jack smith - list of quotes

8/8/2019 Jack Smith - List of Quotes

1/43

LIST OF QUOTES FROM JACK SMITH AND OTHERS

MOSTLY FROM AMERICAN SOURCES

Kindly shared by courtesy of Pierino from Adelaide expressly for your learning. Gods speed.

No specific order Numbering has started recently. Note coloured content tabs on right hand margin.

1 QUOTES[001]"The Public are told FAIRY STORIES. Every generation is told a MYTH and it's called "HISTORY". -Alan Watt"Wars are very expensive. Wars take many many years of planning BEFORE they actually take place -NOTHING is ever spontaneous" - Alan WattThis is, NOTHING NEW UNDER THE SUN and the real facts of the day is that NOTHING happensby chance!

2 TURNING THE OTHER CHEEK[002] COURTThis information is in relation to what we have been "indoctrinated" with and that is that we have been

taught to "DEFEND" ourselves INSTEAD of"turning the other cheek".. Our "educators" understoodVERY well why they taught us and wanted us to DEFEND ourselves, for the reasons stated below!"It is the DEFENDING that CREATES the POWER. It's the "DEFENCE" which creates the FORCE.If you go in there (into court) withNO DEFENCE, there isNO FORCE. ACCEPTANCE IS THE"KEY". They're NOT used to "Acceptance" they're used to "Defence". The reason that they (the court)don't want anything to do with this is because then they DON'T HAVE THE POWER!" - Sam Davis

3 PRIVATE CONTRACT FOR PUBLIC ACCEPTANCE[003]

CONTRACTThere is NOTHING Judicial even if you think youre in a judicial proceeding in the court, there is NOJudicial procedure. All theyre trying to do is WRITE A CONTRACT and if you dont OFFERaPRIVATE CONTRACT (Your Administrative process) for Public Acceptance theyll substitute aPUBLIC OFFERING (allegations/ assumptions & presumptions) for private acceptance, which isgenerally what gets everyone in prison (By Agreement) because 99.9% of people in prison are there oftheir own FREE WILL,, they volunteered, when they ACCEPTED the PUBLIC CONTRACT anddidnt offer a PRIVATE CONTRACT forPUBLIC ACCEPTANCE. Jack Smith.

4 OFFER YOUR PRIVATE CONTRACT [004]

CONTRACTThere is NO Law in their system and so EVERYTHING is a CONTRACT. The question is whetherthe public is going to make the OFFERING and youre going to PRIVATELY ACCEPT it so thats the

contract before the Tribunal or whether youre going to propose a PRIVATE CONTRACT and getthe public to ACCEPT your PRIVATE CONTRACT because your private contract allows SETOFFand CLOSURE of the case. The public OFFERING that they give to you does NOT allow SETOFF,youve got to pay the penalty and that penalty is going to be extracted from you to do a discharge andso would you rather discharge it and be penalized by PUBLIC POLICY or would you rather use thePRE-PAID account by giving YOUR PRIVATE OFFERING and get the PUBLIC to accept it forSETOFF? Jack Smith.John, P - Read this paragraph VERY carefully and then read it AGAIN and then read it AGAIN. Whatis contained herein could actually give you the ANSWER to your SETOFF solution. Your private

KLINGON LIST OF QUOTES from various contributors Page 1 of 43


2/43

paperwork, that includes EVERYTHING, can used as your "Private contract offering" for your

SETOFF! - Think about it!

5 NO COMMERCE IN HEAVEN [005]HEAVEN IS A COMMERCIAL FREE ZONE! - Jack Smith.

6 THAT YOU SHALL DO [006] CONTRACTPROPERTY RIGHTS many times are NOT affected solely by laws and statutes passed by legislature, that theMAJORITY of the times, property rights are AFFECTED BY CONTRACT rather than public statutes orlegislation and I am trying to get the patriots, to see the possibility that PRIVATE CONTRACT is what isCREATING THE NEXUS between the IRS and the UNITED STATES (INC) and between these patriots that areclaiming there is NO law.Jack Smith.

So if you CONTRACTED you have got a FIDUCIARY DUTY, in fact SCRIPTURE saysEverything that you have set your hand to do sign on the dotted line and made a contract,THAT YOU SHALL DO! Jack Smith.

7 ALTERED BY CONTRACTS [007] CONTRACTThe point is that ALL OF YOUR PROPERTY RIGHTS, and a property right includes ANY of yourUNALIENABLE RIGHTS under a NATURAL (Creators) LAW are ALTERED and AMENDED byYOUR CONTRACTS that YOU make. Jack Smith."All rights MUST be reserved!" when signing ANY contract!"

8 REBUT THE PRESUMPTIONS[008] COURTNow rather than show up at a hearing and TESTIFY, what hes got to do is he has to bring EVIDENCE and aPETITION IN SUPPORT thereof to REBUT THE PRESUMPTION that there still is an outstanding obligationwhich has not been settled and closed. So what you need is EVIDENCE to REBUT the PRESUMPTION that thereis a need for a DEBTORS EXAM and the way to do that is PRESENT THE EVIDENCE from the PRIVATESECTOR that the matter is SETTLED AND CLOSED.Jack Smith.

Place your PRIVATE evidence (Not for public filing/disclosure) into the private evidence file of

the court.

8a REVISED QUOTE[008A] COURTNow rather than show up at a hearing and TESTIFY, what YOU have got to do is you have to bring EVIDENCEand a PETITION IN SUPPORT thereof to REBUT THE PRESUMPTION that there still is an outstandingobligation which has not been settled and closed. So what you need is EVIDENCE to REBUT thePRESUMPTION that there is a need for a DEBTORS EXAM and the way to do that is PRESENT THEEVIDENCE from the PRIVATE SECTOR that the matter is SETTLED AND CLOSED.So consequentlyYOUhave got to get the evidence into an EVIDENCE FOLDER, under that case number, and NOT into the GENERALCOURT FOLDER as though its being submitted as a PUBLIC document that is brought with public pleadings

and is ARGUED on the public side of the court case. The EVIDENCE FOLDER is the PRIVATE side of the caseJack Smith.

9 END GAME "LEGAL THEORY'- [009] CONTRACTThe GUILTY theory is based on the LEGAL THEORY of CONTRACT LAW! You had/have a DUTY toREBUT the PRESUMPTION OF EVIDENCE. You FAILED to rebut it so obviously there is NO REBUTTALso you are AGREEING youre guilty. We dont need evidence as long as we have got your CONSENT,agreement or contract. So you are found guilty BASED ON CONTRACT LAW. There is NO statute law, therewas no evidence, you are found guilty based on CONTRACT LAW which in Admiralty/Maritime is good



3/43

enough. It amounts to a CONFESSION in open court because YOU HAVE CONTRACTED THAT YOUREGUILTY. The reason you have contracted that youre guilty is because everybody in criminal law 101understands that in Admiralty youre GUILTY unless YOU PROVE that your innocent and everybody furtherunderstands that ALLEGATIONS by the prosecution or plaintiff in Admiralty, DO NOT have to be supportedby Affidavit or ANY evidence whatsoever.- Jack Smith.

10 UNALIENABLE RIGHTS [010] TAX THEFTOne of the reasons why of course the Christian religion has been made fun of, intimidated and itspower has been eroded in our schools and our churches is BECAUSE it speaks to UNALIENABLERIGHTS. Well people who can basically LIE, for their living, living off the money ofTAXPAYERS, knowing what they are participating in a global scam in order that they might [1] Getrid of the people who might go against them and [2] to continue their absolutely insane wealth which isbased on THEFT, on TAX THEFT, its based on Federal Reserve theft, its based on CENTRALBANKING THEFT. Nancy Levant11 DNA PROFILING.1 [011]

CONTROLWhat is PROFILING for especially when they (govt) are collecting DNA? PROFILING is really about

CONTROL. It is about IDENTIFYING who they believe are the COMPLIANT Global citizens. And who

are they concerned about as people who may RESIST. The other possibility of this and it is HIGHLY

suspect when they are collecting DNA. I believe that the top PRIORITY and mission of the one world

government movement is MASSIVE DEPOPULATION. It is the SCAM behind the environmentalist

movement. It is the SCAM behind global warming. They want to reduce the population by massive,

massive numbers. Nancy Levant

11A DNA PROFILING .2 [011]

CONTROLWhen our DNA is now required to be Data Based, we realized that NOT ONLY are we PROFILED as

Social Creatures, our educational levels, our health, our religions, our financial situations, our political

affiliations, we are now also PROFILED and DATABASED and stored basically to the molecular level.Now whats that all about? WHAT IS PROFILING? From Infancy to eldership, every single thing that

we have done financially, politically, medically, socially and now our DNA now you have to make the

assumption that all of this Data Collection and storing of this information that there is an END, a purpose.

Why are they doing this? Its not just because they can. There are missions; there are intentions BEHIND

the profiling of the people of the world. Nancy Levant

12 YOUR RIGHTS [012] COURT'Your rights can NOT be claimed by your Lawyer or Solicitor. Your rights can ONLY be claimed byYOU, the belligerent claimant in person" - George Gordon

13 LIBERTIES AND FREEDOMS GONE [013]INSURANCEIf you want to know where your LIBERTIES and FREEDOMS have gone, they have gone to the InsuranceIndustry, called LIMITED LIABILITY. George Gordon

14 QUOTE [014] HONOUR"To Educate the mind without purifying the heart is but to place a sharp sword in the hands of amadman" - Anonymous



