it satisfaction scorecard empire state university€¦ · sample template goal process 1.collect...
TRANSCRIPT
IT SATISFACTION SCORECARD
Empire State UniversityThis document was prepared by Info-Tech Research Group on April 18, 2019Data is comprised of 59 responses , including responses by: Delores Rubio, Ernie Callahan, Katrina Fields, Rose Mcpherson, Kendrick Shaffer, Sonya Marks, Viola Mullins, Lynda Quinn, Mari Everett, Jeannette Giles, Dane Davidson, Priscilla Blankenship, Kim Garrison, Yong Craig, Aileen Bell, Mai Reid, Odell Bryant, Danial Nguyen, Marian Perez, Junior Wall, Donovan Sandoval, Leigh Mata, Christie Archer, Chrystal Madden, Estela Baker, Derek Nicholson, Abby Strong, Katheryn Flowers, Stacey Jones, Gustavo Sanchez, Isiah Huber, Brooke Bruce, Delia Bond, Jame Mcdonald, Alfonso Dillon, Osvaldo Dunn, Manuela Valentine, Tia Hansen, Candace Estrada, Mia Vaughn, Humberto Johns, Jordon Ritter, Sammie Preston, Alba Thornton, Socorro Webster, Angelica Riddle, Tiffany Mack, Mable Wallace, Wilbur Larson, Normand Holt, Vernon Duran, Aida Dominguez, Mark Fischer, Booker Blackburn, Bessie Francis, Warren Wolf, Susanne Wise, Benton Schwartz, Charlotte Ayala
44 respondents did not complete the survey , including: Nelda Sutton, Aida Muha, Rufus Arias, Claud Barton, Greta Ryan, Bruce Berry, Alma Webster, Alyce Wong, Delia Grimes, Joseph Lewis, Estella Hull, Malik Suarez, Micah Hodges, Mariana Harding, Bethany Stanley, Arnoldo Nash ...
64%Completion Rate
1
Complete the diagnostic program to get the data you need to start your stakeholder management journey.
The following report is a sample of what you will receive after
completing the CIO Business Vision program. Each report is
customized to the individual organization, highlighting the IT
department’s most pressing needs.
Measure Business Stakeholder Satisfaction
Highlight the Business Impact of IT Constraints
Prioritize Key Issues & Create an Improvement Roadmap
Build Action Plans to Manage Critical Stakeholders
YOUR JOURNEY STARTS HERE.
2
Measure Business Stakeholder
Satisfaction
Highlight the Business Impact of IT Constraints
Prioritize Key Issues & Create an Improvement
Roadmap
Build Action Plans to Manage Critical
Stakeholders
Once a year, take a step back from IT’s day-to-day operations and
look at the big picture.
Let business leaders be your advocates: demonstrate the impact of IT under-resourcing on business
results.
Cut through the noise: uncover the IT services that matter most to your
business leaders.
Understand satisfaction & needs by department, seniority,
and individual.
Understand your stakeholders’ satisfaction with and
needs from IT.
Evaluate project & work orders from both a capacity and execution
perspective.
Align your team behind achieving your vision, communicating the rationale behind your decisions.
Work with your most important and most dissatisfied stakeholders to
ensure their needs are met.
Build your strategy for managing & improving
IT services over the long term.
Use data to make the case for more IT resources or budget.
Prioritize quick wins to show your stakeholders that rapid
improvement is a priority.
Empower your team to build relationships with key stakeholders to make IT a trusted business partner.
1 2 3 4
Inside the ReportIT Satisfaction Scorecard / AurCorp
33
1
2
3
4
5
6
2Collect Business Feedback
Build the IT Strategy
Manage Stakeholders
Manage IT Performance
Improve IT Services
Communicate Success
1
5
2
6
3 4
Collect Business Feedback Measure business-leader satisfaction with IT and assess business needs.
Build the IT Strategy Prioritize key issues and create an improvement roadmap.
Manage Stakeholders Improve business leader relationships and ensure their needs are met.
Manage IT Performance Align IT leadership performance metrics with measurable business results.
Improve IT Services Execute planned IT improvement efforts with your team.
Communicate Success Provide ongoing updates to the business on value created by IT initiatives.
An Annual Program
Build a Data-Driven IT StrategyIT Satisfaction Scorecard / AurCorp
4
Brief the CEO & Critical Stakeholders• Meeting with your CEO and CFO should be an exercise in relationship building, especially
around IT’s dedication to enabling the business and satisfying stakeholders.
• The exact flow of the meeting will depend on your organization’s dynamics, the data, andyour preferences.
Getting Direction1. Communicate results to CEO/steering committees.• No matter how good or bad the results, they can be used to create commitment to action
and improvement. Coming prepared with an agenda or talk track and initial action planswill benefit the outcome of this meeting.
2. Get CEO direction on goals and objectives.• Ask the CEO what they want to see from your initiatives. This input should develop and
improve the initial action plans. Address how to prioritize stakeholders.
• If a capacity gap exists and you feel comfortable making the case, discuss capacity anddemand to get at what is feasible and what is not. Be prepared to discuss why you believea gap exists, how it can be closed, and the benefits of closing it.
3. Determine which other critical stakeholders to engage.• Determine which other stakeholders should be looped in.
Highlight Success Stories:…
…
…
…
…
…
Be Transparent in Identifying Challenges:…
…
…
Refle t on Action Plans and Integrate Improvements Into a Timeline:
1st Quarter Actions:
2nd Quarter Actions:
3rd Quarter Actions:
4th Quarter Actions:
Sample Tem
plate
GOAL
PROCESS
1. Collect & Share IT FeedbackIT Satisfaction Scorecard / AurCorp
5
PHASE 1 Understand the Business Context1.1 Review the business context.
1.2 Identify IT implications from the documented business context.
1.3 Group the IT implications into themes.
1.4 Define the IT strategy scope.
PHASE 2 Defi e the IT Target State 2.1 Create the IT mission and vision statements and identify IT guiding principles.
2.2 Define IT goals.
2.3 Indicate the target state IT maturity.
2.4 Identify target-state IT capabilities.
PHASE 3 Assess the IT Current State 3.1 Assess current IT capabilities.
