Case # 644FCompatibility Review

630 Lamont

Presented By: Jason LutzCommunity Development Services Director

City Council MeetingAgenda Item # 7October 10, 2016

CASE NO. 644F Consider a request of Richard Garison, ShellyHome Company, applicant, representing Robert& Catherine Jones, owners, for thecompatibility review of the proposedreplacement structure located at 630 Lamontunder Demolition Review Ordinance No. 1860(April 12, 2010) in order to construct a newsingle-family residence with detachedaccessory structure.

SUMMARY Construct a new single family residence

with detached accessory structure.

4

BACKGROUND

Zoned SF-A Near the southeast corner of Lamont

Ave. and Ciruela St. 636 Lamont was subdivided into 2 lots

on January 9, 2012 (Council). The newly created lot (630 Lamont)

has been vacant since then.

5

6

LOT COVERAGE EXISTING PROPOSEDLot Area 11,250 11,250Main House Footprint 2,314Front Porch 460Side Porch 1Side Porch 2Rear Porch 528Garage Footprint 636Carport FootprintShed(s) FootprintBreezewaysCovered Patio StructureOther Accessory StructuresLot Coverage / Lot Area 0 / 11,250 3,478 / 11,250Total Lot Coverage (Max 40%) 0% 31%

7

FLOOR AREA RATIO (FAR) EXISTING PROPOSEDLot Area 11,250 11,250Main House 1st Floor 2,314Main House 2nd Floor 2,336Garage 1st Floor 636Garage 2nd Floor

Other Structures

FAR / Lot Area0 / 11,250 5,286 / 11,250

Total FAR (45% or max 50% with bonuses) 0% 47%

8

POLICY ANALYSIS

2% bonus for 1 story accessory structure 27’ 7” in height (max allowed 33’) as

measured from average grade Building Materials Hardie siding Composition shingle Roof Brick fire places

9

POLICY ANALYSIS

Tree Removal (14) Trees to be removed (4) Heritage Trees (10) Non-Heritage Trees

10

POLICY ANALYSIS

Heritage Tree Mitigation (2) Mt. Laurel (on-site mitigation) (2) Heritage Oak Trees Removed

‒ No on-site mitigation‒ $6,000 “Fees in Lieu”

11

HERITAGE TREE REMOVAL

12

PROPOSED SITE PLAN

13

FRONT ELEVATION

14

REAR ELEVATION

15

LEFT SIDE ELEVATION

16

RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION

17

18

EXISTING STREETSCAPE

19

PROPOSED STREETSCAPE

20

ADJACENT HOMES – ACROSS STREET

21

ARB RECOMMENDATION ARB review on September 20, 2016

Found the proposed replacement structure tobe compatible

Approved the request with the followingconditions:

That vegetative screening be installedalong the rear property line

22

PUBLIC NOTIFICATION Postcards were mailed to property owners

within a 200-foot radius of the property,appropriate notice was posted on the Citywebsite and a sign was posted on theproperty

Responses received:

Support: (2)

Oppose: (0)

QUESTIONS?