isbn: 978-602-71993-4-7 - seminar... · 2018. 7. 9. · international seminar “quality assurance...
TRANSCRIPT
-
International Seminar “Quality Assurance For Educational Services” Ki Sarino Mangun Pranoto Room - University of Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa Saturday, January 17th 2015
i
ISBN: 978-602-71993-4-7
-
International Seminar “Quality Assurance For Educational Services” Ki Sarino Mangun Pranoto Room - University of Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa Saturday, January 17th 2015
ii
Perpustakaan Nasional : Katalog Dalam Terbitan (KDT) International Seminar on Education Management “Quality Assurance on
Education Services” 2015
ISBN: 978-602-71993-4-7
Yogyakarta : Pascasarjana UST Pres, 2015
260 halaman
PROCEEDING
International Seminar on Education Management
Gedung Pascasarjana Pendidikan Lantai II
Jl. Kusumanegara 157 Yogyakarta
Telp. : 0274564369 Email : [email protected]
Education Management of Directorate Post Graduate Program
Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa UniversityYogyakarta
Copyright©2015
©HAK CIPTA DILINDUNGI OLEH UNDANG - UNDANG
mailto:[email protected]
-
International Seminar “Quality Assurance For Educational Services” Ki Sarino Mangun Pranoto Room - University of Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa Saturday, January 17th 2015
iii
Proceeding International Seminar on Education Management “Quality Assurance on Education
Services” 2015
Publishing Institute
Education Management of Directorate Post Graduate Program University of
Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa Yogyakarta
Director of Publication
Dr. Mundilarno, M.Pd.
Board of Reviewers
Prof. Dr. Supriyoko, M.Pd.
Prof. Dr. Sugiyono, M.Pd.
Dr. Wileus Purbonuswanto, M.Pd
Dr. Nanang Subekti, M.Pd.
Yuyun Yulia, M.Pd, Ph.D.
Editors
Dr. Wileus Purbonuswanto, M.Pd
Dr. Nanang Subekti, M.Pd.
Yuyun Yulia, M.Pd, Ph.D.
Dr. Sunarto, M.Si.
Lay Out
Dr. Wileus Purnuswanto, M.Pd
Iswanto Apri Nugroho, A.Md
Address
Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa University Yogyakarta
ISSN: 978-602-71993-4-7
Website: www.mpd.ustjogja.ac.id
E-mail: [email protected]
All right reserved. No part or all of this publication may be reproduced without the
prior written permission of Education Management of Directorate Post Graduate
Program - Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa University Yogyakarta. All articles in this
proceeding are not the official opinions and standings of editors. Contents and
consequencies resulted from the articles are responsibilities of individual writers.
http://www.mpd.ustjogja.ac.id/mailto:[email protected]
-
International Seminar “Quality Assurance For Educational Services” Ki Sarino Mangun Pranoto Room - University of Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa Saturday, January 17th 2015
iv
BACKGROUND
The quality of education is the need of every one. Based on this believe,
goverment and all of the education institution must effort to improve the quality of
education in Indonesia.Implementation of Curriculum 2013 and many others
programsin education and on schools of all level in Indonesia are the effort of the
goverment to improve the quality of education. For these reasons, all of the
educational institution must ensure the quality educational by a good management
services i.e by developing teachers competencies, teaching learning strategies,
completing the the fascilities, networking, etc.
Based on the fact that quality is a complex and dinamic, ensuring program
must be develop in every eduacational institution to ensure it. Workshop,
seminars, and the likes are needed regularly by educational stakeholders, schools,
higher educations institutions, and goverment.
On the basis of the above consideration, lectures, principals, teachers,
parents, and studentsmay identify problems in teaching learning daily and
programs which can overcome its. However education quality assurence, is not
easy problem and must be overcome by good management!
-
International Seminar “Quality Assurance For Educational Services” Ki Sarino Mangun Pranoto Room - University of Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa Saturday, January 17th 2015
v
FOREWORD
Acreditation on all af educational institution (schools and high education
insttitutions) has been executed by goverment since three dacades later. Also, in
2014 the Ministry of Education and Culture of government has established the
policy to implement curriculum of 2013 for elementary and intermediate
education in Indonesia. These programs and many others showed that gowerment
has very seriusly attentions in improving the quality education.
It also has means that schools and all of educational institutions must be
ready to implement all af the goverment policies in improving quality education
especialy curriculum of 2013. Basically, goverment need and effort to ensure all
of community can aksess the quality of education.
