it framework in hungary pierre l. siklos wlu & viessmann research centre waterloo on canada
TRANSCRIPT
IT Framework in Hungary
Pierre L. SiklosWLU & Viessmann Research
CentreWaterloo ON CANADA
Institutional requirementsInstrument independenceEffective monetary policy instrumentAccountabilityDisclosureA floating exchange rateJoint responsibilityHarmony with fiscal policyPublic supportWell developed financial system
IT Desiderata: part I
IT Desiderata: Part II
Economic requirementsChoice of an appropriate price indexSelection of a width and horizon,and symmetry for the inflationtargetAdequate knowledge of thetransmission mechanism ofmonetary policyProvision of inflation forecastsAdequate measurement and timelyarrival of economic information
How Gradual?
Table 1 Inflation targets
Target rates Reference period Date adopted
7% ±1 percentage point December 2001 June 2001
4.5% ±1 percentage point December 2002 June 2001
3.5% ±1 percentage point December 2003 December 2001
3.5% ±1 percentage point December 2004 October 2002
4% ±1 percentage point December 2005 October 2003
3.5% ±1 percentage point December 2006 November 2004
3% in 2007
IT in Hungary: Current State of Play
Institutional conditions: are they met? Status (ca. 2002) Status (ca. 2006)
Instrument independence? YES YESEffective policy instrument? YES YESAccountability? YES YES Adequate disclosure? YES YESExchange rate regime? YES ?Joint responsibility for YES ?monetary policy? Fiscal-monetary harmony? YES (in principle) ?
IT in Hungary: Current State of PlayPrice index for targeting? CPI inflation
“According to the findings of research carried by MNB staff, the optimal long-term level of inflation falls into the 2.3%–3.2% target
range” Width, horizon, symmetryof target bands? ±1% around a specified
mid-point of target bandSufficient knowledgeabout transmissionmechanism?
Dependent on choice ofexchange rate regime
Role of inflation forecast? Distribution of risks
around some centraltendency
Measurement, timelinessissues?
Largely met
Inflation
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
CPI inflationInflation objectiveReference value for inflationInflation expectations (Reuters)
Perc
ent p
er a
nnum
Exchange Rate
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
crawl rateFt/ euro exchange rateexchang rate band - bottomexchange rate band - midpointexchange rate band - topFo
rint/
euro
Exchange rate craw
l - depreciation rate
Maastricht on Their Minds
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
105
110
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Inflation differentialReal exchange rate (CPI based)
Infla
tion
diff
eren
tial (
HU
-EA
), pe
rcen
t per
ann
um
Real exchange rate (2000=
100)
Inflation Forecast RecordForecast Test Statistic Sample No. of
Observations
Reuters-InflationIT
110.04*-0.49 (0.32)
1997-2005 100
Consensus Inflation IT
3093.29*-0.27 (0.31)
1996-2005 107
Consensus Year Ahead InflationIT
1353.34*-0.33 (0.31)
1996-2005 107
Forecast Combination InflationIT
349.70*-0.38 (0.35)
1997-2005 100
GDP growth ConsensusIT
8.02**-1.13 (1.94)
1995-2005 106
GDP growth Year AheadIT
3.64-0.99 (1.96)
1996-2005 106
Real Time Problems I
80
85
90
95
100
105
110
1999:01 1999:07 2000:01 2000:07 2001:01 2001:07 2002:01
December 2000 vintageMarch 2002 vintage
94
96
98
100
102
104
1999:01 1999:07 2000:01 2000:07 2001:01
August 2005 vintageMarch 2002 vintage
Rea
l exc
hang
e ra
te (2
000=
100)
Rea
l exc
hang
e ra
te (1
994=
100)
Real Time Problems II
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
199619971998199920002001200220032004
Latest available (2005 Oct)August 2004 vintageAugust 2005 vintageMarch 2001 vintage
Perc
ent (ann
ualiz
ed)