4/43

15 HE'S MY BROTHER! - [015] DEBTS"The Messiah already paid the Full penalty for my sins and I have ACCEPTED his provisions. TheLaw is thus FULLY satisfied for my debts have been paid. Is this court here to collect something inorder to balance the accounts to set my debts straight? My Brother the Messiah, came in and paid them.Do we have any further business here or may I now leave?"So Toady the Sojourners and Strangers that are waxed rich are the "living Souls". How come they're

waxed rich? All their debts have been paid since 1933 under HJR-192 by the Bankers.[ I am strong,strong enough to care! He's my Brother!]So we are rich, rich BEYOND BELIEF. He has NOCONCEPT that he (Man) has been given a BLESSING BEYOND anything that money could EVERbuy. You DON'T need money!To obtain Grace, the sinner must answer in such a way as this;Your Honour, I admit that I am a sinner. I am guilty as charged. I confess that you are just in all yourways and you may sentence me to death, however(Here comes the Defence This is theacceptance of the facts and the additional information, Confess all the facts as true and thengive them additional facts for avoidance which gets you from EXECUTION into GRACE.] Sothe confession is Yep everything that you have charged me with is true. Heres the AVOIDANCE.The Messiah already paid the FULL PENALTY for my sins and I have accepted his provision. The

law is thus full satisfied for my debts have been paid. Is this court here to collect something in order tobalance the accounts in order to set my debts straight? My Brother came in and paid them. Do we haveany further business here now or may I now leave.The Judge will answer; Let the record show that this mans sins have already been paid in fulltherefore this court EXTENDS grace to him and releases him. He is no longer under the law, but

in Grace. Go and Sin no more! (Now thats a very simple concept!) JACK SMITH

16 PLEA BARGAIN AGREEMENTS [016] CONTRACTIn almost all criminal cases, the majority of criminal cases are SETTLED by a PLEA BARGAINAGREEMENT. A Plea Bargain agreement is nothing more than a CONTRACTbetween theprosecution and the defence. The plea bargain agreement then becomes the CONTRACT which

becomes usually at the majority of the times, the JUDGEMENT of the court by the AGREEMENT OFTHE PARTIES and then the execution is then based on that contract and it has NOTHING to do withIN-LAW whatsoever. It hasNOTHING to do with REALITY or the FACTS other than the fact thatthe parties have gotten together and AGREED BY CONTRACT that will allow the magistrate of thecourt to recognize an AGREEMENT and then execute on it. This pleas bargain can be proposed bythe PRIVATE party or the PUBLIC i.e. the prosecution and the party that PROPOSES is the party thatis in CONTROL.Jack Smith.

17 THE COURT SYSTEM [017] COURTPrior to 1933 when men and women were presumed under the protections of the NATURAL-LAW by PUBLICLAW then in the courts, the SUBSTANCE and the FACTS were ALL relevant and TRUTH by way of Affidavits

and other forms of evidence where the proper procedure were used in order to invoke a proper outcome from thecourts.

Post 1933 we have NO PUBLIC LAW RECOGNIZING UNALIENABLE RIGHTS for men and women. In factthere are no unalienable rights for ANY participants in the court system, because the court system ONLY has asparticipants, TITLES OF NOBIILTY and FICTIONS. Titles of Nobility and FICTIONS do NOT have unalienablerights so the court system does NOT have to grant unalienable rights to anyone thats a participant in the courtsystem. Jack Smith.

18 CONTRACTUAL CONSENT [018] CONTRACTKLINGON LIST OF QUOTES from various contributors Page 4 of 43


5/43

The courts are run on COMMERCIAL CONTRACT LAW and that is has NOTHING to do with any IN-LAWprocedures whatsoever. So the nature of the game is to OBTAIN a CONTRACT with yourOPPONENT(Adversary) so that the court can acknowledge and RATIFY the contract and SETTLE and CLOSE the case andmove on and if you understand that EVERYTHING in there is happening by way ofCONTRACTS instead oftrying to get the truth out then MAYBE youll get the truth to prevail by following the CORRECT procedure toget them to acknowledge the truth by CONTRACTUAL CONSENT.Jack Smith.

19 BOTH JURISDICTIONAL VENUES [019] CONTRACTNow the New Testament said thatYOU are to go to your brother to reach a SETTLEMENT and if he will NOTreach a settlement, then you GO WITH A WITNESS. Well when you go to your brother youre doing yourPRIVATE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS by way ofLETTER ROGATORY and requests, Affidavits ofNEGATIVE AVERMENT and other forms ofTHIRD PARTY EVIDENCE that is brought into the proceedings.Most likely your brother will NOT answer you and in this case your brother is the administrative agency orwhatever it is that youre dealing with. If he does NOT answer you, you go to step 2, you take a WITNESS beingthe PUBLIC NOTARY. Why is he the witness? BECAUSE HE CAN BE SEEN BY BOTH JURISDICTIONALVENUES! He has a SEAL which is recognized in THEIR system and he has also been authorized in his capacityas a Notary to take sworn testimony and other evidence UNDER SEALas an EVIDENTIARY RECORD for theagency to review for acceptance and acknowledgement. Jack Smith.

20 YOU PROPOSE THE CONTRACT[020] CONTRACTNow the way that you get yourREMEDY then isYOU PROPOSE the CONTRACT to your opponent by theseADMINISTRATIVE PRIVATE PROCEDURES in which you are dealing with SUBSTANCE of a matter withACTUAL evidence and youre dealing with the FORM of the matter in Admiralty/Maritime and NOT thecommon law because Admiralty/Maritime is the proper administrative procedures for resolving these issues untilyou EXHAUST your administrative remedy, you have NO CAPACITY for any judicial review of any kindwhatsoever. Now the ADMINSTRATIVE REMEDIES are actually CARRIED OUT IN PRIVATE,private letternegotiations back and forth between the parties. Jack Smith

21 YOU SET JURISDICTION & VENUE[021] COURTSo government agencies MOST of the time carry on PRIVATE NEGOTIATIONS in order to ILLICIT ACONTRACT fromYOU PRIOR to going into any public proceedings. All you have to do is MIRROR-IMAGETHAT! If a govt agency writes your strawman a letter, thats a PRIVATE LETTER OFNEGOTIATION forCONTRACT SETTLEMENT, its NOTpublic. In fact their documents which are lodged in their public recordssystem are immune from dissemination TO the public by the PRIVACY ACT and other statutes. If you DONTPROPOSE YOUR private CONTRACT as a measure of last resort the public will PROPOSE a contract toYOU!And the Contract will be purviewed under public policy, which is ENTIRELY different to public Law orUnalienable rights and Natural-Law. THE PARTY PROPOSING THE CONTRACT CAN ACTUALLY SET THEJURISDICTION AND VENUE and the issues raisedJack Smith.

22 DUTIES OF CLERKS [022]- CRITICAL ONE! COURTThe Statutes (In Florida) on the DUTIES OF CLERKS (of the court) CLEARLY stated that the clerk had to have

BOTH a PUBLIC FOLDER or a FILE FOLDER and a EVIDENCE FILE orFOLDER for the case (Public Policyfolder & Private Folder). You must ask a QUESTION to the clerk and NOT make a statement, for example youwould ask the clerk which you ALWAYS DO if you are the creditor,

Are you meaning to tell me/us that you are operating your office in violation of the States Statutes, which

REQUIRE YOU to have an EVIDENCE FILE for each case ALSO?(As well as a Folder)

Now since this is a question,, the party asking this question is coming from a POSITION OF AUTHORITY, notfrom the position ofDUTY. If you PROPOSE it you MUST PROVE IT if you question it, they MUST respond toyou otherwise they are WAIVING certain defenses and rights.Jack Smith.



6/43

We would have to have some similiar "legislation" here in regards to a "Private folder" and/or Privatefolder"

23 COURTS PUBLIC OFFERING [023] CONTRACTSo EVERYTHING going on in the court is CONTRACT LAW and they have a fantastic ability to play these littlegames so that basically you will acknowledge theirPUBLIC OFFERING by PRIVATE ACCEPTANCE through

the games they play with you and you dont know how to negotiateCONTRACTS

and you dont know anydifferent.

THEIR offer in PUBLIC SESSION cannot look at the SUBSTANCE, the REALITY and the TRUTH ofYOUR

RECORD in that PUBLIC session .[Only in the private -"In-Chambers"] Jack Smith.

24 BASED ON A SIGNATURE [024] CONTRACTEverything is done by CONTRACT. It DOESNT matter whether its Civil or Criminal. There is NO LAWanymore because there is NO MONEY (Of substance) and since there is NO LAW and since there is NO MONEYeverything is done by CONTRACT, its AGREEMENT OF THE PARTIES. So remember, that theoreticallyanything that is done COMMERCIALLY in the CIVIL WORLD by any kind of accounts, its BASED ON ASIGNATURE.Jack Smith.

25 THE ALTER-EGO - YOUR SHADOW [025] LEGAL ENTITIESThe guy who THINKS he is an EMPLOYEE is NOT, its a CORPORATE FICTION, which is the Employee.NO living MAN OR WOMAN went to work in their system. The ALTER-EGO THE SHADOW (Called theEmployee) went to work in their system. So they DO NOT see living men or women and they are notemploying living men and women they are employing CORPORATIONS called EMPLOYEES. Jack Smith.

26 ONE-MAN LEGAL ENTITIES [026] LEGAL ENTITIESThe INCOME TAX act is totally constitutional as it applies to Corporations; its totally UN-Constitutional as it

applies to LIVING men and women because living men and women have UN-A-LIEN-ABLE rights to theirLabour but corporations are operating under a government licence and the Income tax on the receipts ofthe corporation basically is NOT A direct tax like on property, it is a tax on the way of doing business

through the PRIVILEGE of being an incorporated ENTITY.

In other words the government CREATED YOU as a LEGAL ENTITY and the government has a RIGHT to taxits creation in any way shape and form it wants. The government CANNOT tax people because the governmentdid NOT create people, God created people but the government when it creates a corporation can tax its owncorporate entities into oblivion. So therefore NOMAN orWOMAN EVER worked for any corporation in themodern times, all that WORKS for the corporations are ONE-MAN LEGAL ENTITIES, FICTION-STRAWMEN.Jack Smith.

27 PRIVATE OFFER with PUBLIC ACCEPTANCE [027] COURTNo matter what you do its important that you DONT do a General appearance (in court) because once you

do a General AppearanceYOU and the DEFENDANT (fiction) are the SAME and youre in the public areaUNDER the PUBLIC OFFERING.

RememberTHE CHARGE IS A PUBLIC OFFERING and once you APPEAR to answer that public

offering in the public- YOU ARE IN PRIVATE ACCEPTANCE of a PUBLIC CONTRACT and I amTELLING YOU yourONLY REMEDY is to get a PRIVATE OFFER with PUBLIC ACCEPTANCE toget you your remedy.

A Public offer with private acceptance will get you BOAT LOADS of problems because youre UNDER

PUBLIC POLICY. Understand it this way, if you have a PRIVATE OFFERING with PUBLIC ACCEPTANCE



7/43

you will get a PRIVATE EXECUTION. If you have a PUBLIC OFFERING with PRIVATE ACCEPTANCE youare STUCK with a PUBLIC EXECUTION, which youre NOT going to appreciate. Jack Smith.