Dinamic and complex are the two principle characteristics of thequality of
education. So, effort to improve it need creativity in management of the
institution. In general, assuring the educational quality seems to be a new and
difficult thing for the teachers and of the institutions. So, several problems and
obstacles may appear in its practice. The teachers and lectures have to develop
creativity and teaching-learning strategies by improving selves continously.
Based to the above circumstances, the Study Program of Education
Management, Post Graduate Program of Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa University
Yogyakarta (Universitas Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa Yogyakarta) conduct the
international seminar on the theme “Quality Assurance on Education Services”.
By having this seminar, the participants are expected to possess the knowledge
and skills to develop and to apply the educational manegement especialy in
assuring the education quality.
Yogyakarta, January17, 2015
Head of Committee
Dr. Mundilarno, M.Pd
-
International Seminar “Quality Assurance For Educational Services” Ki Sarino Mangun Pranoto Room - University of Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa Saturday, January 17th 2015
vi
CONTENTS: pages
Title i
Background ii
Foreword iii
Content iv
Paper Presenter
DETERMINANTSOF PROCESSQUALITYANDGRADUATES QUALITY
Kardoyo (1-19)
THE DEVELOPMENT OF INCLUSIVE EDUCATION MANAGEMENT
MODEL TO IMPROVE THE PERFORMANCE OF PRINCIPALS AND
TEACHERS IN ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS
Munawir Yusuf (19-32)
THE IMPORTANCE OF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICERS IN PUBLIC
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL INTRETEP DISTRICT TEMANGGUNG REGENCY
Walminto, Slamet Hidayat (33-39)
DEVELOPMENT OF ASSESMENT INSTRUMENT TO ASSES RELIGIOUS
VALUE OF STUDENTS IN SCIENCE CLASS OF STATE JUNIOR HIGH
SCHOOL 4 YOGYAKARTA
Tusidi Karyono (40-47)
SERVICE MANAGEMENT OF PACKAGE B PROGRAM ON QUALITY
CULTURE IN SANGGAR ACTIVITY IN GORONTALO CITY Dr. Abdul Rahmat, M. Pd (48-60)
THE PRINCIPAL’S TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP MODEL OF
PRIVATE VOCATIONAL SCHOOL
Sitti Hartinah (61-78)
LEARNING MANAGEMENT OF AMONG SYSTEM TO DEVELOP
ACADEMIC ATTITUDE OF PHYSICS’ STUDENTS
Dr. Sumadi, M.Pd (79-87)
THE QUALITY ASSURANCE IN HIGHER EDUCATION THROUGH
ACCREDITATION
Dr. M.Th. Sri Rejeki Retnaningdyastuti, M.Pd, (88-96)
Drs. G. Rohastono Ajie, M.Pd.
EFFECTIVENESS OF TEMPLATE PROGRAM TO FACILITATE TEACHERS
IN DEVELOPING MULTIMEDIA INTERACTIVE LEARNING (MIL)
Siswanto (97-107)
-
International Seminar “Quality Assurance For Educational Services” Ki Sarino Mangun Pranoto Room - University of Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa Saturday, January 17th 2015
vii
DO LOCAL GOVERNMENT CARES ABOUT THE QUALITY OF
EDUCATION
Nurkolis, Yovitha Yuliejantiningsih (108-116)
QUALITY ASSURANCE OF EDUCATIONAL ASSESSMENTIN HIGHER
EDUCATION
Sunandar (117-125)
INCREASING THE EFFECTIVENESS AND LEARNING OUTCOME OF
ENGLISH SUBJECT APPLYING ROLE PLAY METHOD OF TENTH GRADE
STUDENTS OF ACCOUNTING 2 AT SMK N 2 SEMARANG SECOND
SEMESTER OF ACADEMIC YEAR 2013/2014
Sri Mulyani (126-137)
THE IMPROVEMENT OF ACTIVITY AND LEARNING OUTCOME OF CIVIS
EDUCATION IN THE MAIN MATERIAL OF “KAIDAH FUNDAMENTAL
BANGSAKU” THROUGH LEARNING MODEL APPLICATION OF “GADIS
SENSI” FOR TENTH GRADE STUDENTS OF OFFICE ADMINISTRATION
AT SMK N 2 SEMARANG, FIRST SEMESTER ACADEMIC YEAR 2014/2015
Sholihin (138-149)
FACTORSAND STRATEGYEDUCATIONMANAGEMENTAS
EDUCATIONQUALITYIMPROVEMENTEFFORTS
