3..

S2C15SE0026 2.3029 LITTLE TURTLE LAKE 010

REPORT ON

MAGNETIC SURVEY

J.E. Nelson Claim K.488949

Bad Vermillion Lake, Mine Centre

BEARDMORE August 10, 1979

By J.E. NelsonOntario Licensed Prospector

INTRODUCTION AND HISTORY

The property consists of one unpatented mining claim in the lake on the southwest shore of Bad Vermillion Lake approximately one mile south of Mine Centre, Ontario. The south shore of the lake is the south boundary of the claim. On the shore is patented claim J041. The remains of the old mill of the Golden Star mine are located on the shore of the lake. An estimated 35,000 tons of tailings were dumped into the lake during the operation of the mill during the period of 1897 to 1901. The mine was 2,700 feet south of the lake.

GEOLOGY

The rock of the area is a series of changing formations. The gold bearing formation of the Golden Star Mine is a massive porphyry and volcanic greenstone of Huronian age cut by numerous dykes of greenstone and felsite, bounded on the south by a conglomerate and protogine (a type of irruptive granite). The conglomerate is the oldest of these formations. To the north the rock is a felsite schist becoming progressively harder northward extending to the shoreline of Bad Vermillion Lake.

ACCESS TO PROPERTY

From the Mine Centre Garage on Highway 11, a road goes to the lake and a dock 1/4 mile south. The claim is a 1/2 mile south of Highway 11.

CLAIM DETAIL

The claim number is K.488949It is unsurveyed and joins J041 on the shore of Bad

Vermillion Lake immediately to the south. The work was performed by Montand Contractors Limited.

PERSONEL

The survey was carried out by J.E. Nelson, J.S. Nelson, lan Matthews and Dave Dyson. Fefc^uft/-/;^//? 7 4 "t O P\b*ch i. /H7*?

METHOD OF SURVEY

A picket line grid was laid out on the ice and stations marked with laths. There was one base line and cross picket lines were laid out every hundred feet and pickets were established at 100 foot intervals along the picket lines.

Readings were taken in gammas of the vertical component of the earth's magnetic field (non-absolute), by the means of an ARVELA MAGNETOMETER. Readings were taken at 100 foot intervals along the picket lines. Total baseline and picket line mileage was 3.75 miles. Magnetic readings were taken and plotted on the map. All readings were corrected for

diurnal and day-to-day effects before plotting. The instrument was checked into the magnetic control point shown on the map past the west boundary of the claim, five times daily.

RESULT OF MAGNETIC SURVEY

The readings were uniform and flat showing so anomalous conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

There are no magnetically mineralized zones indicated which could be potential drilling targets. Diamond drilling on this claim is eliminated.

Submitted by,

Q*.J.E. Nelson,Ontario Licensed Prospector

BEARDMORE, Ontario August 11,1979

D2.3*39 LITTLE TURTLE LAKE OSO

LANDS ADMINISTRATE

BRANCH

REPORT ON

Testing by dredging and diving,

Lake Bottom, underlying claim K.488949

Bad Vermillion Lake, Near Mine Centre, Ontario

BEARDMORE, Ontario August 10, 1979

By J.E. Nelson, O.L.P. ( Ontario Licensed Prospector)

INTRODUCTION AND HISTORY

The property consists of one unpatented mining claim in the lake on the southwest shore of Bad Vermillion Lake, approx imately one mile south of Mine Centre, Ontario. The south shore of the lake is the south boundary of the claim. On the shore is patented claim J041. The remains of the old mill of the Golden Star mine are located on the shore of the lake. An est imated 35,000 tons of tailings were dumped into the lake during the operation of the mill during the period of 1897 to 1901. The mine was 2,700 feet south of the lake.

GEOLOGY

The rock of the area is a series of changing formations. The gold-bearing formation of the Golden Star Mine is a massive porphyry and volcanic greenstone of Huronian age cut by numerous dykes of greenstone and felsite, bounded on the south by a con glomerate and protogine ( a type of irruptive granite). The conglomerate is the oldest of these formations. To the north the rock is a felsite schist becoming progressively harder northward extending to the shoreline of Bad Vermillion Lake.