3.2 Review MGD results.
3.2 Assess in-flight initiatives.
3.3 Identify relationship between current initiatives and capabilities.
3.4 Review current IT budget.
3.5 Conduct IT SWOT analysis.
3.6 Review CIO BV results.
3.7 Identify current-state maturity.
PHASE 4 Bridge the Gap and Create the Strategy 4.1 Assess the gaps between current- and
target-state capabilities.
4.2 Brainstorm initiatives to address the gaps in capabilities.
4.3 Create initiative profiles.
4.4 Identify IT strategy risks.
4.5 Identify required IT budget.
4.6 Sponsor check-in.
With demands for faster
change on a budget,
you need a dynamic
methodology that
helps IT achieve the
target state. Info-Tech
is here to help.
IT Strategy Methodology Target State
Business Context Vision/Mission Statements Target Maturity Ladder
Implications for IT IT Guiding Principles IT Capabilities
IT Strategy Scope IT Strategic Goals
Current State
Current Capabilities Current IT Budget Current Maturity Ladder
Management & Governance Diagnostic IT SWOT
Current Initiatives CIO Business Vision Diagnostic
Initiatives and Roadmap
Gap Assessment Prioritized Initiatives Communication Plan
Future IT Initiative Roadmap Refresh Plan
Projected IT Budget Strategy Risk Approval
1
2
3
2. Build the IT StrategyIT Satisfaction Scorecard / AurCorp
6
Sample Tem
plate
Start With a Plan:Communicate individual department results
Communicate IT goals
Identify business leader priorities and pain points
Bring Your Tools:Info-Tech IT Satisfaction Report Card
Info-Tech IT Capacity Report Card
Info-Tech Client Feedback Forms
Action plans (blank)
Department priorities poster
Mission, goal, and objectives
…
Develop a Timeline for Follow-Up Meetings:
1st Quarter Actions:
2nd Quarter Actions:
3rd Quarter Actions:
4th Quarter Actions:
Actively Manage Stakeholders• How you tackle meeting with business leaders will depend on how many there are and how many
are important to the CEO.
Build the Stakeholder Playbook1. Identify and prioritize stakeholders.• Use the discussion with the CEO as a starting point.
2. Decide who will be accountable for stakeholders.• The CIO shouldn’t be responsible for managing more than ten individual business stakeholders, so decide
who will.
• For organizations with an unwieldy number of stakeholders, consider using a tier system to group them.
3. Create a plan and regular meeting process.• Begin by reiterating the objective of the program: creating stakeholder satisfaction and driving business value.
• Use the department priorities poster to review results.
• Areas with very low scores, very high scores, or significant deviation from the business should be explored.Address neutral or negative feedback with a positive, client-facing attitude.
• Use the action plan templates to develop solutions.
4. Determine an on-going stakeholder management plan.• At minimum, follow up with each stakeholder six months after the survey. Create a program to ensure
this occurs.
GOAL
PROCESS
3. Manage StakeholdersIT Satisfaction Scorecard / AurCorp
7
Increase Accountability
• The best way to instill a culture of business satisfactionis through IT team accountability for results.
• Assign accountability for IT service satisfaction to IT teammembers or teams themselves, e.g. the service desk manageris accountable for the service desk satisfaction metric.
• Ensure that each accountable staff member is empoweredto make decisions and to take action to improve theirsatisfaction metric. Accountability can be sliced by businessunit or by system supported.
Align With Evaluations
• Include satisfaction metrics in the performance evaluations ofsenior managers, and consider their use for bonuses.
Get to Action
• Use Info-Tech project blueprints and toolkits to help you improvesatisfaction and results, as well as improve process maturity.
4. Manage IT PerformanceIT Satisfaction Scorecard / AurCorp
8
Build Your Key Initiative Plans
• Work with Info-Tech to improve your highest priorityIT services.
• Our Key Initiative Plans are designed to help IT leadersfocus on the most important and impactful initiatives toimprove their function.
• We provide you with tools and training to help yousucceed at key projects that are proven to increasebusiness satisfaction and enhance the capability of allkey roles.
Get the Help You Need
• For each key initiative, determine whether you preferguided assistance from an analyst, a one-week on-siteworkshop, or the tools to tackle it on your own.
5. Improve IT ServicesIT Satisfaction Scorecard / AurCorp
9
Sample Tem
plate
Highlight Success Stories:…
…
…
…
…
…
Be Transparent in Identifying Challenges:…
…
…
Refle t on Action Plans and Integrate Improvements Into a Timeline:
1st Quarter Actions:
2nd Quarter Actions:
3rd Quarter Actions:
4th Quarter Actions: Next Up: Start Next Year’s Business Feedback Exercise
Communicate to the Business• By this point you should have a clear understanding of a) business leader priorities and b)
commitments to action from IT teams.
• With this information you are ready to assemble business leaders and share IT’s improvementplan over the next year.
• This information should be communicated to all business leaders who were invited toparticipate in the survey.
Execute on Your Annual Plan1. Manage communication with quarterly business updates.• Soliciting feedback and not acting on it is as bad as not soliciting it at all, if not worse. Schedule
quarterly updates with the business to communicate progress.
• Prepare a timeline that highlights the milestones that were and will be achieved.
• Post results scorecards to keep them top of mind.
2. Six-month follow-up: Meet with all business leaders.• Depending on number of participants and quality of results, this may be conducted as one
meeting or a series.
• To keep business leaders engaged this meeting must be conducted within three months ofcompleting the survey.
GOAL
PROCESS
6. Communicate SuccessIT Satisfaction Scorecard / AurCorp
10
12
13
14
15
17
24
Table of Contents
IT Satisfaction Scorecard
IT Capacity Scorecard
Benchmarking
Additional Research
Satisfaction By Department
Satisfaction By IT Service
Anonymous Feedback 54
IT Satisfaction Scorecard / Empire State University
11
How to Use This ReportEnabling the business and satisfying stakeholders is THE mission of the IT department. The purpose of this annual report is to collect and present stakeholder feedback.
The report contains the following information:
Overall Stakeholder Satisfaction. See overall business satisfaction and across core IT services. This page shows which services are highest and lowest performing and what business priorities are. Use this information to prioritize key issues and create an improvement roadmap or IT Strategy.