Teguh Tri Wasono (150-161)
TEACHER’S CREATIVITY: THE KEY OF PRIMARY SCHOOL EDUCATION
QUALITY
Sefin Umi Latifah (162-168)
TEACHER DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY IN THE IMPROVEMENT EFFORTS
OF EDUCATION QUALITY
Siti Haryati (169-177)
RESPONSE OF NON-FORMAL EDUCATOR ON THE ECHO OF
CERTIFICATION
Misran Rahman (178-182)
THE ROLE OF COOPERATIVE MODEL LEARNING IN DEVELOPING
CHARACTER EDUCATION IN SOCIAL SKILLS
R. Pramono (183-189)
CULTURAL ASPECTS IN QUALITY ASSURANCE OF EDUCATION
SERVICES
Dr. Mundilarno, M.Pd (190-197)
-
International Seminar “Quality Assurance For Educational Services” Ki Sarino Mangun Pranoto Room - University of Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa Saturday, January 17th 2015
viii
QUALITY ASSURANCE AND EFFECTIVENESS OF MANAGEMENT
LEARNING ELECTRICITY MAGNET WITH ACCULTURATION NONTONI
(OBSERVATION), NITENI (WHEREAS), NEROKE (IMITATING), AND
NAMBAHI ( ADD ) COOPERATIVE MODEL APPROACH, AND
DOCUMENTATION EXPERIMENT STUDY ON STUDENTS EDUCATION
SEMESTER THREE PHYSICAL THE FACULTY EDUCATION
SARJANAWIYATA TAMANSISWA UNIVERSITY YOGYAKARTA
Dr. Sunarto, M.Si. (198-208)
THE IMPLEMENTATION OF STAD AS LEARNING MODEL IN HISTORY
LESSON WITH MAIN MATERIAL “ SNATCH BACK WEST IRIAN “ OF IX
CHLASS STUDENTS AT SMP NEGERI 34 SEMARANG SECOND
Rishati (209-221)
THE IMPLEMENTATION OF CONTINUOUS GUIDANCE AS EFFORT TO
IMPROVE THE TEACHER’S COMPETENCE IN COMPILING LEARNING
PLAN IN SD N SIDOMULYO 04 EAST UNGARAN SEMARANG
Dr. Welius Purnonuswanto, M.Pd. (222-230)
INTERNALIZATION OF ACADEMIC CULTURAL QUALITY TO BE AN
EXCELLENT UNIVERSITY BASED ON TAMANSISWA PERSPECTIVE
Dr. Siti Mariah, M.Pd. (231-239)
EVALUATION OF INCLUSIVE EDUCATION PROGRAM FOR SLOW
LEARNERS IN SD NEGERIPULUTAN 02 SALATIGA Yanuet Indah Z.T, Bambang S. Sulasmono (240-252)
PERFORMANCE OF BASIC EDUCATION THE ACHIEVEMENT OF EDUCATION
FOR ALL IN SALATIGA – INDONESIA
Bambang Ismanto (253-260)
-
International Seminar “Quality Assurance For Educational Services” Ki Sarino Mangun Pranoto Room - University of Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa Saturday, January 17th 2015
198
QUALITY ASSURANCE AND EFFECTIVENESS OF MANAGEMENT
LEARNING ELECTRICITY MAGNET WITH ACCULTURATION
NONTONI (OBSERVATION), NITENI (WHEREAS), NEROKE
(IMITATING), AND NAMBAHI ( ADD ) COOPERATIVE MODEL
APPROACH, AND DOCUMENTATION EXPERIMENT STUDY ON
STUDENTS EDUCATION SEMESTER THREE PHYSICAL THE FACULTY
EDUCATION SARJANAWIYATA TAMANSISWA UNIVERSITY
YOGYAKARTA
By: Sunarto
University of Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa Yogyakarta
Email: [email protected]
ABSTRACT
The objective study to . Knowing the quality assurance and effectiveness of
student learning outcomes in the cognitive competence , psychomotor , and effective
with acculturation models nontoni ( observation ) , neteni ( remembering ) , neroke (
imitating ) , ( 4 ) nambahi ( add ) on activities , namely : ( 1 ) learning cooperative , (
2 ) conducting experiments , and ( 3 ) report experiments .
Subjects were learning quality assurance management magnetic electricity
in the third semester student number 39 students . The location of research is in the
Physical Education Studies Program Faculty of Teacher Training and Education
Sciences University Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa . This data collection techniques use
the instrument objective multiple choice test , observation sheet Likert scale models ,
and documentation . Qualitative data analysis technique is to determine the
effectiveness of the quality assurance and learning outcomes of students in courses
magnetic electricity .
