james (jim) sweeney stanford university director … · 1 behind the meter james (jim) sweeney...

27
1 Behind the Meter James (Jim) Sweeney Stanford University Director Precourt Energy Efficiency Center Professor, Management Science and Engineering

Upload: vuonghuong

Post on 13-Aug-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

1

Behind the Meter

James (Jim) Sweeney

Stanford University

Director

Precourt Energy Efficiency Center

Professor, Management Science and Engineering

2

Some Background on Energy Efficiency

3

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015

Qu

adri

llio

n B

tu

Industrial

Transportation

Residential

Commercial

Consumption Trends Changed In All Sectors of the US Economy After the 1973 Oil Embargo

4

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

20019

50

1955

1960

1965

1970

1975

1980

1985

1990

1995

2000

2005

2010

Qua

drill

ion

Btu

Net Imports: Limited Energy Efficiency

Actual Net Imports

Total Renewable Energy

Nuclear Production

Fossil Production

Total Consumption

Actual Energy Consumption

Additional Net EnergyImports if Limited Energy Efficiency

Actual Net Energy Imports

Limited Energy EfficiencyEnergy Consumption

Energy Efficiency, Domestic Supply, Imports

Data Source: EIA, Monthly Energy Review

5

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

1973 1975 1977 1979 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013

Ind

ex o

f Car

bo

n D

ioxi

de

Per

Do

llar

of R

eal G

DP

(197

3=1

)

Pre 1973 Energy Intensity Trend

Enhanced Energy Efficiency

Carbon Intensity of the Economy

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

1973 1975 1977 1979 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013

Ind

ex o

f Car

bo

n D

ioxi

de

Per

Do

llar

of R

eal G

DP

(197

3=1

)

Pre 1973 Energy Intensity Trend

Enhanced Energy Efficiency

Carbon Intensity of the Economy

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

1973 1975 1977 1979 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013

Ind

ex o

f Car

bo

n D

ioxi

de

Per

Do

llar

of R

eal G

DP

(197

3=1

)

Pre 1973 Energy Intensity Trend

Enhanced Energy Efficiency

Carbon Intensity of the Economy

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

1973 1975 1977 1979 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013

Ind

ex o

f Car

bo

n D

ioxi

de

Per

Do

llar

of R

eal G

DP

(197

3=1

)

Pre 1973 Energy Intensity Trend

Enhanced Energy Efficiency

Decarbonization of Energy Consumption

Carbon Intensity of the Economy

Factors Reducing US Carbon Dioxide Intensity

Instruments: For More Efficient Buildings

7

• Energy Star or LEED rating -- buildings.

Nudges/Disclosure

8

Information

• Performance rating and rating disclosure -- Commercial

building

– Provides incentives for building owners to invest in

energy efficiency. Provides incentives for potential

tenant to demand performance improvement.

9

Instruments: More Efficient Appliances and Equipment

10

Nudges• Energy Star Appliance Labels -- appliances, refrigeration,

equipment, pool pumps …

Information: Energy Labeling

12

Information: Calculators

Federal Equipment Efficiency Standards:

Residentialwww.appliance-standards.org/

Battery Chargers EPACT 2005 None None N/A 2015 2017 CA, OR

Boilers NAECA 1987 2007 2012 Congress 2016 2021

Central Air Conditioners and Heat Pumps NAECA 1987 2011 2015 DOE 2017 2022

Clothes Dryers NAECA 1987 2011 2015 DOE 2017 2021

Compact Audio Equipment None CA, OR, CT

Dehumidifiers EPACT 2005 2007 2012 Congress 2016 2019

Direct Heating Equipment NAECA 1987 2010 2013 DOE 2016 2021

Dishwashers NAECA 1987 2012 2013 DOE 2015 2019

DVD Players and Recorders None CA, OR, CT

External Power Supplies EPACT 2005 2014 2016 DOE 2015 2017 CA

Furnace Fans EPACT 2005 2014 2019 DOE 2020 2025

Furnaces NAECA 1987 2007 2015 DOE 2016 2021

Microwave Ovens NAECA 1987 2013 2016 DOE 2019 2022

Miscellaneous Refrigeration Products None DOE 2016 2019 CAPool Heaters NAECA 1987 2010 2013 DOE 2016 2021

Pool Pumps None AZ, WA, CA, CT

Portable Electric Spas None AZ, OR, WA, CA, CT

Ranges and Ovens NAECA 1987 2009 2012 DOE 2015 2018

Refrigerators and Freezers NAECA 1987 2011 2014 DOE 2018 2021

Room Air Conditioners NAECA 1987 2011 2014 DOE 2017 2020

Set-top Boxes None N/A

Televisions NAECA 1987 None None N/A None None CA, CT, OR

Water Heaters NAECA 1987 2010 2015 DOE 2016 2021

Instruments: Operations

15

Information

• Building Information Management systems

– Allow managers of commercial building to understand

and control their energy use

Building Intelligent Solutions

Big Data for Energy Efficient Management

Courtesy of Microsoft

17

Nudges

• Electricity Use Comparison with Other Homes; approval or

disapproval symbols (e.g. smiles, frowns), motivate people

to use less electricity (e.g. Opower or Tendril)

18

Home Energy Reports and Dashboards(Tendril)

19

Smart Meters (Not just to not hire meter readers)

• Energy use disaggregation

• Segmentation of customers for Demand Side

Management (DSM)

• Linked to games

• Feedback potential

20

Energy Disaggregation

Disaggregation allows us to take a whole building

(aggregate) energy signal, and separate it into appliance

specific data (i.e., plug or end use data). A set of statistical

approaches are applied to accomplish this.

Demand Side Management

(event-based DSM)(intervention DSM)

baseline

From Ram Rajagopal and team

Smart Meters and Analytics to Guide

Program Targeting

22Work by Ram Rajagopal and team

customers

Sense

DATA:Smart meter

WeatherSubsample survey

Learn

Feature extraction

Segmentation

Profiling

Predict

Response modelling

Match

M & V results

Targeting

Program matching

M & V

Analytics & Optimisation

Feedback to customers

23

24

Feedback: Controlled Experiment with Google Powermeter

25

Learning Thermostats: Nest

26

Pricing Strategies

• Tiered Pricing

– Theory: consumers respond to the marginal price

– Empirical evidence: consumers respond to the size of

their bill, but not to the marginal price (Ito)

• Time varying pricing

– Time of use: consumers can adjust their habitual

activities to adjust to different pricing. Example –

charging of electric vehicles

– Critical peak pricing: Alerts to consumers so they can

adjust next day’s activities

– Real time pricing: Too data intense for non-automated

responses. But with information, automatic control,

possibly can create responses.

In this election season, you may enjoy:

“The Great Energy Debate”

UTube Video: at http://peec.stanford.edu