jbk pipetting_cellometer final poster

1
RESEARCH POSTER PRESENTATION DESIGN © 2012 www.PosterPresentations.com The Problem In brewing, the yeast pitch rate refers to the amount of yeast that is added to cooled wort in millions of cells per milliliter. Repeatable fermentations are not possible without accurate and precise pitch rates, and healthy fermentation is vital to successful re-pitching of yeast for generations. Thus, pitch rate has a large effect on the final flavor and aroma (seen below). Currently, there is no widespread methodology for determining cell counts using new technology, therefore capabilities of these measurement methods are unknown. OBJECTIVE The Goal The goal is to be able to get a repeatable volume of yeast (within 500,000 cells) when pipetting yeast slurry of all thicknesses, using the reverse pipetting method and analyzing cell count on the Cellometer. Why Reverse Pipetting? The reverse pipetting technique is used to pipette solution with high viscosity or a tendency to foam, both which are current problems faced when pipetting yeast slurry. INTRODUCTION How to Reverse Pipette Materials per Person 1 P1000 pipette and 12 wide orifice tips 1 P20 pipette and 24 20uL tips 12 eppendorf tubes and 12 50mL conical tubes w/ caps 12 cellometer slides 1X PBS diluent KimWipes, Eppendorf tubes, and 50ml Centrifuge tubes Analytical balance, stir plate, and vortex Design 5 technicians of varying pipetting experience used the reverse pipetting method to pipette 4 yeast slurries of differing thicknesses in random order 3 different times for each slurry. Yeast slurries were stir plated before trails, and pipettes were cleaned with a KimWipe before dispensing yeast slurry from tip. Procedure 1.Reverse Pipette 1mL (using P1000 pipette with wide tip) of yeast slurry into the pre-weighed diluent (PBS) in a 50ml centrifuge tube without mixing by rinsing tip. Eject tip and remaining yeast slurry. 2.Record weight of added yeast slurry and label this dilution #1. Place tube on vortex for 5-10 seconds for mixing. 3.Reverse Pipette 20uL (using P20 pipette) of dilution #1 into pre-weighed diluent in eppendorf tube. Eject tip and remaining yeast slurry. 4.Label this dilution #2. Place tube on vortex for 5-10 seconds for mixing. 5.Load 20uL (using P20 pipette) of dilution #2 onto Cellometer slide using Reverse Pipetting method. Eject tip and give slide to Lab Supervisor for Cellometer analyzing. The Experiment CONCLUSIONS/RECOMMENDATIONS RESULTS My Experimental Trials Done to gather information to form experiment design and procedure by analyzing % error of average weight recorded during trials. This data shows reverse pipetting of thin and thick yeast slurry to be more accurate and precise at the 1000ul level, but was more precise at 20ul while showing similar % Error (accuracy). Multiple Operator Trials REFERENCES http://www.artel-usa.com/resources-library/in-the-lab-pipetes/ http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3962157/ https://research.aston.ac.uk/portal/files/13572921/Antifoams.pdf http://www.pros.co.nz/PDF/MSDS/Antifoam%20FermCap%20S%20MSDS%2025-04-07.pdf http://www.braukaiser.com/blog/blog/2013/03/25/stir-speed-and-yeast-growth/ http://www.thelabrat.com/protocols/ProperPipettingMethod.shtml http://www.bio.davidson.edu/molecular/protocols/pipette.html http://www.pipettecalibration.net/pipette-calibration-files/guide-to-pipetting-2.pdf https://www.eppendorf.com/uploads/media/USERGUIDE_20_GB_Final.pdf ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This work was supported by New Belgium Brewing Company and the Fermentation Laboratory at Colorado State University. Jeff Callaway Jeff Biegert Katie Fromuth Kimberly Cox-York J. Brendan Kelley Accuracy and Precision of Reverse Pipetting Yeast Slurry to load onto Cellometer Under-pitching effects Excess levels of diacetyl Increase in higher/fusel alcohol formation Increase in ester formation Increase in volatile sulfur compounds High terminal gravities Stuck fermentations Increased risk of infection Over-pitching effects Little to no ester production Quick fermentations Lacking mouthfeel Autolysis of yeast and resulting off-flavors Overall, there is still a considerable amount of noise observed throughout the pipetting process and a method for pipetting a repeatable volume of yeast (within 500,000 cells) when pipetting yeast slurry of all thicknesses using the reverse pipetting method was not achieved. Operator experience and repeatability were found to be the biggest areas of concern, as seen in the Multiple Operator results, though in my experimental trials I found that with enough practice repeatability is achieved. Thus, I recommend that extensive training is implemented to ensure skill and repeatability before an operator is qualified to perform the procedure. It is also recommended that operators are tested monthly to quarterly for technique and quality assurance purposes. 0 20000 40000 60000 80000 Repeatability ParttoPart Reproducibility Measurement System Variance Components 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 12341234123412341234 Part Average Cell Count Part Number (Order from thinnest to thickest = 3, 1, 2, 4) Averages Chart Operator 1 Operator 2 Operator 3 Operator 4 Operator 5 UCL = 1193.942 Center = 806.336 LCL = 418.731 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 12341234123412341234 Part Range Cell Count Part Number (Order from thinnest to thickest = 3, 1, 2, 4) Range Chart Operator 1 Operator 2 Operator 3 Analysis of the variance components of our measurement system displays Operator’s ability to repeat procedure is where error is predominantly coming from. The averages chart supports data revealed above, showing the operators had difficulty repeating the procedure accurately and precisely. The range chart shows the standard deviation of operators. This data displayed Operators 1, 3, and 4 were the most skilled, in terms of standard deviation, while 2 and 5 were not. Data was supported by skill levels Operators listed before experimentation took place. Operator Experience 1 Expert 2 Novice 3 Intermediate 4 Intermediate 5 Novice Thin Slurry (Forward) 1000 uL 1000 uL (wide Rp) 20 uL Average .92419 .917325 .0197 Percent Error 7.581% 8.62675% 1.5% Thick Slurry (Reverse) 1000 uL 1000 uL (wide Rp) 20 uL Average 1.005545 1.012365 .020245 Percent Error .5545% 1.2365% 1.225% Thin Slurry (Reverse) 1000 uL 1000 uL (wide Rp) 20 uL Average .1.0265 1.00741 .0201 Percent Error 2.65% .741% 1.5% Thick Slurry (Forward) 1000 uL 1000 uL (wide Rp) 20 uL Average .954395 .89855 .01981 Percent Error 4.5605% 10.145% .95%

