal, it isnt a big surprise that Arab state armies fail to providethe goods in the battlefield. Yet, the Hezbollah, the Hamas and the insurgents in Iraq andAfghanistan are agonising the Western armies. They manage to do so just with light weaponry:without tanks, without cruise missiles, without satellites, without a navy. They win without

airplanes and without the support of a superpower. All they have at their disposal is merely a belief, namely Jihad.

Looking at Iraq (or what is left of it), at Bin Laden (the myth), at the Hamas (the democraticallyelected Palestinian government) and the Hezbollah (the ultimate success story) it is rather clear.The Arab wins when and only when he fights as a Muslim, as a believer. Unlike the shallowWesterner soldier who gives his life for empty manmade slogans, the Muslim would give his lifefor a divine cause. I will spit it out: if there is any meaningful notion behind Arab nation thisnotion is Islam. The Muslim takes orders from the Almighty Lord. I may admit that if I myself,

being a secular had to choose between the call of a retarded American president and the Lord, Iwould obviously go for the latter.

However, it is rather obvious that the Wolfowitzes of this world fail to realise that Arabnationalism as defined in independent states is basically a myth. They mistakenly consider theArab territorial landscape as a genuine national reflection of some real authentic ethnic aspirationas well as geo-political considerations. In fact, such a perception has nothing to do with reality.Lebanon and Syria are one country, at least in the eyes of very many Syrians and Lebanese. Thenorth of Palestine is no different from Lebanon and the West Bank has been long considered aunified territory with Transjordan. When Lebanon is demolished by the Jewish states air mightand around a third of its population is displaced, the Syrians would be the first to providehumanitarian support. When Gaza is murderously and indiscriminately bombarded by the IDF, theHezbollah would be there to open a second front and to ease the pressure on their Palestinian

brothers. When American and British expansionist forces insist upon robbing Iraqi oil, it is theMuslim brotherhood who would stop them rather than the Iraqi army. Arab resistance is in practicean exercise in Islamic brotherhood. For those who still fail to get the picture, Jihad goes far beyondany Western sense of local national patriotism. Jihad is cosmic, yet it is personal.

While the Wolfowitzes of this world would insist upon dominating the Arab world in the name of democracy and some other quasi liberal ideas, it is the Islamic freedom fighter who crosses landsand seas just to serve the American GIs with the ultimate performance of human devotion. Whilethe Wolfowitzes of this world insist upon transforming Britain and America into an Israeli mission

2


3/4

force, it is the Muslim brotherhood that gives us good reason to believe that eventually, when thetime is ripe, peace will prevail.

For those amongst us who refuse to acknowledge what Islam is all about, I will mention that theArabic root of the word Islam is Salama which originates from the words Peace and/or Submission, a submission to God and peace to all humanity.

Indeed Jihad itself is a word that bears further analysis. It stems from the Arabic root word J-H-D,which means strive. Other words derived from this root include effort, labour, and fatigue.Essentially Jihad is an effort to practice religion in the face of oppression and persecution. At itshighest form it is fighting the enemy of Muslims and Islam. Certainly, Condi, Bush, Olmert and hisJewish state are the bitterest enemies of Islam. And yet, Islam defines the boundaries of Jihad.

The Quran tells us (Quran 2:190-193): Fight in the cause of Allah those who fight you, but do not transgress limits; for Allah loves nottransgressors. And slay them wherever you catch them, and turn them out from where they have turned you out;for tumult and oppression are worse than slaughter; but fight them not at the Sacred Mosque,

unless they (first) fight you there; but if they fight you, slay them. Such is the reward of those whosuppress faith. But if they cease, Allah is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful. And fight them on until there is no more tumult or oppression, and there prevail justice and faithin Allah; but if they cease, let there be no hostility except to those who practice oppression.

In short, unlike the brutal Israeli aggression and the murderous American zeal that know no limits,Islam restricts violence, furthermore, its aim is not domination, but peace. This will obviouslyhappen when Israeli occupation is ended and Palestinians return to their land and home. This willhappen when Zionised Anglo-American colonialism is totally defeated. This message is clear andnot open to negotiation.

