islamic azad university a thesis submitted in partial...

31
Islamic Azad University Science and Research Branch A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of Requirements for the Degree of Master of Art in Teaching English as a Foreign Language (M.A) The Relationship between Iranian EFL Learners' Emotional Intelligence and their Speaking Strategy Preference Advisor: Dr. Behdokht Mal Amiri Reader: Dr. Mansour Fahim By: Somayeh Shah Hosseini 2011

Upload: others

Post on 30-Jan-2021

7 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Islamic Azad University

    Science and Research Branch

    A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of Requirements for the Degree

    of Master of Art in Teaching English as a Foreign Language (M.A)

    The Relationship between Iranian EFL Learners' Emotional Intelligence and

    their Speaking Strategy Preference

    Advisor: Dr. Behdokht Mal Amiri

    Reader:

    Dr. Mansour Fahim

    By: Somayeh Shah Hosseini

    2011

  • Table of Contents

    Contents Page No Acknowledgement…………………………………………………………… III Dedication……………………………………………………………………. IV Table of Contents ……………………………………………………………. V Abstract………………………………………………………………………. 1 1. CHAPTER 1: Background and Purpose 1.1 Statement of the Problem .............................................................................. 5 1.2 Significance of the Study .............................................................................. 6 1.3 Research Questions ....................................................................................... 9 1.4 Hypotheses ..................................................................................................... 10 1.5 Definition of the Key Terms ......................................................................... 10 1.6 Limitations and Delimitations of the Study .................................................. 12 2. CHAPTER 2: Review of the Related Literature 2.1 Emotional intelligence .................................................................................... 14

    2.1.1 Emotional Intelligence and Language Learning ................................... 18 2.1.2 Using Emotional Intelligence in Teaching Reading Comprehension .............................................................................................. 18 2.1.3 Emotional intelligence & performance .................................................. 19 2.1.4 Quality of social interactions ................................................................ 21 2.1.5 Dimensions of emotional intelligence .................................................. 22 2.1.6 EQ-I ....................................................................................................... 23 2.1.7 Age ......................................................................................................... 25 2.1.8 The Improvement of Emotional Intelligence ......................................... 26 2.1.9 Mayer and Salovey classification .......................................................... 26 2.1.10 Trait EI ................................................................................................. 27 2.1.11 Emotional Intelligence: Ability and Mixed Models ............................ 27 2.1.12 EQ-Map Questionnaire ........................................................................ 30 2.1.13 EI & work ………………………. ...................................................... 30 2.1.14 EI and leadership in adolescents .......................................................... 31 2.1.15 EI & academic success ........................................................................ 32 2.1.16 Some Misconceptions by Daniel Goleman, (1998) ............................ 36 2.1.17 The Limits of IQ ................................................................................. 36 2.1.18 Emotional Competence ....................................................................... 37

    2.2 Language Learning Strategies ……………….............................................. 40 2.2.1 Problems in Classifying Strategies ....................................................... 43 2.2.2 Definition of Communication Strategies .............................................. 43 2.2.3 Strategies for Negotiation of Meaning and Communication ................ 47

  • Contents Page No

    2.2.4 EFL learners' beliefs and learning strategy use …………………………. . 48 2.2.5 Theories of self-efficacy and attribution ..................................................... 50 2.2.6 Studies of beliefs, motivation and strategy use ........................................... 51 2.2.7 Language learning strategies and Age and stages of learning or Schooling ............................................................................................................. 54 2.2.8 Language proficiency .................................................................................. 55 2.2.9 Factors Influencing the Choice of L2 Learning Strategies ......................... 56 2.2.10 L2 Strategy Training ................................................................................. 57 2.2.11 Strategies-based instruction on speaking a foreign language ................... 58 2.2.12 Strategy use ............................................................................................... 59 2.2.13 Metacognitive Knowledge ........................................................................ 60 2.2.14 Relation between Metacognitive Knowledge and Strategy Use ............... 61 2.2.15 Different views .......................................................................................... 62 2.2.16 Speaking & listening strategy use ............................................................. 64 2.2.17 Oral Skills ................................................................................................. 65 2.2.18 Strategies, Tactics, Techniques and Moves .............................................. 71 2.2.19 Language learning styles ........................................................................... 72 2.2.20 Strategy Use Often Relates to Style Preferences ...................................... 74