Capacity Satisfaction. Highlight the business impact of IT constraints. This page demonstrates constraints on business units due to a lack of IT capacity. It covers constraint at a project level, work order level, and shadow IT. Use this information to direct, plan and budget for IT capacity.
Satisfaction by Department. Dive deeper into satisfaction and priorities for each individual Department within the organization. Understand the actual IT priorities and satisfaction levels of each key Department and read open-ended comments from respondents. Use this information to build action plans to manage critical stakeholders.
This report is the Jrst step in the stakeholder management process. We recommend sharing the report with your IT team, communicating priorities and the importance of stakeholder satisfaction. We also recommend sharing with your senior management team. Leadership understanding of IT commitment to stakeholder satisfaction and business leaders' priorities is critical. Look to leadership to Jnalize priorities, capacity, and budget. Finally, connect with individual stakeholders to understand their needs, ensuring ongoing communication and transparency.
This survey is designed to be completed annually, so if you complete it in a subsequent year, we treat the previous year’s survey results as an internal benchmark so you can chart your progress over time.
Happy trails!
The Info-Tech Team
Reading the IT Support Breakdown
The IT Support Breakdown categorizes respondents into three categories: supporters, neutral respondents, and detractors. Each dot represents 10% of all respondents. The IT Support Score evaluates the proportion of respondents who are satisfied with IT compared to those who are dissatisfied. A positive score indicates more supporters than detractors, while red indicates the opposite.
DetractorsScored 1 - 6
NeutralScored 7
SupportersScored 8 - 10
IT Support Score = Supporters - Detractors
IT SatisfactionScorecard
74%
IT Satisfaction
Up 14%from last year
NET PROMOTER SCORE: 44%
72%
IT Value
Up 11%from last year
NET PROMOTER SCORE: 27%
Business Satisfaction and Importance for Core ServicesThe core services of IT are important when determining what IT should focus on. The most important services with the lowestsatisfaction offer the largest area of improvement for IT to drive business value.
Satisfaction Importance
Campus Wi-Fi Satisfaction with access, reliability, and speed of Wi-FiUp 8%from last year
4TH
CampusInfrastructure
Satisfaction with reliable networks, telephone, email,, excluding Wi-Fi
Up 8%from last year
2ND
Service Requests &Enhancements
Satisfaction with repairs, changes & improvements toexisting technology
trendingunavailable
8TH
IT Support Centre Satisfaction with the IT Support Centre investigatingand resolving end user issues & problems)
Up 7%from last year
5TH
IT Policies Satisfaction with policy design and enforcementaround security, governance, etc...
Up 9%from last year
11TH
Faculty and Sta2Devices
Satisfaction with provided desktop, laptop, tablet &mobile devices
Down 4%from last year
13TH
ClassroomTechnology
Satisfaction with projectors, podiums, documentcameras, audio, etc ...
Up 9%from last year
6TH
Project Management Satisfaction with large IT projects or institution wideprojects & initiatives
Up 14%from last year
9TH
IT InnovationLeadership
Satisfaction with providing opportunities for innovationand innovation leadership to improve the institution
Up 14%from last year
10TH
Courseware andLearning ManagementTechnology
Satisfaction with virtual library, lecture capture, etc...Up 7%from last year
7TH
AdministrativeApplications
Satisfaction with PeopleSoft and other administrativeapplications used by faculty and staff for running theinstitution
trendingunavailable
1ST
Data Quality Satisfaction with providing reliable and accurate data0%from last year
3RD
Analytical Capabilityand Reports
Satisfaction with effective standard reports, customreports capability, and the ability to generate businessinsights
Up 13%from last year
11TH
82%
80%
77%
74%
73%
73%
71%
70%
66%
66%
59%
58%
55%
Business Satisfaction
IT Satisfaction Scorecard / Empire State University
12
% Communicates Effectively
% Executes Requests
% Understands Needs45
% Trains Effectively64 Satisfaction with training quality and timing.
trendingunavailable
Rela
tions
hip
Remote/Mobile DeviceAccess Friction isacceptable
6464% aboveaverage
% AGREE
RegulatoryCompliance-drivenFriction is acceptable
5959% aboveaverage
% AGREE
Office/DesktopSecurity Friction isacceptable
5555% aboveaverage
% AGREE
Data Access Friction isacceptable
% AGREE4545% aboveaverage
Security Friction
Satisfaction with the way IT executes your requests and meets your needs.
trendingunavailable
Satisfaction with IT's understanding of your needs.
trendingunavailable
Satisfaction with IT communication.
trending unavailable
64
64
Satisfaction with the IT department and its ability to support your needs
Satisfaction that IT provides high value relative to your perception of cost and staffing
Showing 12 of 31 Departments
IT Capacity ScorecardCapacityNeedsConstraintTo what extent is your groupconstrained and prevented fromreaching your strategic goals byIT Capacity?
Distribution 64%
Average
Capacity Constraint by Department
PensionServices
100%
Faculty of Law
80%
HumanResources
80%
StrategicProcurement
Services
80%
School ofRehabilitation
Therapy
80%
Housing &Hospitality
Services
75%
Campus Security
50%
School ofNursing
50%
School of Urbanand Regional
Planning
50%
ResearchServices
40%
School ofBusiness
30%
HealthCounselling &
DisabilityServices
20%
Shadow ITOverall Shadow ITTo what extent do you lookexternally and purchase ITservices & applications withoutcorporate IT involvement, due toa lack of internal IT capacity?