Upload: john-kelley

Post on 15-Apr-2017

29 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: JBK Pipetting_Cellometer Final Poster

RESEARCH POSTER PRESENTATION DESIGN © 2012

www.PosterPresentations.com

(—THIS SIDEBAR DOES NOT PRINT—) DES I G N G U I DE

This PowerPoint 2007 template produces a 36”x48” trifold presentation poster. You can use it to create your research poster and save valuable time placing titles, subtitles, text, and graphics. We provide a series of online tutorials that will guide you through the poster design process and answer your poster production questions. To view our template tutorials, go online to PosterPresentations.com and click on HELP DESK. When you are ready to print your poster, go online to PosterPresentations.com Need assistance? Call us at 1.510.649.3001

QU ICK START

Zoom in and out As you work on your poster zoom in and out to the level that is more comfortable to you. Go to VIEW > ZOOM.

Title, Authors, and Affiliations

Start designing your poster by adding the title, the names of the authors, and the affiliated institutions. You can type or paste text into the provided boxes. The template will automatically adjust the size of your text to fit the title box. You can manually override this feature and change the size of your text. TIP: The font size of your title should be bigger than your name(s) and institution name(s).

Adding Logos / Seals Most often, logos are added on each side of the title. You can insert a logo by dragging and dropping it from your desktop, copy and paste or by going to INSERT > PICTURES. Logos taken from web sites are likely to be low quality when printed. Zoom it at 100% to see what the logo will look like on the final poster and make any necessary adjustments. TIP: See if your school’s logo is available on our free poster templates page.

