item # 9
DESCRIPTION
Item # 9. CO 2 Emissions from Cars, Trucks & Buses in the Metropolitan Washington Region Presentation to the National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board Ronald F. Kirby Director of Transportation Planning June 20, 2007. Carbon Dioxide (CO 2 ) Methane (CH 4 ) Nitrous Oxide (N 2 O) - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
CO2 Emissions fromCars, Trucks & Busesin the Metropolitan Washington Region
Presentation to the National Capital Region
Transportation Planning Board
Ronald F. KirbyDirector of Transportation Planning
June 20, 2007
Item # 9
2
Greenhouse Gases
Carbon Dioxide (CO2)
Methane (CH4)
Nitrous Oxide (N2O)
Hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs)Perfluorocarbons (PFCs)Sulfur Hexafluoride (SF6)
CH47%
N207%
HFC2%
CO284%
COG Climate Change Steering Committee, May 23, 2007
3
Emission SourcesElectricity On-road Motor VehiclesSolid WasteWastewaterNatural Gas/Home Heating OilAviation, Rail, Construction, AgricultureSubstitutes to Ozone Depleting SubstancesLand Use, Land Use Change, and Forestry
COG Climate Change Steering Committee, May 23, 2007
4
US Greenhouse Gas Emissions by Sector
Agriculture7%
Industry20%
Residential6%
Electricity Generation
32%
Transportation28%
Commercial7%
COG Climate Change Steering Committee, May 23, 2007
Source:
EPA 2004
National GHG
Inventory
5
Estimates of CO2 Emissions from Mobile Sources (Cars, Trucks & Buses) in the Metropolitan Washington Region
8-hour Ozone Non-Attainment Area (map on next slide)2006 CLRP, Round 7.0a Cooperative Forecasts2005 Regional Fleet Inventory(New Inventory scheduled for 2008)EPA Mobile 6.2 Emissions Model
6
8-Hour Ozone Non-Attainment Area
7
Annual Mobile CO2 Emissions (Tons) for
8-Hour Ozone Non-Attainment Area
Note: Years 2000, 2005 and 2020 were interpolated using 2002, 2010 and 2030 emissions estimates from the October 18, 2006 conformity determination.
8
2002-2030 Changes in Households, Employment, VMT, NOx, VOC and CO2 for the 8-Hour Ozone Non-Attainment
Area2002 2030 % ChangeHouseholds 2,893,646 4,162,621 44%Employment 1,742,117 2,463,893 41%Annual VMT (000,000’s)
39,212 53,726 37%
NOx (tons/day)
259.232 34.899 -87%
VOC (tons/day)
101.117 39.41 -61%
CO2 (tons/year)
23,273,168
34,450,922
48%
9
Regional Average Rates for CO2
(Grams per Vehicle Mile)
2002 2010 2030
Major Road Network
506 527 546
Local Roads 454 476 490School Bus 1,634 1,642 1,647Transit Bus 2,402 2,350 2,334
10
Vehicle Fleet and Demographic Data for the Washington Region by State
DC MD VA Washington Metro Area National
Passenger Vehicles 178,665 935,998 889,426 2,004,089 105,955,155
Light Duty Trucks 63,193 568,131 549,240 1,180,563 97,974,626
Heavy Duty Trucks 8,936 85,160 69,829 163,925 15,389,261
Total Vehicles 250,794 1,589,289 1,508,495 3,348,578 219,328,042
Population 577,500 2,236,600 2,057,700 4,871,800 296,410,400
Vehicles per Person 0.43 0.71 0. 73 0.69 0.74
Households 252,000 811,500 771,500 1,835,000 122,671,734
Vehicles per Household 1.00 1.96 1.96 1.82 1.79
Hybrid Vehicles 923 2,640 8,280 11,843 405,911
Hybrid Vehicles per 1,000 People 1.60 1.18 4.02 2.43 1.37
Hybrid Vehicles per 1,000 Households 3.66 3.25 10.73 6.45 3.31
Hybrid Percent of Passenger Vehicles 0.52 0.28 0.93 0.59 0.38
Hybrid Percent of Total Vehicles 0.37 0.17 0.55 0.35 0.19
Presentation to the Transportation Planning Board, May 17, 2006
11
California Low Emission Vehicles II (CAL LEV II)More stringent emissions standards for greenhouse gases (CO2, methane, nitrous oxide) and other pollutantsApplies to automobiles and light trucks starting with the 2009 model yearCalifornia requested EPA waiver in December 2005; not yet grantedEleven other states including Maryland plan to adopt CAL LEV II, and another six states are considering these standards
12
Reductions in Annual CO2
Emissions with Regionwide CAL LEV II
Vehicles
13
Reductions in Annual CO2 Emissions (Millions of Tons) with Regionwide
CAL LEV II Vehicles
2002 2020 2030 % Change 2002 - 2030
Baseline 23.273
31.018
34.451
48%
CAL LEV II Reductions
0 4.386 5.993 -
Percent Reductions
0 14.1 17.4 -
Reduced Emissions
23.273
26.632
28.458
22%
14
Additional CO2 Reductions Could be Achieved through Reductions in Vehicle Miles of Travel (VMT)
Travel Demand Reduction Strategies such as Telecommuting, increased transit and ridesharingLand Use/Transportation strategies such as the TPB RMAS ScenariosCurrent programs/scenarios reduce 2030 VMT by one to two percent
15
2030 Household and Employment Growth:
TPB Transit Oriented Development Scenario
16
Conclusions
VOC and NOx mobile emissions are declining significantly even though overall vehicle travel is growing, due primarily to cleaner vehicles and fuelsCO2 mobile emissions are growing steadily. To achieve CO2 reductions we need to:
Reduce CO2 emissions per vehicle mile (e.g. California greenhouse gas emissions standards, Federal CAFE Standards)Reduce vehicle miles of travel (Demand management, land use/transportation strategies)