28 JURY SERVICE [028] OATH"If you DON'T want to serve on THE JURY you have to have a reason why. Now you walk in and theyalways swear you in. Now if you walk in there and say, " I am Hebrew and I practice the law of God

and I cannot take the Oath so I cannot SWEAR that I will accept THE LAW from you Judge"You see to SERVE on a Jury you have to VIOLATE the ten commandments. You can't serve on aJury and practice the ten commandments. So once you AGREE to divorce yourself from the tencommandments and that you will ACCEPT THE LAW that the Judge gives you and that you'll followthe courts instructions ( Jury instructions). The Judge will INSTRUCT you as to how the verdict willcome out, then you can serve on the Jury" -George Gordon."Can I be compelled to violate the HIGHER LAW of the creator in order to take an Oath, whichI am NOT allowed to do as it is in violation of the HIGHER LAW"

29 INCOME TAX [029] TAXATIONWhen it comes to INCOME TAX its not really an income tax so much that its a TRUSTEE FEE based on the

fact that all these CORPORATIONS are Subsets of the government. The government is the FIDUCIARY andbasically the Income Tax is the TRUSTEE FEE for the government regulating the corporations. SinceINCOME TAX is NOT levied on living men and women, there is NO constitutional limitation liability or TortWhatsoever. Taxes are ONLY levied on CORPORATE ENTITIES and to the extent that LIVING PEOPLE gettied up in this mess based on theirIGNORANCE! Jack Smith.

30 YOUR SETOFF REQUEST [030] EXEMPTION A/CIn 1933 by PUBLIC POLICY the government took away LAWFUL MONEY. By taking away Lawful money ittook away the UNALIENABLIE RIGHTS of living men and women to POSSESS TITLE to any goods or propertyof any kind whatsoever.

Since it took away the unalienable right to have Money so that you can SECURE Titles, the government

either created a MASSIVE TORT against all living men and women which is Treason and a violation of

unalienable rights OR else the government gave them a REMEDY that would make them totally whole whichwould NOTprejudice them in anyway shape and form in dealing with property.So the government said, Were going to take away your money so therefore you dont need any money BUTyou can go along with the ILLUSION that exists ,and weve got a PRE-PAID account when we make any kind ofdemands on you, just request through the PROPER parties that they APPLY a setoff, then youre NOT damagedbecause if yourSETOFF is the EQUIVALENT to lawful money so that you get TITLE and CONTROL then youhave NO claim against us we have no Tort against you. So just realize that you are PRE-PAID on EVERYTHINGthat they might demand that you do as long as you go through the proper procedure for requesting the setoff. Jack Smith.

31 THE BEST ANSWER[031] CONTRACTAGREEMENTWhen we get to the SIGNATURE thing, what were going to end up doing is LOOKING IN THE MIRROR andthe clad solution being corded administratively can be the best possible thing going that may be theirCONFESSION. Its one of the BEST indicators we have got. In other words when we really are on top of thething, on the issue or whatever the area may be and all of a sudden THINGS GO SILENT on THEIR SIDE thenthat can be the BEST CONFIRMATION going that we are intellectually and procedurally exactly where weNEEDTO BE. TheirSILENCE can be the BEST ANSWER! Harmon Taylor"Silence is their AGREEMENT!".

32 LAW & IGNORANCE [032] COURT

The law only discriminates against those who are IGNORANT of the law - Lawyer



8/43

"Education is expensive, but IGNORANCE is far more expensive"

33 AUDIT THE SETOFF [033] EXEMPTION A/CSo what did it cost the living man to pay the taxes? SIGNATURE, AUTHORITY, PERMISSION and the taxes

are SETOFFbut the Internal Revenue Services (ATO) was going a RETURN was filed with a voucher (1099form) for setoff so the TRUSTEE FEES are paid and because the returns are filed they are asking us to

AUDIT THE SETOFF on the Mortgage. Can they observe the audit on the Mortgage and approve it. Ifthey ACCEPT the taxes arent they verifying that the Mortgage was paid? So basically what youre doing is

getting a SECOND WITNESS to the commercial transaction and Scripture says if you havent got a

second witness,YOU AINT GOT NOTHING! Jack Smith

34 RELINQUISH YOUR RIGHTS [034] CONTRACTWho here today VALUES property rights the most?

THE ONE WHO HAS CONTROL OVER IT must value the property MORE than anyoneelse because CONTROL is just about everything and who has control of everything? THE STATE!

You people have ALL the unalienable rights to property BUT you gave them up to peoplewho have MORE KNOWLEDGE to whats going on by VOLUNTARY CONTRACT andso YOU AINT GOT THEM NO MORE! Because you can VOLUNTARILYRELINQUISH your rights BY CONTRACT. Jack Smith.

35 AGREEMENT BY CONTRACT [035] CONTRACTThe CONCEPT is though that you have to get an AGREEMENT BY CONTRACT and you KNOW that they areNOT going to respond. So the way that you are going to get your contract is THROUGH the public Notary

through that process of showing an administrative procedure to the proper parties and theirFAILURE to respondand then you are going to have to lodge the final result the evidence of that contract with the PROPERparty With PETITION on the PRIVATE SIDE to get the acknowledgement. Jack Smith.

How do you do these CONTRACTS and stay in CONTROL? You have to understand thePROTOCOLSbecause the protocols are SYMBOLIC of who you are willing to become in therelationship and if you dont understand that the protocols are symbolic of the CONTRACT that youare negotiating and then you can say one thing and then do the opposite by your protocols. Yourprotocols are presumed to be YOUR ACTIONS, they speakLOUDERthan your words and if you are

contravening your own words and so your actions put you in a disadvantage from the contract and intothe public and just like the Judge says, All your unalienable rights are now CONTRACTED AWAYand they are now in the hands of those that VALUE them the most. Who values them the most? Thosethat UNDERSTAND WHAT THEY ARE and how you maintain them. Evidently you didnt learn how tomaintain and negotiate and maintain those rights! Jack Smith.

The problem is that you go to the PUBLIC FOOL SYSTEM and theyre NOT about training you onCONTRACTS on the PRIVATE SIDE, theyre about getting you to ACCEPT PUBLICOFFERINGS so that the schools of the corporations are in CONTROL. Jack Smith.



9/43

36 RESIDENT- INHABITANT [036] * * * * * * TAXATION

The term RESIDE technically moves you off the Land. A RESIDENT in INTERNATIONAL LAW

is a PERSON in a country NOT his own and INHABITANTS are the same thing, its all deceptive.L.B Bork.

37 DE-FACTO CITIZENSHIP [037] CONTRACTThere is NO state citizenship right now. The only citizenship there is right now is DEFACTO. A CITIZENSHIP

is a term that applies to POLITICAL RIGHTS because there are NO governments for us to participate in unlessyou want to be [1] An INSURGENT and you can be part of your state government or Federal, what ever the casemay be or be a REBEL and vote for the Insurgent (Defacto Govt). There is NO state citizenship unless you wantto participate (Vote) in an insurgent system L.B. BorkPlease note, that by "Participation" in "Voting", you are deemed to be in REBELLION to the original,

lawful and dejure jurisdiction and therefore also an "Insurgent" by "force of law". So that you are

compelled to violate the creators law in order to participate in an "ungodly system". I think it's time to

tender your; "NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF CONSENT" - to participate in a system that is in

rebellion to the original and lawful, dejure government/jurisdiction. This is my official notice and

DECREE as it is my right to exercise responsibility.

38 THE ACT OF EMERGENCY [038] CONTROL/LEGAL ENTITIESThis Quote is in regards to the continued state of emergency that we have been under since early last

century.

What they did in their minds was an act of emergency or cause for emergency and really it wasnt it wasactually USURPATION to put this EXTENDED COMMERCIAL SYSTEM in place and pull people into thejurisdiction of the Federal government to have them CONTROLLEDby legislation where the Federalgovernment could NOT CONTROL them before and to give Corporations power. L.B Bork

39 AFFIDAVIT SPEAKS FOR ITSELF [039] COURTI wont stand there ( in court) and argue, I let MY AFFIDAVITS speak for itself and if Itry and ADD TO IT and START TALKING now all of a sudden I am Testifying and I am

NOT interested in Testifying. MY AFFIDAVITS SPEAKS for itself, it is what it is, hasANYBODY COME FORWARD to REBUT my AFFIDAVIT? And THATS where Istay and I am a BROKEN RECORD and I DONT go any further than the Defect (In thecharging instrument being the Plaintiff, who is it? And the Defendant? Who is it?) Sam Davis.Brian, W. - this one is especially for you! Please take note where Sam Davis says that he becomes a

BROKEN RECORD! And does NOT STRAY. when you start "discussing' your case you are now"ADDING TO IT" and are testifying. - This one is a CRITICAL one to understand when proceeding with

a private administrative process and your affidavit in a court or tribunal.

40 REBUTAL TO MY AFFIDAVIT [040] COURT

In reality, and it may APPEAR to you that, theyre (the magistrate/judge) is movingforward and that they DONT care what you say and theyre moving forward and by gollyif you dont come along and PARTICIPATE in this trial (hearing) then youre going to bewashed down the river so to speak. Well that is really NOT THE CASE, they can pretend



10/43

like theyre going on, they can go on, in fact they can hold their entire trial (hearing) and ifthey look at me and want a response from me, I am merely going to ask,IS ANY OF THAT A RESPONSE OR REBUTTAL TO MY AFFIDAVIT?Let them go whereverthey want. Sam DavisJust like Sam Davis says, you must be like a Broken Record and NOT TESTIFY and "add to it"

(Your Affidavit).