Distribution 63%
Average
Shadow IT by Department
Biology
100%
School ofNursing
100%
School ofRehabilitation
Therapy
100%
School ofGraduateStudies
90%
Physics
90%
School ofBusiness
90%
OKce of the VPFinance &
Administration
30%
OKce of theProvost & VP
Academic
27%
OKce of thePrincipal
25%
HealthCounselling &
DisabilityServices
10%
StrategicProcurement
Services
10%
Audit Services
10%
Projects70% Capacity
SatisfactionSatisfaction with the ability to get IT capacityto complete projects.--NET PROMOTER SCORE: 15%
70% Ability to DeliverE2ectively
Satisfaction with completed IT projectsability to meet your business needs.--NET PROMOTER SCORE: 20%
Capacity Satisfaction by Department
Division ofStudent Affairs
N/A
PensionServices
90%
Library System
80%
OKce of the VPFinance &
Administration
77%
OKce of theVice-Principal
Research
77%
Faculty ofEducation
70%
School of Music
70%
School ofBusiness
70%
UniversityRegistrar
65%
Faculty ofEngineering &
Applied Science
62%
OKce of thePrincipal
60%
School ofRehabilitation
Therapy
20%
Work Orders79% Capacity
SatisfactionSatisfaction with the ability to get IT capacityto complete Work Orders--NET PROMOTER SCORE: 59%
75% Ability to DeliverE2ectively
Satisfaction with completed IT Work Ordersability to meet your business needs--NET PROMOTER SCORE: 38%
Capacity Satisfaction by Department
OKce of the VPFinance &
Administration
93%
School of Music
90%
School ofBusiness
90%
Division ofStudent Affairs
90%
OKce of theVice-Principal
Research
87%
PensionServices
80%
OKce of thePrincipal
80%
Library System
80%
UniversityRegistrar
75%
Faculty ofEducation
75%
School ofRehabilitation
Therapy
70%
Faculty ofEngineering &
Applied Science
63%
IT Satisfaction Scorecard / Empire State University
13
Remote/Mobile DeviceAccess Friction isacceptable--
Of/c e/DesktopSecurity Friction isacceptable--
RegulatoryCompliance-drivenFriction is acceptable--
Data Access Friction isacceptable
--
Security Friction
Benchmarking74%
IT Satisfaction2% below averageINDUSTRY AVERAGE: 76%28TH PERCENTILE
72%
IT Value4% below averageINDUSTRY AVERAGE: 76%26TH PERCENTILE
IT Budget as % of Revenue
0% BENCHMARKING NOT AVAILABLE
IT Sta/ as % of Users
0.5% 0.5% below averageINDUSTRY AVERAGE: 1%50TH PERCENTILE
Satisfaction
Shadow IT Use of Shadow IT: procurement of IT services andapplications without IT involvement
26% aboveaverage
CapacityConstraint
Satisfaction with responsiveness and effectiveness ofservice desk. 6% above average
63%
64%Capa
city
TrainsE2ectively Satisfaction with training quality and timing. --
UnderstandsNeeds Satisfaction with IT's understanding of your needs. 1% below average
CommunicatesE2ectively Satisfaction with IT communication. 1% below average
ExecutesRequests
Satisfaction with the way IT executes your requests andmeets your needs. 6% below average
N/A
71%
71%
66%
Rela
tions
hip
Business Satisfaction and Importance for Core ServicesThe core services of IT are important when determining what IT should focus on. The most important services with the lowestsatisfaction offer the largest area of improvement for IT to drive business value.
Satisfaction Percentile
Campus Wi-Fi Satisfaction with access, reliability, and speed of Wi-Fi 7% above industry 76TH
CampusInfrastructure
Satisfaction with reliable networks, telephone, email, excluding Wi-Fi 4% above industry 62ND
Service Requests &Enhancements
Satisfaction with repairs, changes & improvements toexisting technology 1% below industry 40TH
IT Support Centre Satisfaction with the IT Support Centre investigatingand resolving end user issues & problems) 6% below industry 15TH
IT Policies Satisfaction with policy design and enforcementaround security, governance, etc...
aligned withindustry
46TH
Faculty and Sta2Devices
Satisfaction with provided desktop, laptop, tablet &mobile devices 3% below industry 21ST
ClassroomTechnology
Satisfaction with projectors, podiums, documentcameras, audio, etc ... 3% below industry 22ND
Project Management Satisfaction with large IT projects or institution wideprojects & initiatives 2% below industry 32ND
IT InnovationLeadership
Satisfaction with providing opportunities for innovationand innovation leadership to improve the institution 2% below industry 39TH
Courseware andLearning ManagementTechnology
Satisfaction with virtual library, lecture capture, etc... 7% below industry 13TH
AdministrativeApplications
Satisfaction with PeopleSoft and other administrativeapplications used by faculty and staff for running theinstitution
13% below industry 4TH
Data Quality Satisfaction with providing reliable and accurate data 13% below industry 8TH
Analytical Capabilityand Reports
Satisfaction with effective standard reports, customreports capability, and the ability to generate businessinsights
12% below industry 7TH
82%
80%
77%
74%
73%
73%
71%
70%
66%
66%
59%
58%
55%
Business Satisfaction
IT Satisfaction Scorecard / Empire State University
Education n=71
14
Additional ResearchIT Strategy
Rapidly Develop a Visual ITStrategyBreak the cycle of outdated and unread IT strategies.
Download Blueprint
Become a Strategic CIOCreate a personal development plan to take your career to the next level.
Download Blueprint
De1ne the Business Context forStrategic IT InitiativesEnsure your IT initiatives are based on an understanding of organizationalobjectives.
Download Blueprint
Plan & Execute a DigitalTransformationTake a step closer to your end customers by creating a customer-centricdigital strategy.
Download Blueprint
IT Performance Management
Develop Meaningful ServiceMetrics to Ensure Business andUser SatisfactionReinforce service orientation in your IT organization by ensuring your ITmetrics generate value-driven resource behavior.
Download Blueprint
Maximize Business Value From ITThrough Bene1ts RealizationEmbed beneMts realization into your governance process to prioritize ITspend and conMrm the value of IT.
Download Blueprint
Transform IT Into a Value Creator WithBusiness Relationship ManagementLeverage a deep knowledge of the business to become an innovativeand strategic partner.
Download Blueprint
Build and Deliver an Optimized IT UpdatePresentationShow IT’s value and relevance by dropping the technical jargon andspeaking to the business in their terms.
Download Blueprint
Manage Stakeholder RelationsAs a CIO, you are responsible for addressing a wide variety ofcompeting demands of many different stakeholders
Download Blueprint
Business RelationshipManagement
IT Satisfaction Scorecard / Empire State University
15
Additional ResearchIT Service ImprovementSatisfying the needs of the business means effective delivery of IT services that matter most. Consult Info-Tech'sresearch library to start improvement efforts for your most critical services. Each link will take you a project toolkitdesigned to help you kick-start the initiative and make real improvements quickly. Don't try to improve everythingat once -- focus on what matters.