Results of research on learning with acculturation models notoni , neteni ,
neroke and nambahi using cooperative learning approach , experiment , and
documentation of student reports obtained an average score of 83.45 entry predicate
good or trustworthy . In order for the result to be very trustworthy increase expected
no improvement in the management of cooperative learning , experiment equipment,
coaching in preparing the trial reports , and worksheets student learning .
Keywords : assurance , quality , effective , acculturation , learning , electricity ,
magnetism .
INTRODUCTION
Background. Management of quality assurance and effectiveness of student
learning outcomes in physical education courses, namely : efficient, effective, and
quality is an issue that cannot easily be solved. Ki Hadjar Dewantara with learning
neteni models, neroke and nambahi ( Tri - N ) and can be increased to nontoni,
neteni, neroke, and nambahi ( Chess - N ) can be practiced in the study of magnetic
electricity.
mailto:[email protected]
-
International Seminar “Quality Assurance For Educational Services” Ki Sarino Mangun Pranoto Room - University of Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa Saturday, January 17th 2015
199
Use of Chess - N learning in students of physics education programs can be studied
with the cooperative model approach, experiment, experiment report can provide a
guarantee to produce effective learning, efficient, quality , and the goal is reached.
Cooperative learning, the principle of implementation is the group consisting of
three members to five members in activities with an issue or topic part of the
material physics learning . Cooperative learning model is able to use the model
Chess - N to be able to solve the problem to be solved simultaneously in each group.
Learning the group practice model that will be more efficient and effective in terms
of a limited number of practical tools, time, place can be conditioned room that can
be implemented for the competence of students in cognitive, psychomotor affective
and can be obtained after completion of learning experiences . Management of
quality assurance of learning with acculturation and this model has never been done
research in Physics Education Study Program Faculty of Teacher Training and
Education at the University of Sarjanawinyata Tamansiswa Yogyakarata , therefore
this study with the title above.
Problem formulation : How Knowing the quality assurance and effectiveness of
student learning outcomes in the cognitive competence , affective , and psychomotor
nontoni acculturation model (observation), neteni (remembering), neroke (imitating),
(4) nambahi (add) on activities, namely : (1) cooperative learning, (2) conducting
experiments, and (3) report experiments. The objective study to. Knowing the
quality assurance and effectiveness of student learning outcomes in the cognitive
competence, psychomotor, and effective with acculturation models nontoni
(observation), neteni (remembering), neroke (imitating), (4) nambahi (add) on
activities, namely : (1) learning cooperative, (2) conducting experiments, and (3)
report experiments.
LITERATURE REVIEW
Acculturation Learning. Acculturation practical learning by teaching Ki Hajar
Dewantara is Tri - N , namely : niteni, Neroke, and nambahi and in this study plus
one word nontoni making it into a chess - N , namely : (1) Nontoni, (2) Neteni ,
Neroke and nambahi so shortened to Chess - N ( Ki . B. Boentarsono et al, 2012: 20
) . Based on the researchers understanding of Chess - N can be defined : (1) Nontoni
-
International Seminar “Quality Assurance For Educational Services” Ki Sarino Mangun Pranoto Room - University of Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa Saturday, January 17th 2015
200
(observation), it means to make observations like what scientists using human senses
carefully or thoroughly, (2) Neteni (understand), meaning : to know, said, contrasted,
identify, demonstrate, attitudes, skills, character, and can show his form as a whole
of an object, (3) Neroke (repeat), meaning : repeats with repeated so that really can
do repetitions quickly, precisely and correctly so as to shown to be skilled in the
repeat behavior (neroke). Repeating this meant a person or student to own :
knowledge (cognitive), skills (psychomotor), and attitude (affective) , and (4)
nambahi (add), meaning that after learning activities nontoni, neteni, neroke and
neroke can improve the quality assurance of the results learning , among others for
example: basic theory, the concept of science, scientific principles, laws of science
that already exist or are be learned so it gets added value of prior knowledge. The
added value obtained after performing the learning process of the Tri - N, can
perform, among others : proposals, suggestions, creative, innovative, application,
development, and made possible the discovery of the laws of the new science.
Quality . Quality itself has changed a lot of criteria that continuously (Tjiptono and
Diana : 2003: 2). Quality means must meet established standards and based on the
National Standards for Higher Education ( SNPT ), about the competency standards
of Article 5 paragraph (1) competency standards are minimum criteria concerning
the qualifications of graduates capabilities that include attitudes, knowledge, and
skills that are expressed in the formulation of achievement learning (Regulation of
the Minister of Education and Culture of the Republic of Indonesia Number : 49 ;
2014: 5). So the quality is dynamic based on the criteria at the time and always
follow the demands of society and the development of science and technology at the
time. So the quality assurance undergraduate level college graduates bail is
competency standards with minimum criteria of competence and qualifications of
graduates include attitudes, knowledge, and skills that are expressed in the
formulation of learning outcomes.