OBJECT OF WORK PERFORMED

To survey bottom of the Lake for rock outcroppings and the type of bottom and to determine extent of tailings in the lake and the depth of overburden.

ACCESS TO PROPERTY

From the Mine Centre Garage on Highway 11, a road goes to the lake and a dock a 1/4 mile south. The claim is a 1/2 mile south of Highway 11.

EQUIPMENT USED

62 passenger bus completely equipped to accomodate 6 people

Hannah Experimental dredge

4" Keene dredge

2 boats and motors

Air compressor, Hooka Diving capability to 50' - two divers at a time

Diving suits wet and dry, scuba gear

Global Orbiter concentrator

20-50 Power Microscope

Sundry gear and cooking equipment

OPERATIONS

The crew and equipment noved to Bad Vermillion Lake at Mine Centre on August 25, 1978, and set up camp in the bus.

SERSONEL

The work was performed by qualified divers, John Girard, Jeff Nelson, J.E. Nelson, A. Hannah, and D. Cava. Leo Syrja was the cook.

WORK PERFORMED

The crew worked dredging and diving, surveying the lake bottom. They completed the work on September 17, 197fi.

The area of the tailing dump was tested for depth of water and extent of the tailing dump. This shown by drawing 2.

Dredging was performed on tail dump area in five major dredging locations. The tailings became fluid and kept flowing into the dredging sites. It was very difficult to get down to the bottom. This was achieved in only 2 cases. Locations one and two. Scuba divers were used to make traverses of the claim in an organized manner. Traverses were made every 200' starting at the number two post going north for approx. 500' into the lake. Seven traverses were made. It was found that the water was averaging about 15 feet deep 200 ' out in the lake. The water gradually became deeper. The bootom is clay and sand except near the shore. Sand was covering clay in some places with varying thickness up to several feet. Five hundred feet from shore, the water varied in depth, some deep spots over 40'.

Concentrates from dredge table mats were removed by washing in five gallon pails. Concentrates were further concentrated in the Global Orbiter and assayed. The concentrats were examined by mictroscope to check for presence of free gold and sulphides. Various assays were done for gold content.

CONCLUSIONS

Gold was confirmed to be present in the sand and gravel of the lake bottom and shores. Sulphides are usually present in minor amounts. Very little free gold was found, however it is present under the microscope in polished sections made at Lakehead University vy Mr. Ron Bennet. Because of placer probabilities future diving and test work will be done.

Gold from dredge concentrates tested at l.OSOz./ton.

Tailings averaged from sites. Sites 1,2 and 3 tested at 0.32 Sites 4 and 5 tested at 0.25 Sand PR-1 assayed nil

FURTHER WORK DONE

During January, February, March and April of 1979 the bus was located on ice as shown on accompanying maps. A building with a diesel lighting plant, Triffley concentrating table, grumman rupp pumps etc. was set up. A magnetometer survey was performed. Drilling was done by Robert Dodds Ltd. to determine

the location, extent and grade of the underwater tailing dumps Test concentration work was done on the tailings. Approx imately $25,000.00 was spent on this work.

Yours truly,

J.E. NelsonOntario Licensed Prospector

gAMPLES (S) FROM

THUNDER BAY TESTING LIMITEDBALMORAL COMPLEX, BALMORAL AND SIBLEY DRIVE, THUNDER BAY, ONTARIO, P7B SN) t TELEPHONE 623-5271

ASSAY LABORATORY-CHEMISTS-GEOCHEMISTS

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

Montain Contractors Ltd. o/o Mr. Eric Nelson 1010 Waverly Park Towers Thunder Bay, Ontario

RECEIVED November 3, 1978 LAB. NO. 78A831

SAMPLES (S) OF P^^P

j tT SUBMITTED TO US SHOW RESULTS AS FOLLOWS:

*AU ASSAYS ARE BY ATOMIC ABSORPTION SPECTROSCOPE*

CLIENT NO.

GOLD 02/T

SILVER OZ'T

COPPER li

NICKELK

ZINC

0.25

SainpJes, pulps and rejects discarded after one month.