41 CHANGE YOUR RELIGION [041] COURTCITIZENSHIP - YOUR NEW RELIGION AND CHURCH.CITIZENSHIP is one of these terms we need to be EXTRAORDINARILY aware of. Its part of the GOTCHAsystem and its part of the language thats convoluted and its one that we need to be FULLY aware of. If weretalking about a U.S Citizen, were NO LONGER talking about a LAW OF THE LAND based system but a veryDIFFERENT thing. It is one more item on the area that we look back on and sit down and now say, oh my Godwhat happened? Its a LOOK ALIKE but its VERY, VERY different Harmon Taylor [Former BarAttorney]

I used to think that a U.S citizen was the right thing to be and have since OPTED OUT ofparticipation IN THAT CHURCH, the CHURCH of the UNITED STATES (Inc), membership ofthe church of the United States is its UNITED STATES citizens and THATS NOT MYCHURCH!Harmon Taylor [Former Bar Attorney]

Citizenship is to be DISTINGUISHED from another concept called NATIONALITY. Nationality isdetermined as a matter of law. There are two theories, one is JUS SOLI which is a NationalityDERIVED from the location of the birth (BERTH), its the ASSOCIATION with a BODYPOLITIC it determined by the location of that body politic at the time that the child was born and thechild has a nationality according to that rule, its a British Rule and we adopted it. The other rule isJUS-SANGUANESS which basically, youre a national of the BLOODLINE or in other words anational of the nationality of your parents. Harmon Taylor [Former Bar Attorney]

Citizenship is a CRITICAL understanding; I equate that with CHURCH MEMBERSHIP.

Why? Because Citizenship is PURELY DISCRETIONARY unilateral voluntary decision.So I can change my RELIGION I can change my citizenship. Harmon Taylor [Former BarAttorney]

42 CHOICE OF LAW [042] COURTFor example in the LAND issue we have got to understand what are the details by which we choosethe wrong law. There are things like TIME, PLACE, CAPACITY, MEDIUM OF EXCHANGE thenPROPERTY DESCRIPTION all of which can indicate that we want all of these transactions and all ofthese PROPERTY INTERESTS to be recognized in the CONSTITUTION FREE MARTIMECOMMERCIAL ZONE. If we DONT understand the differences then that is the path we will be leaddown (The Maritime Commercial Zone in which the constitution does NOT apply.) When we DO

understand that TIME MATTERS and that TIME is evidence ofCHOICE OF LAW. We need tomake sure that that piece of paper [contract] says WHAT WE want it to say BEFORE we sign it. Harmon Taylor [Former Bar Attorney

43 FUNDAMENTAL CHOICES [043] DEBTS/FIATMONEYThe two fundamental choices right is the FUNNY MONEY SYSTEM which exists in the CONSTITUTION FREEMARITIME COMMERCIAL ZONE (Federal Reserve notes) under the law of the land that system is FRAUD onits face. When you choose to use Federal Reserve notes there must be anotherCHOICE OF LAW in which that



11/43

funny money is fully legitimate. When we use these Federal Reserve Notes then if we say NOTHING MOREthen it can be presumed, safely that (YOUR) CHOICE OF LAW is NOT the LAW OF THE LAND but theMARTIME law that goes along with this other Place. So if we want the Law of the Land to be presumed weneed to use an HONEST system of weights and measures. The minute we ESTABLISH the Choice of law theneverything else is different. So evidence of (Your) choice of law you use SILVER and denominate it in termsofTROY OUNCES. Harmon Taylor [Former Bar Attorney]

45 NOTICE OF LIEN [045] DEBT/LEINHere is some very practical and worthwhile knowledge to keep in your notes! - Pierino.Well basically a NOTICE OF LIEN is NOT worth the paper that it is written on. It is a statement that you owethis amount of money. There is NO DUE PROCESS, you havent had your day in court, theres NOJUDGMENTby a court ofCOMPETENT JURISDICTION and so basically its imbalanced. Now if the countyrecorder would take a moment and do theirDUE DILIGENCE and I want to point this out that IGNORANCE ISNO EXCUSE FOR THE LAW and thats where we are holding theirFEET TO THE FIRE and because they havenot done theirDUE DILIGENCE and the document is STAMPED and turns it into a NEGOTIABLE SECURITYthats where theFRAUD BEGINS and its NOT just to the RECORDING of the NOTICE OF LIEN or into the taxLien Index, ITS THE STAMPING, thats what makes the NOTICE OF LIEN a NEGOTIABLE SECURITY.With the county recorder now being the Fiduciary (for that instrument) she is making it something that ITS NOT.

If it was an ACTUAL lien you would have had yourDUE PROCESS and you would have had your Judgement

by a court of competent jurisdiction. It would be SPECIFIC and CONCISE. You would have had your say. Youmust stick to the DUE PROCESS ISSUE. And NOT allow them to pull the smoke and mirrors because this allboils down to DUE PROCESS. You see when this NOTICE OF LIEN is presented to the recorders office it doesNOT contain a SWORN AFFIDAVIT assessment and signed in FRONT of the recorder in front of the NOTARY asbeing TRUE,CORRECT and COMPLETE. THAT IS THE NECESSARY CERTIFICATION therefore its ONLY aNON-Negotiable, non-spendable piece of paper or instrument which means that it CANNOT be used incommerce as MONEY, after maturing unchallenged after 90 days to procure and sell property. You dont have anactual place that you can go and REVIEW the ACTUAL lien and REFUTE it. So they are a FRAUDULENTSECURITYbecause they are COUNTERFEITED into an Evidence of Debt, theyre numbered, theyre recordedand theyre used in COMMERCE to levy.Rae Copitka Lighting the Fires of Liberty

46 ALSO WAGES LEVY [046]DEBT/LEIN

On a WAGES LEVY The same applies, its a SECURITIES FRAUD. The EMPLOYER is committing aSECURITIES FRAUD if they LEVY that they received from the IRS/ATO is NOT PERFECTED. Its has to havea HAND SIGNED AFFIDAVIT being True, correct and complete Signed in front of a NOTARY. Rae Copitka Lighting the Fires of Liberty.

[This information is in addition to item [045] - NOTICE OF LIEN information. Worthwhile and practicalknowledge to keep in your notes. This is when someone is having their wages GARNISHED. If you

understand what they need to present up front under DUE PROCESS OF LAW it will help to empower

you]

47 BIRTH CERTIFICATE UNDERWRITES LOANS [047] EXEMPTION A/C

"KNOWLEDGE WILL FOREVER GOVERN IGNORANCE"- James MadisonDoesnt the SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBERtie into the BIRTH CERTIFICATE? Ok so whenthe BankSETS UP the account for the MORTGAGE LOAN, whats FINANCING (Backing it) it?THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE VALUE! Its NOT created out ofNOTHING. They are using theBirth Certificate and why are they using the Birth Certificate. Well YOU authorized it and they HOLDit and you never did anything to get it back. So theyre using it on the public side with yourPRIVATEAUTHORITY. So YOU created a pure PROMISE TO PAY and they then go, Lets check this guyout and they find, Oh yeah hes part of the TONTINE SYSTEM and hes got a Birth CertificateREGISTERED with us which has VALUE. So we will allow for the bank to give him the VALUEthat hes requesting BASED on the fact that were HOLDING THE VALUE thats in his Birth



12/43


13/43

The STATUTES AT LARGE is the instrument that they use to CREATE PUBLIC VESSELS out ofALL of us.A PUBLIC VESSEL can be better categorized as CHATTEL property. Bill the Freeholder

52 WARD OF THE COURT [052] COURTYou see the minute that you go out and HIRE a Lawyer; you have just waived your right to challenge(Jurisdiction) because the lawyer that you hired is an OFFICER of the court. So the minute that you hired himyou ACQUIESCED to the jurisdiction because hes PART of that jurisdiction. Were all taught from a young ageto go out and hire a lawyer and the minute you do that, you just WAIVED ALL your rights under theconstitution/Common law and you have ACCEPTED the jurisdiction of that court and you CANT stand up andspeak for yourself because you have ALSObecome a WARD OF THE COURT and you have made a statementthat youre a Person ofUNSOUND MIND and thats how you become a ward of the court and the guy takingcare of you , your lawyer becomesYOUR GUARDIAN. Remember that these guys are MAGIC at getting you toacquiesce to the jurisdiction unless you are EXTREMELY knowledgeable in whats going on Bill theFreeholder

52.1 WARD OF THE COURT [052]Cautionary Note To The Below Information In Previous Email [Ward Of The Court - 052]The information described below does NOT mean that one does NOT require assistance of counsel - in

the current admiralty/maritime system, one needs to be "buffered" by legal counsel OTHERWISE yourremedy [private administrative paperwork] gets pushed into the "public" side of the matter and you arethen deemed to be one and the same entity as the Strawman entity named in the presentments and youwill lose your remedy as the Strawman entity has no unlienable rights, only benefits and priveleges.The real issue [for clarification purposes] is that you do NOT get your legal counsel to ARGUE [whichcreates a dishonour] n your behalf and then makes the "law of the case" public policy instead of the"real law".What one needs to do is acquire a legal counsel [preferably by way of your exemption/prepaid account- this can be done through legal services commission in Australia - in America one who is "accused" isAUTOMATICALLY given a lawyer]. Without the assistance of legal counsel one has NOT had whatthe Australian Constitution refers to "the right to a fair trial/hearing" [see Dietrich v The Queen 1992].

Legal Services Commission will TEST YOU on two issues - 1. Your financial position - an "Affidavitof Impercuniosity" [without money] will take care of that issue - here the legal services commission areluring you into "testifying" that you have "income" and "assets" and it is not advisable to proceed onthat basis.2. Legal Services Commission will then look at "the merits of the case" i.e.whether or not you are arguing [which is a dishonour] or whether or not you are "going to peace"[settling and closing the matter honourably by exhausting your private administrative process.] If youare ARGUING , this then gives Legal Services Commission the "discretion" as to whether or not theyprovide you with legal counsel. If you are arguing of course the "law of the case" becomes "publicpolicy" and this is what gives Legal Services Commission the "right" to deny you assistance of legalcounsel.

There may be some toing and froing [drafting and redrafting] which needs to take place before LegalServices Commission finally give up and give you that legal counsel [which is a right under theAustralian Constitution and a right according to the law because without that legal counsel, if you are"the accused", you cannot get a remedy as you cannot then get your evidence [stipulation/agreementobtained through private administrative process into the proceedings i.e. through private in Chambersreview]YOU DO NOT FILE ANYTHING INTO THE PUBLIC.