Cooperative Learning Model. Model of cooperative learning model of STAD
(Studen Team Achievement Division) by Robert Slavin of the University Johns
Hopkins USA. In general the method of application of STAD model in the class are :
(1) the class is divided into several groups, (2) each student group consists of 4-5
people who are hiterogen, both in terms of ability, gender, culture, and so on, (3) of
-
International Seminar “Quality Assurance For Educational Services” Ki Sarino Mangun Pranoto Room - University of Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa Saturday, January 17th 2015
201
each group were given teaching materials and learning tasks that must be done, (4)
the groups are encouraged to study the teaching materials and tasks of learning
through discussion groups, (5) during the learning process as a group facilitator and
lecturer role as a motivator, (6) every week or two weeks, lecturers carry out the
evaluation, either individually or in groups to determine the learning progress of
students, and (7) for the students of the group of students who scored a perfect
learning outcomes rewarded. Similarly, if all groups scored a perfect learning
outcomes, then the whole group shall be rewarded (Made Wena, 2011: 192).
Essence of Learning Model . The term learning model by Kardi and Nur (2000 : 9 )
, is a learning model has a broader meaning than the strategies, methods, or
procedures. Teaching model has four special features that are not owned by the
strategies , methods, or procedures. These characteristics , are : (1 ) theoretical
rational logical compiled by the creator or developer ; (2) the rationale of what and
how great student learning ( learning objectives to be achieved ) ; (3) the behavior of
teaching required so that the model can be implemented successfully ; and (4)
learning environment that is necessary for learning objectives that can be achieved.
According Trianto (2010 : 53) learning model function here is to guide teachers and
teachers designer and lecturer in implementing the learning . As noted by Joyce and
Weil (1992 : 4) that the learning model is a plan or a pattern that is used as a
planning learning in the classroom or learning tutorials and to determine learning
tools such as books, movies, computers, etc. Based on some of the opinions about
the learning model , eventually learning model is covering the planning, design,
stage, guidelines, environmental, student products, quality of the learning outcomes ,
efficiency , and effectiveness to achieve the objectives to be achieved include
covering aspects of competence, namely : cognitive, psychomotor, and affective . So
learning model chosen must be able to produce the quality assurance of the learning
outcomes or college graduates .
Learning Model Experiments . The learning model experimental physics , can not
be separated from the nature of science learning among others physics . Based on
the results of various scientific discovery by humans in principle that science stems
from the curiosity of man, of the making of human curiosity is always observed on
natural phenomena that exist and try to understand it. Physics is a part of science or
science which was originally derived from the English science. The word science
-
International Seminar “Quality Assurance For Educational Services” Ki Sarino Mangun Pranoto Room - University of Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa Saturday, January 17th 2015
202
own comes from the Latin word meaning scentia I know. Science consists of the
social sciences ( social science ) and natural science ( natural science ) . Kardi and
Nur (1994 : 1), the physics of nature is knowledge about the world of matter, both
animate and inanimate beings who observation. Conclusion that physics is a
collection of systematic theory, general applicability is limited to the phenomena of
nature, born and developed through scientific methods such as observation and
experimentation as well as demanding scientific attitudes such as curiosity, open,
honest, and so on.
Taxonomy of Learning Objectives . Beyamin taxonomy of learning objectives
according to Bloom and D. Krathwohl (1964 : 20), is that there are three aspects of
competence, namely : cognitive , affective , and psychomotor . Cognitive aspects ,
has regional levels, namely : (1) knowledge ( word operational special purpose :
preparing, copying, naming certain objects, register, memorize, say, sort. To know,
and reconnected), (2) understanding (word specific operational objectives : classify,
describe, discuss, explain, express, define, allocate, report, admitted, dropping,
selecting, states, and translate), (3) the application (having said special operations :
apply, choose, demonstrate, dramatize, work , create illusions , interpret , operate ,
trainin , scheduling, sketching, solving, and admitted, (4) analysis (special purpose
operational word : counting, to categorize, compare, contracting, criticize , make
diagrams , differentiate , treat others , test , try , inventory, ask , test , and make
another), (5) synthesis (said operational specific objectives : organize, summarize,
collect, organize composition, build, create, design, formulate, organize, organize,
plan, prepare, propose, formulate, and writing ), and ( 6 ) evaluation ( special
purpose operational word : argument, correcting, attach, choose, compare, defend,
estimate, decide , think, guess, assume, given the value , choose , support , assess ,
and evaluating).
