jennifer owen*, tomek trzeciak and peter knippertz

1
Jennifer Owen*, Tomek Trzeciak and Peter Knippertz *Contact: [email protected]; School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK Severe European Cyclones: A Storm-Prone Situation Perspective Introduc tion • Intense winter storms are the most damaging weather phenomenon to afflict Europe. Therefore, forecasting them in weather and climate models is a priority. • The SEAMSEW project, financed through the AXA Research fund, aims to assess uncertainties in future projections of severe storms. • We can separate sources of uncertainty using the idea of a large-scale ‘storm-prone situation’ (SPS), and evaluating their representation in climate models. • First, we identified 31 severe European windstorms, based on the Storm Severity Index, which calculates how unusual the wind speed is (Leckebusch et al., 2008). Conclusions Selected 31 historic, severe European windstorms. Identified 4 jet stream types. Proposed new approach to storm-prone situations, using existing idea of Eady Growth Rate. Included effects of moisture. Mixed success in detecting storms. Success potentially related to jet stream type. Storm-Prone Situations Four Versions of Growth Rate QG dry •Shear •Dry stability •Coriolis parameter only •Lindzen & Farrell (1980). QG moist •Shear •Moist stability •Coriolis parameter only •Whitaker and Davis (1994) SG dry •Shear •Dry stability •Vorticity •Emanuel, Fantini & Thorpe (1987) SG moist •Shear •Moist stability •Vorticity •Emanuel, Fantini & Thorpe (1987) Emanuel, K., M. Fantini, and A. Thorpe, 1987: Baroclinic instability in an environment of small stability to slantwise moist convection. Part I: Two-dimensional models. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, v. 44, pp. 1559–1573. Leckebusch, G., D. Renggli, and U.Ulbrich, 2008: Development and application of an objective storm severity measure for the northeast Atlantic region. Meteorologische Zeitschrift, vol. 17 (5), pp. 575–587. Lindzen, R. and B. Farrell, 1980: A simple approximate result for the maximum growth rate of baroclinic instabilities. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, vol. 37, pp.1648–1654. Whitaker, J. and C. Davis, 1994: Cyclogenesis in a saturated environment. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, vol. 51, pp. 889–907. Method Use Eady Growth Rate to quantify baroclincity. Use quasi-geostrophic (QG) and semi- geostrophic (SG) equations to describe atmosphere Including effect of moisture means four versions identified. Calculate the four versions everywhere Average over the box (35-65 o N, 40 o E to 10 o E) → Search for high peaks, followed by sudden drops. Klaus QG dry QG moist SG dry SG moist Kyrill QG dry QG moist SG dry SG moist Xynthia QG dry QG moist SG dry SG moist QG dry QG moist SG dry SG moist Emma Figure 2: Showing 4 versions of growth rate (σ) for 1 October 2006 to 31 March 2007. Figure 3: Showing 4 versions of growth rate (σ) for 1 October 2007 to 31 March 2008. Figure 4: Showing 4 versions of growth rate (σ) for 1 October 2008 to 31 March 2009. Figure 5: Showing 4 versions of growth rate ( σ) for 1 October 2009 to 31 March 2010. Indentifying Storms Moisture accelerates growth SG moist is an upper limit, assuming atmosphere totally saturated everywhere in the domain Expect σ to peak just before the storm develops, and drop as the baroclinic energy is removed. Objectively identify peaks (shown as stars on plots) as exceeding 98 th percentile once in 48 hour period. Here, one storm of each jet stream type is presented. e-folding times typically 0.5-1.0 days. Klaus: behaves as expected. Emma: peak apparent in some versions, not all. Kyrill: large peak slightly after. Xynthia: no peak. Very different jet stream configuration to the others. Overall, mixed results as to whether there is a peak Storm Jet Type Kyrill Cross early Emma Edge Klaus Cross late Xynthia Split σ σ σ σ Wind speed (m/s) at 300hPa Klaus Kyrill Xynthia Emma Jet Stream Types • Once 31 storms selected, examined analysis data and tracked each storm. • Plotted jet stream in sections that move along with the track of each storm. • Four categories emerged. • Here, one example of each is presented

Upload: tosca

Post on 22-Feb-2016

54 views

Category:

Documents


4 download

DESCRIPTION

Severe European Cyclones: A Storm-Prone Situation Perspective. Jennifer Owen*, Tomek Trzeciak and Peter Knippertz *Contact: [email protected]; School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK. Introduction. Conclusions. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Jennifer Owen*,  Tomek Trzeciak  and Peter  Knippertz