    3. CHAPTER 3: Method 3.1 Subjects .......................................................................................................... 75 3.2 Instrumentation .............................................................................................. 76

    3.2.1 English test of TOEFL (2003) .............................................................. 76 3.2.2 Emotional Intelligence Scale (Bar-On et al., (1997) ............................. 77 3.2.3 Speaking strategy preference Scale (Riazi & khodadadi, 2007) ........... 78

    3.3 Data Collection Procedure ............................................................................. 78 3.4 Statistical Analysis ......................................................................................... 80

    3.5 Design ............................................................................................................ 80 4. CHAPTER 4: Results and Discussion 4.1 Restatement of the Problem ........................................................................... 82 4.2 Data analyses and Results .............................................................................. 83 4.2.1 Testing the first null hypothesis ............................................................ 90 4.2.2 Testing the second null hypothesis ....................................................... 91 4.2.3 Testing the third null hypothesis ........................................................... 93 4.2.4 Testing the fourth null hypothesis ......................................................... 95 4.2.5 Testing the fifth hypothesis ................................................................... 96 4.2.6 Testing the sixth hypothesis .................................................................. 99 4.3 Discussions .............................................................................................. 103

  • Contents Page No

    5. CHAPTER 5: Conclusion and Pedagogical Implications

    5.1 Conclusion …………………………………………………………… 108 5.2 Pedagogical Implications …………………………………………….. 109 5.3 Suggestion for Further Research ……………………………………. 113

    References……………………………………………………………..……. 115 Appendix A…………………………………………………………….…… 136 Appendix B…………………………………………………………………. 160 Appendix C……………………………………………………….……........ 163 Persian Abstract…………………………………………………………… 168

  • List of Tables

    Table Page No

    Table 4.1 ……… ............................................................................................. …….. 106 Table 4.2 ........................................................................................................ …….. 113 Table 4.3 …….. .............................................................................................. …….. 115 Table 4.4 ……… ............................................................................................. ……. 117 Table 4.5 ……… ............................................................................................. …….. 119 Table 4.6 ......................................................................................................... …….. 120 Table 4.7 ......................................................................................................... …….. 120 Table 4.8 ......................................................................................................... …….. 121 Table 4.9 ....................................................................................................... …….. 121 Table 4.10 ...................................................................................................... …… 122 Table 4.11 ........................................................................................................ …… 123 Table 4.12 ....................................................................................................... …… 123 Table 4.13 ........................................................................................................ …… 124 Table 4.14 ....................................................................................................... …… 125 Table 4.15 ..................................................................................................... …… 125 Table 4.16 ....................................................................................................... …… 126 Table 4.17 ....................................................................................................... …… 126

  • List of Figures

    Figure Page No Figure 4.1 ..................................................................................... ......... 107 Figure 4.2 ...................................................................................... … ..... 108 Figure 4.3 ...................................................................................... ......... 109 Figure 4.4 ...................................................................................... ......... 110 Figure 4.5 ...................................................................................... ......... 111 Figure 4.6 ….................................................................................. ......... 112 Figure 4.7 ….................................................................................. ......... 114 Figure 4.8 ...................................................................................... ......... 116 Figure 4.9 ...................................................................................... ......... 118

  • 1

    Abstract

    Emotional intelligence, as concerned with how an individual recognizes

    and regulates his or her emotions, has been in limelight quite recently. This

    study attempted to assess the advanced Iranian EFL learner's EI and its

    relationship with the speaking strategy preference (one important skill that

    appears to have important effects on teacher and student outcomes) among

    Iranian EFL learners. The Researcher hypothesized that there is no

    significant relationship between learners' EI and its subscales (emotional

    self-awareness and assertiveness) and speaking strategy preference. The

    results obtained showed that there was no significant correlation between

    perceived EI and speaking strategy preference, but there is a significant

    relationship between emotional self-awareness and speaking strategy

    preference. There is a significant relationship between assertiveness and

    speaking strategy preference and there is a significant relationship between

    gender and speaking strategy preference. The regression conducted and

    regression analyses revealed that speaking strategy preference could

    predict emotional self-awareness. Also analyses showed the speaking

    strategy preference could be a good predictor of assertiveness. Gender

    could predict Speaking strategy preference.