Learning Effectiveness . Understanding Learning Effectiveness General Dictionary
Indonesian According effectiveness is defined : ( 1 ) has effect , influence , or result ,
and ( 2 ) provide satisfactory results . Effectiveness means that the effect of the
nature or circumstances or results to ( JS Badudu , 1974: 371 ) . Effectiveness is the
derivation of effective word in the English language effective defined simply "
coming into use" ( Oxford Learner 's Pocket Dictionary , 2003: 138 ) . Effectiveness
in Encyclopedia as a Administration follows: " a situation that implies about the
-
International Seminar “Quality Assurance For Educational Services” Ki Sarino Mangun Pranoto Room - University of Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa Saturday, January 17th 2015
203
desired effect or result . If a person acts with intent to do something specific , which
is desired , then the person is said to be effective if it pleases consequences of it . " (
The Liang Gie , 1989: 108 ) . According Steers (1985 : 176 ) , that : " an
organization that is truly effective is the one who is able to create an atmosphere
where workers work not only carry out the work which has been charged , but also
create an atmosphere so that workers are more responsible , acting in creative in
order to improve efficiency in order to achieve the goal . " According to the learning
Effectiveness Criteria Hergenhahn & Matthew H Olson ( 208 : 2 ) learning is
measured by the change in behavior . After making the learning process will be able
to do something they could not do before they make the process of learning .
Learning will be effective if it involves physical or mental activity subject students
in the learning process . These activities will increase the mastery of cognitive ,
affective and psychomotor , giving rise to a change in the behavior of the subject
students .
Quality Assurance Results and Learning Physics . Based on the review of the
above theory , the concept of quality assurance must master competencies student
general there are three aspects ( 1 ) cognitive , ( 2 ) affective , and ( 3 ) psychomotor
and basic competence are : ( 1 ) an electric current induced magnetic field , ( 2 ) the
law Biot and Savart , ( 4 ) Ampere's law , ( 4 ) Faraday's law , ( 5 ) the laws Lenzt ,
and ( 6 ) magnetism . So build the character of students to master the basic
competencies of electric magnets can be done with the process skills . Skills used in
the learning process of students to instill character values of competence , there are
three , among others : ( 1 ) the process of learning by doing physics lab in groups
electric magnet , ( 2 ) develop a magnetic electrical physics lab report individually
with the format : basic theory , formulation of the problem , hypothesis , experiment
planning , experimentation , observation , data collection , data analysis , results ,
conclusions , and applications . ( 3 ) inquiry with the principle of cooperation
teachers and students in terms of : information , question and answer , observation ,
discussion , analysis , synthesis , formulation of the principle of the concept ( theory
) , making inferences , applications and improve the learning interaction .
Knowing the Concept of Quality Assurance and Effectiveness . Based on the
above concept description to know the quality assurance ( meet minimum
-
International Seminar “Quality Assurance For Educational Services” Ki Sarino Mangun Pranoto Room - University of Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa Saturday, January 17th 2015
204
competency standards ) and effectiveness ( no effect of changing attitudes towards
the subject of the student and the goal is reached ) after the student success through
skills assessment process is by using three instruments ; ( 1) The objective
questionnaire tests , ( 2 ) observation sheets , and ( 3 ) documentation based on the
report experiments with pre-defined format . Three assessment instrument is based
on lattice indicators of basic competencies mastered and done in the form of action
becomes a habit and it is called acculturation . The results of quality assurance
assessment and effectiveness of student learning outcomes obtained based on test
results of the three instruments . The results of student test scores obtained from the
three instruments , then be assessed with reference to SNPT minimum competence
criteria to assess the quality assurance and effectiveness learning outcomes of
students with predicate : ( 1 ) very good , ( 2 ) good ,(3) enough ( 4 ) less and ( 5 )
very less.
RESEARCH METHODS
This study used a qualitative descriptive approach refers more fenomenalogis
perspective . Research in view fenomenalogis attempt to use the meaning of events
and link - relation to the ordinary people in certain situations ( Moleong , 210 : 9 ) .
Views of its kind , is classified exploratory research on the management of quality
assurance and effectiveness of teaching students with learning civilizing nontoni ,
neteni , neroke , and nambahi the magnetic electrical courses .
Research variables . Learning management research with acculturation nonton ,
neteni, neroke and nambahi have variable ( Y ) as the dependent variable and
independent variables have , namely : ( X1 ) cooperative learning approach , ( X2 )
experimental group learning approach , and ( X3 ) documentation of student
experiments report .
