isen 315 spring 2011 dr. gary gaukler. lot size reorder point systems assumptions –inventory...
TRANSCRIPT
ISEN 315Spring 2011
Dr. Gary Gaukler
Lot Size Reorder Point Systems
Assumptions– Inventory levels are reviewed continuously (the
level of on-hand inventory is known at all times)– Demand is random but the mean and variance of
demand are constant. (stationary demand)– There is a positive leadtime, τ. This is the time that
elapses from the time an order is placed until it arrives.
– The costs are: • Set-up each time an order is placed at $K per order• Unit order cost at $c for each unit ordered• Holding at $h per unit held per unit time ( i. e., per year)• Penalty cost of $p per unit of unsatisfied demand
The Inventory Control Policy
• Keep track of inventory position (IP)• IP = net inventory + on order• When IP reaches R, place order of size Q
Inventory Levels
Solution Procedure
• The optimal solution procedure requires iterating between the two equations for Q and R until convergence occurs (which is generally quite fast).
• A cost effective approximation is to set Q=EOQ and find R from the second equation.
• In this class, we will use the approximation.
Example• Selling mustard jars• Jars cost $10, replenishment lead time 6 months• Holding cost 20% per year• Loss-of-goodwill cost $25 per jar• Order setup $50• Lead time demand N(100, 25)
Example
Example
Service Levels in (Q,R) Systems
• In many circumstances, the penalty cost, p, is difficult to estimate
• Common business practice is to set inventory levels to meet a specified service objective instead
• Service objectives: Type 1 and Type 2
Service Levels in (Q,R) Systems
• Type 1 service: Choose R so that the probability of not stocking out in the lead time is equal to a specified value.
• Type 2 service. Choose both Q and R so that the proportion of demands satisfied from stock equals a specified value.
Comparison Order Cycle Demand Stock-Outs
1 180 02 75 03 235 454 140 05 180 06 200 107 150 08 90 09 160 010 40 0
For a type 1 service objective there are two cycles out of ten in which a stockout occurs, so the type 1 service level is 80%. For type 2 service, there are a total of 1,450 units demand and 55 stockouts (which means that 1,395 demand are satisfied). This translates to a 96% fill rate.
Type I Service Level
Determine R from F(R) = aQ=EOQ
E.g., if a = 0.95:“Fill all demands in 95% of the order
cycles”
Type II Service Level
a.k.a. “Fill rate”
Fraction of all demands filled without backordering
Fill rate = 1 – unfilled rate
Type II Service Level
Summary of Computations
• For type 1 service, if the desired service level is α, then one finds R from F(R)= α and Q=EOQ.
• For Type 2 service, set Q=EOQ and find R to satisfy n(R) = (1-β)Q.
Imputed (implied) Shortage Cost
Why did we want to use service levels instead of shortage costs?
Each choice of service level implies a shortage cost!
Imputed (implied) Shortage Cost
Calculate Q, R using service level formulas
Then, 1 - F(R) = Qh / (pλ)
Imputed (implied) Shortage Cost
Imputed shortage cost vs. service level:
Exchange Curve
Safety stock vs. stockouts: