iv fluid administration in sepsis - manchester … fluid administration in...iv fluid administration...
TRANSCRIPT
IV fluid administration in sepsis
Dr David Inwald Consultant in PICU
St Mary’s Hospital, London CATS, London
The talk
• What is septic shock?
• What are the recommendations?
• What is the evidence?
• Do we follow them?
• What should we do next?
Not included (but probably more important)
• Vaccination
• Early warning scores and tools
• Antibiotic resistance
• Education
• Genetic determinants of disease severity
A definition of shock
• A clinical syndrome of inadequate tissue perfusion
• DO2 < VO2
Septic shock
• Increased capillary permeability
• Dysregulation of vascular tone
• Depression of myocardial function
• Disseminated intravascular thrombosis
Increased capillary permeability
Dysregulation of vascular tone
Carcillo JA et al, Crit Care Med. 2002;30:1365-78
Sepsis
Warm shock High CO
vasodilation
Cold shock Low CO
vasoconstriction
Depression of myocardial contractility
Children – individual physiology
• Relative hypovolaemia
• Pump failure (variable)
• Vascular tone (variable)
• All unquantified
Management – one size fits all
• A & B management
• “Optimise” preload
• 20 mls/kg aliquots isotonic saline/colloid
• At 40-60 mls/kg reassess and consider inotropic support
• If developing pulmonary oedema consider “elective” ventilation
…in the first hour
Crit Care Med 2009; 37:666–688
isotonic crystalloid or colloid
Frank-Starling curve
inotrope
fluids
J Physiol. 1914 Sep 8;48(5):357-79
RAP
Car
dia
c o
utp
ut
..it is possible to overfill the heart…
…and the system is very complex
Lungs = black box
Pressure Flow
Sympathetic stimulation Parasympathetic stimulation
Shim EB et al, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A (2006) 364, 1483–1500
Somatic influences
What is the evidence for the guidelines?
Carcillo JA et al, JAMA, 1991
Fluid in early septic shock • Retrospective review of 34 pediatric
patients with culture positive septic shock, from 1982-1989
• Hypovolemia determined by PCWP, urine output and hypotension. All on pressors.
• Three groups: • 1: received up to 20 mls/kg in 1st 1 hour
• 2: received 20-40 mls/kg in 1st hour
• 3: received greater than 40 mls/kg in 1st hour
• No difference in ARDS between the 3 groups
Early fluid and inotrope resuscitation 10 - fold reduction in mortality rate
Booy R et al, Arch Dis Child 2001;85:386-90
Early reversal of shock • Retrospective study of 91 children with septic
shock. Shock reversal, adherence to ACCM-PALS Guidelines, hospital mortality.
• 26 (29%) patients died.
• >9 x increased odds of survival (96%) in 24 (26%) patients in whom shock reversal was achieved by 75 minutes
• ACCM-PALS guidelines followed in 27 (30%) patients; in these patients, a lower mortality was observed (8% vs 38%)
Han YY et al Pediatrics. 2003;112:793-9
Fluid resuscitation of hypovolemic shock: acute medicine's great triumph for
children
Carcillo JA and Tasker RC, ICM 2006;32:958-61
Brierley J et al, Crit Care Med 2009; 37:666–688
Up to and over 60 ml/kg by 15 minutes
Do we follow the recommendations?
Arch Dis Child. 2009;94:348-53
PICS sepsis audit
• 200 patients with sepsis accepted to UK PICUs over 6 months 2006-7
• Median age 1.13 yrs (IQR 0.24 – 3.17)
• PIM2 predicted mortality 10% (5-16)
• 184 (92%) ventilated
• 138 (69%) required inotropes
• 24 (12%) required RRT
PICS sepsis audit
• 34 (17%) died
• 139 (70%) shocked on referral to PICU – 83/139 (60%) failed to reverse shock – 22 (26%)
died
– 53/139 (40%) reversed shock – 3 (6%) died
– p=0.02, Chi square, 3 patients not classified
PICS sepsis audit
• 107 (53%) shocked on arrival to PICU
• risk of death – OR=3.7 (95% CI 1.4-10.2), p=0.008
• ACCM-PALS guideline NOT followed in relation to – > 60 mls/kg fluid in 21/107 (20%)
– > 60 mls/kg + inotrope in only 68/107 (62%)
“The reasons for clinicians failing to follow simple algorithms for resuscitation are unclear and need further investigation”.