Population , is the sum total of all units or elements which investigators interested .
The population can be either organism , the person or group of people , communities
, organizations , objects , objects , events or reports that everything has a
characteristic and must be specifically defined and not ambiguous ( Ulber Silalahi ,
2009: 253 ) . Sample , the majority of the population is selected for the data source (
Suhardi , 2008: 54 ) . The studies all members of the population will make the
sample , ie as a subject of study . Research place , is in the Physical Education
Studies Program , Faculty of Education and Science University Sarjanawiyata
-
International Seminar “Quality Assurance For Educational Services” Ki Sarino Mangun Pranoto Room - University of Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa Saturday, January 17th 2015
205
Tamansiswa education . The study begins planning , implementation , and prepare a
report takes five months from August to January of 2014 to 2015.
Data Analysis. Qualitative data analysis techniques according to Miles and
Huberman , 1984 ( Sugiyono , 2008: 246 ) activity in data analysis are : data
reduction , the data display and conclusion drawing or verification . In this study ,
after sorting the data in the context of data reduction performed a descriptive
analysis , which gives a description of the object of study based on data from a group
of research subjects . Step execution of data analysis are : ( 1 ) collecting data from
three instruments , ( 2 ) calculate the data in the score ( 3 ) classifies the data scores
on cognitive competence , affective and psychomotor , and ( 4 ) provide an
assessment with criteria score data into categories: : very good , good, fair , less , and
very less and ( 5 ) show the results of the study .
Assessment Criteria. Assessment of learning outcomes pejaminan management
quality and effectiveness of the civilizing nontoni , niteni , neroke , and nambahi
using ideal assessment criteria according Sukardjo category , et al (2006 : 75 ) with
the provision that can be seen in Table 3.1 .
Table 3.1
Criteria for Assessment of Quality and Effectiveness Research
Number
Quantitative Assessment scores
range Categories
Predicate Assessment
Criteria Quality and
Effectiveness
1 k > 83,99 Very Good
2 67,66 < k ≤ 83,99 Good
3 52,01 < k ≤67,66 Enough
4 36,01 < k ≤ 52,01 Less
5 k ≤ 36,01 Very Less
Calculation of Total Score . Calculation of the results of data collection in a score
of three instruments are : ( 1 ) questionnaire ( objective test ) correct answer scores 1
( one ) and one score of 0 ( zero ) and the lowest total score of 0 ( zero ) and the
number of the highest scores of 100 ( one hundred ) ; ( 2 ) the observation with
appropriate alternative answers Likert scale , namely : very good score = 5 , both
-
International Seminar “Quality Assurance For Educational Services” Ki Sarino Mangun Pranoto Room - University of Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa Saturday, January 17th 2015
206
score = 4 , quite a score = 3 , less scores = 2 , and so less score = 1. The calculation
of the minimum score of 20 ( two twenty ) and the highest score of 100 ( one
hundred ) , and ( 3 ) documentation of reports score calculation experiment with the
lowest score of 20 ( twenty ) and the highest scores of 100 ( one hundred ) .
Research Procedures . The study procedures were : ( 1 ) Preparation : ( a) preparing
lattice indicator assessment instrument , objective tests , observation sheets , reports
the experiment , ( b ) develop assessment instruments , ( c ) preparing a worksheet
experiment students , ( d ) preparing sheet experimental observations , ( e ) prepare a
report compiled format sheet experiment , ( f ) divides the experimental group , ( g )
prepare a schedule of the experiment ; ( 2 ) Implementation : ( a) exercising the test
first before learning process , ( b ) the implementation of a six-time experiment and
observation data retrieval when students perform experiments , ( c ) report the
experimental results of each student , ( d ) pelaksnaan test 2 with the objective test
questions ; ( 3 ) the results of the test score data merekap 1 , test 2 , experiment , and
documentation of student reports , ( 4 ) the assessment of the results of score data by
categories : excellent , good, fair , less , or much less and , ( 5 ) describe the
assessment research results and ( 6 ) prepare research reports .
RESEARCH RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Research Result. Learning outcomes of students with learning civilizing nontoni
models , neteni , neroke , and nambahi , namely : ( 1 ) The cooperative learning in
cognitive competency obtained score : 82.84 entrance predicate good , psychomotor
score of 84.43 entrance predicate obtained excellent , obtained a score of 85.56 entry
psychomotor predicate okay. ( 2 ) Learning experimental group on cognitive
competence obtained good scores predicate 80.50 entry , obtained a score of 80.50
psychomotor , and affective obtained good scores predicate 83.81 entry . And ( 3 )
Learning based documentation report experiments on cognitive competence obtained
score : 84.43 very good , psychomotor score of 85.56 entrance predicate obtained
very good , and affective obtained good scores predicate 83.43 entry .Discussion .
