james a. kingsbury may 11, 2006 san jose, california

17
Quality of Surface and Finished Water of Community Water Systems -- Preliminary Results United States Department of Interior James A. Kingsbury May 11, 2006 San Jose, California

Upload: mauve

Post on 27-Jan-2016

24 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

United States Department of Interior. Quality of Surface and Finished Water of Community Water Systems -- Preliminary Results. James A. Kingsbury May 11, 2006 San Jose, California. Focus of Today’s Talk. Source Water-Quality Assessment (SWQA) Design - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: James A. Kingsbury May 11, 2006 San Jose, California

Quality of Surface and Finished Water of Community Water Systems

--Preliminary Results

United States Department of Interior

James A. KingsburyMay 11, 2006

San Jose, California

Page 2: James A. Kingsbury May 11, 2006 San Jose, California

Focus of Today’s Talk

• Source Water-Quality Assessment Source Water-Quality Assessment (SWQA) Design(SWQA) Design

• Occurrence of Compounds in Source Occurrence of Compounds in Source WaterWater

• Source- and Finished-Water Quality and Source- and Finished-Water Quality and comparison to Human-Health Benchmarkscomparison to Human-Health Benchmarks

Page 3: James A. Kingsbury May 11, 2006 San Jose, California

SWQA Design

• Phase 1: Samples from 9 intakes analyzed for 260 organic compounds

• Phase 2: Source- and finished-

water samples at 8 sites

analyzed for selected

compounds.

• Monthly samples and during

selected flow conditions

during both phases

Page 4: James A. Kingsbury May 11, 2006 San Jose, California

SWQA Study Areas• 9 streams/rivers—single intake

• Average Annual Water Use2 sites > 150 MGD3 sites 20-70 MGD4 sites < 10 MGD

• Water Treatment7 sites use PAC or GAC1 ozone disinfection

• Land UseMixed and undeveloped

Page 5: James A. Kingsbury May 11, 2006 San Jose, California

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

Number of Compounds

Number in group

Number with

human-health

benchmarks

and degradatesGasoline hydrocarbons, oxygenates,

Personal Care and Domestic Use

Solvents

Insecticides and degradates

Herbicides and degradates

Pavement- and Combustion-Derived

Disinfection By-products

Fungicides

Plant- or Animal-Derived Biochemicals

Refrigerants and Propellants

Fumigant Related Compounds

Organic Synthesis Compounds

Manufacturing Additives

Samples were analyzed for:

Page 6: James A. Kingsbury May 11, 2006 San Jose, California

• Of the 260 compounds analyzed, about 120 were not detected in any samples

• Nine compounds were detected in more than half of samples collected

Occurrence of Compounds in Source Water

Page 7: James A. Kingsbury May 11, 2006 San Jose, California

Compounds Detected in Source WaterCompounds Detected in Source Water

Emerging Contaminants

AtrazineAHTN

CaffeineChloroform

DeethylatrazineMetolachlorPrometonSimazine

2,4-D2-Hydroxyatrazine

AHTNCaffeineHHBC

Ethyl citrate4-Nonylphenol diethoxylateTri(2-chloroethyl) phosphate

Tris(dichlorisopropyl) phosphateTributyl phosphate

Triphenyl phosphateCholesterol

42-70% of samples 14-54% of samples

Most Frequently Detected

Page 8: James A. Kingsbury May 11, 2006 San Jose, California

Average Concentrations of Frequently Detected Compounds are Low

Note: Different symbol for each site

Atrazine

Chloroform

Deethylatrazine

2-Hydroxyatrazine

Simazine

Prometon

Metolachlor

2,4-D

Concentration, in ug/L

0.001 0.01 0.1 1

Page 9: James A. Kingsbury May 11, 2006 San Jose, California

Average Concentrations of Emerging Contaminants in Source Water are Low

Note: Different symbol for each site

Concentration, in ug/L

0.001 0.01 0.1 1

Caffeine

AHTN

HHBC

Tri(2-chloroethyl)phosphate

Tris(dichlorisopropyl)phosphate

Tributyl phosphate

Page 10: James A. Kingsbury May 11, 2006 San Jose, California

MCLs—Regulated Compounds

Health-Based Screening Levels(HBSLs)—Unregulated Compounds

Source- and Finished-Water Quality and Comparison to Human-Health

Benchmarks

Page 11: James A. Kingsbury May 11, 2006 San Jose, California

Compounds Frequently Detected in Source Water Also Present in Finished Water

0 20 40 60 80 100

Atrazine

Deethylatrazine

2-Hydroxytrazine

Simazine

Prometon

2,4-D

Metolachlor

Detection Frequency, in Percent Source water Finished water

N~90

Page 12: James A. Kingsbury May 11, 2006 San Jose, California

Concentrations of Some Compounds are Similar for Source and Finished Water

Page 13: James A. Kingsbury May 11, 2006 San Jose, California

Emerging Contaminants Detected in Source Water also Present in Finished Water

N~90

0 20 40 60

Detection Frequency, in Percent

Source water Finished water

AHTN

HHBC

4-nonylphenol diethoxylate

Tributyl phosphate

Ethyl citrate

Tri(2-chlorethyl) phosphate

Cholesterol

Tris(dichlorisopropyl)phosphate

Triphenyl phosphate

Caffeine

Page 14: James A. Kingsbury May 11, 2006 San Jose, California

0.001 0.01 0.1 1 100.001 0.01 0.1 1 100.001

0.01

0.1

1

10

Concentration in Source Water, in ug/L

Co

nce

ntr

atio

n in

Fin

ish

ed

W

ate

r, in

ug

/L

AHTN Cholesterol

Concentrations of Some Emerging Contaminants are Similar for Source

and Finished Water

Page 15: James A. Kingsbury May 11, 2006 San Jose, California

Average Concentrations of Frequently Detected Compounds are Below Human-

Health Benchmarks

Source waterFinished water

2-Hydroxyatrazine

Metolachlor

Prometon

Deethylatrazine

Concentration, in ug/L

MCLs

HBSLs

No MCLor HBSL

Atrazine

Simazine

2,4-D

0.01 0.1 1 10 100

Page 16: James A. Kingsbury May 11, 2006 San Jose, California

Conclusions

• Almost half of the compounds analyzed were not detected in source water

• Many compounds present in source water were detected in finished water

• Average concentrations were below human-health benchmarks

Page 17: James A. Kingsbury May 11, 2006 San Jose, California

For More Information About

NAWQA - reports, data, and programs

http://water.usgs.gov/nawqa

SWQA- Greg Delzer, Coordinator

email: [email protected]

Phone (605) 394-3230