jeju, 13 – 16 may 2013standards for shared ict patent offices and sdos cooperation development dr...
TRANSCRIPT
Jeju, 13 – 16 May 2013 Standards for Shared ICT
Patent Offices and SDOs cooperation development
Dr Michel Goudelis, Director Telecommunications,
EPO
Document No:
GSC17-IPR-06
Source: European Patent Office
Contact: Michel Goudelis, EPO ([email protected])
Ged Owens, EPO ([email protected])
GSC Session:
IPR WG
Agenda Item:
5.1
Ged Owens, Coordinator Public Policy, EPO
GSC17-IPR-06
Standards for Shared ICTGSC-17, Jeju / KoreaGSC-17, Jeju / Korea 2
OverviewOverview
• Importance of cooperation between patent and
standardisation systems
• High quality of EPO patent examination process
• EPO cooperation with Standards Development Organisations
• Future outlook and next steps
GSC17-IPR-06
Standards for Shared ICTGSC-17, Jeju / KoreaGSC-17, Jeju / Korea 3
Importance of cooperation between patent Importance of cooperation between patent and standardisation systemsand standardisation systems
• More interaction between traditional technical areas
– especially incorporation of ICT into all aspects of life
• More competition and higher value of intangible assets
• Shorter life cycles, accelerated pace of technological development
• More sophisticated digital technology in Telecommunications, Audio Video and
Electronics
• Increased competition in the Telecommunications market
• Standards linked more and more to patents
GSC17-IPR-06
Standards for Shared ICTGSC-17, Jeju / KoreaGSC-17, Jeju / Korea 4
Quality of EPO patent processQuality of EPO patent process
• EPO has considerable collections of patent and non-patent literature
across many technical areas
• Standards documents acquired via public databases or through
individual agreements with SDOs
• Specific needs of EPO led to agreements with providers and SDOs
• Patent Offices' main interest are early drafts, more than final
resulting standards.
GSC17-IPR-06
Standards for Shared ICTGSC-17, Jeju / KoreaGSC-17, Jeju / Korea 5
Granting high quality patentsGranting high quality patents
Critical EPO requirements:
• Patent applications must meet all patentability criteria, including novelty, inventive step, but
also clarity and conciseness
• EPO should have efficient search services updated with the most pertinent patent
documents, as well as published literature and standardisation documents, searchable as
much as possible by a uniform search engine
• Entrusted examiners are aware of new technical developments
• Entrusted examiners (specialised in field) are aware of importance of standards
documentation
GSC17-IPR-06
Standards for Shared ICTGSC-17, Jeju / KoreaGSC-17, Jeju / Korea 6
EPO Cooperation Agreements with SDOsEPO Cooperation Agreements with SDOs • In 2012 and 2013 EPO renewed MoUs with ETSI and IEEE-SA, widening the
scope of cooperation in both new agreements.
• Cooperation Agreement in place with ITU since 2011: cooperation intensifying
• First agreement concluded with IEC 2012 gives EPO access to IEC documentation for the purposes of the patenting process in all its phases
• Meetings and discussions with a number of international and national SDOs
• Contribution to international fora on interrelations between Patents and Standards
• Informing applicants and other patent system stakeholders of EPO approach
GSC17-IPR-06
Standards for Shared ICTGSC-17, Jeju / KoreaGSC-17, Jeju / Korea 7
Standards documents available for EPO examination
Standards and contributions from: • 3GPP• ETSI• ITU• IEEE--SA• IETF
To be added in 2013: • 3GPP2 Standards and contributions• OMA Standards and contributions
• Cryptography and Data Security Standards and Directives (IACR later also USENIX, BSI, NIST, ARXIV), expected in 2013/2014
GSC17-IPR-06
Standards for Shared ICTGSC-17, Jeju / KoreaGSC-17, Jeju / Korea 8
Strategic directions for the cooperation with SDOsStrategic directions for the cooperation with SDOs
• Promote and expand current policy concerning patents and standards
• Conclude agreements with further SDOs in priority areas, including new and expanding
technologies
• Priority areas : Telecommunications, Audio Video and Computer technologies
– Priorities in standards documents acquisition defined by the patent examination
experts in technical fields
• Cooperate with SDOs to standardise format of standards documentation (bibliographic
data for searching, XML format, templates) to increase efficiency and effectiveness of
searches
• Promote linking of SDO essential patent declaration databases in real time to EPO
publically available patent document databases, to increase overall transparency.