THUWPER BAy TESTING LIMITED,

Vat td November 6, 19?6

SERVING NORTHWESTERN ONTARIOMember of the Canadian Testing Association

SAMPLES (S) FROM

THUNDER BAY TESTING LIMITED6AI MORAL COMPLEX, HALMORAL AND SIULEY DRIVE, THUNDER BAY, ONTARIO, P7B 5N3 ' TELEPHONE 62J-5278

ASSAY LABORATORY-CHEMISTS--GEOCHEMISTS .

or

- RECEIVED

Montain Contractors Ltd. c/o Mr. E. tfolson 1010 Wavorly Pork Towora Thunder Ray, Ontario

October 2U, 1978 LAB.

SAMPLES (S) OF

SUBMITTED TO US SHOW RESULTS AS FOLLOWS:

*\LL ASSAYS ARE BV ATOMIC ABSORPTION SPECTROSCOPE*

CLIENT NO.

GOLD OZ 'T

SILVER 02 -'T

COPPER NICKEL ZINCV,

-1- 0.32

; SampJes, pulps arid discarded af.Lx.-r ono month.

THUWPER M V TESTJWG

Voted'-. October 26, 1978•

PCAR. Katthtws

SERVING NORTHWESTERN ONTARIO ' , Member of the Canadian Testing Association '

SAMPLES (S) FROM

THUNDER BAY TESTING LIMITEDBALMORAL COMPLEX, BALMORAL AHD S IBLEY DRIVE, THUNDES 6A 1, ONTARIO, P7B SN3 ' leLfPHONE

ASSAY LABORATORY-CHEMISTS-GEOCHEMISTS

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

Mr. Eric Nelson Montain Contractors Ltd, 1010 Waverly Park Towers Thunder Bay, Ontario

RECEIVED September 21, 1978 LAB. MD, 78A810

SAMPLES (S) OF

SUBMITTED TO US SHOW RESULTS AS FOLLOWS J

ARE 8^ ATOMIC AB50RFrjM SPECTROSCOPE*

CLIENT NO.