Once you have finally obtained legal counsel, then you must draft aninstruction letter outlining what it is that you want and do not



14/43

want that legal counsel to do for you eg do NOT argue any of the facts, represent the undersigned onlyon the private side of these matters, the undersigned does NOT wish to argue nor have any other partyargue on behalf of the undersigned etc etc etcOnce you complete your private administrative process you then submit your paperwork to your legalcounsel to have him/her submit that into the private evidence folder [private in chambers ministerialreview] and you write up a one or two page list seeking the orders that you wish that legal counsel to

draw up based upon the outcome of the review of your submitted evidence - be certain to give a copyof that evidence to all other parties concerned and to the judge/magistrate - this locks the legal counselinto a position whereby he/she cannot destroy your remedy.By default a lawyer who is HIRED by way of toilet paper notes [FRNS and RESERVE BANK NOTES- Debt Liability Instruments] will AUTOMATICALLY go to the public side of the issues and placeyou immediately into dishonour if you do not quickly and clearly instruct them on the proper andhonoruable manner in which you wish for them to proceed [that is not to argue of course but to merelysubmit your evidence and draw up the orders sought based upon the outcome of the review of yourprivate administrative paperwork which of course takes place "in chambers" and not in the public!]This is because A LAWYER/ATTORNEY MAKES MORE MONEY IF HE/SHE CAN NOT ONLYCREATE A CONTROVERSY BUT EXTEND THAT CONTROVERSY FOR AS LONG ASPOSSIBLE SUCH AS IS NOW STANDARD PRACTICE IN THE FAMILY COURTS OF THEWORLD.As they say, ignorance of the law is no excuse so if you do not know who you are and do not know thatyou have to instruct your lawyer as your fiduciary to assist you to honourably settle and close thematter WITHOUT ARGUMENTS, then it is true that the legal system is not corrupt per se, but that"my people perish for a lack of knowledge". Regards, Claude Memma

53 DO NOT TRAVERSE TO THEIR ISSUE [053] COURT

When you bring your own issues before the court, THAT is OUTSIDE of the issue being brought against you,as long asYOU DONT TRAVERSE to that (THEIR) issue and you bring your own issues up, now YOURE theplaintiff and your issue has to be decided BEFORE the other issues are. They will try and get you to TRAVERSE( to other issues) all the time. What you have to do is go in and create your own ISSUE. For example that they

charge you forXYZ statutory provisions, but youre NOT going to discuss XYZ statutory provisions. The issue

must be kept with yourRECORDS at all times So you MUST NOT TRAVERSE onto their issue WhereTHEIR MAGIC comes in is that they get you to come in before the court and then the judge starts asking you aBUNCH of questions and then the getsYOU to AGREE TO SOMETHING Bill the Freeholder

54 MISSING NEED TO CHASEUP FROM PIERINO

55 COLOUR OF LAW & MALFEASEANCE [055] COURTOne of the COLOURS OF LAW is the COLOUR OF OFFICE and that refers to an act committed by a PUBLICOFFICIAL under the APPEARANCE of authority but which EXCEEDS AUTHORITY. Its an act committedunderCOLOUR OF OFFICE that is sometimes required to PROVE malfeasance in that office. We have LAW

and then we have Colour of Law which is counterfeit. Thats why we have people like PRIVATEINVESTIGATORS because they can legally act under Colour of law where an official orOFFICER OF THECOURT should NOT, because they do it all the time. Rae Copitka [Lighting the Fires of Liberty]Pleasenote that this demonstrates that there is a difference when the Public officer operates under "Public

policy" (colour of law) as opposed to an "In-chambers" determination made to uphold your private

rights. This lady also can't "see" the two sides of the court so we head back to 'their all corrupt!". This

has been posted to demonstrate what is a good explanation of "colour of law'. - Pierino.

COLOUR OF LAW is acting OUTSIDE of the LAW, using the law or legal authority asYOU CLOAK- Definitionof Colour of Law Rae Copitka[Lighting the Fires of Liberty]



15/43

56 A NAME DEPICTS PROPERTY [056] LEGALENTITYEvery time we INTRODUCE ourselves, you know when they ask you at ALL public meetings, Please stateyour name and Address and we tell them:

WE DONT HAVE A NAME a name depicts OWNERSHIP and were NOT owned by anyone. We are WHO WEARE! And as far as an ADDRESS we dont have one of those either we live in our bodies so thats wherever we

are.

That IMMEDIATELY puts them ON NOTICE that we know our stature, we know our place in Society and it isABOVE those who we are addressing and it is called POLITICALjurisdiction because everything you deal withtoday in Society is the Corporation, you DO have a political status and you have to take on the PERSONALjurisdiction in order to put yourselfABOVE the political because Political is what they GIVE YOU in theCorporation.

You have political, personal and subject matter jurisdiction and you HAVE TO take on the PERSONALjurisdiction in order to put yourselfABOVE the political. The first thing that they ask you in the courts is toplease state your name and address for the records. IF YOU DO, THEYVE GOT YOU! You have ACQUIESCED.So a NAME only applies to PROPERTY and if you want to bePROPERTY, you want to be somebodysproperty, somebodys SLAVE then you can give them your name but otherwise you JUST ARE who you are.

Rae Copitka [Lighting the Fires of Liberty]

57 FRAUD WITH SCIENTER [057] REMEDYHere's a NEW WORD for your Vocabulary and for your paperwork(Not to accuse of course!) folks!The point we want to make here is that WE DONT want to sue them as a governmental entity. You dont winwhen you sue against the government so were looking at HOLDING them PERSONALLY LIABLE and the way

to do that is once you have made a government official AWARE of a crime and they FAIL to act then they arestripped of their governmental immunity and were giving them all the OPPORTUNITY and ALLTHE ROPE thatthey need to hang themselves. Once you NOTIFY them of the FRAUD and they CONTINUE to do it, its called

FRAUD WITH SCIENTERRae Copitka [Lighting the Fires of Liberty]

http://www.answers.com/topic/scienter?cat=biz-fin Scienter

Previous knowledge of operative facts, frequently signifying guilty knowledge. As used in Pleadings, the

term signifies that the alleged crime orTort was done designedly or with guilty knowledge. The term is

usually employed in relation toFraud, and means a person's knowledge that he was making false

representations, with intent to deceive.

The termscienterrefers to a state of mind often required to hold a person legally accountable for her acts.

The term often is used interchangeably with mens rea, which describes criminalintent, butscienterhas a

broader application because it also describes knowledge required to assign liability in many civil cases.

UN NUMBERED BLOOD OF THE MESSIAH DEBTThe Messiah came to planet earth once. He did that to pay the debts of his people to SET THEMFREE, however even though he has PAID the DEBTS. It is interesting that they have not held anaccounting hearing involving Gods people yet. In other words, all of Gods people that have lived inthe past, in the present and in the future, the LAWFUL money of account to SETTLE the debts of SINEXISTS by the BLOOD OF THE MESSIAH and that money is sufficient to SETTLE & CLOSE allaccounts of debt, but there has not been an accounting that has been officially done.

http://www.answers.com/topic/scienter?cat=biz-finhttp://www.answers.com/topic/scienter?cat=biz-finhttp://www.answers.com/topic/torthttp://www.answers.com/topic/torthttp://www.answers.com/topic/fraudhttp://www.answers.com/topic/fraudhttp://www.answers.com/topic/mens-reahttp://www.answers.com/topic/mens-reahttp://www.answers.com/topic/intenthttp://www.answers.com/topic/intenthttp://www.answers.com/topic/liabilityhttp://www.answers.com/topic/scienter?cat=biz-finhttp://www.answers.com/topic/torthttp://www.answers.com/topic/fraudhttp://www.answers.com/topic/mens-reahttp://www.answers.com/topic/intenthttp://www.answers.com/topic/liability


16/43

In Revelation it says there was be a massive ACCOUNTING in front of the throne where everyonecomes at the same time and everyone is going to go one by one in front of the accountant and they aregoing to PLEAD their account as to why is should be SETOFF, settled and closed or whether there hasNOT been a setoff OFFERING to settle the account.Our Body is still a body that is MORTAL because it STILL has the attributes of SIN attached with itgiving it mortality because regardless whether or not we have ACCEPTED the OFFER by our brother

to use his lawful money, his blood, as a setoff to setoff our account and CLOSE it, the accounting hasNOT yet been held and Until the accounting is held and the account is officially closed we CANNOThave an immortal body or a glorified body as the Messiah had AFTER his resurrection from thedead.

BIRTH REGISTRATIONS- THE TRICK! CONTRACTThis is THEIR little trick! You areNOT obliged to REGISTER your children. If you do it is at thatpoint that you are CREATING A LEGAL ENTITY or a PERSON(Fiction). You are ASSOCIATINGthat PERSON with your OFFSPRING, you are abandoning OWNERSHIP orTITLE to that PERSONand the government is SEIZING that under the laws of MARITIME SALVAGE. It becomes THEIRCHATTEL PROPERTY and they use it as THEIR collateral to FLOAT LOANS or to FLOAT

BONDS for LOANS." -Robert-Arthur: Menard "Truth does not have to be believed for it to betrue!"

TESTIMONY COURTTestimony = test the money Claude Memma

The Word MUST CONTRACTI would like to point out the meaning of the word MUST. They will tell you that you MUST apply, youMUST register. They want you to think that you have an OBLIGATION to engage in a certain action. If youhad an obligation, they would use the word OBLIGE. The word MUST is very tricky, it has two senses, one

is an ACTIVE and one is a PASSIVE. If I tell you, You MUST come to my party through the front door Am Icreating an obligation upon you to attend my party? Or am I defining that IF YOU CHOOSE to voluntarilytake them, it will grant me AUTHORITY OVER YOU. Thats THEIRword MUST. It creates NOOBLIGATION, it DEFINES the parameters that will GIVE THEM AUTHORITY and theyve got everyonethinking its an obligation on OURpart and they then point to it and say well you entered into it voluntarily.