GSC17-IPR-06
Standards for Shared ICTGSC-17, Jeju / KoreaGSC-17, Jeju / Korea 9
Challenges for the EPO Challenges for the EPO cooperation with SDOs
• Despite proliferation of IPR in standards and increased reference to
standards in patent applications, approach by SDOs still varies widely
• Advantages of cooperation with some SDOs still not on favourable terms
and conditions for EPO, despite a win-win situation
• Considerable cost of acquisition and processing of standards
documentation and necessary bibliographic data for EPO
• Awareness of all stakeholders of importance, and status of standards
documentation as relevant prior art
GSC17-IPR-06
Standards for Shared ICTGSC-17, Jeju / KoreaGSC-17, Jeju / Korea
• In many technical areas with high number of industrially and commercially
important patent applications, a high proportion of pertinent prior art comprises
standards documentation
– quality and legal security of granted patents in these areas without search in
standards documents would not be acceptable
• Importance of standards documentation still increasing
• MoU and cooperation agreements make commitment to cooperation and
exchanges irrevocable
• Legal security encourages innovators to participate with security in standards
developing procedure
Results of EPO cooperation with SDOs
GSC17-IPR-06
Standards for Shared ICTGSC-17, Jeju / KoreaGSC-17, Jeju / Korea 11
Following Actions/GoalsFollowing Actions/Goals
• Extend and ameliorate cooperation with SDOs where
agreements exist
• Establish new agreements where appropriate, especially in
further ICT sectors and/or new important geographical areas
• Work with SDOs to standardise documentation to optimise
efficiency and effectiveness of searches
GSC17-IPR-06
Standards for Shared ICTGSC-17, Jeju / KoreaGSC-17, Jeju / Korea 12
Supplementary SlidesSupplementary Slides
GSC17-IPR-06
Standards for Shared ICTGSC-17, Jeju / KoreaGSC-17, Jeju / Korea 13
Key facts about the unitary patent
• Basic principles – a European patent granted under the EPC– unitary effect for the territories of the 25 EU member states currently
participating, at the applicant's request– co-existence with the existing European patent and national
patents– validated in one single administrative step by the EPO for all the
participating states in the language in which it was granted– language regime being finalised; transition measures foreseen
• ObjectiveEuropean Council Presidency andEU Commission intend to havethe first unitary patent granted in 2014
GSC17-IPR-06
Standards for Shared ICTGSC-17, Jeju / KoreaGSC-17, Jeju / Korea 14
Advantages
• For inventors– protection in one single step for the 25 states currently participating– significant cost savings (translation, validation, administration)– simplified validation procedure (instead of up to 25 different
procedures)– simplified and more cost-efficient renewal procedure– increased legal certainty due to uniform litigation system
• For Europe– optimal protection in the participating states as a whole– better framework conditions for innovative companies and
organisations– simplified European protection mechanism for companies from
outside Europe– improved competitiveness of the European patent
GSC17-IPR-06
Standards for Shared ICTGSC-17, Jeju / KoreaGSC-17, Jeju / Korea
Europeanpatentapplication
Filing andformalitiesexamination
Search report with preliminaryopinion onpatentability
Grant ofEuropeanpatent
Refusal or withdrawal of application
Substantiveexamination
The unitary patent as a European patent
UNITARY PATENT
for the territories of the 25 participating states
At the request
of the patent proprietor
Limitation/revocation/oppositionproceedings
Appealproceedings
Same grant procedure as for classic European patent
The unitary patent replaces the individual effects of the European patent
in the 25 participating states
15