R-l

R-2

PR-1——

——

——

——-.—

COLD ,OZ 'T

0.02

0.08

NilM** M

SILVER 02 'T

M**M

MM

———

Ml* M

COPPER

MM* M*

———

•••M**

———

NICKEL K

——

——

——

——

ZINC

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

—— |

~~~

—— |

—— 1

——

S, puJ]);j d lld J'

discarded at ter one month.THUWPCR m TESTIWG LJMJTEt

September 22, 1978PeA

'SERVING NORTHWESTERN ONTARIO 1 Member of the Canadian Testing Association

iCCNTAI Of DtvtLOPPCMtNT TCCHNOkOOIOUI Ot k'tCOLC COCVT 11MNIOOI DC MONTftfAL

lABOftATOIRE DE OtOCHIMIS ANALYTlOUE

COP

Mr. S. Hannah 6060 Cftn St-Luc, Montreal, QuSboc

RAPPORT

Analyse noi 7S-732

Analyoe eeui quantitative des figments aucSro otomiqufi supSrieur i 22

S&nplo bottle!

Analyoe no: 78-733

bottle

Tc - O - 12 ZCu " 0.3 - 0.6 2 Zn - O.'8 - 1.2 2 Pb - 1.0 -'1.4 Z Aa0,05 - 0.15 Z

Pt " ^OA 02/T

Analyse no: 78-734

Analyoo eeni quantitative ties (slSaante nus^ro i 11i /.j.

rock: Pe, As B 0,8 - 1.2 %Nb - 0.1 - 0.2 SSr " 40 - 60 ppnZu, Cu " DO - 120 ppa

Analyse no: 78-735

Simple rock Au - 2,29 oz/T '

Le 13 septeabre 1978

eer 10/0

August 2 8, 1 979

E . P . Anderson,Ministry of Natural Resources,Department of Mines,Whiney Block,Room 6450,TORONTO, Ontario

Dear Sir:

The Arvela Magnetometer used for the survey was purchased from Dr. M.W. Bartley. Some information is being obtained from him and this will be sent to you shortly.

Yours truly,

J. E. Nelson

JN/jen

IROBERT DODDS LimitedCONSULTING GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS

S2C15SE8826 2 .3029 L ITTLE TURTLE LAKE

FEASIBILITY STUDY GOLDEN STAR MINE TAILINGS

MINE CENTFE, ONTARIO

030

Y 16 19?9

i ra-, aria*

Our Reference Nurrber R79109 March, 1979

Prepared For:

D. H. Annala 400 Tudor Court,

Thunder Bay, Ontario

S*

Distribution: (3) copies (1) copy

D. H. AnnalaItobert Dodds Limited

/ed KENORAMINING D1V.

E y ^ l V EMAY \ 6 1979

AM

B

l

l

l

l

\

Reference Nunber R79109

1.0 INTRDDUCnCN

D. H. Annala, on February 21st, 1979, oormiissioned Robert Dodds Limited [

to undertake an investigation at a mine tailings dunp located on

Bad Vermilion Lake, approximately 2 km. (1.5 mi.) south of the

settlement of Mine Centre, Ontario. The site is designated as Mining

Claim K488949 of the Kenora Mining Division, District of Rainy River,

owned by J. E. Nelson and Associates. It is entirely a water claim.

Details of the surrounding claims at the time of the investigation arei

shown on Mining Maps M2474 and M2433 of the Kenora District and reprodi

in part in this report on Drawing No. 1.

Ihe purpose of this investigation was threefold:

1. To assess the aerial extent and thickness, hence the volume

of the tailings, and the quality of the tailings with

respect to gold content;

2. To assess the feasibility of mining, concentrating and

refining the tailings to produce marketable gold, including

reoonmending methods of doing so;

3. To discuss any associated problems, with respect to mining

methods and environmental concerns of the proposed operations.

Reference Number R79109 .....5

3.0 SITE CESCRIPTICN AND GEOLOGY

The site is located on the south shore of Bad Vermillion Lake as shown

on Drawing No. 1. Present on the site was a bus converted to living

quarters as well as a building housing a test concentrating table, global

orbitor, power generator and work area. Access to the work site for the

drilling unit was via a plowed road over the snow and ice- covered

lake from a point west of the village of Mine Centre, on the north

shore of Bad Vermillion Lake.

The rock of the area is a series of changing formations. The gold- beard

formation of the Golden Star Mine is a massive porphyry and volcanic