The word MUST It doesnt create an Obligation it defines the path, which IF YOU VOLUNTARILY take itwill TRANSFER AUTHORITY to another. Robert: Arthur- Menard

BIRTH REGISTRATIONS CONTRACTSo when a BIRTH is REGISTERED, its NOT the REGISTRATION of the FETUS, its the[REGISTRATION] of an EVENT and the name ENTERED ONTO the form is theNAME OF THEEVENT and it has NOTHING to do with the Fetus, contrary to what you are thinking in your mind.So the name that is ENTERED onto the statement of BIRTH is actually given to the government andthe name that I SPOKE to my child is the one that I gave to my child NOT the name that is on paperto the government Victor-Robert: Beck

APPLICATION - MEANS TO BEG! CONTRACT



17/43

This definition and understanding below is CRITICAL as this is what will apply in our everyday life aswe fill out those dreaded "application" forms for whatever purpose. Keep this little GEM handy. - Allthe best, Pierino.Now THINK about this because if you REALLY want to understand what a word means, DONT justlook up the definition, you have to look at the ASSUMPTIONS it rests upon and the IMPLICATIONSthat is created. APPLICATION means TO BEG! He who begs knows EXACTLY what they are

begging for, they know exactly what theyre giving up for it and they are eitherACKNOWLEDGINGthat the AUTHORITY TO GRANT EXISTS or they are WILLING to create it BYTRANSFERENCE and finally its ALWAYS VOLUNTARY, you are never EVER OBLIGED TOBEG. Robert Arthur Menard

APPLICATION-REGISTRATION-SUBMISSION CONTRACTThese THREE words is how the government has been getting the authority OVERus,REGISTRATION,APPLICATION and SUBMISSION. All of the power that they have over YOUis because you have put YOUR signature on a document with one, two or three of these words. Theword REGISTRATION, what does it mean? Oh I thought I was just putting my name down? Uh, uh,No, historically it goes back hundreds and hundreds of years to an act of a ships Captain, signing

OVERhis ship and all Chattel contents to the harbour master for SAFE KEEPING. Chattel contentsincluded the SLAVES, the condemned, those is DEBT and anything that could be a party to a contract.APPLICATION- means to BEG, to plead, petition, implore and requests. If you want to know whatthis word is going to have on your life, you need to have MORE than just the definition. You need tolook at the ASSUMPTIONS that this definition rests upon and then you need to look at theimplications created by The Assumptions CREATED by BEGGING. He who BEGS, knows exactlywhat he is begging for, they know exactly what theyre t willing to give up for it,they areACKNOWLEDGING the authority to GRANT or if it doesnt exist theyre willing to create it

through transference.

We TRANSFERthat AUTHORITY if that authority doesnt ALREADY exist when we APPLYand finally BECAUSE you are a human being and no one is EVER obliged to beg, it is an ENTIRELY

VOLUNTARY ACTION. You canNEVERclaim, oh they made me APPLY. No-one has EVERmade you apply for anything,SUBMISSION is their OTHER tricky little definition. It means TO AGREE to BEND to anotherswill or to lead to anothers discretion. If you are AGREEING to bend to someones will, you are INCONTRACT with them and again in order for it to be voluntarily and lawful it HAS to be voluntary. Ifyou are agreeing to LEAVE something at someones discretion and in order for you to LEGALLYleave something, you must have possession and OWNERSHIP of it. Again you are ABANDONING itand it is an ENTIRELY voluntary action.They get ALL YOUR POWERwhen you PUT yourSIGNATURE which is EVIDENCE of a NOTE

on a document with the word REGISTRATION-APPLICATION-SUBMISSION.They do it with every thing. You want to register your kids? What are you going to do? Youre

SUBMITTING an APPLICATION forREGISTRATION. You want to register REAL property thenyou SUBMIT your APPLICATION for REGISTRATION, - EVERY TIME! Robert-Arthur:Menard. "Truth does not have to be believed for it to be true!"

EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT CONTRACTDo you have a right to YOUR labour? Yes, but the problem is under the EMPLOYMENTCONTRACT, it is NOT the (living) man or woman that is being employed, it is a CORPORATION(Evidenced by the ALL CAPITAL LETTER NAME) that is being EMPLOYED. A one PERSONindividual CORPORATION and the tax is on the PRIVILEGE of the CORPORATION basically



18/43

receiving an Admiralty "chose in action" ACCOUNTING slip for PAYMENT RATHER THAN anexchange of LABOUR for SUBSTANCE (lawful money- silver or Gold coin) which the man orwoman would have if they did it on a quid pro quo basis with a SUBSTANCE coin made of gold orsilver which the public does not currently show exists under PUBLIC POLICY.Jack Smith

CHOOSE WISELY! PRESENTMENTSWhat is the TRICKthat they are doing here [Sending out charges/summons to the DEFENDANT, allcapital letter name] that is a TEST upon YOU to see how YOU are going to respond to this? If youJOIN into an argument YOU are the DEFENDANT/DEBTOR. Here is how SUBTLE the TRICKis.Who did they send the NOTICE to? THE DEBTOR/DEFENDANT! That is what it says in thenotice, the all capital letter names on the notices. They did NOT send the notice to the LIVINGMAN/CREDITOR. His name WASNT on it, but he got it.What is theirTRICKhere? In other words they sent it to the DEFENDANT. You see theDEFENDANT is a CREATION, its a TRUST and as a TRUST, there are TWO SIDES to the Trust,there is the CONTROLLERand there is the OPERATORto that Trust. The OPERATORS are theOWNER/USERS and theyre the debtors. The CONTROLLERS are the CREDITORS and they

make the legal determination. Now the government THROWS the DEFENDANT out as theCALLING CARD as the attraction and they NEVERthrow it out there and say, Were thegovernment and were CONTROLLING this entity. They just throw it out there to see what theother party is going to do. And if you start DEFENDING it, youre the OWNER/OPERATORof thatentity, so you have CHOSEN UNWISELY to be the DEBTOR, which makes the governmentautomatically, be default, the CREDITOR.

When you RETURN ALL THE DOCUMENTATION forSETTLEMENT and CLOSURE andthen use your authority to SETTLE and CLOSE the CHARGES, youre acting like theCONTROLLER, which makes the government the OWNER/OPERATORand DEBTOR. Theyalways take what it is that YOU dont perform BY DEFAULT. Jack Smith.

DON'T REJECT THE ACCOUNT! PRESENTMENTSThe ISSUE isnt did you create an account for that fiction or that illusion thats NOT the issue!Because the FICTION is in THEIR SYSTEM, let them CREATE any accounts they want.The POINT is HOW are you going to drag me into yourILLUSION and how are you going to BINDme into SERVITUDE when YOU DENIED ME THE SUBSTANCE of GOLD AND SILVERtoSETTLE accounts so that I CAN BE FREE? You took away all of my remedy, which means you haveDAMAGED me UNLESS you have given me something to REPLACE THAT. [That is your PRE-PAID, Social Security Trust account of course!]What did they give? They GAVE you an insurance policy to PRE-PAY all of YOUR ACCOUNTS but

DONT REJECT THE ACCOUNT but ASKforSETTLEMENT based upon the accounting method.-Jack Smith.

COMMERCIAL ACCEPTANCE BOTHVENUESThis one makes for a GREAT STIPULATION!Remember when there is ANY documentation which is used OUTSIDE OF YOURJURISDICTION or domain it needs to have been WITNESSED in BOTH VENUES and BOTHJURISDICTIONS or domains. So when your signature APPEARS on your documentation, that



19/43

signature is coming from the LIVING SOUL in the original jurisdiction and venue. You havetendered it to the OFFICIAL in the county which is a MILITARY OVER-RUN jurisdictionalgovernment and that county official as a FOREIGNER, when they CERTIFY the document they arebasically ACKNOWLEDGINGFOREIGN AMBASSADORadversarys paperwork.If the OFFICIAL has NOT ISSUED PROTEST that they DONT want you there, they haveTACITLY ACCEPTED YOU as a FOREIGNERand when they have placed their signatures and

SEALS on your paperwork that is a COMMERCIAL ACCEPTANCE and they haveACKNOWLEDGED YOU being there and if they have ACCEPTED YOU then they have respondedto your presentation of paperwork in an HONOURABLE manner.ONE ALWAYS ACCEPTS TENDER OFFERS unless youre going to PROTEST or go intoWARFARE. When you present your documents as an OFFERyou are going into the FOREIGNGOVERNMENT acting in a HUMBLE CAPACITY asking I am here as an ambassador, will youallow me to be present? So what they are doing by the way they are doing this that THEIRACTIONS ARE SPEAKING LOUDERthan their words.- Jack Smith.

CONVERSION OF LIABILITY PRESENTMENTSThe primary benefit of the PRIVATE ADMINSTRATIVE PROCESS to which I will refer to as theForeign Advisory and the primary benefit of that initial Bond is that it serves as a VEHICLE toCONVERT THE LIABILITY. They came at YOU with a HOLLOW charge, that was not charged upso to speak, it had NO COMMERCIAL ENERGY and you CHARGED IT UP, by the way that isWHY you do the ACCEPTANCE FOR VALUE and return it to them. You return it to TREASURYwith your INDEMNITY BOND or your OFFSET BOND, saying that it is ACCEPTED BY THEDRAWEE and that you wish to make a DEPOSIT to the TREASURY with a CHARGE to be made tothat vendors account. So now you have given it COMMERCIAL ENERGY and you also paid it withthe indemnity bond. It is now also serving as a CONVERSION OF LIABILITY or a NOTICE ofconversion of liability. Dr Sam Kennedy.

CREATING AN INDEMNITY BOND PRESENTMENTSThe HELL FIRE STRATEGY!So YOU could issue a bond, place it into the public record and of course NOTICE then has to begiven to the party that is making the claim which is probably the CLERK OF COURT. So if that wereme, I would issue an INDEMNITY BOND naming the Judge, the Clerk, the prosecutor of the case andthe Statute as ACCOUNT HOLDERS and accounts on that Bond. Now I like to make the presentmentprivately to the parties in context of a Foreign Advisory which gives NOTICE of the existence ofthat Bond. It gives NOTICE of settlement and that all happens on the PRIVATE SIDE. That BONDis serving as my COUNTERCLAIM and that is ALL it should take.

It could be a one page scribbled letter saying, Heres a copy of a Bond. Please note that you have beennamed thereon and hence I am the UNDERWRITERorTITLE HOLDERorFIRST IN LINELIEN HOLDER. I have the First right of Lien to this transaction (To this matter or to this issue or tothis case) Dr Sam Kennedy.

CREDIT DEBT BASED SYSTEM DEBTMost people look at credit as a GIFT. Many people when they get a CREDIT CARD, approvedfrom a credit card company will literally look at it as NEW FOUND MONEY, as if they haveactually been given something and NOT look at it as having another PAIR OF SHACKLES



20/43

stamped around their wrists or ankles. It is like a TIME MACHINE, credit is like a timemachine. If you CANT afford to buy something right now with what you have right now andyou buy it on installment payments in a sense you are bringing it FROM THE FUTURE thatyou cant afford, and bringing it into the present so you can have it right now for theGRATIFICATION or DESIRE that you need right now and then you pay it off with todaysUNCERTAIN DOLLARS.