  • 115

    6. The focus of this study was on EFL learners' speaking strategies

    preference in general term and other research studies can be done on

    separate subscales of speaking strategy.

    7. This study was based on a sample of Iranian EFL learners. It can be

    repeated for the population of EFL teachers.

    This research can be done in different formats to answer other questions

    that may come to attentive and intelligent minds including.

    References

    Abisamara, N. (2000). The relationship between emotional intelligence and

    Academic achievement in eleventh graders. M.A. thesis, Aubum

    University, Montgomery, Alabama.

  • 116

    Aghasafari, M. (2006). On the relationship between emotional intelligence

    and language learning strategies. M.A. thesis, Allameh Tabataba'ii

    University, Tehran.

    Ashrafi, M. (2005). The impact of Iranian EFL Learners on their language

    learning strategies use. M.A. thesis, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

    Bandura, A. (1986). The explanatory and predictive scope of selfficacy

    theory. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 4, 359-373.

    Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy. New York: W.H Freeman and Co.

    Bandura, A. (2006). Guides for constructing self-efficacy scales. In T.Urdan

    & F.Pajares (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (pp. 307-337).

    Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.

    Bandura, A., Schunk, D., (1981). Cultivating competence, self-efficacy, and

    intrinsic interest through proximal self-motivation. Journal of Personality

    and Social Psychology 41, 586-598.

  • 117

    Barchard, R. A. (2003). Psychology : EQ. Massachusetts: Allyn and Bacon.

    Bar-On, R. (1997). Bar-On Emotional Quotient Inventory (EQ-i): Technical

    Manual. Multi-Health Systems. Toronto, Canada

    Bar-On, R. (2004). The Bar-On Emotional Quotient Inventory (EQ-

    i):Rationale, description and summary of psychometric properties. In

    G.Geher (Ed.), Measuring emotional intelligence: Common ground and

    controversy (pp. 115–145). New York: Nova Science.

    Bar-on, R., Parker, J. (2000). The handbook of emotional intelligence.

    SanFrancisco : Jossy-Bass

    Bar-On, R., Parker, J., & Goleman, D. (2006). The handbook of emotional

    inteleigence. Sanfrancisco, CA: Jossy-Bass

    Bialystok, E. (1979). The role of conscious strategies in second language

    proficiency. Canadian Modern Language Review 35, 372-394.

    Bialystok, E. (1990). Communication strategies: A psychological analysis of

    Second-language use. Oxford, U.K.: Blackwell

  • 118

    Bradberry, T. & Greaves, J. (2003). Emotional intelligence appraisal. San

    Diego: Talent Smart.

    Brown, D. (1994): Principles of language learning and teaching. San

    Francisco : Jossy-Bass.

    Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by principle. New York: Longman.

    Brown, H. D. (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching. NY:

    Longman.

    Bygate, M. (1987). Speaking. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Byram, M. (Ed.). (2000). Routledge encyclopedia of language teaching and

    learning(6th ed., vols. 1-30). London: Routledge.

    Caruso, D., & Salovey, P. (2004). The emotionally intelligent manager.

    Sanfrancisco: Jossey-Bass.

  • 119

    Chamot, A.U., and Kupper, L. (1989). Learning Strategies in Foreign

    Language Instruction, Foreign Language Annals 22, 13-24.

    Charbonneau, D., & Nicol, A. (2001). Personality and Individual Differences

    System, 33, 1101–1113.

    www.elsevier.com/locate/paid

    Chastain, K. (1988). Developing secong language skills. Florida: Harcourt

    Jovanovich.

    Chen, S. (1990). A Study of Communication Strategies in Interlanguage

    Production by Chinese EFL learners, Language Learning 40(2), 155-187.

    Cheng Ming. Ch., & Do¨rnyei, Z. (2007). The Use of Motivational

    Strategies in Language Instruction: The Case of EFL Teaching in Taiwan.

    Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1(1), 22-32.

    Cherniss, C., & Goleman, D. (2001). The emotionally intelligent workplace.

    Sanfrancisco: Jossey-Bass.

  • 120

    Cherniss, C. (2002). The business case for emotional intelligence. Retrieved

    February 26, 2008, from

    www.eiconsortium.org.