greenstone of Huronian age cut by numerous dykes of greenstone and

felsite, bounded on the south by a conglomerate and protogine, ( a type

of irruptive granite). The conglomerate is the oldest of these formations,

To the north the rock is a felsite schist becoming progressively harder

northward extending to the shoreline of Bad Vermillion Lake.

Reference Number R79109 . t t*.O

4.0 FIEU3WORK

The fieldwork, carried out between February 21st and March 2nd, 1979,

consisted of advancing 23 boreholes over the tailings area by washboring

methods, using a Longyear 24 Drilling Unit equipped for soils sampling

and testing. Drilling was carried out from the ice surface. Standard

penetration testing was performed on a continuous basis at most locations

in order to assess the depth and extent of the subnerged tailings and

to obtain representative samples. Dynamic cone penetration testing only

was carried out at other locations in order to determine depth to the

underlying rock. At one location, two bulk samples representing the

entire thickness of the tailings stratum were obtained following a

continuous sampling operation. Shear strength parameters were obtained

in the cohesive material encountered by in- situ testing methods, for

the design of possible mining methods.t

Sampling, in- situ testing and borehole positioning was conducted under

the direct supervision of an experienced geologist of this firm.

All samples obtained were returned to our laboratory for further

examination and testing.

Reference Number R79109 /.....10

5.0 DB5CRIPTICN OF TAILINGS OCNT'D

5.3 Interpretation of Findings

Drawing No. 3 is a thickness contour map of the tailings (sand),

which has been drawn based on the observations within the twenty- three

boreholes and from geological evidence found and inferred.

Further calculations, based on this map, result in a volume of

235,212 ft.^ of tailings contained. Assuming an average dry unit weight

of 100 pcf, the total weight of tailings to be found in this area is

11,760 Tons, approximately 1/3 of the 35,000 Tons reported to have

been dumped from the old mining operations.

Records of tailings dumping processes are not available at this time.

Waste was either dumped by a conveyor system from a height in a '

single pile, or piped out in a slurry at lake level or slightly*

above.

Should the first method have been used, two explanations for the

diminishmant of the tailings are apparent:

1. A slope or foundation failure of the cone- shaped pile,

removing tailings to great depths beyond the shallow depths

.11

Reference Number R79109 .....14

6.0 PROCESSING OF TAILINGS OCNT'D

6.2 Concentrating cent'd

The concentration of Xanthate used in roost flotation processes is in the

order of 50 ppm or less. Some of the Xanthate is removed with the

concentrate.

It is suspected that sane of the gold in the tailings will occur as

free gold. Therefore in order to effect high recoveries it would be

necessary to pass the slurry for the flotation process over fibre

riffles or other similar methods in order to trap the free gold.

The flotation process will generally concentrate the tailings in the

ratio of between 10:1 and 30:1. In other words, for every 300 Tons

of tailings processed there would be between 10 and 30 Tons of

concentrate. At this stage it is considered nore feasible to ship the

concentrate to an operating mill for smelting rather than attempting

to set up a smelter on site.

.15

Reference Number R79109

8.0 REXXMMENDATICNS

Due to the relatively small volume of the tailings deposit consideration

should be given to processing waste rock and tailings from other sites