One of the INSANITIES of the 20th Century is that EVERYBODY lives in a separate Box and itis considered a badge of shame or failure to still be living with your family when you either 20,30 or even 40 years old. One of the problems with our socialized DEBT based system is that itSCATTERS FAMILY to the wind. When you have CRADLE TO GRAVE rainbow welfarestate that takes care of you 100% everything is subsidized to the point where you could failvirtually completely and theres still this RAINBOW OF BENEFITS to take care of you but italso destroys the family because everyone is FREE to break off on their own, establish theirown roots and buytheir own Box and try to desperately pay for it and even go into debt justfor the basics. This WHOLE system goes against the familyto PULL together as a team as was100 plus years ago.

CHALLENGE

This comes from the Following website (click on Link) - www.thinkfree.ca

Freeman-on-the-Land Robert-Arthur: Menard Does hereby extend aCHALLENGE TO DEBATE

To: Any and All members ofThe Law Society of BC or Canadian BarAssociation

Any and All Judges of the Provincial Court of British Columbia

Any and All Judges of the Supreme Court of British Columbia

Any and All Crown Prosecutors

Any and All Peace Officers and Police Officers

Any and All Canada Revenue Agents

Any and All Corrections or Sheriffs Officers

Any and All MPs MLAs or other elected officials

TOPICS TO BE DEBATED:

Do statutes enjoy the force of law without the consent of the governed?(FreemanRobert-Arthur says No)

Do courts require mutual consent of both parties to the adjudication prior toproviding services? (FreemanRobert-Arthur says Yes)

http://www.thinkfree.ca/http://www.thinkfree.ca/


21/43

Does a SIN mean we are working legally for the legal entity known as CANADA?(Freeman Robert-Arthur

says Yes)

Can we abandon our SIN and avoid paying income taxes? (Freeman Robert-Arthursays Yes)

Can we fire the government and exist free of all statutory restraints andobligations? (Freeman Robert-Arthur says Yes)

Do the people of British Columbia have a right to justice and can they lawfullyconvene their own courts to bring charges against the existing courts?

(Freeman Robert-Arthur says Yes)

If this challenge is not accepted then it shall be deemed that all of the abovethings Freeman-on-the-Land Robert-Arthur: Menard is willing to debate anddefend are in fact truths and do in fact bind the government and those to whomthis challenge has been extended. If this challenge is not accepted then a seminar

explaining all these truths will be presented. Furthermore failure to accept thislawful challenge will be seen by most as evidence that the government has beenknowingly and willfully employing negligence, deception and fraud. Go towww.thinkfree.ca for more details

DEFENDANT is TOBY THE SLAVE COURTSomeone is standing, in court, at a microphone, WHO does the JUDGE SEE? The Judge sees THEDEFENDANT because that is the ONLY PARTY that the Judge can SEE. And so when the judge looks at theguy and says, You have to get an attorney. Well excuse me! THE JUDGE IS BLIND! He ONLY ASSUMESthat I am TOBY THE SLAVE, The Defendant. I dont believe for one second that he has the CAPACITY toCOMPEL me to be TOBY. If I KNOW that I am not TOBY and the Judge looks straight at me and says, You

need to get an attorney, Ill go home and write a LETTER ROGATORY and turn over the BIRTHCERTIFICATE into the court and tell them that they are now the OPERATORand half at it, you canappoint anyone you want to REPRESENT TOBY! Hasnt that solved the problem now? Jack Smith.

Next time a court session is there and I show up again and the judge says, Have you got an attorney? WHODOES HE THINK I AM? THE DEFENDANT, TOBY THE SLAVE! How am I going to respond to the

judge? ASK A QUESTION!Your Honour, hasnt the court been notified that they are theOPERATOR of the ACCOUNT through the SURRENDER OF THE DEFENDANT? Has the court not

seen fit to appoint counsel for the DEFENDANT? And then shut the heck up! What have you just done? Thecourt is going to have to come up with some kind of story to fill the embarrassment. Do you understand? If youwant to volunteer and be TOBY, the Defendant, go ahead! And if you say nothing, you either are inCONTEMPT of court or you volunteer to be TOBY!- Jack Smith

CREDIT DEBT BASED SYSTEM DEBTMost people look at credit as a GIFT. Many people when they get a CREDIT CARD, approvedfrom a credit card company will literally look at it as NEW FOUND MONEY, as if they haveactually been given something and NOT look at it as having another PAIR OF SHACKLESstamped around their wrists or ankles. It is like a TIME MACHINE, credit is like a timemachine. If you CANT afford to buy something right now with what you have right now andyou buy it on installment payments in a sense you are bringing it FROM THE FUTURE that



22/43

you cant afford, and bringing it into the present so you can have it right now for theGRATIFICATION or DESIRE that you need right now and then you pay it off with todaysUNCERTAIN DOLLARS.

One of the INSANITIES of the 20th Century is that EVERYBODY lives in a separate Box and itis considered a badge of shame or failure to still be living with your family when you either 20,30 or even 40 years old. One of the problems with our socialized DEBT based system is that itSCATTERS FAMILY to the wind. When you have CRADLE TO GRAVE rainbow welfarestate that takes care of you 100% everything is subsidized to the point where you could failvirtually completely and theres still this RAINBOW OF BENEFITS to take care of you but italso destroys the family because everyone is FREE to break off on their own, establish theirown roots and buytheir own Box and try to desperately pay for it and even go into debt justfor the basics. This WHOLE system goes against the familyto PULL together as a team as was100 plus years ago.

CERTIFYING YOUR DOCUMENTS

CERTIFIEDWhats TRUE and CORRECT? The ONLY thing that is EVER True and Correct are the WORDS putonto the paper THATS IT! and ONLY AT THAT MOMENT! When something is CERTIFIED it isONLY certified up until the MOMENT it is certified, afterwards it DOESNT APPLY.An affidavit is only good up until the moment it is certified, because after that you might change yourmind again. SO it has NO force and effect after CERTIFICATION. The government CANNOT acceptpaperwork UNLESS it has been CERTIFIED.They need to see someone put their signature on their forms THEN they will ACCEPT IT. So ifsomeone puts a signature to something that says its true and correct on government forms, they WILLaccept it BUT all they are accepting is INFORMATION, nothing more! Victor Robert: Beck

BREACH OF CONTRACT CONTRACTNow from the point of view of a Sovereign Individual what has happened is that there has been aBREACH OF CONTRACT with our government. Government has usurped the common law, thats the10 commandments and replaced it with a form of the Roman Civil law, thats the TEN PLANKS to thecommunist manifesto and as a result government is constantly managing our affairs without ourauthority, but they certainly have our consent.George Gordon

HANDY INFO ON BIRTH CERTIFICATES IDENTIFICATIONAn ENTRY is regarded as a RECORD ofFACTS AT THE TIME (Or moment) ofBIRTH NOT afterthe Fact. A BIRTH CERTIFICATE accordingly constitutes revealing NOT current identity BUTHISTORICAL FACTS. A BIRTH CERTIFICATE IS NOTPERSONAL IDENTIFICATION. So aBIRTH CERTIFICATE is NOTpersonal IDENTIFICATION however it is being treated as if it is personalidentification.Victor-Robert: Beck

WARNING ON BIRTH CERTIFICATES IDENTIFICATIONthe government point out that the use of birth certificates for identification purposes isDISCOURAGED by the REGISTRAR GENERAL [discouraged does not mean encouraged] andbirth certificates areNOT evidence of the IDENTITY of the person PRESENTING IT. Do youunderstand what that means?However it is a matter for the individuals whether to follow this recommendation or not. When youPOINT OUT to the government that you didnt DISCLOSE what this is, you DIDNT WARN me



23/43

what this is, either you DID this to DECEIVE ME or youre going to fix the problem very, veryquickly Victor-Robert: Beck

FREELY GIVEN FREELY RECEIVED LOVETrinity is representative ofthree of four components. Every Heart from where love comes has fourchambers.

If one pays with debt money, the stuff everyone wants, the contract lives and thus there is no trueclosure. In other words, if one pays with debt money, although the account will reflect the payment, infact no payment was made, thus the contract lives as does the obligation because the account could notclose, although unseen and unknown to you but is why you are stuck in the legal BS.The missing component is the spirit of love..........Unconditional giving to receive without askinganything in return. I give plus to you, you give plus back and I give plus to Brent and Brent gives plusback to Me, and on we can all go forever and ever amen. There is no accounting here if the givingis done happily and ungrudgingly, serving out of love.It is the missing of the giving of a plus (lack of love) that the trouble begins and in come thedoctors/lawyers to act against you because the only reason they are, is because you did not release thelegal title son. Here there is an accounting because of all the contracts that are still alive. Not closed

although in the public they are but internally with the trustee they are not.For the legal guy the son is the legal title to the product/Value birthed from the contract as thats whatgives life, is growth, and expansion, in the business world just as it is in God's world, and why it iswhat it is as it created itself as God created the uni-verse, one song, one way home, one word,vibration..........The love frequency. Giving and receiving freely without, hesitation or resistance.And then there was the word..........LOVE....................the beginning and the end of all that is, but viewfrom a business/legal world perspective after having seen who you are from an I am made by theGod of all gods perspective. Ta Daaaa....

FIRST HAND PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE COURTThe prosecutor does NOT have FIRST HAND PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE, nor does he have the

Capability to CERTIFY that the CHARGE is[1] Accurate because he wasnt there! And number[2] that the Statute that theyre ACTING UNDERis BONDED and INSURED! What youre dealingwith isPRIVATE CORPORATE LAW. Youre NOT dealing with PUBLIC LAW Sam Davis

FIDUCIARIES & TRUSTEES- appointed govt officials FIDUCARIESPeople who have been appointed to serve as Fiduciaries and Trusteesof the Public wheel are under an Inescapable obligation to serve thepeople with the highest Fidelity. In discharging the duties of theiroffice they are required to display such intelligence and skill as they

are capable of and be diligent and conscientious to exercise theirDiscretion, not arbitrarily but reasonably and above all to display goodfaith, honesty, integrity and honour in order to protect and maintainthe Private Rights of each and every living soul that each man orwoman holding office have obligated themselves to uphold."