    Christiton, M. (1997). Emotional intelligence and second language teaching :

    TESOL Matters, 7(3), 10-16.

    Christiton, M. (1999). Application of brain-based research for second

    language teaching and learning: TESOL Matters, 9(2), 140-144.

    Clarke, K. (2000) Emotional intelligence in the workplace: Acquisition and

    Collection Development Librarian, 24(1), 470-504.

    Ciarrochi, J., Forgas, J., & Mayer, J. M. (2007). Emotional intelligence in

    everyday's life: A scientific inqueiry. Philadelphia: Psychology press.

    Cohen, A.D. (1998). Strategies in Learning and Using a Second Language.

    Harlow:Longman.

    Cohen, C. I. (2003). Schizophrenia into later life: Treatment, research and

    policy.Washington, DC: APA Publishing.

  • 121

    Cohen, A.D., Weaver, S.J. & Yi, T.Y., (1995). The Impact of Strategies-

    Based Instruction on Speaking a Foreign Language. Research Report.

    Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA:National Foreign Language Research

    Center

    Dama´ sio, A. R., (1994). Descartes’ error: emotion, reason, and the human

    brain. New York: Putnam.

    Daya, A. L., & Carrollb, S. A., (2004). Using an ability-based measure of

    emotional intelligence topredict individual performance, group

    performance, andgroup citizenship behaviours. Personality and Individual

    Differences, 36, 1443–1458.

    www.elsevier.com/locate/paid

    Dehshiri, Gh. (2004). Standardization of Bar-On Emotional Quotient

    Inventory on Tehran university students. M.A. Thesis, Allameh Tabataba'ii

    university, Tehran.

  • 122

    Dornyei, Z. (2006). Creating a motivating classroom environment. In J.

    Cummins and C. Davison (eds) The Handbook of English language

    teaching. New York:Springer.

    Ehrman, M., & Oxford, R. (1995). Cognition plus: Correlates of language

    learning success. The Modern Language Journal, 79(1), 67-89.

    Ekman, P., & Davidson, R. J. (Eds.). (1994). The nature of emotion:

    Fundamental questions. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Elias, H., Cheong, L., Muhamad, M., Nooreen, N., & Abdullah, M. (2006).

    The relationship between students’ self-efficacy and their English language

    achievement. Jurnal Pendidik dan Pendidikan, 21, 61-71.

    Epstein, S. (1998). Constructive thinking: The key to emotional intelligence.

    NY: Praeger publishers.

    Faerch, C. and Kasper, G. (1983) Strategies in Interlanguage Communication.

    London:Longman.

  • 123

    Feldman, L., & Salovey, P. (2002). The wisdom in feeling: Psychological

    process in emotional intelligence. NJ: Guidford press.

    Frederickson, B.L. (2001). The role of positive emotion in positive

    psychology: the broadening-and-build theory of positive emotion.

    American Psychology 56, 218–226.

    Gardner, H. (1999). Deeper into multiple intelligence: Multiple Intelligences

    theory as a tool. Retrieved December 20, 1999 from

    http:// www.angelfire.com/ohthemidiasnews/dec2are.files

    Gardner, H. (2001). An education for the future. Retrieved March 13, 2001,

    from

    http:// www.pz.havard.edu/prodserv/rights.html

    Gohshn, I. (2001). Nurturing emotional intelligence through

    literature.FORUM, 39(1), 1-10.

  • 124

    Gold, K., & Concar, D. (2001). Emotional intelligence. Newscientist.

    Retrieved November 20, 2008 from

    http://www.newscientist.com/nsplus/insight/emotions/emotions.html/

    Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional intelligence. New York: Bantam Books.

    Goleman, D. (1998). Working with emotional intelligence . NY: Bantam

    Doubleday Dell publishing.

    Goleman, D. (2005). Emotional intelligence. NY: Bantam Doubleday Dell

    publishing.

    Goleman, D., & Cherniss, C. (2001). The emotionally intelligent workplace.

    Sanfrancisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Greg, Th. (2005). Emotional intelligence. Retrieved February 26, 2008, from

    www.ei.com

    Grewal, D., & Salovey, P. (2007): Feeling smart: The science of emotional

    intelligence. American Scientists, 93, 330–339.