66%Satisfaction
10thImportance
IT Innovation Leadership
Kick Start IT Led Business Innovation
Become a Transformational CIO
Sustain & Grow Innovation Maturity in YourEnterprise
73%Satisfaction
11thImportance
IT Policies
Take the Pain Out of IT Policies
Take Control of Compliance to Conquer EveryAudit
66%Satisfaction
7thImportance
Courseware and LearningManagement Technology
Evaluate Education Learning ManagementSystems
Evaluate Campus Management Technology
58%Satisfaction
3rdImportance
Data Quality
Restore Trust in Your Data Using a BusinessAligned Data Quality Management Approach
Establish a Business Aligned Data ManagementPractice
Modernize Data Architecture for MeasurableBusiness Results
55%Satisfaction
11thImportance
Analytical Capability andReports
Build a Next Generation BI with a Game ChangingBI Strategy
Leverage Big Data By Starting Small
59%Satisfaction
1stImportance
AdministrativeApplications
Visualize Your Application Portfolio Strategy witha Value Driven Roadmap
Streamline Application Maintenance
Govern & Manage an Enterprise SoftwareImplementation
77%Satisfaction
8thImportance
Service Requests &Enhancements
Design Build a User Facing Service Catalog
Create a Service Management Roadmap
Establish a Right Sized Release & DeploymentManagement Process
70%Satisfaction
9thImportance
Project Management
Establish an Effective PMO for IT
Optimize Project Intake Approval & Prioritization
Grow Your Own PPM Solution
Tailor Project Management Processes to Fit YourProjects
82%Satisfaction
4thImportance
Campus Wi-Fi
Own the Cloud Strategy & Action Plan
Modernize the Network
Modernize Enterprise Storage
73%Satisfaction
13thImportance
Faculty and Sta2 Devices
Build an End User Computing Strategy
Pave the Road to UniMed Endpoint Management
74%Satisfaction
5thImportance
IT Support Centre
Standardize the Service Desk
Build a Continual Improvement Plan for theService Desk
IT Satisfaction Scorecard / Empire State University
16
School of Urban and Regional Planning
80%
SATISFACTION
Top Priorities
1 Faculty and StaffDevices
2 AdministrativeApplications
3 Campus Infrastructure
50%CAPACITY
CONSTRAINT
Research Services
80%
SATISFACTION
Top Priorities
1 Campus Infrastructure
2 AdministrativeApplications
3 IT Support Centre
40%CAPACITY
CONSTRAINT
O0ce of the Principal
80%
SATISFACTION
Top Priorities
1 Campus Infrastructure
2 Campus Wi-Fi
3 IT Innovation Leadership
55%CAPACITY CONSTRAINT
Library System
80%
SATISFACTION
Top Priorities
1 Campus Infrastructure
2 AdministrativeApplications
3 Campus Wi-Fi
60%CAPACITY
CONSTRAINT
Division of Student A/airs
80%
SATISFACTION
Top Priorities
1 AdministrativeApplications
2 Project Management
3 Courseware andLearning Management
70%CAPACITY CONSTRAINT
O0ce of the VP Finance &Administration
77%
SATISFACTION
Top Priorities
1 AdministrativeApplications
2 Campus Infrastructure
3 Data Quality
60%CAPACITY
CONSTRAINT
Faculty of Education
75%
SATISFACTION
Top Priorities
1 Classroom Technology
2 Courseware andLearning Management
3 Service Requests &Enhancements
75%CAPACITY CONSTRAINT
School of Business
75%
SATISFACTION
Top Priorities
1 Campus Infrastructure
2 Campus Wi-Fi
3 AdministrativeApplications
30%CAPACITY CONSTRAINT
Biology
70%
SATISFACTION
Top Priorities
1 IT Support Centre
2 Courseware andLearning Management
3 Campus Infrastructure
60%CAPACITY
CONSTRAINT
Faculty of Arts and Science
70%
SATISFACTION
Top Priorities
1 Campus Infrastructure
2 AdministrativeApplications
3 Data Quality
65%CAPACITY CONSTRAINT
School of Nursing
70%
SATISFACTION
Top Priorities
1 IT Support Centre
2 Classroom Technology
3 Campus Wi-Fi
50%CAPACITY
CONSTRAINT
Audit Services
70%
SATISFACTION
Top Priorities
1 IT Policies
2 Data Quality
3 AdministrativeApplications
50%CAPACITY
CONSTRAINT
IT Satisfaction Scorecard / Empire State University
Satisfaction By Department
17
Remote/Mobile DeviceAccess Friction isacceptable--
Of/c e/DesktopSecurity Friction isacceptable--
RegulatoryCompliance-drivenFriction is acceptable--
Data Access Friction isacceptable
--
Security Friction
80%
Satisfaction6% above organizationORG. AVERAGE: 74%
77%
Value5% above organizationORG. AVERAGE: 72%
Projects
60% CapacitySatisfaction
10% below organizationNET PROMOTER SCORE: -100%
60% Ability to DeliverE/ectively
10% below organizationNET PROMOTER SCORE: -100%
Work Orders
95% CapacitySatisfaction
16% above organizationNET PROMOTER SCORE: 100%
90% Ability to DeliverE/ectively
15% above organizationNET PROMOTER SCORE: 100%
Very ConstrainedNot Constrained
Capacity Constraint
Somewhat Constrained
70%
ORG: 64% HighLow
Shadow IT
Medium
90%
ORG: 63%
Satisfaction
TrainsE2ectively Satisfaction with training quality and timing. --
CommunicatesE2ectively Satisfaction with IT communication. 4% below
organization
UnderstandsNeeds Satisfaction with IT's understanding of your needs. 8% below
organization
ExecutesRequests
Satisfaction with the way IT executes your requests andmeets your needs.
3% beloworganization
N/A
67%
63%
63%
Rela
tions
hip
Business Satisfaction and Importance for Core ServicesThe core services of IT are important when determining what IT should focus on. The most important services with the lowestsatisfaction offer the largest area of improvement for IT to drive business value.