Photographs / Graphics You can add images by dragging and dropping from your desktop, copy and paste, or by going to INSERT > PICTURES. Resize images proportionally by holding down the SHIFT key and dragging one of the corner handles. For a professional-looking poster, do not distort your images by enlarging them disproportionally.

Image Quality Check Zoom in and look at your images at 100% magnification. If they look good they will print well.

ORIGINAL   DISTORTED  

Corner  handles  

Good

 prin

/ng  qu

ality

 

Bad  prin/n

g  qu

ality

 

QU ICK START ( con t . )

How to change the template color theme You can easily change the color theme of your poster by going to the DESIGN menu, click on COLORS, and choose the color theme of your choice. You can also create your own color theme. You can also manually change the color of your background by going to VIEW > SLIDE MASTER. After you finish working on the master be sure to go to VIEW > NORMAL to continue working on your poster.

How to add Text The template comes with a number of pre-formatted placeholders for headers and text blocks. You can add more blocks by copying and pasting the existing ones or by adding a text box from the HOME menu.

Text size Adjust the size of your text based on how much content you have to present. The default template text offers a good starting point. Follow the conference requirements.

How to add Tables To add a table from scratch go to the INSERT menu and click on TABLE. A drop-down box will help you select rows and columns.

You can also copy and a paste a table from Word or another PowerPoint document. A pasted table may need to be re-formatted by RIGHT-CLICK > FORMAT SHAPE, TEXT BOX, Margins.

Graphs / Charts You can simply copy and paste charts and graphs from Excel or Word. Some reformatting may be required depending on how the original document has been created.

How to change the column configuration RIGHT-CLICK on the poster background and select LAYOUT to see the column options available for this template. The poster columns can also be customized on the Master. VIEW > MASTER.

How to remove the info bars

If you are working in PowerPoint for Windows and have finished your poster, save as PDF and the bars will not be included. You can also delete them by going to VIEW > MASTER. On the Mac adjust the Page-Setup to match the Page-Setup in PowerPoint before you create a PDF. You can also delete them from the Slide Master.

Save your work Save your template as a PowerPoint document. For printing, save as PowerPoint of “Print-quality” PDF.

Print your poster When you are ready to have your poster printed go online to PosterPresentations.com and click on the “Order Your Poster” button. Choose the poster type the best suits your needs and submit your order. If you submit a PowerPoint document you will be receiving a PDF proof for your approval prior to printing. If your order is placed and paid for before noon, Pacific, Monday through Friday, your order will ship out that same day. Next day, Second day, Third day, and Free Ground services are offered. Go to PosterPresentations.com for more information.

Student discounts are available on our Facebook page. Go to PosterPresentations.com and click on the FB icon.

©  2013  PosterPresenta/ons.com          2117  Fourth  Street  ,  Unit  C                            Berkeley  CA  94710          [email protected]  

The Problem In brewing, the yeast pitch rate refers to the

amount of yeast that is added to cooled wort in

millions of cells per milliliter. Repeatable

fermentations are not possible without accurate

and precise pitch rates, and healthy

fermentation is vital to successful re-pitching of

yeast for generations. Thus, pitch rate has a

large effect on the final flavor and aroma (seen

below). Currently, there is no widespread

methodology for determining cell counts using

new technology, therefore capabilities of these

measurement methods are unknown.

OBJECTIVE The Goal

The goal is to be able to get a repeatable

volume of yeast (within 500,000 cells) when

pipetting yeast slurry of all thicknesses, using

the reverse pipetting method and analyzing cell

count on the Cellometer.

Why Reverse Pipetting? The reverse pipetting technique is used to

pipette solution with high viscosity or a tendency

to foam, both which are current problems faced

when pipetting yeast slurry.