in the area. This would involve transporting the ore to the concentrator

or moving the concentrator to the site. The latter alternative has the

disadvantage of requiring a new tailings disposal site with its inherent

environmental problems.

The feasibility of reprocessing the tailings at this site will depend

primarily upon:

1. Availability and efficiency of a portable concentrator.

2. Availability of an existing smelter.

3. Costs of engineering, licensing, equipment, concentrating,

transportation, smelting and clean- up.

4. Quality of concentrate and price smelter will pay, for the

delivered concentrates.

5.. World price of gold.

6. Availability of Federal and Provincial Government assistance.

t Reference Nurrber R79109A....25

All the foregoing and attachments respectfully submitted as our

records and report of findings and conslusions.

RCBERT DODDS LIMITED

ROBERT B. DQDDS, Ph. D., P. Eng. DEMETRI N. GBORGIOU, B. Se.

Reference Nurrber R79109

9

*

BH No.

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

IS

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

ice/Vrater depth (ft.)

5.0

5.0

20.5

20.0

12.5

5.5

5.0

5.0

5.5

5.0

5.0

13.0

4.0

4.0

10.5

13.5 t

4.0

5.0

4.5

6.0

12. 0

12.5

16.5

SUMMARIZED

sand thickness (ft.)

3.0

9.0

2.5

3.0

5.5

6.0

5.0

11.0

1.5

4.0

2.5

4.0

1.0

1.0

(^5

6.0

8.0

0.5

6.0

1.5

6.0

5.5 *

BOREHOLE

TABLE NO. 1

STRATIGRAPHY

clay refusal Remarks thickness depth (ft.) (ft.)

No

2.0

Yes

Yes

No

No

NO

No

NO

4.5

14.5

5.0

1.0

25.0

18.0

3.0

4.0

NO

No

6.0

10.5

18.0

8

16 Dynamic Cone Penetration

49.5 Dynamic Cone Penetration

11.0

11.0 -

10.0

16.5 2 Bulk Samples Obtained

6.5

13.5

30.0

13.0

6.0

36.5

32.5

13.0

17.0

5.0

12.0

19.5

29.0

^40.0

1 5*^5*1-

Site LocatlonPiQDScale : lin* " 1/4 mile

0 - radio tower m-remnant mill

— -TVans-Canada highway - other roads o—1

o*5" •o2O

24-5'

mor-

Borehole Location PlanWith B of Tom Contours

Scale: lin- - 50ft- Contour Intervaf - 5 ft*

TAILINGSQNTOUR

Scale : (in.* 5Ofl. Contour interval * l ft.

i Boreholeo•^a

mar-1979

pm

OJ

: ,C

PRO

JECT*

R 7

91

0 9

D

WG

. No.

4

GR

AIN

S

IZE

D

IST

RIB

UT

ION

OoUL)z<cc oU

J

oc•o0)

Ql

Z

Olu.(O

(O

(D52Q

O

O

LUlOQ

)52U

l

u

Percen

t fin

er than

00

i-N

M toe! Cent?

TT-access route.'BAD VERMILION 1.AKE l gi :

approximate J4889 tailings area

Site Location Planpeal* : lin* - 1/4 mile

0 - radio tower m m *remnant mill

—— 'Trans-Canada highway . other roads

'

approximate tailings area

Site Location PlanScale : lin* - 1/4 mile

0 - radio tower m-remnant mill

-Trans-Canada highway - other roads

20 -N| O)O O)

o-to

TAILINGS THICKNESS CONTOUR MAPScale : tin.* 5Oft. Contour interval - l ft.

9 Borehole

. 4-*-. .

33 -J W

O U5

o-^ o

O*

OJ

O", radio tower 4"

point of land 24-5*

remnant mill

Borehole Location PlanWith Bottom Contours

Scale: Mn-- 5O ft- Contour interval - 5 f t-

Notes* l- TBM chipped out on top of bedrock outcrop as shown-assumed el-IOO-OOm-(328-| ft)

2- average ice surface el-98-94m-(324-6ft)

3- dimensions of bus, shack and remnant mitt are no,t accurate

a 5"

o ro

Ministry of Nat

GEOPHYSICAL - GEOIXX TECHNICAL DA' 2.3829 L ITTLE TURTLE LAKE

900

TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORTFACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT

TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC.

Type of Survey(s). Township or Area. Claim Holder(s)—

M A (j N E T l L

fc., Mi h f

Survey Company. Author of Report.

_

5 T A ̂ .J: St~" T f

Address of Author.Covering Dates of Survey.