Satisfaction Importance
Service Requests &Enhancements
Satisfaction with repairs, changes & improvements toexisting technology
16% aboveorganization
5TH
Faculty and Sta2Devices
Satisfaction with provided desktop, laptop, tablet &mobile devices
17% aboveorganization
7TH
IT Support Centre Satisfaction with the IT Support Centre investigatingand resolving end user issues & problems)
16% aboveorganization
4TH
CampusInfrastructure
Satisfaction with reliable networks, telephone, email, excluding Wi-Fi
aligned withorganization
2ND
ClassroomTechnology
Satisfaction with projectors, podiums, documentcameras, audio, etc ...
6% aboveorganization
9TH
Campus Wi-Fi Satisfaction with access, reliability, and speed of Wi-Fi5% beloworganization
8TH
IT InnovationLeadership
Satisfaction with providing opportunities for innovationand innovation leadership to improve the institution
4% aboveorganization
13TH
IT Policies Satisfaction with policy design and enforcementaround security, governance, etc...
3% beloworganization
11TH
Courseware andLearning ManagementTechnology
Satisfaction with virtual library, lecture capture, etc...4% aboveorganization
10TH
Project Management Satisfaction with large IT projects or institution wideprojects & initiatives
10% beloworganization
11TH
Data Quality Satisfaction with providing reliable and accurate data5% beloworganization
3RD
Analytical Capabilityand Reports
Satisfaction with effective standard reports, customreports capability, and the ability to generate businessinsights
2% beloworganization
5TH
AdministrativeApplications
Satisfaction with PeopleSoft and other administrativeapplications used by faculty and staff for running theinstitution
12% beloworganization
1ST
93%
90%
90%
80%
77%
77%
70%
70%
70%
60%
53%
53%
47%
Business Satisfaction
IT Satisfaction Scorecard / Empire State University
School of Graduate Studies Priorities
Overall Satisfaction and value are key indicators of the overall impression of the IT Department. These metrics let the IT leader determine at a glance if they are meeting the needs of the business.
Section Responses: 5 | Total Responses: 59
18
Satisfaction: 80% Value: 77%
What is your top suggestion for how ITS can change or improve to better meet your needs?
Delia Grimes: Re-instate repair service for units beyond warranty.
Analytical Capability and ReportsSatisfaction: 53% Rank: 5th
What is your top suggestion for how The University could better meet your data, reporting and analyticsneeds?
Delia Grimes: Resources have been dedicated in developing reports for Finance. Need an equivalent for the HR and Student systems. Not proficient in query manager to extract data without some tweaking.
Isiah Huber: I am dissatisfied with the information that I obtain from when tracking my spending from research accounts. It should be much easier to find out how and which graduate students have been paid from which research account.
Administrative ApplicationsSatisfaction: 47% Rank: 1st
What is the greatest area of improvement that could be made to administration applications to better support the University?
Delia Grimes: Reports for HR and Student that will eliminate the need to build queries
IT Satisfaction Scorecard / Empire State University
School of Graduate Studies Feedback
Overall Satisfaction
Feedback Provided by Linda Lam, Kim McAuley,
Section Responses: 5 | Total Responses: 59
19
Remote/Mobile DeviceAccess Friction isacceptable--
Of/c e/DesktopSecurity Friction isacceptable--
RegulatoryCompliance-drivenFriction is acceptable--
Data Access Friction isacceptable
--
Security Friction
77%
Satisfaction3% above organizationORG. AVERAGE: 74%
70%
Value2% below organizationORG. AVERAGE: 72%
Projects
77% CapacitySatisfaction
7% above organizationNET PROMOTER SCORE: 33%
77% Ability to DeliverE/ectively
7% above organizationNET PROMOTER SCORE: 33%
Work Orders
93% CapacitySatisfaction
14% above organizationNET PROMOTER SCORE: 100%
100% Ability to DeliverE/ectively
25% above organizationNET PROMOTER SCORE: 100%
Very ConstrainedNot Constrained
Capacity Constraint
Somewhat Constrained
60%
ORG: 64% HighLow
Shadow IT
Medium
30%
ORG: 63%
Satisfaction
TrainsE2ectively Satisfaction with training quality and timing. --
CommunicatesE2ectively Satisfaction with IT communication. 16% above
organization
UnderstandsNeeds Satisfaction with IT's understanding of your needs. 12% above
organization
ExecutesRequests
Satisfaction with the way IT executes your requests andmeets your needs.
7% aboveorganization
N/A
87%
83%
73%
Rela
tions
hip
Business Satisfaction and Importance for Core ServicesThe core services of IT are important when determining what IT should focus on. The most important services with the lowestsatisfaction offer the largest area of improvement for IT to drive business value.
Satisfaction Importance
Campus Wi-Fi Satisfaction with access, reliability, and speed of Wi-Fi18% aboveorganization
6TH
CampusInfrastructure
Satisfaction with reliable networks, telephone, email, excluding Wi-Fi
20% aboveorganization
1ST
Faculty and Sta2Devices
Satisfaction with provided desktop, laptop, tablet &mobile devices
27% aboveorganization
13TH
IT Support Centre Satisfaction with the IT Support Centre investigatingand resolving end user issues & problems)
26% aboveorganization
8TH
Service Requests &Enhancements
Satisfaction with repairs, changes & improvements toexisting technology
18% aboveorganization
12TH
IT InnovationLeadership
Satisfaction with providing opportunities for innovationand innovation leadership to improve the institution
11% aboveorganization
7TH
Project Management Satisfaction with large IT projects or institution wideprojects & initiatives
7% aboveorganization
8TH
IT Policies Satisfaction with policy design and enforcementaround security, governance, etc...
aligned withorganization
5TH
AdministrativeApplications
Satisfaction with PeopleSoft and other administrativeapplications used by faculty and staff for running theinstitution
14% aboveorganization
1ST
ClassroomTechnology
Satisfaction with projectors, podiums, documentcameras, audio, etc ...