INTRODUCTION How to Reverse Pipette

Materials per Person •  1 P1000 pipette and 12 wide orifice tips

•  1 P20 pipette and 24 20uL tips

•  12 eppendorf tubes and 12 50mL conical tubes w/ caps

•  12 cellometer slides

•  1X PBS diluent

•  KimWipes, Eppendorf tubes, and 50ml Centrifuge tubes

•  Analytical balance, stir plate, and vortex

Design 5 technicians of varying pipetting experience used the reverse pipetting method to pipette 4 yeast

slurries of differing thicknesses in random order 3 different times for each slurry. Yeast slurries were stir

plated before trails, and pipettes were cleaned with a KimWipe before dispensing yeast slurry from tip.

Procedure 1. Reverse Pipette 1mL (using P1000 pipette with wide tip) of yeast slurry into the pre-weighed diluent

(PBS) in a 50ml centrifuge tube without mixing by rinsing tip. Eject tip and remaining yeast slurry.

2. Record weight of added yeast slurry and label this dilution #1. Place tube on vortex for 5-10 seconds

for mixing.

3. Reverse Pipette 20uL (using P20 pipette) of dilution #1 into pre-weighed diluent in eppendorf tube.

Eject tip and remaining yeast slurry.

4. Label this dilution #2. Place tube on vortex for 5-10 seconds for mixing.

5. Load 20uL (using P20 pipette) of dilution #2 onto Cellometer slide using Reverse Pipetting method.

Eject tip and give slide to Lab Supervisor for Cellometer analyzing.

The Experiment

CONCLUSIONS/RECOMMENDATIONS

RESULTS My Experimental Trials

•  Done to gather information to form experiment design and procedure by analyzing % error of average weight recorded during trials.

•  This data shows reverse pipetting of thin and thick yeast slurry

to be more accurate and precise at the 1000ul level, but was more precise at 20ul while showing similar % Error (accuracy).

Multiple Operator Trials

REFERENCES •  http://www.artel-usa.com/resources-library/in-the-lab-pipetes/ •  http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3962157/ •  https://research.aston.ac.uk/portal/files/13572921/Antifoams.pdf •  http://www.pros.co.nz/PDF/MSDS/Antifoam%20FermCap%20S%20MSDS%2025-04-07.pdf •  http://www.braukaiser.com/blog/blog/2013/03/25/stir-speed-and-yeast-growth/ •  http://www.thelabrat.com/protocols/ProperPipettingMethod.shtml •  http://www.bio.davidson.edu/molecular/protocols/pipette.html •  http://www.pipettecalibration.net/pipette-calibration-files/guide-to-pipetting-2.pdf •  https://www.eppendorf.com/uploads/media/USERGUIDE_20_GB_Final.pdf

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This work was supported by New Belgium Brewing Company and the Fermentation Laboratory at Colorado State University.

Jeff Callaway Jeff Biegert

Katie Fromuth Kimberly Cox-York J. Brendan Kelley

 

Accuracy and Precision of Reverse Pipetting Yeast Slurry to load onto Cellometer

http://smallworldinitiative.org/colorado-state-university/john-kelley/fort-collins-colorado-near-csu-campus http://www.smccd.edu/accounts/case/graphics/serialdil.gif

https://www.mtholyoke.edu/courses/cwoodard/biol210/GelElectrophoresisFigure.jpg

Pick isolate/isolates with largest zones of inhibition most zones of inhibition produced: Isolate #3 chosen due to number and size of zones of inhibition vs. ESKAPE Relatives.

http://www.chemicool.com/img1/graphics/extractn.gif

Actual Gel Electrophoresis of Isolate #3

Used to differentiate between Gram Positive

bacteria and Gram Negative bacteria based on cell wall.