• African children with severe febrile illness with either impaired consciousness or respiratory distress, and impaired perfusion - Albumin bolus
- Saline bolus 20 ml/kg over 1 hour
- No bolus
• 48 hour mortality - Albumin group – 10.6% (111/1050)
- Saline group – 10.5% (110/1047)
- Control group – 7.3% (76/1044), p=0.003
}
• Definitions unusual
- Severity = impaired consciousness OR respiratory distress
• African epidemiology
- High incidence of malaria, malnutrition, malaria
• No ICU treatments available (and in many centres no oxygen)
• Cause of death in bolus groups not known
Recent PICU studies (2011–2015)
Flori et al (2011). Acute lung injury, n=320. Increased ventilation days and mortality.
Arikan et al (2012). General PICU population, n=80. Oxygenation index, ventilation days, and LOS
Valentine et al (2012). Acute lung injury, n=168. Fewer ventilator-free-days at 28 days
Sinitsky et al (2015). General PICU population, n=636. Oxygenation index and ventilation days
Bhaskar et al (2015). General PICU, n=114. Mortality
How much fluid?
What fluid?
What fluid? • Hydroxyethyl starch associated with mortality
and RRT in critically ill adults, particularly those with sepsis
• Albumin associated with increased mortality in adults with severe traumatic brain injury
• 0.9% saline may be associated with adverse outcomes due to hyperchloraemic metabolic acidosis
What is the paediatric data?
Goal directed therapy
Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic
shock
NEJM 2001;345:1368-77
Rivers E et al.
Goal directed therapy
• RCT in 263 adult patients with severe sepsis
• Goals: – CVP 8-12 mm Hg
– mean arterial pressure ≥65 mm Hg
– urine output of ≥0.5 mls/kg/h
– central venous (superior vena cava) (Scvo2) or mixed venous oxygen (Svo2) saturation of ≥70%.
• In-hospital mortality 30.5 percent in the group assigned to early goal-directed therapy, 46.5 percent in the group assigned to standard therapy (p = 0.009)
Systematic review
• Five RCTs (n = 4735 patients); no effect on mortality (EGDT: 23.2% mortality [495/2134] versus control: 22.4% mortality [582/2601], p=0.9
• The pooled estimate of 90-day mortality from the three recent multicentre studies (n = 4063) showed no difference [OR 0.99 (95 % CI 0.86-1.15), p = 0.93]
Conclusion?
• We don’t know how much fluid to give – and when
• We don’t know what fluid to give
• We don’t know whether EGDT works in kids or not
Current management
• A - Airway
• B - Breathing
• C - Circulation
ACCM-PALS goals
• HR
• BP
• CRT
• Conscious level
• Peripheral skin temperature
• Urine output
November 2011 - Manchester United 1-0 Sunderland Wes Brown gifts three points to Sir Alex Ferguson as 25th
anniversary present with own goal
ACCM-PALS goals
• HR – effect of pain, fever, distress
• BP – 5th centile? 50th centile?
• CRT – ambient temp? methodology?
• Conscious level
• Peripheral skin temperature
• Urine output
Paediatric sepsis management – Levels of evidence for anecdote-based
medicine
• Level I: Beardy old gent from Royal College
• Level II: Doctor with air of credibility and honest face
• Level III: Academic with mad stare
• Level IV: NHS manager with Trust in financial crisis
Conclusion
• Early aggressive fluid therapy current “gold standard”
• Lack of trial evidence
• Concerns raised by FEAST
• Need a paediatric fluid bolus trial in developed world