Total Miles of Line Cu^

ptb tlly(lirfec

2 /

S?'ecutting to office)iting

SPECIAL PROVISIONS CREDITS REQUESTED

ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey.ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.

,, , . ,Geophysical—Electromagnetic—Magnetometer—Radiometric—Other ̂ -^—-,-

DAYS per claim

Geological.Geochemical.

AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision credits do not apply to airborne lurveyi)

Magnetometer. .Electromagnetic. . Radiometric

HATF,

(enter days per claim)

SIGNATURE:.Author of Report "or Agent

Res. Geol.. ifications V-.*'| rv W^t-. QualificationsPrevious Surveys

File No. Type Date Claim Holder

MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically

(prefix) (number)

TOTAL CLAIMS-

GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA

GROUND SURVEYS — If more than one survey, specify data for each type of survey

Number of Stations _________________________Number of Readings -

Station interval ____________________________Line spacing ——-^——

Profile scale ___________________________________________Contour interval.

r. InstrumentP

o

Accuracy — Scale constant. Diurnal correction method.

Base Station check-in interval (hours).

Base Station location and value ———

Instrument

.ECTROMAGNETIToil ronfigiiratinn

fYiil separation

Arrnrary

Method: D Fixed transmitter D Shoot back D In line

Frprmenrv

D Parallel line

Parameters measured.

Instrument,Scale constant

Corrections made.

Base station value and location .

Elevation accuracy-

Instrument .________________^___^^___________^__________Method D Time Domain CD Frequency Domain

Parameters - On time __________________________ Frequency ————

ZO

N

**^

2Q ^ WSp

Electrode spacing . Type of electrode

— Off time ___________________________ Range.

time.

— Integration time.

Power.

Electrode array.

IND

UC

ED

PO

LAR

IZA

TIO

N-

RE

SIS

TIV

ITY

G

RA

VIT

Y

ELE

CT

RO

MA

GN

ET

IC

MA

GN

ET

IC

H

W

2

•o

n n

o S

1~

- O

. Q

.f5

O

^

"

O

"O

o 2.

*

o

OP

i; <

---

?

?

2

3 S

•i -i

rj

(w

o^

S

3^

S

S"i

g

c

5

~S

n.

3

o"O

O

"3

"1

I?

t/s

( _ .

Z-

a;

i D

5- c

o o

H*"~

fr

. 1^

? 3

^

QTQ

^

J3B

SIT.

OS

r- 3

3 c

~.

5"

rs

n

c0

3

3

rtr-

*- 3" o

0

——

--

-

3" S "

a; 3" D^•

3 ^3

s s

!D

,j^c

cn

n

rt

3

3

0

0x:

x; 0 o 1 3

O C S o •^

a? Cft

O V)

r*

V

*-* o' 3 a-- n K 3 CL o"

o K o" 3

otw

^

5? ^S

^-p

p-E

Ts

s- 1

I -i

l 1

? ?

1^8

3

S2

g.S

-3

g3

O32

2 o"^;:^;?

3in

3

S5^

KC

ra

S-

s; —

— w

^ ^

—

1 Q- rj

2rs Cr

t ri D-

•f | ** r* •*i

OT m 5" 3

a T!

x" rt O.

•-t 3 C/J 3. r* 2. a CX

5 3- o o r* SB

O TT- 93* rt a 6

?09 rT 5" rt

I" I "^

P

7

5?

zW

u,S

>=

^ ^

C

E g A

1 8

5 3

? I

s1

1 S"

^^

^ i.

i 1

:. l

s- S

f-

|-

8 f

1 S

"

5 ?

5- i-

E f

S 1

I"

^s*

T

o

x s*

3

^"-

— o

23

5

' 5-

JQ-

S

o

2i

ic

—^

'"T

-

0 c tn

—^

^*\

O *"fc

- ^ i I l̂

^

\v j

4^1

^s- 1

CL ^)

(^ ~T

A ^̂̂ "

"

^t

^ p^L. J

f*^^

^^ *^S o c. 3- "^L jr"

5-'

^'•s.

v^ * i i -a t

o ,̂ O rt ^ A ^ —J

S ^"T"

•C Vnl o •^ 3* A i-^ (/\

f^ -^ *~*.

V" H, ^ ^ a ^ •~x o O

JUX

s**

^^ "

,^^

f~Y\

1 "'

Nw

-Ot

^ C"^

-L ~~^ A. o

4^ 5 ^̂7"^ r^ l 7^-

N^

^ s^ QN,

^s-

^'~w

^•^

1 o r^*-

la /rv*

v.

O

X "^ -- ^*

vV: *i ^^̂ ^

s. v 5" V

i

•^* c C -

^.^^ OQ .A T̂ *^^

^*^

i

^ O* x- c\ y p*

\^r*

O

^

GROUND

SI) I Crt i 3 C n s- a 3 *

ni

i?

2

^ ffi

^ 5

O

(^s;

. r

Q-

nS

o01

JJ

J—

i y

O

^

S'

c S

g

- 2

1

S-

r"0

S

^

MO5

"^

"—

W

1-2

, ^

S '9

5?

P ^

*

1 *3 *5

s. J •v

^, •N ^Q -4.

x^.

^

V

w •^ <

LITTLE TURTLE LAKE-M.2433