1% beloworganization
4TH
Courseware andLearning ManagementTechnology
Satisfaction with virtual library, lecture capture, etc...4% aboveorganization
8TH
Data Quality Satisfaction with providing reliable and accurate data5% aboveorganization
3RD
Analytical Capabilityand Reports
Satisfaction with effective standard reports, customreports capability, and the ability to generate businessinsights
5% beloworganization
11TH
100%
100%
100%
100%
95%
77%
77%
73%
73%
70%
70%
63%
50%
Business Satisfaction
IT Satisfaction Scorecard / Empire State University
Of/c e of the VP Finance & Administration Priorities
Overall Satisfaction and value are key indicators of the overall impression of the IT Department.These metrics let the IT leader determine at a glance if they are meeting the needs of the business.
Section Responses: 3 | Total Responses: 59
20
Satisfaction: 77% Value: 70%
What is your top suggestion for how ITS can change or improve to better meet your needs?
Alfonso Dillon: Resource admin system sustainment to a level to meet business needs. Recognizing that this is Difficult in a resource constrained environment, are there other activities that can be curtailed?
Danial Nguyen: ITS could set performance targets based on benchmarks for comparable organizations for cost and service levels, and then publish regular updates on how well they're doing. That way they would begin to increase their credibility on campus.
Analytical Capability and ReportsSatisfaction: 50% Rank: 11th
What is your top suggestion for how The University could better meet your data, reporting and analytics needs?
Candace Estrada: E-procurement.
Alfonso Dillon: reporting tools required for student and HR
Danial Nguyen: Improving the reporting from Peoplesoft
Administrative ApplicationsSatisfaction: 73% Rank: 1st
What is the greatest area of improvement that could be made to administration applications to better support the University?
Candace Estrada: Workflow functionality in PeopleSoft should be made operational.
Alfonso Dillon: Due to resource constraints in administrative application support, There has been no ability to enable system enhancements which leaves significant opportunities untapped.
Danial Nguyen: reporting for users
General QuestionsIf you have observed any improvements in the effectiveness of ITS in the past 3 years, what would they be?
Candace Estrada: The PPO and ASSC have provided a much more transparent process for identifying and prioritizing administrative system needs.
Alfonso Dillon: The exchange and Office 365 moves are significant in moving the University to one platform and in increasing efficiency. Providing IT support across campus is also a key development.
If you could recommend one change that the CIO could make to improve how ITS is regarded within the Queen’s community, what would that change be?
Alfonso Dillon: In general ITS is well perceived across campus given the high availability of systems and some of the innovative changes. The support for administrative systems isn't what it should be in such a technology reliant environment.
Danial Nguyen: Introduce rigorous service level standards and cost information, and report regularly on them
IT Satisfaction Scorecard / Empire State University
Of/c e of the VP Finance & Administration Feedback
Overall Satisfaction
Feedback Provided by Donna Janiec, Caroline Davis, Kim Murphy,
Section Responses: 3 | Total Responses: 59
21
Remote/Mobile DeviceAccess Friction isacceptable--
Of/c e/DesktopSecurity Friction isacceptable--
RegulatoryCompliance-drivenFriction is acceptable--
Data Access Friction isacceptable
--
Security Friction
75%
Satisfaction1% above organizationORG. AVERAGE: 74%
75%
Value3% above organizationORG. AVERAGE: 72%
Projects
70% CapacitySatisfaction
aligned with organizationNET PROMOTER SCORE: 0%
70% Ability to DeliverE/ectively
aligned with organizationNET PROMOTER SCORE: 0%
Work Orders
90% CapacitySatisfaction
11% above organizationNET PROMOTER SCORE: 100%
85% Ability to DeliverE/ectively
10% above organizationNET PROMOTER SCORE: 100%
Very ConstrainedNot Constrained
Capacity Constraint
Somewhat Constrained
30%
ORG: 64% HighLow
Shadow IT
Medium
90%
ORG: 63%
Satisfaction
TrainsE2ectively Satisfaction with training quality and timing. --
CommunicatesE2ectively Satisfaction with IT communication. 14% above
organization
UnderstandsNeeds Satisfaction with IT's understanding of your needs. 9% above
organization
ExecutesRequests
Satisfaction with the way IT executes your requests andmeets your needs.
9% aboveorganization
N/A
85%
80%
75%
Rela
tions
hip
Business Satisfaction and Importance for Core ServicesThe core services of IT are important when determining what IT should focus on. The most important services with the lowestsatisfaction offer the largest area of improvement for IT to drive business value.
Satisfaction Importance
Service Requests &Enhancements
Satisfaction with repairs, changes & improvements toexisting technology
11% aboveorganization
6TH
CampusInfrastructure
Satisfaction with reliable networks, telephone, email, excluding Wi-Fi
5% aboveorganization
1ST
IT Support Centre Satisfaction with the IT Support Centre investigatingand resolving end user issues & problems)
11% aboveorganization
10TH
Data Quality Satisfaction with providing reliable and accurate data22% aboveorganization
4TH
Campus Wi-Fi Satisfaction with access, reliability, and speed of Wi-Fi2% beloworganization
2ND
AdministrativeApplications
Satisfaction with PeopleSoft and other administrativeapplications used by faculty and staff for running theinstitution
16% aboveorganization
3RD
Analytical Capabilityand Reports
Satisfaction with effective standard reports, customreports capability, and the ability to generate businessinsights
15% aboveorganization
11TH
Project Management Satisfaction with large IT projects or institution wideprojects & initiatives
aligned withorganization
7TH
IT InnovationLeadership
Satisfaction with providing opportunities for innovationand innovation leadership to improve the institution
1% beloworganization
7TH
IT Policies Satisfaction with policy design and enforcementaround security, governance, etc...
8% beloworganization
5TH
Courseware andLearning ManagementTechnology
Satisfaction with virtual library, lecture capture, etc...16% beloworganization
9TH
Faculty and Sta2Devices
Satisfaction with provided desktop, laptop, tablet &mobile devices
33% beloworganization
12TH
ClassroomTechnology
Satisfaction with projectors, podiums, documentcameras, audio, etc ...
41% beloworganization
13TH
88%
85%
85%
80%
80%
75%
70%
70%
65%
65%
50%
40%
30%
Business Satisfaction
IT Satisfaction Scorecard / Empire State University
School of Business PrioritiesOverall Satisfaction and value are key indicators of the overall impression of the IT Department.These metrics let the IT leader determine at a glance if they are meeting the needs of the business.