  • 125

    Hawkey, K., (2006). Emotional intelligence and mentoring in pre-service

    teacher education: a literature review. Mentoring and Tutoring, 14 (2),

    137–147.

    Hein, S. (2001). Developing emotional intelligence. NY: Bantam

    Doubleday Dell publishing.

    Hemmati T., Mills, J., Kroner, D. (2004). The validity of the Bar-On

    emotional intelligence quotient in an offender population Personality and

    Individual Differences. System, 37, 695–706

    Horwitz, E.K. (1987). Surveying student beliefs about language learning. In

    Wenden, A.L., & Rubin, J.(Eds.), Learner Strategies in Language

    Learning (pp. 119-129). NJ: Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.

    Horwitz, E.K., (1988). The beliefs about language learning of beginning

    university foreign language students. Modern Language Journal, 72, 283-

    294.

    Huang, X.H. and van Naerssen, M. (1987). Learning strategies for oral

    communication. Applied Linguistics 8, 287–307.

  • 126

    Iordanoglou, D., (2007). The teacher as leader: the relationship between

    emotional intelligence leadership effectiveness, commitment and

    satisfaction. Journal of Leadership Studies, 1 (3), 57–66.

    Jiwen Song, L., Huang, G., Peng, K., Law, K., & Chen, Z. (2010). The

    differential effects of general mental ability and emotional intelligence on

    academic performance and social interactions. Intelligence, 38,137–143.

    Kremenitzer, J.P., (2005). The emotionally intelligent early childhood

    educator: self-reflective journaling. Early Childhood Education Journal,

    33 (1), 3–9.

    Li, R. (1996). A theory of Conceptual Intelligence: Thinking, Learning,

    Creativity, and Giftedness. Westport, CT: Praeger

    Liao, P. (2006). EFL Learners’ Beliefs about andStrategy Use of Translation

    inEnglish Learning. SAGE , 37(2), 191-215 http://RELC.sagepub.com

    Lopes, P. N., Salovey, P., Côté, S., & Beers, M. (2005). Emotion regulation

    ability and the quality of social interaction. Emotion, 5, 113–118.

  • 127

    Lopes, P., Salovey, P., & Straus, R. (2002). Personality and Individual

    Differences, 35, 641–658.

    Magogwe, J. M., & Oliver, R. (2007). The relationship between language

    learning strategies, proficiency, age and self-efficacy beliefs: A study of

    language learners in Botswana. System, 35, 338–352.

    Matthews, G., Zeidner, M., & Roberts, R. D. (2007). Emotional

    intelligence:Knowns and unknowns. Oxford, England: Oxford

    UniversityPress.

    Mayer, J. M., & Salovey, P. (1990). Emotional Intelligence . Baywood

    Publishing Company.

    Mayer, J. D., & Salovey, P. (1997). What is emotional intelligence? In P.

    Salovey, & D. Sluyter (Eds.), Emotional development and emotional

    intelligence: implications for educators (pp. 3–31). New York: Basic

    Books.

  • 128

    Mayer, J. M., Salovey, P., & Caruso, D. R. (2004). Theory findings,

    implications. Psychological Inquiry, 15(3), 243-258.

    Mayer, J. D., Salovey, & P. Caruso, D. R., (1999). Emotional intelligence

    meets traditional standards for intelligence. Intelligence, 27, 267–298.

    Mayer, J. D., Salovey, P., & Caruso, D. R. (2008). Emotional

    IntelligenceNew Ability or Eclectic Traits? American Psychologist 63(6),

    503–517.

    Murray, B. (1998). Does emotional intelligence matter at work. American

    Psychological Association, 29(7), 123-133.

    Moore, L. C. (2009). On communicative competence. . .in the field.

    Language & Communication.29, 244–253.

    Nakatani, Y. (2010). Identifying Strategies That Facilitate EFL earners’ Oral

    Communication: A Classroom Study Using Multiple Data Collection

    Procedures. The Modern Language Journal.10, 116-136.

  • 129

    Nettelbeck, T. (2004). Emotional intelligence is. . .?Janette Warwick. System

    ,37, 1091–1100.

    www.elsevier.com/locate/paid

    Nunan, D., (1997). Does learner strategy training make a difference? Lenguas

    Modernas, 24,123-142.