920 45 920 30'

46 045'—

(D ^ CVJ

i UJ

en en

48037'30—l

4 l 9509 4 19510 ' 419511i 519103 519106 ! 519107 419512! 412636 l 412637 ! 4126463490 58 34905 9 — -.

K ' K -i - - -O 519008 ' ^'- -~

'——-——•j 5I900I'349065 '349062

K i KK K

349 060 1349061 l 5321 3 5 '

L L' - -532138 ,5321365190O 3'519004

4i831l '475096

532 140! 5321395l9CI25l9009 l 5l900ei5l9005

475141 ,475142 V ermil ion sno. 223

4751205190071519006

5 l 91014 51901 3l

O \ K l K

5190 l 8 ,5I90 l 7 l 475117

519027 ' 475225 l 475226

—-H--—-t--/-H- - -K IK 'K

418444 ,475122 [475228'539X491 475224,

532153/532151 , 4 75 2231 " 7 5 ' 2 3 4 l ft a 4 3 41844,'5 418446

519087 5I9088'5I90895I9090

51909 6 |5I909 5'519092 519091

K "~ "j K ! K i K

519097 1519098 1519093'519094 ' ^.1519041 l 5190391 5(90 38, 5! 90 35

^ j ^ ^. . . J ^, __ __ — |—i __-

! '- " *Shoal Lake

. Wiiaerness Area519045 I5J904415I9043 '5I9Q37•"/T^T preserved,———

(519049 519046 519 O 5 1,519050/5119055 519060 519057 , 519056" ^~" "~

K j Ki

519040 i 519047 [ 5190531519054 ,5l90fiZ 5190 63 5190 58 5190 59

Seme River 5(9079,519076 5 l 9 O 7 5 ' 5190 7 2 | 5190 7 l (5190^5 I5I9064|

K; K : K IK 'K i K i . K i519073519070 51906*15190675/90801919077151907^

L.519074 i 51909

H P t^.33

H D j-^ fch

31H P s~\32 /'

y/"

fj ^

.s

.'- 1 x,.s

J/

-4S 045'

44

43'

42'(D K) CJ

-l

UJ

41'O Q.

Q-l

40

39

:38'

48037'30"

43 42 41 40 39 38' 37' 36' 35' 34 33 32 31'92 0 30'

MELIN L AKE- M .246552C15SEa026 2.3*29 LITTLE TURTLE LAKE 200 486923

AREA OF

BAD VERMILION LAKE

DISTRICT OFRAINY RIVER

KENORA MINING DIVISION

SCALE: 1 -INCH —4O CHAINS

LEGEND

PATENTED LANDCROWN LAND SALELEASESLOCATED LANDLICENSE OF OCCUPATIONMINING RIGHTS ONLYSURFACE RIGHTS ONLYROADSIMPROVED ROADSKING'S HIGHWAYS

RAILWAYSPOWER LINESMARSH OR MUSKEGMINESCANCELLEDPATENTED S.R.O.

c.s.

NOTES

400' surface rights reservation along the shores of all lakes and rivers.

Sand Sk Grovel

M T C Pit No 1 212

"1214MTC Gravel Pil 1 016

Gravel File. 170703

23798

l 7 0756

Gravel Pit No 988

M N R Gravel Reserve No. 239

DATE OF; ISSUE3fP17l979

SURVEYS AND MAPPING

NATIONAL TOPOGRAPHIC SERIES 52 C 10

PLAN NO. 2474ONTARIO

MINISTRY OF NATURAL RESOURCESSURVEYS AND MAPPING BRANCH

HERON LAKE M.240792 045'

480 52'30U —

in*d- CM

LLJ-l

ccLJr-cr oQ.

48 045 l

Jj RAINY LAKE

I.R. N0.26C

4752571475256 W75255K ' " "K" "~ ~k"~

412717 J4I27I8 j 412719

475218 475247^75344 [475245

K' t" K ^ K

M.T.C. ' K \ GRAVEL PIT NO. lO'll S

419508 i 4 12635 | *' 2^385I9I04,5I9I02| 519105 '519108

KBod Vermilion •-5TJJ636 ! 4 I263?

48052'30'

OJ (DroCO

UJ

Q UJ UJ CC

U 48045

43 42 FF FF 37 571 570 92 0 30'

BAD VERMILION LAKE M. 247452CI5SE0026 2.3829 LITTLE TURTLE LAKE 210

487923

AREA OF

2.'3 O^- -" ^

LITTLE TtiRTLE-LAKE

DISTRICT OF RAINY RIVER

KENORA MINING DIVISION

SCALE: MNCH-4O CHAINS

LEGEND

PATENTED LANDCROWN LAND SALE

LEASESLOCATED LANDLICENSE OF OCCUPATIONMINING RIGHTS ONLY

SURFACE RIGHTS ONLYROADSIMPROVED ROADSKING'S HIGHWAYS

RAILWAYSPOWER LINESMARSH OR MUSKEG

MINESPATENTED S.R.O.CANCELLED

or

C.S.

Loc.

LO. M.R.O. S.R.O.

O C,

NOTES

400* Surface Rights Reservation along the shores of alt l akes and rivers.

1/2 eh allowance for Mg. CI. 1770 along the shores of Bad Vermilion Lake - M.R.O.

Areas withdrawn from staking under Section 42 of the Mining Act. Rs.o.i*eo,(Sec.43 t n.s.o.'TO)

Order No. File Date Disposition

',*l)~ PuD.'C Lcncs Act .63472

^2) 11891

W 7/76

W 88/77

67883

35916

7/7/67

19/2/76

.4/11/77

S. R . O

S.R.O

S R O

S R O

SURVEYS AND MAPPING

NATIONAL TOPOGRAPHIC SERIES 52 C 15

PLAN NO. M-2433ONTARIO

MINISTRY OF NATURAL RESOURCESSURVEYS AND MAPPING BRANCH