Section Responses: 7 | Total Responses: 59
22
Satisfaction: 75% Value: 75%
What is your top suggestion for how ITS can change or improve to better meet your needs?
Kendrick Shaffer: Allow those departments with external IT staff who have parallel skill sets to ITS staff to assist or perform some of the same functions to expedite processes.
IT Innovation LeadershipSatisfaction: 65% Rank: 7th
What is your top suggestion for how technology can be utilized to innovate, transform and support the University mission?
Kendrick Shaffer: What is the University mission?
Classroom TechnologySatisfaction: 30% Rank: 13th
What is the most important opportunity for ITServices to better meet teaching and learning support needs?
Kendrick Shaffer: The implementation of D2L a major step in achieving a sound course delivery platform but the challenge will be fostering Faculty adoption and using the suite of tools effectively. It is essential to keep the students' perspective in mind.
General QuestionsIf you have observed any improvements in the effectiveness of ITS in the past 3 years, what would they be?
Kendrick Shaffer: I find that all areas of ITS have improved greatly in terms of responsiveness, execution, organization and listening to the constituents. There has been a commitment to foster collaboration across the major departments of the University which has allowed for a greater understanding and appreciation of the differences and similarities across Campus.
If you could recommend one change that the CIO could make to improve how ITS is regarded within the Queen’s community, what would that change be?
Kendrick Shaffer The ITS website could use an overhaul and the ordering site should be reinstated.
IT Satisfaction Scorecard / Empire State University
School of Business Feedback
Overall Satisfaction
Feedback Provided by Roger Boyes,
Section Responses: 7 | Total Responses: 59
23
Classroom Technology Satisfaction byDepartmentThe following charts rank Departments from under-served to over-served for this core service. This chart allows you to see the spread of satisfaction andthe Service Gap for each Department related to this core service so you can make an informed decision on aligning resources
Department RankService Gap Score Service Gap ScoresSatisfaction - Importance < 0
When importance outweighs satisfaction, Departments arebeing under-serviced. The larger the gap, the greater thedifference between satisfaction and importance. Aim to closeservice gaps to increase the effectiveness in theseDepartments.
Satisfaction - Importance > 0
When satisfaction outweighs importance, Departments aresatisMed with this speciMc core service relative to theimportance ranking. There may be room to reallocateresources, but be sure to maintain high satisfaction andimprove medium to low satisfaction in the long-term.
Rank ScoresHighest Importance
This core services was ranked between 1st and 4th mostimportant for the Department.
Medium Importance
This core services was ranked between 5th and 9th mostimportant for the Department.
Low Importance
This core services was ranked 10th or lower most importantfor the Department.
School of Urban and Regi…
Physics
Athletics & Recreation
School of Nursing
Faculty of Education
Languages, Literatures an…
Campus Security
Human Resources
School of Graduate Studies
Pension Services
O+ce of the VicePrincipal…
Faculty of Health Sciences
4
3
2
2
1
1
10
13
9
11
9
13
-37%
-35%
-22%
-22%
-15%
-10%
39%
42%
44%
47%
49%
55%
IT Satisfaction Scorecard / Empire State University
24
Courseware and Learning ManagementTechnology Satisfaction by ...The following charts rank Departments from under-served to over-served for this core service. This chart allows you to see the spread of satisfaction andthe Service Gap for each Department related to this core service so you can make an informed decision on aligning resources
Department RankService Gap Score Service Gap ScoresSatisfaction - Importance < 0
When importance outweighs satisfaction, Departments arebeing under-serviced. The larger the gap, the greater thedifference between satisfaction and importance. Aim to closeservice gaps to increase the effectiveness in theseDepartments.
Satisfaction - Importance > 0
When satisfaction outweighs importance, Departments aresatisMed with this speciMc core service relative to theimportance ranking. There may be room to reallocateresources, but be sure to maintain high satisfaction andimprove medium to low satisfaction in the long-term.
Rank ScoresHighest Importance
This core services was ranked between 1st and 4th mostimportant for the Department.
Medium Importance
This core services was ranked between 5th and 9th mostimportant for the Department.
Low Importance
This core services was ranked 10th or lower most importantfor the Department.
Faculty of Arts and Science
Biology
Faculty of Education
Faculty of Law
School of Rehabilitation T…
School of Urban and Regi…
Athletics & Recreation
Housing & Hospitality Ser…
O+ce of Advancement
Campus Security
Languages, Literatures an…
Research Services
6
2
1
1
3
7
11
12
13
13
12
13
-37%
-32%
-30%
-28%
-15%
-14%
47%
55%
59%
62%
65%
72%
IT Satisfaction Scorecard / Empire State University
25
Administrative Applications Satisfaction byDepartmentThe following charts rank Departments from under-served to over-served for this core service. This chart allows you to see the spread of satisfaction andthe Service Gap for each Department related to this core service so you can make an informed decision on aligning resources
Department RankService Gap Score Service Gap ScoresSatisfaction - Importance < 0
When importance outweighs satisfaction, Departments arebeing under-serviced. The larger the gap, the greater thedifference between satisfaction and importance. Aim to closeservice gaps to increase the effectiveness in theseDepartments.
Satisfaction - Importance > 0
When satisfaction outweighs importance, Departments aresatisMed with this speciMc core service relative to theimportance ranking. There may be room to reallocateresources, but be sure to maintain high satisfaction andimprove medium to low satisfaction in the long-term.
Rank ScoresHighest Importance
This core services was ranked between 1st and 4th mostimportant for the Department.
Medium Importance
This core services was ranked between 5th and 9th mostimportant for the Department.
Low Importance
This core services was ranked 10th or lower most importantfor the Department.
Languages, Literatures an…
Physics
Human Resources
School of Music
Division of Student A*airs
School of Graduate Studies
Faculty of Education
Strategic Procurement Se…
O+ce of the Provost & VP…
Faculty of Health Sciences
Campus Security
O+ce of the Principal
2
4
1
1
1
1
4
4
5
5
11
12
-72%
-57%
-56%
-50%
-50%
-48%
2%
3%
13%
17%
47%
48%
IT Satisfaction Scorecard / Empire State University
26