    Nunan, D. (2001). Second language teaching and learning. Boston: Heinle

    and Heinle Publishers.

    Nyikos, M., & Oxford, R. (1993). A factor analytic study of language-

    learning strategy use. The modern Language Journal, 77(1), 1-22.

    O’Malley, J.M. ,& Chamot, A.U. (1990). Learning Strategies in Second

    Language Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Oxford, R., (1989). The Role of Styles and Strategies in Second Language

    Learning. Center for Applied Linguistics, Washington, DC.

  • 130

    Oxford, R.L. (1990). Language Learning Strategies: What Every Teacher

    Should Know. Boston: Heinle and Heinle.

    Oxford, R.L., Burry-Stock, J. (1995). Assessing the use of language learning

    strategies worldwide with the ESL/EFL version of the strategy inventory

    of language learning (SILL). System, 23 (1), 1–23.

    Oxford, R.L., & Nyikos, M. (1989). Variables affecting choice of language

    learning strategies by university students.The Modern Language Journal

    73 (3), 291–300.

    Paribakht, T. (1985). Strategiccompetence and language proficiency. Applied

    Linguistics, 6, 132-146.

    Peacock, M., & HO, B. (2003). Student language learning strategies across

    eight disciplines. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 13(2), 11-

    35.

  • 131

    Pishghadam, R. (2007). On the Influence of Emotional Intelligence and

    Verbal Intelligence on Second Language Learning. Ph. D. Thesis, Allameh

    Tabataba'ii University, Tehran.

    Rastegar, M. & Memarpour, S. (2009).The relationship between emotional

    intelligence and self-efficacy among Iranian EFL teachers. System, 37,

    700–707.

    www.elsevier.com/locate/system

    Riazi, A. M., & Khodadadi, F. (2007). The effect of EFL students' level of

    Proficiency on their use of speaking strategies. The Journal of TELL, 2(1),

    99-112.

    Riazi, A. M., & Rahimi, M. (2005). Iranian students' pattern of strategy use.

    The Journal of Asia TEFL, 2(1), 103-129.

    Richards, J. C., and Renandya W. A. (2002). Methodology in language

    teaching . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • 132

    Rohani, A. (2008). An Investigation into Emotional Intelligence, Foreign

    Language Anxiety and Empathy through a Cognitive-Affective Course in

    an EFL Context. Linguistik online, 34, 37- 41

    Rubin, J. (1975). What the ‘good language learner’ can teach us. TESOL

    Quarterly, 9, 41–51.

    Salovey, P., Mayer, J.D. (1990). Emotional intelligence. Imagination,

    Cognition and Personality, 9, 185–211.

    Scholfield, P. (2002). Communication strategies. Applied Linguistics, 19, 219-

    232.

    Schunk, D.L., (1985). Self-efficacy and classroom learning. Psychology in the

    Schools, 22, 208-223.

    Sensiper, S. (2000). Emotional I, Retrieved April 18, 2002, from

    http:// healthlibrary.com/t.html

  • 133

    Shams abadi, R. (2005). Bar-On Emotional Quotient Inventory

    Standardization and factor analysis on high school students in Mashad.

    M.A. Thesis, Psychiatric Institute, Tehran.

    Siann, G., & Ugwuegbu, D. (1988). Educational psychology in a changing

    world (2nd ed.). Winchester: Unwin Hyman.

    Skehan, P. (1989). Individual differences in Second Language Leaning.

    London: Edward Arnold

    Stottlemayer, B. G. (2002). A Conceptual Framework for Emotional

    Intelligence in Education Factors Affecting Student Achievement. Ph. D.

    Thesis, A& M university-Kings ville, Texas.

    www. trans4mind.com

    Weisinger, H. (2000). Emotional intelligence at work. Sanfrancisco: Jossey-

    Bass.

    Wenden, A. (1986). Helping Language Learners Think about Learning, ELT

    Journal, 40(1), 3-12.

  • 134

    Wenden, A. (1986). What do second-language learners know about their

    language learning: A second look at retrospective accounts. Applied

    Linguistics, 7(2), 186-201.