Learning outcomes with civilizing nontoni , niteni , neroke and nambahi do
discussion as follows , namely : ( 1 ) cooperative activities on competency in the
cognitive, psychomotor , and affective average score of 83.61 incoming obtained
good title , it means quality assurance and effectiveness can unbelievable . ( 2 ) The
results of the experimental activities of student competency in the cognitive,
-
International Seminar “Quality Assurance For Educational Services” Ki Sarino Mangun Pranoto Room - University of Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa Saturday, January 17th 2015
207
psychomotor , and affective obtained an average score of 82.31 get in a good rating ,
meaning that it can be used as an effective quality assurance and good entry
predicate , and ( 3 ) The results of activities based documentation of student
experiments competency report the cognitive, psychomotor , and affective obtained
average score of 84.43 rat entered the predicate excellent , quality assurance and
effectiveness meaning can be very accountable . So the results of research based on
criteria of quality assurance and effectiveness of learning with models notoni , neteni
, neroke and nambahi in all three models of cooperative learning approach ,
experiment , and documentation of student reports obtained an average score of
83.45 entry predicate good , it means quality assurance and effectiveness can be
trusted with either .
CONCLUSION AND ADVICE
Conclusion . ( 1 ) Guarantee the quality and effectiveness of student learning
outcomes of the activities of the experiment ( experiment ) with pembuadayaan
nontoni , neteni , neroke and nambahi on cognitive competence , psychomotor , and
affective enter predicate good , ( 2 ) quality assurance and effectiveness of student
learning outcomes empowerment model nontoni , neteni , neroke and nambahi of
documents report experiments on cognitive competence , psychomotor , and
affective entrance excellent predicate , ( 3 ) Guarantee the quality and effectiveness
of cooperative learning students with acculturation nontoni , neteni , neroke and
nambahi on cognitive aspects of predicate good entry , and ( 4 ) guarantee the
quality and effectiveness of the learning outcomes of students from three
experimental learning activities , documentation reports , and cooperative with the
civilizing nontoni , nambahi , neroke , and nambahi on cognitive competence ,
psychomotor , and affective enter predicate good , it means quality assurance and
effectiveness can be properly accounted for . Suggestions . The results of this study
on the effectiveness of the quality assurance and achieve a good rating and ,
therefore expected no improvement in the management of cooperative learning ,
experiment equipment, coaching in preparing the trial reports , and worksheets
student learning to be very good.
-
International Seminar “Quality Assurance For Educational Services” Ki Sarino Mangun Pranoto Room - University of Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa Saturday, January 17th 2015
208
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Ainen Mohammad, (19780). Penerapan Teori Piaget dalam Pengajaran Science dan
Matematika, FKIE: Yogyakarta.
Dahar, R.M, (1989).Teori Belajar, Jakarta: Erlangga.
E. Mulyasa, (2006). Kurikulum Berbasis Kompetensi, Bandung: Remaja
Rosdakarya.
Joyce, Weil, dan Calhoun. (2009), Models of Teaching. New Jesey: Upper Saddle
River.Lie. A. (2002). Cooperative Learning. Jakarata: Gramidia Widiasarana
Indonesia,
Made Wena. (2011). Strategi Pembelajaran Inovatif Kontemporer. Jakarta: PT Bumi
Aksara.
Muchlas Samani. (2011). Pendidikan karakter, Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Priyanto, (2005). Keefektifan Pembelajaran Kooperatif Model Jig Saw Pada Mata
Pelajaran Kimia Siswa Kelas X Aliyah Darut Taqwa, Tesis S2 PPs
UM.
Sedyawati, Edi dkk, (1997). Pedoman Penanaman Budi Pekerti Luhur,, Jakarta: balai
Pustaka.
Sugiyono. (2007). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Suyoso, (2008). Listrik Magnet, Yogyakarta: UNY.
Sukarno, N, (1973). Dasar Dasar pendidikan Science, Bandung: Batara.
Sukardjo dan Lis Permana Sari. (2006). Penilaian Hasil Belajar Kimia, Jogyakarta:
FMIPA UNY.
Trianto. (2010). Model Pembelajaran Terpadu, Bandung: bumi Aksara.
.............; Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia No. 19 tahun 2005, tentang
Standar Nasional Pendidikan, Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional
Replublik Indonesia.