(Purple = positive, Pink = negative)

Tests for fluorescin production by creating an optimal environment to enhance fluorescin production if the strain

is capable

http://biosistemika.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/real-time-pcr-4.jpg

opu/normal/395.jpg

hKp://www.agrisol.co.nz/assets/worms.jpg ad.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/08/Thermal_hot_spring.jpg

Nucleotide LAST Search

ESKAPE Pathogens - six most antibiotic-resistant emerging pathogens due to their ever-changing pathogenesis, transmission, and resistnce

Bacillus subtillis Stahpylococcus epidermis Escherichia coli Acinetobacter baylyi Enterobacter aerogenes Pseudomonas putida (Enterococcus faecium) (Staphylococcous aureus) (Klebsiella sp.) (Acinetobacter baumannii) (Enterobacter sp.) (Pseudomonas aeruginosa)

Under-pitching effects

•  Excess levels of diacetyl

•  Increase in higher/fusel alcohol formation

•  Increase in ester formation •  Increase in volatile sulfur

compounds •  High terminal gravities

•  Stuck fermentations

•  Increased risk of infection

Over-pitching effects

•  Little to no ester production

•  Quick fermentations •  Lacking mouthfeel •  Autolysis of yeast and

resulting off-flavors

Overall, there is still a considerable amount of noise observed throughout the pipetting process and a method for pipetting a

repeatable volume of yeast (within 500,000 cells) when pipetting yeast slurry of all thicknesses using the reverse

pipetting method was not achieved. Operator experience and repeatability were found to be the biggest areas of concern, as

seen in the Multiple Operator results, though in my experimental trials I found that with enough practice repeatability is achieved.

Thus, I recommend that extensive training is implemented to ensure skill and repeatability before an operator is qualified to perform the procedure. It is also recommended that operators

are tested monthly to quarterly for technique and quality assurance purposes.

0  

20000  

40000  

60000  

80000  

Repeatability  Part-­‐to-­‐Part  

Reproducibility  

Measurement  System  Variance  Components  

0  

200  

400  

600  

800  

1000  

1200  

1400  

1   2   3   4   1   2   3   4   1   2   3   4   1   2   3   4   1   2   3   4  

Part  Average  

Cell  Co

unt  

Part  Number  (Order  from  thinnest  to  thickest  =  3,  1,  2,  4)  

Averages  Chart  

Operator  1  

Operator  2  

Operator  3  

Operator  4  

Operator  5  

UCL  =  1193.942  

Center  =  806.336  

LCL  =  418.731  

0  

200  

400  

600  

800  

1000  

1200  

1400  

1   2   3   4   1   2   3   4   1   2   3   4   1   2   3   4   1   2   3   4  

Part  Ran

ge    

Cell  Co

unt  

Part  Number  (Order  from  thinnest  to  thickest  =  3,  1,  2,  4)  

Range  Chart  

Operator  1  

Operator  2  

Operator  3  

•  Analysis of the variance components of our measurement system displays Operator’s ability to repeat procedure is where error is predominantly coming from.

•  The averages chart supports data revealed above, showing the operators had difficulty repeating the procedure accurately and precisely.

•  The range chart shows the

standard deviation of operators. This data displayed Operators 1, 3, and 4 were the most skilled, in terms of standard deviation, while 2 and 5 were not. Data was supported by skill levels Operators listed before experimentation took place.

Operator Experience

1 Expert

2 Novice

3 Intermediate

4 Intermediate

5 Novice

Thin Slurry (Forward)

1000  uL   1000  uL  (wide  Rp)  

20  uL  

Average   .92419   .917325   .0197  

Percent  Error   -­‐7.581%   -­‐8.62675%   -­‐1.5%  

Thick Slurry (Reverse)

1000  uL   1000  uL  (wide  Rp)  

20  uL  

Average   1.005545   1.012365   .020245  

Percent  Error   .5545%   1.2365%   1.225%  

Thin Slurry (Reverse)

1000  uL   1000  uL  (wide  Rp)  

20  uL  

Average   .1.0265   1.00741   .0201  

Percent  Error   2.65%   .741%   1.5%  

Thick Slurry (Forward)

1000  uL   1000  uL  (wide  Rp)  

20  uL  

Average   .954395   .89855   .01981  

Percent  Error   -­‐4.5605%   -­‐10.145%   -­‐.95%