    Wenden, A.L. (1987). How to be a successful language learner: Insights and

    prescriptions from L2 learners. In A. Wenden and J. Rubin (eds) Learner

    Strategies in Language Learning (pp. 103–18). Englewood Cliffs, NJ:

    Prentice Hall.

    Wenden, A.L. (1991). Learner Strategies for Learner Autonomy. Englewood

    Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Wenden, A.L. (1998). Metacognitive knowledge and language learning.

    Applied Linguistics, 19, 515–537.

    Yang, N.D. (1999). The relationship between EFL learners’ beliefs and

    learning strategy use. System, 27, 515–535.

    Zareh, M. (2002). Emotional Intelligence Part in Academic Success. M.A.

    Thesis, Psychiatric Institute, Tehran.

    Zhang, L. (2003). Research into Chinese EFL learners. RELC, 34(3), 284-322

  • 135

    Zhang, D., & Goh, C.M. (2006). Strategy Knowledge and Perceived

    StrategyUse:Singaporean Students’Awareness of Listening and

    SpeakingStrategies. System, 15(3), 115-119.

    Appendix A: TOEFL test (2003)

    Appendix B: Emotional Intelligence Scale (Bar-On et al., 1997).

  • 136

    Appendix C: Speaking strategy preference Scale (Riazi & Khodadadi,

    2007).

  • 137

    چکيده

    بررسی رابطه هوش هيجانی و استفاده از استراتژيهای گفتاری دانشجويان زبان

    انگليسي

    82به اين منظور . استهدف از اين مطالعه بررسی رابطه هوش هيجانی و استفاده از استراتژيهای گفتاری

    دانشجوی مقطع کارشناسی ارشد در رشته های آموزش زبان انگليسی و ادبيات انگليسی در يک آزمون تافل

    پرسشنامه 2برای جمع آوری اطالعات از . نفر به عنوان افراد همگن انتخاب شدند 62شرکت کردند و سرانجام

    شرکت . ده از استراتژيهای گفتاری دکتر رياضی و خدادای آن و پرسشنامه استفا -پرسشنامه بار: استفاده شد

    برای پيدا کردن رابطه . امتيازی اليکرت در اين پرسشنامه ها امتيازبندی شدند 5کننده ها بر اساس مقياس پاسخ

    يافته های . بين متغيرها از آمار توصيفی، مقايسه ميانگين ها، همبستگی پيرسون و تحليل رگرسيون استفاده شد

    ی و مقايسه ميانگين ها نشان داد که بصورت کلی همبستگی بين هوش هيجانی و استفاده از استراتژيهای کم

    خود آگاهی هيجانی و (در حاليکه تفاوت معنا داری بين دو خرده مقياس هوش هيجانی .گفتاری وجود ندارد

    نشان داد که خودآگاهی رگرسيوندر انتها تحليل . و استفاد ه از استراتژيهای گفتاری مشاهده شد) خودابرازی

    . پيش بينی کننده استفاده از استراتژيهای گفتاری هستند) خرده مقياسهای هوش هيجانی(هيجانی و خودابرازی

    همچنين رابطه معناداری بين جنسيت افراد و الگوی استفاده ار استراتژيهای گفتاری مشاهده شد و تحليل

    نتايج اين مطالعه به ما . ينی کننده استفاده از استرتژيهای گفتاريسترگرسيون نشان داد که جنسيت يک پيش ب

    خود آگاهی هيجانی و (اجازه داد که نتيجه گيری هايی درباره رابطه بين دو خرده مقياس هوش هيجانی

    و استفاد ه از استراتژيهای گفتاری داشته باشيم که رهنمودهای آموزشی برای معلمان، تهيه ) خودابرازی

    .دگان مواد درسی و تمام افراد شامل فرايند آموزشی يادگيری زبان خارجی خواهد داشتکنن

  • ب

    دانشگاه آزاد اسالمي واحد علوم و تحقيقات

    )M.A(نامه آارشناسي ارشد رشته آموزش زبان انگليسي پايان

    :موضوع

    رابطه هوش هيجانی و استفاده از استراتژيهای گفتاری دانشجويان زبان انگليسي

    :استاد راهنما دآتر بهدخت مالميری

    :استاد مشاور دآتر منصور فهيم

    :نگارنده

    سميه شاه حسينی

    سال تحصيلي 1390- 1389