EQUALITY IS EQUITY LOVE



24/43

EQUALITY is Equity and the concept of EQUALITY we are referring to for purposes of thisinformation is based upon an unconditional desire to serve others first and foremost. God set us all outEQUAL and if any transaction of any kind, legal or not, leaves any party better or worse off than theother(s), that is not the equality and not equity. The concept of Equity/Love is equality. You do not andcannot have a claim in equity if all parties that are or will be affected by a transaction do not walk awayequal; that is to say, no party can claim any other party was unjustly enriched = balanced

scales.......EQUALITY of the non payment kind.There are three parties to be concerned about here on this earth.The public the government and you. Each cannot have claim against any other for there to beequality......Now there is what you see, the tangible property, and what you do not see, the form, to betaken into consideration that fits with this information............See if you see it............2000 years but I think we know the meaning of the Crucifixion of Christ. A Father Son thing, from asolar and legal system perspective.

Our Father who art in Heaven, hallowed be thy name, thy kingdom come, thou shalt be done on earthas it is in Heaven, give us this day our daily bread and forgive us our debts as weforgive our debtors,and lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil, for thyne is the kingdom and the power andthe glory forever and ever......... In other words, however Heaven is, so to is it the same here on earth,except judgement gets in the way.God in Heaven = Property/Growth/Multiply = god on earth/Government____________________________________________________________________PEOPLE/Son = GOODS AND SERVICES = TITLE/SON

When the Son/Promise is Homes-Car's-Furniture When the Son (Value)returned after death, the is released, death of theaccount is Closed Contract/Promise/Obligation

There shall be a death occur, and the account is closed.

There must be a death for a life/contract to be holy/whole/finished.

FIDUCIARIES AND PRINCIPALS IDENTIFICATIONEveryone out there right now believes that the BIRTH CERTIFICATE and other GOVERNMENTIDENTIFICATION is PERSONAL identification but ITS NOT. That is the mistake that has got us allBOUND UP, thats the focus point right here. The birth certificate is NOT personal identification, if you curethat problem then all of the EFFECTS change too. So if you GO BACK to the CAUSE of the problem andCORRECT IT the effect changes subsequently automatically Victor-Robert: Beck

[Just a note here! If you have not picked up on this yet the key word above is PERSONAL

identification. It is evidence of a historical event because the govt can ONLY register an event.- it

CANNOT EVER identify you or anyone else for that matter- Pierino]

All the companies you are doing business with believe you ARE the BIRTHCERTIFICATE/STRAWMAN thats the PROBLEM, nothing else, It SITS right there- VictorRobert: Beck

[Remember that ALL POWER AND AUTHORITY WAS GIVEN UNTO YOU!- AS THE

PRINCIPAL!]

"So in effect what's happening is that the FIDUCIARIES are RUNNING the world instead of thePRINICIPALS. The PRINICIPALS HAVE NOT shown up yet- And that's YOU PEOPLE!"-Victor-Robert: Beck



25/43

QUOTE!

"Liberty lives in you HEART, it does NOT live in ANY founding document/s" -Lighting the Firesof Liberty!

LEGAL ENTITY IDENTIFICATIONWell Look at South Australia. I exist as a man in South Australia. I DO NOT exist as a PERSON inthe STATE OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA and thats part of their deception and they DONT want youto realize that its NOT a geographical area, its a LEGAL ENTITY, therefore what you call lawsare really JUST the rules for the PERSONS existing within this LEGAL ENTITY.

THE HELL FIRE STRATEGY!- REMEDY! HONOURHello One and All,I just want to caution everyone against going down the path of placing liens against officials,or liquidating any person and/or thinking about conversion of dishonours into monetary gains,

especially if you are proceeding in any matter whereby YOU are the party seeking a remedy[i.e. from a defensive position].

This type of thinking really does stem from the assumption and presumption that the publicofficials are corrupt and do not operate within the law. All public officials have a duty andobligation to protect one's rights and from my own experience they do in fact protect them, butmore so when one seeking a remedy has gone about it in the correct manner - which is reallywhat the problem is - a lack of knowledge as to how to do this. The public officials do in factdeliberately go into a dishonour in order to give you your remedy which usually manifestsitself in silence or argument in order to AGREE with you. Once one has that AGREEMENTthrough the silence of one or more of the public officials one must be focused upon using that

dishonour as evidence of their agreement rather than on placing liens, liquidation or anyconversion of that dishonour into public liability instruments which in and of itself is goingagainst the grain, if you are expecting the public officials to recognize that you are the livingbreathing sentient man who knows there is no money.Once you have a public official in a dishonourand therefore their agreement by thatdishonour [silence or argument], then one's honourable duty and obligation is to present theirrecord of that dishonour [agreement/stipulation] to the appropriate data integrity reviewboard for review in order to have the records corrected - one should not be doing any form ofcharging or attacking at that time. Other than proceeding on the very counterproductiveassumption and presumption that the public officials are deliberately corrupt I cannot see how

conversion of a dishonour into funds or placing any liens on any public officials or liquidatingany public official can still be proceeding in an honourable manner. From my relativelymedium term but very intensive experience and focus, this type of thinking arises out of botha lack of practical experience and adequate understanding of the procedures that one mustfollow and apply to obtain their remedy in an honourable manner.Scripture does NOT say, "go first to your brother and get an agreement [stipulation throughhis silence and/or arguments which both constitute a dishonour] and then either liquidate himor convert that dishonour into funny money or place a lien on him"



26/43

It is far better for the so-called experts to admit that they do not fully understand a certainprocess, or cannot fully understand why a remedy was not given in a certain matter and/oradmit that they have not had the level of success that they would like to claim rather thanteaching people to bypass the honourable way of settling and closing a matter. It is RARE fora public official not to grant a remedy whereby a party has executed such remedy in the

correct manner, this usually only happens by way of sincere and genuine error of law, and it isfar more scripturally sound and morally ethical to admit that one has not yet mastered anentire process.

If one has to resort to liquidation or placing of liens or conversion of dishonours into funnymoney when there is clearly a remedy without having to resort to such tactics, then oneshould perhaps consider embarking on that journey to find the rest of the pieces of the puzzlewhich they have not yet discovered ather than attempting to charge their brother. The majorityof people appear to end up going down the incorrect road rather than admitting that they are"not there yet". Regards Claude

One of the HELL FIRE STRATEGIES is LIQUIDATION. MONEY/DEBTIn context of COMMERCE what that means is that we take their DISHONOUR, the CONVERSIONOF LIABILITY and we use that as the MONETARY EXPANSION to fund an instrument toTreasury to have Treasury SECURE or SEIZE the Fugitive or STOLEN funds from the presentersbond.How can a DISHONOURbe funds? Well a dishonour is NOTHING MORE than a LIABILITY and itis CERTIFIED as a liability. It is CLEAR that in the system of COMMERCE, the system ofBANKRUPTCY in which we NOW exist in, a commercial system based upon an ABSENCE oftangible assets ( SUBSTANCE MONEY) AND uses as its monetary curriculum LIABILITY!

LIABILITY IS THE CURRICULUM OF PAYMENT! A FICTIONAL ASSET IN THESYSTEM. The liability of a DISHONOUR is in theory the same as payment of the instrument of whichthe dishonour is DULY NOTED.If you pay Federal Reserve notes to someone, $100 dollars and they send it back to you and say Imsorry we only accept cheques they have CONVERTED THE LIABILITY into FUNDS that theyhave to then apply against the account. I paid YOU the $100, you REJECTED IT, YOU are nowHOLDING THE LIABILITY ergo youre holding the funds to SETTLE THAT ACCOUNT, It isnow a DONE DEAL! That is why the funds can be used to FUND a payment instrument to theSecretary of the Treasury! Dr Sam Kennedy

JUDICIAL DETERMINATIONS COURTA JUDICIAL DETERMINATION is a FINDING, a finding of fact. If the judge says, I am entering aplea FOR YOU ofNot guilty he is doing one of TWO THINGS, he is either REPRESENTING YOUbecause youre incompetent and you cant represent yourself OR he is making a judicial determination.

Now a Judicial determination is a finding of fact. So my question is Your honour! Are you making aJUDICIAL DETERMINATION or are you alleging that you somehow REPRESENT me? Sam Davis

I-ROBOT MOVIE QUOTE

I-Robot: "My responses are limited... You must ask the right question"! The responses are limited...they are in the Holy Bible. We just need to ask the right question!



27/43

HOW COURT CASES BEGIN COURTHOW CASES BEGINMany COURT cases begin very simply, for example a traffic case a foreclosure case that can suddenly turn intoa CONTEMPT situation. It could be a very serious (Expensive) charge at least from the perspective ofFICTIONS.It is VERY COMMON that an attorney/lawyer simply goes to the court and ENTERS some form of piece ofpaper, nothing more than that. That paper CHARGES a particular LEGAL ENTITY (FICTION) with some sortof Statutory Violation.[Term CONVERSION OF LIABILITY] How you handle the LIABILITY is a KEY FACTOR in this entire(Commercial) game. In fact LIABILITY IS THE KEY INGREDIENT in the ENTIRE PROCESS both from theperspective of the PUBLIC LAWYERS and from the perspective of the PRIVATE MAN trying to send off theFICTIONAL actor.When a lawyer makes a PRESENTMENT to the court he is really ENTERING a LIBEL in the AdmiraltyVenue. He is entering a piece of paper that CHARGES a particular LEGAL ENTITY for some form ofFICTIONAL WRONG DOING and yet he (Lawyer) has NO SURETY to back it up other than his RISKMANAGEMENT carrier (Insurance/Bond).What he is intending to do is IMPLY that a SURETY exists by way of whatever invisible contracts are beingpresumed, Drivers license, Social Insurance Contract, whatever it is. They are operating with the BELIEF that aLIABILITY EXISTS by virtue of YOUR BIRTH to a particular Statute.Technically and commercially and in Admiralty, the lawyer is on a FISHING EXPEDITION, he is doingnothing more than rolling the Dice. He is putting out a call basically looking for the FUNDS for someone(Sucker) to step forward and FUND THIS PROCESS and for someone to step forward and ASSUME aSURETY POSITION ON BEHALF OF THE CHARGED ENTITY THE STRAWMAN!

Typically in Admiralty that party would be an OWNER of the VESSEL or an INTERESTED CREDITOR whowishes to protect his claim for some third party with an interest who steps up and says, I will acceptresponsibility. The way in which the lawyer empha

jack smith - list of quotes

Documents