Looking at the Hezbollah, at the Hamas and the insurgent war in Iraq doesnt leave much room for doubt. While many Arab nations have been defeated, Arab brotherhood, i.e., Islam is winning. If Iwere an Israeli who lived in occupied Palestine I would be rather worried. The excessive use of

power and indiscriminate killing of Lebanese, Palestinians and UN peace keeping soldiers is thedirect outcome of deep Israeli anxiety. The Zionist tactic is failing and they all know it. Their armydoesnt provide the goods anymore. By now, you may be able to guess why. Nationalism is foreignto Jews almost as much as it is foreign to Arabs. In fact, Zionism ceased being a local nationalmovement a long time ago. Since the Balfour Declaration (1917) more and more Zionists operateas a Jewish Ethnic lobby promoting Jewish global interests. For more than a while Zionism is notinterested solely in Eretz Israel i.e., promised land, instead, it intends upon transforming our

universe into a Promised Universe. This idea is known as Neoconservatism and its largely Elder Zionist messengers who spread it are active in London (http://eustonmanifesto.org), NYC andWashington (http://www.newamericancentury.org).

But time is running out for Neocon philosophy as well as its practitioners. I do not know whether history repeats itself in general but somehow, as far as Jewish History is concerned, the same talekeeps rewriting itself: it is a story of an obsessive relentless will to power that always ends intragic circumstances. It happened in the Middle Ages in Spain, it happened in17th century Polandand Ukraine (Bogdan Chmielnitzki), it happened in 20th century Europe and it seems as if something dramatic is about to happen in America.

3


4/4

When the American Jewish Committee (AJC) is manifestly engaged in dragging America into war in Iran all in the name of world Jewry (http://www.ajc.org/atf/cf/{42D75369-D582-4380-8395-D25925B85EAF}/Al_Qaida_Iran_Hizballah.pdf). When the Wolfowitzes of this world happenedto be the architects behind the criminal war in Iraq, one may find oneself wondering whether Jewsthemselves ever learn anything from their own history. I really prefer not to think about what isgoing to be the outcome of the current blunt Jewish war waging. Considering the emergingAmerican defeat in Iraq and growing international isolation, it is just a question of time before a

charismatic American figure points the finger at the Israeli lobby. Devastatingly enough, it isntonly Jews, many of them totally innocent, who are going to suffer when that happens. By the timeall the Wolfowitzes of this world realise that it is time to evade the American vengeance (what mayevolve into a new Jewish tragedy namely Coca Colacaust), they will probably try to escape toPalestine, God Forbid.

Clearly, Zionists and their Jewish state are highly engaged in perpetrating a new world war, wehave a good reason to believe that Olmert didnt rule out the possibility that the current conflict inLebanon may lead towards a further escalation with Syria and Iran. It obviously didnt stop him.Why should it stop him? As soon as the Israelis started to drop bombs on Beirut Bush and Blair rushed to support Israels right to defend itself.

The Wolfowitzes of this world have different names for the conflict they themselves created. Theyoften call it a cultural clash and they are pretty good in wrapping their naked murderous zeal withsome quasi humanist reasoning. More than anything they love to present themselves as themessengers of democracy. Yet, if indeed their notion of democracy is anything like the single-race Democracy, practiced in their dearly beloved murderous Israel, it isnt that surprising whytheir ideas do not gain ground anywhere.

Seemingly, for the sake of keeping their little racist Jewish state alive, the Wolfowitzes are happyto wage an all out war against Islam. So far Condi, Bush and Blair are showing support. TheWolfowitzes are over the roof but how to say it, half a million Lebanese have lost their homes as a

result.

Somehow, the Wolfowitzes of this world always fail to internalise that human beings are morallyorientated creatures. Indeed nations and people can live through some evil phases. Not that manyyears ago it happened in Germany, it now happens in America. Yet, human beings have somethingthe Wolfowitzes lack. They have an ethical correction mechanism; humans regret their wrongdoing, they have a conscience. America lived through McCarthyism but recovered, it stilltries to deal with its racist past and current racial discrimination, it has been dealing with its war crimes in Vietnam. America, no doubt will shake itself of its Zionist murderous phase. It justdoesnt have any other choice. When this happens the Wolfowitzes of this world will have to hide

behind the rock and tree, and the rock and tree will say: oh American, there is a Wolfowitz behind

me, I am scared, take him away! Help, help!-###-

July 28, 2006 Jihad Abu Az Zamman is an Israeli-born musician and writer, and a proponent of a secular and democratic one-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict in which the two peoples live in one state as citizens with equal rights and responsibilities.

4

jihad and the wolfowitzes of the world

Documents