Jennifer Owen*, Tomek Trzeciak and Peter Knippertz*Contact: [email protected]; School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK

Severe European Cyclones: A Storm-Prone Situation Perspective

Introduction• Intense winter storms are the most damaging weather phenomenon to afflict

Europe. Therefore, forecasting them in weather and climate models is a priority. • The SEAMSEW project, financed through the AXA Research fund, aims to

assess uncertainties in future projections of severe storms. • We can separate sources of uncertainty using the idea of a large-scale ‘storm-

prone situation’ (SPS), and evaluating their representation in climate models. • First, we identified 31 severe European windstorms, based on the Storm Severity

Index, which calculates how unusual the wind speed is (Leckebusch et al., 2008).

Conclusions

• Selected 31 historic, severe European windstorms.• Identified 4 jet stream types. • Proposed new approach to storm-prone situations,

using existing idea of Eady Growth Rate.• Included effects of moisture.• Mixed success in detecting storms. • Success potentially related to jet stream type.

Storm-Prone Situations

Four Versions of Growth RateQG dry

•Shear•Dry stability•Coriolis parameter only•Lindzen & Farrell (1980).

QG moist•Shear•Moist stability•Coriolis parameter only•Whitaker and Davis (1994)

SG dry•Shear•Dry stability•Vorticity•Emanuel, Fantini & Thorpe (1987)

SG moist•Shear•Moist stability•Vorticity•Emanuel, Fantini & Thorpe (1987)

Emanuel, K., M. Fantini, and A. Thorpe, 1987: Baroclinic instability in an environment of small stability to slantwise moist convection. Part I: Two-dimensional models. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, v. 44, pp. 1559–1573.Leckebusch, G., D. Renggli, and U.Ulbrich, 2008: Development and application of an objective storm severity measure for the northeast Atlantic region. Meteorologische Zeitschrift, vol. 17 (5), pp. 575–587.Lindzen, R. and B. Farrell, 1980: A simple approximate result for the maximum growth rate of baroclinic instabilities. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, vol. 37, pp.1648–1654.Whitaker, J. and C. Davis, 1994: Cyclogenesis in a saturated environment. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, vol. 51, pp. 889–907.

MethodUse Eady Growth Rate to quantify baroclincity.

Use quasi-geostrophic (QG) and semi-geostrophic (SG) equations to describe atmosphere

Including effect of moisture means four versions identified.

Calculate the four versions everywhere

Average over the box (35-65oN, 40oE to 10oE) →

Search for high peaks, followed by sudden drops.

KlausQG dryQG moistSG drySG moist

KyrillQG dryQG moistSG drySG moist

XynthiaQG dryQG moistSG drySG moist

QG dryQG moistSG drySG moist

Emma

Figure 2: Showing 4 versions of growth rate (σ) for 1 October 2006 to 31 March 2007.

Figure 3: Showing 4 versions of growth rate (σ) for 1 October 2007 to 31 March 2008.

Figure 4: Showing 4 versions of growth rate (σ) for 1 October 2008 to 31 March 2009.

Figure 5: Showing 4 versions of growth rate (σ) for 1 October 2009 to 31 March 2010.

Indentifying Storms• Moisture accelerates growth• SG moist is an upper limit, assuming

atmosphere totally saturated everywhere in the domain

• Expect σ to peak just before the storm develops, and drop as the baroclinic energy is removed.

• Objectively identify peaks (shown as stars on plots) as exceeding 98th percentile once in 48 hour period.

• Here, one storm of each jet stream type is presented.

• e-folding times typically 0.5-1.0 days. • Klaus: behaves as expected.• Emma: peak apparent in some

versions, not all. • Kyrill: large peak slightly after. • Xynthia: no peak. Very different jet

stream configuration to the others.• Overall, mixed results as to whether

there is a peak before every storm. • Might be related to jet stream type.

Storm Jet Type

Kyrill Cross early

Emma Edge

Klaus Cross late

Xynthia Split

σ

σ

σ

σ

Wind speed (m/s) at 300hPa

KlausKyrill

XynthiaEmma

Jet Stream Types• Once 31 storms selected, examined analysis

data and tracked each storm. • Plotted jet stream in sections that move along

with the track of each storm. • Four categories emerged.• Here, one example of each is presented